Abstract
The findings in a highly selected group of patients, such as those attending clinics or sanatoria, cannot be used as the basis for assessing the true prevalence of strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with acquired or primary resistance or of sensitive strains in a community. The present report describes the prevalence of such strains as found in 3 successive surveys in a sizeable random sample of villages in a South Indian district. Changes in the status of cases with such strains from an earlier survey to a later one and the status at an earlier round of cases found at a later one are also described.
The prevalence of tuberculous infection among household contacts of cases with acquired resistance to isoniazid was significantly higher than that among contacts of cases with primary resistance or of those with sensitive cultures. This is probably due to the longer duration of sputum positivity of the former at the time of diagnosis. But infectivity, as judged by the incidence of new infections among household contacts, was generally less for cases with acquired or primary resistance than for cases with sensitive cultures, though the difference was not statistically significant.
A large number of culture-positive cases, especially those with primary resistance, had no radiological evidence of active pulmonary tuberculosis. The prevalence of primary resistance was very high among certain categories of cases, and the differences between cases with primary resistance and those with acquired resistance were many and large. It is suggested that this could be due to some of the primary resistant cultures being those of atypical mycobacteria, despite positivity in the niacin test.
There was a significant increase in the number of cases with acquired resistance to isoniazid at the third survey round owing to irregular treatment with that drug after the second round. The prevalence of primary resistance at the 3 rounds was almost the same.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- FOX W., WIENER A., MITCHISON D. A., SELKON J. B., SUTHERLAND I. The prevalence of drug-resistant tubercle bacilli in untreated patients with pulmonary tuberculosis; a national survey, 1955-56. Tubercle. 1957 Apr;38(2):71–84. doi: 10.1016/s0041-3879(57)80001-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HOBBY G. L., LENERT T. F., MAIER J., O'MALLEY P. PRIMARY DRUG RESISTANCE. II. A CONTINUING STUDY OF TUBERCLE BACILLI IN A VETERAN POPULATION WITHIN THE UNITED STATES. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1965 Jan;91:30–34. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1965.91.1.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MIDDLEBROOK G., DRESSLER S. H. Clinical evaluation of isoniazid. Am Rev Tuberc. 1954 Dec;70(6):1102–1103. doi: 10.1164/art.1954.70.6.1102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller A. B., Tall R., Fox W., Lefford M. J., Mitchison D. A. Primary drug resistance in pulmonary tuberculosis in Great Britain: second national survey, 1963. Tubercle. 1966 Mar;47(1):92–108. doi: 10.1016/s0041-3879(66)80053-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NARAIN R., GESER A., JAMBUNATHAN M. V., SUBRAMANIAN M. SOME ASPECTS OF A TUBERCULOSIS PREVALENCE SURVEY IN A SOUTH INDIAN DISTRICT. Bull World Health Organ. 1963;29:641–664. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Narain R. Interpretation of the repeat tuberculin test. Tubercle. 1968 Mar;49(1):92–103. doi: 10.1016/s0041-3879(68)80011-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Narain R., Nair S. S., Chandrasekhar P., Rao G. R. Problems connected with estimating the incidence of tuberculosis infection. Bull World Health Organ. 1966;34(4):605–622. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noufflard-Guy-Loe H., Berteaux S. Late emergence of isoniazid-susceptible organisms in guinea pigs challenged with a homogeneous isoniazid-resistant strain on Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1966 Oct;94(4):540–552. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1966.94.4.540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ROELSGAARD E., IVERSEN E., BLOCHER C. TUBERCULOSIS IN TROPICAL AFRICA. AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY. Bull World Health Organ. 1964;30:459–518. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]