Skip to main content
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research logoLink to Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
. 2008 Sep 26;1(Suppl 1):K2. doi: 10.1186/1757-1146-1-S1-K2

Sailing charted seas: biomechanics and the orthopedic surgeon

George A Arangio 1,
PMCID: PMC2562083

Introduction

Biomechanical models have been used to study the distribution of foot forces, metatarsal stresses, heel pad, arch height, plantar aponeurosis, subtalar joint, extrinsic muscles, medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy, subtalar arthroereisis and lateral column lengthening calcaneal osteotomy in the normal and flatfoot. We review past research data and discuss results as they relate to relevant clinical topics. [1-6]

Methods

A three dimensional multi-segment biomechanical model [7] was used with anatomical data from normal feet, feet made flat and corrected feet. The model includes a series of equations that describe how the foot deforms under a theoretical applied load of 683 Newtons (70 Kg.) on one foot in static stance phase

Results

Lateral Column Lengthening Calcaneal Osteotomy (LCL) decreases the forces needed by ligaments to resist moments at the medial arch joints by -79% and the talo-navicular Joint -63% in the flattened foot.

Table 1.

Moments in Newton-meters (N-m)

Joint Normal Nm Flatfoot Nm Flatfoot + LCL Nm
1st Metatarsal medial cuneiform 0.20 8.76 0.51
Medial – cuneiform navicular 0.33 14.48 0.84
Talo-navicular 5.61 21.63 8.05
(-63%)
Calcaneal-cuboid 5.69 0.00 7.72

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Cadaver Foot with calibrated cage and pointer for Direct Linear Transformation Photography illustrating LCL.

Conclusion

The model has accurately predicted the deformation of the foot under a theoretical load of 683 Newtons. We have analyzed the effect of various surgical procedures on the flatfoot. We discussed the clinical relevance of the model data to the ankle sprain, 5th metatarsal stress fracture, posterior tibial tendon insufficiency, the flatfoot and the cavus foot.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgement

Eric P Salathe Sr. PhD.

References

  1. Arangio GA, et al. Clin Biomech. 2007;22:472–477. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arangio GA, et al. Clin Biomech. 2004;19:847–852. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arangio GA, et al. Clin Biomech. 2001;16:539–539. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00011-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arangio GA, et al. Foot Ankle Int. 2000;21:216–220. doi: 10.1177/107110070002100306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Arangio GA, et al. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 1998;4:123–128. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9584.1998.00104.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Arangio GA, et al. Clin Orthop. 1997;339:227–231. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199706000-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Salathe EP, et al. J Biomech Eng. 2002;124:241–281. doi: 10.1115/1.1468865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES