Skip to main content
Journal of the National Medical Association logoLink to Journal of the National Medical Association
. 1991 Nov;83(11):969–974.

Mediastinal masses: magnetic resonance imaging in comparison with computed tomography.

P Batra 1, K Brown 1, J D Collins 1, E C Holmes 1, R J Steckel 1, B J Shapiro 1
PMCID: PMC2571609  PMID: 1766020

Abstract

Seventy-eight patients with mediastinal abnormalities were imaged with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate mediastinal masses and associated lung, pleural, or chest wall disease. Magnetic resonance images were compared with computed tomography (CT) scans, which were available in 45 patients. While MRI and CT were equally effective in demonstrating mediastinal lesions, CT was superior for displaying calcification within a mass in eight patients and for demonstrating associated lung abnormality in four patients. Computed tomography should remain the imaging procedure of choice after chest radiography to evaluate mediastinal masses, although MRI may be indicated in selected patients.

Full text

PDF
969

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cohen A. M., Creviston S., LiPuma J. P., Bryan P. J., Lieberman J., Haaga J. R., Alfidi R. J. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the mediastinum and hili: early impressions of its efficacy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983 Dec;141(6):1163–1169. doi: 10.2214/ajr.141.6.1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Epstein D. M., Kressel H., Gefter W., Axel L., Thickman D., Aronchick J., Miller W. MR imaging of the mediastinum: a retrospective comparison with computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1984 Aug;8(4):670–676. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198408000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gamsu G., Stark D. D., Webb W. R., Moore E. H., Sheldon P. E. Magnetic resonance imaging of benign mediastinal masses. Radiology. 1984 Jun;151(3):709–713. doi: 10.1148/radiology.151.3.6718731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Glazer H. S., Levitt R. G., Lee J. K., Emami B., Gronemeyer S., Murphy W. A. Differentiation of radiation fibrosis from recurrent pulmonary neoplasm by magnetic resonance imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1984 Oct;143(4):729–730. doi: 10.2214/ajr.143.4.729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Levitt R. G., Glazer H. S., Roper C. L., Lee J. K., Murphy W. A. Magnetic resonance imaging of mediastinal and hilar masses: comparison with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Jul;145(1):9–14. doi: 10.2214/ajr.145.1.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Müller N. L., Gamsu G., Webb W. R. Pulmonary nodules: detection using magnetic resonance and computed tomography. Radiology. 1985 Jun;155(3):687–690. doi: 10.1148/radiology.155.3.4001370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Siegel M. J., Nadel S. N., Glazer H. S., Sagel S. S. Mediastinal lesions in children: comparison of CT and MR. Radiology. 1986 Jul;160(1):241–244. doi: 10.1148/radiology.160.1.3715038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. von Schulthess G. K., McMurdo K., Tscholakoff D., de Geer G., Gamsu G., Higgins C. B. Mediastinal masses: MR imaging. Radiology. 1986 Feb;158(2):289–296. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.2.3941855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the National Medical Association are provided here courtesy of National Medical Association

RESOURCES