Abstract
The most widely used serological reaction for the diagnosis of leptospirosis is the agglutination test. This test, however, cannot be carried out in many laboratories because special equipment and special experience are required. It is also necessary to maintain live Leptospira cultures belonging to all the serotypes present in the country where the test is made. Consequently, it would be extremely useful to be able to diagnose leptospirosis by means of a single antigen, regardless of the serotype to which the Leptospira responsible for the infection belonged. This is particularly important for countries in which the antigenic pattern of the local leptospirae is not well known and in which it would thus be necessary to use a large number of Leptospira serotypes for each test.
Observations made in the last 11 years have suggested that the problem may be solved with the use of some non-pathogenic, water strains of Leptospira which seem to be agglutinated by human sera containing antibodies against pathogenic leptospirae. This paper reports the results of studies from 1960 to 1968 on the possibility of using water strains for serodiagnosis.
The results over the 8-year period show that the non-pathogenic strain Patoc 1 is agglutinated by a high percentage of human sera positive for pathogenic leptospirae: these results indicate that Patoc 1 would be useful for serodiagnosis. However, a high percentage of animal sera positive for pathogenic leptospirae gave negative results with the strains Patoc 1 and Sao Paulo, and thus these strains cannot be used for serodiagnosis in animals.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BABUDIERI B., DYMOWSKA Z. [Studies on a Polish strain of Leptospira of the serogroup "Semaranga"]. Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1961 May;182:129–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CHANG R. S. M., McCOMB D. E. Erythrocyte sensitizing substance from five strains of Leptospirae. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1954 May;3(3):481–489. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1954.3.481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- COMBIESCU D., STURDZA N., SEFER M., RADU I. Leptospirenforschungen in Rumänien. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig. 1958 Nov;173(1-2):103–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CORREA M. O., HYAKUTAKE S., NATALE V., TIRIBAADA C., GALVAO P. A. LEPTOSPIROSES HUMANAS AINDA N AO ASSINALADAS NO BRASIL. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1964 Mar-Apr;6:71–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- COX C. D., STOVER R. C., TREICK R. W. Serological studies on hemolytic antigen from Leptospira. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1958 Jun;98(2):265–269. doi: 10.3181/00379727-98-24012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CZEKALOWSKI J. W., HORNE G. O. Abacterial cystitis; report of three cases and isolation of a spirochaete from one. Br Med J. 1951 Oct 13;2(4736):879–881. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4736.879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FUZI M., CSOKA R. [Differentiation of pathogenic and saprophytic Leptospira with a copper sulfate test]. Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1960 Jun;179:231–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KMETY E. Betrachtungen zum Problem der paradoxen Reaktion und deren Bedeutung in der Serodiagnostik einiger Leptospirosen. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig. 1958 Feb;170(8):597–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mailloux M. Utilité de l'antigène Leptospira biflexa Patoc dans les sérodiagnostics de leptospiroses. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1967 Jan;112(1):121–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicolesco M., Leluţiu C. Diagnostic par la réaction de fixation du complément à l'aide d'un antigène unique dans le décèlement des leptospiroses animales. Arch Roum Pathol Exp Microbiol. 1967 Sep;26(3):557–564. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TOPCIU V., MARIN I., CUCURUZ L., ELIAS I. M., REICHRATH S., PORSCHE T., FRASINEL N. Izolarea tulpinilor de leptospire patogene de la rozătoare şi de la om. Stud Cercet Inframicrobiol. 1957;8(1):115–120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Torten M., Shenberg E., Van der Hoeden J. The use of immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of human leptospirosis by a genus-specific antigen. J Infect Dis. 1966 Dec;116(5):537–543. doi: 10.1093/infdis/116.5.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]