Skip to main content
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 1964;30(6):833–844.

Agglutinating, lethal toxin and El Tor haemolysin neutralizing potency of sera in cholera

Oscar Felsenfeld, Napha Nasuniya, Yoshikazu Watanabe, Anita Peña, Ben N Dale
PMCID: PMC2555081  PMID: 14215189

Abstract

There is a lack of agreement as to the significance of agglutination test results in cholera, and recent epidemics of “classic” Vibrio comma and El Tor infections have provided an opportunity to compare this test with two other serological procedures recently introduced in cholera work. These are determination of the circulating antitoxin expressed as the lethal toxin neutralizing power of a serum, and determination of the haemolysin neutralizing power through serial test-tube dilutions.

Applying these tests to sera from cholera patients, convalescents, carriers and contacts and from immunized persons either exposed or not exposed to cholera, the authors found the agglutination test to be a less sensitive indicator of the immunological status than the other two procedures. They therefore recommend antitoxin and antihaemolysin titration for the study of cholera patients, convalescents and carriers. In the conditions of the experiments described, the results with exposed and non-exposed vaccinated individuals were less conclusive, but nevertheless suggest that antitoxin and antihaemolysin tests may be helpful in the follow-up of vaccination experiments.

Full text

PDF
833

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ARAGON P. R., FAMATIGA E. G. ANTIHEMOLYSIN ACTIVITY OF SERA OF E1 TOR CHOLERA PATIENTS. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1963 Nov;12:893–894. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1963.12.893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DELPY L. [Possibilities of improving anticholera vaccines and methods of evaluation of their efficacy]. Bull World Health Organ. 1963;28(3):369–378. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FELSENFELD O. Some observations on the cholera (E1 Tor) epidemic in 1961-62. Bull World Health Organ. 1963;28(3):289–296. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MORGAN F. M., FELSENFELD O., RODVANTANAKUL B., BUSPAVANICH S., BANDHUMEDHA B., CHOWVANASA I. A study of patients with mild cholera in Bangkok, Thailand, spring, 1959. Am J Hyg. 1960 Sep;72:250–260. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. PREER J. R., Jr A quantitative study of a technique of double diffusion in agar. J Immunol. 1956 Jul;77(1):52–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. WATANABE Y., FELSENFELD O. Production of vibrio El Tor toxin in a liquid medium. J Bacteriol. 1961 Jul;82:43–47. doi: 10.1128/jb.82.1.43-47.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES