Abstract
It has been established that subject searches of medical full-text databases obtain higher recall than subject searches in a bibliographic database. In this study we attempted to determine if the same rule might apply when searching for a non-subject parameter such as study design. A simultaneous search of bibliographic and full-text records from the New England Journal of Medicine provided data on the number of items retrieved by each kind of search. Filtering strategies were created for 5 different study types: randomized controlled trials, other clinical trials and prospective studies, cohort studies, longitudinal and follow-up studies, and multicenter studies. The point of the study was to compare the numbers of items retrieved from the bibliographic database, MEDLINE, and those retrieved from the full-text version of NEJM, and to examine the unique access points available in each file. For all the study types the full-text file retrieved a larger number of records than MEDLINE, most of which were retrieved because of methodology terms found in the text but not in the title or abstract. In MEDLINE, descriptors and publication types, two value-added fields supplied by indexers, retrieved 11-89% more than title and abstract alone.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Herxheimer A. Randomised controlled trials: the Cochrane collaboration. J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1993 Apr;27(2):180–180. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hewitt P., Dickersin K., Chalmers T. C. More on MEDLINE searches. Control Clin Trials. 1988 Mar;9(1):85–90. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(88)90012-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirpalani H., Schmidt B., McKibbon K. A., Haynes R. B., Sinclair J. C. Searching MEDLINE for randomized clinical trials involving care of the newborn. Pediatrics. 1989 Apr;83(4):543–546. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKinin E. J., Sievert M., Johnson E. D., Mitchell J. A. The Medline/full-text research project. J Am Soc Inf Sci. 1991 May;42(4):297–307. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199105)42:4<297::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-M. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]