Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the National Medical Association logoLink to Journal of the National Medical Association
. 2007 Jul;99(7):764–771.

Women on professional society and journal editorial boards.

Melinda J Morton 1, Seema S Sonnad 1
PMCID: PMC2574346  PMID: 17668642

Abstract

PURPOSE: Membership on a professional medical society or journal editorial board is a marker of influence and prestige for those in academic medicine. This study presents the first comprehensive quantification of women on these boards and the implications for women in medicine. METHODS: The numbers of women and men on professional society and journal editorial boards across 28 specialties (March 2004) were counted. The number of women holding multiple roles on these boards and the number of women holding top leadership positions on these boards were counted, and these proportions were compared. RESULTS: Three-thousand-four-hundred-seventy-three individuals on 39 professional medical society boards and 54 journal editorial boards were included. Eighty-three percent (2,884) of board members were male. Men occupied > 80% of top leadership positions on these boards. Thirty-five of the 589 women in the study held multiple roles. Anesthesiology (p < 0.0025), pediatrics (p < 0.0001), dermatology (p = 0.0001), obstetrics/ gynecology (p = 0.05), medical genetics (p < 0.015) and rehabilitation medicine (p < 0.03) had significantly lower proportions of women on boards in comparison to the total women in the specialty. Internal medicine, plastic surgery, cardiology and general surgery had nearly equivalent proportions; in otolaryngology and family medicine, female board members slightly exceeded the proportion of women in the field. CONCLUSION: Women's representation on society and editorial boards does not always reflect their presence in medical specialties, and it is critically lacking in certain specialties. Efforts should be made to attain parity of women leaders on these boards. Further efforts should be made to eliminate barriers to women's leadership in medicine.

Full text

PDF
764

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ash Arlene S., Carr Phyllis L., Goldstein Richard, Friedman Robert H. Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: is there equity? Ann Intern Med. 2004 Aug 3;141(3):205–212. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-3-200408030-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benedek E. P. Editorial practices of psychiatric and related journals: implications for women. Am J Psychiatry. 1976 Jan;133(1):89–92. doi: 10.1176/ajp.133.1.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bickel Janet, Wara Diane, Atkinson Barbara F., Cohen Lawrence S., Dunn Michael, Hostler Sharon, Johnson Timothy R. B., Morahan Page, Rubenstein Arthur H., Sheldon George F. Increasing women's leadership in academic medicine: report of the AAMC Project Implementation Committee. Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10):1043–1061. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200210000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buerk Minerva Smith, Kanof Naomi Marilyn, Bergfeld Wilma Fowler, Hood Antoinette Foote. Women leaders in American dermatology. Interview by Marylou C. Thelmo, E. Dorinda Shelley, Gloria F. Graham. Skinmed. 2004 Mar-Apr;3(2):77–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-9740.2004.03287.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dickersin K., Fredman L., Flegal K. M., Scott J. D., Crawley B. Is there a sex bias in choosing editors? Epidemiology journals as an example. JAMA. 1998 Jul 15;280(3):260–264. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.3.260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grandis Jennifer Rubin, Gooding William E., Zamboni Beth A., Wagener Marilyn M., Drenning Stephanie D., Miller Lori, Doyle Karen Jo, Mackinnon Susan E., Wagner Robin L. The gender gap in a surgical subspecialty: analysis of career and lifestyle factors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Jun;130(6):695–702. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.6.695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Guelich Jill M., Singer Burton H., Castro Marcia C., Rosenberg Leon E. A gender gap in the next generation of physician-scientists: medical student interest and participation in research. J Investig Med. 2002 Nov;50(6):412–418. doi: 10.1136/jim-50-06-01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haak Laurel L. Women in neuroscience (WIN): the first twenty years. J Hist Neurosci. 2002 Mar;11(1):70–79. doi: 10.1076/jhin.11.1.70.9111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jonasson Olga. Leaders in American surgery: where are the women? Surgery. 2002 Jun;131(6):672–675. doi: 10.1067/msy.2002.124880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Keiser Jennifer, Utzinger Jürg, Singer Burton H. Gender composition of editorial boards of general medical journals. Lancet. 2003 Oct 18;362(9392):1336–1336. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14607-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kennedy B. L., Lin Y., Dickstein L. J. Women on the editorial boards of major journals. Acad Med. 2001 Aug;76(8):849–851. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200108000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nonnemaker L. Women physicians in academic medicine: new insights from cohort studies. N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 10;342(6):399–405. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200002103420606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sambunjak Dario, Straus Sharon E., Marusić Ana. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006 Sep 6;296(9):1103–1115. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.9.1103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sonnad Seema S., Colletti Lisa M. Issues in the recruitment and success of women in academic surgery. Surgery. 2002 Aug;132(2):415–419. doi: 10.1067/msy.2002.127694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the National Medical Association are provided here courtesy of National Medical Association

RESOURCES