Abstract
Background
Ten years ago, there was a difference of opinion about the suitability of ventilated patients with end-stage cardiac failure for heart transplantation (HTX). Although guidelines at that time qualified mechanical ventilation as a contraindication, we thought those patients could be candidates for HTX. In the same period a number of other patients received a donor heart in our centre. In this article we describe the clinical course and survival after these procedures.
Methods
We performed a retrospective study using our post HTX database. All patients undergoing transplants in our hospital were selected. Patients underwent echocardiography, scintigraphy (MUGA), ergo-spirometry (VO2 peak), blood tests and completed a quality of life questionnaire (SF-36). All tests were completed in the 1st quarter of 2006.
Results
Eight patients were identified; three were mechanically ventilated at the time of HTX. All eight patients were treated according to the standard protocol. Repeated surveillance cardiac biopsies were taken. One patient died 3.5 years after HTX due to an acute myocardial infarction. Seven patients, including the three patients on a ventilator at the time of the HTX, are alive, resulting in a survival rate of 88%. The current median survival time is 126 months (range 55 to 184 months). All patients are in good cardiac condition. The SF-36 domains of social functioning and mental health show high scores, the average score of general health and vitality is moderate.
Conclusion
Survival of our eight transplanted patients after a median period of ten years was 88%, which is at least comparable with data from larger series. This finding suggests that HTX can be performed effectively and safely in a low volume centre. The finding that all three patients on a ventilator prior to HTX are alive is remarkable. It appears that mechanical ventilation is not always an absolute contraindication for HTX.
Keywords: heart transplantation, follow-up (longterm), quality of life
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Aaronson N. K., Muller M., Cohen P. D., Essink-Bot M. L., Fekkes M., Sanderman R., Sprangers M. A., te Velde A., Verrips E. Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1055–1068. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00097-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Billingham M. E., Cary N. R., Hammond M. E., Kemnitz J., Marboe C., McCallister H. A., Snovar D. C., Winters G. L., Zerbe A. A working formulation for the standardization of nomenclature in the diagnosis of heart and lung rejection: Heart Rejection Study Group. The International Society for Heart Transplantation. J Heart Transplant. 1990 Nov-Dec;9(6):587–593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brouwer M. H., Bams J. L., Van Den Berg M. P., Van Veldhuisen D. J., Ebels T. Succesvolle harttransplantatie bij langduring beademde patiënten. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1996 Nov 23;140(47):2353–2355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor David O., Edwards Leah B., Boucek Mark M., Trulock Elbert P., Deng Mario C., Keck Berkeley M., Hertz Marshall I. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-second official adult heart transplant report--2005. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005 Aug;24(8):945–955. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Verheugt F. W. Is harttransplantatie in Nederland alleen voor de 'happy few'? Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1996 Nov 23;140(47):2321–2322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ware J. E., Jr, Sherbourne C. D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473–483. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]