Abstract
Marlboro is 50 years old—and still killing its customers
Keywords: Marlboro, market share, mortality
On 5 November 2005, Philip Morris celebrated the 50th anniversary of its Marlboro brand with invitation only parties held in 49 US cities featuring popular entertainers. Fifty years ago, Philip Morris repositioned Marlboro from a feminine brand to one featuring a series of masculine models, eventually settling on the now iconic cowboy (see the cover for examples of Marlboro advertising, which can also be found at http:\\roswell.tobaccodocuments.org).
Today, Marlboro holds over 40% of the US cigarette market share and has become one of the leading consumer products sold worldwide, generating massive profits for Philip Morris.1 Unfortunately, there is a downside—Marlboro kills its customers.2 Because Philip Morris thought it important to bring attention to the 50th anniversary of the modern Marlboro brand, we thought it was only fitting to try to estimate the number of US Marlboro customers that have died and are projected to die as a result of visiting “Flavor Country”.
NUMBER OF DEATHS
In order to calculate the fraction of deaths attributable to Marlboro cigarettes in the United States over the past 50 years (table 1), we first determined the number of smoking attributable deaths in a given year and then multiplied this by the estimated market share for Marlboro cigarettes in the 10 years before, reflecting a 10 year latent period between smoking and disease. The number of tobacco deaths was derived from published estimates for 1985, 1988, 1990–1994, and 1995–1999.2,3 If data were not available for a given year estimates were interpolated between data points. The cumulative US tobacco‐attributable mortality data from 1964 to 1985 (5.7 million attributable deaths) were available4 and annual estimates were interpolated to reflect a linear increase during that period, with the conditions that the cumulative total equals 5.7 million and the 1985 data point equals the published total of 390 000. Mortality estimates for the period between 1955 to 1963 assume the same linear constant change. Marlboro's share of the cigarette market in a given year between 1955 and 2005 was based on reports compiled from industry documents and financial reports.5 Future US deaths from Marlboro cigarettes are based on recent estimates of smoking attributable deaths and Marlboro market share. The total number of tobacco‐attributable deaths to Marlboro smokers is the sum of the annual number of deaths. Future expected Marlboro‐attributable deaths are estimated by multiplying the constant tobacco‐attributable mortality in a given year between 2006 and 2015 by the Marlboro market share 10 years previous and summing across years.
Table 1 Marlboro market share and estimated number of Marlboro smokers dying from smoking attributable diseases in the United States, 1955–2015.
| Year | Estimated number of Marlboro attributable deaths assuming a 10 year lag period | Estimated future Marlboro attributable deaths | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marlboro market share | Total smoking attributable mortality | Mortality attributed to Marlboro | Year | Marlboro market share | Total smoking attributable mortality | Mortality attributed to Marlboro | Year | Marlboro market share | Total smoking attributable mortality | Mortality attributed to Marlboro | |
| 1955 | 1.7% | 109066 | 1981 | 18.3% | 329983 | 36668 | 2006 | 40.5% | 442398 | 143197 | |
| 1956 | 3.7% | 113810 | 1982 | 19.2% | 344337 | 43722 | 2007 | 40.5% | 442398 | 151862 | |
| 1957 | 4.8% | 118761 | 1983 | 20.1% | 359316 | 49634 | 2008 | 40.5% | 442398 | 157926 | |
| 1958 | 4.7% | 123927 | 1984 | 21.5% | 374946 | 55343 | 2009 | 40.5% | 442398 | 165075 | |
| 1959 | 4.5% | 129318 | 1985 | 22.4% | 390000 | 60242 | 2010 | 40.5% | 442398 | 161475 | |
| 1960 | 4.6% | 134943 | 1986 | 23.0% | 404667 | 63655 | 2011 | 40.5% | 442398 | 165899 | |
| 1961 | 4.9% | 140813 | 1987 | 23.6% | 419333 | 67287 | 2012 | 40.5% | 442398 | 165899 | |
| 1962 | 5.1% | 146938 | 1988 | 24.7% | 434000 | 72461 | 2013 | 40.5% | 442398 | 170323 | |
| 1963 | 5.0% | 153330 | 1989 | 25.7% | 432350 | 73353 | 2014 | 40.5% | 442398 | 174747 | |
| 1964 | 5.0% | 160000 | 1990 | 25.9% | 430700 | 76293 | 2015 | 40.5% | 442398 | 179171 | |
| 1965 | 5.3% | 166960 | 2856 | 1991 | 25.8% | 430700 | 78750 | TOTAL | 1635576 | ||
| 1966 | 6.0% | 174223 | 6372 | 1992 | 24.4% | 430700 | 82577 | ||||
| 1967 | 6.6% | 181801 | 8668 | 1993 | 23.5% | 430700 | 86777 | ||||
| 1968 | 7.4% | 189710 | 9009 | 1994 | 28.1% | 430700 | 92572 | ||||
| 1969 | 8.5% | 197962 | 8862 | 1995 | 30.1% | 442398 | 99089 | ||||
| 1970 | 9.8% | 206574 | 9558 | 1996 | 32.4% | 442398 | 101855 | ||||
| 1971 | 11.1% | 215559 | 10599 | 1997 | 34.3% | 442398 | 104377 | ||||
| 1972 | 12.7% | 224936 | 11367 | 1998 | 35.7% | 442398 | 109423 | ||||
| 1973 | 13.8% | 234721 | 11741 | 1999 | 37.3% | 442398 | 113559 | ||||
| 1974 | 14.8% | 244931 | 12143 | 2000 | 36.5% | 442398 | 114420 | ||||
| 1975 | 15.4% | 255586 | 13455 | 2001 | 37.5% | 442398 | 114004 | ||||
| 1976 | 15.7% | 266704 | 16123 | 2002 | 37.5% | 442398 | 108088 | ||||
| 1977 | 16.0% | 278306 | 18256 | 2003 | 38.5% | 442398 | 104052 | ||||
| 1978 | 16.7% | 290412 | 21571 | 2004 | 39.5% | 442398 | 124463 | ||||
| 1979 | 17.0% | 303045 | 25746 | 2005 | 40.5% | 442398 | 133213 | ||||
| 1980 | 17.7% | 316227 | 30972 | TOTAL | 2383178 | ||||||
Marlboro market share from 1955 to 1999 is obtained from various industry documents compiled by Goldstein (see Goldstein5).
Marlboro market share from 2000 to 2005 is estimated from the October 2005 IRI report (see Prudential Equity Group1).
Tobacco attributable mortality data come from published estimates for 1985, 1989, 1990–1994, and 1995–1999 (see 3). Data from 2000–2005 are assumed to equal the 1995–1999 period. Years in this period without a direct estimate were interpolated between data points. Cumulative smoking‐attributable mortality data from 1964 to 1985 were available (see Warner and Murt4) and annual estimates were interpolated to reflect a linear increase during that period with the conditions that the cumulative total equals the published total of 5.7 million and the 1985 data point equals the published total of 390000. Mortality estimates from 1955 to 1963 assumed the same linear constant change.
Marlboro attributable deaths assume a 10 year lag period. Future Marlboro attributable deaths assume the Marlboro market share and total smoking attributable deaths remain at the 2005 levels for the next 10 years.
MARKET SHARE
The market share for Marlboro steadily increased to over 10% by 1971, to over 20% by 1983, to over 30% by 1995, and to over 40% by 2005. Marlboro cigarettes have killed more than 2.3 million Americans since 1955 with another expected 1.6 million deaths in the next 10 years. Put another way, in 2005, Marlboro is estimated to account for 30% of all smoking‐attributable deaths in the United States.
It is important to recognise that the estimates presented in this paper are subject to limitations including the length of the lag period used, the amount smoked by Marlboro smokers compared to other smokers, and brand switching to and from Marlboro products; however, there is no getting around the overall conclusion that Marlboro is by far and away the most lethal consumer product ever produced. More Americans have died or will die because of Marlboro than US soldiers who have died in all foreign wars combined.6 However, merely considering the number of deaths attributable to Marlboro in the United States over the past half century is surely a huge underestimate of the total death toll from Marlboro, given the brands position as the world's best selling cigarette. According to a recent Philip Morris International report, Marlboro is considered the greatest asset of the company with projected strong growth predicted for the future worldwide.7 With the death toll from tobacco estimated to reach 10 million annually by 2020, it is likely that Marlboro's next 50 years could prove to be its most deadly.8
Birthdays are a time to reflect on the good and bad that has taken place in the past and what the future might hold. Perhaps instead of sponsoring a birthday bash commemorating 50 years of the Marlboro man, Philip Morris should hold a funeral and send the Marlboro man to his grave like so many of his loyal customers.
References
- 1.Prudential Equity Group, LLC IRI monthly report – September tobacco data. 27 October 2005
 - 2.Fellows J L, Trosclair A, Adams E K.et al Annual smoking‐attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and economic costs — United States, 1995–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Surveillance Summary 200251300–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 3.US Department of Health and Human Services The health consequences of smoking: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Georgia: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2004
 - 4.Warner K E, Murt H A. Premature deaths avoided by the antismoking campaign. Am J Public Health 198373672–677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 - 5.Goldstein R.Cigarette production 1949–1999. Report produced for Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo New York, 2003. http://roswell.tobaccodocuments.org
 - 6.Anon Statistical Summary America's Major Wars. http://www.cwc.lsu.edu/cwc/other/stats/warcost.htm
 - 7. Remarks by A Calantzopoulos, President and CEO, at JP Morgan conference, London June 29 2005. http://www.altria.com/media/press_release/03_02_pr_2005_06_29_02.asp
 - 8.Ezzati M, Lopez A D. Estimates of global mortality attributable to smoking in 2000. Lancet 2003362847–852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 
