Skip to main content
Journal of the National Medical Association logoLink to Journal of the National Medical Association
. 2000 Nov;92(11):528–532.

Effect of timed incentives on subject participation in a study of long-term breast cancer survivors: are there ethnic differences?

K Ashing-Giwa 1, P A Ganz 1
PMCID: PMC2568330  PMID: 11152085

Abstract

The recruitment and retention of African Americans into cancer control studies presents a formidable task to the scientific and policy communities as well as patient and advocacy communities. The purpose of this investigation was to assess the role of a timed incentive schedule on response rates in a study of African American and white breast cancer survivors. A mailed quality-of-life survey battery was sent to 583 breast cancer survivors (50% African American, 50% white). Half of the participants received payment in advance, whereas the other half was promised payment. The overall response rate was 54% (n = 278). The timing of incentives did not affect participation rates in either ethnic group. About 51% of the respondents were from the payment-in-advance condition and 49% were from the paid-on-completion condition. Therefore, we conclude that payment on completion may be the more cost-effective approach in studies with higher socioeconomic status patients, such as this sample of breast cancer survivors.

Full text

PDF
528

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashing-Giwa K., Ganz P. A., Petersen L. Quality of life of African-American and white long term breast carcinoma survivors. Cancer. 1999 Jan 15;85(2):418–426. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990115)85:2<418::aid-cncr20>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ashing-Giwa K. The recruitment of breast cancer survivors into cancer control studies: a focus on African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 1999 May;91(5):255–260. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Camuñas C., Alward R. R., Vecchione E. Survey response rates to a professional association mail questionnaire. J N Y State Nurses Assoc. 1990 Sep;21(3):7–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Choi B. C., Pak A. W., Purdham J. T. Effects of mailing strategies on response rate, response time, and cost in a questionnaire study among nurses. Epidemiology. 1990 Jan;1(1):72–74. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199001000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deehan A., Templeton L., Taylor C., Drummond C., Strang J. The effect of cash and other financial inducements on the response rate of general practitioners in a national postal study. Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Feb;47(415):87–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Perneger T. V., Etter J. F., Rougemont A. Randomized trial of use of a monetary incentive and a reminder card to increase the response rate to a mailed health survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Nov 1;138(9):714–722. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schweitzer M., Asch D. A. Timing payments to subjects of mail surveys: cost-effectiveness and bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Nov;48(11):1325–1329. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00040-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the National Medical Association are provided here courtesy of National Medical Association

RESOURCES