Skip to main content
Bulletin of the World Health Organization logoLink to Bulletin of the World Health Organization
. 1965;32(1):15–27.

Evaluation of typhoid vaccines in the laboratory and in a controlled field trial in Poland*

Preliminary report

Polish Typhoid Committee
PMCID: PMC2555203  PMID: 14290075

Abstract

In 1961 a controlled field trial of anti-typhoid vaccines was carried out in 25 regions in Poland. Four types of vaccine were studied: (1) bacterial acetone-killed and -dried vaccine (two kinds), (2) bacterial formol-killed phenol-preserved vaccine, (3) Westphal's endotoxin adsorbed on aluminium hydroxide, and (4) Grasset's vaccine (autolysate of typhoid bacilli adsorbed on aluminium hydroxide). The control vaccine was tetanus toxoid. A total of 690 655 persons received two inoculations. Prior to the field trial, laboratory tests were carried out on the vaccines, postvaccinal reactions were studied, and a serological examination was made of randomly selected blood samples. The vaccination was followed by a two-year survey of cases of typhoid and other diseases. Among children aged 5-14 years, the formol-killed phenol-preserved vaccine was found to be the most effective and Grasset's vaccine the least. Among adults aged 15-60 years, no conclusive evidence for the effectiveness of the vaccines could be obtained owing to the small number of cases. This may be due to the maintenance of immunity through repeated annual vaccination with bacterial vaccines.

Full text

PDF
15

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. KOPACKA B., SLUBICKA A. OCENA SZCZEPIONEK I SKUTECZNO'SCI SZCZEPIE'N PRZECIW DUROWI BRZUSZNEMU. VIII.ODPOWIED'Z SEROLOGICZNA U OS'OB UODPORNIONYCH ROZNYMI SZCZEPIONKAMI PRZECIWDUROWYMI. Przegl Epidemiol. 1963;17:55–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. KOSTRZEWSKI J. OCENA SZCZEPIONEK I SKUTECZNO'SCI SZCZEPIE'N PRZECIW DUROWI BRZUSZNEMU. I. UZASADNIENIE, PLAN I ORGANIZACJA BADA'N. Przegl Epidemiol. 1963;17:1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. KOSTRZEWSKI J., PLACHCINSKA J. OCENA SZCZEPIONEK I SKUTECZNO'SCI SZCZEPIE'N PRZECIW DUROWI BRZUSZNEMU. XI. OCENA MOCY IMMUNOGENNEJ SZCZEPIONEK K, N, P, S, T TESTEM CZYNNYM NA MYSZACH ZAKAZANYCH S. TYPHI Z ZYMOSANEM. Przegl Epidemiol. 1963;17:71–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. KRUCZALOWA M., SCHILLEROWA B. OCENA SZCZEPIONEK I SKUTECZNO'SCI SZCZEPIE'N PRZECIW DUROWI BRZUSZNEMU. III. WYROB I WST EPNA CHARAKTERYSTYKA SCZEPIONEK PRZENZNACZONYCH DO SZCZEPIE'N KONTROLOWANYCH. Przegl Epidemiol. 1963;17:23–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. LADOSZ J. OCENA SZCZEPIONEK I SKUTECZNO'SCI SZCZEPIE'N PRZECIW DUROWI BRZUSZNEMU. IX. WYKORZYSTANIE TESTU FAGOCYTARNEGO DO OCENY SKUTECZNO'SCI SZCZEPEPIE'N PRZECIWKO DUROWI BRZUSZNEMU. (DONIESIENIE TYMCZASOWE) Przegl Epidemiol. 1963;17:63–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ZOLNIERKOWA D., PRZESTALSKA H. OCENA SZCZEPIONEK I SKUTECZNO'SCI SZCZEPIE'N PRZECIW DUROWI BRZUSZNUMU. IV. WST EPNA OCENA ODCZY'NOW POSZCZEPIENNYCH. Przegl Epidemiol. 1963;17:33–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the World Health Organization are provided here courtesy of World Health Organization

RESOURCES