The presence of antibiotics and other pharmaceuticals in natural waters and overland runoff has selected for highly resistant bacteria in nonclinical settings (13, 19). Of particular interest are methicillin-resistant staphylococci shed by humans and animals, as well as the gene conferring their resistance to ß-lactam antibiotics, mecA. Although mecA is most commonly associated with staphylococci (9), the detection of a mecA homologue in Enterococcus hirae (5) has led to the speculation that mecA also occurs in nonstaphylococcal genera (7). Despite continual increases in the community prevalence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci (16), there is little understanding of the role of the natural environment as a reservoir of staphylococci and other potentially pathogenic bacteria that harbor mecA. Based on these concerns, we investigated the occurrence of methicillin-resistant staphylococci and mecA in surface waters impacted by suburban runoff and fecal pollution.
Water samples (1 liter) were collected from 13 locations in Bay Village, OH, including a recreational beach (5 sites) and a tributary (8 sites) that empties into Lake Erie adjacent to the beach. These waters are known to contain elevated densities of fecal pollution indicator bacteria (Escherichia coli and enterococci) and have been implicated in outbreaks of bacterial disease, including gastroenteritis, dermatitis, and acute respiratory illness (3). One hundred milliliters of each sample was filtered through a nitrocellulose membrane (0.45-μm pore size), following which the membranes were incubated in Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with oxacillin (6 mg liter−1) and polymyxin B (25,000 IU) for 18 h at 35°C. An inoculum (50 μl) from each sample (all 13 samples exhibited growth) was transferred to Baird-Parker agar base supplemented with egg yolk-tellurite emulsion (1, 12) along with cultures of preidentified control bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (SB-01) (20), S. aureus (ATCC 6538), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC 146). The DNA from 65 isolates that exhibited a phenotype consistent with that of Staphylococcus spp. (black, convex, shiny colonies) and the control strains were subjected to multiplex PCR analysis (12) targeting a Staphylococcus species-specific segment of the 16S rRNA gene (17), an S. aureus-specific segment of femB (11), and mecA, which encodes penicillin-binding protein 2a (11). While none of the environmental isolates were identified as staphylococci, mecA was detected in 44 isolates. The putative identities of 25 mecA-containing isolates representing all of the study sites were assessed by sequencing approximately 1,000 bp of the 16S rRNA gene (10), followed by BLAST analysis. Further confirmation of identity was achieved using the API 20E and 20 Strep systems (Biomerieux) in addition to a series of genetic and other biochemical assays (Table 1). The mecA-containing isolates were identified as Proteus vulgaris (n = 18), Morganella morganii (n = 4), and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 3). Although Baird-Parker agar is most commonly used to isolate staphylococci, the growth of these bacteria was not surprising, since each is known to tolerate the supplements used to select against non-lecithinase-producing bacteria (tellurite) (18, 21) and gram-negative species (polymyxin B) (6, 8). The validity of this result was further confirmed when preidentified strains of P. vulgaris (ATCC 6896), M. morganii (NRRL B-1663), and E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) exhibited a phenotype on Baird-Parker agar similar to that of control strains of S. aureus (ATCC 6538) and S. epidermidis (ATCC 146).
TABLE 1.
Identity of mecA-containing isolates (nb) | Test result
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Biochemical test
|
Growth/appearance on diagnostic mediumc
|
Species-specific PCR analysisd
|
|||||
Gram stain | Catalase | Swarming | mEI | Slanetz and Bartley | P. vulgaris | E. faecalis | |
P. vulgaris (18) | − | + | + | − | − | + | − |
M. morganii (4) | − | + | − | − | − | +/−e | − |
E. faecalis (3) | + | − | − | + | + | − | + |
Preidentified strains of Proteus vulgaris (ATCC 6896), Morganella morganii (NRRL B-1663), and Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212) were used as controls in each assay. +, positive result; −, negative result, +/−, intermediate result.
n, no. of isolates.
mEI (BD Diagnostics) and Slanetz and Bartley (Oxoid) media are differential and selective for Enterococcus spp.
Isolates of M. morganella exhibited a weak PCR signal.
It has been suggested that mecA originated in Staphylococcus sciuri or Enterococcus hirae and then became established in species of clinically significant staphylococci, including S. aureus and S. epidermidis (5, 7, 9). To determine the relationship of mecA detected in the current study to previously determined mecA sequences, approximately 250 bp of mecA from a representative isolate of P. vulgaris, M. morganii, and E. faecalis was commercially sequenced (GenBank accession no. EU710763, EU710764, and EU736140). BLAST analysis and sequence alignment (ClustalW) revealed 100% similarity only to sequences of mecA found in S. aureus and other staphylococci that harbored the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). The similarity of the mecA sequences among species of Proteus, Morganella, Enterococcus, and Staphylococcus indicates that mecA is more widely distributed in the environment than previously understood and also hints at the potential for SCCmec transfer among differing bacteria genera. Although the transfer of SCCmec among genera is thought to be relatively rare, segments of penicillin-binding-protein-encoding genes can be acquired by marginally resistant bacteria, including Haemophilus, Neisseria, and Streptococcus (4), effectively increasing their resistance to β-lactam antibiotics.
P. vulgaris, M. morganii, and E. faecalis are causal agents of urinary tract, wound, and respiratory infections and are known to exhibit resistance to multiple antibiotics. Antibiotic sensitivity assays were performed with the mecA-containing isolates according to CLSI guidelines (2), which revealed that all of the isolates were resistant to three β-lactam antibiotics: oxacillin (MIC > 128 mg liter−1), ampicillin (MIC > 128 mg liter−1), and amoxicillin (MIC > 128 mg liter−1). The isolates were also resistant to antibiotics representing other classes, including glycopeptides (vancomycin [MIC > 128 mg liter−1]), macrolides (erythromycin [MIC > 128 mg liter−1]), and tetracyclines (tetracycline [MIC > 32 mg liter−1]). Although tolerance to glycopeptides and macrolides is expected for members of the Enterobacteriaceae, the resistance patterns exhibited by all of the isolates suggest that multiple resistance mechanisms characterize these environmental pathogens. All of the isolates were susceptible to trimethoprim (MIC < 8 mg liter−1) and ciprofloxacin (MIC < 1 mg liter−1). The antibiotic susceptibility of control strains was also assayed to determine if the environmental isolates exhibited unique susceptibility patterns. In all cases, the environmental strains exhibited resistance to a greater number of antibiotics than the control strains. Specifically, P. vulgaris (ATCC 6896) was susceptible to tetracycline, M. morganii (NRRL B-1663) was susceptible to erythromycin and tetracycline, and E. faecalis (ATCC 29212) was susceptible (or displayed intermediate resistance) to all of the antibiotics tested. These results are of particular interest, since they not only illustrate a difference in resistance between control and environmental strains of the same bacteria species but also show that mecA can be maintained in natural reservoirs.
Although methicillin-resistant staphylococci were not detected in natural surface waters associated with a recreational beach, other resistant pathogens were isolated, including mecA-containing enterococci and members of the Enterobacteriaceae. Our results underscore the role of the natural environment as a reservoir of clinically significant pathogens that harbor mecA. Combined with the historic implication of these waters in disease outbreaks, these results further emphasize the need for environmental pathogen surveillance to support ongoing epidemiology programs.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
16S rRNA gene sequences determined in this work have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers EU710760 to EU710762 and EU736118 to EU736139.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by grants from the United States Department of Agriculture (CSREES grant number 2007-31100-06039), the Cuyahoga County Board of Health, and the Sigma Xi Grants-in-Aid of Research program.
Footnotes
Published ahead of print on 24 September 2008.
REFERENCES
- 1.Baird, R. M., and W. H. Lee. 1995. Media used in detection and enumeration of Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2615-24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2006. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, approved standard, 9th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards document M2-A9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
- 3.Dorfman, M., and N. Stoner. 2007. Testing the waters: a guide to water quality at vacation beaches, 17th ed. National Resources Defense Council, New York, NY. http://www.nrdc.org/water/oceans/ttw/titinx.asp.
- 4.Dowson, G., T. J. Coffey, and B. G. Spratt. 1994. Origin and molecular epidemiology of penicillin-binding-protein-mediated resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. Trends Microbiol. 2361-365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.el Kharroubi, A., P. Jacques, G. Piras, J. Van Beeumen, J. Coyette, and J. M. Ghuysen. 1991. The Enterococcus hirae R40 penicillin-binding protein 5 and the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus penicillin binding protein 2′ are similar. Biochem. J. 280463-469. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fabretti, F., C. Theilacker, L. Baldassarri, Z. Kaczynski, A. Kropec, O. Holst, and J. Huebner. 2006. Alanine esters of enterococcal lipoteichoic acid play a role in biofilm formation and resistance to antimicrobial peptides. Infect. Immun. 744164-4171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fitzgerald, J. R., and J. M. Musser. 2003. The molecular evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, p. 137-158. In A. C. Fluit and F. J. Schmitz (ed.), MRSA: current perspectives. Caister Academic Press, Wymondham, Norfolk, England.
- 8.Gales, A. C., R. N. Jones, and H. S. Sader. 2006. Global assessment of the antimicrobial activity of polymyxin B against 54,731 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli: report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance programme (2001-2004). Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 12315-321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hanssen, A. M., G. G. Kjeldsen, and J. U. Sollid. 2004. Local variants of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec in sporadic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci: evidence of horizontal gene transfer? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48285-296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hugenholtz, P., C. Pitulle, K. L. Hershberger, and N. R. Pace. 1998. Novel division-level bacterial diversity in a Yellowstone hot spring. J. Bacteriol. 180366-376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jonas, D., M. Speck, F. D. Daschner, and H. Grundmann. 2002. Rapid PCR-based identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from screening swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 401821-1823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kassem, I. I., V. Sigler, and M. A. Esseili. 2007. Public computer surfaces are reservoirs for methicillin-resistant staphylococci. ISME J. 1265-268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kruse, H., and H. Sorum. 1994. Transfer of multiple drug resistance plasmids between bacteria of diverse origins in natural microenvironments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 604015-4021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kupfer, D. M., A. K. Chaturvedi, D. V. Canfield, and B. A. Roe. 1999. PCR-based identification of postmortem microbial contaminants: a preliminary study. J. Forensic Sci. 44592-596. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Macovei, L., and L. Zurek. 2006. Ecology of antibiotic resistance genes: characterization of enterococci from houseflies collected in food settings. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 724028-4035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martins, A., and L. Cunha Mde. 2007. Methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci: epidemiological and molecular aspects. Microbiol. Immunol. 51787-795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mason, W. J., J. S. Blevins, K. Beenken, N. Wibowo, N. Ojha, and M. S. Smeltzer. 2001. Multiplex PCR protocol for the diagnosis of staphylococcal infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 393332-3338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ruoff, K. L., L. De La Maza, M. J. Murtagh, J. D. Spargo, and M. J. Ferraro. 1990. Species identities of enterococci isolated from clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28435-437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Spongberg, A. L., and J. D. Witter. 2008. Pharmaceutical compounds in the wastewater process stream in Northwest Ohio. Sci. Total Environ. 397148-157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tenover, F. C., R. Arbeit, G. Archer, J. Biddle, S. Byrne, R. Goering, G. Hancock, G. A. Hébert, B. Hill, R. Hollis, et al. 1994. Comparison of traditional and molecular methods of typing isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 32407-415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Toptchieva, A., G. Sisson, L. J. Bryden, D. E. Taylor, and P. S. Hoffman. 2003. An inducible tellurite-resistance operon in Proteus mirabilis. Microbiology 1491285-1295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]