Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2008 Nov 7;283(45):30766–30771. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805353200

Entrapment of Carbon Dioxide in the Active Site of Carbonic Anhydrase II*,

John F Domsic ‡,1, Balendu Sankara Avvaru ‡,1, Chae Un Kim §, Sol M Gruner §,¶, Mavis Agbandje-McKenna , David N Silverman ‡,∥, Robert McKenna ‡,2
PMCID: PMC2576554  PMID: 18768466

Abstract

The visualization at near atomic resolution of transient substrates in the active site of enzymes is fundamental to fully understanding their mechanism of action. Here we show the application of using CO2-pressurized, cryo-cooled crystals to capture the first step of CO2 hydration catalyzed by the zinc-metalloenzyme human carbonic anhydrase II, the binding of substrate CO2, for both the holo and the apo (without zinc) enzyme to 1.1Å resolution. Until now, the feasibility of such a study was thought to be technically too challenging because of the low solubility of CO2 and the fast turnover to bicarbonate by the enzyme (Liang, J. Y., and Lipscomb, W. N. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 3675–3679). These structures provide insight into the long hypothesized binding of CO2 in a hydrophobic pocket at the active site and demonstrate that the zinc does not play a critical role in the binding or orientation of CO2. This method may also have a much broader implication for the study of other enzymes for which CO2 is a substrate or product and for the capturing of transient substrates and revealing hydrophobic pockets in proteins.


Since their discovery (2), the carbonic anhydrases (CAs)3 have been extensively studied because of their important physiological functions in all kingdoms of life (3). This family of enzymes is broadly comprised of three well studied, structurally distinct families (α, β, and γ) of mostly zinc-metalloenzymes that catalyze the reversible hydration of CO2 to bicarbonate (3, 4). More recently there have been other more distinct CAs characterized, such as a cadmium β class-mimic CA (5). However, all appear to share the same overall catalytic mechanism composed of two independent stages, shown in Equations 1 and 2, an example of a ping-pong mechanism (6, 7). In the hydration direction, the first stage is the conversion of CO2 into bicarbonate via a nucleophilic attack on CO2 by the reactive zinc-bound hydroxide. The resultant bicarbonate is then displaced from the zinc by a water molecule (Reaction 1).

graphic file with name M1.gif REACTION 1

The second stage is the transfer of a proton from the zinc-bound water to bulk solvent to regenerate the zinc-bound hydroxide (Reaction 2). Here B is a proton acceptor in solution or a residue of the enzyme itself.

graphic file with name M2.gif REACTION 2

For hCAII (α class CA), this reaction is facilitated by a solvent molecule with a pKa near 7 that is directly coordinated to the zinc (6). This centrally located zinc exhibits a tetrahedral configuration with three histidines (His-94, His-96, and His-119) and either a water or a hydroxide molecule. The active site cavity can be loosely described as being conical in shape having a 15 Å diameter entrance that tapers into the center of the enzyme. The cavity is partitioned into two very different environments. On one side of the zinc, deep within the active site, lies a cluster of hydrophobic amino acids (namely Val-121, Val-143, Leu-198, Thr-199-CH3, Val-207, and Trp-209), whereas on the other side of the zinc, leading out of the active site to the bulk solvent, the surface is lined with hydrophilic amino acids (namely Tyr-7, Asn-62, His-64, Asn-67, Thr-199-Oγ1, and Thr-200-Oγ1) (Fig. 1a).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

hCAII structure. a, overall view, showing the hydrophilic (magenta stick representation) and hydrophobic (green surface representation) sides of the active site. The active site zinc is shown in purple with the waters of the proton wire shown as small, red spheres. b and c, a close-up stereo view of the active site showing the position of bound CO2 in holo- (b) and apohCAII (c). Electron density of the active site amino acids and WI (σ-weighted 2Fo - Fc Fourier map contoured at 2.25 σ) and CO2 (σ-weighted Fo - Fc Fourier map contoured at 2.25 σ). The figure was created using PyMOL.

Previously, molecular dynamics studies have implied that the hydrophobic region of the active site sequesters the CO2 substrate and orients the carbon atom in readiness for nucleophilic attack by the zinc-bound hydroxide (Reaction 1) (1, 8). Additionally, crystallographic studies have identified an ordered water molecule, positioned near the hydrophobic pocket, termed “deep water,” WDW, that is stabilized by the amide nitrogen of Thr-199 and the zinc-bound hydroxide (Fig. 2a). It has been proposed that this water is likely displaced upon the infusion of CO2 into the binding pocket (8, 9). The hydrophilic wall of the active site has been shown, by x-ray crystallography, to create a well ordered hydrogen-bonded solvent network. It is hypothesized that this network is required to permit the transfer of a proton from the zinc-bound water to the bulk solvent via the experimentally identified proton shuttling residue His-64 (Reaction 2) (1013). Taken together, these two very different active site environments permit the sustained and rapid catalytic cycling of CO2 to bicarbonate.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Second CO2 binding site. a, surface representation showing the separation of the active site (green) and non-catalytic (pink) CO2 binding pockets. b, close-up view of the CO2 binding. Note the conformational change in Phe-226 (red = unbound, green = CO2-bound holohCAII). The electron density is a σ-weighted 2Fo - Fc Fourier map contoured at 1.5 σ. The figure was created using PyMOL.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Protein Purification and Crystallization—hCAII was expressed in a recombinant strain of Eshcherichia coli (BL21(DE3)pLysS) containing a plasmid encoding the hCAII gene (14). Purification was carried out via affinity chromatography as described previously (15). Briefly, cells were enzymatically lysed with hen egg white lysozyme, and the lysate was placed onto an agarose resin coupled with p-(aminomethyl)-benzene-sulfonamide, an hCAII inhibitor. The protein was eluted with 0.4 m sodium azide, 100 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, and the azide was removed by extensive buffer exchanging against 10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 8.0.

Preparation of Apoenzyme—The zinc from the holoenzyme was removed by incubation at 20 °C in the chelation buffer (100 mm pyridine 2,6 dicarboxylic acid, 25 mm MOPS; pH 7.0) for 8 h. The enzyme was then buffer-exchanged against 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, to remove the chelating agent (16). The complete loss of enzyme activity was verified through kinetic studies. The enzyme activity was revived through the addition of 1 mm ZnCl2, attributing the loss of activity to the absence of zinc rather than to the denaturation of the enzyme.

Crystallization and X-ray Data Collection—Crystals of holo- and apohCAII were obtained using the hanging drop vapor diffusion method (17). 10-μl drops of equal amounts of protein and precipitant were equilibrated against precipitant solution (1.3 m sodium citrate, 100 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.8) by vapor diffusion at room temperature (∼20 °C) (13). Crystals grew to ∼0.2 × 0.2 × 0.5 mm in size after ∼5 days.

CO2 Binding—To capture CO2 in the active site of hCAII, it was essential to cryo-cool the crystals under CO2 pressure. This was achieved using the high pressure cryo-cooling method that was originally developed for crystal cryoprotection (18). The crystals were first soaked in a cryo-solution containing 20% glycerol in precipitant solution. The crystals were then coated with mineral oil to prevent crystal dehydration and loaded into the bottom of high pressure tubes. In the pressure tubes, the crystals were pressurized with CO2 gas at 15 atm at room temperature. 25 min later, without releasing CO2 gas, the crystals were slowly frozen over 2 min by dipping the sealed end of the pressure tubes into liquid nitrogen. During the cooling process, it was noticed that the CO2 gas pressure gradually dropped from 15 atm to below 1 atm due to CO2 solidification.

X-ray Diffraction Data Collection—Diffraction data were collected at CHESS, beamline A1, at a wavelength of 0.9772 Å. Data were collected using the oscillation method in intervals of 1° step on an ADSC Quantum 210 CCD detector (Area Detector Systems Corp.), with a crystal to detector distance of 65 mm. A total of 624 and 360 images were collected for the holo and apo data, respectively. Indexing, integration, and scaling were performed using HKL2000 (19). The crystals of the CO2-bound holo- and apohCAII diffracted to 1.1 Å resolution and were processed to a completeness of 99.9% and an Rsym of 8.8% and a completeness of 93.1% and an Rsym of 8.0%, respectively. Complete processing statistics are given in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Data and refinement statistics for CO2-bound holo- and apohCAII

Holo Apo
Data collection
   Space group P 21 P 21
   Cell dimensions
      a, b, c (Å) 42.4, 41.5, 72.4 42.2, 41.5, 72.3
      α, β, γ (°) 90.0, 104.1, 90.0 90.0, 104.2, 90.0
   Resolution (Å) 20-1.1 (1.12-1.10)a 20-1.1 (1.12-1.10)
   Rsymb (%) 8.8 (51.9) 8.0 (50.6)
   I/σ(I) 21.0 (4.1) 35.6 (4.25)
   Completeness (%) 99.9 (100.0) 93.1 (89.7)
   Redundancy 11.4 (10.8) 7.0 (5.8)
Refinement
   No. Reflections 98,494 86,919
   Rfactorc/Rfreed (%) 10.90/12.89 10.35/13.87
   No. atoms
      Protein 2096 2121
      Zinc/CO2/glycerol 1/6/12 0/6/6
      Water 404 352
   B-factors (Å2)
      Protein (main/side) 10.4/15.2 11.1/15.6
      Zinc/CO2e/glycerol 5.1/14.0, 39.5/20.1 NA/15.7, 59.7/19.1
      Water 31.7 29.4
   Ramachandran Plot (%)
      Allowed 89.4 88.9
      Additionally allowed 10.2 10.6
      Generously allowed 0.5 0.5
   r.m.s.d.f 0.192 0.144
a

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell

b

Rsym = (Σ|I – 〈I〉|/Σ〈I〉) × 100

c

Rfactor = (Σ|Fo| – |Fc|/Σ|Fobs|) × 100

d

Rfree is calculated the same as Rfactor, except it uses 5% of reflection data omitted from refinement

e

The first number given is the average B-factor for the active site-bound CO2, the second is for the CO2 bound near Phe-226

f

The root mean square deviation of Cα positions as compared with the 1.1 Å resolution crystal structure of unbound holo hCAII (PDB ID: 2ILI) (13)

Structure Solution and Model Refinement—The structures of CO2-bound holo- and apohCAII were solved in a similar manner using the program SHELXL (20). Prior to refinement, a random 5% of the data were flagged for Rfree analysis (21). The previously determined 1.54 Å resolution crystal structure of holohCAII (PDB ID: 2CBA) (16) was stripped of all waters, the zinc, and any alternate conformers and used as the initial phasing model in a round of least squares, rigid-body refinement to 2.5 Å resolution to an Rfactor/Rfree of 31.3/33.2% for holo and 28.0/28.6% for apo enzyme. The data were then extended to 1.5 Å resolution, and the model was refined using conjugant gradient least squares refinement. After 20 cycles, the model and related σ-weighted electron density maps were read into the molecular graphics program Coot (22). Improperly built side chains and the zinc (in the holo structure only) were placed into their respective density, and the model was run through another round of conjugant gradient least squares refinement. Waters with positive density in the σ-weighted difference map were kept until all waters with reasonable density were built. The data sets were then extended to 1.1 Å resolution, and the final waters were built. Disorder was then modeled into the density by modeling all visible alternate conformations for both amino acid side chains and waters. Riding hydrogens were then placed on all residues except the imidazole nitrogens of the histidines. The weighting factor was then changed to 0.2 for one round followed by the use of all data for the final round. The final Rfinal/Rfree for holo was 10.9/12.9%, and the final Rfinal/Rfree for apo was 10.4/13.9%. Complete refinement statistics can be found in Table 1. The model geometries and statistics were analyzed by PROCHECK (23).

Additional Structural Features—There were no major changes in any amino acid atomic positions other than that mentioned for the phenyl ring of Phe-226 (due to CO2 binding) (Fig. 2). There were a large number of dual amino acid conformations in these structures; however, this can be attributed to the near atomic resolution of the structure and not necessarily to the pressurized environment that the crystals experienced (the alternate conformations were Ile-22, Leu-47, Ser-50, Asp-52, His-64, Ser-152, Ser-217, and Val-223 for the holo, and Ile-22, His-64, Gln-103, Asp-162, Lys-172, Glu-214, Ser-217, and Val-223 for the apo structure). Many previous structural studies of hCAII have shown that His-64 occupies two conformations, termed “in” and “out.” Generally it has been seen that the “in” conformation is favored, although there may be pH effects on the ratio of “in” to “out” (10, 13). In both the holoCO2-bound and the apoCO2-bound structures, His-64 was seen to have a preference for the “out” conformation. Due to the presence of glycerol as a cryo-protectant, a well ordered glycerol molecule was observed at the mouth of the active site cavity. The oxygens of the glycerol overlap with the positions of the waters of the proton wire, thus indicating that the glycerol might be binding advantageously due to the “out” prevalence of His-64. Interestingly this glycerol molecule is seen only in the holo enzyme. A second molecule of glycerol is seen in the same position in both the holo and the apo structures on the surface of the protein located near residues 243–245 (Fig. 3).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Glycerol binding sites in CO2-bound hCAII structures. a, ordered glycerol molecule located at mouth of the active site in the holo enzyme. b and c, second ordered glycerol observed bound on the surface of the holo (b) and apo (c) structures. The electron density maps are 2Fo - Fc Fourier map contoured at 1.0 σ. The figure was made using PyMOL.

RESULTS

Here we describe for the first time, to our knowledge, the experimental capture of CO2 in the hydrophobic cavity of hCAII (Fig. 1). The holo- and apohCAII CO2-bound structures were refined to 1.1 Å resolution with final Rfactors of 10.90 and 10.35, respectively (Table 1). Both exhibited only minor structural perturbations when compared with the holo unbound structure (PDB ID: 2ILI) (13), with Cα r.m.s.d.s of 0.21 and 0.15 Å, respectively. The active site-bound CO2 molecules for both the holo- and the apohCAII structures were clearly seen in the initial Fo - Fc electron density maps, on the hydrophobic face of the active site, positioned within 4 Å of residues Val-121, Val-143, Leu-198, and Trp-209 (Figs. 1 and 2, Table 2) and were refined, assuming full occupancy, and had final B-factors of 14.0 and 15.2 Å2 (comparable with the protein), respectively (Table 1).

TABLE 2.

Distance (Å) geometry of CO2 for holo- and apohCAII The bond distances from the CO2 molecule are given within a radial shell of 3.9 Å. The atoms of the CO2 molecule are in bold text. The numbering of the CO2 oxygens are in accordance to the text and figures.

Holo Apo
Zinc-bound OH/H2O–C 2.8
*H2O–Ca 2.9
Zinc-bound OH/H2O–O(1) 3.0
*H2O–O(1) 3.1
Zinc-bound OH/H2O–O(2) 3.1
*H2O–O(2) 3.1
Zn+2–O(1) 3.2
Thr199(N)–O(2) 3.5 3.2
WI–O(2) 3.5 3.2
His119(Nδ1)–O(1) 3.4 3.5
Leu198(Cα)–O(2) 3.4 3.5
His94(Cε1)–O(1) 3.3 3.2
WI–C 3.6 3.2
His119(Cβ)–O(1) 3.5 3.6
Val121(Cγ2)–O(1) 3.5 3.4
Trp209(Cζ2)–O(2) 3.5 3.3
His94(N ε2)–O(1) 3.6 3.5
His119(C γ1)–O(1) 3.7 3.8
Leu198(Cδ2)–O(2) 3.7 4.1
Zn+2–C 3.7
Val143(C γ1)–O(1) 3.7 3.8
Trp209(Cη2)–C 3.9 3.9
Trp209(Cζ2)–C 3.9 3.9
a

The water molecule in the apo hCA II is in an equivalent position to that of zinc bound OH/H2O in the holo hCA II

Comparison of holo- and apoCO2-bound hCAII—The holohCAII structure shows, as modeled previously (1, 8), that one of the oxygens of the CO2, O(2), interacts (3.5 Å) with the amide of Thr-199, and in doing so, causes a displacement of the water molecule WDW, whereas the O(1) is positioned between the zinc and Val-121. This arrangement places both CO2 oxygens nearly equidistant from the oxygen of the zinc-bound solvent with distances of 3.0 and 3.1 Å, respectively, putting the carbon 2.8 Å from the zinc-bound solvent. This results in a side-on orientation of CO2 with the zinc-bound solvent, at a distance that is well suited for the nucleophilic attack to take place on the carbon by the lone pair electrons of the oxygen in the zinc-bound hydroxide (Table 2, Fig. 1b). Additionally, a new (or displaced) water molecule, WI, not previously observed in other holohCAII structures is seen to occupy a space between Thr-200-Oγ1 and the O(2) oxygen of CO2 (Figs. 1, b and c, and 4).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Active site. a, superposition of unbound holo- (13), CO2-bound holo-, and bicarbonate-bound T200H hCAII (32). The binding modes of both the CO2 substrate and the Inline graphic product are similar, with the substrate favoring the hydrophobic side (green) and product favoring the hydrophilic side (orange). Note that the deep water (WDW, gray sphere) is displaced and a new water occupies the area between the side chain of Thr-200 and CO2 (WI, cyan) upon CO2 binding. The CO2 is orientated so that the carbon is primed for the nucleophilic attack by the zinc-bound hydroxide (orange sphere). b, a superposition of the V143Y variant of hCAII (9, 27). Note that the side chain of Tyr-143 (white) acts as a steric block to the CO2 binding site. The figure was created using PyMOL.

Interestingly, the CO2 molecule in the apo enzyme shares a very similar geometry despite the absence of the zinc (Fig. 1c). A water is positioned near what would have been the zinc-bound solvent in the holohCAII, although it is ∼0.6 Å closer to the histidine ligands. Both the CO2 oxygens are positioned ∼3.1 Å from this water molecule. The small shift of this water allows the CO2 to pivot about the O(1) atom, shifting O(2) into a slightly tighter interaction with the amide nitrogen of Thr-199 (3.15 Å for apo when compared with 3.5 Å for holohCAII) (Fig. 1, b and c).

Secondary CO2 Binding Site—In addition to the catalytic binding site, another CO2 binding site (not believed to be involved in catalysis) was observed in a second hydrophobic pocket, ∼11 Å away from the active site (Fig. 4a). In this pocket, the CO2 displaces the phenyl ring of Phe-226, inducing a 30° tilt with respect to the plane of the ring (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, this pocket lies next to Trp-97, a residue that biophysical analyses have shown acts as an initiator of proper folding of hCAII (24).

DISCUSSION

Catalysis of the hydration of CO2 by hCAII at 108 m-1 s-1 approaches the diffusion-controlled limit and follows Michaelis kinetics with a maximal turnover near 106 s-1 and Km near 10 mm. The diffused CO2 is expected to be loosely bound since it has no dipole moment, and the fact that CO2 is more soluble in organic solvents is consistent with the observed hydrophobic binding site, which suggests that solvation is a significant contributor to binding. The dissociation constant of CO2 at the active site of hCAII was estimated by infrared spectroscopy to be 100 mm (25), a value consistent with the kinetic properties of the catalysis. The constant of Henry's Law for the solubility of CO2 in water under the conditions of these experiments (15 atm CO2) indicates a maximal concentration of CO2 near 0.45 m (26). These considerations suggest a nearly complete occupancy of CO2 at the active site.

With an energy barrier for catalysis near 10 kcal/mol, an insignificant reaction rate is expected at liquid nitrogen temperature. However, in our procedure, CO2 was introduced to the crystal at room temperature, a procedure that surely decreased the effective pH of the crystal and surrounding solvent and promoted the formation of the zinc-bound water at the active site. The observation of CO2 at the active site is consistent with a zinc-bound water in our structures since this form would predominate at acidic pH and is unreactive toward CO2. The zinc-bound hydroxide form of the enzyme reacts with CO2; however, the observation of no bound bicarbonate suggests that this form of the enzyme was not prominent.

That the binding of CO2 does not involve first-shell coordination to the zinc is consistent with previous spectroscopic studies (27, 28). Moreover, the observed CO2 binding site confirms previous kinetic and structural analyses of mutations made at Val-143 (9, 29). From these studies, it was shown that bulkier substitutions led to significant decreases in activity. For example, a V143Y mutant had less than 0.02% the activity of the wild-type enzyme. A structural least squares superposition of V143Y with that of CO2-bound wild-type enzyme (Cα r.m.s.d. = 0.26 Å) clearly shows that the tyrosine would directly interfere with CO2 binding, thus blocking the substrate from binding in an orientation that is optimal for nucleophilic attack by the zinc-bound hydroxide (Fig. 2b).

The binding interactions of CO2 determined here are very similar to those of the isoelectronic NCO- ion that is a potent inhibitor of hCAII. Crystallographic analysis of the complex of NCO- and hCAII shows that cyanate is bound on the hydrophobic surface of the active-site cavity and does not displace the zinc-bound water (30). Moreover, like bound CO2, the cyanate ion displaces the deep water and forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone amide of Thr-199; the tetrahedral coordination about the zinc is not disturbed in the complex. The distance between the carbon of bound cyanate and the oxygen of zinc-bound water is 2.4 Å, again similar to the corresponding distance for bound CO2. This comparison of the binding of CO2 and the inhibitor NCO- supports our hypothesis that the observed binding site of CO2 (Fig. 1) is a site of productive substrate binding. It is interesting to note that in studies of Co(II)-substituted carbonic anhydrase, cyanate appears to bind directly to the zinc (31).

The observed binding site of CO2 aids in the interpretation of the next step of catalysis, the formation and subsequent release of the product, bicarbonate. Following the nucleophilic attack, two mechanisms have been proposed for the subsequent release of the Inline graphic ion based on the theoretical free energy calculations of CO2/Inline graphic intercoversion. The Lipscomb mechanism (32) propounds a monodentate Inline graphic intermediate wherein a proton rapidly migrates from the original Zn-OH- to one of the other two oxygen atoms of the Inline graphic ion. The zinc in this mechanism is held in a tetrahedral coordination (Fig. 5a). In contrast, the Lindskog mechanism (33) proposes a bidentate Zn-Inline graphic intermediate that requires one of the two oxygen atoms of the original CO2 molecule to coordinate directly with zinc, resulting in a penta-coordinated metal ion held in a trigonal bipyramidal geometry (Fig. 5b).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Proposed mechanisms of hCAII catalysis. a and b, Lipscomb (32) mechanism (a) and Lindskog (33) (b) mechanism.

In addition, physical evidence is provided by previous structural work. Xue et al. (34) made a T200H mutant that displayed a higher affinity for Inline graphic ion than the wild-type enzyme, and as a consequence, were able to capture bicarbonate in the active site and study the complex using x-ray crystallography (Figs. 2a and 4). Least squares superposition of this structure on the wild-type hCAII CO2-bound structure (Cα r.m.s.d. = 0.21 Å) shows that the CO2 substrate molecule exists in the same plane as the Zn-Inline graphic product (Fig. 2a). From a strictly structural perspective, the pseudo-bidentate nature of the captured Zn-Inline graphic complex seems to favor the Lindskog hypothesis. Nevertheless, in both mechanisms, the release of the Inline graphic product from the Zn-Inline graphic intermediate is associated with the binding of a water molecule to the metal. The appearance of the previously unseen water, WI, in close proximity to the zinc was observed in the CO2 complex structures of both the holo and the apo enzymes. This water could be either the displaced WDW water, seen prior to CO2 binding (Fig. 2a), or a new ordered water, possibly arising due to a change in the local electrostatic environment. The position of this water with respect to the zinc leads us to suggest that this water may be the best candidate in the aforementioned water-associated displacement of product bicarbonate (Figs. 2 and 6).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

Proposed catalytic mechanism of hCAII. A schematic representation of three discrete stages of the catalytic cycle is shown. a, unbound. Note the presence of deep water (WDW). b, CO2 bound. Note the displacement of WDW and the hydrogen bond between the substrate and backbone amide of Thr-199. c, the formation of bicarbonate. The figure was created using ChemDraw 11.0 (available from CambridgeSoft).

In summary, this method of using pressurized gases, such as CO2, may be applicable to other enzymes to capture weakly bound substrates and/or identify hydrophobic pockets in enzymes that might play important roles in substrate binding or protein folding. The identification of a CO2 binding site at the active site of hCAII, in combination with the previously known bicarbonate binding site and the location of ordered water molecules, WDW and WI, should now guide molecular dynamics studies to examine the catalytic event itself and decipher whether the Lipscomb (32) or Lindskog (33) mechanism is more feasible.

Supplementary Material

[Author Profile]

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Chingkuang Tu, Lakshmanan Govindasamy, and Arthur Robbins for insightful discussions.

The atomic coordinates and structure factors (codes 3D92, and 3D93) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ (http://www.rcsb.org/).

*

This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grant GM25154 (to D. N. S. and R. M.) and the MacCHESS grant (National Institutes of Health Grant RR001646). This work was also supported by grants from the Thomas Maren Foundation (to R. M.), U. S. Department of Energy Grant DE-FG02-97ER62443, and CHESS, which is supported by the U. S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health-NIGMS through NSF grant DMR-0225180. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

This article was selected as a Paper of the Week.

Footnotes

3

The abbreviations used are: CA, carbonic anhydrase; hCAII, human carbonic anhydrase II; MOPS, 3-(N-morpholino)-propanesulfonic acid; r.m.s.d., root mean square deviation; PDB, Protein Data Bank.

References

  • 1.Liang, J. Y., and Lipscomb, W. N. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87 3675-3679 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Davenport, H. W. (1984) Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 429 4-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chegwidden, W. R., Carter, N. D., and Edwards, Y. H. (2000). The Carbonic Anhydrases, New Horizons, Birkhauser Verlag Basel, Switzerland
  • 4.Christianson, D. W., and Fierke, C. A. (1996) Acc. Chem. Res. 29 331-339 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xu, Y., Feng, L., Jeffrey, P. D., Shi, Y., and Morel, F. M. (2008) Nature 452 56-61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lindskog, S. (1997) Pharmacol. Ther. 74 1-20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Silverman, D. N., and Lindskog, S. (1988) Acc. Chem. Res. 21 30-36 [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Merz, K. M., Jr. (1991) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113 406-411 [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fierke, C. A., Calderone, T. L., and Krebs, J. F. (1991) Biochemistry 30 11054-11063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Silverman, D. N., and McKenna, R. (2007) Acc. Chem. Res. 40 669-675 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roy, A., and Taraphder, S. (2007) J. Phys. Chem. Sect. B 111 10563-10576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tu, C. K., Silverman, D. N., Forsman, C., Jonsson, B. H., and Lindskog, S. (1989) Biochemistry 28 7913-7918 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fisher, S. Z., Maupin, C. M., Budayova-Spano, M., Govindasamy, L., Tu, C. K., Agbandje-McKenna, M., Silverman, D. N., Voth, G. A., and McKenna, R. (2007) Biochemistry 46 2930-2937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Forsman, C. A., Behravan, G., Osterman, A., and Jonsson, B. H. (1988) Acta Chem. Scand. B 42 314-318 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Khalifah, R. G., Strader, D. J., Bryant, S. H., and Gibson, S. M. (1977) Biochemistry 16 2241-2247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hakansson, K., Carlsson, M., Svensson, L. A., and Liljas, A. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 227 1192-1204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McPherson, A. (1982) Preparation and Analysis of Protein Crystals, 1st Ed., Wiley, New York
  • 18.Kim, C. U., Kapfer, R., and Gruner, S. M. (2005) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 61 881-890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Otwinowski, Z., and Minor, W. (1997) Methods Enzymol. 276 307-326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sheldrick, G. M. (2008) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 64 112-122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Brunger, A. T. (1992) Nature 355 472-475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Emsley, P., and Cowtan, K. (2004) Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60 2126-2132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S., and Thornton, J. M. (1993) J. Appl. Cryst. 26 283-291 [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jonasson, P., Aronsson, G., Carlsson, U., and Jonsson, B. H. (1997) 36 5142-5148 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 25.Krebs, J. F., Ippolito, J. A., Christianson, D. W., and Fierke, C. A. (1993) Biochemistry 32 4496-4505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Butler, J. N. (1982) Carbon Dioxide Equilibria and Their Applications, p. 15, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co, Reading, MA
  • 27.Bertini, I., Luchinat, C., Monnanni, R., Roelens, S., and Moratal, J. M. (1987) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109 7855-7856 [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Williams, T. J., and Henkens, R. W. (1985) Biochemistry 24 2459-2462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alexander, R. S., Nair, S. K., and Christianson, D. W. (1991) Biochemistry 30 11064-11072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lindahl, L., Svensson, L. A., and Liljas, A. (1993) Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinformat. 15 177-182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bertini, I., Luchinat, C., Pierattelli, R., and Vila, A. J. (1992) Inorg. Chem. 31 3975-3979 [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liang, J. Y., and Lipscomb, W. N. (1987) Biochemistry 26 5293-5301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lindskog, S. (1983) in Zinc Enzymes (Spiro, T. G., ed) pp. 78-121, John Wiley and Sons
  • 34.Xue, Y., Liljas, A., Jonsson, B. H., and Lindskog, S. (1993) Proteins 15 80-87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Author Profile]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES