Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2008 Oct 23;105(43):16413–16414. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809363105

Therapeutic correction of bacterial dysbiosis discovered by molecular techniques

R Balfour Sartor 1,1
PMCID: PMC2575433  PMID: 18948599

High-throughput, automated DNA-sequencing techniques have provided deeper understanding of the incredibly complex, largely uncultivatable microbiota populating the mammalian gastrointestinal tract in concentrations that outnumber mammalian cells by 10-fold (13). These molecular techniques identify component bacterial species by sequencing PCR-amplified products of primers that target highly conserved regions of the 16S rDNA subunit gene. Variation in these sequences is then used to phylogenetically represent genera and species (4). Alternatively, directly sequencing DNA of stool, luminal samples, or mucosal specimens can provide a metagenomic analysis of the structure and function of microbial communities and their interactions with the habitats that they occupy (Committee on Metagenomics, 2007) (4, 5). Meta genomic studies have led to the concept of a “superorganism” whose genome and metabolism are mutalistic aggregates of microbial and host components (6). Molecular analysis of fecal and mucosal samples have increased culture-based estimates of 200–300 individual colonic bacterial species to as high as 1,800 genera and 15,000–36,000 species (7). This remarkable diversity of intestinal bacteria is confined largely (99%) to 4 phyla: Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria, with the dominant Firmicutes (64% of mucosally associated colonic species) primarily composed of Clostridium XIVa and IV groups (7). Key advances in recognizing the impact of intestinal microbiota on human diseases were provided by recent observations that the relative proportions of these phyla are altered in obesity (3), inflammatory bowel diseases (7), and experimental type 1 diabetes (8). Expansion of Firmicutes and contraction of Bacteroidetes occurs in obesity (3, 5), whereas diabetic mice have a reduced Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio (8) and a subset of Crohn disease patients and ulcerative colitis exhibit impressive contraction of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes with concomitant relative expansion of Proteobacteria (7). Functional relevance of these observations is provided by the onset of fat accumulation and weight gain in germ-free lean mice colonized with fecal microbiota of obese mice (5) and attenuated diabetes in NOD murine recipients colonized with bacteria from nondiabetic mice (8). A number of investigators have reported decreased diversity of fecal microbiota in human Crohn disease (9), with specific decreases in the Clostridium XIVa and IV groups, including the Clostridium leptum group (7, 10). Further analysis demonstrated a selective decrease in Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, a predominant member of the C. leptum group, in mucosal biopsies of Crohn disease patients (11). In this issue of PNAS, these observations have been extended by Sokol et al. (12), who report that a low population of mucosally associated F. prausnitzii at the time of ileal resection predicts recurrence of Crohn disease, that a secreted product of this bacterial species exhibited immunomodulatory activity in vitro, and that oral administration of this organism or its supernatant reduced severity of acute experimental colitis in mice.

Several novel features of this study have important pathophysiologic and clinical implications for Crohn disease, a relapsing chronic inflammatory disorder that appears to be caused by overly aggressive T cell responses directed against a subset of commensal bacteria that inhabit the distal ileum and colon of genetically susceptible hosts (9, 13). Extensive investigations in gnotobiotic rodents demonstrate an essential role for enteric microbiota in chronic TH1/TH17-mediated experimental colitis with host and bacterial species specificity (9, 14). Selective colonization of germ-free (sterile) rodents with several enteric bacterial species induces chronic colitis and antigen-specific TH1/TH17 responses (Table 1). In contrast, other bacterial species, primarily exogenously administered probiotic agents either alone or in combination, treat experimental colitis and prevent relapse of ulcerative colitis or inflammation in ileal reservoirs (pouchitis) created after colectomy for ulcerative colitis (9). This raises the possibility that a disturbed balance of beneficial and detrimental bacteria (dysbiosis) could promote intestinal inflammation, including Crohn disease, and that therapeutically manipulating microbial composition and function by antibiotics, probiotics, and/or prebiotics could restore mucosal homeostasis (9, 15). Sokol et al. (12) uniquely demonstrate that a commensal enteric bacterial species identified to be decreased in Crohn disease patients by molecular techniques (11) has functional in vitro and in vivo protective effects, with dominant protective activities mediated by a yet-to-be-defined secreted product(s). These in vitro effects include preferential induction of IL-10, a protective cytokine, with minimal expression of proinflammatory IL-12 and IFN-γ by peripheral blood mononuclear cells exposed to the intact bacteria. The supernatant, but not intact viable bacteria, suppressed constitutive and IL-1β-induced IL-8 secretion and NFκB activation in cultured Caco-2 colonic epithelial cells in vitro. Oral administration of either culture supernatant or viable F. prausnitzii attenuated acute (2 day) trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS)-induced colitis and decreased colonic TNF and IL-12 production while stimulating IL-10. Activity within the intestinal lumen was not required, because i.p. delivered bacteria or supernatant were effective over 20 days of administration. This systemic effect of bacterial products is similar to parenteral treatment of experimental colitis with the toll-like receptor (TLR)-9 agonist, CpG, through induction of IFNα/β production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells (16).

Table 1.

Balance of beneficial vs. detrimental commensal enteric bacterial species helps determine intestinal homeostasis vs. inflammation

Potentially injurious species in susceptible hosts Protective species
Bacteroides vulgatus, B. thetaiotaomicron Lactobacillus species
Escherichia coli (adherent/invasive) Bifidobacterium species
Enterococcus faecalis (nonpathogenic) Escherichia coli
Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron
Fusobacterium varium Faecalibacterium prausnitzii
Helicobacter hepaticus and other intestinal species
Bifidobacterium animalis

The biologically active protective molecule secreted by F. prausnitzii was not identified, but was shown not to be butyrate, which is actively produced by members of the Clostridium XIVa and IV groups (7), and to lack direct microbiocidal function by in vitro assays. Several groups have likewise demonstrated immunoregulatory protective effects of products secreted by common probiotic Lactobacillus species (17, 18). Yan et al. (18) purified 40- and 75-kDa proteins secreted by Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG that have epithelial homeostatic responses mediated through AKT. It will be important to characterize the immunosuppressive molecule(s) secreted by F. prausnitzii and establish its mechanism(s) of action, including possible mediation by IL-10. Part of this characterization will need to verify that these protective effects are not due in part to residual effects of culture media used to grow F. prausnitzii, because the sterile culture media alone had modest in vivo protective effects, with no significant difference between media and bacterial culture supernatant in most readouts of clinical disease activity (12). Unfortunately, a media control was not included in the 20-day survival study (figure 7 of the study).

The observation that patients who developed endoscopic evidence of recurrent mucosal ulceration in the neoterminal ileum had lower mucosal concentrations of F. prausnitzii at the time of surgery compared with these subjects who did not develop recurrent ulceration could have important clinical implications, if replicated in a larger independent population. Persistently low mucosal Firmicutes (Clostridium coccoides and F. prausnitzii) concentrations persisted for 6 months in relapsing patients, raising the provocative possibility that exogenous administration of F. prausnitzii could restore normal levels of Firmicutes and prevent the onset of recurrent disease, as was seen with therapeutic oral administration of F. prausnitzii in the murine colitis model. Discovering low mucosal concentrations of F. prausnitzii at resection could target a high-risk population that may respond to prophylactic therapy with either established immunosuppressive agents, or perhaps more mechanistically, by F. prausnitzii administration. This could be particularly important in light of the poor therapeutic response of traditional probiotic bacterial formulations in Crohn disease (9, 15). Thus, this study opens possible new therapeutic paradigms in Crohn disease and other diseases driven by commensal microbiota. It raises the realistic hope of clinical use of molecular diagnostic techniques to identify altered microbial composition in an individual, then reversing the observed dysbiosis by selectively restoring missing protective bacterial species and/or eliminating detrimental organisms. It remains to be determined whether orally administered F. prausnitzii or its purified secreted biologically active immunosuppressive product will have greater therapeutic benefit to patients with low mucosal F. prausnitzii concentrations, compared with those patients with normal levels of this common mucosal species. It is also extremely important to determine whether low mucosal concentrations of F. prausnitzii at resection will predict postoperative recurrence in a broad population of patients.

A disturbed balance of beneficial and detrimental bacteria (dysbiosis) could promote intestinal inflammation.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement: R.B.S. is on the advisory board of Dannon/Yakult.

See companion article on page 16731.

References

  • 1.Eckburg PB, et al. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science. 2005;308:1635–1638. doi: 10.1126/science.1110591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ley RE, et al. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science. 2008;320:1647–1651. doi: 10.1126/science.1155725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ley RE, Turnbaugh PJ, Klein S, Gordon JI. Microbial ecology: Human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature. 2006;444:1022–1023. doi: 10.1038/4441022a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Peterson DA, Frank DN, Pace NR, Gordon JI. Metagenomic approaches for defining the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;3:417–427. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Turnbaugh PJ, et al. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature. 2006;444:1027–1031. doi: 10.1038/nature05414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gill SR, et al. Metagenomic analysis of the human distal gut microbiome. Science. 2006;312:1355–1359. doi: 10.1126/science.1124234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Frank DN, et al. Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:13780–13785. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0706625104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wen L, et al. Innate immunity and intestinal microbiota in the development of Type 1 diabetes. Nature. 2008 Sep 21; doi: 10.1038/nature07336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sartor RB. Microbial influences in inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:577–594. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.11.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Manichanh C, et al. Reduced diversity of faecal microbiota in Crohn's disease revealed by a metagenomic approach. Gut. 2006;55:205–211. doi: 10.1136/gut.2005.073817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Martinez-Medina M, Aldeguer X, Gonzalez-Huix F, Acero D, Garcia-gil J. Abnormal microbiota composition in the ileocolonic mucosa of Crohn's disease patients as revealed by polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2006;12:1136–1145. doi: 10.1097/01.mib.0000235828.09305.0c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sokol H, et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is an anti-inflammatory commensal bacterium identified by gut microbiota analysis of Crohn disease patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008:16731–16736. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804812105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xavier RJ, Podolsky DK. Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2007;448:427–434. doi: 10.1038/nature06005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim SC, et al. Variable phenotypes of enterocolitis in interleukin 10-deficient mice monoassociated with two different commensal bacteria. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:891–906. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sheil B, Shanahan F, O'Mahony L. Probiotic effects on inflammatory bowel disease. J Nutr. 2007;137:819S–824S. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.3.819S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Katakura K, et al. Toll-like receptor 9-induced type I IFN protects mice from experimental colitis. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:695–702. doi: 10.1172/JCI22996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lin YP, Thibodeaux CH, Pena JA, Ferry GD, Versalovic J. Probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri suppress proinflammatory cytokines via c-Jun. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008;14:1068–1083. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yan F, et al. Soluble proteins produced by probiotic bacteria regulate intestinal epithelial cell survival and growth. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:562–575. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES