Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

Emerging Infectious Diseases logoLink to Emerging Infectious Diseases
. 2008 Mar;14(3):479–483. doi: 10.3201/eid1403.0760

Methicillin-Resistant and -Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Sequence Type 398 in Pigs and Humans

Alex van Belkum *, Damian C Melles *,, Justine K Peeters *, Willem B van Leeuwen *, Engeline van Duijkeren , Xander W Huijsdens , Emile Spalburg , Albert J de Neeling , Henri A Verbrugh *; on behalf of the Dutch Working Party on Surveillance Research of MRSA (SOM)
PMCID: PMC2570802  PMID: 18325267

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398 (ST398 MRSA) was identified in Dutch pigs and pig farmers. ST398 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus circulates among humans at low frequency (0.2%) but was isolated in 3 human cases of bacteremia (2.1%; p = 0.026). Although its natural host is probably porcine, ST398 MRSA likely causes infections in humans.

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus; MRSA; sequence type 398; virulence; nasal carriage, dispatch


Nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage has increased in pig farmers, and specific lineages of S. aureus are shared by farmers and their animals (1,2). In addition, rates of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) by veterinary personnel working with pigs is high (35). The pig-related MRSA appears to be clonal and was identified by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) as sequence type 398 (2,6,7). Such resistant bacterial strains can spread from animals to the environment, which may facilitate the colonization of persons who are not involved in animal husbandry (8). The porcine MRSA strain has been isolated from humans with invasive and superficial infections, and familial outbreaks of colonization and cross-colonization have been documented (2,6,7).

We sought to determine whether the clinical effect of the porcine ST398 MRSA strain can be substantiated by the existence of genetically homologous, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains among healthy or infected persons. The international MLST database (www.mlst.net) (9) listed only 1 ST398 MSSA nasal carriage isolate from a patient in Cape Verde. In addition, 1 ST398 MRSA strain was isolated from a woman living in Groningen, the Netherlands, without further clinical and epidemiologic data available. ST398 MSSA nasal carriage isolates were also identified in several pig farmers in a study by Armand-Lefevre et al. (1). We describe the population genetic analysis of Dutch community-based and nosocomial MSSA isolates in comparison with pig- and pig farmer–derived ST398 MRSA isolates, performed by spa-sequencing and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis (10,11).

The Study

Most of the ST398 MRSA strains studied were collected at the Dutch Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands). A total of 20 strains were isolated from the nares of pigs in several slaughterhouses (RIVM 21–40) (12), whereas 18 additional strains were detected during in-hospital screenings for MRSA carriage among Dutch farmers from independent farms (RIVM 1–8, 10–12 and 14–20). In addition, 8 clinical and carriage isolates were obtained from the Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Centre in Utrecht (Table).

Table. Survey of demographic and clinical data of the ST398 pig-associated MRSA (n = 46) and ST398 MSSA (n = 6) strains, the Netherlands*.

Isolate no. Source Infection Site of sampling City mecA PVL spa type SCCmec
RIVM-1 Human No Nose Putten Pos Neg t011 IVa
RIVM-2 Human Yes Urine Rosmalen Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-3 Human No Nose Gendringen Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-4 Human Yes Wound/abscess Helden Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-5 Human No Sputum Amsterdam Pos Neg t011 V
RIVM-6 Human Yes Urine Zeeland Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-7 Human No Throat/nose Bennekom Pos Neg t898 III
RIVM-8 Human No Sputum Kootwijkerbroek Pos Neg t011 V
RIVM-10 Human Yes Wound/abscess Galder Pos Neg t567 III
RIVM-11 Human Yes Wound/abscess Olburgen Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-12 Human No Sputum Sas van Gent Pos Neg t011 IVa
RIVM-14 Human Yes Nose Siebengewald Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-15 Human No Sputum Grijpskerke Pos Neg t034 V
RIVM-16 Human No Sputum Harskamp Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-17 Human Yes Wound/abscess Haarlem Pos Pos t034 III
RIVM-18 Human Yes Sputum Heeswijk dinther Pos Neg t108 III
RIVM-19 Human Yes Perineum Veenoord Pos Neg t571 III
RIVM-20 Human Yes Wound/abscess Roggel Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-21 Pig No Nose Venray Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-22 Pig No Nose Heeze-leende Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-23 Pig No Nose Barneveld Pos Neg t011 IVa
RIVM-24 Pig No Nose Dalfsen Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-25 Pig No Nose Gemert-bakel Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-26 Pig No Nose Venray Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-27 Pig No Nose Venray Pos Neg t011 V
RIVM-28 Pig No Nose Alphen-chaam Pos Neg t011 IVa
RIVM-29 Pig No Nose Hoogeveen Pos Neg t1254 IVa
RIVM-30 Pig No Nose Skarsterlân Pos Neg t1254 IVa
RIVM-31 Pig No Nose Someren Pos Neg t011 V
RIVM-32 Pig No Nose Someren Pos Neg t1255 V
RIVM-33 Pig No Nose Zundert Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-34 Pig No Nose Baarle-nassau Pos Neg t108 V
RIVM-35 Pig No Nose Hofvantwente Pos Neg t011 IVa
RIVM-36 Pig No Nose Zwolle Pos Neg t011 IVa
RIVM-37 Pig No Nose Alphen-chaam Pos Neg t011 V
RIVM-38 Pig No Nose Ijselstein Pos Neg t011 IVa
RIVM-39 Pig No Nose Ijselstein Pos Neg t011 IVa
RIVM-40 Pig No Nose Dalfsen Pos Neg t567 III
6302/3 Pig Yes Skin Utrecht Pos Neg t011 IV
6303/6 Pig Yes Nose Utrecht Pos Neg t011 IV
6303/7 Pig Yes Nose Utrecht Pos Neg t011 IV
6303/9 Pig No Nose Utrecht Pos Neg t011 IV
6303/11 Pig No Nose Utrecht Pos Neg t011 IV
6303/1 MRSA1 Human No Nose Utrecht Pos Neg t011 IV
6303/1 MRSA2 Human No Nose Utrecht Pos Neg t011 IV
V0606303/8 Pig Yes Nose Utrecht Pos Neg t011 IV
T0976 Human No Nose Rotterdam Neg Neg t571
TE5029 Human No Nose Rotterdam Neg Neg t571
TB27855 Human Yes Blood Rotterdam Neg Neg t571
TB28395 Human Yes Blood Rotterdam Neg Neg t571
TB29854 Human Yes Blood Rotterdam Neg Neg t571
TDV0002580 Gorilla Yes Ear Velp Neg Neg t034

*MRSA; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; MSSA, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus; ST398, sequence type 398; PVL, Panton-Valentine leukocidin; SCCmec, staphylococcal chromosome cassette; pos, positive; neg, negative. All isolates were nontypeable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and confirmed as ST398 by multilocus sequence typing.

Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis was performed as described previously (10). A total of 147 marker fragments per strain were scored, and a binary table with marker absence [0] or presence [1] was constructed. A total of 30 fragments with differential occurrence, when genetically heterogeneous MSSA and ST398 MRSA fingerprints were compared, were reamplified and sequenced (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Fragments were sequenced for 3 independent strains, and the consensus was analyzed by using BLAST (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast). Typing of the staphylococcal chromosome cassette (SCCmec) and the presence of the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) genes was performed by PCR.

We embedded the genetic fingerprints of the 46 pig-related MRSA isolates in the population structure of S. aureus as obtained before (10,11). These studies include high throughput AFLP fingerprints of 829 nonclinical S. aureus human carriage isolates and 146 and 77 (including 2 MRSA isolates) clinical isolates of human and animal origin, respectively. All carriage strains were isolated from volunteers living in the Rotterdam region, where pig farms are absent.

Sequencing of the repetitive region of the protein A gene spa was performed for all ST398 MRSA isolates (13). Data were analyzed by using the Ridom Staphtype software version 1.4 (www.ridom.de/staphtype).

Analysis of the AFLP data was performed as described previously (10). Both hierarchical cluster analysis and principle component analysis were performed with Spotfire DecisionSite 7.2 software (www.spotfire.com). We used the Fisher exact test to compare the distribution of strain categories in different phylogenetic lineages. A 2-sided p value <0.05 was considered significant.

The AFLP analysis of the ST398 MRSA strains derived from human and animal sources (n = 46) indicated that these strains are highly clonal. When the AFLP patterns for the ST398 strains were included in the overall population analysis for Dutch MSSA strains from carriage and infection, the distinct cluster was still observed (Figure 1). Few Dutch MSSA strains from the Rotterdam region coclustered with the ST398 pig-related MRSA isolates (Figure 1, panel B). In total, 6 (0.6%) MSSA isolates coclustered with the ST398 MRSA isolates, of which 2 were nasal carriage isolates from healthy persons (Table). Of the 6 strains, 3 were blood culture isolates taken from 3 elderly patients. All 3 patients had nosocomial bacteremia: 1 after inflammatory aneurism of the aorta, 1 during Fournier gangrene, and the last 1 after primary ventricular fibrillation. Epidemiologic data exclude a cluster of nosocomial infections; patients were not in direct contact (data not shown).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A) Meta-analysis of the amplified fragment length polymorphism data obtained for the pig-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398 (ST398 MRSA) and its closely related methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains, carriage MSSA isolates from healthy children and elderly persons, invasive MSSA from hospitalized children and elderly persons, and invasive animal S. aureus isolates (including 2 MRSA isolates) (10,11). Green and red represent 161,700 binary outcomes generated by high throughput restriction fragment length polymorphism with 147 marker fragments. Marker absence corresponds with green, marker presence corresponds with red, and gray represents ambiguous positions (i.e., weak bands), scored as marker absence in the mathematical analyses. ST398 MRSA strains are boxed. The dendrogram on the left shows the phylogenetic strain clustering; the dendrogram on the x-axis shows marker clustering. Marker groups are cluster specific. Markers on the right are defined as follows: blue, carriage isolates (n = 829); black, bacteremia isolates (n = 146); yellow, animal isolates (n = 77); red, ST398 MRSA isolates (n = 46); pink, reference strains (Mu50/N315). B) Detail highlighting the ST398 isolates. Markers and lanes on the right are defined as follows: black, carriage isolate; red, clinical isolate; 1, ST398 MRSA isolated from humans; 2, ST398 MRSA isolated from pigs; 3, ST398 MSSA human carriage isolates; 4, ST398 MSSA human bacteremia isolates; 5, ST398 MSSA animal clinical isolate.

After principle component analysis , the ST398 MRSA strains still clustered as a separate group (Figure 2). The AFLP analysis did not distinguish strains from pigs or pig farmers, and only a limited number of polymorphic AFLP fragments were seen. AFLP markers that were positive for the ST398 MRSAs and absent from the other strains, or vice versa, were sequenced. Of 30 fragments analyzed, 9 were ≈100% specific for the pig-associated strains. Another 3 fragments were present in a subset of the pig-associated strains only. Of these 12 fragments, 4 were not homologous with current entries in the GenBank database, including the 10 S. aureus full-genome sequences. Of the 12 pig-specific markers, 8 were homologous with known sequences, which suggests that these markers become pig-specific by point mutations in the AFLP primer annealing site(s) rather than by genomic rearrangement. Several of the sequences encode factors were associated with membranes or transport.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Principal component analysis analysis of the amplified fragment length polymorphism data obtained for the pig-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398 (ST398 MRSA) and its closely related methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) strains, carriage MSSA isolates from healthy children and elderly persons, invasive MSSA from hospitalized children and elderly persons, and invasive animal S. aureus isolates (including 2 MRSA isolates). The cubes, plotted in 3-dimensional space, represent all of the strains displayed in Figure 1, panel A. Each axis represents the score calculated for that strain on each principal component. The distribution is shown from 2 different angles. ST398 strains are circled. Blue, carriage isolates (n = 829); black, bacteremia isolates (n = 146); yellow, animal isolates (n = 77); red, ST398 MRSA isolates (n = 46); pink, reference strains (Mu50/N315).

The preponderance of types t011 and t108 was confirmed by spa sequencing (12). These made up >75% of all cases. However, the other types all belonged to the same family of spa types, which suggests recent drift in the sequence motifs. The t011 types are primarily associated with SCCmec IV and IVa, whereas the t108 type is nearly fully associated with SCCmec V. This finding suggests that ST398 MRSA has arisen independently on at least 2 occasions. Finally, SCCmec III is found in association with t108, t898, t567, t034, and t571. This finding suggests promiscuous dissemination of this cassette among the ST398 MRSA. Strain RIVM-17 harbored the PVL genes. Apparently, the bacteriophage carrying these genes found its way into the porcine ST398 MRSA lineage.

Conclusions

The massive colonization of Dutch pigs with a single sequence type of MRSA was unexpected (12). Molecular strain typing was initially compromised because PFGE failed (14). Spa gene sequencing (13) showed heterogeneity in the ST398 MRSA lineage with types t011 and t108, which are closely related, covering >75% of all isolates. Hence, 1 or 2 new MRSA lineages had been discovered. We found a degree of genetic association between spa types and the presence of certain SCCmec cassettes, which suggests bacterial evolution and horizontal DNA exchange in the zoonotic reservoir.

We found that ST398 is rare among Dutch MSSA strains colonizing healthy persons (2 [0.2%] of 829 strains). However, a relatively high number of MSSA isolates homologous to the ST398 MRSA were derived from bacteremic patients (3 [2.1%] of 146; p = 0.026). These 3 bacteremia isolates were not related epidemiologically; they were isolated from different patients in different medical departments over an extended period. This finding suggests that these MSSA strains are quite virulent. The strict segregation of ST398 strains (Figure 1, panel A; Figure 2) corroborates that the strains belong to a separate biotype associated with pigs (15).

Our findings pose a warning to public health surveillance: if the ST398 MSSA virulence toward humans would be maintained within the ST398 MRSA lineage from pigs, care should be taken not to introduce this strain into humans. We consider it to be likely that ST398 MRSA from pigs is capable of causing serious infection in humans even though its primary host seems to be pigs.

Biography

Dr van Belkum is with the Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. His research interests include MRSA.

Footnotes

Suggested citation for this article: van Belkum A, Melles DC, Peeters JK, van Leeuwen WB, van Duijkeren E, Huijsdens XW, et al. Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398 in pigs and humans. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2008 March [date cited]. Available from http://www.cdc.gov/EID/content/14/3/479.htm

References

  • 1.Armand-Lefevre L, Ruimy R, Andremont A. Clonal comparison of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from healthy pig farmers, human controls, and pigs. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:711–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Witte W, Strommenger B, Stanek C, Cuny C. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in humans and animals, Central Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:255–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hanselman BA, Kruth SA, Rousseau J, Low DE, Willey BM, McGeer A, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in veterinary personnel. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1933–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Voss A, Loeffen F, Bakker J, Klaassen C, Wulf M. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1965–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wulf M, van Nes A, Eikelenboom-Boskamp A, de Vries J, Melchers W, Klaassen C, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary doctors and students, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1939–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ekkelenkamp MB, Sekkat M, Carpaij N, Troelstra A, Bonten MJ. Endocarditis due to meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus originating from pigs [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006;150:2442–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Huijsdens XW, van Dijke BJ, Spalburg E, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Heck ME, Pluister GN, et al. Community-acquired MRSA and pig-farming. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2006;5:26. 10.1186/1476-0711-5-26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gibbs SG, Green CF, Tarwater PM, Mota LC, Mena KD, Scarpino PV. Isolation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria from the air plume downwind of a swine confined or concentrated animal feeding operation. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114:1032–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Feil EJ, Enright MC. Analyses of clonality and the evolution of bacterial pathogens. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004;7:308–13. 10.1016/j.mib.2004.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Melles DC, Gorkink RF, Boelens HA, Snijders SV, Peeters JK, Moorhouse MJ, et al. Natural population dynamics and expansion of pathogenic clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:1732–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.van Leeuwen WB, Melles DC, Alaidan A, Al-Ahdal M, Boelens HA, Snijders SV, et al. Host- and tissue-specific pathogenic traits of Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:4584–91. 10.1128/JB.187.13.4584-4591.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.de Neeling AJ, van den Broek MJ, Spalburg EC, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Dam-Deisz WD, Boshuizen HC, et al. High prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs. Vet Microbiol. 2007;122:366–72. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.01.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Harmsen D, Claus H, Witte W, Rothganger J, Turnwald D, Vogel U. Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5442–8. 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5442-5448.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bens CC, Voss A, Klaassen CH. Presence of a novel DNA methylation enzyme in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with pig farming leads to uninterpretable results in standard pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:1875–6. 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1875-1876.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Devriese LA. A simplified system for biotyping Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from animal species. J Appl Bacteriol. 1984;56:215–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Emerging Infectious Diseases are provided here courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

RESOURCES