Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 1963;28(4):499–503.

Identification of the causative agents and the epidemiology of porcine brucellosis*

Margaret E Meyer, H S Cameron
PMCID: PMC2554732  PMID: 13935298

Abstract

Brucella organisms that had been isolated from swine or from human beings exposed to infected swine, and that had been previously identified as members of the species Br. melitensis, were examined for their oxidative metabolism, for their growth patterns on media containing basic fuchsin and thionin, and for their hydrogen sulfide production. These organisms displayed the oxidative metabolic pattern that characterizes and identifies the members of the species Br. suis. They also are identical to Br. suis, type 1, in their tolerance to increased concentrations of thionin in the growth media. They are similar to Br. suis, type 2, in their inability to produce hydrogen sulfide, and share with other members of the species Br. suis the characteristic preference for a porcine host. These findings are evidence that these organisms are not Br. melitensis but are a biotype of Br. suis. Their correct identification is important to understanding the epidemiology of brucellosis.

Full text

PDF
499

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. HOERLEIN A. B. Studies in swine brucellosis. I. The pathogenesis of artificial Brucella melitensis infection. Am J Vet Res. 1952 Jan;13(46):67–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. HUDDLESON I. F. Emergence during growth of Brucella strains on dye-agar media of cells that show changes in sulfur metabolism. Bull World Health Organ. 1961;24:91–102. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. MEYER M. E., CAMERON H. S. Metabolic characterization of the genus Brucella. I. Statistical evaluation of the oxidative rates by which type I of each species can be identified. J Bacteriol. 1961 Sep;82:387–395. doi: 10.1128/jb.82.3.387-395.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MEYER M. E., MORGAN W. J. Metabolic characterization of Brucella strains that show conflicting identity by biochemical and serological methods. Bull World Health Organ. 1962;26:823–827. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. MEYER M. E. Metabolic characterization of the genus Brucella. III. Oxidative metabolism of strains that show anomalous characteristics by conventional determinative methods. J Bacteriol. 1961 Sep;82:401–410. doi: 10.1128/jb.82.3.401-410.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McCULLOUGH N. B., EISELE C. W., PAVELCHEK E. Survey of brucellosis in slaughtered hogs. Public Health Rep. 1951 Feb 16;66(7):205–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. PICKETT M. J., NELSON E. L. Speciation within the genus Brucella. IV. Fermentation of carbohydrates. J Bacteriol. 1955 Mar;69(3):333–336. doi: 10.1128/jb.69.3.333-336.1955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. RENOUX G. La notion d'espèce dans le genre Brucella. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 1958 Feb;94(2):179–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. STOENNER H. G. Isolation of Brucella abortus from sheep. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1951 Feb;118(887):101–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES