Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
letter
. 2008 Aug 27;46(10):3546–3547. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01027-08

Evaluation of Three Commercial Latex Agglutination Tests for Identification of Campylobacter spp.

Robert S Miller 1, Leslie Speegle 1, Omar A Oyarzabal 1,*, Albert J Lastovica 1
PMCID: PMC2566095  PMID: 18753358

Latex agglutination tests for the rapid identification of Campylobacter spp. have been available in the market for more than 20 years (1, 3). As of November 2007, there were only three commercial latex agglutination tests: PanBio-Campy (jcl) (PanBio Inc., Columbia, MD), the Dryspot Campylobacter (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England), and the Microgen M46 Campylobacter (Microgen Bioproducts Ltd., Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom). The only test approved by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States is PanBio-Campy (jcl), which was approved under the name Meritec-Campy (jcl) by Meridian Biosciences, Inc. (Cincinnati, OH; formerly known as Meridian Diagnostics), in 1993. However, as of August 2008, PanBio-Campy will be produced and marketed by Scimedx Corporation (Denville, NJ) under the name CAMPY (jcl).

These latex agglutination tests use polyclonal antibodies to detect antigenic outer membrane proteins or antigenic epitopes from flagella. We evaluated these three test kits in parallel with a variety of Campylobacter strains belonging to eight species. These strains have been isolated from clinical and food sources. We also tested these kits with strains of bacteria other than Campylobacter, mostly isolated from clinical and food sources. These strains included six Acinetobacter baumannii strains and one strain each of Arcobacter butzleri, Arcobacter skirrowii, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica, Salmonella sp., and Shigella sp. These strains were selected based on phylogenetic similarities to Campylobacter (Arcobacter) spp. and potential growth as contaminants on plate media used for isolation of Campylobacter (Acinetobacter) spp. (5) and for comparison with other food-borne pathogens (Listeria monocytogenes). In December 2007, a new product (Campylobacter Latex test, reference no. 96143) was released to the market by Liofilchem Immunology, SRL (Italy), for the identification of Campylobacter jejuni. This test was not included in the evaluation. We are not aware of any microbiology company distributing this recent test from Italy in the United States.

Among the Campylobacter strains, those numbered *0.07 or *0.08 were isolated from pediatric enteritis patients at the Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa, in 2007 and 2008, as indicated in Table 1. These isolates were identified to the species level by the protocol outlined by Lastovica (2). The rest of the isolates belong to the culture collection of the Microbiology Laboratory, Department of Poultry Science, Auburn University. These strains are ATCC (American Type Culture Collection) strains or were isolated from food samples at Auburn University from 2005 to 2007. C. jejuni and C. coli strains have been identified with two multiplex PCR assays described elsewhere (4).

TABLE 1.

Strains of Campylobacter species used in these studies

Species Strain(s) Origin(s) No. positive/total
Microgen Oxoid PanBio
C. coli ATCC 33559, ATCC 43133, ATCC 43473, ATCC 43481, ATCC 49941, ATCC 51798, ATCC BAA-371, 175.07, 193.07, 219.07, 233.07, 1154, 1208, 1214, 1215, 1226, 1228, 1232, 1238, 1245, 1246, 1274, 1314, 1315, 1316, 1318, 1319, 1320, 1321, 1323, 1324, 1326, 1331, 1332, 1334, mCC 66 Human feces, swine feces, turkey feces, retail broiler meat, processed broiler 36/36 36/36 34/36
C. concisus 170.07, 173.07, 184.07, 186.07, 190.07, 196.07, 202.07, 204.07, 211.07, 214.07, 220.07, 226.07, 229.07, 230.07, 241.07, 252.07 Human feces 16/16 0/16 0/16
C. fetus subsp. fetus 221.07 Human feces 1/1 1/1 0/1
C. hyointestinalis 180.07, 208.07 Human feces 2/2 0/2 0/2
C. jejuni subsp. doylei 182.07, 228.07, 188.07, 251.07 Human feces 4/4 4/4 4/4
C. jejuni ATCC 33560, ATCC 35918, ATCC 700819, 168.07, 178.07, 183.07, 195.07, 199.07, 215.07, 244.07, 4.08, 10.08, 223.07, 225.07, 1003, 1049, 1204, 1207, 1212, 1216, 1229, 1230, 1231, 1233, 1234, 1243, 1262, 1265, 1266, 1269, 1279, 1286, 1288, 1300, 1302, 1303, 1304, 1313, 1317, 1322, 1328, 1329, 1335, 1336, 1337, 1338, 1340, 1341, 1342, 1343, 1345, 1347, mCC 5, mCC 248, CL 90, CL 93 Bovine feces, ovine fetal tissue, human feces, retail broiler meat, processed chicken 55/56 55/56 56/56
C. lari ATCC 35222, 238.07 Canine feces, human feces 2/2 2/2 2/2
C. upsaliensis ATCC 43953, 169.07, 172.07, 205.07, 217.07, 232.07, 236.07, 8.08 Canine feces, human feces 7/8 7/8 0/8

Table 1 shows the results of testing 125 Campylobacter strains with the three latex tests. The Microgen Campylobacter M46 test reacted with 123 strains of all eight Campylobacter spp. This test did not react with one C. jejuni (1266) and one C. upsaliensis (ATCC 43953) strain. Microgen Bioproducts specifies that the M46 Campylobacter test reacts with thermotolerant species such as C. jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis and emerging Campylobacter spp. such as C. jejuni subsp. doylei, C. concisus, and C. hyointestinalis. The Oxoid test reacted with 105 strains of six Campylobacter spp. This test failed to react with one C. jejuni strain (1266) and one C. upsaliensis strain (ATCC 43953), the same strains with which the Microgen test did not react. According to Oxoid, this test reacts only with thermotolerant species (C. jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, and C. upsaliensis). As stated by the manufacturer, the PanBio test reacted only with C. jejuni, C. coli, and C. lari. However, this test did not react with two C. coli strains (ATCC BAA-371 and 1315).

The Oxoid test was the only one that did not react with any of the non-Campylobacter bacterial strains tested (Table 2). The Microgen test reacted with an A. baumannii and a Listeria monocytogenes strain, but the reactions were in the form of large clumps and could easily be differentiated from the regular, fine agglutination seen with positive samples. The PanBio test reacted with two A. baumannii strains, and although one reaction was also in the form of large clumps, one strain yielded a very fine agglutination that was difficult to differentiate from the agglutination produced by a positive test.

TABLE 2.

Non-Campylobacter species tested in these studies

Species Strain Origin PanBio result Oxoid result Microgen result
Acinetobacter baumannii Cont. CCDA 77 Processed chicken
Acinetobacter baumannii Cont. CC 76 Processed chicken +a
Acinetobacter baumannii Cont. Line 93 Processed chicken
Acinetobacter baumannii Cont. 35918 Processed chicken
Acinetobacter baumannii Cont. 1 Processed chicken
Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 15308 NCTCb +c +a
Arcobacter butzleri ATCC 49616 Human feces
Arcobacter skirrowii ATCC 51400 Bovine lesions
Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19115 Human +a
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica ATCC BAA-664 Human feces
Salmonella sp. Clinical isolate Human feces
Shigella sp. Clinical isolate Human feces
a

Large clumping, not an actual agglutination.

b

NCTC, National Collection of Type Cultures (London, United Kingdom).

c

Fine-grain clumping, very similar to regular agglutination.

All three tests were simple and easy to use and had a reasonable shelf life when stored as directed by the manufacturer. Of the three tests, the most expensive is the Oxoid test, while the PanBio test is the least expensive. For the analysis of food samples, where C. jejuni and C. coli are the main suspected species and where large numbers of samples are tested, the PanBio test may be an economical option. However, cross-reactivity was evident with an A. baumannii strain, a common organism growing on agar plates used for Campylobacter isolation (5). Therefore, precise identification of Campylobacter isolates requires the use of phase-contrast microscopy or Gram staining to avoid misidentifications.

Our results indicate that the Microgen Campylobacter M46 test is the most appropriate for the testing of any Campylobacter isolates collected from human and food samples, even for Campylobacter spp. other than C. jejuni and C. coli.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 27 August 2008.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hodinka, R. L., and P. H. Gilligan. 1988. Evaluation of the Campyslide agglutination test for confirmatory identification of selected Campylobacter species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2647-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lastovica, A. J. 2006. Emerging Campylobacter spp.: the tip of the iceberg. Clin. Microbiol. Newsl. 2849-56. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nachamkin, I., and S. Barbagallo. 1990. Culture confirmation of Campylobacter spp. by latex agglutination. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28817-818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Oyarzabal, O. A., S. Backert, M. Nagaraj, R. S. Miller, S. K. Hussain, and E. A. Oyarzabal. 2007. Efficacy of supplemented buffered peptone water for the isolation of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli from broiler retail products. J. Microbiol. Methods 69129-136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Oyarzabal, O. A., K. S. Macklin, J. M. Barbaree, and R. S. Miller. 2005. Evaluation of agar plates for direct enumeration of Campylobacter spp. from poultry carcass rinses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 713351-3354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES