Abstract
L-type voltage-gated Ca2+channels (VGCC) play an important role in dendritic development, neuronal survival, and synaptic plasticity. Recent studies have demonstrated that the gonadal steroid estrogen rapidly induces Ca2+ influx in hippocampal neurons, which is required for neuroprotection and potentiation of LTP. The mechanism by which estrogen rapidly induces this Ca2+ influx is not clearly understood. We show by electrophysiological studies that extremely low concentrations of estrogens acutely potentiate VGCC in hippocampal neurons, hippocampal slices, and HEK-293 cells transfected with neuronal L-type VGCC, in a manner that was estrogen receptor (ER)-independent. Equilibrium, competitive, and whole-cell binding assays indicate that estrogen directly interacts with the VGCC. Furthermore, a L-type VGCC antagonist to the dihydropyridine site displaced estrogen binding to neuronal membranes, and the effects of estrogen were markedly attenuated in a mutant, dihydropyridine-insensitive L-type VGCC, demonstrating a direct interaction of estrogens with L-type VGCC. Thus, estrogen-induced potentiation of calcium influx via L-type VGCC may link electrical events with rapid intracellular signaling seen with estrogen exposure leading to modulation of synaptic plasticity, neuroprotection, and memory formation.
Keywords: estrogen receptors, signaling, estradiol, memory
A large body of evidence shows that estrogens exert multiple rapid effects on the structure and function of neurons in a variety of brain regions, including the hippocampus (1). For example, estrogens rapidly potentiate kainite-induced currents in hippocampal neurons from wild-type (2) as well as from estrogen-receptor (ER)-α knockout (3) mice and induce rapid spine synapse formation in the CA1 hippocampus of ovariectomized (OVX) rats (4). Furthermore, acute application of estrogens to hippocampal slices increases NMDA and AMPA receptor transmission (5), induces long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) (6), and rapidly modulates neuronal excitability in rat medial amygdala (7) and hippocampus(8).
It is well known that estrogens interact with cell membrane components and initiate signaling events leading to a rise in intracellular Ca2+, and activation of Src kinase, G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), MAPK, PI3K/AKT, PKA, and adenylyl cyclase (9). The mechanism(s) by which estrogens induce these rapid and diverse effects remains largely unknown. Ca2+ is a second messenger that can trigger the modification of synaptic efficacy. A plasticity-induction protocol like repetitive low-frequency synaptic stimulation (10) induces the elevation of postsynaptic intracellular Ca2+. The level of intracellular Ca2+ concentration can activate numerous kinases like CAMK, PKA, PKC, MAPK, PI3K, or phosphatases (11–15), which, respectively, phosphorylate or dephosphorylate ion channels, transcription factors, and other proteins that are involved in synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Because voltage-gated Ca2+channels (VGCC)-mediated extracellular Ca2+ influx in neurons initiates the activation of these same signaling cascades (16–20), we hypothesized that estrogens potentiate VGCC. Here, we report that estrogen facilitates L-type VGCC in hippocampal neurons via an ER-independent mechanism, through direct binding with a domain that overlaps the dihydropyridine-binding site. Moreover, the capacity of estrogen to potentiate specifically L-type Cav1.2 as shown here may impart a distinctive role of estrogen in modification of synaptic efficacy.
Results
Estrogen Potentiates L-Type VGCC.
Initial reports have shown that 17β-estradiol induces rapid rise of intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in hippocampal neurons that was inhibited by an L-type calcium channel blocker (21). Whereas the authors indicated estrogen-mediated activation of signaling events was responsible for the effect, an alternative possibility is that estrogen directly binds to and enhances the activity of the channel.
To test this hypothesis, we measured the effects of estrogens on whole-cell Ba2+/Ca2+ currents in embryonic day (E)18 primary cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Ca2+ channel currents were isolated by inhibiting Na+ currents with extracellular tetrodotoxin and K+ channels with intracellular Cs+ and extracellular 4-AP, and either Ba2+ or Ca2+ was used as the charge carrier. Fig. 1A shows depolarization-activated Ba2+currents (IBa2+) recorded from this hippocampal neuron in the absence (control) or presence of 100 pM 17β-E2. The average amplitude of Ba2+ current was 93 ± 13 pA in the control condition from a single hippocampal neuron. In the presence of 100 pM 17β-E2, the Ba2+ currents were increased to 192 ± 18% of the control (Fig. 1A). The potentiating effect persisted even after washout of estrogen. In a number of experiments, we observed that the stimulatory effect of a 5-min exposure to estrogen persisted for >20 minutes (data not shown). In addition, we observed a similar effect of estrogen in a hippocampal slice preparation [supporting information (SI) Fig. S1].
Fig. 1.
The modulatory effects of 17β-E2 on VGCC currents recorded in hippocampal neurons. (A) Whole-cell Ba2+ current (IBa2+) recorded from a primary hippocampal cultured neuron in the presence or absence of 17β-E2. IBa2+ (5 mM Ba2+ used as the charge carrier) was elicited by pulses to 0 mV from a holding potential of −90 mV. (B) Typical concentration-dependent effect of 17β-E2 on Ca2+ current recorded from a hippocampal neuron (C). Mean concentration dependence of 17β-E2 on hippocampal neuron Ca2+ currents. All currents were normalized to the control (assigned as 100%). Data are mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05, one-way ANOVA test; +, P < 0.05, compared with 10, 100 nM, Newman–Keuls multiple comparison test. (D) Rapid effect of estrogen on VGCC. The arrow indicates the time of application and initiation of trains of IBa2+ elicited by depolarization from −90 mV to 0 mV (set at 0 min). The current amplitudes were normalized to the control before application with 17β-E2 (n = 7) or saline (n = 4). Note that 17β-E2 caused an immediate enhancement of IBa2+, whereas the saline control had no effect. Furthermore, the estrogen effect was sustained even after application. (E) Effect of L-type Ca2+ channel inhibitor, nifedipine (Nif), on 17β-E2-induced potentiation of Ba2+ current. Bath application of 10 μM Nif completely blocked the potentiation of Ba2+ current by 17β-E2. (F) Summary of Nif blockade of 17β-E2-induced potentiation of Ba2+ currents. Nif blocked ≈1/3 of Ba2+ current, demonstrating the presence of L-type VGCCs. In the presence of Nif, the stimulatory effects of 17β-E2 were blocked. Current amplitudes were normalized to the control. Each data point represents four cells. *, P < 0.05, compared with the control; +, P < 0.05 compared with 17β-E2 alone, paired t test.
To determine whether the effect of estrogens on Ca2+ channels is concentration dependent, hippocampal neurons were exposed to various concentrations of 17β-E2 (Fig. 1B). Mean peak IBa2+ revealed a dose-dependent increase in Ba2+ currents with as little as 10 pM 17β-E2 (Fig. 1 B and C). Effects of 17β-E2 were also very rapid. The onset of estrogen action was estimated to be <550 ms (Fig. 1 D and Methods).
We sought to determine which Ca2+ channel subtype was being modulated by estrogens. Approximately 1/3 of the elicited Ba2+ current was due to activation of L-type Ca2+ channels, as evidenced by the inhibitory effects of the L-type inhibitor nifedipine. We thus assessed whether this channel may be a target of 17β-E2. As illustrated in Fig. 1 E and F, nifedipine (10 μM) nearly completely abolished the 17β-E2-induced potentiation of Ba2+ current, indicating that 17β-E2's ability to enhance Ca2+ current is due fully to potentiation of L-type channels.
Estrogen Action on L-Type VGCC Does Not Require Classical Estrogen Receptor.
Next, we asked whether the potentiation of VGCC is mediated by an estrogen-generated intracellular signal or by binding to a plasma membrane component. That 17β-E2 appears to increase Ba2+ currents by acting at the membrane surface rather than through an intracellular receptor was shown by the fact that membrane-impermeable 17β-E2-BSA was found to potentiate VGCC, although to a lesser extent than 17β-E2 alone (Fig. 2 A and B). To determine the role of ER in this response, we administered the ER antagonist, ICI-82,780, which did not antagonize the 17β-E2 potentiation of Ca2+ currents (Fig. 2 C and E). Furthermore, we tested the synthetic derivative of estrogen, ZYC-26 (2-adamantyl-estrone), which does not bind to either ERα or ERβ at concentrations ranging from 1 pM to 10 μM (22) and does not stimulate uterine growth in ovariectomized rats (23). As shown in Fig. 2 D and E, 100 pM ZYC-26 efficiently potentiated VGCC in hippocampal neurons.
Fig. 2.
The modulatory effects of 17β-E2 occur at the neuronal membrane and are ER independent. (A) Ca2+ current traces, shown in the presence or absence of 250 pM BSA-conjugated 17β-E2 in the bath solution. (B) Summary data: Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.05, paired t test, compared with the control; +, P < 0.05, unpaired t test, compared with 17β-E2 group. (C) Lack of role of ERs in estrogen-induced potentiation of L-type Ca2+ currents. The ability of estrogen to potentiate Ba2+ current in hippocampal neurons was not attenuated by 1 μM ER antagonist, ICI 182,780. (D) Potentiation of L-type Ca2+ currents by ZYC-26, a non-ER-binding estrogen analogue. Whole-cell hippocampal neuronal Ba2+ current was potentiated by 100 pM ZYC-26. (E) Summary of effect of ZYC-26 and ICI 182,780 on hippocampal Ba2+ current. For direct comparison, the 17β-E2 data from Fig. 1 C and D are replotted. *, P < 0.05, paired t test, compared with the control.
Estrogen Potentiates Recombinant Cav1.2 VGCC in the Absence of Estrogen Receptors.
Of the L-type VGCC in the hippocampus, the predominant isoform is Cav1.2 (24–26). Synaptic and extrasynaptic localizations of Cav1.2 L-type VGCC correspond to putative roles of L-type calcium currents in synaptic modulation and in the propagation of dendritic Ca2+ spikes (27–29). To investigate the direct action of estrogen on L-type Cav1.2, we assessed the action of 17β-E2 in HEK293 cells transiently cotransfected with the pore-forming subunit Cav1.2 and the accessory β1b and α2δ subunits and GFP expression plasmids. HEK293 cells do not endogenously express either L-type VGCC or estrogen receptors (30, 31). Transfected HEK cells (GFP positive) showed the expected Ca2+ current activated in response to the same depolarizing protocol (Fig. S2). However, in the absence of transfection of the neuronal L-type Ca2+ channel, no current could be elicited in these cells in response to depolarization, thus providing a model to assess the dependence of the observed 17β-E2 response on these two entities. As we observed in neurons, exposure of recombinant L-type Ca2+ channels to 17β-E2 resulted in a significantly enhanced Ca2+ current (Fig. S2). These data support our contention that the 17β-E2-potentiated Ba2+/Ca2+ current in hippocampal neurons is through the L-type Cav1.2 Ca2+ channel via a mechanism independent of ER.
Estrogen Induces Extracellular Calcium Influx Through L-Type VGCC.
To quantify the 17β-E2-induced potentiation of extracellular Ca2+ influx via VGCC, we measured intracellular Ca2+ transients induced by high-K+-mediated membrane depolarization using the Fura-2 dye and digital imaging microfluorometry. Fig. S3 shows that high K+-induced depolarization was able to activate VGCC. The 17β-E2 potentiated the extracellular Ca2+ influx in hippocampal neurons cultured in vitro, and nifedipine inhibited the potentiation of Ca2+ influx elicited by 17β-E2.
Estrogen-Induced L-Type VGCC Potentiation Mechanism.
The mechanism by which estrogens potentiate L-type Ca2+ channel was also addressed. One potential mechanism involves estrogen-induced rapid activation of L-type associated kinases such as PKA, PKC, and/or CaMKII. These kinases are known to facilitate L-type Ca2+ channels (32, 33). To assess this possibility, we used the pharmacological inhibitors of phospholipase C (PLC)/PKC and CaMKII. As shown in Fig. S4, neither PLC nor CaMKII inhibitors had an effect on estrogen-induced activation of L-type VGCC.
Next, we explored the possibility that potentiation of VGCC occurs as a result of direct binding of estrogen with the channel. It has been shown that estrogen and the estrogen-like compound F90927 directly potentiate Maxi-K (34) and L-type Ca2+ channels (35), respectively. Electrophysiological studies using charged dihydropyridines (DHPs) demonstrate that the binding site is accessible exclusively from the outside of the plasma membrane (36, 37). We assessed whole-cell binding of 17β-E2 to antagonist-binding sites on L-type Ca2+ channels. As shown in Fig. 3, an L-type Ca2+ channel antibody directed against a non-dihydropyridine-binding site region of the channel (Fig. 3, red) and 17β-E2-FITC-BSA (Fig. 3, green) showed membrane localization in HT-22 cells, an immortalized murine hippocampal neuronal cell line. This binding pattern resembled that of binding fluorescent (−) ST-BODIPY-DHP (Fig. 3, blue), an antagonist for L-type Ca2+ channels (35). Additionally, treatment of cells with an excess of nonfluorescent Bay K (1 μM), an L-type Ca2+ channel agonist, reduced both 17β-E2-FITC-BSA and DHP binding but did not affect L-type Ca2+ channel antibody binding (Fig. 3), suggesting that 17β E2 may bind to the same DHP agonist/antagonist-binding region of L-type calcium channels. We confirmed this idea by launching a two-pronged experimental approach. A competitive binding assay using membrane preparation from HEK 293 cells transiently transfected with wild-type α1c and the accessory subunits showed that estrogen competes with the radioligand [3H] PN200–110 for α1c binding with an IC50 of 0.67 nM (Fig. 4). Because competitive binding is done on membranes that are electrically neutral, and electrophysiological effects are voltage and channel state dependent, it is critical to study the coupling between estrogen binding and potentiation of calcium current. Thus, we used a specific mutant of α1c channel that is insensitive to both DHP agonists and antagonists and tested the effects of estrogen on potentiation of calcium current. As shown previously (38), mutant channels composed of Q1070M and T1066Y amino acid residues in motif III S5 of rabbit heart α1c subunit of L-type VGCC, are insensitive to DHP agonist and antagonist. Motif IIIS5 of rabbit heart α1c is 100% homologous with the rat brain α1c used in our experiment (Fig. S5). We therefore chose to test the effects of estrogen on the neuronal α1c mutant T1066Y channel. We confirmed that the T1066Y-expressing channel was insensitive to nifedipine (data not shown). Interestingly, the ability of estrogen to potentiate the T1066Y mutant channel was greatly attenuated (Fig. 5 B and C). Furthermore, whole-cell binding assays of transiently expressed wild-type α1C channels in HEK 293 cells (Fig. 6) show expression of α1C channels as evidenced by binding of a channel-specific antibody (Fig. 6A), binding of FITC-BSA-Estrogen (Fig. 6B), and binding of fluorescently labeled DHP antagonist (Fig. 6C). There was a markedly reduced binding of both FITC-BSA-Estrogen (Fig. 6F) and fluorescently labeled DHP antagonist (Fig. 6G) but not an antibody that recognizes both wild-type and mutant α1C channel protein (Fig. 6E), compared with the wild-type channel. This effect, coupled with our finding that estrogen competes with both a radiolabeled and a fluorescently tagged DHP, suggest that the binding domains overlap.
Fig. 3.
Bay K 8644 and 17β-E2 compete for the same fluorescent dihydropyridine (DHP)-binding sites in HT-22, a hippocampal cell line. (Upper) Confocal microscopy imaging from left to right: L-type Ca2+ channel α1C specific antibody staining of HT-22 cells (red), BSA-FITC conjugated 17 β-E2 (green), (−) ST-BODIPY-DHP, (4,4-difluro-7 steryl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza)-3-(s-indacene) propionic acid, high-affinity enantiomer (blue). (Lower) Both fluorescent BSA-FITC-E2 (1 nM) and fluorescent DHP (1 nM) binding was competed out in the presence of excess nonfluorescent DHP (Bay K 8644, 1 μM) as visualized by lesser fluorescent intensity compared with the control (Upper).
Fig. 4.
Competition binding curves for the displacement of 1 nM [3H] PN200–110 by varying concentrations of 17β-E2 in membranes from transiently transfected neuronal α1C and the auxiliary subunits-β1b and α2δ expression plasmids of L-type calcium channel in HEK293 cells. (Inset) Typical equilibrium binding curves for [3H] PN200–110 alone.
Fig. 5.
17β-E2 modulation is attenuated in dihydropyridin e-insensitive channels. (A) Modulation of L-type VGCC by 17β-E2 in wild-type and mutant α1C channels transiently expressed in HEK 293 cells. Whole-cell Ca2+ currents were recorded from the wild-type or mutant α1C T1066Y with a 55-ms depolarization pulse from holding potential of −90 to 0 mV. The 17 β-E2 (100 pM) was applied in the bath for 3 min. The ability of 17β-E2 to enhance Ca2+ currents was greatly attenuated in the dihydopyridine-insensitive L-type channel. (B) Mean results for these studies. The currents are normalized to the control (assigned as 100%). n = at least 4 cells. Note the sensitivity to 17β-E2. *, P < 0.05; compared with the wild type, unpaired t test.
Fig. 6.
DHP and 17β-E2 binding characteristics of wild-type α1C and mutant α1C (T1066Y) L-type VGCC transiently expressed in HEK-293 cell. (Upper) Confocal microscopy imaging of wild-type α1C channels stained for α1C specific antibody (red) (A), BSA-FITC-E2 (1 nM) binding (green) (B), (−) ST-BODIPY-DHP binding (blue) (C), and merge (D). (Lower) Confocal microscopy imaging of mutant (T1066Y) α1C channels stained for α1C-specific antibody (red) (E), BSA-FITC-E2 (1 nM) binding (green) (F), (−) ST-BODIPY-DHP binding (blue) (G), and merge (H).
Discussion
The rapid interaction of estrogens with L-type Ca2+ channels and the resulting potentiation of voltage-induced Ca2+ currents could explain the observation that multiple and diverse signaling pathways are rapidly activated by estrogens. Calcium transients, as a result of entry through L-type Ca2+ channels, are known to activate Src kinase, GPCR, MAPK, PI3K/AKT, PKA, and adenylyl cyclase signaling pathways (16–20).
These rapid actions of estrogens appear to explain the observation that in pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal women, estrogens affect neuronal activity measured by fMRI in a variety of brain regions during the performance of cognitive (39) and sustained attentional (40) tasks. Furthermore, estrogens enhance visual and place memory (41) and working memory performances in rats (42) and facilitate cholinergic neurotransmission in the septal–hippocampal pathways(43). Several mechanisms have been reported by which estrogen acutely and more chronically potentiates memory-related synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. Estradiol has been shown to increase dendritic spinogenesis in the hippocampus (44, 45), increase the expression of NMDA receptor (NMDAR) subunit NR2B (46), and potentiate NMDAR-mediated synaptic activity, including LTP (47, 48). The identity of the ER involved in potentiation of synaptic plasticity and memory has not yet been fully confirmed. For example, in one report, ER-α but not ER-β (49), yet in another report ER-β but not ER-α (50) regulates hippocampal synaptic plasticity and enhances cognitive ability. Our data suggest a possible mechanism by which estrogen, via L-type Ca2+ channel potentiation, modulates memory-related synaptic plasticity. Recently, it has been shown that activity of L-type Ca2+ channels is essential for generating persistent neural firing in a neural circuit that is involved in working memory (51). Also, theoretical studies have shown that L-type Ca2+ channels enhance persistent firing to variations in synaptic strength or neuronal excitability (52, 53). Therefore, we envisage that estrogen by augmenting persistent neural activity may enhance working memory performance seen in various experimental settings.
The lack of involvement of ERs in the observed potentiation by 17β-E2 of whole-cell hippocampal Ca2+ currents is supported by several observations. First, the potentiation was seen at 10 pM 17β-E2, a concentration that is 500-fold lower than the EC50 of 17β-E2 for either ERα or ERβ. Second, the potentiation was seen with ZYC-26, a nonfeminizing estrogen that does not interact in vitro or in vivo with either Ers (22, 23). Third, the 17β-E2 effects were not antagonized by concentrations of ICI-182,780 that are 35-fold higher than the IC50 for the ERs. Finally, HEK-293 cells transfected with the essential components of the L-type Ca2+ channel but lacking Ers (30, 31) also responded potently to 17β-E2.
We also studied the mechanism underlying the estrogen modulation of VGCC. The lack of effect of CaMK II or PLC/PKC inhibitors does not support that the observed estrogenic action is initiated by these intracellular signaling pathways. However, the very rapid onset of estrogen action, which was estimated to be less than a second, supports a direct interaction of estrogen with the channel protein. We confirmed this idea by (i) whole-cell binding assay using fluorescent ligand in hippocampal-derived neuronal cell line, HT22, where α1C channel expresses endogeneously; (ii) whole-cell binding in HEK293 cells transiently expressed mutant and wild-type α1C channel; (iii) competitive binding assay using radioligand; and (iv) electrophysiological studies using wild-type and dihydropyridine-insensitive channels. The displacement of a L-type Ca2+ channel agonist Bay K 8644 with estrogen also provides evidence for this direct mechanism. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that a structurally similar estrogen-like compound, F90927, has recently been shown to directly modulate L-type Ca2+ channels in myocytes (35). Our studies indicate that estrogen itself binds with high affinity to the L-type VGCC at a domain that overlaps with the dihydropyridine site.
Functional consequences of estrogen-induced potentiation of L-type Ca2+ channels in hippocampal neurons are now becoming clear. Neuronal activity-dependent potentiation of L-type Ca2+ channels has an important role in synaptic plasticity and in memory (27, 54, 55). Recently, the function of L-type Ca2+channels in spatial learning, synaptic plasticity, and triggering of learning associated biochemical processes were evaluated in a transgenic mouse with an inactivated gene that encodes the Cav1.2 gene in the hippocampus and neocortex (56). This study showed selective loss of protein synthesis-dependent but NMDAR-independent LTP, a severe impairment of hippocampus-dependent spatial memory, loss of activation of MAPK pathway, and repressed cAMP response element-dependent transcription in hippocampal neurons. Also, very recently, it has been shown that the activity of L-type calcium channels is important for spike timing-dependent LTP that is absent in Fragile X syndrome (57). Therefore, we speculate that estrogen-induced, direct potentiation of L-type Ca2+ channels could have implications in modulating synaptic plasticity and memory formation. Inasmuch as the L-type Ca2+ channel potentiation occurs at estradiol concentrations (10 to 1,000 pM) seen in reproductively competent rodents and women, we believe that these observations are relevant to neuronal regulation in both animals and women.
Materials and Methods
Brain Slice Preparation.
Transverse hippocampal brain slices (200 μm) were preferred for patch clamp recording. Details of the slice preparation procedure are provided in SI Text.
Primary Neuronal Cultures.
We also studied regulation of VGCCs by 17β-E2 in primary hippocampal cultures. Details of the preparation of the cultures are provided in SI Text.
Whole-Cell Recording.
Macroscopic Ca2+ or Ba2+ currents were measured by using whole-cell patch clamp (58). Recording solutions, protocols, and other details are provided in SI Text.
Construction and Properties of Mutant Calcium Channels.
We used a mutant α1c subunit containing a threonine-to-tyrosine point mutation at position 1036 of rat brain coding sequence, which was constructed by Michael E. Greenberg [Harvard University (19)]. This mutant is homologous to rabbit heart α1c mutant, as shown in Fig. S2. Electrophysiological studies of rabbit heart α1c mutant [T1066Y (38)] indicated that this mutant is insensitive to both agonist and antagonist without effecting the basal channel activity.
Expression of Ca2+ Channels.
HEK-293 cell were transfected by using TransIT-293 transfection reagent (Mirus). Cells were transfected with a 2:1:1 ratio of plasmid DNA composed of neuronal, wild-type, or mutant α1C (Cav1.2), β1b, and α2δ L-type subunits [gift from M. E. Greenberg, Harvard University (18)] and a GFP expression plasmid, pGFP-C1 (Clontech), with a ratio of 10:1 channel subunits to GFP. For whole-cell binding experiments, HEK-293 cells were transfected with a 2:1:1 ratio of plasmid DNA composed of either wild-type or mutant α1C (T1066Y) and β1b and α2δ L-type subunits.
Measurement of [Ca2+]i.
The measurement of Ca2+ influx into neuronal culture is described in detail in SI Text.
Whole-Cell Ligand Binding Assay.
Whole-cell ligand binding to HT-22 cells culture is described in detail in SI Text.
Preparation of Membranes.
Transfected HEK 293 cells were washed, scraped, and homogenized by using a glass–Teflon homogenizer in buffer X containing 50 mM Tris, 100 μM PNSF, 100 μM benzamidine, 1 μM pepstatin A, 1 μg/ml leupeptin, and 2 μg/ml aprotinin (pH 8.0). The homogenate was centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 100,000 × g in a Beckman ultra centrifuge using a SW 41 rotor for 1 h at 4°C. The membrane pellet was washed and resuspended in buffer X.
Radioligand Binding.
Detailed methods for the equilibrium binding assays culture is described in SI Text.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments.
We thank Dr. Philip Best (Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign) for his review and helpful comments during the course of these studies. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AG010485, AG 022550, and AG27956.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0802379105/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.McEwen B. Estrogen actions throughout the brain. Recent Prog Horm Res. 2002;57:357–384. doi: 10.1210/rp.57.1.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gu Q, Moss RL. Novel mechanism for non-genomic action of 17 beta-oestradiol on kainate-induced currents in isolated rat CA1 hippocampal neurones. J Physiol. 1998;506:745–754. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.745bv.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gu Q, Korach KS, Moss RL. Rapid action of 17beta-estradiol on kainate-induced currents in hippocampal neurons lacking intracellular estrogen receptors. Endocrinology. 1999;140:660–666. doi: 10.1210/endo.140.2.6500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.MacLusky NJ, Luine VN, Hajszan T, Leranth C. The 17alpha and 17beta isomers of estradiol both induce rapid spine synapse formation in the CA1 hippocampal subfield of ovariectomized female rats. Endocrinology. 2005;146:287–293. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-0730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Smith CC, McMahon LL. Estrogen-induced increase in the magnitude of long-term potentiation occurs only when the ratio of NMDA transmission to AMPA transmission is increased. J Neurosci. 2005;25:7780–7791. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0762-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Good M, Day M, Muir JL. Cyclical changes in endogenous levels of oestrogen modulate the induction of LTD and LTP in the hippocampal CA1 region. Eur J Neurosci. 1999;11:4476–4480. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00920.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nabekura J, Oomura Y, Minami T, Mizuno Y, Fukuda A. Mechanism of the rapid effect of 17 beta-estradiol on medial amygdala neurons. Science. 1986;233:226–228. doi: 10.1126/science.3726531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Teyler TJ, Vardaris RM, Lewis D, Rawitch AB. Gonadal steroids: Effects on excitability of hippocampal pyramidal cells. Science. 1980;209:1017–1018. doi: 10.1126/science.7190730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee SJ, McEwen BS. Neurotrophic and neuroprotective actions of estrogens and their therapeutic implications. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2001;41:569–591. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mulkey RM, Malenka RC. Mechanisms underlying induction of homosynaptic long-term depression in area CA1 of the hippocampus. Neuron. 1992;9:967–975. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90248-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Frodin M, et al. Glucose, other secretagogues, and nerve growth factor stimulate mitogen-activated protein kinase in the insulin-secreting beta-cell line, INS-1. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:7882–7889. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.14.7882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Finkbeiner S, Greenberg ME. Ca2+ channel-regulated neuronal gene expression. J Neurobiol. 1998;37:171–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Persaud S J, Wheeler-Jones C P, Jones P M. The mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in rat islets of Langerhans: Studies on the regulation of insulin secretion. Biochem J. 1996;313(Pt 1):119–124. doi: 10.1042/bj3130119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Macfarlane WM, et al. The p38/reactivating kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade mediates the activation of the transcription factor insulin upstream factor 1 and insulin gene transcription by high glucose in pancreatic beta-cells. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:20936–20944. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.33.20936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rhodes CJ. IGF-I and GH post-receptor signaling mechanisms for pancreatic beta-cell replication. J Mol Endocrinol. 2000;24:303–311. doi: 10.1677/jme.0.0240303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Morozov A, et al. Rap1 couples cAMP signaling to a distinct pool of p42/44MAPK regulating excitability, synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory. Neuron. 2003;39:309–325. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00404-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rusanescu G, Qi H, Thomas SM, Brugge JS, Halegoua S. Calcium influx induces neurite growth through a Src-Ras signaling cassette. Neuron. 1995;15:1415–1425. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90019-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dolmetsch RE, Pajvani U, Fife K, Spotts JM, Greenberg ME. Signaling to the nucleus by an L-type calcium channel–calmodulin complex through the MAP kinase pathway. Science. 2001;294:333–339. doi: 10.1126/science.1063395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chan GC, Tonegawa S, Storm DR. Hippocampal neurons express a calcineurin-activated adenylyl cyclase. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9913–9918. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2376-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Vaillant AR, et al. Depolarization and neurotrophins converge on the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt pathway to synergistically regulate neuronal survival. J Cell Biol. 1999;146:955–966. doi: 10.1083/jcb.146.5.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wu TW, Wang JM, Chen S, Brinton RD. 17Beta-estradiol induced Ca2+ influx via L-type calcium channels activates the Src/ERK/cyclic-AMP response element binding protein signal pathway and BCL-2 expression in rat hippocampal neurons: A potential initiation mechanism for estrogen-induced neuroprotection. Neuroscience. 2005;135:59–72. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Perez E, et al. Neuroprotective effects of estratriene analogs: Structure–activity relationships and molecular optimization. Drug Dev Res. 2006;68:1–15. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Perez E, et al. Neuroprotective effects of an estratriene analog are estrogen receptor independent in vitro and in vivo. Brain Res. 2005;1038:216–222. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hell JW, et al. Identification and differential subcellular localization of the neuronal class C and class D L-type calcium channel alpha 1 subunits. J Cell Biol. 1993;123:949–962. doi: 10.1083/jcb.123.4.949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Davare MA, et al. A beta2 adrenergic receptor signaling complex assembled with the Ca2+ channel Cav1.2. Science. 2001;293:98–101. doi: 10.1126/science.293.5527.98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sinnegger-Brauns MJ, et al. Isoform-specific regulation of mood behavior and pancreatic beta cell and cardiovascular function by L-type Ca 2+ channels. J Clin Invest. 2004;113:1430–1439. doi: 10.1172/JCI20208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Magee JC, Johnston D. A synaptically controlled, associative signal for Hebbian plasticity in hippocampal neurons. Science. 1997;275:209–213. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5297.209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Golding NL, Staff NP, Spruston N. Dendritic spikes as a mechanism for cooperative long-term potentiation. Nature. 2002;418:326–331. doi: 10.1038/nature00854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nevian T, Sakmann B. Spine Ca2+ signaling in spike-timing-dependent plasticity. J Neurosci. 2006;26:11001–11013. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1749-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Peterson BZ, et al. Analysis of the dihydropyridine receptor site of L-type calcium channels by alanine-scanning mutagenesis. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:18752–18758. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.30.18752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thomas P, Pang Y, Filardo EJ, Dong J. Identity of an estrogen membrane receptor coupled to a G protein in human breast cancer cells. Endocrinology. 2005;146:624–632. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kamp TJ, Hell JW. Regulation of cardiac L-type calcium channels by protein kinase A and protein kinase C. Circ Res. 2000;87:1095–1102. doi: 10.1161/01.res.87.12.1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hudmon A, et al. CaMKII tethers to L-type Ca2+ channels, establishing a local and dedicated integrator of Ca2+ signals for facilitation. J Cell Biol. 2005;171:537–547. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200505155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Valverde MA, et al. Acute activation of Maxi-K channels (hSlo) by estradiol binding to the beta subunit. Science. 1999;285:1929–1931. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5435.1929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Keller M, et al. Agonist specific L-type Ca(2+)-current stimulation in ventricular myocytes by a novel steroid-like compound. Cell Calcium. 2006;39:425–433. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2006.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shaw SL, Quatrano RS. Polar localization of a dihydropyridine receptor on living Fucus zygotes. J Cell Sci. 1996;109(Pt 2):335–342. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109.2.335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Strubing C, Hering S, Glossmann H. Evidence for an external location of the dihydropyridine agonist receptor site on smooth muscle and skeletal muscle calcium channel. Br J Pharmacol. 1993;108:884–891. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1993.tb13482.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.He M, Bodi I, Mikala, Schwartz A. Motif III S5 of L-type calcium channels is involved in the dihydropyridine binding site. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:2629–2633. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.5.2629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dietrich T, et al. Effects of blood estrogen level on cortical activation patterns during cognitive activation as measured by functional MRI. NeuroImage. 2001;13:425–432. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Stevens MC, Clark VP, Prestwood KM. Low-dose estradiol alters brain activity. Psychiatry Res. 2005;139:199–217. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2005.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Luine VN, Jacome LF, Maclusky NJ. Rapid enhancement of visual and place memory by estrogens in rats. Endocrinology. 2003;144:2836–2844. doi: 10.1210/en.2003-0004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Daniel JM, Dohanich GP. Acetylcholine mediates the estrogen-induced increase in NMDA receptor binding in CA1 of the hippocampus and the associated improvement in working memory. J Neurosci. 2001;21:6949–6956. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-17-06949.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Singh M, Meyer EM, Millard WJ, Simpkins JW. Ovarian steroid deprivation results in a reversible learning impairment and compromised cholinergic function in female Sprague–Dawley rats. Brain Res. 1994;644:305–312. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91694-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wooley CS, McEwen BS. Estradiol mediates fluctuation in hippocampal synapse density during the estrous cycle in the adult rat. J Neurosci. 1992;12:2549–2554. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-07-02549.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chenjian Li, et al. Estrogen alters hippocampal dendritic spine shape and enhances synaptic protein immunoreactivity and spatial memory in female mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:2185–2190. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307313101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Adams MM, Fink SE, Janssen WGM, Shah RA, Morrison JH. Estrogen modulates synaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunit distribution in the aged hippocampus. J Comp Neurol. 2004;474:419–425. doi: 10.1002/cne.20148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Woolley CS, Weiland NG, McEwen BS, Schwartzkroin PA. Estradiol increases the sensitivity of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells to NMDA receptor-mediated synaptic input correlation with dendritic spine density. J Neurosci. 1997;17:1848–1859. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-05-01848.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Smith CC, McMahon LL. Estradiol-induced increase in the magnitude of long-term potentiation is prevented by blocking NR2B-containing receptors. J Neurosci. 2006;26:8517–8522. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5279-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ogiue-Ikeda M, et al. Rapid modulation of synaptic plasticity by estrogens as well as endocrine disrupters in hippocampal neurons. Brain Res Rev. 2007 doi: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liu F, et al. Activation of estrogen receptor-β regulates hippocampal synaptic plasticity and improves memory. Nat Neurosci. 2008;11:334–342. doi: 10.1038/nn2057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Egrov AV, Hamam BN, Fransen E, Hasselmo ME, Alonso AA. Graded persistent activity in entorhinal cortex neorons. Nature. 2002;420:173–178. doi: 10.1038/nature01171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kiehn O, Eken T. Functional role of plateau potentials in vertebrate motor neurons. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998;8:746–752. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(98)80117-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fransen E, Tahvidari B, Egrov AA, Hasselmo ME, Alonso AA. Mechanism of graded persistent cellular activity of entorhinal cortex layer V neurons. Neuron. 2006;49:735–774. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sjostrom PJ, Nelson SB. Spike timing, calcium signals and synaptic plasticity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002;12:305–314. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00325-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bading H, Ginty DD, Greenberg ME. Regulation of gene expression in hippocampal neurons by distinct calcium signaling pathways. Science. 1993;260:181–186. doi: 10.1126/science.8097060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Moosmang S, et al. Role of hippocampal Cav1.2 Ca2+ channels in NMDA receptor-independent synaptic plasticity and spatial memory. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9883–9892. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1531-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Meredith MR, Holmgren CD, Weidum M, Burnashev N, Mansvelder HD. Increased threshold for spike-time-dependent plasticity is caused by unreliable calcium signaling in mice lacking Fragile X gene Fmr1. Neuron. 2007;54:627–638. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hamill OP, Marty A, Neher E, Sakmann B, Sigworth FJ. Improved patch-clamp techniques for high-resolution current recording from cells and cell-free membrane patches. Pflugers Arch. 1981;391:85–100. doi: 10.1007/BF00656997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






