Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care logoLink to Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care
. 1995:164–168.

Nurses, pagers, and patient-specific criteria: three keys to improved critical value reporting.

K E Tate 1, R M Gardner 1, K Scherting 1
PMCID: PMC2579076  PMID: 8563258

Abstract

At LDS Hospital, we have developed and evaluated a computerized critical value reporting system based on digital pagers. Criteria used to identify critical values are patient-specific. An evaluation of the system was conducted from October 23, 1993 to January 21, 1994. Results showed that 100% of all critical values (497 values in the form of 335 alerts) were reported to clinicians within an average of 38.6 minutes, and that 51% of all alerts were received within 12 minutes. Data also showed that 92% of the alerts were considered valid, that 76% were communicated directly to the primary care nurse, and that 67% of the time nurses were previously unaware of the critical value(s).

Full text

PDF
164

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradshaw K. E., Gardner R. M., Pryor T. A. Development of a computerized laboratory alerting system. Comput Biomed Res. 1989 Dec;22(6):575–587. doi: 10.1016/0010-4809(89)90077-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Rind D. M., Davis R., Safran C. Designing studies of computer-based alerts and reminders. MD Comput. 1995 Mar-Apr;12(2):122–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Tate K. E., Gardner R. M., Weaver L. K. A computerized laboratory alerting system. MD Comput. 1990 Sep-Oct;7(5):296–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES