Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2008 Sep 17;46(11):3646–3652. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01202-08

Identities of Microbacterium spp. Encountered in Human Clinical Specimens

Kathrina Gneiding 1, Reinhard Frodl 1, Guido Funke 1,*
PMCID: PMC2576590  PMID: 18799696

Abstract

In the present study, 50 strains of yellow-pigmented gram-positive rods that had been isolated from human clinical specimens and collected over a 5-year period were further characterized by phenotypic and molecular genetic methods. All 50 strains belonged to the genus Microbacterium, and together they represented 18 different species. Microbacterium oxydans (n = 11), M. paraoxydans (n = 9), and M. foliorum (n = 7) represented more than half of the strains included in the present study. The isolation of strains belonging to M. hydrocarbonoxydans (n = 2), M. esteraromaticum (n = 1), M. oleivorans (n = 1), M. phyllosphaerae (n = 1), and M. thalassium (n = 1) from humans is reported for the first time. Microbacterium sp. strain VKM Ac-1389 (n = 1) and the previously uncultured Microbacterium sp. clone YJQ-29 (n = 1) probably represent new species. Comprehensive antimicrobial susceptibility data are given for the 50 Microbacterium isolates. This study is, so far, the largest on Microbacterium spp. encountered in human clinical specimens and outlines the heterogeneity of clinical Microbacterium strains.


Among the coryneform bacteria, the phenotypically and phylogenetically closely related genera Microbacterium and Aureobacterium have been united in the redefined genus Microbacterium (20). At present, the genus Microbacterium comprises 55 species (www.bacterio.cict.fr/m/microbacterium.html), all of which exhibit more or less yellow-pigmented gram-positive rods. Despite this large number of species, only in the mid-1990s was the presence of microbacteria in human clinical specimens recognized (7, 8, 11). Since then, only eight other reports on microbacteria have appeared in the relevant clinical microbiology literature (1, 2, 9, 12-16). The aim of the present study was to reveal the distribution of individual Microbacterium species in human clinical specimens by applying phenotypic and molecular genetic methods. Because no comprehensive data on the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Microbacterium spp. were available, we also determined the MICs of 10 antimicrobial agents against all 50 strains included in the present study. We observed that three species, namely, Microbacterium oxydans, M. paraoxydans, and M. foliorum, accounted for more than 50% of all strains included in the present study, but overall, 18 different taxa were encountered, indicating the heterogeneity of microbacteria isolated from clinical specimens.

(This paper is part of the medical doctoral thesis of K. Gneiding at the medical faculty of the University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains.

During a 5-year period, the 50 strains investigated in the present study were isolated in the routine clinical microbiology laboratories of Gärtner & Colleagues Laboratories, Ravensburg, Germany, or referred to the reference laboratory for coryneform bacteria at this institution by collaborating laboratories. None of the isolates had been included in any of our previous studies (7-9, 11). None of the patients were epidemiologically linked. The strains had been stored at −20°C in skim milk. For the investigations, strains were grown on Columbia sheep blood agar plates (BD, Heidelberg, Germany) and passaged twice on Columbia sheep blood agar at 35°C in ambient air before use.

Biochemical identification.

The techniques used have been described in detail previously (10). The commercial API Coryne and API ZYM kits (both from bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) were used according to the manufacturer's instructions, and reading was done after 48 h of incubation at 35°C for the API Coryne and after 4 h for the API ZYM system.

Molecular genetic investigations.

The 16S rRNA gene sequences were analyzed according to a published protocol (3). Almost complete (>1,400-bp) 16S rRNA gene sequences were determined for each clinical strain by aligning multiple overlapping sequences by use of the Lasergene 5 package (DNAStar Inc., Madison, WI). The 16S rRNA genes of the different Microbacterium species were aligned and compared by using the Web-based BLAST 2 Sequences software tool (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/bl2seq/wblast2.cgi).

Identification.

A strain was identified to the species level if its 16S rRNA gene sequence shared >98.70% base pair homology with the type strain or with other representative strains of a valid species (19) and if phenotypic testing did not indicate any aberrant reactions relative to the published data for this particular species.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

The CLSI standard for the determination and interpretation of antimicrobial MICs for Corynebacterium spp. (5) was applied. Briefly, by use of a broth microdilution method, bacterial cells with an inoculum equivalent to a 0.5 McFarland standard were grown in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with lysed horse blood and were incubated for as long as 48 h. MICs were read by two independent researchers.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

The GenBank accession numbers of the almost complete 16S rRNA gene sequences of all 50 clinical isolates included in the present study are given in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Strains included in the present study

Running no. Strain collection no. Patient's age (yr), sexa Clinical source Identification GenBank accession no.
1 1 31, f Knee puncture fluid M. paraoxydans EU714331
2 9 34, m Wound swab M. foliorum EU714380
3 58 45, f Urine M. paraoxydans EU714372
4 76 56, m Wound swab M. paraoxydans EU714377
5 118 74, f Gall bladder M. schleiferi EU714332
6 150 70, m Wound swab M. foliorum EU714333
7 297 8, m Throat swab M. oxydans EU714348
8 314 1, m Blood culture M. aurum EU714355
9 327 36, m Wound swab M. foliorum EU714358
10 331 65, f Prosthetic hip infection M. phyllosphaerae EU714359
11 332 55, f Blood culture M. trichothecenolyticum EU714360
12 343 5, f Urine M. testaceum EU714365
13 346 66, m Blood culture M. laevaniformans EU714366
14 407 25, f Superficial wound M. oxydans EU714369
15 428 79, m Pleural fluid M. paraoxydans EU714370
16 556 49, m Wound swab M. foliorum EU714371
17 591 39, m Blood culture M. paraoxydans EU714373
18 698 47, m Endophthalmitis M. oxydans EU714374
19 699 25, f Urine M. oxydans EU714375
20 720 74, f Pleural fluid M. foliorum EU714376
21 768 68, m Wound swab Microbacterium sp. strain VKM Ac-1389 EU714378
22 798 24, f Blood culture M. foliorum EU714379
23 985 18, m Blood culture M. oleivorans EU714381
24 2083 40, f Sinus aspirate M. oxydans EU714335
25 2121 5, m Superficial wound M. binotii EU714336
26 2122 59, m Blood culture M. esteraromaticum EU714337
27 2229 23, m Bone infection M. binotii EU714338
28 2345 54, m Dialysis fluid M. oxydans EU714339
29 2350 28, f Blood culture M. oxydans EU714340
30 2400 67, m Wound swab M. foliorum EU714341
31 2470 54, f Urine M. paraoxydans EU714342
32 2588 65, m Blood culture M. aurum EU714343
33 2704 41, m Lymph node M. oxydans EU714344
34 2761 45, f Wound swab Microbacterium sp. strain YJQ-29 EU714345
35 2833 54, f Blood culture M. lacticum EU714346
36 2841 8, m Wound swab M. oxydans EU714347
37 3043 29, f Blood culture M. oxydans EU714349
38 3047 NK, f Urine M. lacticum EU714350
39 3075 66, m Wound swab M. lacticum EU714351
40 3084 7, m Blood culture M. hydrocarbonoxydans EU714352
41 3109 35, m Tracheal secretion M. paraoxydans EU714353
42 3131 75, f Urine M. paraoxydans EU714354
43 3200 11, m Blood culture M. paraoxydans EU714356
44 3227 74, m Blood culture M. oxydans EU714357
45 3352 31, m Wound swab M. resistens EU714361
46 3370 60, m Blood culture M. trichothecenolyticum EU714362
47 3373 49, m Urethral swab M. thalassium EU714363
48 3388 51, f Conjunctival swab M. aurum EU714364
49 3502 42, f Blood culture M. testaceum EU714367
50 3517 45, f Catheter tip M. hydrocarbonoxydans EU714368
a

m, male; f, female; NK, not known.

RESULTS

Table 1 outlines the patients’ data as well as the identities of the 50 Microbacterium strains included in the present study. Twenty-nine patients were male and 21 female. The ages of the patients ranged from 1 to 79 years, with an average of 43.1 years. Sixteen strains came from blood cultures; 13 strains were isolated from wounds; 11 strains came from normally sterile anatomical sites or sterile materials; 6 strains came from urines; and 4 strains were isolated from miscellaneous materials.

The 50 strains were found to belong to 18 different taxa: M. oxydans (n = 11), M. paraoxydans (n = 9), M. foliorum (n = 7), M. aurum (n = 3), M. lacticum (n = 3), “M. binotii” (n = 2), M. hydrocarbonoxydans (n = 2), M. testaceum (n = 2), M. trichothecenolyticum (n = 2), M. esteraromaticum (n = 1), M. laevaniformans (n = 1), M. oleivorans (n = 1), M. phyllosphaerae (n = 1), M. resistens (n = 1), M. schleiferi (n = 1), M. thalassium (n = 1), Microbacterium sp. strain VKM Ac-1389 (n = 1), and the uncultured Microbacterium sp. clone YJQ-29 (n = 1). For all 50 strains, the 16S rRNA gene homology of the individual clinical strain with the type strain or another representative strain of the corresponding species ranged from 98.84% to 100%, with a mean homology of 99.60%.

The 16S rRNA gene homologies between all 55 Microbacterium species defined to date are given in Table 2. A total of 1,485 16S rRNA gene homologies were calculated. Two different clinically relevant Microbacterium species always shared less than 98.70% homology except for the species M. arborescens and M. imperiale (99.73% homology), M. oxydans and M. paraoxydans (99.25%), M. foliorum and M. phyllosphaerae (99.19%), M. lacticum and M. schleiferi (98.91%), M. foliorum and M. hydrocarbonoxydans (98.85%), M. hydrocarbonoxydans and M. oxydans (98.77%), M. oleivorans and M. phyllosphaerae (98.73%), M. hydrocarbonoxydans and M. phyllosphaerae (98.72%), and M. foliorum and M. oxydans (98.70%).

TABLE 2.

Percentages of 16S rRNA gene homologies of Microbacterium spp.

Species (GenBank accession no.) % 16S rRNA gene homology with:
M. aerolatum M. aoyamense M. aquimaris M. arabinogalactanolyticum M. arborescens M. aurantiacum M. aurum M. barkeri M. chocolatum M. deminutum M. dextranolyticum M. esteraromaticum M. flavescens M. flavum M. foliorum M. ginsengisoli M. gubbeenense M. halophilum M. halotolerans M. hatanonis M. hominis M. hydrocarbonoxydans M. imperiale M. indicum M. keratanolyticum M. ketosireducens M. kitamiense M. koreense M. lacticum M. lacus M. laevaniformans M. liquefaciens M. luteolum M. luticocti M. marinilacus M. maritypicum M. natoriense M. oleivorans M. oxydans M. paludicola M. paraoxydans M. phyllosphaerae M. pumilum M. resistens M. saperdae M. schleiferi M. sediminicola M. terrae M. terregens M. terricola M. testaceum M. thalassium M. trichothecenolyticum M. ulmi
Microbacterium aerolatum (AJ309929)
Microbacterium aoyamense (AB234028) 96.43
Microbacterium aquimaris (AM778449) 96.58 96.22
Microbacterium arabinogalactanolyticum (Y17228) 97.43 96.53 96.99
Microbacterium arborescens (X77443) 95.94 97.16 95.88 95.83
Microbacterium aurantiacum (AB004726) 96.37 96.54 96.72 96.65 95.44
Microbacterium aurum (Y17229) 96.09 98.89 95.81 96.17 96.67 96.39
Microbacterium barkeri (X77446) 95.51 94.19 95.05 96.16 96.19 95.03 93.81
Microbacterium chocolatum (AB004725) 95.93 95.75 96.06 96.21 95.12 98.42 95.92 94.5
Microbacterium deminutum (AB234026) 96.08 99.09 95.99 96.23 97 96.93 98.39 94.23 96.3
Microbacterium dextranolyticum (Y17230) 96.72 96.94 96.28 97.33 96.13 97.09 96.54 95.24 96.77 97.49
Microbacterium esteraromaticum (Y17231) 97.65 96.54 96.86 99.18 95.83 96.52 96.18 96.37 96.08 96.24 97.19
Microbacterium flavescens (Y17232) 96.58 96.68 96.5 97.13 96.39 97.34 96.33 95.44 96.84 97 97.82 97.13
Microbacterium flavum (AB286029) 97.43 98.75 96.35 96.56 97.04 96.88 98.34 94.58 96.21 98.4 97.38 96.56 96.83
Microbacterium foliorum (AJ249780) 98.53 97.37 97.14 97.4 96.67 97 97.15 95.38 96.24 97.08 96.68 97.27 96.74 97.24
Microbacterium ginsengisoli (AB271048) 94.73 97.23 94.77 94.67 98.55 95.01 96.49 95.46 94.36 97.21 95.48 94.67 95.66 97.08 95.53
Microbacterium gubbeenense (AF263563) 94.42 94.53 94.77 93.6 93.9 93.82 94.9 95.42 92.95 94.3 92.62 94.61 93.07 94.09 94.37 93.39
Microbacterium halophilum (AB004714) 95.22 94.95 97.14 95.97 95.38 95.58 94.64 94.77 95.08 95.33 95.66 95.84 96.4 95.05 95.55 94.17 92.76
Microbacterium halotolerans (AY376165) 95.02 94.27 95.12 95.4 93.87 95.3 93.93 94.55 94.14 94.44 94.97 95.34 95.29 94.73 95.02 92.97 94.29 93.93
Microbacterium hatanonis (AB274908) 95.59 97.23 95.96 96.01 96.51 95.66 96.93 94.95 94.61 97.01 96.39 96.02 96.31 97.23 96.59 96.65 93.18 95.16 94.03
Microbacterium hominis (AB004727) 96.93 96.81 96.65 96.84 97.06 97.15 96.38 95.57 96.61 97.07 97.63 96.7 98.02 97.22 96.82 95.83 93.42 96.36 94.93 96.35
Microbacterium hydrocarbonoxydans (AJ698726) 97.95 97.58 97 97.47 96.6 97.37 97.42 95.45 96.65 97.22 97.23 97.2 96.67 98 98.85 95.97 93.37 95.56 95.06 96.75 96.85
Microbacterium imperiale (X77442) 96.08 97.09 95.95 95.83 99.73 95.71 96.6 96.05 95.2 97 96.27 95.83 96.32 96.97 96.68 98.41 93.75 95.26 93.8 96.44 96.95 96.54
Microbacterium indicum (AM158907) 94.6 94.29 95.05 95.33 95.08 94.63 94.46 96.4 93.55 93.76 94.54 95.13 94.53 94.68 94.59 94.21 96.27 94.47 95.24 94.15 94.56 95.52 94.94
Microbacterium keratanolyticum (Y17233) 97.43 97.02 96.79 96.24 96.3 96.58 96.99 94.25 95.53 96.59 96.16 96.38 96.51 97.18 98.02 95.22 94.41 95.08 94.51 96.84 96.15 97.67 96.17 94.56
Microbacterium ketosireducens (AB004724) 97.08 96.39 96.74 98.44 96.1 97.73 96.1 96.04 97.02 96.95 97.73 97.59 98.09 96.67 97.03 94.97 93.38 96.32 95.76 95.83 97.45 97.17 96.11 94.77 96.18
Microbacterium kitamiense (AB013907) 96.51 96.68 96.86 96.92 95.92 99.39 96.88 95.31 98.17 97.07 97.43 96.79 97.62 96.83 97.29 95.21 94.06 95.62 95.41 96.02 97.21 97.59 96 94.97 97.2 97.73
Microbacterium koreense (AY962574) 96.39 98.32 96.86 96.1 96.66 96.31 98.05 93.96 95.52 97.83 96.16 95.9 96.24 98.18 97.08 96.1 94.69 94.96 94.3 95.97 96.31 97.43 96.59 94.71 96.45 96.25 96.38
Microbacterium lacticum (X77441) 96.58 98.62 96.44 96.51 96.94 96.53 98.44 94.15 96.09 98.26 96.95 96.52 96.67 98.55 97.36 96.84 93.97 95.19 94.07 96.86 96.81 97.76 96.95 94.25 96.99 96.39 96.88 98.05
Microbacterium lacus (AB286030) 96.22 99.45 96.09 96.4 97.04 96.79 98.99 94.09 95.62 98.95 96.71 96.41 96.49 98.61 97.53 97.12 94.69 94.86 94.41 97.54 96.72 97.75 96.97 94.62 97.58 96.24 97.27 98.05 98.35
Microbacterium laevaniformans (Y17234) 96.71 97.49 96.01 96.79 96.44 97.64 97.3 95.02 97.29 97.99 98.72 96.65 97.29 98.22 97.22 95.98 93.59 95.37 95.27 96.51 97.58 98.15 96.37 94.71 96.65 97.14 97.72 96.81 97.44 97.35
Microbacterium liquefaciens (X77444) 97.58 97.23 97 97.2 96.53 96.66 97.08 95.17 95.88 96.86 96.61 97.34 96.67 97.38 98.51 96.84 94.33 95.26 94.95 97.27 96.47 98.58 96.4 94.66 97.74 96.89 96.95 96.8 97.56 97.39 97
Microbacterium luteolum (Y17235) 96.73 96.75 96.79 97.06 96.24 96.51 96.72 95.01 95.74 96.38 96.64 97.2 96.51 96.97 98.29 95.09 94.09 95.09 94.79 96.84 96.36 98.36 96.1 94.42 98.02 96.6 96.79 96.38 96.99 96.89 97 98.97
Microbacterium luticocti (AM747814) 94.38 94.32 95.26 94.59 94.62 94.8 94.07 95.32 94.68 94.22 93.96 94.32 94.07 94.5 94.69 94.78 94.91 94.16 94.04 94.13 94.26 95.21 94.55 95.45 93.83 94.22 95.01 95 94 94.25 94.66 94.42 94.24
Microbacterium marinilacus (AB286020) 95.52 95.16 95.05 95.65 97.11 95.84 94.71 96.43 95.21 95.06 95.55 95.58 95.94 95.77 95.6 96.44 94.36 94.45 94.89 94.49 95.57 96.32 97.04 96.14 94.89 95.97 96.05 94.92 95.26 95.09 95.98 95.12 94.96 94.38
Microbacterium maritypicum (AB004728) 96.81 97.16 95.88 96.84 96.24 97.55 96.72 95.23 97.13 97.63 98.31 96.84 97.13 97.85 96.69 95.76 93.57 95.35 95.08 96.49 98.12 97.59 96.2 94.62 96.15 97.24 97.6 96.38 97.15 97.06 99 96.61 96.5 94.33 95.91
Microbacterium natoriense (AY566291) 97.87 97.19 97.18 97.54 96.83 97.19 96.84 95.5 96.68 96.9 97.11 97.26 97.11 97.47 98.66 95.57 93.01 93.01 95.02 96.49 97.11 98.45 96.83 94.74 97.61 97.59 97.33 96.91 97.33 97.04 97.93 97.75 97.61 94.39 95.99 97.11
Microbacterium oleivorans (AJ698725) 97.56 97.65 97.97 97.4 97.14 97.17 97.15 95.3 96.79 97.42 97.22 97.27 97.62 97.94 98.11 96.17 93.58 94.49 94.99 97.01 97.65 98.06 97.22 94.66 97.67 97.52 97.38 97.15 97.9 97.54 97.58 97.83 97.68 94.46 95.63 97.45 98.58
Microbacterium oxydans (Y17227) 97.8 97.44 97.2 97.4 96.72 96.86 96.72 95.35 96.09 97.07 96.92 97.54 96.93 97.59 98.7 95.78 94.49 93.58 95.13 97.46 96.66 98.77 96.59 94.77 97.95 97.1 97.14 97 97.61 97.58 97.22 99.66 99.18 94.59 95.3 96.8 97.96 98.02
Microbacterium paludicola (AJ853909) 94.94 95.25 94.84 95.25 97.53 95.03 97.53 96.37 94.51 94.94 94.8 95.06 95.27 95.59 95.63 96.35 94.78 94.78 94.22 94.86 95.05 98.36 97.25 95.94 95.11 95.37 95.41 95.05 95.07 95.03 95.65 95.21 95.04 94.48 98.6 95.47 96.07 95.73 95.39
Microbacterium paraoxydans (AJ491806) 98.4 97.23 97.56 97.74 96.66 96.96 96.66 95.92 96.35 97.01 97.08 98.02 97.13 97.59 98.5 95.76 95.28 94.53 95.08 97.31 96.96 98.65 96.6 95.18 97.6 97.38 97.18 96.66 97.41 97.14 97.57 99.05 98.84 95.08 95.77 97.24 98.24 98.38 99.25 95.82
Microbacterium phyllosphaerae (AJ277840) 98.24 97.3 97.14 97.81 97.01 97.28 97.01 95.78 96.65 96.93 97.35 97.68 97.41 97.45 99.19 95.66 93.3 93.3 95.57 96.86 97.63 98.72 96.88 95.36 98.15 97.73 97.69 97.01 97.49 97.46 97.43 98.37 98.22 94.35 96.22 97.36 98.73 98.73 98.56 95.84 98.3
Microbacterium pumilum (AB234027) 96.22 99.29 96.02 96.37 97.15 97.01 97.15 94.25 96.5 99.79 97.58 96.3 97.08 98.58 97.16 97.22 94.35 94.35 94.6 96.87 97.22 97.37 97.08 94.58 96.65 97.08 97.15 98.01 98.29 99.14 98.17 97.01 96.51 94.19 95.09 97.79 97.01 97.01 97.22 95.14 97.01 97.08
Microbacterium resistens (Y14699) 97.22 96.75 97.48 97.67 96.3 96.92 96.3 95.82 96.49 96.45 97.33 97.68 97.26 97.18 97.74 95.15 94.21 94.21 95.06 96.77 96.91 97.74 96.24 95.46 97.47 97.17 97.33 96.38 97.06 97.06 97.58 97.74 97.61 95.35 95.71 97.25 97.82 97.82 97.95 95.81 98.36 97.88 96.51
Microbacterium saperdae (Y17236) 97.36 96.89 96.79 96.86 96.33 96.46 96.33 94.77 95.67 96.59 96.34 97 96.46 97.17 98.03 95.19 94.25 94.25 94.54 97 96.32 98.1 96.19 94.26 98.15 96.46 96.68 96.59 97.08 97.08 97.15 98.78 99.11 94.15 94.79 96.46 97.47 97.47 99.04 94.86 98.5 97.96 96.73 97.61
Microbacterium schleiferi (Y17237) 96.86 98.89 96.92 96.65 97.74 96.92 97.74 94.73 96.42 98.53 97.46 96.79 97.33 98.62 97.61 97.23 93.85 93.85 94.24 97.32 97.25 98.02 97.74 94.42 97.33 96.88 97.19 98.4 98.91 96.61 97.79 97.67 97.33 94.24 95.65 97.46 97.82 97.82 97.88 95.82 97.67 97.88 98.57 97.26 97.47
Microbacterium sediminicola (AB286021) 96.01 96.4 95.53 95.71 98.28 96.86 98.28 95.88 95.76 96.17 96.1 95.72 96.56 96.53 96.36 97.74 95.32 95.32 94.43 95.87 96.53 96.86 98.21 95.66 96.27 95.96 97.22 95.83 96.5 96.98 96.48 95.88 95.72 94.93 97.82 96.47 96.41 96.41 96.06 97.14 96.27 96.91 96.23 96.26 95.75 96.75
Microbacterium terrae (AB004720) 96.23 95.71 96.46 97.06 95.42 96.72 95.42 95.22 96.35 96.37 97.45 96.79 97.81 95.94 96.31 94.26 93.17 93.17 94.79 95.13 96.7 96.38 95.42 94.01 95.83 98.58 96.99 95.55 95.76 95.76 96.94 96.1 96.31 94.04 95.17 96.5 96.77 96.77 96.31 97.47 96.58 96.85 96.44 96.37 95.97 96.3 95.23
Microbacterium terregens (AB004721) 96.3 98.95 96.03 96.45 96.87 96.11 96.87 94.24 95.51 98.6 96.39 96.24 96.39 98.32 97.16 97.01 94.45 94.45 93.84 96.95 96.6 97.36 96.8 93.96 96.59 98.46 96.11 97.71 98.13 98.13 97.04 96.95 96.45 94.05 95.21 96.74 96.91 96.91 97.14 95.27 96.95 97.08 98.86 96.45 96.6 98.26 96.04 95.34
Microbacterium terricola (AB234025) 96.58 97.23 96.69 96.87 96.93 96.73 96.93 94.85 96.03 98.33 97.08 96.87 97.08 97.98 97.43 96.72 94.61 94.61 93.98 97.64 96.59 97.71 96.93 94.67 97.08 96.45 96.87 97.83 97.98 97.98 97.34 97.63 97.22 94.63 95.76 97.21 97.26 97.26 97.84 95.79 97.77 97.42 98.36 97.71 97.43 98.4 96.66 95.89 98.32
Microbacterium testaceum (X77445) 97.65 97.02 97.76 97.74 96.67 97.75 96.67 95.98 97.18 96.72 97.48 97.74 97.62 97.32 97.76 95.46 94.29 94.29 95.16 97.13 97.47 97.89 96.8 95.22 97.4 97.45 98.03 96.73 97.21 97.21 97.51 98.03 97.88 94.97 96.43 97.54 97.96 97.96 98.22 95.84 98.64 98.3 96.79 98.5 97.83 97.54 96.91 96.72 96.6 97.84
Microbacterium thalassium (AB004713) 96.66 96.55 97.35 96.84 96.25 97.15 96.25 95.38 96.28 97.08 97.76 97.12 97.47 96.75 96.9 95.23 93.83 93.83 94.8 96.56 96.95 97.06 96.39 94.63 96.78 97.67 97.09 96.25 96.66 96.66 97.51 97.21 96.92 94.4 95.38 97.26 97.26 97.26 97.28 95.55 97.84 97.1 97.16 98.01 96.87 97.19 96 96.78 96.33 97.5 97.82
Microbacterium trichothecenolyticum (AB004722) 96.29 96.12 96.16 97.47 96.3 97.47 96.3 95.75 96.9 96.3 97.19 97.33 98.43 96.14 96.58 95.43 93.89 93.89 95.13 95.87 97.66 96.79 96.17 94.42 96.03 97.8 97.74 95.82 96.31 96.31 96.81 96.58 96.45 93.79 95.85 96.91 96.9 96.9 96.79 95.46 97.12 97.13 96.37 97.47 96.51 96.65 96.54 97.26 96.03 96.8 98.01 97.19
Microbacterium ulmi (AY062021) 95.31 95.93 95.81 95.83 97.76 95.22 97.76 95.78 94.86 95.76 95.61 95.57 95.72 95.95 96.22 96.78 94.59 94.59 94.07 95.62 96.36 95.92 97.76 95.17 95.22 95.54 95.52 95.83 95.6 95.6 96.3 95.47 95.29 95.28 96.66 96.07 96.28 96.28 95.65 96.52 96.12 96.08 95.81 95.76 95.26 95.9 97.15 94.95 95.91 95.76 96.27 95.38 95.7
Microbacterium xylanilyticum (AJ853908) 96.73 96.13 96.16 97.04 95.96 96.74 95.96 95.63 96.05 96.45 96.66 97.04 97.46 96.18 97.6 94.95 93.45 94.78 95.36 95.59 97.83 96.8 95.9 94.56 96.07 97.03 96.88 95.62 96.03 96.03 96.92 96.65 96.49 94.46 95.5 96.54 96.91 96.91 96.83 95.52 97.15 97.26 96.51 97.38 96.31 96.28 95.98 96.28 96.05 96.52 96.78 96.95 97.31 95.86

Table 3 shows the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Microbacterium spp. All 50 isolates were susceptible to linezolid and meropenem. Only strain 3352 was resistant to vancomycin, and only strain 985 was resistant to doxycycline. Ciprofloxacin had the weakest activity against microbacteria; 22% of the isolates were intermediately susceptible, and 22% were resistant.

TABLE 3.

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Microbacterium strains (n = 50)

Antimicrobial agent MIC (μg/ml)
No. (%) of isolates in the following category:
Range 50% 90% Susceptible Intermediate Resistant
Cefotaxime 0.06-4 0.5 4 36 (72) 9 (18) 5 (10)
Ciprofloxacin 0.25-32 1 8 28 (56) 11 (22) 11 (22)
Doxycycline ≤0.06->128 0.12 1 49 (98) 0 (0) 1 (2)
Erythromycin 0.03->32 0.12 1 42 (84) 5 (10) 3 (6)
Gentamicin 0.25-32 1 4 45 (90) 3 (6) 2 (4)
Linezolid 0.25-2 1 2 50 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Meropenem 0.06-4 1 4 50 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Penicillin 0.12-2 1 2 39 (78) 11 (22) 0 (0)
Rifampin ≤0.015-32 0.12 4 44 (88) 1 (2) 5 (10)
Vancomycin 0.25-16 0.5 2 49 (98) 0 (0) 1 (2)

DISCUSSION

From the work of Stackebrandt and Ebers, it has been clear that a cutoff of 98.7% 16S rRNA gene homology is appropriate for species differentiation within a genus (19). As is evident from Table 2, the genus Microbacterium is a very tight genus regarding the 16S rRNA gene homology between two valid species. However, applying the recommendations of Stackebrandt and Ebers, we were able to easily identify every Microbacterium strain included in the present study.

Of note is the molecular genetic differentiation between M. oxydans and M. paraoxydans, the two most frequently encountered species in the present study. Compared to the M. oxydans type strain sequence (GenBank accession no. Y17227 [18]), all nine M. paraoxydans strains from the present study showed the following nucleotide differences: at position 168, T instead of C; at position 177, T instead of A; at position 181, T instead of a deletion; at position 374, T instead of C; at position 555, C instead of G; at position 569, G instead of C; at position 588, G instead of N; and at position 1211, T instead of C. In general, we can confirm the data of Laffineur et al. (15) for the biochemical differentiation of M. oxydans and M. paraoxydans: in the present study, 9 of 11 M. oxydans strains expressed β-glucosidase activity (10 of 10 in reference 15), whereas all M. paraoxydans strains were negative in both studies. Another distinguishing reaction might be the strong pyrrolidonyl arylamidase activity detected in the present study for 8 of 11 M. oxydans strains, whereas weak activity was detected for 1 of 9 M. paraoxydans strains. The reason why M. oxydans and M. paraoxydans were the most frequently encountered species in our series is unclear but might be related to the distribution of these species in the environment.

In their important study of microbacteria, Laffineur et al. (15) observed that M. oxydans (9 of 30 strains) and M. paraoxydans (5 of 30 strains) were the microbacteria most frequently found in clinical specimens. These authors also detected M. aurum (4 of 30 strains), M. lacticum (4 of 30 strains), M. schleiferi (1 of 30 strains), and M. testaceum (1 of 30 strains), but only 1 of 30 strains was identified as M. foliorum, whereas in our study, 7 of 50 strains belonged to this species.

In the present study, we describe the second and third M. trichothecenolyticum strains from humans, whereas to date, only one strain had been isolated from clinical specimens and another from soil (16, 22). We report on the first two M. hydrocarbonoxydans strains and the first M. oleivorans strain from humans, whereas only one strain of M. hydrocarbonoxydans had been isolated from oil-contaminated soil and only one strain of M. oleivorans had been isolated from an oil storage cavern (17). M. esteraromaticum also has not been reported for humans but had been used as an aroma-producing bacterium (22), and M. thalassium had been isolated from soil (21). One M. laevaniformans strain (previously CDC group A-5 coryneform bacteria) isolated from blood had been described previously (7).

M. foliorum and M. phyllosphaerae cannot be distinguished phenotypically but were reported to share 12 differences in 1,480 bp (10 substitutions and 2 additional bases) of their 16S rRNA genes (4). All seven M. foliorum strains from the present study shared the following mismatches with the type strain of M. phyllosphaerae (AJ277840): at positions 45 to 47, CAG instead of GCC; at positions 49 and 50, GG instead of C and a deletion; at position 60, T instead of G; and at position 65, G instead of a deletion. The latter two Microbacterium species were isolated from phyllospheres and grasses and from decaying grasses of a litter layer (4). It is not unlikely that our patients acquired their M. foliorum and M. phyllosphaerae strains from grasses.

Strains 2121 and 2229 were identified as “Microbacterium binotii,” a taxon that has been proposed as a new species by D. Clermont, S. Diard, L. Motreff, C. Vivier, F. Bimet, C. Bouchier, M. Welker, W. Kallow, and C. Bizet (unpublished data) (GenBank accession no. EF567306) but has not been validated so far. Strain 768 is a member of a presently undescribed Microbacterium species of which strain VKM Ac-1389, isolated from an interacting plant and nematode (GenBank accession no. AB0402070), is a representative. Finally, strain 2761 is a representative of the uncultured Microbacterium sp. clone YJQ-29, which had been isolated from a hot spring (GenBank accession no. AY569297).

It should be noted that, except for M. resistens, M. hominis, M. paraoxydans, and “M. binotii,” all microbacteria were initially defined by strains that originated from the environment. It is not known at present whether microbacteria have a habitat in humans or are solely acquired from the environment.

The 50 Microbacterium isolates of our current series exhibited a level of susceptibility to penicillin (78%) similar to that of isolates reported in previous publications, about 80 to 90% of which showed susceptibility (7, 11). Interestingly, higher MICs for gentamicin (range, 1 to 64 μg/ml) were reported in previous studies of microbacteria (7, 11) than in the present study. The reason for this is unclear, but the different results might result from different MIC determination methods (microdilution in the present study versus agar dilution in the previous studies). The results of the present study correlated well with the antimicrobial MIC data obtained for six M. paraoxydans strains by use of Etest strips (15). In contrast to other coryneform bacteria and, in particular, other yellow-pigmented strains (6), for which rifampin usually has very low MICs, the MICs were slightly higher than usual (i.e., ≥0.12 μg/ml), although 88% of the Microbacterium strains were still fully susceptible. The present study reports only the third isolate of M. resistens, which shows the vancomycin resistance inherent in this species (9).

It is acknowledged that microbacteria are not frequently found as pathogens in human clinical specimens, as evidenced by the fact that just 50 isolates were collected in a reference center over a 5-year period.

Because of the heterogeneity of clinical isolates belonging to the genus Microbacterium, we strongly recommend to clinical microbiology laboratories that for yellow-pigmented gram-positive rods, of which Microbacterium is the most frequently encountered genus (6), almost-complete (i.e., >1,400-bp) 16S rRNA gene sequences should be determined in order to identify the strains, if indicated, to the species level, although the present study, together with the study of Laffineur et al. (15), indicates that M. oxydans and M. paraoxydans are the most frequently isolated microbacteria in human clinical specimens.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 17 September 2008.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Adderson, E. E., J. W. Boudreaux, and R. T. Hayden. 2008. Infections caused by coryneform bacteria in pediatric oncology patients. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 27136-141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Alonso-Echanove, J., S. S. Shah, A. J. Valenti, S. N. Dirrigl, L. A. Carson, M. J. Arduino, and W. R. Jarvis. 2001. Nosocomial outbreak of Microbacterium species bacteremia among cancer patients. J. Infect. Dis. 184754-760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Beck, M., R. Frodl, and G. Funke. 2008. Comprehensive study of strains previously designated Streptococcus bovis consecutively isolated from human blood cultures and emended description of Streptococcus gallolyticus and Streptococcus infantarius subsp. coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 462966-2972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Behrendt, U., A. Ulrich, and P. Schumann. 2001. Description of Microbacterium foliorum sp. nov. and Microbacterium phyllosphaerae sp. nov., isolated from the phyllosphere of grasses and the surface litter after mulching the sward, and reclassification of Aureobacterium resistens (Funke et al. 1998) as Microbacterium resistens comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 511267-1276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2006. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria. Document M45-A. CLSI, Wayne, PA. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Funke, G., and K. A. Bernard. 2007. Coryneform gram-positive rods, p. 485-514. In P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, J. H. Jorgensen, M. L. Landry, and M.A. Pfaller (ed.), Manual of clinical microbiology, 9th ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  • 7.Funke, G., E. Falsen, and C. Barreau. 1995. Primary identification of Microbacterium spp. encountered in clinical specimens as CDC coryneform group A-4 and A-5 bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33188-192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Funke, G., G. Haase, N. Schnitzler, N. Schrage, and R. R. Reinert. 1997. Endophthalmitis due to Microbacterium species: case report and review of mycobacterium infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24713-716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Funke, G., P. A. Lawson, F. S. Nolte, N. Weiss, and M. D. Collins. 1998. Aureobacterium resistens sp. nov., exhibiting vancomycin resistance and teicoplanin susceptibility. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 15889-93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Funke, G., G. Martinetti Lucchini, G. E. Pfyffer, M. Marchiani, and A. von Graevenitz. 1993. Characteristics of CDC group 1 and group 1-like coryneform bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 312907-2912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Funke, G., A. von Graevenitz, and N. Weiss. 1994. Primary identification of Aureobacterium spp. isolated from clinical specimens as “Corynebacterium aquaticum.” J. Clin. Microbiol. 322686-2691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Giammanco, G. M., S. Pignato, P. A. D. Grimont, F. Grimont, C. Santangelo, G. Leopardi, A. Giuffrida, V. Legname, and G. Giammanco. 2006. Interstitial pulmonary inflammation due to Microbacterium sp. after heart transplantation. J. Med. Microbiol. 55335-339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hirji, Z., R. Saragosa, H. Dedier, M. Crump, N. Franke, L. Burrows, F. Jamieson, S. Brown, and M. A. Gardam. 2003. Contamination of bone marrow products with an actinomycete resembling Microbacterium species and reinfusion into autologous stem cell and bone marrow transplant recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36e115-e121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ko, K. S., W. S. Oh, M. Y. Lee, K. R. Peck, N. Y. Lee, and J. H. Song. 2007. A new Microbacterium species isolated from the blood of a patient with fever: Microbacterium pyrexiae sp. nov. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 57393-397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Laffineur, K., V. Avesani, G. Cornu, J. Charlier, M. Janssens, G. Wauters, and M. Delmée. 2003. Bacteremia due to a novel Microbacterium species in a patient with leukemia and description of Microbacterium paraoxydans sp. nov. J. Clin. Microbiol. 412242-2246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lau, S. K. P., P. C. Y. Woo, G. K. S. Woo, and K.-Y. Yuen. 2002. Catheter-related Microbacterium bacteremia identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 402681-2685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Schippers, A., K. Bosecker, C. Spröer, and P. Schumann. 2005. Microbacterium oleivorans sp. nov. and Microbacterium hydrocarbonoxydans sp. nov., novel crude-oil-degrading gram-positive bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55655-660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Schumann, P., F. A. Rainey, J. Burghart, E. Stackebrandt, and N. Weiss. 1999. Reclassification of Brevibacterium oxydans (Chatelain and Second 1966) as Microbacterium oxydans comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49175-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Stackebrandt, E., and J. Ebers. 2006. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol. Today 33152-155. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Takeuchi, M., and K. Hatano. 1998. Union of the genera Microbacterium Orla-Jensen and Aureobacterium Collins et al. in a redefined genus Microbacterium. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48739-747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Takeuchi, M., and K. Hatano. 1998. Proposal of six new species in the genus Microbacterium and transfer of Flavobacterium marinotypicum ZoBell and Upham to the genus Microbacterium as Microbacterium maritypicum comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 48973-982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yokota, A., M. Takeuchi, T. Sakane, and N. Weiss. 1993. Proposal of six new species in the genus Aureobacterium and transfer of Flavobacterium esteraromaticum Omelianski to the genus Aureobacterium as Aureobacterium esteraromaticum comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 43555-564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES