Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1991 Apr;59(4):1476–1488. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.4.1476-1488.1991

Binding interactions of murine natural killer cells with the fungal target Cryptococcus neoformans.

J W Murphy 1, M R Hidore 1, N Nabavi 1
PMCID: PMC257866  PMID: 2004826

Abstract

Murine natural killer (NK) cells have been shown to inhibit the growth of the yeastlike organism Cryptococcus neoformans both in vivo and in vitro. An essential first step in NK cell-mediated damage of cryptococcal cells is the binding of the NK cell to the cryptococcal cell. The studies presented here focused on the binding event. Electron photomicrographs and three-dimensional reconstructions of NK cell-C. neoformans conjugates show that NK cells bind to cryptococci through many microvilli. This is in contrast to the broad membrane-membrane interactions which form the binding site of NK cell-YAC-1 tumor cell conjugates. NK cell binding to cryptococci is much slower than NK cell binding to YAC-1 targets. Maximal conjugate formation with cryptococcal targets is reached after 2 h, whereas maximal conjugate formation with YAC-1 targets is obtained after 20 min. Once maximum NK cell-C, neoformans conjugate formation is obtained, another 4 h is required before damage to the cryptococcal cells can be detected with the CFU assay. These data indicate that the binding and action of NK cells on C. neoformans cells requires considerably more time than is necessary for similar events to occur in the NK cell-tumor cell model. NK cell membrane integrity is necessary for NK cells to bind to tumor targets, since some disruption of membrane integrity with 0.1 M dimethyl sulfoxide reduces conjugate formation and tumor cell lysis. In contrast, 0.1 M dimethyl sulfoxide did not diminish NK cell binding to cryptococcal targets; however, it significantly reduced cryptococcal growth inhibition. Although we have observed several differences in NK cell binding to the cryptococcal target compared with NK cell binding to tumor cell targets, there are some similarities in binding interactions of NK cells with the two different targets. Disulfide bonding appears to play a role in the binding of NK cells to both targets, since 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, a reagent that reduces disulfide bonds, prevented NK cells from binding to the tumor targets as well as the cryptococcal targets. Actin filaments, components of the cytoskeletal network, must be intact for NK cells to bind to YAC-1 cells or cryptococci. Taken together, our data confirm that binding of NK cells to the cryptococcal target is prerequisite to the stages that result in damage to the cryptococcal cell and that there are similarities and differences in NK cell-binding interactions with structurally different target cells.

Full text

PDF
1476

Images in this article

1479Image
on p.1479
1480Image
on p.1480
1481Image
on p.1481
1482Image
on p.1482

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Carpen O., Virtanen I., Saksela E. Ultrastructure of human natural killer cells: nature of the cytolytic contacts in relation to cellular secretion. J Immunol. 1982 Jun;128(6):2691–2697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carpén O., Virtanen I., Lehto V. P., Saksela E. Polarization of NK cell cytoskeleton upon conjugation with sensitive target cells. J Immunol. 1983 Dec;131(6):2695–2698. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carpén O., Virtanen I., Saksela E. The cytotoxic activity of human natural killer cells requires an intact secretory apparatus. Cell Immunol. 1981 Feb;58(1):97–106. doi: 10.1016/0008-8749(81)90152-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Deem R. L., Targan S. R. Analysis of sequential substages of the natural killer cell lethal hit. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1985;184:239–256. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-8326-0_16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dennert G., Kupfer A., Anderson C. G., Singer S. J. Reorientation of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule organizing center: is it a means to polarize cell-mediated cytotoxicity? Adv Exp Med Biol. 1985;184:83–97. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4684-8326-0_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flanagan M. D., Lin S. Cytochalasins block actin filament elongation by binding to high affinity sites associated with F-actin. J Biol Chem. 1980 Feb 10;255(3):835–838. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Galey F. R., Nilsson S. E. A new method for transferring sections from the liquid surface of the trough through staining solutions to the supporting film of a grid. J Ultrastruct Res. 1966 Feb;14(3):405–410. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(66)80057-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goddette D. W., Frieden C. Actin polymerization. The mechanism of action of cytochalasin D. J Biol Chem. 1986 Dec 5;261(34):15974–15980. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hidore M. R., Mislan T. W., Murphy J. W. Responses of murine natural killer cells to binding of the fungal target Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun. 1991 Apr;59(4):1489–1499. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.4.1489-1499.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hidore M. R., Murphy J. W. Correlation of natural killer cell activity and clearance of Cryptococcus neoformans from mice after adoptive transfer of splenic nylon wool-nonadherent cells. Infect Immun. 1986 Feb;51(2):547–555. doi: 10.1128/iai.51.2.547-555.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hidore M. R., Murphy J. W. Murine natural killer cell interactions with a fungal target, Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun. 1989 Jul;57(7):1990–1997. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.7.1990-1997.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hidore M. R., Murphy J. W. Natural cellular resistance of beige mice against Cryptococcus neoformans. J Immunol. 1986 Dec 1;137(11):3624–3631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hidore M. R., Nabavi N., Reynolds C. W., Henkart P. A., Murphy J. W. Cytoplasmic components of natural killer cells limit the growth of Cryptococcus neoformans. J Leukoc Biol. 1990 Jul;48(1):15–26. doi: 10.1002/jlb.48.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hiserodt J. C., Britvan L. J., Targan S. R. Characterization of the cytolytic reaction mechanism of the human natural killer (NK) lymphocyte: resolution into binding, programming, and killer cell-independent steps. J Immunol. 1982 Oct;129(4):1782–1787. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hiserodt J. C., Britvan L. J., Targan S. R. Differential effects of various pharmacological agents on the cytolytic reaction mechanism of the human natural killer lymphocyte: further resolution of programming for lysis and KCIL into discrete stages. J Immunol. 1982 Nov;129(5):2266–2270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Julius M. H., Simpson E., Herzenberg L. A. A rapid method for the isolation of functional thymus-derived murine lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol. 1973 Oct;3(10):645–649. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830031011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kalina M., Hollander N. The effect of cytochalasin B on effector--target cell interaction. Quantitative and ultrastructural study. Immunology. 1975 Oct;29(4):709–717. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Katz P., Zaytoun A. M., Lee J. H., Jr Mechanisms of human cell-mediated cytotoxicity. III. Dependence of natural killing on microtubule and microfilament integrity. J Immunol. 1982 Dec;129(6):2816–2825. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kiessling R., Klein E., Wigzell H. "Natural" killer cells in the mouse. I. Cytotoxic cells with specificity for mouse Moloney leukemia cells. Specificity and distribution according to genotype. Eur J Immunol. 1975 Feb;5(2):112–117. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830050208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kupfer A., Dennert G., Singer S. J. Polarization of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center within cloned natural killer cells bound to their targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983 Dec;80(23):7224–7228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.23.7224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Luini W., Boraschi D., Alberti S., Aleotti A., Tagliabue A. Morphological characterization of a cell population responsible for natural killer activity. Immunology. 1981 Aug;43(4):663–668. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. MacLean-Fletcher S., Pollard T. D. Mechanism of action of cytochalasin B on actin. Cell. 1980 Jun;20(2):329–341. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90619-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Murphy J. W., Cozad G. C. Immunological unresponsiveness induced by cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide assayed by the hemolytic plaque technique. Infect Immun. 1972 Jun;5(6):896–901. doi: 10.1128/iai.5.6.896-901.1972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Murphy J. W., McDaniel D. O. In vitro reactivity of natural killer (NK) cells against Cryptococcus neoformans. J Immunol. 1982 Apr;128(4):1577–1583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nabavi N., Murphy J. W. In vitro binding of natural killer cells to Cryptococcus neoformans targets. Infect Immun. 1985 Oct;50(1):50–57. doi: 10.1128/iai.50.1.50-57.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ortaldo J. R., Reynolds C. W. Natural killer activity: definition of a function rather than a cell type. J Immunol. 1987 Jun 15;138(12):4545–4546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Quan P. C., Ishizaka T., Bloom B. R. Studies on the mechanism of NK cell lysis. J Immunol. 1982 Apr;128(4):1786–1791. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. REYNOLDS E. S. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963 Apr;17:208–212. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.1.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Roder J. C., Argov S., Klein M., Petersson C., Kiessling R., Andersson K., Hansson M. Target-effector cell interaction in the natural killer cell system. V. Energy requirements, membrane integrity, and the possible involvement of lysosomal enzymes. Immunology. 1980 May;40(1):107–116. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Roder J. C., Kiessling R., Biberfeld P., Andersson B. Target-effector interaction in the natural killer (NK) cell system. II. The isolation of NK cells and studies on the mechanism of killing. J Immunol. 1978 Dec;121(6):2509–2517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Spurr A. R. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res. 1969 Jan;26(1):31–43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(69)90033-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Timonen T., Ortaldo J. R., Herberman R. B. Analysis by a single cell cytotoxicity assay of natural killer (NK) cells frequencies among human large granular lymphocytes and of the effects of interferon on their activity. J Immunol. 1982 Jun;128(6):2514–2521. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Trinchieri G. Biology of natural killer cells. Adv Immunol. 1989;47:187–376. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2776(08)60664-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ullberg M., Jondal M. Recycling and target binding capacity of human natural killer cells. J Exp Med. 1981 Mar 1;153(3):615–628. doi: 10.1084/jem.153.3.615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES