Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2008 Aug 7;105(33):12045–12050. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802354105

Cox-dependent fatty acid metabolites cause pain through activation of the irritant receptor TRPA1

Serena Materazzi *, Romina Nassini *, Eunice Andrè , Barbara Campi , Silvia Amadesi , Marcello Trevisani , Nigel W Bunnett , Riccardo Patacchini §, Pierangelo Geppetti *,†,
PMCID: PMC2575298  PMID: 18687886

Abstract

Prostaglandins (PG) are known to induce pain perception indirectly by sensitizing nociceptors. Accordingly, the analgesic action of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) results from inhibition of cyclooxygenases and blockade of PG biosynthesis. Cyclopentenone PGs, 15-d-PGJ2, PGA2, and PGA1, formed by dehydration of their respective parent PGs, PGD2, PGE2, and PGE1, possess a highly reactive α,β-unsaturated carbonyl group that has been proposed to gate the irritant transient receptor potential A1 (TRPA1) channel. Here, by using TRPA1 wild-type (TRPA1+/+) or deficient (TRPA1−/−) mice, we show that cyclopentenone PGs produce pain by direct stimulation of nociceptors via TRPA1 activation. Cyclopentenone PGs caused a robust calcium response in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons of TRPA1+/+, but not of TRPA1−/− mice, and a calcium-dependent release of sensory neuropeptides from the rat dorsal spinal cord. Intraplantar injection of cyclopentenone PGs stimulated c-fos expression in spinal neurons of the dorsal horn and evoked an instantaneous, robust, and transient nociceptive response in TRPA1+/+ but not in TRPA1−/− mice. The classical proalgesic PG, PGE2, caused a slight calcium response in DRG neurons, increased c-fos expression in spinal neurons, and induced a delayed and sustained nociceptive response in both TRPA1+/+ and TRPA1−/− mice. These results expand the mechanism of NSAID analgesia from blockade of indirect nociceptor sensitization by classical PGs to inhibition of direct TRPA1-dependent nociceptor activation by cyclopentenone PGs. Thus, TRPA1 antagonism may contribute to suppress pain evoked by PG metabolites without the adverse effects of inhibiting cyclooxygenases.

Keywords: cyclopentenone isoprostane, cyclopentenone prostaglandins


Prostanoids are a group of bioactive compounds that include prostaglandins (PGD2, PGE2, PGF), prostacyclin (PGI2), and thromboxane A2. They originate from arachidonic acid, which is released intracellularly from plasma membrane phospholipids upon tissue damage and inflammation. Constitutively expressed cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and inducible COX-2 convert arachidonic acid to the precursors PGG2 and PGH2, from which all prostanoids are generated by tissue-specific synthases. The C20 polyunsaturated fatty acid, dihomo-γ-linolenic acid, is also a substrate of COX for eicosanoid production, from which prostaglandins of the 1-series, including PGE1, derive (1). Inhibition of COX activity is the main mechanism of action of aspirin and related nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as discovered by the pioneering work of Vane and colleagues (2). At least eight G protein-coupled receptor subtypes for prostanoids have been identified, which differ in tissue distribution, signal transduction pathways, and sensitivity to the various agonists (3, 4).

Pain relief, by far, is the most frequent therapeutic indication of COX inhibitors, and the contribution of prostanoids and their receptors to pain has been an area of intense investigation (5, 6). PGs do not directly excite primary sensory neurons but rather indirectly sensitize the peripheral terminals of nociceptors, with PGE2 and PGI2 inducing a robust sensitization by activating EP1–4 and IP receptors, respectively (79). Accordingly, the analgesic property of NSAIDs and selective COX-2 inhibitors (Coxibs) has been assigned to their ability to suppress nociceptor sensitization by COX metabolites (79).

Transient receptor potential A1 (TRPA1) is a recently identified excitatory ion channel (10, 11) that is coexpressed with the “capsaicin receptor” TRPV1 by a subpopulation of primary afferent neurons containing substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which mediate pain and neurogenic inflammation (1215). Agonists of TRPA1 include the pungent ingredients of various spices, including mustard, garlic, and cinnamon (11, 16), environmental irritants such as acrolein (14), formaldehyde (17), and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE), an endogenous α,β-unsaturated aldehyde generated in response to oxidative stress after inflammation and tissue injury (18, 19).

Cyclopentenone prostaglandins, including PGA2, PGA1, and PGJ2, are PG metabolites formed by dehydration within the cyclopentane ring of PGE2, PGE1, and PGD2, respectively. The biological actions of cyclopentenone PGs are not mediated by activation of the classical G protein-coupled prostanoid receptors, but rather through interaction with other target proteins (20). For example, 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-PGJ2 (15-d-PGJ2), a PGJ2 metabolite, is a potent natural activator of the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-γ (20). Cyclopentenone PGs are characterized by the presence of a highly reactive α,β-unsaturated carbonyl group within their cyclopentenone ring, a moiety that confers the ability to adduct thiol-containing compounds, via Michael addition (20), and through this mechanism they have been proposed to stimulate TRPA1 (21).

We hypothesized that cyclopentenone PGs stimulate TRPA1 and thereby directly activate nociceptors to cause pain, in contrast to the classical PGs that indirectly sensitize nociceptors. We have obtained genetic evidence that cyclopentenone PGs excite nociceptors, release sensory neuropeptides, activate spinal nociceptive neurons, and induce acute pain by a mechanism that is completely and exclusively dependent on TRPA1. Cyclopentenone PGs may represent a new class of COX-dependent algesic agents, and their novel mechanism of action adds a new dimension to our understanding of the mechanisms of the analgesic effect of NSAIDs and Coxibs.

Results

Cyclopentenone PGs Activate TRPA1 in Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) Neurons.

To assess whether cyclopentenone PGs directly excite DRG neurons by a TRPA1-dependent mechanism, we tested the ability of 15-d-PGJ2, PGA2, and PGA1 to mobilize intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) in DRG neurons from Swiss mice and from TRPA1 wild-type (TRPA1+/+) and deficient (TRPA1−/−) mice. We also evaluated the effects of the isoprostane, 8-iso-PGA2, which can also stimulate TRPA1 (21). Isoprostanes are PG-like substances whose generation does not require COX activation (22). A cyclopentenone isoprostane isomer of PGA2, 8-iso-PGA2, like cyclopentenone PGs, is produced by dehydration of E-isoprostane within the cyclopentane ring. It (8-iso-PGA2) contains an electrophilic α,β-unsaturated carbonyl moiety that rapidly adducts cellular thiols by Michael addition (23).

15-d-PGJ2, PGA2, PGA1, and 8-iso-PGA2 evoked a concentration-dependent increase in [Ca2+]i in DRG neurons of Swiss mice. EC50s (confidence interval, C.I.) were 8.9 (7.3–10.7); 24.0 (20.4–27.9); 15.1 (9.4–24.2); 22.4 (10.8–46.7) μM, respectively (Fig. 1A). All neurons activated by cyclopentenone PGs or 8-iso-PGA2 also responded to capsaicin, while ≈40% of the capsaicin-sensitive neurons (n = 437) responded to the various cyclopentenone PGs or isoprostane. These findings are consistent with the report that cyclopentenone PGs and isoprostane excite nociceptive, capsaicin-sensitive trigeminal neurons of C57BL6 mice (21).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Cyclopentenone PGs and isoprostane increase [Ca2+]i in mouse DRG neurons. (A) Concentration-response curves of cyclopentenone PGs or isoprostane and PGE2 in DRG neurons of Swiss mice (n = 521 neurons). (B) Representative traces of [Ca2+]i evoked by 15-d-PGJ2 (30 μM) or PGE2 (30 μM), followed by capsaicin (CPS, 1 μM) and potassium (KCl, 50 mM). A calcium response was induced by 15-d-PGJ2 in DRG neurons from TRPA1+/+ but not from TRPA1−/− mice. PGE2, capsaicin or potassium evoked a similar response in neurons from TRPA1+/+ or TRPA1−/− mice. (C) Pooled data of [Ca2+]i evoked by cinnamaldehyde (CNM, 30 μM), capsaicin (1 μM), 15-d-PGJ2, PGA1, PGA2, 8-iso-PGA2, PGD2, and PGE2 (all 30 μM) in DRG neurons from TRPA1+/+ (gray or orange columns) or TRPA1−/− (filled or red columns) mice. Among CPS-sensitive neurons from wild-type animals, a subpopulation of CNM-responsive cells was observed. In DRG neurons from TRPA1-deficient mice CNM, 15-d-PGJ2, PGA1, PGA2, or 8-iso-PGA2 did not cause any response. PGE2 evoked a small response in DRG neurons from TRPA1+/+ or TRPA1−/− mice. PGD2 failed to cause any response. The robust response evoked by capsaicin was similar in neurons from TRPA1+/+ and TRPA1−/− mice. Each column represents the mean ± SEM of n ≥ 23 cells; *, P < 0.01 compared with TRPA1−/− DRG neurons.

In DRG neurons from TRPA1+/+ mice (C57 background), 15-d-PGJ2, PGA2, PGA1, and 8-iso-PGA2 (all 30 μM) increased [Ca2+]i, comparable to responses of neurons from Swiss mice (Fig. 1 B and C). The ratio between the number of neurons responding to cyclopentenone compounds and neurons responding to capsaicin was: PGA2 (23/47, 49%), PGA1 (28/72, 38%), 15-d-PGJ2 (36/76, 53%), and 8-iso-PGA2 (19/43, 44%). These percentages are entirely consistent with the report that TRPA1-expressing, mustard oil-responsive neurons represent a subset (≈50%) of TRPV1-expressing, capsaicin-responsive DRG neurons (16, 24). In contrast, neurons from TRPA1−/− mice were almost completely unresponsive to 15-d-PGJ2, PGA2, PGA1, and 8-iso-PGA2 (Fig. 1 B and C), and the ratio between the number of neurons responding to cyclopentenone compounds (30 μM) and neurons responding to capsaicin was: PGA2 (2/34, 5%), PGA1 (3/46, 2%), 15-d-PGJ2 (2/30, 6%), and 8-iso-PGA2 (3/48, 6%). Moreover, the magnitude of the increase in [Ca2+]i in the few neurons from TRPA1−/− mice that responded to cyclopentenone compounds was always <5% of that of ionomycin, whereas responses of neurons from TRPA1+/+ mice were 30–50% of the ionomycin response (Fig. 1C). No response to PGD2 was observed in neurons from either TRPA1+/+ or TRPA1−/− mice (Fig. 1C). In cultured DRG neurons from Swiss mice PGE2 caused a small response (maximal response was 10.9 ± 1.2% of ionomycin, n = 84 cells), with an EC50 of 7.6 (C.I., 2.7–21.4) μM. The small calcium response to PGE2 was identical in TRPA1+/+ and TRPA1−/− mice (Fig. 1 B and C), and the proportion of neurons responding to both PGE2 and capsaicin was identical in TRPA1+/+ (8/25, 32%) and TRPA1−/− (12/40 30%) mice. As expected, the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin produced similar responses in neurons from TRPA1+/+ and TRPA1−/− mice (Fig. 1 B and C), whereas the selective TRPA1 agonist, cinnamaldehyde (25), evoked calcium responses exclusively in neurons from TRPA1+/+ mice (Fig. 1C). Thus, cyclopentenone PGs and isoprostane strongly excite nociceptive neurons by a mechanism that is entirely and exclusively dependent on TRPA1, whereas the minor response to PGE2 is unrelated to TRPA1.

Cyclopentenone PGs Release Neuropeptides from Central Endings of Nociceptors.

To test whether TRPA1-evoked calcium mobilization by cyclopentenone compounds stimulated the release of neuropeptides from central endings of nociceptors, we challenged slices of rat dorsal spinal cord with cyclopentenone PGs and measured release of CGRP and SP. 15-d-PGJ2, PGA2, PGA1, and 8-iso-PGA2 (30 μM) strongly stimulated CGRP and SP release (Fig. 2). Desensitization of nociceptors by prolonged exposure to a high concentration of capsaicin (10 μM, 20 min) abolished these responses. This procedure renders capsaicin-sensitive nerve terminals unresponsive to substances that excite nociceptors through TRPV1 and other mechanisms (26, 27). Depletion of extracellular calcium also abolished responses to cyclopentenone PGs (Fig. 2). Thus, cyclopentenone PGs or isoprostane release CGRP and SP, two major neuropeptides associated with pain transmission by capsaicin-sensitive nociceptive nerve terminals in the dorsal spinal cord.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Cyclopentenone PGs and isoprostane release neuropeptides in the dorsal spinal cord. Release of CGRP-like immunoreactivity (LI) (upper panel) and SP-LI (bottom panel) from slices of rat spinal cord after exposure to cyclopentenone PGs or isoprostane (30 μM). Desensitization by pretreatment with capsaicin (CPS), or omission and chelation of extracellular Ca2+ (1 mM EDTA, −Ca) abolished the evoked neuropeptide release. Each column represents mean ± SEM; n ≥ 4 experiments per condition. *, P < 0.05 compared with cyclopentenone agonist alone.

Cyclopentenone PGs Activate Spinal Nociceptive Neurons by a TRPA1-Dependent Mechanism.

We examined whether cyclopentenone PGs and 8-iso-PGA2 activate a nociceptive pathway in the spinal cord by stimulating TRPA1. PGs were administered to the mouse paw and c-fos was localized in neurons of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord as an indicator of neuronal activation. Intraplantar injection (20 μl/paw) of vehicle stimulated a modest increase in the number of c-fos containing neurons in the lumbar spinal cord that was similar in TRPA1+/+ or TRPA1−/− mice (Fig. 3B). Intraplantar injection of capsaicin (0.1 nmol) or cinnamaldehyde (30 nmol) produced a 2- to 3-fold increase in c-fos expression in TRPA1+/+ mice, respectively (Fig. 3B) [see supporting information (SI) Fig. S1]. While the effect of capsaicin was maintained, the response to cinnamaldehyde was completely absent in TRPA1−/− mice (Fig. 3B and Fig. S1). Intraplantar injection of 15-d-PGJ2, PGA2, PGA1, and 8-iso-PGA2 (15 nmol) produced a robust increase in c-fos expression in TRPA1+/+ mice, but not in TRPA1−/− mice. Intraplantar PGE2 (15 nmol) increased c-fos expression in a similar manner in both TRPA1+/+ and TRPA1−/− mice (Fig. 3 A and B). Thus, cyclopentenone PGs and isoprostane activate a spinal nociceptive pathway by a mechanism that requires TRPA1, but PGE2 activates that pathway by a TRPA1-independent mechanism.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Cyclopentenone PGs and isoprostane evoke c-fos expression in L4–L5 spinal cord lumbar sections. Photomicrographs (A) of transverse sections of the lumbar spinal cord and pooled data (B) showing the effects of intraplantar injection of cinnamaldehyde (CNM, 30 nmol) capsaicin (CPS, 0.1 nmol), cyclopentenone prostaglandins or isoprostane (15 nmol each) on the expression of c-fos-like immunoreactivity (LI) in TRPA1+/+ (gray or orange columns) or TRPA1−/− (filled or red columns) mice 90 min after injection in the hind paw (4–5 animals for each treatment). Each photomicrograph is a representative example of one section (L4–L5) of dorsal horn ipsilateral to the injection. CNM, 15-d-PGJ2, PGE2, PGA1, PGA2, and 8-iso-PGA2 and CPS increased c-fos-LI in TRPA1+/+ mice. In TRPA1−/− mice the effects of CPS and PGE2 were maintained, whereas the effects of CNM, 15-d-PGJ2, PGE2, PGA1, PGA2 were abolished. The vehicle induced a moderate increase in c-fos-LI expression, identical in TRPA1+/+ and TRPA1−/− mice. Each column represents the mean ± SEM of c-fos immunoreactive cells; n ≥ 10 slices per condition in L4–L5 segments; *, P < 0.05 compared with TRPA1+/+ mice.

Cyclopentenone PGs Induce Pain by a TRPA1-Dependent Mechanism.

We investigated whether cyclopentenone PG- and isoprostane-evoked nociceptor stimulation, release of sensory neuropeptides, and c-fos expression in the spinal cord were associated with a nocicefensive response and examined the contribution of TRPA1 to this response. Intraplantar injection (20 μl/paw) of capsaicin (0.1 nmol) or cinnamaldehyde (30 nmol) caused a rapid and intense nociceptive response that terminated after 2–4 min in TRPA1+/+ mice (Fig. 4). In TRPA1−/− mice the response to capsaicin was unaltered, whereas that to cinnamaldehyde was completely absent (Fig. 4). Intraplantar injection of 15-d-PGJ2 (15 nmol) caused a robust nociceptive behavior in TRPA1+/+ mice that was maximal at 1 min and sustained for 5–7 min (Fig. 4). 15-d-PGJ2 failed to produce any significant increase in nociceptive behavior in TRPA1−/− mice (Fig. 4). PGA2, PGA1, and 8-iso-PGA2 (15 nmol) evoked nociceptive behaviors similar to that of 15-d-PGJ2 in TRPA1+/+ mice (Fig. 4). Responses were all rapid in onset and lasted <10 min. These responses were practically absent in TRPA1−/− mice (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

TRPA1 mediates cyclopentenone PG- and isoprostane-induced nocifensive behavior in mice. Agonists were injected into the hind paws of TRPA1+/+ (empty circles or gray and orange columns) or TRPA1−/− (filled circles or filled and red columns) mice, and time spent licking or lifting after the injection was recorded for 15 min. Insets show the total time spent licking or lifting over the 15 min of observation. 15-d-PGJ2, PGA1, PGA2, or 8-iso-PGA2 (all 15 nmol) caused an early and transient nociceptive response in TRPA+/+ mice, an effect that was completely absent in TRPA1−/− littermates. In TRPA+/+ mice, the TRPA1 agonist cinnamaldehyde (30 nmol) and the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin (0.1 nmol) produced a response with a time course similar to that of cyclopentenone compounds. Whereas the response to capsaicin was maintained, that to cinnamaldehyde was abolished in TRPA1−/− mice. PGD2 (15 nmol) did not evoke any measurable nociceptive behavior either in TRPA1+/+ or in TRPA1−/− mice. PGE2 (15 nmol) produced a slowly developing and protracted nociceptive behavior that was similar in TRPA1+/+ and TRPA1−/− mice. Error bars indicate mean ± SEM of 6–9 animals per trial; *, P < 0.05 vs. TRPA1+/+ mice.

Intraplantar injection of PGD2 (15 nmol) did not evoke detectable nociceptive behavior either in TRPA1+/+ or TRPA1−/− mice (Fig. 4). PGE2 (15 nmol) produced a slowly developing and mild-to-moderate nociceptive behavior in TRPA1+/+ mice. The response to PGE2, that was absent or minimal during the first 4–5 min, increased with time, becoming more evident after 8–10 min and was still present at 15 min. Nociceptive behavior evoked by PGE2 was indistinguishable in TRPA1+/+ and TRPA1−/− mice (Fig. 4). The vehicle did not produce nociceptive behavior. Thus, 15-d-PGJ2, PGA2, PGA1, and 8-iso-PGA2 cause nociception by TRPA1 activation. The time course of cyclopentenone PGs- and isoprostane-evoked nociception is similar to that caused by other agents that directly activate nociceptors, such as capsaicin or cinnamaldehyde, and different from that evoked by agents that indirectly sensitize nociceptors, such as PGE2.

Discussion

Injury and inflammation are associated with increased prostanoid synthesis and pain hypersensitivity. Prostanoids mediate inflammation and immune responses, as their administration reproduces the major signs of inflammation, including hyperalgesia (79). Prostanoids induce pain by indirect mechanisms of nociceptor sensitization. Thus, prostanoids activate neuronal PG receptors, mainly of the EP subtype, that couple to downstream mediators including cAMP and protein kinases A and C (28, 29), which activate voltage-dependent sodium channels (30), or inhibit voltage-dependent potassium channels (31), inducing neuronal hypersensitivity. Prostanoids similarly sensitize other channels on sensory neurons to cause hyperalgesia, as is the case for TRPV1, where PGs lowered the threshold temperature for channel activation (32). There is no evidence that PGs cause pain by direct stimulation of nociceptors (79). However, nonenzymatic pathways of PG degradation produce metabolites, including cyclopentenone PGs, whose known biological functions are not mediated by G protein-coupled prostanoid receptors. For example, 15-d-PGJ2, which has been extensively investigated, exerts delayed anti-inflammatory and antihyperalgesic effects via stimulation of the PPAR-γ receptor (33, 34). We investigated whether these metabolites cause pain by directly activating nociceptors.

Recently, because of the presence of a highly reactive α,β-unsaturated bond in their structure, cyclopentenone PGs and isoprostane have been proposed as TRPA1 agonists (21). The TRPA1 channel, expressed in TRPV1-positive somatosensory neurons, is targeted by metabolic irritants generated during inflammation. In this manner, bradykinin-dependent activation of the B2 receptor stimulates a phospholipase Cβ-dependent pathway that activates TRPA1 and causes pain (14). Alternatively, bioactive aldehydes including acrolein and 4-HNE, which originates from peroxidation of plasma membrane phospholipids during oxidative stress (14, 18), directly gate TRPA1 by covalent binding to cysteine and lysine residues of the intracellular N terminus of the channel (18, 35, 36). The relevance of the TRPA1 channel in pain has been further highlighted by the finding that nociception produced by formalin injection in mouse paw, a widely used assay for testing analgesic compounds, is entirely due to the action of formaldehyde on TRPA1 (17, 19). Our results show that TRPA1 mediates the pro-algesic effects evoked by COX-dependent (cyclopentenone PGs) and COX-independent (cyclopentenone isoprostane) fatty acid metabolites. We observed that the cyclopentenone compounds, 15-d-PGJ2, PGA2, PGA1 and 8-iso-PGA2, directly excited nociceptors of isolated DRG neurons to increase intracellular calcium, resulting in the release of SP and CGRP, mediators of neurogenic inflammation and pain transmission. When injected into the paw, these PGs induced c-fos expression in spinal neurons of the dorsal horn, indicating activation of spinal nociceptive pathways and caused a robust nociceptive response. The observation that TRPA1-deficient mice were completely unresponsive to cyclopentenone PGs and isoprostane provides conclusive evidence that expression of this channel is necessary and sufficient for the algesic action of cyclopentenone metabolites of arachidonic or dihomo-γ-linolenic acid.

In contrast to their cyclopentenone metabolites, PGD2 (15-d-PGJ2 precursor) and PGE2 (PGA2 precursor), either did not produce any nociceptive effect (PGD2) or evoked neuronal responses and nociceptive effects (PGE2) that were completely independent from TRPA1 activation. PGD2 is the most abundant PG released from inflammatory cells at sites of inflammation (37). Although PGD2 can inhibit postspike hyperpolarization of nociceptors in vagal afferents (38), we and others (39, 40) reported that it is unable to directly excite DRG or trigeminal neurons. Thus, although its relevance in nociception remains per se questionable, the role of all PGD2-derived cyclopentenone metabolites (20) should be considered in pain transmission. It is well established that PGE2 indirectly sensitizes nociceptors through activating prostanoid receptors that regulate ion channels and lower pain thresholds (79). We observed that the time course of the nociceptive behavior evoked by intraplantar PGE2 was dissimilar from that produced by its cyclopentenone metabolite, PGA2. PGE2-evoked pain was delayed and protracted, suggesting indirect sensitization, whereas PGA2-evoked pain was immediate and transient, indicating direct nociceptor stimulation. Indeed, all cyclopentenone PGs and isoprostane evoked similar immediate and transient nociceptive responses, comparable to those elicited by other direct algesic compounds, such as cinnamaldehyde and capsaicin. Thus, our results indicate that the cyclopentenone PGs, derived from PGs that either sensitize or do not target nociceptors, elicit pain responses by directly stimulating TRPA1.

An important question is whether cyclopentenone PGs or isoprostane are produced in sufficient amount to stimulate the TRPA1 at sites of inflammation or injury. Although formation of cyclopentenone PGs from their parent compounds has been demonstrated both in vitro and in vivo (34, 37, 41), the extent to which cyclopentenone PGs are formed in vivo is unclear. The unsaturated carbonyl groups of cyclopentenone PGs rapidly react with thiol-containing proteins and peptides, and measurements of 15-d-PGJ2 (or other cyclopentenone PGs) in vivo underestimates true concentrations. Thus, 15-d-PGJ2 is detectable in vivo primarily as a Michael conjugate to gluthatione (42). The same consideration applies to the measurement of 8-iso-PGA2 levels at sites of inflammation or tissue injury (22). Thus, more appropriate methods are required to assess actual levels of PGA1, PGA2, 15-d-PGJ2, and 8-iso-PGA2 adducts and thereby assess their contribution to inflammatory pain.

NSAIDs and Coxibs are considered to produce analgesia via their anti-inflammatory action because of inhibition of PG generation. Our results extend the mechanism of the antinociceptive action of NSAIDs/Coxibs from preventing indirect nociceptor sensitization by classical PGs, to inhibiting direct nociceptive activation by cyclopentenone PGs and TRPA1. The beneficial actions of NSAIDs and Coxibs are offset by their well known and severe adverse effects in the gastrointestinal (79) and cardiovascular systems (43). TRPA1-mediated pain is also induced by other irritant COX-independent fatty acid metabolites, such as 8-iso-PGA2 or 4-HNE (18, 22, 23, 44). Should these compounds play a significant role in inflammatory pain, their action would be clearly unaffected by NSAIDs or Coxib, whereas it could be blocked by TRPA1 antagonists. Thus, TRPA1 inhibitors could represent a novel therapeutic strategy for reducing inflammatory pain, with consistent advantages at the level of both safety and efficacy. Compared with NSAIDs and Coxibs, their use should not be associated with adverse effects in the gastrointestinal (79) and cardiovascular systems (43), where PG biosynthesis would be preserved. Moreover, TRPA1 antagonists could reduce pain evoked by COX-independent nociceptive fatty acid metabolites.

Materials and Methods

Reagents.

PGD2, PGA1, PGA2, 15-d-PGJ2, and 8-iso-PGA2 were from Cayman Chemicals; PGE2, cinnamaldehyde, and capsaicin from Sigma; rabbit anti-c-fos from Santa Cruz Biotechnology; goat anti-rabbit biotinylated ABC and DAB kits from Vector Laboratories; and Fura-2-AM-ester from Alexis Biochemicals or Invitrogen.

Animals.

Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Florence and the University of California, San Francisco approved all procedures. Sprague–Dawley rats (male, 250 g), Swiss mice, TRPA1−/− mice (14), and wild-type littermates (male, 30 g) were housed in a temperature- and humidity-controlled vivarium (12 h dark/light cycle, free access to food and water). The TRPA1 heterozygote male mice had been backcrossed with C57BL/6 female mice for two generations to obtain the C57BL/6 genetic background. TRPA1-wild-type and -deficient mice used in the present experiments derived from breeding heterozygous animals. Experiments with TRPA1-wild-type and -deficient littermates were blinded to the genotype. Animals were killed with sodium pentobarbital (200 mg/kg i.p.) and thoracotomy.

DRG Neuron Isolation and Culture.

DRG from thoracic and lumbar spinal cord of mice were removed and minced in cold HBSS as described in ref. 45. Ganglia were digested using 1 mg/ml of collagenase type 1A and 1 mg/ml of papain in HBSS (25 min, 37°C). Neurons were pelleted and resuspended in Ham's-F12 containing 10% FBS, 100 U/ml of penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml of streptomycin, and 2 mM glutamine, dissociated by gentle trituration, and plated on glass coverslips coated with poly-L-lysine (8.3 μM) and laminin (5 μM). Neurons were cultured for 3–4 d.

Calcium Imaging.

DRG neurons were loaded with Fura-2-AM (5 μM) in HBSS containing CaCl2 1.6 mM, KCl 5.4 mM, MgSO4 0.4 mM, NaCl 135 mM, D-glucose 5 mM, Hepes 10 mM, BSA 0.1%, pH 7.4 (40 min, 37°C). Cells were washed and transferred to a chamber for recording changes by the F340/F380 ratio in individual neurons using a dynamic image analysis system as described in ref. 45. DRG were challenged with capsaicin (1 μM) and by KCl (50 mM) to identify nociceptive neurons and at the end of each experiment with ionomycin (5 μM). Results are expressed as the percentage of the maximum response to ionomycin.

Neuropeptide Release.

Slices (0.4 mm) of the lumbar enlargements of the dorsal spinal cord from rats were stabilized for 60 min in an oxygenated Krebs solution at 37°C. Fractions (4 ml) were collected at 10-min intervals into ethanoic acid (final concentration 2 N) before, during, and after administration of cyclopentenone PGs or isoprostane. Fractions were freeze-dried, reconstituted with assay buffer, and analyzed for CGRP and SP immunoreactivities as described in ref. 45. Neither cyclopentenone PGs nor cyclopentenone isoprostane (30 μM) cross-reacted with SP or CGRP antisera. Exposure to capsaicin (10 μM, 20 min) was used to produce a specific and complete desensitization of TRPV1-expressing sensory nerve terminals. Further details are reported in a SI Text section.

C-fos Localization.

The following agents were injected into the plantar surface of one hind paw (20 μl/paw) of mice: cyclopentenone PGs or isoprostane (15 nmol), cinnamaldehyde (30 nmol), capsaicin (0.1 nmol) or vehicle (7.5% DMSO in PBS). After 90 min, animals were transcardially perfused with 0.1 M of PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Spinal segments (L4–L5) were immersion fixed in paraformaldehyde overnight, and 20-μm coronal sections prepared using a freezing microtome. Serial sections were incubated with c-fos antibody (1:5000, overnight, 4°C), washed, incubated with goat anti-rabbit biotinylated antibody (1:500, 1 h, room temperature), and stained using avidin-biotin peroxidase complex and chromogen nickel/3.3′-diaminobenzidine solution. Ten sections for each mouse were randomly selected and the expression of c-fos immunoreactivity was evaluated by counting the number of positive neurons in the superficial dorsal horn region (lamina I–II).

Nocifensive Responses.

Agonists were injected into the mouse paw as described (46, 47). Immediately after injection, mice were placed in a Plexiglas chamber. The total time spent licking and lifting of the injected hind paw was recorded for 15 min. Further details are reported in a SI Text section.

Statistical Analysis.

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined using Student's t test for unpaired data or the two-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni's post hoc analysis. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Agonist potency was expressed as the molar concentration producing 50% of the maximal effect (EC50).

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgments.

We thank David Julius (University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) for providing TRPA1-deficient mice. This work was supported by grants from Ente Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze (Florence); Ministry for University and Scientific Research (MiUR) Rome, Italy Grants FIRB RBIP06YM29 and PRIN 2006069824_004 (P.G. and R.P.); and National Institutes of Health Grants DK 57840, DK 39957, and DK 43207 (N.W.B.).

NOTE.

Contemporary to the submission of the present study a paper has been published (48) reporting that reactive oxygen species and 15-d-PGJ2 stimulated TRPA1 and that the nociceptive behavior evoked by 15-d-PGJ2 was absent in TRPA1-deficient mice. However, this study failed to detect a calcium response by PGA2 in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the mouse TRPA1. This observation is at variance with previous (21) and present (Fig. 1) data obtained in HEK293 cells expressing the human TRPA1 and mouse DRG neurons, respectively.

Footnotes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0802354105/DCSupplemental.

References

  • 1.Kirtland SJ. Prostaglandin E1: A review. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 1988;32:165–174. doi: 10.1016/0952-3278(88)90168-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vane JR. Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis as a mechanism of action for aspirin-like drugs. Nat New Biol. 1971;231:232–235. doi: 10.1038/newbio231232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bos CL, Richel DJ, Ritsema T, Peppelenbosch MP, Versteeg HH. Prostanoids and prostanoid receptors in signal transduction. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:1187–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2003.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Narumiya S, Sugimoto Y, Ushikubi F. Prostanoid receptors: Structures, properties, and functions. Physiol Rev. 1999;79:1193–1226. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.4.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ferreira SH. Prostaglandins, aspirin-like drugs and analgesia. Nat New Biol. 1972;240:200–203. doi: 10.1038/newbio240200a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ferreira SH, Nakamura M, de Abreu Castro MS. The hyperalgesic effects of prostacyclin and prostaglandin E2. Prostaglandins. 1978;16:31–37. doi: 10.1016/0090-6980(78)90199-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tilley SL, Coffman TM, Koller BH. Mixed messages: Modulation of inflammation and immune responses by prostaglandins and thromboxanes. J Clin Invest. 2001;108:15–23. doi: 10.1172/JCI13416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zeilhofer HU. Prostanoids in nociception and pain. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;73:165–174. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.07.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Samad TA, Sapirstein A, Woolf CJ. Prostanoids and pain: Unraveling mechanisms and revealing therapeutic targets. Trends Mol Med. 2002;8:390–396. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4914(02)02383-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jaquemar D, Schenker T, Trueb B. An ankyrin-like protein with transmembrane domains is specifically lost after oncogenic transformation of human fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:7325–7333. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.11.7325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nilius B, Owsianik G, Voets T, Peters JA. Transient receptor potential cation channels in disease. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:165–217. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00021.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Caterina MJ, et al. The capsaicin receptor: A heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature. 1997;389:816–824. doi: 10.1038/39807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Story GM, et al. ANKTM1, a TRP-like channel expressed in nociceptive neurons, is activated by cold temperatures. Cell. 2003;112:819–829. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00158-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bautista DM, et al. TRPA1 mediates the inflammatory actions of environmental irritants and proalgesic agents. Cell. 2006;124:1269–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Geppetti P, Holzer P. Neurogenic Inflammation. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jordt SE, et al. Mustard oils and cannabinoids excite sensory nerve fibres through the TRP channel ANKTM1. Nature. 2004;427:260–265. doi: 10.1038/nature02282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McNamara CR, et al. TRPA1 mediates formalin-induced pain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:13525–13530. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705924104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Trevisani M, et al. 4-Hydroxynonenal, an endogenous aldehyde, causes pain and neurogenic inflammation through activation of the irritant receptor TRPA1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:13519–13524. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705923104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Macpherson LJ, et al. An ion channel essential for sensing chemical damage. J Neurosci. 2007;27:11412–11415. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3600-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Straus DS, Glass CK. Cyclopentenone prostaglandins: New insights on biological activities and cellular targets. Med Res Rev. 2001;21:185–210. doi: 10.1002/med.1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Taylor-Clark TE, et al. Prostaglandin-induced activation of nociceptive neurons via direct interaction with transient receptor potential A1 (TRPA1) Mol Pharmacol. 2008;73:274–281. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.040832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Milne GL, Musiek ES, Morrow JD. The cyclopentenone (A2/J2) isoprostanes–unique, highly reactive products of arachidonate peroxidation. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005;7:210–220. doi: 10.1089/ars.2005.7.210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen Y, Zackert WE, Roberts LJ, 2nd, Morrow JD. Evidence for the formation of a novel cyclopentenone isoprostane, 15-A2t-isoprostane (8-iso-prostaglandin A2) in vivo. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1436:550–556. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2760(98)00168-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nagata K, Duggan A, Kumar G, Garcia-Anoveros J. Nociceptor and hair cell transducer properties of TRPA1, a channel for pain and hearing. J Neurosci. 2005;25:4052–4061. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0013-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bandell M, et al. Noxious cold ion channel TRPA1 is activated by pungent compounds and bradykinin. Neuron. 2004;41:849–857. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00150-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Szallasi A, Blumberg PM. Vanilloid (Capsaicin) receptors and mechanisms. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51:159–212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Szolcsanyi J. A pharmacological approach to elucidation of the role of different nerve fibres and receptor endings in mediation of pain. J Physiol (Paris) 1977;73:251–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aley KO, Levine JD. Role of protein kinase A in the maintenance of inflammatory pain. J Neurosci. 1999;19:2181–2186. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-06-02181.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Khasar SG, et al. A novel nociceptor signaling pathway revealed in protein kinase C epsilon mutant mice. Neuron. 1999;24:253–260. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80837-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gold MS, Reichling DB, Shuster MJ, Levine JD. Hyperalgesic agents increase a tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ current in nociceptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:1108–1112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.3.1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Evans AR, Vasko MR, Nicol GD. The cAMP transduction cascade mediates the PGE2-induced inhibition of potassium currents in rat sensory neurones. J Physiol. 1999;516:163–178. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.163aa.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moriyama T, et al. Sensitization of TRPV1 by EP1 and IP reveals peripheral nociceptive mechanism of prostaglandins. Mol Pain. 2005;1:3. doi: 10.1186/1744-8069-1-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ricote M, Li AC, Willson TM, Kelly CJ, Glass CK. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma is a negative regulator of macrophage activation. Nature. 1998;391:79–82. doi: 10.1038/34178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gilroy DW, et al. Inducible cyclooxygenase may have anti-inflammatory properties. Nat Med. 1999;5:698–701. doi: 10.1038/9550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hinman A, Chuang HH, Bautista DM, Julius D. TRP channel activation by reversible covalent modification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:19564–19568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609598103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Macpherson LJ, et al. Noxious compounds activate TRPA1 ion channels through covalent modification of cysteines. Nature. 2007;445:541–545. doi: 10.1038/nature05544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Shibata T, et al. 15-deoxy-delta 12,14-prostaglandin J2. A prostaglandin D2 metabolite generated during inflammatory processes. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:10459–10466. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110314200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Greene R, Fowler J, MacGlashan D, Jr, Weinreich D. IgE-challenged human lung mast cells excite vagal sensory neurons in vitro. J Appl Physiol. 1988;64:2249–2253. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1988.64.5.2249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hwang SW, et al. Direct activation of capsaicin receptors by products of lipoxygenases: Endogenous capsaicin-like substances. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:6155–6160. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.11.6155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang XC, Strassman AM, Burstein R, Levy D. Sensitization and activation of intracranial meningeal nociceptors by mast cell mediators. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2007;322:806–812. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.123745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kikawa Y, Narumiya S, Fukushima M, Wakatsuka H, Hayaishi O. 9-Deoxy-delta 9, delta 12–13,14-dihydroprostaglandin D2, a metabolite of prostaglandin D2 formed in human plasma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81:1317–1321. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.5.1317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Brunoldi EM, et al. Cyclopentenone prostaglandin, 15-deoxy-Delta12,14-PGJ2, is metabolized by HepG2 cells via conjugation with glutathione. Chem Res Toxicol. 2007;20:1528–1535. doi: 10.1021/tx700231a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Spektor G, Fuster V. Drug insight: Cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk–where are we now? Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2005;2:290–300. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Benedetti A, Comporti M, Esterbauer H. Identification of 4-hydroxynonenal as a cytotoxic product originating from the peroxidation of liver microsomal lipids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980;620:281–296. doi: 10.1016/0005-2760(80)90209-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Trevisani M, et al. Ethanol elicits and potentiates nociceptor responses via the vanilloid receptor-1. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:546–551. doi: 10.1038/nn0602-852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sakurada T, Katsumata K, Tan-No K, Sakurada S, Kisara K. The capsaicin test in mice for evaluating tachykinin antagonists in the spinal cord. Neuropharmacology. 1992;31:1279–1285. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(92)90057-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ferreira J, da Silva GL, Calixto JB. Contribution of vanilloid receptors to the overt nociception induced by B2 kinin receptor activation in mice. Br J Pharmacol. 2004;141:787–794. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Andersson DA, Gentry C, Moss S, Bevan S. Transient receptor potential A1 is a sensory receptor for multiple products of oxidative stress. J Neurosci. 2008;28:2485–2494. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5369-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES