Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Sep 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Jul 27;127(29):10132–10133. doi: 10.1021/ja0511974

Dendrimer-Like PEO Glycopolymers Exhibit Anti-Inflammatory Properties

Shyam M Rele 1,*, Wanxing Cui 1, Lianchun Wang 1, Sijian Hou 1, Ginger Barr-Zarse 1, Daniel Tatton 1, Yves Gnanou 1, Jeffrey D Esko 1, Elliot L Chaikof 1,*
PMCID: PMC2556565  NIHMSID: NIHMS63654  PMID: 16028900

Selectin-induced leukocyte rolling on endothelial surfaces is an essential step in mediating cellular adhesion thereby initiating the complex cascade of events leading to inflammatory and cell-mediated immune responses.1 Characteristically, the adhesion cascade is facilitated by the interaction of selectins (L-, P-, E-) with O-glycosylated protein ligands (PSGL-1, CD34 and GlyCAM-1) that present carbohydrate epitopes containing sulfated derivatives of the tetrasaccharide sialyl Lewis x (Neu5Acα 3Galβ4(Fucα3)GlcNAc-, sLex). Significant effort has been directed towards generating sLex mimetics (di-, tri-, tetrasaccharides) in the form of small molecules, polymers, liposomes, and protein conjugates, as competitive inhibitors of selectin-mediated binding events.2 However, relatively weak affinity (Kd 0.1–5.0 mM), susceptibility to hydrolytic cleavage, potential antigenicity, and short circulating half-life, in addition to the absence of a convenient synthetic route are acknowledged limitations of sLex-derivatized bioconjugates. Thus, motivation exists to develop simpler therapeutic oligosaccharide analogs as selectin-binding antagonists, which structurally resemble naturally occurring saccharide arrays and exhibit multiple and cooperative receptor binding properties.

The simultaneous presentation of multiple copies of biorecognizable saccharide epitopes on an appropriate macromolecular scaffold creates a multivalent display that amplifies the affinity of glycoside-mediated receptor targeting.3,4 In this regard, well-defined branched polyethylene oxide (PEO) polymers of tailored size, shape, and geometry provide singularly useful scaffolds for in vivo blockade of selectin binding due to their defined molecular architecture, hydrophilicity, and availability of multiple surface reactive sites.5 Moreover, the branched polymer structure also provides a mechanism for controlling accessibility, mobility, density, and supramolecular organization of pendant sugar epitopes, as additional elements that may facilitate the design of optimal selectin-binding antagonists with defined circulating half-life. Herein, we report a simple strategy for the synthesis of 1st and 2nd generation dendrimer-like PEO glycopolymers bearing sulfated β-lactose as potential L-selectin inhibitors. Most current glycoconjugation strategies describe the use of an aliphatic or aromatic aglycone linker that carries an amine, thiol, thiourea, acid or active ester as the reactive moiety. Significantly, by using imidated lactose donors and a Schmidt glycosidation coupling protocol protecting group manipulations were minimized in the process of glycopolymer synthesis.

Well-defined three (Mn ~5200 mu) and four arm (Mn ~5100 mu) PEO stars (1st generation) carrying hydroxy end groups, were synthesized by anionic polymerization using “core-first” methodology, as previously reported.6a,b In addition, a dendrimer-like second generation PEO star polymer (twelve arm) was synthesized based on a phosphazene core. This polymer consisted of a first generation of six PEO arms, produced by an “arm-first” strategy onto the phosphazene core, followed by a second generation of 12 hydroxy-terminated PEO branches polymerized directly onto the original 6-arm core (Mn ~52 kD).6c β-Lactose octaacetate was selectively brominated at the anomeric centre and subsequently activated to the imidate donor (A).

Glycosylations of hydroxy-terminated PEO star and dendrimer-like polymers by trichloroacetimidate glycosidation methodology, using BF3·OEt2 as a Lewis acid activator resulted in the covalent attachment of acetyl protected lactose residues in high yield. Zemplen conditions for deacetylation (NaOMe/MeOH) followed by lactose sulfation using an excess of SO3 trimethylamine complex furnished target PEO glycoclusters carrying terminal sulfated oligosaccharides 1c, 2c, and 3c. The efficiency, homogeneity, and degree of ligand (lactose) loading on the PEO polymers was estimated by 1H NMR spectroscopy, as well as by mass estimates obtained by MALDI-TOF and laser light scattering. Moreover, FTIR and SDS-PAGE analysis provided additional evidence of sulfated lactose units (See supplementary information).

Specifically, the relative intensities of the anomeric H:Ac:CH3 signal ratio of 6:20.9:3 for the three arm (1a) derivative and an integration ratio of 7.95:27.97:8 for the four arm glycocluster 2a, indicated complete glycosylation of the hydroxyl groups on the parent PEO precursor. The increase in molecular weight was further corroborated using MALDI-TOF (1a: 6899 mu, 2a: 7524 mu) and LLS measurements confirming quantitative functionalization. Likewise, an NMR integration ratio of 3.9:13.7:3, as well as MALDI-TOF demonstrated a high degree of lactose conjugation (> 95%) onto the dendritic PEO scaffold of the 12-arm, 2nd generation, branched compound. Subsequent deprotection followed by sulfation produced a highly charged sulfated glycodendron 3c (observed SELDI-TOF: 61.8 kD, expected value ~62 kD).

Recent investigations have demonstrated that heparin exhibits anti-inflammatory properties by mediating blockade of L- and P-selectins via sulfate dependant interactions.7 Moreover, in vitro observations have illustrated that sulfated esters promote selectin binding when appropriately orientated on a lactose core. For example, a sulfated lactose derivative (6,6′-disulfo lactose), lacking in fucose and sialic acid residues, was a superior to sLex as an in vitro inhibitor of L-selectin binding to GlyCAM-1.8 Since selectin-glycoligand binding is greatly amplified through multivalent presentation of oligosaccharide determinants, we explored the capacity of sulfated branched star and dendrimer-like glycopolymers to limit inflammatory responses in vivo via presumed selectin-dependant blockade. Acute peritoneal inflammation was induced in a mouse model by thioglycollate injection into the peritoneal cavity. Test compound potency was valence-dependant with glycopolymers 1c/2c exhibiting little activity, while 3c (0.5 mg/mouse IV) dramatically reduced neutrophil and macrophage recruitment by 86% and 60%, respectively (Fig. 4, p < 0.05). Although heparin inhibited inflammatory cell recruitment to a similar degree, concurrent anticoagulant effects limit heparin’s clinical applicability. In contrast, 3c, does not exhibit anti-thrombin activity (data not shown). The ability of 3c to inhibit the adhesion of U937 lymphoma cells to immobilized P-, L- or E-selectins was examined, in order to determine whether the observed in vivo effect was mediated by presumed selectin blockade. Test compound 3c selectively blocked the adhesion of U937 cells to L-selectin in a dose dependent manner (IC50 = 2.4 nM), but did not exhibit anti-P-selectin or E-selectin activity (Fig. 5). Therefore, 3c is among the most potent L-selectin inhibitors yet reported.2a,8,9,10 Significantly, precedence exists for increased biological activity as a consequence of ligand presentation by dendrimeric scaffolds when compared to linear counterparts.2b Despite significant anti-L-selectin activity, the observed in vivo activity was surprising, since it has been recently reported that heparin’s anti-inflammatory activity in vivo is critically dependant on its ability to inhibit both L- and P-selectin mediated inflammatory cell adhesion.7 Indeed, a compound acting solely as a selective inhibitor of L-selectin is not anticipated to block in vivo leukocyte infiltration so completely. Thus, it is likely that 3c, like heparin, blocks chemokine binding to the endothelium, which would further limit leukocyte extravasation.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Neutrophil and macrophage content in thioglycollate-induced peritoneal inflammation (n = 6). A: Neutrophil. B: Macrophage. Significant differences were observed in neutrophil and macrophage content in mice treated with heparin and 3c compared with control mice that received saline (p < 0.05). Compounds 1c/2c did not exhibit in vivo activity. Each bar represents the average value ± SD.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Competitive inhibition of U937 cell adhesion to immobilized A) L- selectin, B) P-selectin. Neither heparin nor 3c exhibited inhibitory activity towards E-selectin. Inhibition was not observed in the absence of test compound or heparin. Data represents means of at least n = 3, SD < 10%).

In summary, a new class of high molecular weight polysulfated PEO dendrimer-like glycopolymer has been synthesized by a combination of arm-first and core-first methodologies followed by trichloroacetimidate glycosidation as a facile bioconjugation strategy. This is the first report to describe the synthesis and biological evaluation of complex branched PEO heparinoid-mimics, which provides an easily accessible route to carbohydrate-based compounds with anti-inflammatory activity in vivo.

Supplementary Material

1si20050607_10. Supporting Information Available.

Detailed synthetic procedures MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy, SDS-PAGE, and NMR analysis (PDF) is available free of charge at http://pubs.acs.org.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

I) Selectin blockade using polyvalent branched glycoconjugates. II) Glycosidation of terminal hydroxyls on a PEO scaffold using lactose imidate (A).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Saccharide-functionalized PEO star and ‘dendrimer-like’ polymers as selectin ligands.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

600 MHz 1H NMR spectrum of 3a (2nd generation, 12 end groups) recorded in CDCl3 at 25 °C. Inset shows the MALDI-TOF spectra of the original hydroxyl-terminated phosphazene core-based PEO branched polymer and glycodendrimer 3a, confirming a high degree of sugar conjugation.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH grants HL57345 to JDE and HL60464 to ELC.

References

  • 1.(a) Ulbrich H, Eriksson E, Lindbom L. Trends Pharmacological Sc. 2003;24:640–647. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2003.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ley K. Trends Molecular Med. 2003;9:263–268. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4914(03)00071-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hopfner M, Alban S, Schumacher, Rothe U, Bendas G. J Pharmacy and Phamacology. 2003;55:697–706. doi: 10.1211/002235703765344621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Lowe JB, Ward PA. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:822–826. doi: 10.1172/JCI119244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Sanders WJ, Gordon EJ, Oren D, Beck PJ, Ronen A, Kiessling LL. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:5271–5278. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.9.5271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Reuter J, et al. Bioconjugate Chem. 1999;10:271–278. doi: 10.1021/bc980099n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Lin C-C, Kimura T, Wu S-H, Weitz-Schmidt G, Wong C-H. Biorg Med Chem Lett. 1996;6:2755–2760. [Google Scholar]; (d) Spevak W, Foxall C, Charych D, Dasgupta F, Nagy JO. J Med Chem. 1996;39:1018–1020. doi: 10.1021/jm950914+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) DeFrees SA, Phillips L, Guo L, Zalipsky S. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:6101–6104. [Google Scholar]; (g) Manning DD, Strong L, Hu X, Beck P, Kiessling LL. Tetrahedron. 1997;53:11937–11952. [Google Scholar]; (h) Thoma G, Duthaler RO, Magnani JL, Patton JT. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:10113–10114. doi: 10.1021/ja0164430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Barbaro J. Curr Org Chem. 2004;8:883–902. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Lundquist JJ, Toone EJ. Chem Rev. 2002;102:555–578. doi: 10.1021/cr000418f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Mammen M, Choi SK, Whitesides GM. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 1998;37:2754–2794. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19981102)37:20<2754::AID-ANIE2754>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Aoyama Y. Chem-Eur J. 2004;10:588–593. doi: 10.1002/chem.200305288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Casnati A, Sansone F, Ungaro R. Acc Chem Res. 2003;36:246–254. doi: 10.1021/ar0200798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Shaunak S, et al. Nat Biotechnol. 2004;22:977–984. doi: 10.1038/nbt995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Frey H, Haag R. Rev Mol Biotech. 2002;90:257–267. doi: 10.1016/s1389-0352(01)00063-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zalipsky S. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 1995;16:157–182. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Hou S, Chaikof E, Taton D, Gnanou Y. Macromolecules. 2003;36:3874–3881. [Google Scholar]; (b) Angot S, Taton D, Gnanou Y. Macromolecules. 2000;33:5418–5424. [Google Scholar]; (c) Hou S, Taton D, Saule M, Logan J, Chaikof E, Gnanou Y. Polymer. 2003;44:5067–5074. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang L, Brown J, Varki A, Esko J. J Clinical Invest. 2002;110:127–136.7. doi: 10.1172/JCI14996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.(a) Bruehl R, Bertozzi C, Rosen S. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:32642–32648. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M001703200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Rosen D. Am J Pathal. 1999;155:1013–1020. [Google Scholar]; (c) Galustian C, Lubineau A, le Narvor C, Kiso M, Brown G, Feizi T. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:18213–18217. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.26.18213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.(a) Roy R, Park WC, Zanini D, Foxall C, Srivastava OP. Carbohydr Lett. 1997;2:259. [Google Scholar]; (b) Mowery P, Yang Z-Q, Gordon ED, Beck, Spencer A, Alon R, Kiessling L. Chem & Biol. 2004;11:725–732. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.03.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xie X, Rivier AS, Zakrzewicz A, Bernimoulin M, Zeng XL, Wessel HP, Schapira M, Spertini O. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:34818–34825. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M001257200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1si20050607_10. Supporting Information Available.

Detailed synthetic procedures MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy, SDS-PAGE, and NMR analysis (PDF) is available free of charge at http://pubs.acs.org.

RESOURCES