Skip to main content
Journal of the National Medical Association logoLink to Journal of the National Medical Association
letter
. 1985 Dec;77(12):979–984.

Relative Afferent Pupillary Defects in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma—Five Years' Experience

Carlos J Page, John C Merritt, Bertha Evans
PMCID: PMC2571246  PMID: 4078926

Abstract

Afferent pupillary defects may accompany asymmetric primary open-angle glaucoma, though the exact incidence has not been reported. Charts were reviewed on 89 patients attending the Glaucoma/Uveitis Clinic at the North Carolina Memorial Hospital in Chapel Hill, North Carolina over a five-year period. All patients had primary open-angle glaucoma diagnosed by: (1) increased ocular tensions (22 mmHg) in the presence of open-anterior-chamber angles and (2) optic-nerve cupping and atrophy compatible with (3) pressure-dependent, visual-field loss. No subjects with secondary glaucomas, primary-angle-closure glaucoma, or ocular hypertension are included.

The presence of the relative afferent pupillary defect was noted in 21 of 89 patients (23 percent). Sixteen of 70 black patients had relative afferent pupillary defect in the more severely affected eye, while five of 19 white patients demonstrated afferent pupils. Other demographic characteristics of this population are described. Two typical primary-open-angle glaucoma patients are discussed to demonstrate comparable changes within the optic nerves and Goldmann visual fields. The presence of the relative afferent pupillary defect best correlates with asymmetric, visual-field loss in the more severely affected eye.

Full text

PDF
979

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Kaback M. B., Burde R. M., Becker B. Relative afferent pupillary defect in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976 Apr;81(4):462–468. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(76)90302-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kohn A. N., Moss A. P., Podos S. M. Relative afferent pupillary defects in glaucoma without characteristic field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979 Feb;97(2):294–296. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1979.01020010146010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. LOWENSTEIN O. Clinical pupillary symptoms in lesions of the optic nerve, optic chiasm, and optic tract. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1954 Sep;52(3):385–403. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1954.00920050387006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McCrary J. A., 3rd Pupil in clinical diagnosis. Light reflex anatomy and the afferent pupil defect. Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1977 Sep-Oct;83(5):820–826. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Prywes A. S. Unilateral afferent pupillary defects in asymmetric glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1976 Aug;94(8):1286–1288. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1976.03910040158006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Thompson H. S. Afferent pupillary defects. Pupillary findings associated with defects of the afferent arm of the pupillary light reflex arc. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966 Nov;62(5):860–873. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thompson H. S., Montague P., Cox T. A., Corbett J. J. The relationship between visual acuity, pupillary defect, and visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982 Jun;93(6):681–688. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(82)90460-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the National Medical Association are provided here courtesy of National Medical Association

RESOURCES