Abstract
The T cell costimulatory molecule ICOS regulates Th2 effector function in allergic airway disease. Recently, several studies with ICOS−/− mice have also demonstrated a role for ICOS in Th2 differentiation. To determine the effects of ICOS on the early immune response, we investigated augmenting ICOS costimulation in a Th2-mediated immune response to Schistosoma mansoni antigens. We found that augmenting ICOS costimulation with B7RP-1-Fc increased the accumulation of T and B cells in the draining lymph nodes post-immunization. Interestingly, the increased numbers were due in part to increased migration of undivided antigen-specific TCR transgenic T cells and surprisingly B cells, as well as non-TCR transgenic T cells. B7RP-1-Fc also increased the levels of the chemokines, CCL21 and CXCL13, in the draining lymph node, suggesting ICOS costimulation contributes to migration by direct or indirect effects on, dendritic cells, stromal cells and high endothelial venules. Further, the effects of B7RP-1-Fc were not dependent on immunization. Our data support a model in which ICOS costimulation augments the pool of lymphocytes in the draining lymph nodes leading to an increase in the frequency of potentially reactive T and B cells.
Keywords: Costimulation, Th1/Th2 cells, B cells, Rodent, Spleen and Lymph Nodes
INTRODUCTION
In 1999, the CD28 family of costimulatory molecules expanded with the discovery of ICOS (1). ICOS binds to the B7-like molecule B7RP-1 (B7h, GL50, LICOS, ICOSL) (2–7), which shares 20% identity with B7-1 and B7-2 and is expressed constitutively on APC. Initial studies in humans demonstrated that ICOS was found in the apical light zone of human tonsillar germinal centers, suggesting that ICOS was involved in T:B cell interactions (1). Subsequently, ICOS−/− mice were shown to have defects in T helper cell responses and humoral immunity (8–10). Providing evidence that this is a single receptor-ligand pair, the B7RP-1−/− mice have the same defects as ICOS−/− mice (11, 12). Both B7RP-1 and ICOS-deficient T cells have been shown to be defective in early T cell IL-4 production, due to decreased c-Maf transcription factor expression (12, 13). Further, after primary immunization both ICOS−/− and B7RP-1−/− mice have decreased levels of serum IgE, IgG1 and defective germinal center formation (8–11).
The data on humoral immunity in the ICOS−/− mice correlated with findings in humans who are ICOS deficient and suffer from common variable immunodeficiency (14). ICOS-deficient individuals were found to have profound defects in B cell maturation and immunoglobulin isotype switching. Initially no defects in T cell function were found. However, investigators have now demonstrated that ICOS-deficient individuals have a T cell defect in IL-10 production, as well as in IL-17 (15). These findings suggest that ICOS costimulation is necessary for the maintenance of a mature B cell compartment. A major role for the ICOS-B7RP-1 pathway in the T helper cell-dependent B cell responses has emerged and has been confirmed in humans.
A focus of our laboratory has been the role of ICOS in Th2-mediated diseases in both mice and humans (16, 17). We and others have published data that in vivo blockade of ICOS affects Th2 effector function (16, 18). However, ICOS−/− mice have a defect in Th2 differentiation and ICOS has been shown to play a role in the initial expansion of primary and activated T cells in both Th1 and Th2 immune responses (8–10, 19, 20). We hypothesized that ICOS-B7RP-1 interactions are most influential on Th2 cells after initial activation when ICOS is known to be highly expressed (1). We have found that increased ICOS costimulation with B7RP-1-Fc regulates Th2 dependent immune responses by augmenting the number of antigen-specific T cells in the secondary lymphoid tissue partially through increased migration. Moreover, we found that ICOS costimulation has a dramatic effect on the migration of B cells and non antigen-specific T cells into the lymph nodes. Surprisingly, the effect of B7RP-1-Fc on T and B cells does not require immunization, suggesting that ICOS costimulation affects homeostasis of the pool of T and B cells in the lymph nodes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Female C57BL/6 mice (4- to 6-week-old) were purchased from The Division of Cancer Treatment at the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD) or Charles River Laboratories Inc., (Frederick, MD). DO11.10 BALB/c TCR transgenic mice, which express a TCR specific for OVA peptide 323–329 presented in the context of I-Ad were bred in house (21). BALB/c and B6.Tcrb−/−Tcrd−/− mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). ICOS−/− mice were a generous gift of Richard Flavell (Yale University, School of Medicine, New Haven, CT), and were backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice. All animals were housed in a specific pathogen-free facility maintained by the University of Chicago Animal Resources Center (Chicago, IL). The studies detailed herein conform to the principles set forth by the Animal Welfare Act and the National Institutes of Health guidelines for the care and use of animals in biomedical research.
Flow Cytometry and Reagents
Prior to staining, cells were incubated with anti-FcR (2.4G2) hybridoma supernatant. Dead cells were excluded by the addition of propidium iodide (PI). All antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Diego, CA) with the exception of anti-CD4 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) and anti-KJ1-26, which was directly conjugated by the Flow Cytometry Facility, University of Chicago (Chicago, IL). Flow cytometry analysis was performed using a FACScan (Becton-Dickinson, Mountain View, CA), a FACSCalibur (Becton-Dickinson), or an LSRII (BD Biosciences). Data was analyzed using CellQuest software. B7RP-1-Fc and human-Fc were supplied by Amgen. OVA peptide 323–339 was produced by the University of Chicago Peptide Synthesis Facility.
Schistosoma mansoni
C57BL/6 mice were immunized i.p. on day 0 with 5 × 103 inactivated S. mansoni eggs. Mice received an i.p. injection of either 25µg HFc, or 50µg B7RP-1-Fc on days 7, 9, 11, and 13 after immunization.
Adoptive Transfer
Pooled spleen and lymph node cells from naïve TCR transgenic DO11.10 donor mice were used. In some experiments, donor cells were labeled with CFSE (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) prior to transfer as previously described (22). Prior to transfer, the percentage of CD4+ KJ1-26+ TCR transgenic T cells was determined by flow cytometry. 5 × 106 TCR transgenic T cells were injected into BALB/c mice 2 days prior to immunization. Recipient mice were sensitized s.c. on day 0 with 50 µg OVA peptide in alum. On days 7, 9, 11, 13 mice received an i.p. injection of either 25 µg HFc or 50 µg B7RP-1-Fc. Animals were sacrificed at indicated time-points during the experiment and TCR transgenic T cells were detected in draining lymph nodes by labeling with anti-CD4 and KJ1-26 antibodies.
Lymph node, lung and spleen restimulation ex vivo
Lungs were disassociated by agitating the tissue in digestion buffer containing hyaluronidase, (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), DNaseI (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany), and collagenase P (Boehringer Mannheim) as previously described (16). Cells were plated at 2 × 105 cells per well (lungs) or 4 × 105 cells per well (LN and spleen) in a 96-well U-bottom plate. T cell-depleted, irradiated splenocytes were mixed with lung cells at a 1:1 ratio. Cells were cultured with media alone or soluble egg antigen (SEA, 5 µg/ml). After 48 h, supernatants were analyzed by ELISA.
Cytokine and Chemokine Analysis
Cytokine production (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13 and IFN-γ) by lymph node, lung and spleen cultures was measured by ELISA according to the manufacturer’s protocol (BD Pharmingen or for IL-13, R&D Systems) or by Cytokine Bead Array (BD Pharmingen). For chemokine measurements, lymph nodes, lung, or spleen were placed into pre-weighed sterile tubes containing a solution of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, leupeptin, and aprotinin. Tubes were reweighed to calculate the weight of each tissue obtained. Tissues were then homogenized using a hand held homogenizer for approximately 20 seconds. Homogenized tissue was spun down for 10 minutes at 3000rpm and the supernatant was collected for chemokine analysis by ELISA (BD Pharmingen). Chemokine concentration measured in ng/ml was divided by the weight of the tissue in grams.
Statistical analysis
All statistics were done using an unpaired Student two-tailed t test (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001). Error bars represent SEM.
RESULTS
Augmenting ICOS costimulation increases effector cell migration to the lungs in the absence of challenge
Our previous work provided evidence that ICOS enhanced Th2 cell effector function in the lung (16). However, an important role for ICOS in the primary immune response has been established by several recent studies (9, 10, 19, 23). We hypothesized that ICOS-B7RP-1 interactions affect Th2 cells after initial activation. To induce a robust Th2 immune response, C57BL/6 mice were sensitized i.p. with inactivated S. mansoni eggs, and one week later the mice were treated with either B7RP-1-Fc or isotype control (HFc) every other day for one week and sacrificed on day 14 post sensitization (Fig. 1A). ICOS costimulation augmented the total numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the draining lymph nodes (DLN), and interestingly, the number of CD19+ B cells (Fig. 1B). In contrast, no effect on the number of lymphocytes was noted in the spleen or lung (Fig. 1, D and F).
FIGURE 1. B7RP-1-Fc treatment post sensitization expands the lymphocyte population in the DLN and the response to antigen in the lungs.
(A) After immunization with S. mansoni i.p., C57BL/6 mice were treated with 25 µg hFc (open bars, n=5) or 50 µg B7RP-1-Fc (black bars, n=5) at the time-points indicated (arrows). The total numbers of CD4+, CD8+ and CD19+ lymphocytes within the DLN (inguinal and aortic) (B), spleen (D) or lungs (F) were determined. Cytokine levels were measured from DLN, spleen and lung cells restimulated for 48 hours with SEA (C, E, and G). The data shown are representative of 3 independent experiments.
To evaluate the antigen-specific Th2 responses, ex vivo DLN, spleen and lung cells were re-stimulated with S. mansoni soluble egg antigen (SEA) in vitro and IL-5 production was measured. In the DLN cultures, spontaneous IL-5 production was significantly greater in the cultures from the B7RP-1-Fc treated animals compared to controls, but otherwise no differences were detected in the DLN or spleen (Fig. 1, C and E). No significant differences in either IFN-γ or IL-10 production were found (data not shown). Interestingly, cells from the lungs of B7RP-1-Fc treated mice produced significantly greater amounts of IL-5 when restimulated with SEA compared to controls (Fig. 1G). This was surprising since no differences in the total number of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells recovered from the lung tissue were found between the control group and the B7RP-1-Fc treated group (Fig. 1F). Further the mice were not challenged with antigen in the lung. Similar to the DLN cultures, spontaneous IL-5 production from cultures of lung lymphocytes from B7RP-1-Fc treated mice was also elevated when compared to the response from control mice (Fig. 1G). Thus ICOS costimulation augments the antigen-specific response in the lung even in the absence of local antigen challenge.
ICOS mediated costimulation increases both antigen specific and nonspecific populations within the DLN as a result of increased migration
While the data above suggested that ICOS costimulation increased the population of antigen responsive cells in vivo, it was not possible to track antigen specific cells in the S. mansoni model. To evaluate the specific T cell response, we used an adoptive transfer model of DO11.10 TCR transgenic T cells (Tg+) into BALB/c recipients. 5 × 106 Tg+CD4+ T cells were adoptively transferred to BALB/c mice on day −2. On day 0, recipient mice were immunized s.c. with OVA peptide in alum followed by injection of either B7RP-1-Fc or HFc starting on day 7 (Fig. 2). Mice were sacrificed on days 0, 4 and 7 prior to treatment and on days 11 and 14 post-treatment. The number of Tg+CD4+ T cells in the DLN peaked at day 4 and then declined in the control mice (Fig. 2A). However, in the B7RP-1-Fc treated mice the number of Tg+CD4+ T cells was significantly greater on day 14 compared to controls (Fig. 2B). Our data indicate that ICOS costimulation increases the number of antigen specific T cells within the DLN. Interestingly, a significant increase in total cell numbers within the DLN of mice treated with B7RP-1-Fc was also found (p=0.002) and could not be accounted for by an increase in Tg+CD4+ donor T cells alone. Further investigation determined that the numbers of non-Tg+CD4+ T cells and CD19+ B cells were increased (Fig. 2, C and D). As in the S. mansoni model, we found no significant differences in the spleen (data not shown). Our data indicate that the effects of increased ICOS costimulation with B7RP-1-Fc are not limited to antigen specific T cells but directly or indirectly influence antigen non-specific T cells and B cells.
FIGURE 2. B7RP-1-Fc treatment expands the number of cells within the lymph nodes in an adoptive transfer model.
BALB/c mice adoptively transferred with DO.11.10 cells were immunized s.c. with ova in alum. Mice were treated with B7RP-1-Fc or HFc as indicated in the figure. The total number of cells within the DLN (axillary) was determined. (A) Tg+ CD4+ T cells, (B) Tg+CD4+ T cells day 14 only, (C) non-transgenic CD4+ T cells, and (D) CD19+ cells are shown. Each time-point is the mean ± SEM of three to four mice per group except day 0 (n=2). The data are representative of three independent experiments.
The increase in T cell numbers by day 14 could be explained by an increase in proliferation or an increase in migration of cells to the DLN. To evaluate proliferation, total DO11.10 lymph node and spleen cells were labeled with CFSE prior to transfer. Thus CFSE-labeled non-transgenic CD4+ T cells and CD19+ B cells were also transferred. All of the donor cells were CFSE bright (undivided) prior to immunization on day 0 (data not shown). On day 14, the percentages of CFSE-Hi and CFSE-Lo Tg+CD4+ T cells were similar in both groups, suggesting that increased ICOS costimulation did not augment antigen-specific T cell proliferation (Fig. 3A). However, the total number of CFSE-Hi Tg+CD4+ T cells in the B7RP-1-Fc treated mice was significantly increased compared to the controls (Fig. 3B, upper panel). Further, the increase occurred between days 11 and 14, suggesting B7RP-1-Fc treatment prolonged the immune response. In addition, the number of CFSE-Lo Tg+CD4+ T cells in the DLN of the B7RP-1-Fc treated mice was also significantly increased compared to the controls (Fig. 3B, lower panel). Thus, our data suggest that ICOS costimulation can augment a Th2 immune response through increased T cell migration to the DLN without enhancing proliferation.
FIGURE 3. B7RP-1-Fc treatment post sensitization increases migration of T and B cells into the DLN.
BALB/c mice adoptively transferred with CFSE labeled DO.11.10 cells were immunized and treated with B7RP-1-Fc or HFc as in Figure 2. (A) Representative dot plot showing the division of Tg+CD4+ T cells into CFSEHi or CFSELo on day 14. (B) The total number of CFSEHi Tg+ CD4+ T cells (upper panel) and CFSELo Tg+ CD4+ T cells in treated mice (black bars) compared to controls (open bars). Percentage (C, E) and absolute numbers (D, F) of non-Tg+ CD4+ T cells and CD19+ B cells that were CFSEHi on day 14. Hatched bar = prior to treatment, open bars = HFc, black bars = B7RP-1-Fc. Each bar is the mean ± SEM of four mice. The data are representative of three independent experiments.
To determine if there was a generalized effect on cellular migration into the DLN, we evaluated the number of non-Tg+CD4+ T cells and CD19+ B cells that were CFSE-Hi (undivided). Strikingly, the numbers of undivided non-Tg+CD4+ T and CD19+ B cells were dramatically increased in the B7RP-1-Fc treated mice on day 14 (Fig. 3, D and F), while the percentages did not differ (Fig. 3, C and E). In both groups, while we cannot exclude the possibility of non-Tg+CD4+ T cells and CD19+ B cells having proliferated enough to be completely CFSE negative, a percentage of cells in both groups displayed minimal cell division, as a range of CFSE dilutions was not seen (Fig. 3, C and E). Thus, the data suggest that the increase in cell numbers within the lymph nodes in B7RP-1-Fc treated mice is due at least in part to increased migration of both antigen and non antigen-specific T cells, as well as B cells.
ICOS costimulation augments chemokine levels in the DLN
The major chemokine receptor on naïve T and B cells is CCR7, while the receptor CXCR5 is important for B cell homing within the lymph node (24, 25). CCL21 (SLC), one of the ligands for CCR7, is expressed by high endothelial venules, dendritic cells and stromal cells in the T cell areas of lymphoid tissue (26). CXCL13 (BLC), produced by stromal cells directs B cells to B cell follicles and is the ligand for CXCR5 (25). Since ICOS costimulation affected migration of both T and B cells into the draining lymph node, we postulated that the effects may be mediated through increased production of these chemokines. The levels of CCL21 and CXCL13 were measured in the supernatant of DLN, lung and spleen tissue homogenates prepared on day 14 of the adoptive transfer model described above. Both CCL21 and CXCL13 were significantly elevated in B7RP-1-Fc treated mice compared to controls in the DLN but not the lungs or spleen (Fig. 4). ICOS costimulation may directly or indirectly influence the production of chemokines known to mediate T and B cell homing within the lymph node.
FIGURE 4. Increased ICOS costimulation with B7RP-1-Fc post sensitization augments chemokine levels within the DLN but not spleen or lung.
CCL21 and CXCL13 levels in the cell lysates from B7RP-1-Fc treated mice (black bars) compared to control HFc treated mice (open bars) on Day 14. The mice were immunized and treated as described in Figure 2 and Figure 3. For CXCL13 the LN and lung are on the left axis and the spleen is on the right axis. The data are from three mice per group and are representative of two independent experiments.
B7RP-1-Fc increases T and B cells in the lymph nodes in the absence of immunization
In the adoptive transfer studies we found that both antigen-specific and non-specific T cells were increased in the DLN of mice treated with B7RP-1-Fc. The data suggested that augmenting ICOS costimulation may affect lymphocyte migration in the absence of antigen stimulation. We investigated the effects of B7RP-1-Fc treatment in B6 mice in the absence of immunization. Interestingly, after only two doses of B7RP-1-Fc i.p, increased numbers of T and B cells were found in the inguinal lymph nodes (Fig. 5A). The numbers of both CD4 and CD8 T cells were increased. The effect was specific to the lymph nodes, as no increases in cell numbers were found in the spleen (Fig. 5B). As a control, we evaluated the effect in ICOS−/− mice and found no differences between B7RP-1-Fc treated mice and controls (Fig. 5C). Further, in B6.Tcrb−/− Tcrd−/− mice the effect of B7RP-1-Fc was completely abrogated (Fig. 5D). In conclusion we find that B7RP-1-Fc costimulation of T cells augments the number of lymphocytes in the lymph nodes independent of immunization.
FIGURE 5. B7RP-1-Fc response does not require immunization.
C57Bl/6 mice were treated on days 0 and 2 with either B7RP-1-Fc (n=8) or HFc (n=8) i.p. On day 9 the number of CD4+, CD8+, and CD19+ lymphocytes was determined in the inguinal lymph nodes (A) and spleen (B). Data are from two independent experiments combined. The same protocol was repeated in (C) ICOS−/− mice, LN is shown (B7RP-1-Fc n=5; HFc n=4) and (D) TCR−/− mice, LN is shown (B7RP-1-Fc n=4; HFc n=3).
DISCUSSION
The discovery of ICOS as a costimulatory molecule primarily expressed on activated Th2 cells led to the hypothesis that ICOS was important for Th2 effector function. However, subsequent studies have determined the role of ICOS in the expansion of both Th1 and Th2 responses in vivo, as well as a major role in T cell dependent B cell responses. Yet, the mechanisms by which ICOS regulates the immune response are not entirely clear. In the current study we have found that augmenting ICOS costimulation with B7RP-1-Fc led to increased accumulation of T and B cells in the lymph nodes. The increased numbers were due at least in part to increased migration of undivided antigen-specific T cells and surprisingly, B cells and non-specific T cells. B7RP-1-Fc also increased the levels of the chemokines, CCL21 and CXCL13, suggesting ICOS costimulation contributes to migration by direct or indirect effects on dendritic cells, stromal cells and high endothelial venules. Interestingly, the effects of B7RP-1-Fc were not dependent on immunization.
Our data support a model in which ICOS costimulation augments the pool of lymphocytes in the lymph node leading to an increase in the number of potentially reactive T and B cells. The frequency of distinct antigen-specific CD4+ T cell clones in the mouse has recently been shown to be very low and has been suggested to be advantageous to maintaining a diverse repertoire (27). ICOS may increase the repertoire of antigen-specific lymphocytes migrating to the lymph node and tissue and increase the chances of a robust response. While our data suggested there was no effect of B7RP-1-Fc on T cell proliferation, ICOS may also increase the T cell pool in the lymph node by promoting T cell survival as recently reported (28). Further, the need for a “boost” from ICOS may be more apparent in instances of weak stimuli and may account for the differential dependence on ICOS in different Th2-mediated infectious parasite models (20, 29).
Interestingly, the effects of B7RP-1-Fc were not dependent on antigen sensitization. The T cells expressing the highest level of ICOS in the absence of activation are memory T cells and NK T cells (1, 30). Augmenting ICOS costimulation may stimulate memory T cells or NKT cells to directly or indirectly promote increased migration of T and B cells. It is also possible that B7RP-1 expressed on lymph node stromal cells costimulates T cells and plays a role in recruiting lymphocytes. While the effect may be due to a T cell receptor independent signal, we cannot rule out T cell activation with environmental antigens. Interestingly, mice transgenic for B7RP-1-Fc developed lymphoid hyperplasia and hypergammaglobulinemia as they aged, suggesting a response to environmental antigens is sufficient (5). However, the timing of our effect suggests a more acute role for ligation of ICOS on memory T cells in increasing the pool of lymphocytes in the lymph node.
After B7RP-1-Fc treatment, we found an increase in the chemokines CXCL13, the ligand for CXCR5, and CCL21, the ligand for CCR7. Our data suggest the mechanism by which B7RP-1-Fc augments the pool of lymphocytes in the lymph node and effector tissues are due to effects on chemokine production. Both germinal center B cells and follicular B helper T cells express CXCR5. ICOS has previously been shown to be highly expressed on follicular B helper T cells and to contribute to their development and function in vivo (31–37). While ICOS is not known to directly stimulate chemokine production, it is possible that T cell cytokines regulate the secretion of chemokines by the high endothelial venules, dendritic cells and stromal cells. TNF-α has been shown to affect lymphoid structure in tissues and germinal center formation (38, 39), suggesting TNF-α may regulate chemokine production. Interestingly, we have found in our mouse model of allergic airway disease that B7RP-1-Fc treatment augments the level of TNF-α in the airways (unpublished data). A possible mechanism for the increased migration of lymphocytes in our DO11.10 model is increased chemokine secretion, as a result of increased TNF-α in response to ICOS costimulation of T cells. A cell:cell contact mechanism between T cells and the chemokine producing cells may also be an underlying mechanism. Nevertheless, our data suggest that ICOS can regulate T:B interactions by augmenting migration of lymphocytes and enhancing the likelihood of an efficient B cell response. A greater understanding of how ICOS regulates the accumulation of T and B cells in the DLN, as well as at sites of inflammation, such as the lung, will provide insight into the mechanisms by which T cells perpetuate local immune responses in diseases like asthma and allergy.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank K. Blaine, B. Clay, D. Decker, E. Berry and Drs. P. Mody, J. Cannon, and J. Tong for helpful discussions and assistance during these studies.
Footnotes
This work was supported by National Institute of Health grants R01 AI50180 (A.I.S.) and K08 AI 059105 (R.A.S.) and a fellowship from the American Lung Association of Metropolitan Chicago (R.A.S.). M.D.A. was supported by a fellowship from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute undergraduate research program. The University of Chicago Flow Facility was supported in part by the University of Chicago Cancer Center National Institutes of Health grant CA14559.
Abbreviations used in this paper: SEA, soluble egg antigen; HFc, Human-Fc; LN, lymph node; DLN, draining lymph nodes; Tg+, DO11.10 TCR transgenic.
DISCLOSURES
A.A. Welcher is an employee of Amgen.
REFERENCES
- 1.Hutloff A, Dittrich AM, Beier KC, Eljaschewitsch B, Kraft R, Anagnostopoulos I, Kroczek RA. ICOS is an inducible T-cell co-stimulator structurally and functionally related to CD28. Nature. 1999;397:263–266. doi: 10.1038/16717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Swallow MM, Wallin JJ, Sha WC. B7h, a novel costimulatory homolog of B7.1 and B7.2, is induced by TNFa. Immunity. 1999;11:423–432. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80117-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Brodie D, Collins AV, Iaboni A, Fennelly JA, Sparks LM, Xu XN, van der Merwe PA, Davis SJ. LICOS, a primordial costimulatory ligand? Curr. Biol. 2000;10:333–336. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00383-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ling V, Wu PW, Finnerty HF, Bean KM, Spaulding V, Fouser LA, Leonard JP, Hunter SE, Zollner R, Thomas JL, Miyashiro JS, Jacobs KA, Collins M. Cutting edge: identification of GL50, a novel B7-like protein that functionally binds to ICOS receptor. J. Immunol. 2000;164:1653–1657. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.4.1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yoshinaga SK, Whoriskey JS, Khare SD, Sarmiento U, Guo J, Horan T, Shih G, Zhang M, Coccia MA, Kohno T, Tafuri-Bladt A, Brankow D, Campbell P, Chang D, Chiu L, Dai T, Duncan G, Elliott GS, Hui A, McCabe SM, Scully S, Shahinian A, Shaklee CL, Van G, Mak TW, et al. T-cell co-stimulation through B7RP-1 and ICOS. Nature. 1999;402:827–832. doi: 10.1038/45582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mages HW, Hutloff A, Heuck C, Buchner K, Himmelbauer H, Oliveri F, Kroczek RA. Molecular cloning and characterization of murine ICOS and identification of B7h as ICOS ligand. Eur. J. Immunol. 2000;30:1040–1047. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(200004)30:4<1040::AID-IMMU1040>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Aicher A, Hayden-Ledbetter M, Brady WA, Pezzutto A, Richter G, Magaletti D, Buckwalter S, Ledbetter JA, Clark EA. Characterization of human inducible costimulator ligand expression and function. J. Immunol. 2000;164:4689–4696. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.164.9.4689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dong C, Juedes Amy E., Temann UllaAngela, Shresta Sujan, Allison JamesP, Ruddle Nancy H., Flavell Richard A. ICOS co-stimulatory receptor is essential for T-cell activation and function. Nature. 2001;409:97–101. doi: 10.1038/35051100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.McAdam AJ, Greenwald Rebecca J., Levin Michele A., Chernova Tatyana, Malenkovich Nelly, Ling Vincent, Freeman Gordon J., Sharpe Arlene H. ICOS is critical for CD40-mediated antibody class switching. Nature. 2001;409:102. doi: 10.1038/35051107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tafuri A, Shahinian Arda, Bladt Friedhelm, Yoshinaga Steve K., Jordana Manel, Wakeham Andrew, Boucher Louis-Martin, Bouchard Denis, Chan Vera SF, Duncan Gordon, Odermatt Bernhard, Ho Alexandra, Itie Annick, Horan Tom, Whoriskey John S, Pawson Tony, Penninger Josef M, Ohashi Pamela S, Mak Tak W. ICOS is essential for effective T-helper-cell responses. Nature. 2001;409:105. doi: 10.1038/35051113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mak TW, Shahinian A, Yoshinaga SK, Wakeham A, Boucher LM, Pintilie M, Duncan G, Gajewska BU, Gronski M, Eriksson U, Odermatt B, Ho A, Bouchard D, Whorisky JS, Jordana M, Ohashi PS, Pawson T, Bladt F, Tafuri A. Costimulation through the inducible costimulator ligand is essential for both T helper and B cell functions in T cell-dependent B cell responses. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:765–772. doi: 10.1038/ni947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nurieva RI, Mai XM, Forbush K, Bevan MJ, Dong C. B7h is required for T cell activation, differentiation, and effector function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:14163–14168. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2335041100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nurieva RI, Duong J, Kishikawa H, Dianzani U, Rojo JM, Ho I, Flavell RA, Dong C. Transcriptional regulation of th2 differentiation by inducible costimulator. Immunity. 2003;18:801–811. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00144-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Grimbacher B, Hutloff A, Schlesier M, Glocker E, Warnatz K, Drager R, Eibel H, Fischer B, Schaffer AA, Mages HW, Kroczek RA, Peter HH. Homozygous loss of ICOS is associated with adult-onset common variable immunodeficiency. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:261–268. doi: 10.1038/ni902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Warnatz K, Bossaller L, Salzer U, Skrabl-Baumgartner A, Schwinger W, van der Burg M, van Dongen JJ, Orlowska-Volk M, Knoth R, Durandy A, Draeger R, Schlesier M, Peter HH, Grimbacher B. Human ICOS deficiency abrogates the germinal center reaction and provides a monogenic model for common variable immunodeficiency. Blood. 2006;107:3045–3052. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-07-2955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tesciuba AG, Subudhi S, Rother RP, Faas SJ, Frantz AM, Elliot D, Weinstock J, Matis LA, Bluestone JA, Sperling AI. Inducible costimulator regulates Th2-mediated inflammation, but not Th2 differentiation, in a model of allergic airway disease. J Immunol. 2001;167:1996–2003. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.4.1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shilling RA, Pinto JM, Decker DC, Schneider DH, Bandukwala HS, Schneider JR, Camoretti-Mercado B, Ober C, Sperling AI. Cutting edge: polymorphisms in the ICOS promoter region are associated with allergic sensitization and th2 cytokine production. J Immunol. 2005;175:2061–2065. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.4.2061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gonzalo JA, Tian J, Delaney T, Corcoran J, Rottman JB, Lora J, Al-Garawi A, Kroczek R, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Coyle AJ. ICOS is critical for T helper cell-mediated lung mucosal inflammatory responses. Nat Immunol. 2001;2:597–604. doi: 10.1038/89739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Smith KM, Brewer JM, Webb P, Coyle AJ, Gutierrez-Ramos C, Garside P. Inducible costimulatory molecule-B7-related protein 1 interactions are important for the clonal expansion and B cell helper functions of naive, Th1, and Th2 T cells. J Immunol. 2003;170:2310–2315. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.5.2310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wilson EH, Zaph C, Mohrs M, Welcher A, Siu J, Artis D, Hunter CA. B7RP-1-ICOS interactions are required for optimal infection-induced expansion of CD4+ Th1 and Th2 responses. J Immunol. 2006;177:2365–2372. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.4.2365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Murphy KM, Weaver CT, Elish M, Allen PM, Loh DY. Peripheral tolerance to allogeneic class II histocompatibility antigens expressed in transgenic mice: evidence against a clonal-deletion mechanism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1989;86:10034–10038. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.10034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lyons AB, Parish CR. Determination of lymphocyte division by flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 1994;171:131–137. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90236-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dong C, Temann UA, Flavell RA. Cutting edge: critical role of inducible costimulator in germinal center reactions. J Immunol. 2001;166:3659–3662. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.6.3659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Forster R, Schubel A, Breitfeld D, Kremmer E, Renner-Muller I, Wolf E, Lipp M. CCR7 coordinates the primary immune response by establishing functional microenvironments in secondary lymphoid organs. Cell. 1999;99:23–33. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80059-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Okada T, Ngo VN, Ekland EH, Forster R, Lipp M, Littman DR, Cyster JG. Chemokine requirements for B cell entry to lymph nodes and Peyer's patches. J Exp Med. 2002;196:65–75. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ebert LM, Schaerli P, Moser B. Chemokine-mediated control of T cell traffic in lymphoid and peripheral tissues. Mol Immunol. 2005;42:799–809. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.06.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Hataye J, Moon JJ, Khoruts A, Reilly C, Jenkins MK. Naive and memory CD4+ T cell survival controlled by clonal abundance. Science. 2006;312:114–116. doi: 10.1126/science.1124228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Burmeister Y, Lischke T, Dahler AC, Mages HW, Lam KP, Coyle AJ, Kroczek RA, Hutloff A. ICOS controls the pool size of effector-memory and regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 2008;180:774–782. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.2.774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Loke Pn, Zang X, Hsuan L, Waitz R, Locksley RM, Allen JE, Allison JP. Inducible costimulator is required for type 2 antibody isotype switching but not T helper cell type 2 responses in chronic nematode infection. PNAS. 2005;102:9872–9877. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503961102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Buonfiglio D, Bragardo M, Redoglia V, Vaschetto R, Bottarel F, Bonissoni S, Bensi T, Mezzatesta C, Janeway CA, Jr, Dianzani U. The T cell activation molecule H4 and the CD28-like molecule ICOS are identical. Eur J Immunol. 2000;30:3463–3467. doi: 10.1002/1521-4141(2000012)30:12<3463::AID-IMMU3463>3.0.CO;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Breitfeld D, Ohl L, Kremmer E, Ellwart J, Sallusto F, Lipp M, Forster R. Follicular B helper T cells express CXC chemokine receptor 5, localize to B cell follicles, and support immunoglobulin production. J Exp Med. 2000;192:1545–1552. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.11.1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schaerli P, Willimann K, Lang AB, Lipp M, Loetscher P, Moser B. CXC chemokine receptor 5 expression defines follicular homing T cells with B cell helper function. J Exp Med. 2000;192:1553–1562. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.11.1553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bonhagen K, Liesenfeld O, Stadecker MJ, Hutloff A, Erb K, Coyle AJ, Lipp M, Kroczek RA, Kamradt T. ICOS+ Th cells produce distinct cytokines in different mucosal immune responses. Eur J Immunol. 2003;33:392–401. doi: 10.1002/immu.200310013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ebert LM, Horn MP, Lang AB, Moser B. B cells alter the phenotype and function of follicular-homing CXCR5+ T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2004;34:3562–3571. doi: 10.1002/eji.200425478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Akiba H, Takeda K, Kojima Y, Usui Y, Harada N, Yamazaki T, Ma J, Tezuka K, Yagita H, Okumura K. The Role of ICOS in the CXCR5+ Follicular B Helper T Cell Maintenance In Vivo. J Immunol. 2005;175:2340–2348. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.4.2340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Rasheed AU, Rahn HP, Sallusto F, Lipp M, Muller G. Follicular B helper T cell activity is confined to CXCR5(hi)ICOS(hi) CD4 T cells and is independent of CD57 expression. Eur J Immunol. 2006;36:1892–1903. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bossaller L, Burger J, Draeger R, Grimbacher B, Knoth R, Plebani A, Durandy A, Baumann U, Schlesier M, Welcher AA, Peter HH, Warnatz K. ICOS Deficiency Is Associated with a Severe Reduction of CXCR5+CD4 Germinal Center Th Cells. J Immunol. 2006;177:4927–4932. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.7.4927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fu YX, Chaplin DD. Development and maturation of secondary lymphoid tissues. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;17:399–433. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ware CF. Network communications: lymphotoxins, LIGHT, and TNF. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:787–819. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





