Abstract
All stereoisomers of adenine and guanine methylene-3-fluoromethylenecyclopropane analogues of nucleosides 9a, 9b, 10a, 10b, 11a, 11b, 12a and 12b were synthesized and their antiviral activities were evaluated. A highly convergent approach permitted the synthesis of all these analogues using a single intermediate 15. Reaction of aldehyde 13 with fluorotrichloromethane and tri-n-butylphosphine gave fluoroalkenes 14a + 14b (83:17). Addition of carbene derived from ethyl diazoacetate gave cyclopropane 15 as the major product. Reduction (19), bromination (20) and phenylselenenylation (21) followed by Se-oxidation and β-elimination gave cis-methylenecyclopropane 22. Addition of bromine provided the reagent 23 for alkylation-elimination. Reaction of 23 with adenine led to isomeric mixture 25a + 26a which after deprotection afforded analogues 9a and 10a. The 2-amino-6-chloropurine furnished 25e + 26e and after deblocking (9e and 10e) and hydrolysis gave targets 9b and 10b. Intermediate 15 provided after debenzylation (27), 2-nitrophenylselenenylation (28), reduction (29), benzylation (30) and oxidation-elimination trans-methylenecyclopropane 31. Addition of bromine gave reagent 32. Further transformations followed the sequence outlined for analogues 9a, 9b, 10a and 10b. Analogue 9b was effective against HCMV (Towne) with EC50 2.9 μM. The trans-isomer 10b inhibited AD169 strain of HCMV (EC50 15 μM) and MCMV (EC50 2.5 μM). Compound 12a was effective against EBV (EC50 <0.03 μM). Analogue 9a inhibited VZV (EC50 5.9 μM) and HIV-1 (EC50 5.2 μM). Analogues 9a, 10a and 11a are moderate substrates for adenosine deaminase. The structure-activity relationships will be discussed in context with other methylenecyclopropane analogues.
Methylenecyclopropane analogues of nucleosides are antiviral agents effective especially against human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).2,3 The antiviral potency of the first generation series resides mostly in purine Z(cis)-isomers 1 (Chart 1) whereas the E(trans) isomers 2 and pyrimidine analogues are active only exceptionally. The second generation Z(cis) isomers 3 have a more narrow antiviral effect4–6 but the guanine analogue cyclopropavir (3, B = Gua) is effective in vivo7 and it is currently being developed as a potential drug against HCMV infections. As in the first generation series, the E(trans) isomers 4 lack anti-HCMV activity but some EBV potency has been noted.4,6
Chart 1.


Frequently, fluoro analogues of biologically active compounds have yielded effective agents in many areas of biology and biochemistry.8.9 For these reasons, we focused our attention on methylenecyclopropane analogues of nucleosides fluorinated in the cyclopropane moiety. In the previous work, we reported on 3,3-difluoromethylenecyclopropane analogues10 5 and 6 and, more recently, 2-fluoro substituted compounds11 7 and 8. Although activity of compounds 5 and 6 was limited to a moderate potency10 of the E(cis)-isomer 5a against HCMV, several Z(cis)- and E(trans)-isomers of the series 7 and 8 were effective11 against HCMV and EBV. Also, the methylene-3,3-difluorocyclopropanes 5 and 6 have limited stability10 which may have affected the biological activity but monofluoro compounds 7 and 8 are stable.11 It was then of interest to investigate the isomeric methylene-3-fluorocyclopropane analogues 9, 10, 11 and 12.
Synthesis
At the outset, it was clear that a convergent approach utilizing a single intermediate for synthesis of all anticipated analogues 9, 10, 11 and 12 would be most convenient. Such a key compound should comprise the fluorocyclopropane ring carrying two different but modifiable substituents at the remaining cyclopropane carbon atoms. The different fluorocyclopropane stereochemistry necessary for cis-fluoro analogues 9 and 10 vs. trans-isomers 11 and 12 could then be generated by manipulation of the cyclopropane substituents.
The synthesis of such a key intermediate, compound 15, is described in Scheme 1. Benzyloxyacetaldehyde 13 was converted to an isomeric mixture of fluoroalkenes 14a + 14b (Z/E = 83:17) in 68% yield by a modified Wittig reaction using fluorotrichloromethane and tri-n-butylphosphine in dichloromethane followed by alkaline hydrolysis.12 Addition of carbene13 derived from ethyl diazoacetate catalyzed by copper(II) acetylacetonate in dichloromethane gave a mixture of four cyclopropane stereoisomers 15, 16, 17 and 18 (65% conversion) and two unidentified fluorine containing components. The major stereoisomer 15 was formed by addition of carbene from a less hindered side of the double bond of the cis-isomer 14a. It was readily obtained by chromatography on a silica gel column in 42% yield. The other three stereoisomers 16, 17 and 18 were obtained as an unresolvable mixture identified by 19F NMR spectroscopy. Reduction of 15 with diisobutylaluminum hydride in tetrahydrofuran afforded hydroxymethylcyclopropane 19 (95%). Bromination using bromine - triphenylphosphine complex14 in dichloromethane gave crude bromomethylcyclopropane 20 (91%) which was, in turn, converted to phenylselenenylcyclopropane 21 in 94% yield using sodium phenylselenide generated in situ from diphenyl diselenide.5 Oxidation with 30% hydrogen peroxide was followed by β-elimination catalyzed by diisopropylethylamine in toluene10 at 80–85 °C to give methylenecyclopropane 22 (68%). Addition of bromine via pyridinium tribromide in dichloromethane afforded dibromide 23 (83%) obtained as a single stereoisomer of 95% isomeric purity. Alkylation-elimination protocol with adenine (K2CO3, DMF, 100–105 °C, 48 h) led to the alkylated product 24 and isomeric mixture of methylenecyclopropanes 25a + 26a. The elimination procedure was repeated with 24 to give additional 25a + 26a (total yield 46%). Finally, debenzylation with boron trichloride in dichloromethane at −78 °C furnished, after chromatographic separation, analogues 9a and 10a in 47% yield each. Alkylation-elimination with 2-amino-6-chloropurine and 23 under the conditions described for adenine isomers 25a + 26a gave isomeric mixture 25e + 26e (56%). Debenzylation gave the E- and Z-isomers 9e and 10e in 47% yield each. Hydrolysis with 80% formic acid afforded guanine analogues 9b and 10b (both in 95% yield).
Scheme 1.
The key intermediate 15 served also as a staring material for synthesis of the isomeric series 11 and 12 (Scheme 2). The O-debenzylation of 15 with boron trichloride in dichloromethane at −78 °C furnished hydroxyester 27 (83%). Reaction with 2-nitrophenyl selenocyanate and tri-n-butylphosphine in tetrahydrofuran (THF) using the procedure described10 for difluoro analogues 5 and 6 gave 2-nitrophenylselenenyl derivative 28 in 92% yield. Reduction with diisobutylaluminum hydride in THF afforded hydroxymethylcyclopropane 29 (95%). Benzylation with benzyl bromide using sodium hydride in THF led to intermediate 30 (71%). Oxidation with hydrogen peroxide in THF followed by β-elimination (see also Scheme 1, 21 → 22) provided methylenecyclopropane 31 (trans-isomer of 22 from Scheme 1) in 73% yield. Addition of bromine furnished dibromocyclopropane 32 (83%) obtained, in contrast to isomeric derivative 23, as a mixture of cis- and trans-isomers. Further transformations followed those described in Scheme 1 but the alkylation and elimination steps were separated. Alkylation of adenine (K2CO3, DMF, 25 – 40 °C) with 32 gave alkylated product 33a in 86% yield. β-Elimination was effected with K2CO3 in DMF at 100 °C to furnish E- and Z-isomers 34a and 35a which were separated by chromatography in 27 and 18% yield, respectively. The O-debenzylation afforded adenine analogues 11a and 12a (74 – 79%). The reaction sequence with 2-amino-6-chloropurine proceeded in a similar fashion: 32 → 33e (87%) → 34e and 35e (29 and 33%) → 11e and 12e (74% each). Hydrolysis then provided guanine analogues 11b and 12b in 73 – 76% yield.
Scheme 2.
Isomeric Structure of Analogues 9, 10, 11 and 12
A preliminary isomeric assignment of cis-and trans-alkene isomers 9 vs. 10 and 11 vs. 12 was made on the basis of chromatographic mobility that followed the pattern observed previously3 for other methylenecyclopropane analogues. The isomers 9 and 11 with a cis-configured base are faster moving than the respective trans-isomers 10 and 12. Although this “rule” may be of value for distinguishing cis- and trans-isomers at the alkene bond, it has little relevance for determining the cis- and trans-configuration at the cyclopropane moiety in 9 vs. 11 and 10 vs. 12. All these isomeric structures were readily established from 1H and 19F NMR spectra (Table 1). The chemical shifts of the cis-isomers of the purine H8, alkene H1′ and OH of 9a and 11a are all located downfield from the respective trans-isomers 10a and 12a. A similar deshielding pattern was observed previously10 for the corresponding 3,3-difluoromethylene analogues 5a and 6a. The 3JF,H coupling constants were then instrumental for isomeric assignment of the substituents in the cyclopropane moiety. The fluorine signals of isomers 9a and 10a with trans situated proton and fluorine appear as doublets with 3JF,H <1 Hz whereas compounds 11a and 12a having cis-configured protons exhibit 3JF,H 12.2 and 10.9 Hz, respectively. This is in accord with the general pattern in fluorocyclopropanes15 where the 3JF,H-cis are much larger than 3JF,H-trans. As expected, cis and trans located geminal fluorine atoms of difluoro analogues 5a and 6a also follow these trends.10 Similar relationships were observed for analogues containing bases other than adenine, compounds 9b, 10b, 9e and 10e. The 3JF,H‘s of a similar magnitude, <1 and 13.9 Hz, were also observed for cis- and trans-methylenecyclopropanes 22 and 31 lacking the heterocyclic bases.
Table 1.
Chemical shifts (δ) and coupling constants 3JF,H of the relevant 1H NMR signals of fluorinated methylenecyclopropanes 5a, 6a, 9a, 10a, 11a and 12a
| Compounda | H1′ | H8 | OH | 3JF,H (Hz) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5a | 8.19 | 8.68 | 5.39 | <1, 7.5 |
| 6a | 7.64 | 8.16 | 5.24 | <1, 6.3 |
| 9a | 7.89 | 8.72 | 5.2 | <1 |
| 10a | 7.55 | 8.35 | 5.03 | <1 |
| 11a | 7.93 | 8.71 | 5.17 | 12.2 |
| 12a | 7.57 | 8.34 | 5.00 | 10.9 |
DMSO-d6 as solvent. Values for 5a and 6a were taken from ref.10
The NOE experiments with analogues 9a, 10a, 11a and 12a confirmed these assignments (Table 2). As expected, in compounds 9a and 11a with a cis-configured adenine, the NOE enhancements were observed between the H8 and H4′ and OH and H8. In trans isomers 10a and 12a, an interaction between the H8 and H3′ was observed. The NOE enhancements between the cis-configured cyclopropane protons H3′ and H4′ were noted for analogues 9a and 10a but they were absent in 11a and 12a where this relationship is trans.
Table 2.
The NOE enhancements of relevant 1H NMR signals of 3-fluoromethylenecyclopropanes 9a, 10a, 11a and 12a
![]() | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compounda | Hiir | δ | Hobs | δ | NOE (%) |
| 9a | H8 | 8.72 | H4′ | 2.48 | 2.84 |
| H4′ | 2.48 | H8 | 8.72 | 2.20 | |
| OH | 5.21 | H8 | 8.72 | 1.98 | |
| H4′ | 2.48 | H3′ | 5.32, 5.49a | 1.87, 2.40 | |
| 10a | H8 | 8.35 | H3′ | 5.53, 5.70a | 2.47, 2.44 |
| H3′ | 5.53, 5.70a | H8 | 8.35 | 5.23, 3.67 | |
| H4′ | 2.37 | H3′ | 5.53, 5.70a | 3.33, 3.76 | |
| H3′ | 5.53, 5.70a | H4′ | 2.37 | 13.05, 12.57 | |
| 11a | H8 | 8.71 | H4′ | 2.60 | 1.54 |
| H4′ | 2.60 | H8 | 8.71 | 3.36 | |
| H8 | 8.71 | OH | 5.17 | 0.30 | |
| OH | 5.17 | H8 | 8.71 | 2.58 | |
| 12a | H8 | 8.34 | H3′ | 5.28, 5.45a | 1.08, 0.68 |
| H3′ | 5.28, 5.45a | H8 | 8.34 | 4.44, 2.33 | |
Doublets of the H3′ signals of 9a and 10a were treated separately as two singlets. Likewise, the doublets of doublets of 11a and 12a were treated as two doublets.
Biological Activity
Antiviral Activity
Analogues 9a, 9b, 10a, 10b, 11a. 11b, 12a and 12b were tested against the following viruses: human cytomegalovirus (HCMV), herpes simplex virus 1 and 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), varicella zoster virus (VZV), human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and hepatitis B virus (HBV). The results are summarized in Tables 3 and 4. Analogue 9b was active against HCMV/HFF (EC50/CC50 2.9/>100 μM) in Towne strain of the virus (Table 3) but it had little effect against the AD169 strain. Conversely, trans-isomer 10b was somewhat effective against HCMV/HFF in the AD169 strain (EC50/CC50 15/266 μM) and inactive against Towne strain. It was active with 2.5/>100 μM against the murine virus MCMV/MEF. Analogues 11a, 11b, 12a and 12b were without significant effect.
Table 3.
Inhibition of HCMV and HSV-1 replication by 3′-fluoromethylenecyclopropane analogues of nucleosides
| EC50/CC50 (μM) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | HCMV/HFF | HSV-1/BSC-1a | |
| Towneb,c | AD169d,e | ||
| 9a | 31/>100 | 44.3/>100 | 80/>100 |
| 10a | >100/>100 | >100/>100 | >100/>100 |
| 9b | 2.9/>100 | >12/>300 | 70/>100 |
| 10b | >100/>100 | 15/266b,f | 20/>100 |
| 11a | >100/>100 | 45/>300 | 20/>100 |
| 12a | >100/>100 | 285/>300 | 50/>100 |
| 11b | >100/>100 | >60/255 | >100/>100 |
| 12b | >100/>100 | >60/183 | >100/>100 |
| Control | 1.8/>100g | 0.15/>100g | 3.5/>100h |
ELISA. Cytotoxicity was determined in KB cells. All listed compounds were inactive against HSV-1 or HSV-2 in Vero (EC50/CC50 >50/>50 μM)b and HFF cells (EC50/CC50 >100/>100 μM)d culture.
Plaque reduction assay.
Visual cytotoxicity.
Cytopathic effect (CPE) inhibition assay.
Cytotoxicity by neutral red uptake.
Against MCMV/MEFb the EC50/CC50 was 2.5/>100 μM. Because of a lack of significant potency against HCMV/AD169, other compounds listed in Table 1 were not tested.
Ganciclovir.
Acyclovir.
Table 4.
Inhibition of EBV, VZV, HIV-1 and HBV replication by 3′-fluoromethylene-cyclopropane analogues of nucleosides
| EC50/CC50 (μM) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | EBV | ||||
| Daudia | H-1b,c | VZV HFFd,e | HIV-1LAI MT-2d | HBV2.2.15b,c | |
| 9a | >50/>50 | >20/>100 | 5.9f | 5.2/>10 | >20 |
| 10a | >50/>50 | >20/>100 | 54.6f | >10/>10 | >20 |
| 9b | >100/>100 | 13/74 | >100f | >10/>10 | >20 |
| 10b | >100/>100 | >20/>100 | 68.3f | >10/>10 | >20 |
| 11a | >100/>100 | >10/9 | 33.6f | >10/>10 | >10 |
| 12a | <0.03/>100 | >10/>100 | >60 | >10/>10 | >10 |
| 11b | >100/>100 | >30/>100 | >100 | >10/>10 | >30 |
| 12b | 91.6/>100 | >30/>100 | >60 | >10/>10 | >30 |
| Control | 0.33/>100g | 5h | 0.03g | 0.02/>10i | 0.02/>100j |
Viral capsid antigen (VCA) ELISA.
DNA hybridization assay.
Cytotoxicity was determined in CEM cells.
Cytopathic effect (CPE) assay.
Only the EC50 values are listed, for CC50‘s see HCMV(AD169)/HFF in Table 1.
Plaque reduction assay.
Acyclovir.
Ganciclovir.
AZT.
Lamivudine.
Moderate antiviral effects were detected by ELISA against HSV-1/BSC-1. The most potent compounds 10b and 11a had EC50/CC50 20/>100 μM. Against EBV/Daudi (VCA-ELISA), the trans-isomer 12a was the most effective analogue with EC50/CC50 <0.03/>100 μM but it was devoid of potency in H-1 cells as determined by DNA hybridization assay (Table 4).
Under the latter conditions, guanine analogue 9b was moderately active with EC50/CC50 13/74 μM. It was inactive in Daudi cells. The adenine analogue 9a was the most potent compound against VZV/HFF with EC50/CC50 5.9/>100 μM and it also inhibited HIV-1/MT-2 (EC50/CC50 5.2/>10 μM). The tested compounds were inactive against HBV in 2.2.15 cells and they were non-cytotoxic with the exception of analogue 11a with CC50 9 μM in CEM cells.
The analogues described herein conclude the first generation of methylenecyclopropanes 1 and 2 with a single fluorine atom in the cyclopropane moiety. Therefore, some generalizations regarding the structure-activity relationships of antiviral activity in this whole series of compounds can be made. The antiviral activity of the purine methylenecyclopropane analogues with a cis configuration of the nucleobase follows approximately the order 1 > 7 > 9 > 11 > 5. Introduction of the fluorine appears to narrow the antiviral effects.10,11 Two geminal fluorines (5a, 5b, 6a and 6b) decrease the chemical stability of the analogues.10 Compounds with a trans-configured nucleobase 10 and 12 were mostly devoid of significant antiviral activity. Strong potency, sometimes in submicromolar range, was detected against EBV/Daudi by VCA-ELISA but it was not always reproduced in DNA hybridization assays. Analogues 8a, 8b, 8c (ref.11) and 12a serve as examples. It is likely that the mechanism of action of active analogues of this series follows the conversion to the corresponding triphosphates which then inhibit the relevant DNA polymerase or reverse transcriptase. This was documented16 for non-fluorinated analogues 1 and 2.
Adenosine Deaminase (ADA)
Adenine fluoroanalogues 9a, 10a, 11a and 12a were investigated as substrates for adenosine deaminase from calf intestine. Whereas compounds 9a, 10a and 11a are moderate substrates which were about 50% deaminated after 24 h, analogue 12a was resistant to deamination up to 48 h.
Experimental Section
General Methods
The UV spectra were measured in ethanol and NMR spectra were determined at 300 or 400 MHz (1H), 75 or 100 MHz (13C) and 376 MHz (19F). For 19F NMR CFCl3 was used as a reference. For atom numbering of 3-fluoromethylenecyclopropane analogues see Table 2, formula 9a. Mass spectra were determined in electron-impact (EI-MS) or electrospray ionization (ESI-MS, methanol - NaCl) mode. Benzyloxyacetaldehyde17 (13) and 2-nitrophenyl selenocycanate18 were prepared as described. For the nomenclature of compounds with a double cis-trans isomerism in the cyclopropane ring an r,c,t system19 was adopted. The substituents were denoted as follows: r (reference), c (cis) and t (trans). Adenosine deaminase from calf intestine, X6B8577, 19.8 units/mg solid, was the product of Worthington, Lakewood, New Jersey.
(Z,E)-1-Benzyloxymethyl-2-fluoroethene (14a + 14b)
Tributylphosphine (205 mL, 0.825 mmol) was added dropwise with stirring at 0 °C to a mixture of CH2Cl2 (270 mL) and CFCl3 (25.7 mL, 0.275 mol). The stirring was continued for 1 h at 0 °C and then 3 h at rt. Benzyloxyacetaldehyde17 (13, 33.3 g, 0.22 mol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) was added at 0 °C with stirring which was continued for 16 h at rt. Sodium hydroxide solution (10%, 330 mL) was then added and the stirring was continued for 24 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to 0 °C and the pH was adjusted to 5.0 by a careful addition of HCl. The organic phase was separated, it was washed with 5% HCl (5%, 2 × 150 mL) and dried over MgSO4. The solvents were removed in vacuo, the residue was dissolved in hexanes and the solution was filtered through a silica gel pad. After removal of hexanes, the crude product was chromatographed on a silica gel column in hexanes to hexanes - Et2O (40:1) to give Z- and E-isomers 14a and 14b (25.2 g, yield 68%, 83% 14a and 17% 14b as determined by 19F NMR) as a colorless oil which was of sufficient purity to be used in the next step. 1H NMR (CDCl3) d 3.98 (dt, J = 7.2, 1.6 Hz, 14b), 4.22 (dt, 2H, J = 7.2, 2.0 Hz, 14a, CH2O), 4.54 (s, 14b), 4.56 (s, 2H, CH2Ph, 14a), 5.09 (ddt, J = 42.0, 7.2, 4.8 Hz, 14a), 5.60 (ddt, 1H, J = 18.4, 11.2, 7.2 Hz, 1H, 14b, CH=), 6.67 (ddd, J = 84.4, 4.8, 1.6 Hz, 14a), 6.75 (ddd, 1H, J = 83.6, 11.2, 1.6 Hz, 14b, CHF=), 7.36 (m), 7.41 (m, 5H, Ph). 13C NMR 61.9 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 14a), 64.8 (d, J = 14.2 Hz), 14b, CH2O), 72.2 (14b), 72.5 (14a, CH2Ph), 108.5 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 14a), 108.9 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 14b, CH=), 128.0 (14a), 128.1 (14b), 128.2 (14a, 14b), 128.7 (14a), 128.8 (14b), 138.2 (14b,) 138.4 (14a, Ph), 149.9 (d, J = 261.9 Hz, 14a), 152.1 (d, J = 261.2 Hz, 14b, CHF=). 19F NMR −126.07 (dd, J = 83.9, 44.4 Hz, 14a), −125.54 (ddt, J = 83.9, 18.1, 3.0 Hz, 14b). EI-MS 166 (M, 3.0), 165 (M − H, 4.2), 91 (PhCH2, 100.0). EI-HRMS calcd for C10H11OF 166.0794, found 166.0791.
Ethyl t-2-Benzyloxymethyl-t-3-fluorocyclopropane-r-1-carboxylate (15)
Ethyl diazoacetate (11.5 g, 100 mmol) was added to a refluxing solution of 14a + 14b (16.0 g, 96.38 mmol) and copper acetylacetonate (0.75 g, 2.87 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (120 mL) using a syringe pump (0.34 mL/h) with stirring. The stirring was continued for 1 h, solvent was evaporated and the residue was put on a silica gel column which was eluted with hexane - EtOAc (100:0 to 10:1) to give unreacted 14a + 14b (5.6 g, 35%) followed by a mixture of products. Solvents were evaporated, the residue was dissolved in ether (150 mL) and KMnO4 (15 g) in water (60 mL) was added with external ice-cooling and stirring to remove unsaturated impurities. The stirring was continued for 6 h and excess KMnO4 was removed by addition of solid Na2S2O3. The mixture was filtered through a short silica gel pad which was eluted with ether. The organic phase was washed successively with saturated NaHCO3 (2 × 50 mL), water (2 × 50 mL) and it was dried over MgSO4, The crude product was chromatographed on a silica gel column in hexane - Et2O, 50:1 to give a faster moving isomer 15 as a colorless oil (6.65 g, 42%). The slower moving fraction was an inseparable mixture consisting of the three remaining isomers 16, 17, 18 and two unidentified fluorine-containing impurities.
Isomer 15
1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.26 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH3), 1.91 – 1.99 (m, 2H, H2, H1), 3.78 – 3.58 (2 partly overlapped AB’s, 2H, CH2OBn), 4.08 (2q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2 of Et), 4.52, 4.59 (AB, 2H, J = 11.7 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.92 (ddd, 1H, J = 63.2, 5.6, 2.4 Hz, H3), 7.28–7.36 (m, 5H, Ph). 13C NMR 14.4 (CH3), 24.9 (d, J = 12.7 Hz, C1), 26.3 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, C2), 61.3 (CH2 of Et), 65.6 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH2OBn), 73.0 (CH2Ph), 76.1 (d partly overlapped with CDCl3, J = 230.5 Hz, C3), 127.95, 127.98, 128.7, 138.2 (Ph), 170.7 (C=O). 19F NMR −220.05 (ddd, J = 64.0, 18.1, 7.5 Hz). EI-MS 252 (M, 5.1), 91 (PhCH2, 100.0). EI-HRMS calcd for C14H17FO3 252.1162, found: 252.1164. Anal. C14H17FO3 (C, H).
Ethyl c-2-Benzyloxymethyl-c-3-fluorocyclopropane-r-1-carboxylate (16)
19F NMR (CDCl3) −232.66 (dt, J = 65.5, 9.0 Hz).
Ethyl t-2-Benzyloxymethyl-c-3-fluorocyclopropane-r-1-carboxylate (17)
19F NMR (CDCl3) −220.66 (ddd, J = 64.0, 18.1, 7.5 Hz).
Ethyl c-2-Benzyloxymethyl-t-3-fluorocyclopropane-r-1-carboxylate (18)
19F NMR (CDCl3) −205.84 (dt, J = 64.0, 18.4 Hz).
t-2-Benzyloxymethyl-t-3-fluorocyclopropyl-r-1-methanol (19)
Diisobutylaluminum hydride (DIBALH) in hexanes (1M, 45.80 mL, 45.80 mmol) was added to a solution of ester 15 (4.62 g, 18.33 mmol) in hexane (40 mL) with stirring at 0 °C during 10 min under N2. The stirring was continued for 1 h. The reaction was quenched by a dropwise addition of HCl (5%, 50 mL) and then it was extracted with ether (4 × 30 mL). The organic phase was washed successively with saturated NaHCO3 (2 × 30 mL) and water (2 × 30 mL). The solvents were evaporated and the residue was chromatographed on a silica gel column in hexanes -EtOAc = 10:1 to 5:1 to give compound 19 as a colorless oil (3.66 g, 95%). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.18 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.0, 6.6 Hz, H2), 1.34 (dddd, 1H, J = 22.0, 13.6, 6.4, 1.6 Hz, H1), 2.95 (bs, 1H, OH), 3.33 (m, 1H), 3.31–3.46 (m, 1H, CH2OH), 3.57–3.71(m, 2H, CH2OBn), 4.50 (ddd, 1H, J = 64.0, 6.4, 2.4 Hz, H3), 4.44, 4.60 (split AB partly overlapped with H3, 2H, CH2Ph), 4.52 (ddd partly overlapped with CH2Ph, 1H, J = 63.6, 6.0, 2.1 Hz, H3), 7.28–7.36 (m, 5H, Ph). 13C NMR 21.6 (d, J = 10.5 Hz), 25.1 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, C1′, C2), 61.8 (CH2OH), 67.3 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, CH2OBn), 73.0 (CH2Ph), 75.1 (d, J = 223.5 Hz, C3), 128.0, 128.1, 128.7, 138.3 (Ph). 19F NMR −223.80 (ddd, J = 64.0, 21.5, 4.5 Hz). EI-MS 210 (M, 1.2), 91 (PhCH2, 100.0). EI-HRMS calcd for C12H15FO2 210.1056, found: 210.1057. Anal. C12H15FO2 (C, H).
t-2-Benzyloxymethyl-t-3-fluoro-r-1-bromomethylcyclopropane (20)
Bromine (2.60 g, 16.24 mmol) was added with stirring to a solution of PPh3 (4.65 g, 17.71 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) over 20 min maintaining the temperature below −30 °C. Compound 19 (3.10 g, 14.76 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (8 mL) was then added dropwise and the mixture was allowed to warm to rt. It was diluted with hexanes (150 mL) whereupon it was filtered through a silica gel plug (10 g). The plug was washed with hexanes - ethyl acetate (30:1, 150 mL) and the combined filtrates were evaporated to provide compound 20 as a colorless oil containing <10% PPh3 (3.65 g, 91%). This product was used for preparation of phenylselenenyl derivative 21.
The experiment performed on a 1-mmol scale of 19 gave after chromatography on a silica gel column in hexanes - Et2O (50:1 to 30:1) compound 20 (250 mg, 92%). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.32 (ddd, J = 12.0, 6.0, 2.0 Hz, 1H, H2), 1.60 (dddd, J = 21.6, 10.8, 6.4, 2.0 Hz, 1H, H1), 3.28 (dd, 2H, J = 7.6, 2.0 Hz, CH2Br), 3.55 (poorly resolved dd, 1H), 3.77 (poorly resolved ddd, 1H, CH2OBn), 4.54, 4.60 (AB, 2H, J = 12.2 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.56 (ddd, 1H, J = 63.0, 6.0, 1.6 Hz, H3), 7.30–7.37 (m, 5H, Ph). 13C NMR 25.2 (d, J = 11.2), 26.6 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, C1, C2), 32.8 (CH2Br), 66.6 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH2OBn), 72.9 (CH2Ph), 77.6 (d, J = 226.8 Hz, C3), 128.0, 128.1, 128.7, 138.4 (Ph). 19F NMR −219.63 (ddd, J = 64.0, 20.0, 5.6 Hz). ESI-MS (MeOH - KOAc) 311, 313 (M + K, 92.8 and 100.0). Anal. C12H14BrFO (C, H).
t-2-Benzyloxymethyl-t-3-fluoro-r-1-(phenylselenenylmethyl)cyclopropane (21)
Ph2Se2 (1.71 g, 5.50 mmol) was refluxed in ethanol (25 mL) till a clear solution was obtained. After cooling, NaOH (4M, 2.75 mL, 11 mmol) was added followed by NaBH4 (0.835 g, 11 mmol). The reaction mixture was refluxed for 30 min and then it was cooled again to rt. A solution of compound 20 (3.0 g, 11 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL) was slowly added with stirring. After 3 h, water (125 mL) was added, the mixture was extracted with EtOAc, the organic phase was dried (MgSO4) and concentrated. The residue was chromatographed on a silica gel column in hexane - EtOAc (30:1) to give compound 21 (3.63 g, 94%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.20 (dd, J = 14.0, 6.4 Hz, H2), 1.35–1.46 (m, 1H, H1), 2.75–2.90 (poorly resolved 2 AB’s, 2H, CH2SePh), 3.49 (poorly resolved dd, 1H), 3.72 (dd, 1H, J = 10.4, 5.6 Hz, CH2OBn), 4.47 (poorly resolved dd, 1H, J = 63.2, 6.8 Hz, H3), 4.52, 4.59 (AB, 2H, J = 12.0 Hz, CH2Ph, partly overlapped with H3), 7.29–7.34 (m, 4H), 7.37 (bd, 4H), 7.56–7.58 (m, 2H, 2 × Ph). 13C NMR 23.3, 25.8 (2d, J =10.5 Hz, C1, C2), 28.3 (CH2SePh), 67.1 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, CH2OBn), 72.8 (CH2Ph), 77.8 (d, J = 227.6 Hz, C3), 127.6, 127.9, 128.0, 128.7, 129.4, 129.6, 133.8, 138.6 (2 × Ph). 19F NMR −219.63 (ddd, J = 64.0, 21.5, Hz, < 1 Hz). EI-MS 350, 348 (M, 1.90, 0.87), 91 (PhCH2, 100.0). EI-HRMS calcd for C18H19FO80Se for 350.0585, found: 350.0585. Anal. C18H19FOSe (C, H).
cis-2-(Benzyloxymethyl)-3-fluoro-1-methylenecyclopropane (22)
Hydrogen peroxide (30%, 11.19 mL, 98.7 mmol) was added dropwise with stirring to a solution of compound 21 (3.49 g, 10 mmol) in THF (30 mL) at −60 °C. The mixture was allowed to warm to rt. After 14 h, water (100 mL) and EtOAc (100 mL) were added, the organic phase was washed with NaHCO3 (5%) and water, it was dried (MgSO4) and the solvents were evaporated. The residue was dissolved in toluene (15 mL), diisopropylethylamine (3.50 mL, 20 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at 80–85 °C for 2 h. After removal of solvents, the crude product was chromatographed on silica gel in hexanes - EtOAc (30:1) to give compound 22 (1.30 g, 68%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.08–2.17 (m, 1H, H2), 3.60 (poorly resolved dd, 1H), 3.82 (ddd, 1H, J = 10.7, 5.6, 1.2 Hz, CH2OBn), 4.56, 4.63 (AB, 2H, J = 12.0 Hz, CH2Ph), 5.08 (dd, 1H, J = 69.0, 7.5 Hz, H3), 5.66, 5.90 (2 poorly resolved t, 2H, CH2=), 7.30–7.39 (2m, 5H, Ph). 13C NMR 23.9 (d, J = 15.1 Hz, C2), 66.5 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, CH2OBn), 69.3 (d, J = 231.7 Hz, C3), 72.8 (CH2Ph), 110.8 (J = 3.0 Hz, CH2=), 130.9 (C1), 127.9, 128.0, 128.6, 138.6 (Ph). 19F NMR −218.27 (dd, J = 68.9, < 1 Hz). EI-HRMS calcd for C12H13FO 192.0950, found: 192.0955. Anal. C12H13FO (C, H).
r-2-Benzyloxymethyl-c or t-1-bromo-c or t-1-bromomethyl)-c-2-fluorocyclopropane (23)
Pyridinium tribromide (3.20 g, 10.24 mmol) was added with stirring to a solution of compound 22 (1.2 g, 6.25 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (50 mL) at −78 °C. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to rt. After 16 h, it was diluted with EtOAc (100 mL) and the resultant solution was washed sequentially with saturated Na2S2O3, NaHCO3 and water. The organic phase was dried over MgSO4 and the solvents was evaporated. The crude product was chromatographed on a silica gel column in hexanes - Et2O (40:1) to afford compound 23 (1.82 g, 83%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.52–1.60 (m, 1H, H2), 3.6–3.80 (cluster of m, 4H, CH2Br and CH2OBn), 4.47 (dd, 1H, J = 64.0, 7.6 Hz, H3), 4.58 (s, CH2Ph), 7.30–7.37 (cluster of m, 5H, Ph). 13C NMR 29.1 (d, J = 9.7 Hz, C2), 38.8 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, C1), 40.5 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, CH2Br), 66.9 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, CH2OBn), 73.3 (CH2Ph), 74.6 (d, J = 235.8 Hz, C3), 128.04, 128.06, 128.7, 138.1 (Ph). 19F NMR −213.89 (dd, J = 64.0, 9.0 Hz)20. ESI-MS (MeOH + KOAc) 389, 391, 393 (M + K, 52.7, 100.0, 51.8). Anal. C12H13Br2FO (C, H).
(Z,E)-9-{[cis-(3-Fluoro-2-benzyloxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl}adenine (25a + 26a) and c or t-9-{[c or t-1-Bromo-c-3-fluoro-r-2-(benzyloxymethyl)cyclopropyl]methyl}adenine (24)
A mixture of adenine (287 mg, 2.2 mmol), compound 23 (704 mg, 2.0 mmol) and K2CO3 (1.66 g, 12.0 mmol) in DMF (10 mL) was stirred under N2 for 4 h at 40 °C and then at 100–105 °C for 45 min. The mixture was rapidly cooled to −78 °C and then it was allowed to warm to rt. The insoluble solid was filtered off using a silica gel pad (5 g) which was washed with DMF (70 mL). The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, the residue was chromatographed on a silica gel column in EtOAc - MeOH (40:1 to 30:1) to give the faster moving E,Z-isomeric mixture 25a + 26a and slower moving intermediate 24 (490 mg, 1.21 mmol). The elimination procedure was repeated with 24 using K2CO3 (0.83 g, 6 mmol) and DMF (5.0 mL). The product was chromatographed as described above to give Z,E-mixture 25a + 26a and bromo derivative 24 (120 mg, 14.8%). Both portions of 25a + 26a were combined and they were rechromatographed in EtOAc - MeOH (50:1 to 30:1) to give E,Z-isomers 25a + 26a (300 mg, 46%, E/Z = 1:1).
E,Z-isomers 25a + 26a
Mp 166–170 °C. UV λmax 237 nm (ε 25,700), 280 (ε 8,500). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.46 (bm, 1H, H4′), 3.68, 3.85 (2m, 2H, H5′), 4.47–4.63 (m, 2H, OCH2Ph), 5.21, 5.37 (2 partially overlapped dd, J = 69.0, 69.6, 6.4 Hz, 1H, H3′), 6.50, 6.53 (2s, 2H, NH2), 7.26–7.36 (m, 5H, Ph), 7.59, 7.98 (2bs, 1H, H1′), 8.38, 8.20, 8.75 (3s, 2H, H2 and H8). 19F NMR −214.83 and −215.88 (2d, J = 70.0, <1Hz). EI-MS 325 (M, 0.36), 91 (100.0). ESI-MS (MeOH) 326 (M + H, 100.0). EI-HRMS calcd for C17H16N5FO 325.1339, found: 325.1339.
Compound 24
Mp 161–163 °C. UV λmax 209 nm (ε 21,800), 261 (ε 12,200). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.79–1.87 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.65–3.75 (m, 2H, H5′), 4.36–4.52 (overlapped m of CH2Ph and H1′, 4H), 4.92 (dd, 1H, J = 64.0, 7.2 Hz, H3′), 5.85 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.26–7.36 (m, 5H, Ph), 8.02, 8.32 (2s, 2H, H2, H8). 13C NMR 26.9 (d, J = 10.5 Hz, C4′), 39.1 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, C2′), 51.9 (C1′), 66.5 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, C5′), 73.1 (d, J = 234.2 Hz, C3′), 73.2 (CH2 of Bn), 119.7 (C5), 127.9, 128.0, 128.7, 138.0 (Ph), 140.9 (C8), 150.4 (C4), 153.4 (C2), 155.8 (C6). 19F NMR −216.85 (ddd, J = 64.0, 9.2 Hz). ESI-MS 406, 408 (M + H, 97.0, 100.0).
(E)-9-{[cis-(3-Fluoro-2-hydroxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl}adenine (9a) and (Z)-9-{[cis-(3-Fluoro-2-hydroxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl}adenine (10a)
Boron trichloride (1M in CH2Cl2, 4.44 mL, 4.44 mmol) was added to a solution of the Z,E-isomers 25a + 26a (200 mg, 0.555 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (40 mL) at −78 °C under N2 over 10 min with stirring. The stirring was continued for 5 h at −78°C whereupon the reaction was quenched with methanol (20 mL) and NaHCO3 (4.0 g, 47.6 mmol). After 20 min, the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to rt and it was stirred for 4 h. The insoluble solid was filtered off using a short silica gel pad (3.5 g) which was washed with CH2Cl2 - MeOH (2:1, 60 mL). After removal of solvents, the residue was chromatographed on a silica gel column in hexanes - EtOAc (1.5:1 to 1:1) to give the E- isomer 9a (70 mg, 46.5%) followed by Z-isomer 10a (70 mg, 46.5%).
E-Isomer 9a
Mp 243–245 °C. UV max λmax 237 nm (ε 24,500), 280 (ε 8,300). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 2.48 (overlapped with DMSO-d5, H4′), 3.69 (bs, 2H, H5′), 5.21 (poorly resolved t, 1H, OH), 5.41 (dd, 1H, J = 70.8 and 6.0 Hz, H3′), 7.42 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.89 (bs, 1H, H1′), 8.20 (s, 1H, H2), 8.72 (s, 1H, H8). 13C NMR 27.3 (d, J = 14.1 Hz, C4′), 58.2 (C5′), 69.1 (d, J = 229.1 Hz, C3′), 111.7, 116.5 (C1′, C2′), 119.2 (C5), 138.5 (C8), 149.1 (C4), 154.0 (C2), 156.8 (C6). 19F NMR − 215.47 (d, J = 70.0 Hz). EI-MS 235 (M, 28.0), 218 (M - OH, 77.9), 205 (M - CH2O, 24.9), 135 (adenine, 91.7), 136 (adenine + H, 100.0). EI-HRMS calcd for C10H10FN5O 235.0869, found 235.0865. Anal. C10H10FN5Ox0.1 H2O (C, H, N).
Z-Isomer 10a
Mp 230–232 °C. UV λmax 237 nm (ε 25,200), 280 (ε 8,000). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 2.35 – 2.38 (bm, 1H, H4′), 3.51 (m, 1H), 3.69 (poorly resolved td, 1H, H5′), 5.03 (t, 1H, J = 5.2 Hz, OH), 5.61 (dd, 1H, J = 69.0 and 6.6 Hz, H3′), 7.45 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.55 (s, 1H, H1′), 8.20 (s, 1H, H2), 8.35 (s, 1H, H8). 13C NMR 26.3 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, C4′), 58.1 (C5′), 70.0 (d, J = 229.9 Hz, C3′), 112.1, 114.9 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, C1′, C2′), 119.1 (C5′), 138.0 (C8), 148.9 (C4), 154.2 (C2), 156.8 (C6).19F NMR −215.45 (d, J = 70.0 Hz). EI-MS 235 (M, 8.4), 218 (M - OH, 100.0), 135 (adenine, 22.9), 136 (adenine + H, 48.0). EI-HRMS calcd for C10H10FN5O 235.0869, found: 235.0870. Anal. C10H10FN5Ox0.1 H2O (C, H, N).
(E)-2-Amino-6-chloro-9-{[cis-(3-fluoro-2-hydroxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl}purine (9e) and (Z)-2-Amino-6-chloro-9-{[cis-(3-fluoro-2-hydroxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]-methyl}purine (10e)
A mixture of 2-amino-6-chloropurine (170 mg, 1.0 mmol), compound 23 (352 mg, 1.0 mmol) and K2CO3 (0.83 g, 6.0 mmol) in DMF (5 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 48 h and then at 100 – 105 °C for 45 min under N2. The reaction mixture was worked up as described for the isomeric mixture 25a + 26a but the elimination procedure was not repeated. The crude product was chromatographed in EtOAc - hexanes (1:1) to give the (Z,E)- isomeric mixture 25e + 26e (200 mg, 56%). Boron trichloride (1M in CH2Cl2, 4.44 mL, 4.44 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of compound 25e + 26e (200 mg, 0.56 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (40 mL) at −78 °C under N2 over 10 min with stirring which was continued for 5 h. The reaction was quenched with methanol (20 mL) and NaHCO3 (4 g, 47.6 mmol). After 20 min, the mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and the stirring was continued for 4 h. The insoluble solid was filtered off using a silica gel pad (3.5g), which washed with CH2Cl2 - MeOH (2:1, 60 mL). The solvents were evaporated and the residue was chromatographed in hexanes -EtOAc = 1.5:1 to 1:1 to give the faster moving E-isomer 9e (70 mg, 46.5%) followed by Z-isomer 10e (70 mg, 46.5%).
E-Isomer 9e
Mp 209–211 °C. UV λmax 239 nm (ε 26,300), 310 (ε 7,400). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 2.44–2.48 (1H, H4′, overlapped with DMSO-d5), 3.66 (t, 2H, J = 6.0 Hz, H5′), 5.15 (t, 1H, J = 5.4 Hz, OH), 5.41 (dd, 1H, J = 70.4, 6.4 Hz, H3′), 7.10 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.71 (s, 1H, H1′), 8.66 (s, 1H, H8). 13C NMR 27.6 (d, J = 13.5 Hz, C4′), 58.2 (C5′), 69.1 (d, J = 229.1 Hz, C3′), 112.5, 116.0 (2d, J = 2 Hz, C1′, C2′), 123.8 (C5), 140.5 (C8), 150.5 (C4), 153.4 (C2), 160.9 (C6). 19F NMR −215.58 (d, J = 71.9 Hz). EI-MS 269, 271 (M, 17.6, 6.1), 252, 254 (M - OH, 16.2, 5.6), 169, 171 (2-amino-6-chloropurine, 37.9, 21.4), 170, 172 (2-amino-6-chloropurine + H, 100.0, 31.5). EI-HRMS calcd for C10H935ClFN5O 269.0480, found: 269.0476.
Z-Isomer 10e
Mp 193–195 °C. UV λmax 239 nm (ε 27,200), 310 (ε 7,200). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 2.35 (1H, poorly resolved dd, H4′), 3.51 (dt, 1H, J = 11.6, 7.4 Hz, H5′) and 3.66 (dt, 1H, J = 11.2, 5.6 Hz, H5′), 5.0 (t, 1H, J = 5.8 Hz, OH), 5.62 (dd, 1H, J = 69.0, 6.6 Hz, H3′), 7.12 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.37 (s, 1H, H1′), 8.31 (s, 1H, H8). 13C NMR 26.4 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, C4′), 58.0 (C5′), 70.0 (d, J = 229.8 Hz, C3′), 113.0, 114.5 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, C1′, C2′), 123.8 (C5), 140.2 (C8), 150.6 (C4), 153.2 (C2), 161.0 (C6). 19F NMR −216.25 (d, J = 68.9 Hz). EI-MS 269, 271 (M, 14.9, 5.2), 252, 254 (M - OH, 14.9, 4.7), 169, 171 (2-amino-6-chloropurine, 39.0, 21.1), 170, 172 (2-amino-6-chloropurine + H, 100.0, 32.4). EI-HRMS calcd for C10H935ClFN5O 269.0480, found: 269.0484.
(E)-9-{[cis-(3-fluoro-2-hydroxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl}guanine (9b)
A solution of the E-isomer 9e (90 mg, 0.33 mmol) in 80% HCO2H (80%, 10 mL) was heated at 80 °C with stirring for 4 h. After cooling, formic acid and water were evaporated in vacuo, the crude product was dissolved in methanol (30 mL), NH3 (20% in methanol, 10 mL) was added at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 4 h at 0 °C. The solvents were removed to give the E-isomer 9b (80 mg, 95%), mp >300 °C. UV λmax 242 λnm (ε 26,300), 273 (ε 10,200). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 2.39 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.65 (d, 2H, J = 5.6 Hz, H5′), 5.16 (s, 1H, OH), 5.36 (dd, 1H, J = 71.2, 6.2 Hz, H3′), 6.62 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.58 (s, 1H, H1′), 8.29 (s, 1H, H8), 10.69 (bs, 1H, NH). 13C NMR 27.1 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, C4′), 58.1 (C5′), 69.0 (d, J = 229.0 Hz, C3′), 111.3 (d, J = 3.0 Hz), 116.2 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, C1′, C2′), 117.0 (C5), 134.8 (C8), 150.8 (C4), 154.8 (C2), 157.3 (C6). 19F NMR −215.43 (d, J = 71.9 Hz). ESI-MS (MeOH) 252 (M + H, 100.0). Anal. C10H10FN5O2 (C, H, N).
(Z)-9-{[cis-3-fluoro-2-(hydroxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl}guanine (10b)
The procedure described above for 9b was performed with the Z-isomer 10e (90 mg, 0.33 mmol) to give compound 10b (80 mg, 95%), mp >300 °C. UV λmax (EtOH) 242 nm (ε 27,900), 274 (ε 10,800). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 2.31 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.49 (dd, 1H, J = 10.8, 8.8 Hz), 3.65 (dd, 1H, J =10.4, 5.6 Hz, H5′), 4.99 (bs, 1H, OH), 5.58 (dd, 1H, J = 68.8, 5.6 Hz, H3′), 6.67 (s, 2H, NH2),7.26 (s, 1H, H1′), 7.91 (s, 1H, H8), 10.88 (bs, 1H, NH). 13C NMR 26.2 (d, J = 15.2 Hz, C4′), 58.0 (C5′), 69.0 (d, J = 231.7 Hz, C3′), 111.8, 114.8 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, C1′, C2′), 117.1 (C5), 134.3 (C8), 150.6 (C4), 155.0 (C2), 157.3 (C6). 19F NMR −216.82 (d, J = 68.5 Hz). ESI-MS (MeOH - KOAc) 252 (M + H, 90.0), 290 (M + K, 100.0), 503 (2M + H, 33.0), 541 (2M + K, 50.0). Anal. C10H10FN5O2 (C, H, N).
Ethyl t-3-Fluoro-t-2-hydroxymethylcyclopropane-r-1-carboxylate (27)
Boron trichloride (1.0 M in CH2Cl2, 40 mL, 40 mmol) was added dropwise with stirring to ester 15 (5.0 g, 19.8 mmol) in CH2Cl2 at −78 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1.5 h at −78 °C, 15 min at 0 °C, it was then re-cooled to −78 °C and NaHCO3 (6.72 g, 80 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and it was stirred for 4 h. Water (200 mL) was added and the mixture was extracted with CH2Cl2 (5 × 50 mL), The organic phase dried over MgSO4, solvent was evaporated and the crude product was chromatographed on a silica gel column in hexanes: Et2O = 10:1 to 3:1 to give ester 27 (2.66 g, 83%) as a colorless oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.22 (t, 3H, J = 7.4 Hz, CH3), 1.85 (dd, 1H, J = 14.0, 7.6 Hz, H2), 1.94 (ddd, 1H, J = 18.4, 6.4, 1.6 Hz, H1), 2.79 (bs, 1H, OH), 3.84, 3.69 (JAB = 11.8 Hz), 3.83, 3.71 (JAB = 11.4 Hz, 2 overlapped AB’s, 2H, CH2OH), 4.08 (dq, 2H, J = 7.6, 2.4 Hz, CH2 of Et), 4.88 (ddd, 1H, J = 64.0, 6.4, 1.6 Hz, H3). 13C NMR 14.3 (CH3 of Et), 24.9 (d, J =12.7 Hz, C1), 28.6 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, C1, C2), 58.6 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, CH2OH), 61.4 (CH2 of Et), 76.4 (d, J = 229.8 Hz, C3), 171.0 (C=O). 19F NMR −221.34 (ddd, J = 64.4, 18.3, 7.7 Hz). EI-MS 163 (M + H, 0.4), 145 (M -OH, 1.2), 131 (M - CH2OH, 44.5), 73 (100.0). EI-HRMS calcd for C7H10FO2 (M - OH) 145.0665, found 145.0665. Anal. C7H10FO2 (C, H).
Ethyl t-2-Fluoro-t-3-(2-nitrophenylselenenyl)cyclopropane-r-1-carboxylate (28)
Tributylphosphine (2.49 g, 14.8 mmol) was added to a mixture of ester 27 (2.0 g, 12.33 mmol) and 2-nitrophenyl selenocyanate17 (3.36 g, 14.8 mmol) in THF (40 mL) at room temperature with stirring which was continued for 2 h. The solvent was evaporated and the crude product was chromatographed on a silica gel column using hexanes: Et2O (10:1 to 5:1) to give product 28 (3.93 g, 92%) as a yellow oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.25 (t, 3H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH3), 1.91 (dd, 1H, J = 13.8, 6.6 Hz, H2), 1.98 (ddd, 1H, J = 18.2, 5.6, 2.4 Hz, H1), 3.06, 3.11 (JAB = 12.2 Hz), 3.08, 3.14 (JAB = 12.0 Hz, 2 overlapped AB, 2H, CH2Se), 4.12 (2 overlapped q, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, CH2 of Et), 4.94 (ddd, 1H, J = 64.4, 6.4, 1.6 Hz, H3), 7.33 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.0, 5.6, 2.4 Hz), 7.52 (bs, 1H), 7.54 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz), 8.27 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, 2-NO2Ph). 13C NMR 14.4 (CH3), 21.4 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH2Se), 25.3 (d, J = 8.2 Hz), 28.0 (d, J = 11.8 Hz), 61.5 (CH2 of Et), 76.8 (d, J = 231.3 Hz, C3), 126.0, 126.8, 129.2, 133.0, 134.1 (2-NO2Ph), 170.3 (C=O). 19F NMR −220.22 (ddd, J = 64.0, 18.1, 6.0 Hz). EI-MS 347 (M + H, 5.4), 346 (M, 1.4), 125 (100.0). EI-HRMS calcd for C13H14FNO480Se 347.0072, found: 347.0066.
t-3-Fluoro-t-2-(2-nitrophenylselenenylmethyl)cyclopropane-r-1-methanol (29)
DIBALH in hexane (1M, 21.67 mL, 21.67 mmol) was added to a solution of ester 28 (3.0 g, 8.67 mmol) in hexane (30 mL) at 0 °C during 10 min under N2. The stirring was continued for 1 h. The reaction was quenched by a dropwise addition of HCl (5%, 50 mL) and then it was extracted with Et2O (4 × 30 mL). The combined organic phase was washed successively with saturated NaHCO3 (2 × 30 mL) and water (2 × 30 mL). The solvent was evaporated and the crude product was chromatographed on a silica gel column using hexane: EtOAc (10:1 to 5:1) to give product 29 as a colorless oil (2.49 g, 95%). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.27 (ddd, 1H, J = 13.6, 6.8, 1.6 Hz, H2), 1.44 (ddd, 1H, J = 21.2, 12.8, 6.4 Hz, H1), 1.68 (bs, 1H, OH), 3.08, 3.12 (JAB = 11.6 Hz), 3.06, 3.14 (JAB = 12.0 Hz, 2 overlapped AB, 2H, CH2Se), 3.51–3.60 (m, 2H, CH2O), 4.65 (ddd, 1H, J = 64.0, 6.4, 2.4 Hz, H3), 7.32 (ddd, 1H, J = 8.0, 5.6, 2.4 Hz), 7.54 (dd, 2H, J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz), 8.29 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, 2-NO2Ph). 13C NMR 19.8 (d, J = 10.4 Hz, C1), 23.1 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, CH2Se), 28.3 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, C2), 61.8 (CH2O), 76.0 (d, J = 235.4 Hz, C3), 125.8, 126.7, 129.4, 134.0 (2- NO2Ph).19F NMR −223.87 (ddd, J = 64.0, 21.5, 3.0 Hz). EI-MS 303 (M+ H, 4.9), 186 (100.0). EI-HRMS calcd for C11H12FNO378Se 302.9974, found 302.9966.
r-1-Benzyloxymethoxymethyl-t-2-fluoro-t-3-(2-nitrophenylselenenylmethyl)cyclopropane (30)
Sodium hydride (50%, 0.63 g, 13.1 mmol) was added to a solution of compound 29 (2.0 g, 6.6 mmol) in THF (30 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h and then 1 h at room temperature. Benzyl bromide (2.57 g, 15 mmol) was added at 0 °C, the reaction mixture was slowly warmed to room temperature and it was stirred for 16 h. The solvent was evaporated and the crude product was chromatographed on a silica gel column in hexane: Et2O (30:1 to 5:1) to give compound 30 (1.84 g, 71%) as an oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.26 (m, 1H, H2), 1.46 (ddd, 1H, J = 20.9, 6.5, 2.5 Hz, H1), 3.10 (d, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2Se), 3.41 (poorly resolved dd, 1H, J = 6.8, 2.0 Hz, CH2O), 4.51, 4.48 (AB, 2H, JAB = 11.8 Hz, CH2Ph), 4.63 (ddd, 1H, J = 64.0, 6.4, 2.4 Hz, H3), 7.28–7.36 (m, 6H), 7.48–7.56 (m, 2H), 8.30 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0, 1.6 Hz, Ph + 2-NO2Ph). 13C NMR 20.0 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, C1), 23.1 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, CH2Se), 25.9 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, C2), 68.6 (CH2O), 72.9 (CH2Ph), 76.3 (d partly overlapped with CDCl3, J = 240.0 Hz, C3), 125.7, 126.7, 127.8, 128.0, 128.7, 129.4, 133.9 (Ph + 2-NO2Ph). 19F NMR −223.69 (ddd, J = 65.0, 21.1, 4.5 Hz). EI-MS 395 (M, 0.29), 91 (100.0). EI-HRMS calcd for C18H18FNO380Se 395.0436, found 395.0434.
trans-3-Benzyloxymethyl-2-fluoromethylenecyclopropane (31)
Hydrogen peroxide (30%, 1.6 mL, 15.66 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of compound 30 (1.8 g, 4.58 mmol) in THF (20 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h and then 12 h at room temperature whereupon it was partitioned between water (50 mL) and Et2O (100 mL). The organic phase was washed with water (2 × 50 mL), Na2S2O3 (5%, 2 × 20 mL), NaHCO3 (5%, 2 × 50 mL), it was dried over MgSO4 and the solvent was evaporated. A solution of the crude product in toluene (25 mL) was heated at 80–85 °C for 6 h. The solvent was evaporated and the residue was chromatographed on a silica gel column in hexanes: Et2O (50:1) to give compound 31 (640 mg, 73%) as an oil. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.20–2.22 (m, 1H, H2), 3.35–3.39 (poorly resolved dd, 1H), 3.37 (poorly resolved dd, 1H), 3.49 (m, 1H, CH2O), 4.55 (s, 2H, PhCH2), 4.76 (d, 1H, J =67.2 Hz, H3), 5.70, 5.92 (2s, 2H, CH2=), 7.30–7.36 (m, 5H, Ph). 13C NMR 25.0 (d, J = 13.0 Hz, C2), 68.7 (CH2O), 70.6 (d, J = 230.3 Hz, C3), 72.8 (PhCH2), 111.4 (CH2=), 127.9, 128.0, 128.7, 131.8, 138.2 (C1 + Ph). 19F NMR −203.67 (dd, J = 67.4, 13.9 Hz). ESI-MS 215 (M + Na, 42.3), 91 (PhCH2, 100.0).
r-2-Benzyloxymethyl-c,t-1-bromo-c,t-1-bromomethyl-t-fluorocyclopropane (32)
Pyridinium tribromide (2.0 g, 6.27 mmol) was added to a solution of compound 31 (600 mg, 3.13 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (15 mL) at −20 °C with stirring. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and the stirring was continued for 10 h. After removal of the solvent, the crude mixture was chromatographed on a silica gel column in hexanes: Et2O (50:1 to 20:1) to give product 32 (910 mg, 83%).1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 1.73, 2.21 (2m, 1H, H1), 3.58–3.72 (m, 2H, CH2Br), 3.76–3.97 (m, 2H, CH2O), 4.45 (dd, J = 63.8, 4.1 Hz), 4.82 (dd, J = 63.0, 3.6 Hz, 1H, H3), 4.51, 4.52, 4.59 (3s, 2H, CH2Ph), 7.33–7.40 (m, 5H, Ph). 13C NMR 33.2, 35.8 (2d, J = 11.1, 10.0 Hz, C2), 38.0–38.1 (2 overlapped d, CH2Br), 38.5, 40.3 (2d, J = 10.1 Hz, C1), 64.37, 68.90, 73.2, 73.5 (CH2O), 76.1, 81.3 (2d, J = 241.7, 243.7 Hz, C3), 77.0, 77.4, 77.8 (CH2Ph), 128.1, 128.14, 128.3, 128.8, 128.85, 137.5, 138.0 (Ph). 19F NMR −201.56 (dd, J = 64.0, 20.0 Hz), −207.76 (dd, J = 62.9, 22.8 Hz). ESI-MS 373, 375, 377 (M + Na, 49.0, 100.0, 48.0).
c,t-9-{[c,t-1-Bromo-t-3-fluoro-r-2-(benzyloxymethyl)cyclopropyl]methyl}adenine (33a)
A mixture of K2CO3 (280 mg, 2.22 mmol), adenine (50 mg, 0.37 mmol) and compound 32 (120 mg, 0.34 mmol) was stirred in DMF (2.0 mL) at rt for 8 h and at at 40 °C for 2 h under N2. The insoluble solid was filtered off and DMF was evaporated in vacuo. The residue was chromatographed on a silica gel column using EtOAc - MeOH (100:0 to 20:1) to give compound 33a (0.12 g, 86%), mp. 112–115 °C. UV λmax 261 nm (ε 11, 700), 203 (ε 23,400). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.19–2.33 (1H, m, H4′), 3.46–3.51, 3.57–3.67 (2m, 2H, H5′), 4.43–5.00 (overlapped m, 5H, CH2Ph, H1′, H3′), 5.84 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.21–7.34 (m, 5H, Ph), 8.03, 8.06, 8.33 and 8.37 (4s, 1H, H2, H8). 19F NMR −203.35 (ddd, J = 64.0, 19.6, 4.5 Hz), −206.81 (dd, J = 62.5, 23.0 Hz). ESI-MS 406, 408 (M + H, 94.0, 100.0), 428, 430 (M + Na, 24.3, 27.3).
(E)-{[trans-(3-Fluoro-2-benzyloxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl}adenine (34a) and (Z)-{[trans-(3-Fluoro-2-benzyloxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl}adenine (35a)
A mixture of compound 33a (0.40 g, 0.98 mmol) and K2CO3 (410 mg, 3 mmol) in DMF (5 mL) was stirred for 55 min at 100 °C. The mixture was cooled to 0 °C, the insoluble portion was filtered off using a silica gel (3.5 g) pad which was washed with DMF (10 mL). The solvent was evaporated and the residue was chromatographed on a silica gel column using hexanes: EtOAc (1:4 to 100% EtOAc) to give the E,Z-isomeric mixture 34a + 35a (50 mg, 16%) followed by starting material 33a (260 mg, 59%). The latter was subjected to another two cycles of elimination and chromatography to give 34a + 35a (105 mg, 33%). The isomeric mixture 34a + 35a (390 mg, 1.2 mmol, E/Z = 1.5:1)) combined from several experiments was chromatographed on silica gel using hexanes - EtOAc = 1:1 to 1:2 to 100% EtOAc to give the faster moving E-isomer 34a (220 mg, 56%) followed by the Z-isomer 35a (150 mg, 38%).
E-Isomer 34a
Mp 173–175 °C. UV λmax 280 nm (ε 9,500), 238 (ε 26,600). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.62 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.30 (t, 1H, J = 9.2 Hz), 3.91 (dd, 1H, J = 9.6, 5.6 Hz, H5′), 4.55 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 4.97 (d, 1H, J = 68.8 Hz, H3′), 6.08 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.26–7.33 (m, 5H, Ph), 7.99 (s, 1H, H1′), 8.38, 8.76 (2s, 2H, H2, H8). 13C NMR (CDCl3) δ 26.6 (d, J = 13.4 Hz, C4′), 68.8 (d, J = 234.3 Hz, C3′), 68.9 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, C5′), 73.6 (CH2Ph), 111.4 (d, J = 4.4 Hz), 117.0 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, C1′, C2′), 119.6 (C5), 128.0, 128.3, 128.8, 137.5 (Ph), 138.3 (C8), 149.3 (C4), 153.7 (C2), 155.8 (C6). 19F NMR −201.70 (dd, J = 68.9, 10.5 Hz). ESI-MS 326 (M + H, 100.0), 348 (M + Na, 31.6).
Z-Isomer 35a
Mp 159–162 °C. UV λmax 279 nm (ε 10,000), 237 (ε 29,400). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.58 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.49 (poorly resolved dd, 1H), 3.60 (m, 1H, H5′), 4.56 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 5.09 (d, 1H, J = 68.0 Hz, H3′), 6.11 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.29–7.34 (m, 5H, phenyl), 7.63 (s, 1H, H1′), 8.19, 8.38 (2s, 2H, H2, H8). 13C NMR 25.2 (d, J = 12.7 Hz, C4′), 68.1 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, C5′), 70.0 (d, J = 229.8 Hz, C3′), 73.2 (CH2Ph), 111.9, 116.1 (C1′, C2′), 119.6 (C5), 128.0, 128.2, 128.8, 137.8 (Ph), 138.0 (C8), 149.0 (C4), 153.9 (C2), 155.8 (C6). 19F NMR −202.17 (dd, J = 68.3, 10.0 Hz). ESI-MS 326 (M + H, 100.0), 348 M + Na, 48.2).
(E)-{[trans-(3-Fluoro-2-hydroxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl}adenine (11a)
A solution of BCl3.SMe2 complex in CH2Cl2 (2.0 M, 1.37 mL, 2.74 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of compound 34a (150 mg, 0.46 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) at room temperature with stirring which was continued for 5 h. The reaction was quenched by adding NaHCO3 (4.0 g, 47.6 mmol) and methanol (15 mL) at −78 °C and then it was stirred for 2 h at room temperature. The insoluble solid was filtered off through a silica gel (2.5 g) pad and it was washed with CH2Cl2 - MeOH (2:1, 50 mL). The filtrate was concentrated and the residue was chromatographed on a silica gel column to give product 11a (80 mg, 74%), mp 218–220 °C. UV λmax 280 nm (ε 11,000), 237 (ε 32,600). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 2.60–263 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.48, 3.67 (2m, H5′), 5.17 (t, 1H, J = 5.6 Hz, OH), 5.21 (d, 1H, J = 70.4 Hz, H3′), 7.41 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.93 (s, 1H, H1′), 8.19 (s, 1H, H2), 8.71 (s, 1H, H8). 13C NMR 29.5 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, C4′), 60.2 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, C5′), 70.0 (d, J = 229.8 Hz, C3′), 112.5 (d, J = 2.9 Hz), 116.8 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, C1′, C2′), 119.2 (C5), 138.4 (C8), 149.1 (C4), 154.0 (C2), 156.8 (C6). 19F NMR −200.81 (dd, J = 70.2, 12.2). EI-MS 235 (M, 14.9), 218 (M - OH, 100.0), 136 (Ade + H, 48.4), 135 (Ade, 36.0). EI-HRMS calcd for C10H10N5FO 235.0869, found: 235.0871. Anal. C10H10FN5O (C, H, N).
(Z)-{[trans-(3-Fluoro-2-hydroxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl}adenine (12a)
The procedure described above for the E-isomer 11a was repeated with the Z-isomer 35a to give compound 12a (85 mg, 79%), mp 239–242 °C. UV λmax 280 nm (ε 11,300), 237 (ε 31,100). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 2.42–2.45 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.37 (poorly resolved dd, 1H), 1H), 3.51–3.54 (m, 1H, H5′), 5.02 (bs, 1H, OH), 5.36 (d, 1H, J = 68.8 Hz, H3′), 7.44 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.58 (s, 1H, H1′), 8.21 (s, 1H, H2), 8.34 (s, 1H, H8). 13C NMR 27.6 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, C4′), 60.3 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, C5′), 70.8 (d, J = 229.8 Hz, C3′), 112.7 (d, J = 2.2 Hz), 115.7 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, C1′, C2′), 119.2 (C5), 138.1 (C8), 148.9 (C4), 154.0 (C2), 156.7 (C6). 19F NMR −201.15 (dd, J = 68.9, 10.9 Hz). EI-MS 235 (M, 17.1), 218 (M - OH, 100.0), 136 (adenine + H, 37.7), 135 (adenine, 28.1). EI-HRMS calcd. for C10H10 N5FO 235.0869, found: 235.0871. Anal. C10H10FN5O (C, H, N).
2-Amino-6-chloro-c,t-9-{[c,t-1-bromo-t-3-fluoro-r-2-(benzyloxymethyl)cyclopropyl]-methyl}purine (33e)
A mixture of 2-amino-6-chloropurine (580 mg, 3.43 mmol), compound 32 (1.2 g, 3.41 mmol) in DMF (20 mL) and K2CO3 (1.4 g, 10.1 mmol) was stirred for 5 h at 40 °C under N2. The insoluble solid was filtered off using a short silica gel pad which was washed with DMF (100 mL). The solvent was evaporated in vacuo at room temperature and the residue was chromatographed on a silica gel column in hexanes - EtOAc (3:1 to 2:1) to give compound 33e (1.30 g, 87%), mp 75–79 °C. UV λmax 311 nm (ε 10,700), 244 (ε 11,100), 223 (ε 34,700). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.14–2.27 (cluster of m, 1H, H4′), 3.46, 3.65 and 3.90 (3m, 2H, H5′), 4.42–4.57 (s and m), 4.69–4.91 (m, 5H, H1′, H3′, CH2Ph), 5.16, 5.24 (2s, 2H, NH2), 7.21–7.37 (2m, 5H, Ph), 7.98, 8.00 (2s, 1H, H8). 19F NMR −203.69 (dd, J = 64.0, 20.0 Hz), −206.74 (dd, J = 62.5, 24.5 Hz). ESI-MS 440, 442, 444 (M + H, 76.9, 100.0, 24.3), 462, 464, 466 (M + Na, 65.7, 87.6, 18.3).
(E)-2-Amino-6-chloro-9-{[trans-(3-fluoro-2-(benzyloxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl}-purine (34e) and (Z)-2-Amino-6-chloro-9-{[trans-(3-fluoro-2-benzyloxymethyl)-cyclopropylidene]methyl}purine (35e)
A mixture of compound 33e (700 mg, 1.59 mmol), K2CO3 (660 mg, 4.78 mmol) in DMF (8 mL) was stirred for 45 min at 100 °C. After the work-up (see 33e), the crude product was chromatographed on a silica gel column using hexanes -EtOAc (3:1 to 2:1) the E-isomer 34e (70 mg, 18%) followed by Z-isomer 35e (110 mg, 29%) and unreacted starting material 33e (230 mg, 33%).
E-Isomer 34e
Mp 93–95 °C. UV λmax 307 nm (ε 9,000), 226 (ε 25,800). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.59–2.61 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.20 (t, 1H, J = 9.0 Hz, H5′), 3.87 (dd, 1H, J =10.0, 1.6 Hz, H5), 4.55 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 4.94 (d, J = 68.8 Hz, H3′), 5.24 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.26–7.34 (m, 5H, phenyl), 7.81 (s, 1H, H1′), 8.73 (s, 1H, H8). 13C NMR 26.7 (d, J = 12.7 Hz, C4′),68.5 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, C5′), 68.8 (d, J = 235.1 Hz, C3′), 73.5 (CH2Ph), 111.7 (d, J = 3.7 Hz), 116.5 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, C1′, C2′), 125.5 (C5), 128.1, 128.3, 128.8, 137.4 (Ph), 139.9 (C8), 151.8 (C4), 152.8 (C2), 159.6 (C6). 19F NMR −201.82 (dd, J = 68.5, 12.1 Hz). ESI-MS 360, 362 (M + H, 54,2, 29.2), 382, 384 (M + Na, 100.0, 32.7), 741, 743 (2M + Na, 49.4, 35.7).
Z-Isomer 35e
Mp 99–101 °C. UV λmax 307 nm (ε 8,500), 226 (ε 24,300). 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 2.54–2.60 m, 1H, H4′), 3.50–3.60 (m, 2H, H5′), 4.56 (s, 2H, CH2Ph), 5.07 (d, J = 68.4 Hz, H3′), 5.21 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.30–7.38 (m, 5H, phenyl), 7.45 (s, 1H, H1′), 8.12 (s, 1H, H8). 13C NMR 25.2 (d, J = 12.7 Hz, C4′), 68.1 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, C5′), 69.9 (d, J = 235.7 Hz, C3′), 73.2 (CH2Ph), 112.2 (d, J = 2.2 Hz), 115.6 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, C1′, C2′), 125.5 (C5), 128.0, 128.2, 128.8, 137.8 (Ph), 139.5 (C8), 152.0 (C4), 152.5 (C2), 159.7 (C6). 19F NMR −202.05 (dd, J = 65.5, 12.2 Hz). ESI-MS 360, 362 (M + H, 54.2, 28.6), 382, 384 (M + Na, 100.0, 32.7), 741, 743 (2M + Na, 49.1, 35.7).
(E)-2-Amino-6-chloro-9-{[trans-(3-fluoro-2-hydroxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl-purine (11e)
The procedure described for adenine analogue 11a was followed with the E-isomer 34e (200 mg, 0.56 mmol) to give compound 11e (110 mg, 74%), mp 209–211 °C. UV λmax 311 nm (ε 8,300), 239 (ε 29,400). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 2.60–2.66 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.42–3.48 (m, 1H), 3.63–3.69 (m, 1H, H5′′), 5.11 (t partly overlapped with H3′, 1H, J = 5.6 Hz, OH), 5.20 (d, 1H, J = 71.2 Hz, H3′), 7.10 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.74 (s, 1H, H1′), 8.67 (s, 1H, H8). 13C NMR 29.6 (d, J = 11.9 Hz, C4′), 60.1 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, C5′), 70.0 (d, J = 229.1 Hz, C3′), 113.2 (d, J = 3.7 Hz), 116.3 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, C1′, C2′), 123.8 (C5), 140.5 (C8), 150.5 (C4), 153.4 (C2), 160.9 (C6). 19F NMR −201.13 (dd, J = 68.9, 12.4 Hz). ESI-MS 270, 272 (M + H, 100.0, 31.0), 292, 294 (M + Na, 50.0, 15.2).
(Z)-2-Amino-6-chloro-9-{[trans-(3-fluoro-2-hydroxymethylcyclopropylidene]methyl}purine (12e)
The procedure described for compound 11a was performed with the Z-isomer 35e (360 mg, 1.0 mmol) to give 12e (200 mg, 74%), mp 201–203 °C. UV λmax 311 nm (ε 7,900), 239 (ε 28,700). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 2.40–2.46 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.34–3.40 (overlapped with water), 3.47–3.53 (m, 1H, H5′), 5.01 (t, 1H, J = 5.8 Hz, OH), 5.36 (d, 1H, J = 67.2 Hz, H3′), 7.11 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.40 (s, 1H, H1′), 8.28 (s, 1H, H8). 13C NMR 27.7 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, C4′), 60.2 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, C5′), 70.9 (d, J = 229.8 Hz, C3′), 113.5 (d, J = 2.2 Hz), 115.3 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, C1′, C2′), 123.8 (C5), 140.1 (C8), 150.6 (C4[′), 153.1 (C2), 161.0 (C6). 19F NMR −200.70 (dd, J = 68.9, 12.4 Hz). ESI-MS 270, 272 (M + H, 100.0, 3.6), 292, 294 (M + Na, 50, 15.8).
(E)-9-{[(trans-(3-fluoro-2-hydroxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl}guanine (11b)
The procedure described for compound 9b was followed using the E-isomer 11e (120 mg, 0.45 mmol) to give guanine analogue 11b (82 mg, 73%), mp >300 °C. UV λmax 273 nm (ε 10,200), 242 (ε 26,300). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 2.48–2.53 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.61–3.65 (m overlapped with H2O, H5′), 5.16 (t overlapped with H3′, 1H, OH), 5.35 (d, 1H, J = 68.2 Hz, H3′), 6.59 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.61 (s, 1H, H1′), 8.28 (s, 1H, H8), 10.69 (bs, 1H, NH). 13C NMR 29.3 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, C4′), 60.1 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, C5), 69.9 (d, J = 229.9 Hz, C3′), 112.2 (d, J = 3.7 Hz), 116.5 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, C1′, C2′), 117.1 (C5), 134.8 (C8), 150.8 (C4), 154.8 (C2), 157.3 (C6). 19F NMR −200.84 (dd, J = 70.2, 10.7 Hz). ESI-MS (MeOH - KOAc) 252 (M + H, 100.0), 290 (M + K, 20.9), 503 (2M + H, 16.1), 541 (2M + K, 6.0). Anal. C10H10FN5O2 (C, H, N).
(Z)-9-{[(trans-(3-fluoro-2-hydroxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methyl}guanine (12b)
Procedure described for compound 9b was followed with the Z-isomer 12e (200 mg, 0.74 mmol) to give E-isomer 12b (140 mg, 75.5%), mp >300°C. UV λmax 274 nm (ε 9,900), 241 nm (ε 26,000). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6) δ 2.36–2.40 (m, 1H, H4′), 3.46–3.53 (m, 1H 4.96 (t, 1H, 5.2 Hz, OH), 5.32 (d, 1H, J = 68.0 Hz, H3′), 6.88 (s, 2H, NH2), 7.29 (s, 1H, H1′), 7.86 (s, 1H, H8), 10.74 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR 27.5 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, C4′), 60.2 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, C5′), 70.8 (d, J = 229.9 Hz, C3′), 112.3 (d, J = 1.5 Hz), 115.6 (d, J = 2.3 Hz, C1′, C2′), C5 (117.0), 134.2 (C8), 150.6 (C4), 155.2 (C2), 157.2 (C6). 19F NMR −201.23 (dd, J = 67.9, 11.5 Hz). ESI-MS (MeOH + KOAc) 252 (M + H, 100.0), 290 (M + K, 11.9), 503 (2M + H, 11.3), 541 (2M + K, 3.0). Anal. C10H10FN5O2 (C, H, N).
Antiviral Assays
The antiviral assays were performed as described previously.11 The HCMV assays were performed with Towne and AD169 strains of the virus in HFF culture by plaque reduction or cytopathic effect (CPE) inhibition assay. The HSV-1 was run in BSC-1 cells by ELISA. In addition, HSV-1 and HSV-2 assays were performed in HFF (CPE inhibition) and Vero cells (plaque reduction). The EBV assays were run in Daudi culture (viral capsid antigen, VCA-ELISA) and in H-1 culture (DNA hybridization). The VZV was assayed in HFF cells (CPE inhibition or plaque reduction), HIV-1 in MT-2 cells (CPE inhibition) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) in 2.2.15 cells. The cytotoxicity assays were performed in HFF, KB or CEM cells. The results are summarized in Table 3 and 4.
Adenosine Deaminase (ADA) Assay.11
Compounds 9a, 10a, 11a and 12a (2.0 – 2.4 μmol) were incubated with ADA (1.1 unit/mL) in 0.05 M Na2HPO4 (pH 7.5, 0.47 – 0.54 mL). Aliquots were periodically withdrawn and examined by TLC in CH2Cl2 - MeOH (9:1, multiple development, 10a, 11a) and EtOAc - MeOH (10:1, multiple development, 9a, 12a). The extent of deamination of 9a, 10a and 11a was approximately 50% after 24 and 48 h whereas 12a was not deaminated after 48 h.
Supplementary Material
Elemental Analyses. This information is available online free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
Acknowledgments
We thank L. M. Hrihorczuk from the Central Instrumentation Facility, Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University (D. M. Coleman, Director) for mass spectra. We also thank research assistants and associates in Drs. Drach and Kern laboratories for expert performance of antiviral and cytotoxicity assays. The work described herein was supported by U. S. Public Health Service grants RO1-CA32779 (J.Z.), RO1-CA44358 (Y.-C.C.) from the National Cancer Institute, contracts NO1-AI85347, NO1-AI30049 (E.R.K.) and program project PO1-AI46390 (J.C.D.) from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
References
- 1.Preliminary report: Zemlicka J, Zhou S, Kern ER, Drach JC, Mitsuya H. Synthesis and Antiviral Activity of Methylene-3-fluorocyclopropane Analogues. Antiviral Res; 19th International Conference on Antiviral Research; San Juan, Puerto Rico. May 7–11; 2006. p. A68.
- 2.Zemlicka J. Unusual Analogues of Nucleosides: Chemistry and Biological Activity. In: Chu CK, editor. Recent Advances in Nucleosides: Chemistry and Chemotherapy. Elsevier Science; Amsterdam: 2002. pp. 327–357. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zemlicka J, Chen X. Methylenecyclopropane Analogs of Nucleosides as Antiviral Agents. In: Schinazi RF, Liotta DC, editors. Frontiers in Nucleosides and Nucleic Acids. IHL Press; Tucker, Georgia: 2004. pp. 267–307. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zhou S, Breitenbach JM, Borysko KZ, Drach JC, Kern ER, Gullen E, Cheng YC, Zemlicka J. Synthesis and Antiviral Activity of (Z)- and (E)-2,2-[Bis(hydroxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methylpurines and -pyrimidines: Second-Generation Methylenecyclopropane Analogues of Nucleosides. J Med Chem. 2004;47:566–575. doi: 10.1021/jm030316s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yan Z, Kern ER, Gullen E, Cheng YC, Drach JC, Zemlicka J. Nucleotides and Pronucleotides of 2,2-Bis(hydroxymethyl)cyclopropane Analogues of Purine Nucleosides: Synthesis and Antiviral Activity. J Med Chem. 2005;48:91–99. doi: 10.1021/jm040149b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kern ER, Kushner NL, Hartline CB, Williams-Azziz SL, Harden EA, Zhou S, Zemlicka J, Prichard MN. In Vitro Activity and Mechanism of Action of Methylenecyclopropane Analogs of Nucleosides against Herpesvirus Replication. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:1039–1045. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.3.1039-1045.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kern ER, Bidanset DJ, Hartline CB, Yan Z, Zemlicka J, Quenelle DC. Oral Activity of a Methylenecyclopropane Analog, Cyclopropavir, in Animal Models for Cytomegalovirus Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:4745–4753. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4745-4753.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Welch JT, Eswarakrishnan S. Fluorine in Bioorganic Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons; New York: 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pankiewicz KW. Fluorinated Nucleosides. Carbohyd Res. 2000;327:87–105. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6215(00)00089-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang R, Ksebati MB, Corbett TH, Kern ER, Drach JC, Zemlicka J. Methylene-gem-difluorocyclopropane Analogues of Nucleosides: Synthesis, Cyclopropene-Methylenecyclopropane Rearrangement, and Biological Activity. J Med Chem. 2001;44:4019–4022. doi: 10.1021/jm010191w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhou S, Kern ER, Gullen E, Cheng YC, Drach JC, Matsumi S, Mitsuya H, Zemlicka J. (Z)- and (E)-[2-Fluoro-2-(hydroxymethyl)cyclopropylidene]methylpurines and -pyrimidines , a New Class of Methylenecyclopropane Analogues of Nucleosides: Synthesis and Antiviral Activity. J Med Chem. 2004;47:6964–6972. doi: 10.1021/jm040093l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cox DG, Gurusamy N, Burton DJ. Surprising Stereochemical Control of Wittig Olefination Involving Reaction of Fluorine-Containing Phosphoranium Salt and Aldehydes. J Am Chem Soc. 1985;107:2811–2812. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Meyer OGJ, Frohlich R, Haufe G. Asymmetric Cyclopropanation of Vinyl Fluorides: Access to Enantiopure Monofluorinated Cyclopropane Carboxylates. Synthesis. 2000:1479–1490. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wiley GA, Hershkowitz RL, Rein BM, Chung BC. Studies in Organophosphorus Chemistry. I. Conversion of Alcohols and Phenols to Halides by Tertiary Phosphine Dihalides. J Am Chem Soc. 1964;86:964–965. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhou S, Zemlicka J. A New Alkylation-Elimination Method for Synthesis of Antiviral Fluoromethylenecyclopropane Analogues of Nucleosides. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:7112–7116. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2005.05.054. and references 20 and 21 cited therein. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang R, Harada S, Mitsuya H, Zemlicka J. Inhibition of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Reverse Transcriptase by Synadenol Triphosphate and Its E-Isomer. J Med Chem. 2003;46:4799–4802. doi: 10.1021/jm030048y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Taber DF, Walter R, Meagley RP. Intramolecular C-H Insertion by an Alkylidene Carbene: Diastereoselective Synthesis of a Taxol A Ring Synthon. J Org Chem. 1994;59:6014–6017. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sharpless BK, Young MW. Olefin Synthesis. Rate Enhancement of the Elimination of Alkyl Aryl Selenoxides by Electron-Withdrawing Substituents. J Org Chem. 1975;40:947–949. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Smith MB, March J. March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry. 5. John Wiley & Sons; New York: 2001. pp. 160–161. [Google Scholar]
- 20.An expanded 19F NMR indicated the presence of 5% of opposite stereoisomer.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Elemental Analyses. This information is available online free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.



