Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2008 Oct 24;283(43):29593–29601. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802493200

Phospholipase Cγ2 Mediates RANKL-stimulated Lymph Node Organogenesis and Osteoclastogenesis*

Yabing Chen , Xiaohong Wang §, Lie Di , Guoping Fu , Yuhong Chen , Li Bai , Jianzhong Liu , Xu Feng , Jay M McDonald ‡,∥, Sue Michalek **, Yinghong He , Mei Yu , Yang-Xin Fu ‡‡, Renren Wen , Hui Wu §,1, Demin Wang ¶,2
PMCID: PMC2570883  PMID: 18728019

Abstract

Phospholipase Cγ2 (PLCγ2) is an important signaling effector of multiple receptors in the immune system. Here we show that PLCγ2-deficient mice displayed impaired lymph node organogenesis but normal splenic structure and Peyer's patches. Receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) is a tumor necrosis factor family cytokine and is essential for lymph node organogenesis. Importantly, PLCγ2 deficiency severely impaired RANKL signaling, resulting in marked reduction of RANKL-induced activation of MAPKs, p38 and JNK, but not ERK. The lack of PLCγ2 markedly diminished RANKL-induced activation of NF-κB, AP-1, and NFATc1. Moreover, PLCγ2 deficiency impaired RANKL-mediated biological function, leading to failure of the PLCγ2-deficient bone marrow macrophage precursors to differentiate into osteoclasts after RANKL stimulation. Re-introduction of PLCγ2 but not PLCγ1 restores RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation of PLCγ2-deficient bone marrow-derived monocyte/macrophage. Taken together, PLCγ2 is essential for RANK signaling, and its deficiency leads to defective lymph node organogenesis and osteoclast differentiation.


PLCγ2 is a lipid enzyme, and activation of PLCγ2 hydrolyzes phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate to generate diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (1, 2). Both diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate are important second signaling messengers for diverse cellular responses (1, 2). Diacylglycerol activates protein kinase C (PKC),3 whereas inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate mediates the mobilization of Ca2+ from internal stores, resulting in a transient intracellular Ca2+ flux (1). Activated PKC, via a three component complex composed of CARMA1 (CARD, membrane-associated guanylate kinase, MAGUK, protein 1), Bcl10 (B-cell lymphoma protein 10), and MALT1 (mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation protein 1), leads to the activation of IκB kinase (3-5). Activated IκB kinase then phosphorylates a family of cytoplasmic inhibitory proteins IκB, triggering its ubiquitination and proteolysis by the proteasome complex (5). Ultimately, the degradation of IκB releases sequestration of transcription factors of the NF-κB family in the cytoplasm, leading to its nuclear localization and activation of its target genes (6, 7). Meanwhile, the elevated intracellular Ca2+ binds to calmodulin, activating the serine/threonine phosphatase calcineurin. Activation of calcineurin leads to dephosphorylation of the transcription factor NFAT, resulting in its translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and ultimate activation of its target genes (8). Moreover, the PLCγ/Ca2+/PKC pathway has been shown to participate in the activation of all types of MAP kinases (ERKs, JNKs, and p38 MAPKs) (9-13) even though PKC-independent Grb2/SOS/Raf1 pathway plays a primary role in the activation of MAPKs (10, 14, 15). Activated PKC can promote activation of ERK-1 and ERK-2 and is required for the maximum activation of p38 MAPK (12, 13, 16). In addition, calcium and PKC are involved in JNK activation (12, 13). Ultimately, the activation of the three MAP kinase leads to the activation of transcription factors, including AP-1 (17-19).

PLCγ2 is primarily expressed in hematopoietic cell lineages (1). Targeted gene disruption studies have revealed a critical role of PLCγ2 in multiple receptor-mediated biological functions. PLCγ2 is essential for pre-B cell receptor (BCR)- and BCR-mediated B cell development and functions, and its deficiency affects early B cell development and severely impairs B cell maturation and responses to antigen challenges (20-23). PLCγ2 is also a critical component of FcRγ chain-containing collagen receptor signaling pathways, and deficiency of PLCγ2 results in platelet dysfunction and fetal hemorrhage (20). In addition, PLCγ2 participates in FcεR signaling, and its deficiency impairs FcεR-induced degranulation and cytokine secretion in mast cells (24). Last, PLCγ2 correlates with defective FcγR-mediated ADCC (antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity) activity in NK cells (20) and is involved in signaling of the major activating receptor, NKG2D, of the NK cells (25, 26), wherein PLCγ2 deficiency disrupts NKG2D-mediated NK cell maturation and function (27, 28).

Receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) is a tumor necrosis factor family cytokine (29, 30). RANKL is essential for early lymphocyte development and lymph node organogenesis (31, 32). RANKL also mediates the final differentiation of bone marrow derived monocyte/macrophage precursors (BMMs) into osteoclasts (29, 30, 32), whereas macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) controls the survival and proliferation of these precursors (33). RANKL deficiency impairs the early development of both T and B cells and blocks the formation of lymph nodes, resulting in immunodeficiency disease (32).

Upon binding to its receptor RANK, RANKL initiates the recruitment of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM)-containing adaptor proteins, DAP12 and the γ chain of Fc receptor (FcRγ), and tumor necrosis factor receptor associated factor 6 (TRAF6), an important signaling molecule, to the receptor complex (34-38). Then, RANKL activates multiple pathways, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), such as ERK, JNK, and p38, and Ca2+-dependent pathways (39-42). Ultimately, RANKL leads to activation of transcription factors, including NFATc1, NF-κB, and AP-1 (42-45). Gene disruption studies have demonstrated the important role of DAP12, FcRγ, TRAF6, NFATc1, NF-κB, and c-Fos, a component of AP-1, in RANKL-mediated biological functions (34-37, 42, 46, 47). Although Ca2+-dependent NFATc1 and PKC-dependent NF-κB pathways are indispensable for RANKL signaling, the PLC isoforms responsible for activation of these pathways is not known.

Here we demonstrate that PLCγ2 is activated upon RANKL stimulation. Importantly, deficiency of PLCγ2 severely impairs RANKL signaling and results in the lack of lymph node organogenesis in mice.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Mice—PLCγ2-/- mice were as previously described (20). Bone morphology assessment was performed with age- and gender-matched PLCγ2-/- and wild-type control littermates. All animal usage followed the guideline of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and the Blood Research Institution at the BloodCenter of Wisconsin.

Antibodies and Reagents—Rabbit polyclonal anti-ERK (sc-93), anti-p38 (sc-535), and anti-JNK2 (sc-572) antibodies and mouse monoclonal anti-PLCγ1 (sc-7290), anti-PLCγ2 (sc-5283), anti-phospho-ERK (pThr202/pTyr204, sc-7383), and anti-NFATc1 (sc-7294) antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-p38 (pThr180/pTyr182, #9216) and mouse monoclonal anti-phospho-JNK (pThr183/pTyr185, #9255) antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Mouse monoclonal anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase antibodies (RDI-TRK5G4-6C5) were purchased from Research Diagnostics Inc. Mouse monoclonal anti-actin antibodies (MAB1501R) were purchased from CHEMICON. Fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse CD14 (11-041), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE)-conjugated anti-mouse Mac-1 (12-0112), PE-conjugated anti-mouse CD115 (c-Fms) (12-1152), PE-conjugated anti-mouse RANK (12-6612) fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated Rat IgG2a isotype control (11-4321), and PE-conjugated Rat IgG2b isotype control (12-4031) were purchased from eBiosciences. Murine M-CSF was purchased from R&D Systems. Glutathione S-transferase-RANKL was purified as previously described (48).

Deriving BMMs and RANKL-mediated Differentiation of BMMs in VitroIn vitro osteoclastogenesis was performed as previously described (49, 50). Briefly, bone marrow (BM) cells were isolated from long bones of 8-12-week-old PLCγ2-/- and wild-type control littermates. The cells were grown in complete α-MEM (Invitrogen) with murine M-CSF (10 ng/ml) for 72 h. Then the nonadherent BMMs were cultured with glutathione S-transferase-RANKL (100 ng/ml) and M-CSF (10 ng/ml). Cell differentiation was examined by TRAP staining according to the manufacturer's instruction (Sigma).

The osteoclast-specific gene expression was detected as previously described (51). Briefly, total RNA was isolated from the indicated cells with TRIzol reagents, reverse-transcribed, and amplified with primers for mouse TRAP, CTR, Cath K, and RANK. Expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was used as a loading control. RT-PCR and quantitative real-time PCR was performed and analyzed using SYBR Green I Supermix (Bio-Rad) in a Bio-Rad i-Cycler. Primers and conditions for PCR assays were as following: RANK, 5′-TTTGTGGAATTGGGTCAATGAT-3′ and 5′-ACCTCGCTGACCAGTGTGAA-3′; TRAP, 5′-GACGATGGGCGCTGACTTCA-3′ and 5′-GCGCTTGGAGAGATCTTAGAGT-3′; Cath K, 5′-ACGAGGCATCGACTCTGAA-3′ and 5′-GATGCCAAGCTTGCGTCGAT-3′; CTR, 5′-GACAACTGCTGGCTGAGTG-3′ and 5′-GAAGCAGTAGATAGTCGCCA-3′. Standard curves were generated for all PCR assays. PCR conditions were 95 °C for 7 min followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, 68 °C for 30 s, and then 68 °C for 7 min.

Retroviral Transduction of BMMs of PLCγ1 and PLCγ2—The retroviral transduction was as previously described (22). Briefly, rat PLCγ1 or rat PLCγ2 gene has been cloned into a vector with bicistronic retrovirus murine stem cell virus promoter-internal ribosome entry site (IRES)-GFP to generate GFP-IRES-PLCγ1 and GFP-IRES-PLCγ2 vectors. Conditioned media containing high titer, amphotropic retrovirus particles derived from 293T cells were filtered and used for transduction. Wild-type and PLCγ2-/- BMMs were exposed to filtered conditioned media that contained PLCγ1 or PLCγ2 retrovirus for 2 days, and subsequently RANKL (100 ng/ml) and M-CSF (10 ng/ml) were added. Retrovirus with GFP alone served as the control. Media were changed every other day. The effects on osteoclastogenesis were determined by TRAP staining and normalized by measuring infection efficiency assessed by GFP expression.

Western Blot Analysis—Cells were lysed, and cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis as previously described (52). For measuring activation of MAPKs, nonadherent BM cells were cultured in complete α-MEM with 10% fetal bovine serum and murine M-CSF (10 ng/ml) for 3 days. The cells were then starved in serum-free media for 6 h followed by stimulation with RANKL (100 ng/ml) for the indicated times. Subsequently, the cells were lysed and subjected to Western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies. For measuring up-regulation of NFATc1, nonadherent BM cells were cultured in complete α-MEM with 10% fetal bovine serum and murine M-CSF (10 ng/ml) for 2.5 days. The cells were then stimulated with RANKL (100 ng/ml) for 2.5 days and then subjected to Western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies.

Gel Mobility Shift Assays—For AP-1, nonadherent BM cells were cultured in complete α-MEM with 10% fetal bovine serum and murine M-CSF (10 ng/ml) for 3 days. The cells were cultured in serum-free medium with or without RANKL (100 ng/ml) or M-CSF (10 ng/ml) for 16 h. Nuclear extracts were prepared for gel mobility shift assays using 32P-labeled probes containing AP-1 binding (purchased from Promega) or Oct-1 binding (purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology) sequences. For NF-κB, nonadherent BM cells were cultured in complete α-MEM with 10% fetal bovine serum and murine M-CSF (10 ng/ml) for 3 days. The cells were starved in serumfree medium for 18 h and then stimulated with RANKL (100 ng/ml) for the indicated times. Nuclear extracts were prepared for gel mobility shift assays using 32P-labeled probes containing NF-κB (purchased from Promega) or Oct-1 binding sequences.

Bone Histomorphometry Analysis—Femurs were removed from the indicated mice and fixed in 10% formalin, decalcified in EDTA, and embedded in paraffin. Longitudinal sections (5 μm thick) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Bone histomorphometry analysis was performed as previously described (53) with Bioquant image Analysis Software (R & M Biometrics). Various bone parameters, including bone thickness, osteoid surface, and osteoblast and osteoclast numbers were determined. Goldner's Trichrome staining was performed as previously described (53).

Statistical Analysis—Statistical analysis was performed as previously described (54). The differences between two groups were identified by Student's t tests. For multiple groups, one-way analysis of variance and Student-Newman-Keuls tests were used to identify differences. Significance was defined as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

PLCγ2 Deficiency Impairs Lymph Node Organogenesis—We examined the effect of PLCγ2 deficiency on lymph node organogenesis. Anatomical analysis of secondary lymphoid organs demonstrated that PLCγ2-/- mice displayed dramatically impaired mesenteric, cervical, mandibular, inguinal, axillary, para-aortic, and popliteal lymph nodes compared with wild-type mice (Fig. 1A and data not shown). Thus, PLCγ2 deficiency severely impairs lymph node organogenesis, similar to either the lack of lymphotoxin pathway or RANKL pathway.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Lymph node organogenesis in PLCγ2-deficient mice. A, the absence of mesenteric lymph nodes in PLCγ2-deficient mice. Shown is a macroscopic view of mesenteric lymph nodes from wild-type (PLCγ2+/+) and PLCγ2-deficient (PLCγ2-/-) mice. Lymph nodes are indicated by the arrowheads. B, presence of Peyer's patches in PLCγ2-deficient mice. Small intestines derived from wild-type and PLCγ2-deficient mice were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin to visualize morphology of Peyer's patches. C, intact splenic architecture in PLCγ2-/- mice. Spleens derived from wild-type and PLCγ2-deficient mice were sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin to visualize their architecture.

Previous studies have linked the formation of lymph node with that of Peyer's patch and splenic architecture in the lymphotoxin pathway but not in the RANKL pathway. Lymphotoxin-deficient mice lack lymph nodes and also display defects in the formation of Peyer's patch and exhibit disorganized splenic architecture (55-58). Interestingly, despite the severe defects of all lymph nodes in PLCγ2-/- mice, the mutant mice had normal Peyer's patches compared with wild-type mice (Fig. 1B). Moreover, PLCγ2-/- mice exhibited intact splenic architecture, including normal distribution of red and white pulp and normal primary follicle structure, including T- and B-cell areas and marginal zones (Fig. 1C and data not shown). Taken together, these data demonstrate that PLCγ2 is essential for lymph node but not Peyer's patch or splenic architecture formation, which is consistent with the role of RANKL.

PLCγ2 Is Activated by RANKL in BMMs—RANKL has been shown to play an essential role in lymph node organogenesis (32). The critical role of PLCγ2 in lymph node organogenesis prompted us to determine the role of PLCγ2 in RANKL-mediated signaling and biological functions. BMMs are derived from BM cells upon M-CSF treatment (33). RANK, the receptor for RANKL on BMMs, mediates their final differentiation (29, 30, 32). To determine whether PLCγ2 is involved in RANKL signaling, we first examined its expression in BMMs by Western blot analysis. Wild-type BMMs expressed high levels of PLCγ2 proteins, whereas PLCγ2-/- BMMs lacked the protein (Fig. 2A). In addition, wild-type BMMs also expressed PLCγ1, the other family member of PLCγ, and PLCγ2 deficiency had no effect on the expression of PLCγ1 in the cells (Fig. 2A).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Activation of PLCγ2 by RANKL in BMMs and normal expression of RANK in PLCγ2-deficient BMMs. A, expression of PLCγ1 and PLCγ2 in BMMs. BMMs were derived from wild-type (PLCγ2+/+) and PLCγ2-deficient (PLCγ2-/-) mice. Cell lysates (20 μg) from the cells were subjected to direct Western blot analysis with anti-PLCγ2, anti-PLCγ1, or anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GASDH) antibodies. B, activation of PLCγ2 by RANKL in BMMs. Wild-type BMMs were stimulated with RANKL (100 ng/ml) for 0, 2, 5, and 15 min. Subsequently, the cell lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis with anti-phospho-PLCγ2 or anti-PLCγ2 antibodies. C, normal expression of RANK in PLCγ2-deficient BMMs. BMMs were derived from wild-type and PLCγ2-/- mice. The BMMs were stained with fluorescence-conjugated anti-CD14, anti-Mac-1, anti-c-Fms, or anti-RANK antibodies. Levels of CD14, Mac-1, c-Fms, or RANK expression were measured by flow cytometry. All figures shown are representative of three independent analyses.

Next, we examined whether PLCγ2 plays a role in RANKL signaling. BMMs derived from wild-type mice were stimulated with RANKL, and activation of PLCγ2 was measured by its tyrosine phosphorylation, which is known to correlate with its lipase activity (59-62). RANKL induced activation of PLCγ2 by as early as 2 min (Fig. 2B). Taken together, these data demonstrate that PLCγ2 is expressed in BMMs and is activated by RANKL.

PLCγ2 Deficiency Severely Impairs RANKL Signaling—To further determine whether PLCγ2 plays an important role in RANKL signaling, we examined the effect of PLCγ2 deficiency on RANKL signaling. BMMs were derived from wild-type and PLCγ2-/- mice. Both BMMs expressed comparable levels of myeloid cell lineage markers CD14 and Mac-1 (Fig. 2C). PLCγ2-/- BMMs also displayed normal levels of M-CSF receptor c-Fms relative to wild-type cells (Fig. 2C). Importantly, PLCγ2-/- BMMs exhibited normal levels of RANK relative to wild-type cells (Fig. 2C). Therefore, lack of PLCγ2 does not affect M-CSF-mediated BMM development or reduce RANK expression on these precursors.

Then we examined RANKL-mediated MAPK, such as ERK, p38, and JNK, activation in PLCγ2-deficient BMMs. Activation of ERK1 and ERK2 was evaluated by immunoblotting with antibodies that detect phosphorylation of pThr202//pTyr204 and pThr185//pTyr187 within ERK1 and ERK2, respectively (63, 64). Both ERK1 and ERK2 were activated by RANKL in PLCγ2-/- identically to activation in wild-type BMMs (Fig. 3A). In contrast, RANKL-induced activation of p38, which was evaluated by immunoblotting with antibodies detecting phosphorylation of pThr180/pTyr182 within p38 (65), was markedly reduced in PLCγ2-/- relative to wild-type BMMs (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, RANKL-mediated activation of JNK, which was measured by immunoblotting with antibodies detecting phosphorylation of pThr183/pTyr185 within JNK1/2 (66), was reduced in PLCγ2-/- relative to wild-type BMMs (Fig. 3C). Therefore, PLCγ2 deficiency specifically impairs RANKL-mediated activation of p38 and JNK but not ERK.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

RANKL-mediated activation of MAPK family members ERK, p38, and JNK and transcription factors NFATc1, NF-κB, and AP-1 in PLCγ2-deficient BMMs. BMMs were derived from wild-type (PLCγ2+/+) or PLCγ2-deficient (PLCγ2-/-) mice. A, RANKL-mediated activation of ERK1 and ERK2 in PLCγ2-deficient BMMs. BMMs were starved in serum-free media for 6 h followed by stimulation with RANKL for 0, 5, 10, or 30 min. Subsequently, the cell lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis with anti-phospho-ERK and anti-ERK. B, RANKL-mediated activation of p38 in PLCγ2-deficient BMMs. The cell lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis with anti-phospho-p38 and anti-p38. C, RANKL-mediated activation of JNK in PLCγ2-deficient BMMs. The cell lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis with anti-phospho-JNK and anti-JNK. D, RANKL-mediated activation of NFATc1 in PLCγ2-deficient BMMs. BMMs were stimulated with RANKL for 2.5 days, and the cell lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis with anti-NFATc1 and anti-actin. E, RANKL-mediated activation of NF-κBinPLCγ2-deficient BMMs. BMMs were starved in serum-free medium for 18 h and then stimulated with RANKL (100 ng/ml) for 0, 15, or 30 min. Nuclear extracts were subjected to gel mobility shift assays using 32P-labeled probes containing NF-κB or Oct-1 binding sequences. F, RANKL-mediated activation of AP-1 in PLCγ2-deficient BMMs. BMMs were cultured in serum-free medium with or without RANKL or M-CSF for 16 h. Nuclear extracts were subjected to gel mobility shift assays using 32P-labeled probes containing AP-1-binding or Oct-1-binding sequences.

RANKL signaling eventually results in activation of transcription factors, including NFAT, NF-κB, and AP-1, which are important for its function (42-45). Thus, we examined the effect of PLCγ2 deficiency on RANKL-induced activation of NFAT, NF-κB, and AP-1. As expected, RANKL induced up-regulation of NFATc1 expression in wild-type BMMs (Fig. 3D), consistent with a previous study (42). In contrast, RANKL-induced expression of NFATc1 was severely impaired in PLCγ2-/- BMMs (Fig. 3D). Moreover, in gel mobility shift assays, RANKL-induced activation of NF-κB was markedly reduced in PLCγ2-/- relative to wild-type BMMs (Fig. 3E). Last, RANKL activated AP-1 in wild-type but not PLCγ2-/- BMMs (Fig. 3F). Importantly, M-CSF-mediated activation of AP-1 was comparable in wild-type and PLCγ2-/- BMMs (Fig. 3F). Of note, Oct-1 binding was comparable in every lane in both gel mobility shift assays, demonstrating equal protein loading for each sample (Fig. 3, E and F). Taken together, PLCγ2 deficiency impairs RANKL-mediated activation of NFATc1, NF-κB, and AP-1.

PLCγ2 Deficiency Severely Impairs RANKL-mediated Osteoclast Formation—Last, we examined the effect of PLCγ2 deficiency on RANKL-mediated biological function. In the presence of M-CSF, RANKL induced wild-type BMMs to differentiate into giant multinucleated and TRAP-positive osteoclasts, whereas PLCγ2-/- BMMs failed to become multinucleated osteoclasts, although some of them became TRAP-positive (Fig. 4A). Moreover, semiquantitative RT-PCR demonstrated that RANKL-induced expression of TRAP and other osteoclast-associated genes, such as Cath K and CTR, was markedly impaired in PLCγ2-/- compared with wild-type BMMs (Fig. 4B). Of note, both wild-type and PLCγ2-/- BMMs expressed comparable levels of RANK before and after RANKL stimulation (Fig. 4B), consistent with the results from fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis shown in Fig. 2C. Furthermore, the marked impairment of RANKL-induced expression of TRAP, Cath K, and CTR in PLCγ2-/- cells was confirmed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR analyses (Fig. 4C). Taken together, these data demonstrate that PLCγ2 deficiency impairs RANKL-mediated biological functions, e.g. expression of osteoclastogenesis-associated genes, TRAP, Cath K, and CTR.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

PLCγ2 deficiency severely impairs RANKL-mediated cell differentiation. A, RANKL-induced cell differentiation of PLCγ2-deficient BMMs in vitro. BMMs derived from wild-type and PLCγ2-deficient mice were cultured with RANKL and M-CSF for 6 days. The cells were stained with TRAP staining and visualized by light microscopy. B, RT-PCR analyses of RANKL-induced expression of differentiation associated genes in PLCγ2-deficient BMMs. RANKL-stimulated BMMs from A were subjected to RT-PCR analyses of expression of the indicated genes. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. C, real-time RT-PCR analyses of RANKL-induced expression of differentiation associated genes in PLCγ2-deficient BMMs. RANKL-stimulated BMMs from A were subjected to quantitative real-time RT-PCR analyses of expression of the indicated genes. The expression data of each gene were normalized to the levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase expression. D, an increased bone mineral density of femurs derived from PLCγ2-deficient mice. Femurs derived from wild-type (PLCγ2+/+) and PLCγ2-deficient (PLCγ2-/-) mice were subjected to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of bone mineral density. E, histology of the femurs from PLCγ2-deficient mice by Goldner's Trichrome and microcomputed tomography evaluation. Femurs derived from wild-type and PLCγ2-deficient mice were subjected to Goldner's Trichrome (upper) and microcomputed tomography evaluation (lower). The figures shown A, D, and E are representative of six pairs of age- and gender-matched wild-type and PLCγ2-deficient littermates. The figures shown in B and C are representative of three independent analyses.

Furthermore, we examined the effect of PLCγ2 deficiency on RANKL-mediated osteoclast development in vivo. We evaluated the bone morphology of PLCγ2-deficient mice. The bone mineral density of femurs derived from wild-type and PLCγ2-/- mice was analyzed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (67). Femurs from PLCγ2-/- mice exhibited an increased bone mineral density compared with those from wild-type mice (Fig. 4D). Histological examination of the femurs using Goldner's Trichrome staining also revealed a marked increase in bone density in PLCγ2-/- relative to wild-type littermate control mice (Fig. 4E, upper). Microcomputed tomography evaluation of the femurs further demonstrated that bone density in PLCγ2-/- mice was markedly increased compared with wild-type littermate controls (Fig. 4E, lower). Moreover, quantitative measurements of the ratio of trabecular bone volume (BV) to total bone volume (TV), BV/TV, an indicator of bone mass, showed a 2-fold increase in PLCγ2-/- relative to wild-type mice, and importantly, the increased bone volume in PLCγ2-/- mice was associated with a decreased number of osteoclasts (N.Oc/Bs) and decreased osteoclast surface (OcS/Bs) (data not shown). These data demonstrate that PLCγ2 is important for RANKL-mediated biological function in vivo.

PLCγ2 but Not PLCγ1 Restores RANKL-mediated Biological Functions of PLCγ2-/- BMMs—The impaired RANKL-mediated biological functions by PLCγ2 deficiency could be due to other genes that were affected during the targeted disruption of the PLCγ2 locus. To exclude this possibility, we assessed the ability of PLCγ2 to restore RANKL-induced differentiation of PLCγ2-/- BMMs. We employed a retrovirus-mediated gene transfer strategy (68, 69). PLCγ2-/- BMMs were infected in vitro with a retrovirus, MSCV-PLCγ2-IRES-GFP, encoding PLCγ2. As controls, PLCγ2-/- BMMs transduced with a retrovirus, MSCV-IRES-GFP, encoding GFP alone served as a negative control, whereas wild-type BMMs infected with MSCV-IRES-GFP served as a positive control. Subsequently, the retrovirally transduced BMMs were treated with RANKL in the presence of M-CSF. As expected, upon RANKL stimulation, GFP-transduced wild-type BMMs differentiated into osteoclasts, whereas GFP-transduced PLCγ2-/- BMMs failed to differentiate into osteoclasts (Fig. 5A). Importantly, PLCγ2-transduced PLCγ2-/- BMMs were able to differentiate into osteoclasts after RANKL treatment (Fig. 5A). As expected, PLCγ2 expression was restored in PLCγ2-transduced PLCγ2-/- BMMs (Fig. 5B). Thus, a lack of PLCγ2 directly disrupts RANKL-mediated biological functions.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

PLCγ2 but not PLCγ1 restores RANKL-induced cell differentiation of PLCγ2-deficient BMMs. BMMs derived from wild-type (PLCγ2+/+) or PLCγ2-deficient (PLCγ2-/-) mice were infected in vitro without a retrovirus (-) or with MSCV-IRES-GFP, encoding GFP alone (GFP), MSCV-PLCγ1-IRES-GFP, encoding PLCγ1 (PLCγ1), or MSCV-PLCγ2-IRES-GFP, encoding PLCγ2 (PLCγ2). A, RANKL-induced cell differentiation of the retrovirally transduced BMMs. The retrovirally transduced BMMs were cultured with RANKL in the presence of M-CSF for 6 days, and cell differentiation was determined by TRAP-straining. B, the expression of PLCγ1 and PLCγ2 in the retrovirally transduced PLCγ2-deficient BMMs. The retrovirally transduced PLCγ2-deficient BMMs were subjected to Western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies. The figures shown are representative of three independent experiments. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

PLCγ1, the other family member of PLCγ, might play a similar role as PLCγ2 in RANKL signaling. Although PLCγ1 is expressed in BMMs and its expression is not affected by PLCγ2 deficiency (Fig. 2A), it is possible that overexpression of PLCγ1 might compensate for PLCγ2 deficiency in RANKL-mediated osteoclastogenesis. To test this hypothesis, we assessed the ability of PLCγ1 to restore RANKL-mediated biological functions in PLCγ2-/- BMMs. PLCγ2-/- BMMs were infected in vitro with a retrovirus, MSCV-PLCγ1-IRES-GFP, encoding PLCγ1. PLCγ1-transduced PLCγ2-/- BMMs failed to differentiate into osteoclasts upon RANKL treatment (Fig. 5). Of note, the level of PLCγ1 expression was markedly increased in PLCγ1-relative to GFP- or PLCγ2-transduced PLCγ2-/- BMMs (Fig. 5B). Thus, PLCγ2 plays an important and unique role which cannot be replaced by the highly homologous PLCγ1 in RANKL-mediated biological functions.

DISCUSSION

RANKL is an important cytokine for early lymphocyte development and lymph node organogenesis (29-32). The Ca2+-dependent activation of NFAT and the PKC-dependent activation of NF-κB are indispensable for RANKL-mediated biological functions (42, 46). RANKL is a tumor necrosis factor family cytokine (29, 30), and thus, the mechanism by which RANKL activates the Ca2+-dependent pathway has been a puzzle (42). The recruitment of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-containing adaptor proteins, DAP12 and FcRγ, to the RANK receptor complex has been shown to play a role in RANKL-induced Ca2+-flux (34-36). PLCγ2 is involved in signaling of the FcRγ-chain-containing collagen receptor (20) and the DAP12-associated NKG2D receptor (27, 28). Here we report that PLCγ2 plays a critical role in RANKL-induced activation of p38, JNK, AP-1, NF-κB, and NFAT and in RANKL-mediated lymph node organogenesis and osteoclastogenesis. It is highly possible that immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-containing DAP12 and FcRγ may play a role in RANKL-mediated activation of PLCγ2. Consistent with this notion, deficiency of DAP12 or FcRγ disrupts RANKL-induced signaling and RANKL-mediated biological functions such as osteoclastogenesis, a defect very similar to that observed in PLCγ2-/- mice (34-36, 70).

Although PLCγ2 deficiency severely impairs RANKL signaling and RANKL-mediated cell differentiation, PLCγ2-/- mice exhibit markedly reduced osteoclasts that appear normal grossly. It is plausible that PLCγ1 isoform, which is expressed in BMMs, may compensate PLCγ2 deficiency in RANKL-mediated biological function in vivo. PLCγ1 and PLCγ2 have been shown to have similar functions in pre-B cell receptor-mediated development of early B cells (22). Equally possible, other PLCγ2-independent signaling pathway may be able to support differentiation of PLCγ2-/- osteoclasts in vivo. PLCγ1 deficiency results in early embryonic lethality (71), and thus, conditional deletion of PLCγ1 in BMMs will help to clarify this issue. Because both PLCγ1 and PLCγ2 produce same secondary messages diacylglycerol and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate upon activation, it is a bit surprising to observe that overexpression of PLCγ1 fails to restore the ability of PLCγ2-/- BMMs to differentiate to osteoclasts in vitro. A previous study has demonstrated that overexpression of PLCγ1 also fails to restore B cell receptor-mediated functions in PLCγ2-/- late B cells (22). PLCγ2 is very likely to have a unique role in RANKL-mediated biological function, including lympho-node organogenesis, even if PLCγ1 might participate in RANKL signaling.

PLCγ2 activates multiple pathways, including PKC-dependent, Ca2+-dependent, and MAPK-dependent pathways (1, 2). Deficiency of NF-κB, whose activation is PKC-dependent, impairs RANKL-mediated function (46). Lack of NFATc1, a Ca2+ pathway-dependent transcription, also interferes with RANKL-mediated biological function (42). However, the expression level of NFATc1 is very low in naïve BMMs. RANKL stimulation results in the activation of NFATc1, which turns on its own gene and results in the elevation of its own protein expression (42). In contrast, the expression level of NF-κBis high in naïve BMMs, and NF-κB is quickly activated upon RANKL stimulation. In addition, the JNK/AP-1 pathway is essential for RANKL-mediated osteoclast development (47). The multiple pathways, which are regulated by PLCγ2, are required for RANKL-mediated biological functions. Cross-talk among these signaling pathways in regulation RANKL-mediated biological functions likely exists. Indeed, studies have shown that NFATc1 cooperates with the AP-1 component c-Fos to promote expression of osteoclast-specific genes TRAP, cathepsin K, and CTR (42, 72, 73).

Organogenesis of lymph node or other secondary lymphoid organs, such as spleen and Peyer's patch, is highly regulated by chemokines and cytokines (74, 75). For instance, the chemokine CXCL13 is required for secondary lymphoid organ development and deficiency of CXCL13, or its receptor CXCR5 severely impairs development of lymph node and Peyer's patch and organization of splenic microarchitecture (76, 77). The tumor necrosis factor family of cytokines, such as lymphotoxin (LT)α and LTβ, are also essential for secondary lymphoid organ development, and mice deficient in LTα or LTβ lack lymph node and Peyer's patch and have disorganized splenic microarchitecture (55, 56, 78, 79). Activation of transcription factor NF-κB seems to be a common pathway that controls organogenesis of lymph nodes, spleens, and Peyer's patches. Mice deficient in IκB kinase α or NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK), important kinases in NF-κB activation, have severe defects in lymph nodes and Peyer's patches (80, 81). However, organogenesis of lymph node also has its distinct requirement. For example, mice deficient in RANKL or and its receptor RANK lack lymph nodes but have normal Peyer's patches and organization of splenic microarchitecture (32, 82). Interestingly, our current study has found that PLCγ2 plays an essential role in RANKL/RANK signaling, and its deficiency specifically blocks organogenesis of lymph node but not Peyer's patch or spleen. Of note, LT-induced up-regulation of VCAM (vascular cell adhesion molecule), a NF-κB-dependent event (83), is normal in the absence of PLCγ2 (data not shown). Thus, RANKL/RANK mediates lymph node organogenesis through signaling molecule PLCγ2, whereas LTα/LTβ does not depend on PLCγ2 in regulating organogenesis of peripheral lymphoid organs.

Acknowledgments

We thank the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Center for Metabolic Bone Disease Histomorphometry and Molecular Analyses Core Laboratory and the Small Animal Pheno-typing Core, National Institutes of Health Grant P30-AR46031 (to J. M. M.).

*

This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants AR055339 (to Yabing Chen), AR046031-080003 (to H. W.), AI52327 (to R. W.), and HL073284 and AI079087 (to D. W.). This work was also supported by a University of Alabama at Birmingham Center for Metabolic Bone Disease pilot project award (to Yabing Chen), a Scholar Award from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, and a grant from Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin endowment fund (to D. W.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

3

The abbreviations used are: PKC, protein kinase C; JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PLC, phospholipase C; BMM, RANKL, receptor activator of NF-κB ligand; IRES, internal ribosome entry site; BMM, bone marrow (BM)-derived monocyte/macrophage; M-CSF, macrophage-colony stimulating factor; α-MEM, α-minimal essential medium; RT, reverse transcription; GFP, green fluorescent protein; LT, lymphotoxin; TRAP, tartrate resistant acid phosphatase; CTR, calcitonin receptor; CATH K, cathepsin K.

References

  • 1.Rhee, S. G., and Bae, Y. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272 15045-15048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rhee, S. G., and Choi, K. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267 12393-12396 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lin, X., and Wang, D. (2004) Semin. Immunol. 16 429-435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thome, M. (2004) Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4 348-359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Karin, M., and Ben-Neriah, Y. (2000) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18 621-663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ghosh, S., May, M. J., and Kopp, E. B. (1998) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16 225-260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Baldwin, A. S., Jr. (1996) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14 649-683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rao, A., Luo, C., and Hogan, P. G. (1997) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15 707-747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chao, T. S., Foster, D. A., Rapp, U. R., and Rosner, M. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269 7337-7341 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hirasawa, N., Santini, F., and Beaven, M. A. (1995) J. Immunol. 154 5391-5402 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roa, M., Paumet, F., Le Mao, J., David, B., and Blank, U. (1997) J. Immunol. 159 2815-2823 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jiang, A., Craxton, A., Kurosaki, T., and Clark, E. A. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 188 1297-1306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hashimoto, A., Okada, H., Jiang, A., Kurosaki, M., Greenberg, S., Clark, E. A., and Kurosaki, T. (1998) J. Exp. Med. 188 1287-1295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang, C., Hirasawa, N., and Beaven, M. A. (1997) J. Immunol. 158 4968-4975 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kawakami, Y., Hartman, S. E., Holland, P. M., Cooper, J. A., and Kawakami, T. (1998) J. Immunol. 161 1795-1802 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Campbell, K. S. (1999) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11 256-264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Derijard, B., Hibi, M., Wu, I. H., Barrett, T., Su, B., Deng, T., Karin, M., and Davis, R. J. (1994) Cell 76 1025-1037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hibi, M., Lin, A., Smeal, T., Minden, A., and Karin, M. (1993) Genes Dev. 7 2135-2148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kyriakis, J. M., Banerjee, P., Nikolakaki, E., Dai, T., Rubie, E. A., Ahmad, M. F., Avruch, J., and Woodgett, J. R. (1994) Nature 369 156-160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang, D., Feng, J., Wen, R., Marine, J. C., Sangster, M. Y., Parganas, E., Hoffmeyer, A., Jackson, C. W., Cleveland, J. L., Murray, P. J., and Ihle, J. N. (2000) Immunity 13 25-35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hashimoto, A., Takeda, K., Inaba, M., Sekimata, M., Kaisho, T., Ikehara, S., Homma, Y., Akira, S., and Kurosaki, T. (2000) J. Immunol. 165 1738-1742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wen, R., Chen, Y., Schuman, J., Fu, G., Yang, S., Zhang, W., Newman, D. K., and Wang, D. (2004) EMBO J. 23 4007-4017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wen, R., Chen, Y., Xue, L., Schuman, J., Yang, S., Morris, S. W., and Wang, D. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278 43654-43662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wen, R., Jou, S.-T., Chen, Y., Hoffmeyer, A., and Wang, D. (2002) J. Immunol. 169 6743-6752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Leibson, P. J. (1997) Immunity 6 655-661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Colucci, F., Di Santo, J. P., and Leibson, P. J. (2002) Nat. Immunol. 3 807-813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tassi, I., Presti, R., Kim, S., Yokoyama, W. M., Gilfillan, S., and Colonna, M. (2005) J. Immunol. 175 749-754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Regunathan, J., Chen, Y., Kutlesa, S., Dai, X., Bai, L., Wen, R., Wang, D., and Malarkannan, S. (2006) J. Immunol. 177 5365-5376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lacey, D. L., Timms, E., Tan, H. L., Kelley, M. J., Dunstan, C. R., Burgess, T., Elliott, R., Colombero, A., Elliott, G., Scully, S., Hsu, H., Sullivan, J., Hawkins, N., Davy, E., Capparelli, C., Eli, A., Qian, Y. X., Kaufman, S., Sarosi, I., Shalhoub, V., Senaldi, G., Guo, J., Delaney, J., and Boyle, W. J. (1998) Cell 93 165-176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yasuda, H., Shima, N., Nakagawa, N., Yamaguchi, K., Kinosaki, M., Mochizuki, S., Tomoyasu, A., Yano, K., Goto, M., Murakami, A., Tsuda, E., Morinaga, T., Higashio, K., Udagawa, N., Takahashi, N., and Suda, T. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95 3597-3602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Anderson, D. M., Maraskovsky, E., Billingsley, W. L., Dougall, W. C., Tometsko, M. E., Roux, E. R., Teepe, M. C., DuBose, R. F., Cosman, D., and Galibert, L. (1997) Nature 390 175-179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kong, Y. Y., Yoshida, H., Sarosi, I., Tan, H. L., Timms, E., Capparelli, C., Morony, S., Oliveira-dos-Santos, A. J., Van, G., Itie, A., Khoo, W., Wakeham, A., Dunstan, C. R., Lacey, D. L., Mak, T. W., Boyle, W. J., and Penninger, J. M. (1999) Nature 397 315-323 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yoshida, H., Hayashi, S., Kunisada, T., Ogawa, M., Nishikawa, S., Okamura, H., Sudo, T., Shultz, L. D., and Nishikawa, S. (1990) Nature 345 442-444 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kaifu, T., Nakahara, J., Inui, M., Mishima, K., Momiyama, T., Kaji, M., Sugahara, A., Koito, H., Ujike-Asai, A., Nakamura, A., Kanazawa, K., Tan-Takeuchi, K., Iwasaki, K., Yokoyama, W. M., Kudo, A., Fujiwara, M., Asou, H., and Takai, T. (2003) J. Clin. Investig. 111 323-332 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Koga, T., Inui, M., Inoue, K., Kim, S., Suematsu, A., Kobayashi, E., Iwata, T., Ohnishi, H., Matozaki, T., Kodama, T., Taniguchi, T., Takayanagi, H., and Takai, T. (2004) Nature 428 758-763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mocsai, A., Humphrey, M. B., Van Ziffle, J. A., Hu, Y., Burghardt, A., Spusta, S. C., Majumdar, S., Lanier, L. L., Lowell, C. A., and Nakamura, M. C. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 6158-6163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lomaga, M. A., Yeh, W. C., Sarosi, I., Duncan, G. S., Furlonger, C., Ho, A., Morony, S., Capparelli, C., Van, G., Kaufman, S., van der Heiden, A., Itie, A., Wakeham, A., Khoo, W., Sasaki, T., Cao, Z., Penninger, J. M., Paige, C. J., Lacey, D. L., Dunstan, C. R., Boyle, W. J., Goeddel, D. V., and Mak, T. W. (1999) Genes Dev. 13 1015-1024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wong, B. R., Josien, R., Lee, S. Y., Vologodskaia, M., Steinman, R. M., and Choi, Y. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273 28355-28359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lee, S. E., Woo, K. M., Kim, S. Y., Kim, H. M., Kwack, K., Lee, Z. H., and Kim, H. H. (2002) Bone (NY) 30 71-77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li, X., Udagawa, N., Itoh, K., Suda, K., Murase, Y., Nishihara, T., Suda, T., and Takahashi, N. (2002) Endocrinology 143 3105-3113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.David, J. P., Sabapathy, K., Hoffmann, O., Idarraga, M. H., and Wagner, E. F. (2002) J. Cell Sci. 115 4317-4325 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Takayanagi, H., Kim, S., Koga, T., Nishina, H., Isshiki, M., Yoshida, H., Saiura, A., Isobe, M., Yokochi, T., Inoue, J., Wagner, E. F., Mak, T. W., Kodama, T., and Taniguchi, T. (2002) Dev. Cell 3 889-901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Abu-Amer, Y. (2001) J. Clin. Investig. 107 1375-1385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wei, S., Teitelbaum, S. L., Wang, M. W., and Ross, F. P. (2001) Endocrinology 142 1290-1295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Matsuo, K., Owens, J. M., Tonko, M., Elliott, C., Chambers, T. J., and Wagner, E. F. (2000) Nat. Genet. 24 184-187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Franzoso, G., Carlson, L., Xing, L., Poljak, L., Shores, E. W., Brown, K. D., Leonardi, A., Tran, T., Boyce, B. F., and Siebenlist, U. (1997) Genes Dev. 11 3482-3496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Grigoriadis, A. E., Wang, Z. Q., Cecchini, M. G., Hofstetter, W., Felix, R., Fleisch, H. A., and Wagner, E. F. (1994) Science 266 443-448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.McHugh, K. P., Hodivala-Dilke, K., Zheng, M. H., Namba, N., Lam, J., Novack, D., Feng, X., Ross, F. P., Hynes, R. O., and Teitelbaum, S. L. (2000) J. Clin. Investig. 105 433-440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Feng, X., Novack, D. V., Faccio, R., Ory, D. S., Aya, K., Boyer, M. I., McHugh, K. P., Ross, F. P., and Teitelbaum, S. L. (2001) J. Clin. Investig. 107 1137-1144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Feng, X., Takeshita, S., Namba, N., Wei, S., Teitelbaum, S. L., and Ross, F. P. (2002) Endocrinology 143 4868-4874 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Humphrey, M. B., Ogasawara, K., Yao, W., Spusta, S. C., Daws, M. R., Lane, N. E., Lanier, L. L., and Nakamura, M. C. (2004) J. Bone Miner. Res. 19 224-234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chen, Y., Wen, R., Yang, S., Schuman, J., Zhang, E. E., Yi, T., Feng, G. S., and Wang, D. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278 16520-16527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Parfitt, A. M., Drezner, M. K., Glorieux, F. H., Kanis, J. A., Malluche, H., Meunier, P. J., Ott, S. M., and Recker, R. R. (1987) J. Bone Miner Res. 2 595-610 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chen, Y., Kelm, R. J., Jr., Budd, R. C., Sobel, B. E., and Schneider, D. J. (2004) J. Cell. Biochem. 92 178-188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.De Togni, P., Goellner, J., Ruddle, N. H., Streeter, P. R., Fick, A., Mariathasan, S., Smith, S. C., Carlson, R., Shornick, L. P., Strauss-Schoenberger, J., Russel, J. H., Karr, R., and Chaplin, D. D. (1994) Science 264 703-707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Alimzhanov, M. B., Kuprash, D. V., Kosco-Vilbois, M. H., Luz, A., Turetskaya, R. L., Tarakhovsky, A., Rajewsky, K., Nedospasov, S. A., and Pfeffer, K. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 9302-9307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Matsumoto, M., Mariathasan, S., Nahm, M. H., Baranyay, F., Peschon, J. J., and Chaplin, D. D. (1996) Science 271 1289-1291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Pasparakis, M., Alexopoulou, L., Episkopou, V., and Kollias, G. (1996) J. Exp. Med. 184 1397-1411 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nishibe, S., Wahl, M. I., Hernandez-Sotomayor, S. M., Tonks, N. K., Rhee, S. G., and Carpenter, G. (1990) Science 250 1253-1256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Weiss, A., Koretzky, G., Schatzman, R. C., and Kadlecek, T. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88 5484-5488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Watanabe, D., Hashimoto, S., Ishiai, M., Matsushita, M., Baba, Y., Kishimoto, T., Kurosaki, T., and Tsukada, S. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276 38595-38601 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rodriguez, R., Matsuda, M., Perisic, O., Bravo, J., Paul, A., Jones, N. P., Light, Y., Swann, K., Williams, R. L., and Katan, M. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276 47982-47992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Boulton, T. G., Nye, S. H., Robbins, D. J., Ip, N. Y., Radziejewska, E., Morgenbesser, S. D., DePinho, R. A., Panayotatos, N., Cobb, M. H., and Yancopoulos, G. D. (1991) Cell 65 663-675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Crews, C. M., Alessandrini, A., and Erikson, R. L. (1992) Science 258 478-480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Salvador, J. M., Mittelstadt, P. R., Guszczynski, T., Copeland, T. D., Yamaguchi, H., Appella, E., Fornace, A. J., Jr., and Ashwell, J. D. (2005) Nat. Immunol. 6 390-395 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Akagi, T., Shishido, T., Murata, K., and Hanafusa, H. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97 7290-7295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nagy, T. R., and Clair, A. L. (2000) Obes. Res. 8 392-398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bunting, K. D., Sangster, M. Y., Ihle, J. N., and Sorrentino, B. P. (1998) Nat. Med. 4 58-64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Wen, R., Wang, D., McKay, C., Bunting, K. D., Marine, J. C., Vanin, E. F., Zambetti, G. P., Korsmeyer, S. J., Ihle, J. N., and Cleveland, J. L. (2001) Mol. Cell. Biol. 21 678-689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Mao, D., Epple, H., Uthgenannt, B., Novack, D. V., and Faccio, R. (2006) J. Clin. Investig. 116 2869-2879 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Ji, Q. S., Winnier, G. E., Niswender, K. D., Horstman, D., Wisdom, R., Magnuson, M. A., and Carpenter, G. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94 2999-3003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Matsuo, K., Galson, D. L., Zhao, C., Peng, L., Laplace, C., Wang, K. Z., Bachler, M. A., Amano, H., Aburatani, H., Ishikawa, H., and Wagner, E. F. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279 26475-26480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Matsumoto, M., Kogawa, M., Wada, S., Takayanagi, H., Tsujimoto, M., Katayama, S., Hisatake, K., and Nogi, Y. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279 45969-45979 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Muller, G., and Lipp, M. (2003) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 15 217-224 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Drayton, D. L., Liao, S., Mounzer, R. H., and Ruddle, N. H. (2006) Nat. Immunol. 7 344-353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Forster, R., Mattis, A. E., Kremmer, E., Wolf, E., Brem, G., and Lipp, M. (1996) Cell 87 1037-1047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ansel, K. M., Ngo, V. N., Hyman, P. L., Luther, S. A., Forster, R., Sedgwick, J. D., Browning, J. L., Lipp, M., and Cyster, J. G. (2000) Nature 406 309-314 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Banks, T. A., Rouse, B. T., Kerley, M. K., Blair, P. J., Godfrey, V. L., Kuklin, N. A., Bouley, D. M., Thomas, J., Kanangat, S., and Mucenski, M. L. (1995) J. Immunol. 155 1685-1693 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Koni, P. A., Sacca, R., Lawton, P., Browning, J. L., Ruddle, N. H., and Flavell, R. A. (1997) Immunity 6 491-500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Matsushima, A., Kaisho, T., Rennert, P. D., Nakano, H., Kurosawa, K., Uchida, D., Takeda, K., Akira, S., and Matsumoto, M. (2001) J. Exp. Med. 193 631-636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Miyawaki, S., Nakamura, Y., Suzuka, H., Koba, M., Yasumizu, R., Ikehara, S., and Shibata, Y. (1994) Eur. J. Immunol. 24 429-434 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Dougall, W. C., Glaccum, M., Charrier, K., Rohrbach, K., Brasel, K., De Smedt, T., Daro, E., Smith, J., Tometsko, M. E., Maliszewski, C. R., Arm-strong, A., Shen, V., Bain, S., Cosman, D., Anderson, D., Morrissey, P. J., Peschon, J. J., and Schuh, J. (1999) Genes Dev. 13 2412-2424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Dejardin, E., Droin, N. M., Delhase, M., Haas, E., Cao, Y., Makris, C., Li, Z. W., Karin, M., Ware, C. F., and Green, D. R. (2002) Immunity 17 525-535 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES