Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 1984 Jun;50(3):748–758. doi: 10.1128/jvi.50.3.748-758.1984

Replication of endogenous avian retrovirus in permissive and nonpermissive chicken embryo fibroblasts.

E H Humphries, R Allen
PMCID: PMC255733  PMID: 6328004

Abstract

Clones of chicken embryo fibroblasts exogenously infected with the endogenous avian retrovirus were analyzed to examine the replication of this virus in permissive (Gr+) and nonpermissive (Gr-) cells. The results demonstrate that the endogenous virus was capable of infecting both Gr+ and Gr- cells with equal efficiency. Infected clones of Gr+ and Gr- cells differed, however, in two significant ways. At the time of their initial characterization, the Gr+ clones produced 100- to 1,000-fold more virus than the Gr- clones. Further, the amount of virus produced by Gr+ clones did not change significantly during serial passage of the cells. In contrast, continued passage of the infected Gr- clones resulted in a gradual increase in the amount of virus produced. Individual clones of infected Gr- cells produced infectious virus at rates that, initially, differed by a factor of more than 10(4). The large differences in the production of virus by these clones could not be explained by equally large differences in the number of infected cells within the clonal populations. Greater than 80% of the clonal populations examined ultimately produced virus at rates that were not significantly different from the rates observed in infected Gr+ cells. Virus produced by these infected Gr- cells exhibited the same restricted replication upon establishing a new infection in nonpermissive cells. Analysis of the appearance of free and integrated viral DNA sequences during endogenous virus infection of Gr+ and Gr- cells demonstrated that, after an initial delay in the synthesis of free viral DNA in Gr- cells, the nonpermissive cells ultimately acquired as many integrated viral DNA sequences as were found in infected Gr+ cells. These results indicate that a majority of the infectious particles of the endogenous virus are capable of establishing infection in a Gr- cell and, ultimately, of producing virus at a rate that is not significantly different from that produced by infected Gr+ cells. The virus produced from the Gr- cells is not a stable genetic variant of the original endogenous virus that is capable of unrestricted replication in nonpermissive cells. The reduced efficiency with which the endogenous virus initially replicates in nonpermissive cells and the increased length of time required for infected Gr- cells to produce maximal virus titers suggest that the endogenous virus may utilize a different mechanism of replication in Gr+ and Gr- fibroblasts.

Full text

PDF
748

Images in this article

756Image
on p.756
757Image
on p.757

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Astrin S. M. Endogenous viral genes of the White Leghorn chicken: common site of residence and sites associated with specific phenotypes of viral gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Dec;75(12):5941–5945. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.12.5941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beug H., Graf T. Isolation of clonal strains of chicken embryo fibroblasts. Exp Cell Res. 1977 Jul;107(2):417–428. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(77)90363-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooper G. M., Temin H. M. Lack of infectivity of the endogenous avian leukosis virus-related genes in the DNA of uninfected chicken cells. J Virol. 1976 Feb;17(2):422–430. doi: 10.1128/jvi.17.2.422-430.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crittenden L. B., Astrin S. M. Independent segregation of ev 2 and ev 10, genetic loci for spontaneous production of endogenous avian retroviruses. Virology. 1981 Apr 15;110(1):120–127. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(81)90013-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crittenden L. B., Motta J. V., Smith E. J. Genetic control of RAV-O production in chickens. Virology. 1977 Jan;76(1):90–97. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(77)90285-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crittenden L. B., Wendel E. J., Motta J. V. Interaction of genes controlling resistance to RSV(RAV-O). Virology. 1973 Apr;52(2):373–384. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(73)90332-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haase A. T., Stowring L., Harris J. D., Traynor B., Ventura P., Peluso R., Brahic M. Visna DNA synthesis and the tempo of infection in vitro. Virology. 1982 Jun;119(2):399–410. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(82)90099-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hanafusa H., Miyamoto T., Hanafusa T. A cell-associated factor essential for formation of an infectious form of Rous sarcoma virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Jun;66(2):314–321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.66.2.314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hanafusa T., Hanafusa H., Miyamoto T. Recovery of a new virus from apparently normal chick cells by infection with avian tumor viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970 Dec;67(4):1797–1803. doi: 10.1073/pnas.67.4.1797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hughes S. H., Robinson H. L., Bishop J. M., Varmus H. E. The replication of subgroup E avian retroviruses is blocked at or before viral DNA synthesis in restrictive chicken cells. Virology. 1979 Dec;99(2):437–442. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(79)90025-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hughes S. H. Sequence of the long terminal repeat and adjacent segments of the endogenous avian virus Rous-associated virus 0. J Virol. 1982 Jul;43(1):191–200. doi: 10.1128/jvi.43.1.191-200.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Humphries E. H., Allen R., Glover C. Clonal analysis of the integration and expression of endogenous avian retroviral DNA acquired by exogenous viral infection. J Virol. 1981 Aug;39(2):584–596. doi: 10.1128/jvi.39.2.584-596.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Humphries E. H., Glover C., Weiss R. A., Arrand J. R. Differences between the endogenous and exogenous DNA sequences of Rous-associated virus-O. Cell. 1979 Nov;18(3):803–815. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90133-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jenkins N. A., Cooper G. M. Integration, expression, and infectivity of exogenously acquired proviruses of Rous-associated virus-O. J Virol. 1980 Dec;36(3):684–691. doi: 10.1128/jvi.36.3.684-691.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jolicoeur P., Rassart E. Effect of Fv-1 gene product on synthesis of linear and supercoiled viral DNA in cells infected with murine leukemia virus. J Virol. 1980 Jan;33(1):183–195. doi: 10.1128/jvi.33.1.183-195.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jolicoeur P., Rassart E. Fate of unintegrated viral DNA in Fv-1 permissive and resistant mouse cells infected with murine leukemia virus. J Virol. 1981 Feb;37(2):609–619. doi: 10.1128/jvi.37.2.609-619.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Linial M., Neiman P. E. Infection of chick cells by subgroup E viruses. Virology. 1976 Sep;73(2):508–520. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(76)90412-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Payne L. N., Pani P. K., Weiss R. A. A dominant epistatic gene which inhibits cellular susceptibility to RSV(RAV-O). J Gen Virol. 1971 Dec;13(3):455–462. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-13-3-455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Robinson H. L., Astrin S. M., Senior A. M., Salazar F. H. Host Susceptibility to endogenous viruses: defective, glycoprotein-expressing proviruses interfere with infections. J Virol. 1981 Dec;40(3):745–751. doi: 10.1128/jvi.40.3.745-751.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Robinson H. L., Eisenman R., Senior A., Ripley S. Low freqeuncy production of recombinant subgroup E avian leukosis viruses by uninfected V-15B chicken cells. Virology. 1979 Nov;99(1):21–30. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(79)90033-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Robinson H. L. Inheritance and expression of chicken genes that are related to avian leukosis sarcoma virus genes. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1978;83:1–36. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-67087-9_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Robinson H. L. Intracellular restriction on the growth of induced subgroup E avian type C viruses in chicken cells. J Virol. 1976 Jun;18(3):856–866. doi: 10.1128/jvi.18.3.856-866.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Robinson H. L., Lamoreux W. F. Expression of endogenous ALV antigens and susceptibility to subgroup E ALV in three strains of chickens (endogenous avian C-type virus). Virology. 1976 Jan;69(1):50–62. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(76)90193-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rovigatti U. G., Astrin S. M. Avian endogenous viral genes. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1983;103:1–21. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-68943-7_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith E. J., Crittenden L. B., Brinsfield T. H., Jr Status of the endogenous avian leukosis virus in resistant cells from a producing line. Virology. 1974 Oct;61(2):594–596. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(74)90293-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Smith E. J., Crittenden L. B. Segregation of chicken endogenous viral loci ev 7 and ev 12 with the expression of infectious subgroup E avian leukosis viruses. Virology. 1981 Jul 15;112(1):370–373. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(81)90645-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tsichlis P. N., Coffin J. M. Recombinants between endogenous and exogenous avian tumor viruses: role of the C region and other portions of the genome in the control of replication and transformation. J Virol. 1980 Jan;33(1):238–249. doi: 10.1128/jvi.33.1.238-249.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vogt P. K., Friis R. R. An avian leukosis virus related to RSV(O): properties and evidence for helper activity. Virology. 1971 Jan;43(1):223–234. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(71)90240-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang S. Y., Hayward W. S., Hanafusa H. Genetic variation in the RNA transcripts of endogenous virus genes in uninfected chicken cells. J Virol. 1977 Oct;24(1):64–73. doi: 10.1128/jvi.24.1.64-73.1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Weiss R. A., Payne L. N. The heritable nature of the factor in chicken cells which acts as a helper virus for Rous sarcoma virus. Virology. 1971 Aug;45(2):508–515. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(71)90351-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES