Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care logoLink to Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care
. 1995:581–585.

A model for adapting clinical guidelines for electronic implementation in primary care.

D F Lobach 1
PMCID: PMC2579160  PMID: 8563352

Abstract

Medical informaticians who seek to implement clinical guidelines by computer must be aware of a significant gap that exists between guideline development and utilization. In order to be effective, guideline recommendations must be followed by clinicians; in order for clinicians to follow willingly, they must agree with the guidelines. This paper presents a model process for building consensus among clinicians that can be used to obtain support for guideline recommendations prior to their electronic implementation. This approach involves initial presentation of the guidelines by a specialist, iterative cycles of surveying clinicians' opinions about the guidelines and revising the guidelines, supervision of the process by a practice opinion leader, and final group discussion of the revised guidelines to reach consensus. This model was successfully used to adapt guidelines for the continuing care of patients with diabetes mellitus that were subsequently implemented electronically with broad support of the primary care clinicians using them. The model minimized the need for lengthy group discussion by surveying individuals' attitudes and working through a practice opinion leader to gain consensus support for the guidelines. An efficient approach for developing support for guidelines among practitioners will facilitate the electronic implementation of guidelines and lead to enhanced compliance with guidelines after implementation.

Full text

PDF
581

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Audet A. M., Greenfield S., Field M. Medical practice guidelines: current activities and future directions. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Nov 1;113(9):709–714. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-9-709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ellrodt A. G., Conner L., Riedinger M., Weingarten S. Measuring and improving physician compliance with clinical practice guidelines. A controlled interventional trial. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Feb 15;122(4):277–282. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-4-199502150-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Evans R. S., Larsen R. A., Burke J. P., Gardner R. M., Meier F. A., Jacobson J. A., Conti M. T., Jacobson J. T., Hulse R. K. Computer surveillance of hospital-acquired infections and antibiotic use. JAMA. 1986 Aug 22;256(8):1007–1011. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gorton T. A., Cranford C. O., Golden W. E., Walls R. C., Pawelak J. E. Primary care physicians' response to dissemination of practice guidelines. Arch Fam Med. 1995 Feb;4(2):135–142. doi: 10.1001/archfami.4.2.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Grimshaw J. M., Russell I. T. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet. 1993 Nov 27;342(8883):1317–1322. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92244-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grol R. National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards. Br J Gen Pract. 1990 Sep;40(338):361–364. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haynes R. B., Walker C. J. Computer-aided quality assurance. A critical appraisal. Arch Intern Med. 1987 Jul;147(7):1297–1301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Headrick L. A., Speroff T., Pelecanos H. I., Cebul R. D. Efforts to improve compliance with the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 1992 Dec;152(12):2490–2496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnston M. E., Langton K. B., Haynes R. B., Mathieu A. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcome. A critical appraisal of research. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jan 15;120(2):135–142. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-2-199401150-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelly J. T., Swartwout J. E. Development of practice parameters by physician organizations. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1990 Feb;16(2):54–57. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30337-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kosecoff J., Kanouse D. E., Rogers W. H., McCloskey L., Winslow C. M., Brook R. H. Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice. JAMA. 1987 Nov 20;258(19):2708–2713. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leape L. L. Practice guidelines and standards: an overview. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1990 Feb;16(2):42–49. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30335-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lobach D. F., Hammond W. E. Development and evaluation of a Computer-Assisted Management Protocol (CAMP): improved compliance with care guidelines for diabetes mellitus. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:787–791. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lomas J., Anderson G. M., Domnick-Pierre K., Vayda E., Enkin M. W., Hannah W. J. Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med. 1989 Nov 9;321(19):1306–1311. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198911093211906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lomas J., Enkin M., Anderson G. M., Hannah W. J., Vayda E., Singer J. Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines. Delivery after previous cesarean section. JAMA. 1991 May 1;265(17):2202–2207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lomas J., Haynes R. B. A taxonomy and critical review of tested strategies for the application of clinical practice recommendations: from "official" to "individual" clinical policy. Am J Prev Med. 1988;4(4 Suppl):77–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McDonald C. J., Hui S. L., Smith D. M., Tierney W. M., Cohen S. J., Weinberger M., McCabe G. P. Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer medical record. A two-year randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Jan;100(1):130–138. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-100-1-130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. McDonald C. J. Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectability of man. N Engl J Med. 1976 Dec 9;295(24):1351–1355. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197612092952405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. McDonald C. J., Wilson G. A., McCabe G. P., Jr Physician response to computer reminders. JAMA. 1980 Oct 3;244(14):1579–1581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tunis S. R., Hayward R. S., Wilson M. C., Rubin H. R., Bass E. B., Johnston M., Steinberg E. P. Internists' attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jun 1;120(11):956–963. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-11-199406010-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vermeulen L. C., Jr, Ratko T. A., Erstad B. L., Brecher M. E., Matuszewski K. A. A paradigm for consensus. The University Hospital Consortium guidelines for the use of albumin, nonprotein colloid, and crystalloid solutions. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Feb 27;155(4):373–379. doi: 10.1001/archinte.155.4.373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Woolf S. H. Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. I. Recent developments. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Sep;150(9):1811–1818. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zyzanski S. J., Stange K. C., Kelly R., Flocke S., Shank J. C., Chao J., Jaén C. R., Smith C. K. Family physicians' disagreements with the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. J Fam Pract. 1994 Aug;39(2):140–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care are provided here courtesy of American Medical Informatics Association

RESOURCES