Abstract
The strength of an excitatory synapse depends on both the presynaptic release probability (pr) and the abundance of functional postsynaptic AMPA receptors. How these parameters are related or balanced at a single synapse remains unknown. By taking advantage of live fluorescence imaging in cultured hippocampal neurons where individual synapses are readily resolved, we estimate pr by labeling presynaptic vesicles with a styryl dye, FM1-43, while concurrently measuring postsynaptic AMPA receptor abundance at the same synapse by immunolabeling surface GluR2. We find no appreciable correlation between pr and the level of surface synaptic GluR2 under basal condition, and blocking basal neural activity has no effect on the observed lack of correlation. However, elevating network activity drives their correlation, which accompanies a decrease in mean GluR2 level. These findings provide the direct evidence that the coordination of pre- and postsynaptic parameters of synaptic strength is not intrinsically fixed but that the balance is tuned by synaptic use at individual synapses.
Keywords: hippocampal culture, synaptic strength, FM1-43, neurotransmitter release, glutamate receptor
In the classical Katz model of synaptic transmission, the weight of each synapse is determined by pr and quantal size (q), as pr × q (1, 2). Because q is largely governed by postsynaptic receptors, synapses have to regulate both pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms to control the overall synaptic strength. Across a population of synapses, pr (3) and postsynaptic receptor level (4) are highly heterogeneous. Therefore, it is of fundamental importance to identify how the relationship between pre- and postsynaptic strengths at individual synapses is organized. For instance, the balance between the two could be compensative, synergistic, or random. Amongst a synapse population, compensative balance would result in relatively uniform synaptic strengths. In contrast, synergistic balance would result in a biased or skewed distribution of synaptic strengths. Thus, the manner in which pre- and postsynaptic strengths are balanced might influence dendritic processing and operation of neural networks.
Previous studies on synaptic structure and physiology suggest for a positive correlation between pr and postsynaptic surface AMPA receptor level. For example, the number of AMPA receptors is correlated to postsynaptic density (PSD) size (5, 6), which, in turn, is matched to the presynaptic active zone length (7). Also, a larger presynaptic active zone supports a larger pool of readily releasable synaptic vesicles, resulting in higher pr (8, 9). In further support of the view that pr and postsynaptic surface AMPA receptor abundance are correlated, overexpression of postsynaptic proteins such as PSD-95, Shank, or GluR2 enhances AMPA receptor clustering and increases spine size, and these postsynaptic changes are, in turn, accompanied by enhanced presynaptic release (10–12). Nevertheless, beyond these reports, no studies to date have directly addressed how pr and postsynaptic AMPA receptor level are related to each other for governing basal synaptic strength.
Here, we address this issue in cultured hippocampal neurons by using live-imaging to determine pr and postsynaptic surface GluR2 abundance at individual synapses. We find no apparent correlation between pr and receptor abundance in either positive or negative way under normal culture condition. However, a positive correlation emerges after imposing enhanced neural network activity. These data indicate that the coordination between pre- and postsynaptic strengths is not intrinsically fixed, but that the balance can be regulated by neural activity at individual synapses.
Results
Estimation of pr.
To estimate pr at identified individual synapses, we took advantage of the styryl dye, FM1-43 to label recycling synaptic vesicles (3, 13, 14). Recurrent excitation during dye loading stimulation was prevented by including glutamate receptor antagonists, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX) and 2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV) in bath solution. Two FM1-43 fluorescence parameters were obtained: (i) quantal FM1-43 fluorescence intensity associated with a single synaptic vesicle, q (in arbitrary fluorescence units), and (ii) FM1-43 fluorescence gained at an individual synapse, F, on stimulation with 30 action potentials (APs) at 1 Hz; pr was then expressed as the number of synaptic vesicles labeled per AP, where pr = F/q/30. To estimate q by optical quantal analysis, neurons were stimulated with 7 APs at 0.5 Hz (Fig. 1A). Fig. 1B shows an example of FM1-43 fluorescence image after such minimal loading. The distribution of signal intensity of FM1-43 puncta was plotted and fitted to a sum of Gaussian distributions with even spacing, in which the fluorescence corresponding to the first peak was taken as the value of q (Fig. 1C). We estimated quantal FM1-43 fluorescence intensity each time when we performed FM1-43 measurements of F by using the same experimental setting including solutions and culture batch. On average, q was 593 ± 18 (mean ± SEM, n = 12), and there was no significant difference in q values between neurons cultured at 14–15 days in vitro (DIV) (611 ± 20, n = 7) and 20–22 DIV (572 ± 34, n = 5; P = 0.13, Mann–Whitney U test), the two culture ages we used. The distribution of pr obtained by this method was comparable to previous reports [supporting information (SI) Fig. S1 and ref. 3].
To compare pr across many synapses, it was critical to have a sufficiently sensitive method for detecting the possible differences. We tested this point by examining the effect of varying extracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]o) to deliberately change pr at individual boutons. We loaded FM1-43 by 7 APs in various [Ca2+]o ranging from 0.8 to 5 mM; pr increased from 0.26 to 0.44 in parallel with [Ca2+]o increase (Fig. 1D). Importantly, the quantal FM1-43 fluorescence signal did not significantly change as a function of [Ca2+]o (Fig. 1E). Thus, our quantal analysis of FM1-43 fluorescence was sensitive enough to detect approximately a two-fold range in pr associated with different [Ca2+]o.
Of the two parameters for calculating pr, F was obtained by FM1-43 loading protocol of 30 APs at 1 Hz, and the dye was left in the external bath solution for an additional 30 s after the AP train to allow for compensative endocytosis that occurs within ≈30 s (15). This protocol induced repetitive release with little presynaptic short-term plasticity (ref. 16 and data not shown), thus enabling for an estimate of basal pr. Whereas recurrent AP firing was blocked by CNQX and APV, synaptic vesicles could undergo spontaneous release and endocytosis during the period of FM1-43 loading. We tested if such spontaneous release events contributed to our estimation of pr. We compared the extent FM1-43 loading of vesicles between our standard AP-triggered (evoked) protocol and with spontaneous activity alone for the same duration (70 s) (Fig. 2 A and B). As reported previously (17), pr and spontaneous event frequency were positively correlated (Spearman rank correlation, r = 0.65, P < 0.0001; Fig. 2C), confirming that high pr synapses show more frequent spontaneous release events. However, the average spontaneous release event constituted a small proportion of the evoked release (7.4 ± 1.5%; Fig. 2D), and majority of synapses (77 out of 107) displayed no spontaneous release events during the FM1-43 loading period. Therefore, spontaneous release has negligible or very minor impact on our estimation of pr.
Preferential Expression of GluR2 in Spiny Neurons.
To quantify the abundance of surface AMPA receptors at the synapse, we monitored GluR2, the predominant AMPA receptor subunit at mature synapses in hippocampal cultures (18). We reasoned that, in contrast to the GluR1 subunit that forms Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors and whose surface expression is highly regulated by activity in hippocampal neurons, GluR2 surface levels might more closely represent constitutive postsynaptic strength (19, 20). Surface GluR2 was live-labeled by using an antibody against the extracellular epitope of GluR2 (21); previous reports had indicated that antibodies could penetrate the native synaptic cleft (22, 23). The GluR2 labeling showed clear, discrete fluorescence puncta that colocalized with an excitatory postsynaptic marker, PSD-95 (Fig. S2E). We noticed that some neurons did not express detectable level of GluR2. To characterize these neurons, we randomly expressed CFP to correlate neuronal morphology with GluR2 labeling. We found that almost all GluR2-expressing neurons were spiny (10 out of 10 cells; Fig. S2 A and B), whereas GluR2-lacking neurons were either spiny or aspiny (four spiny and three aspiny out of seven cells; Fig. S2 C and D). In contrast, GluR1 was expressed in most neurons (data not shown). Because the principal pyramidal neurons are spiny, whereas most interneurons are aspiny in the hippocampus, by examining GluR2 expression we have limited our study to putative pyramidal neurons.
Concurrent Estimation of pr and Surface GluR2 Level at Single Synapses.
We next combined pr estimation by using FM1-43 with live-labeling of surface GluR2. Living cultured neurons were incubated with anti-GluR2 antibody for 15 min, followed by Alexa594-conjugated secondary antibody for a further 15 min. Neurons were then subjected to FM1-43 labeling protocol (30 AP at 1 Hz), as described above to load recycling vesicles. Fig. 3A shows an example overlay image of FM1-43 and GluR2 signals. For the analysis we chose all pairs of overlapping FM1-43 and GluR2 puncta that were well isolated from others (Fig. 3 B and C), and the relationship between pr and GluR2 level was examined by scatter plots (Fig. 3 D–G). At 14–15 DIV, after a period of robust synaptogenesis when synapses were fully functional, we did not find any apparent correlation between the two parameters (Fig. 3 D and F). To test if such a lack of correlation reflected some aspect of developmental immaturity, we examined the relationship in older cultures at 20–22 DIV. We again did not see an obvious correlation between pr and postsynaptic GluR2 level (Fig. 3 E and G). These data suggest that under normal culture condition, pre- and postsynaptic strengths are not coordinated, despite the presence of spontaneous activity that triggers synaptic communication between pre- and postsynaptic terminals.
Enhancing Neural Excitability Increases the Correlation Between pr and Postsynaptic GluR2 Level.
Our finding that pr and postsynaptic receptor abundance were not correlated under basal condition raised a possibility that the balance between the two could be regulated by changes in network activity. To examine this point, we tested the effect of elevating activity by increasing the extracellular KCl concentration by 5 mM while blocking inhibitory inputs with 10 μM bicuculline, a GABAA receptor antagonist. After enhanced activity treatment for 2 days (48 to 54 h), pr and GluR2 level were correlated in both 14–15 DIV and 20–22 DIV neurons (Fig. 4 A and B). Comparison with control nontreated cultures indicated that the correlation was attributable to the preferential down-regulation of GluR2 at low pr synapses. Whereas the KCl/bicuculline treatment did not measurably alter the distribution of pr, the overall surface GluR2 level was decreased (Fig. 4 C–F and Fig. S3), which was consistent with synaptic scaling of AMPA receptors as reported previously (24). The lack of an apparent change in pr is likely due to the mild activity-enhancing condition used in the present study (25). These data suggest that an increase in network activity and the resulting increased synaptic usage promotes the coordination of pr and postsynaptic GluR2 level. The correlation increased to similar extents in both 14–15 DIV and 20–22 DIV cultures. Therefore, coordination of pre- and postsynaptic strengths likely occurs by modulating existing synapses rather than involving synapse formation, because younger cultures with a higher capacity for synapse formation does not show a preferential increase in correlation.
Effect of Activity Blockade on the Relationship Between pr and Postsynaptic GluR2 Level.
Whereas enhanced activity drove the coordination of pre- and postsynaptic strengths, we did not observe an appreciable correlation under basal condition when neurons showed spontaneous spiking. To examine the contribution, if any, of basal spontaneous excitatory activity in matching of pr and GluR2 abundance, we treated neurons with 10 μM CNQX and 50 μM APV for 2 days before FM1-43 and GluR2 imaging. After complete blockade of excitatory transmission, pr was significantly increased (Fig. 5 C and D and Fig. S3), as previously reported (26). However, the relationship between pr and GluR2 level remained uncorrelated at both 14–15 DIV and 20–22 DIV (Fig. 5 A and B). We also examined the effect of tetrodotoxin (TTX), a sodium channel blocker, to inhibit spontaneous spikes. Again, the relationship between pr and GluR2 level was not significantly altered after 2 days of activity suppression (Fig. S3 and Fig. S4). Therefore, it is unlikely that an intrinsic, activity-independent mechanism coordinates pr and surface GluR2 level.
Discussion
Synaptic strength is governed by both pr and the number of functional postsynaptic receptors. It has not been easy to quantify both parameters at the level of single synapses. Whereas electrophysiology offers high sensitivity and great temporal resolution, recording evoked synaptic responses from a single bouton containing a single release site is technically challenging. Electron microscopy is another possible technique, although it is very laborious to concurrently measure pr (e.g., by FM1-43 photoconversion) and postsynaptic receptor abundance (e.g., by immuno-gold labeling) from large population of synapses. To overcome these difficulties, we combined two fluorescence live-imaging techniques: measurements of pr, by using FM1-43 (3, 13, 14), and live-labeling of postsynaptic surface GluR2 receptors (20, 21). We found that pr and postsynaptic surface GluR2 abundance are not appreciably correlated under basal culture condition. However, enhancing activity by raising extracellular K+ and silencing GABAergic inputs resulted in their correlation. Our data provides the direct evidence that pr and postsynaptic AMPAR abundance are not necessarily correlated by an intrinsic mechanism as synaptic contacts are formed, but neural activity drives their correlation at single synapses.
FM1-43 is a useful tool to study synaptic vesicle recycling (27, 28), enabling the tracking of single synaptic vesicle dynamics (3, 13, 14). Despite its established usefulness, FM1-43 imaging poses potential technical limitations for estimating pr. Such limitations could arise from the dependence on an indirect, compensatory endocytosis for FM1-43 loading of vesicles, and the relatively high background fluorescence attributable to the lipophilic nature of the styryl dye. Our method was sufficiently sensitive for detecting variable pr on altering extracellular Ca2+, at least approximately a two-fold range. This range was narrower than that predicted by previous studies of Ca2+-dependence of neurotransmitter release examined by whole-cell patch clamp recordings in cultured hippocampal neurons (29, 30), and thus, our ability to detect very low pr synapses with low signal-to-noise may have been compromised. Nevertheless, activity-induced correlation between pr and GluR2 abundance occurred by the preferential loss of GluR2 at low pr synapses. This observation suggested that low pr synapses as identified by our measure were not inherently noisy and did not necessarily mask the possible correlation under control conditions. The contribution from spontaneously recycling synaptic vesicles that could bias the measurements of pr was also minimal under our experimental conditions.
Another technique we used was live-labeling of surface GluR2 receptors. We reasoned that GluR2 might be a suitable indicator of postsynaptic strength, because excitatory synaptic currents in glutamatergic hippocampal neurons are primarily mediated by GluR2-containing AMPA receptors, whereas GluR2-lacking AMPA receptors are suggested to be recruited transiently in the process of postsynaptic plasticity (19, 20). As an added advantage, selecting GluR2-positive neurons that were mostly spiny, a feature shared by most pyramidal neurons in hippocampal CA3 to CA1 regions, allowed sampling of data from a relatively uniform population of neurons rather than from mixed neuronal types present in the culture. During the 30-min incubation with the primary and secondary antibodies, certain amount of GluR2 may undergo endocytosis (31) or lateral diffusion to nonsynaptic sites (32), thereby escaping their detection at the synaptic surface. Thus, our estimate of the receptor abundance is likely to provide a lower limit, although the turnover of basal AMPA receptors is slow, with <10% of the receptors being endocytosed in 10 min. Additional source of error in the GluR2 measurements concerns the accessibility of the antibody for synaptic GluR2. Whereas the synaptic cleft (≈20 nm) is of comparable size to the IgG (≈15 nm in the maximum dimension), antibodies have been shown to penetrate the synaptic cleft in live preparations (22, 23). Also, a recent in vivo study has suggested that synaptic cleft sizes can be at least two fold wider than the previous estimates based on ultrastructural analysis of fixed tissue (33). Whereas synaptic junctions may appear stable, their adhesive state could be dynamic in living neurons (34, 35), permitting the passage of IgG, which has flexible hinge regions. Importantly, GluR2 labeling colocalized with PSD-95 signals, and showed clear, distinct punctae that neatly apposed the presynaptic FM1-43 signal. Thus, most extracellularly labeled GluR2 signals represented synaptic receptors, thereby validating our method for assessing postsynaptic GluR2 level.
Our finding of a lack of correlation between pr and the GluR2 abundance was somewhat unexpected. Previous observations have led to the popular assumption that pr and postsynaptic potency are matched (see above), such that high pr synapses have a higher number of receptors compared with low pr synapses. Whereas these studies may have involved synapses that have already experienced substantial activity, a condition we have found to enhance the correlation, our overall findings are in agreement with other previous reports suggesting that pr may not necessarily correlate with postsynaptic receptor number. For example, BDNF increases active zone size but not quantal amplitude (36), showing the dissociation between regulation of active zone size and functional synaptic AMPA receptor abundance. Mismatch of active zone size and PSD size can also occur in vivo, as seen on conditional ablation of delta2 glutamate receptor gene in the adult mouse cerebellum (37). Therefore, the relationship between active zone and PSD size or AMPA receptor abundance are not always stereotypically fixed and there are mechanisms that differentially set these parameters.
Neural activity can modulate the structure and function of both the pre- and the postsynaptic terminals in many ways. Here, we find that the enhancement of network activity drives the coordination of pre- and postsynaptic strengths, resulting in emergence of their correlation. Candidate underlying mechanism could involve synaptic adhesion proteins that link the pre- and postsynaptic terminals and organize presynaptic vesicle clusters (38) and postsynaptic AMPA receptors (39, 40) in an activity-dependent manner (38, 39). Notably, a postsynaptic complex of neuroligin, the binding partner of presynaptic neurexin, and PSD-95, a postsynaptic scaffold protein, can retrogradely regulate pr (41). Therefore, adhesion protein complexes display features expected of a machinery that fine-tunes the balance of pre- and postsynaptic strengths according to the level of activity that the synapse experiences. Interestingly, when the correlation between pre- and postsynaptic strengths was promoted by activity enhancement, the mean GluR2 abundance was reduced but the mean pr was not significantly changed in the present experimental condition. This observation may perhaps imply that the modification of postsynaptic strength is more responsive in such activity-dependent coordination of pre- and postsynapse.
We found that spontaneous activity in the basal culture condition was not sufficient to drive the pre- and postsynaptic correlation. This result may be because spontaneous activity was not sufficiently strong or patterned, at least in our dissociated cultures. It would be of interest to examine how such coordination is organized in vivo, where physiological spontaneous activity shapes the pattern of synaptic connections during development. Our data show that low pr synapses are most affected by the increased activity, where their GluR2 level is reduced. Such a change may share mechanisms with activity-dependent pruning or elimination of excess synapses that occur in developing neurons.
Methods
Cell Culture.
Dissociated cultures of hippocampal CA1-CA3 neurons were prepared from P0 rats as described previously with minor modifications (16, 28). In some experiments, cells were treated with TTX (1 μM), CNQX (10 μM) + APV (50 μM), or KCl (5 mM) + bicuculline (10 μM) for 2 days before FM1-43 experiments. Neurons were used for experiments at 14–15 and at 20–22 DIV. Animal care and use were approved by the U.K. Home Office. For details, see SI Methods.
Live-Labeling of GluR2.
Neurons were first labeled with 5 μg/ml anti-GluR2 monoclonal antibody (MAB397, Chemicon) in culture medium for 15 min. After a brief wash, secondary labeling with 5 μg/ml Alexa594-conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibody (Invitrogen) was for an additional 15 min in culture medium. Coverslips were then immediately used for FM1-43 experiments. For details, see SI Methods.
FM1-43 Experiment.
Basic set up for FM1-43 experiments was as described previously (28). Neurons were loaded with FM1-43 (10 μM, Invitrogen) by 7 or 30 APs evoked by 2 ms, 20 V square pulses; 30 s after the end of stimulation, excess dye was washed with EBS containing 1 mM Advasep-7 (Biotium) for 1 min, then with EBS with 0.1 mM Ca2+ for 5 to 10 min. After replacing with normal EBS (2 mM Ca2+), images were acquired before and after unloading stimulation by 600 APs at 20 Hz for three rounds with 15-s intervals. The remaining signals were taken as background. For details, see SI Methods.
Image Analysis.
Images were analyzed with NIH ImageJ. To quantify FM1-43 fluorescence, background signals were subtracted, and total fluorescence intensities of each puncta were measured. Fitting of FM1-43 signal to sum of three or five Gaussian distributions with even spacing was performed by Igor Pro (WaveMetrics) by using the following equation as reported previously (3, 12, 13):
Ai is the amplitude of ith peak, x is integrated fluorescence intensity, q is the quantal fluorescence of FM1-43 signal, and σ0 is the variance of fluorescence of background, σv is the variance of fluorescence of FM1-43 signal from single vesicle. To estimate q, FM1-43 was loaded by 7 AP at 0.5 Hz.
For the measurement of pr, FM1-43 was loaded by 30 APs at 1 Hz. After subtracting background, pr was estimated by pr = F/q/30, where F was integrated fluorescence intensity of a FM1-43 punctum, and q was quantal FM1-43 fluorescence measured from other independent coverslips on the same day. When the effect of changing [Ca2+]o was examined, FM1-43 was loaded by 7 APs at 0.5 Hz.
To quantify GluR2 signals, background (nonpunctate region) was subtracted, and total fluorescence intensities of each puncta were measured. We restricted our analysis to synapses with partially or completely overlapping pairs of presynaptic FM1-43 punctum and postsynaptic GluR2 punctum. Puncta contacting multiple partners were discarded.
Statistics.
Spearman rank correlation with tie correction, Steel's multiple-comparison test, Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S) test, and Mann–Whitney U test were used as required. P value of <0.05 was taken as significant. Data are shown as mean ± SEM unless otherwise noted.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments.
We thank Y.G. laboratory members for help and discussion, and T. Branco, L. Cingolani, and N. Vitureira for critical comments on the manuscript. H.T. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship for research abroad from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. This work was supported by the Medical Research Council and the European Commission Framework VI (EUSynapse project, LSHM-CT-2005-019055).
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0805705105/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Del Castillo J, Katz B. Quantal components of the end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1954;124:560–573. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Del Castillo J, Katz B. Statistical factors involved in neuromuscular facilitation and depression. J Physiol. 1954;124:574–585. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Murthy VN, Sejnowski TJ, Stevens CF. Heterogeneous release properties of visualized individual hippocampal synapses. Neuron. 1997;18:599–612. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80301-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Matsuzaki M, et al. Dendritic spine geometry is critical for AMPA receptor expression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:1086–1092. doi: 10.1038/nn736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Takumi Y, Ramirez-Leon V, Laake P, Rinvik E, Ottersen OP. Different modes of expression of AMPA and NMDA receptors in hippocampal synapses. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:618–624. doi: 10.1038/10172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tanaka J, et al. Number and density of AMPA receptors in single synapses in immature cerebellum. J Neurosci. 2005;25:799–807. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4256-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Schikorski T, Stevens CF. Morphological correlates of functionally defined synaptic vesicle populations. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:391–395. doi: 10.1038/86042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rosenmund C, Stevens CF. Definition of the readily releasable pool of vesicles at hippocampal synapses. Neuron. 1996;16:1197–1207. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80146-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dobrunz LE, Stevens CF. Heterogeneity of release probability, facilitation, and depletion at central synapses. Neuron. 1997;18:995–1008. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80338-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.El-Husseini AE, Schnell E, Chetkovich DM, Nicoll RA, Bredt DS. PSD-95 involvement in maturation of excitatory synapses. Science. 2000;290:1364–1368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sala C, et al. Regulation of dendritic spine morphology and synaptic function by Shank and Homer. Neuron. 2001;31:115–130. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00339-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Passafaro M, Nakagawa T, Sala C, Sheng M. Induction of dendritic spines by an extracellular domain of AMPA receptor subunit GluR2. Nature. 2003;424:677–681. doi: 10.1038/nature01781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ryan TA, Reuter H, Smith SJ. Optical detection of a quantal presynaptic membrane turnover. Nature. 1997;388:478–482. doi: 10.1038/41335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Aravanis AM, Pyle JL, Tsien RW. Single synaptic vesicles fusing transiently and successively without loss of identity. Nature. 2003;423:643–647. doi: 10.1038/nature01686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Balaji J, Ryan TA. Single-vesicle imaging reveals that synaptic vesicle exocytosis and endocytosis are coupled by a single stochastic mode. Proc Natil Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:20576–20581. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707574105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Morales M, Colicos MA, Goda Y. Actin-dependent regulation of neurotransmitter release at central synapses. Neuron. 2000;27:539–550. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00064-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Prange O, Murphy TH. Correlation of miniature synaptic activity and evoked release probability in cultures of cortical neurons. J Neurosci. 1999;19:6427–6438. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-15-06427.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pickard L, Noël J, Henley JM, Collingridge GL, Molnar E. Developmental changes in synaptic AMPA and NMDA receptor distribution and AMPA receptor subunit composition in living hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 2000;20:7922–7931. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-21-07922.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Plant K, et al. Transient incorporation of native GluR2-lacking AMPA receptors during hippocampal long-term potentiaon. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:602–604. doi: 10.1038/nn1678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sutton MA, et al. Miniature neurotransmission stabilizes synaptoic function via tonic suppression of local dendritic protein synthesis. Cell. 2006;125:785–799. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Patrick GN, Bingol B, Weld HA, Schuman EM. Ubiquitin-mediated proteasome activity is required for agonist-induced endocytosis of GluRs. Curr Biol. 2003;13:2073–2081. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2003.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dahan M, et al. Diffusion dynamics of glycine receptors revealed by single-quantum dot tracking. Science. 2003;302:442–445. doi: 10.1126/science.1088525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tardin C, Cognet L, Bats C, Lounis B, Choquet D. Direct imaging of lateral movements of AMPA receptors inside synapses. EMBO J. 2003;22:4656–4665. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Turrigiano GG, Leslie KR, Desai NS, Rutherford LC, Nelson SB. Activity-dependent scaling of quantal amplitude in neocortical neurons. Nature. 1998;391:892–896. doi: 10.1038/36103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Branco T, Staras K, Darcy KJ, Goda Y. Local dendritic activity sets release probability at hippocampal synapses. Neuron. 2008;59:475–485. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Murthy VN, Schikorski T, Stevens CF, Zhu Y. Inactivity produces increases in neurotransmitter release and synapse size. Neuron. 2001;32:673–682. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00500-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Betz WJ, Bewick GS. Optical analysis of synaptic vesicle recycling at the frog neuromuscular junction. Science. 1992;255:200–203. doi: 10.1126/science.1553547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tokuoka H, Goda Y. Myosin light chain kinase is not a regulator of synaptic vesicle trafficking during repetitive exocytosis in cultured hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 2006;26:11606–11614. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3400-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Goda Y, Stevens CF. Two components of transmitter release at a central synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:12942–12946. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fernández-Chacón R, et al., editors. Synaptotagmin I functions as a calcium regulator of release probability. Nature. 2001;410:41–49. doi: 10.1038/35065004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shepherd JD, Huganir RL. The cell biology of synaptic plasticity: AMPA receptor trafficking. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2007;23:613–643. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.23.090506.123516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Groc L, Choquet D. AMPA and NMDA glutamate receptor trafficking: Multiple roads for reaching and leaving the synapse. Cell Tissue Res. 2006;326:423–438. doi: 10.1007/s00441-006-0254-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Thorne RG, Nicholson C. In vivo diffusion analysis with quantum dots and dextrans predicts the width of brain extracellular space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;103:5567–5572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509425103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Colicos MA, Collins BE, Sailor MJ, Goda Y. Remodeling of synaptic actin induced by photoconductive stimulation. Cell. 2001;107:605–616. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00579-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tai CY, Mysore SP, Chiu C, Schuman EM. Activity-regulated N-cadherin endocytosis. Neuron. 2007;54:771–785. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tyler WJ, Pozzo-Miller LD. BDNF Enhances Quantal Neurotransmitter Release and Increases the Number of Docked Vesicles at the Active Zones of Hippocampal Excitatory Synapses. J Neurosci. 2001;21:4249–4258. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-12-04249.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Takeuchi T, et al. Control of synaptic connection by glutamate receptor delta2 in the adult cerebellum. J Neurosci. 2005;25:2146–2156. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4740-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bamji SX, et al. Role of beta-catenin in synaptic vesicle localization and presynaptic assembly. Neuron. 2003;40:719–731. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00718-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Okuda T, Yu LM, Cingolani LA, Kemler R, Goda Y. Beta-Catenin regulates excitatory postsynaptic strength at hippocampal synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:13479–13484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702334104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Saglietti L, et al. Extracellular interactions between GluR2 and N-cadherin in spine regulation. Neuron. 2007;54:461–477. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Futai K, et al. Retrograde modulation of presynaptic release probability through signaling mediated by PSD-95-neuroligin. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:186–195. doi: 10.1038/nn1837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.