Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes selective hippocampal cell death which is believed to be associated with the cognitive impairment observed in both clinical and experimental settings. The endogenous neurotrophin NT-4/5, a TrkB ligand, has been shown to be neuroprotective for vulnerable CA3 pyramidal neurons after experimental brain injury. In this study, infusion of recombinant NT-4/5 increased survival of CA2/3 pyramidal neurons to 71% after lateral fluid percussion injury in rats, compared to 55% in vehicle-treated controls. The functional outcome of this NT-4/5-mediated neuroprotection was examined using three hippocampal-dependent behavioral tests. Injury-induced impairment was evident in all three tests, but interestingly, there was no treatment-related improvement in any of these measures. Similarly, injury-induced decreased excitability in the Schaffer collaterals was not affected by NT-4/5 treatment. We propose that a deeper understanding of the factors that link neuronal survival to recovery of function will be important for future studies of potentially therapeutic agents.
Keywords: Neurotrophins, Rats, Hippocampal neurons, Neuroprotection, Neuropharmacology, NT-4/5, behavior, cognition, brain injury, Neurotrophin
INTRODUCTION
Chronic cognitive impairments such as deficits in attention, leaning and memory, or slow processing speed are frequently reported as a consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in humans (Salmond and Sahakian, 2005). These long-lasting cognitive impairments are among the most debilitating outcomes in patients, yet, to date, no treatment can prevent or counteract these effects in TBI patients (Maas, 2001, Narayan et al., 2002, Tolias and Bullock, 2004).
Hippocampal pyramidal neurons are particularly vulnerable to brain injury in humans (Tate and Bigler, 2000, Maxwell et al., 2003). Bilateral loss of hippocampal neurons has been observed in 85% of fatal human head injury cases (Kotapka et al., 1992). Cell death in hippocampal area CA3 observed in TBI patients has been replicated by experimental TBI in nonhuman primates (Kotapka et al., 1991), rodents (Cortez et al., 1989, Lowenstein et al., 1992, Hicks et al., 1993, Hicks et al., 1994, Hicks et al., 1995, Colicos and Dash, 1996, Colicos et al., 1996, Hicks et al., 1996, Baldwin et al., 1997, Pierce et al., 1998, Carbonell and Grady, 1999, Golarai et al., 2001, Sato et al., 2001, Grady et al., 2003) and pigs (Smith et al., 1997b). In the lateral fluid percussion (LFP) model of TBI in the rat, significant neuronal cell death occurs in hippocampal area CA2/3 and the hilus of the dentate gyrus, and cognitive deficits have been documented in tests such as the Morris water maze (MWM; for a review see (Fujimoto et al., 2004)). Interestingly, spatial navigation deficits have also been documented in TBI survivors using a computer simulation of the MWM task (Skelton et al., 2006).
We recently demonstrated that the neurotrophin NT-4/5, a TrkB ligand, is highly neuroprotective for hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons after experimental TBI (Royo et al., 2006). Administration of recombinant NT-4/5 following LFP TBI in rats increased survival of pyramidal neurons in area CA2/3. In addition, we showed that endogenous levels of NT-4/5 protein are transiently elevated after injury and that genetic deletion of NT-4/5 increases hippocampal vulnerability to TBI in knockout mice (Royo et al., 2006). These results demonstrate that both endogenous and exogenous NT-4/5 are protective. Here, we tested the hypothesis that NT-4/5-mediated sparing of hippocampal neurons would improve hippocampal function after experimental TBI. This study was designed to test whether NT-4/5-induced neuroprotection would improve injury-induced cognitive impairment and altered hippocampal excitability.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
All procedures involving animals were approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and conform to federal guidelines (National Research Council, 1996).
Lateral fluid percussion (LFP) traumatic brain injury in rats
Young adult male Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 350-400g (Harlan) were housed at 24°C in a 12 hour light/dark cycle, with access to food and water ad libitum. Rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (60 mg/kg, i.p.) and placed in a stereotaxic frame, on a 37°C heating pad. Following the reported protocol for LFP TBI in rats (McIntosh et al., 1989), a midline scalp incision was made and a 5 mm diameter craniotomy was created over the left cortex midway between lambda and bregma and midway between the sagittal suture and the temporal ridge. The dura mater was left intact and a plastic female Luer-Lok connector (3 mm inner diameter) was secured in the craniectomy with cyanoacrylate adhesive and dental cement. Ninety minutes after receiving anesthesia, the animals to be injured (TBI; n=30) were attached to the fluid-percussion device and injured at a moderate level (∼2.9 atm) by percussion of a fluid (saline) pulse applied to the dural surface for 20 ms, causing mechanical deformation of the brain. Animals were removed from the device, the dental cement and Luer-Lok connector were removed, and the scalp sutured. Sham-injured animals (SHAM; n=18) were used as controls and underwent all anesthetic and surgical procedures but did not receive LFP brain injury.
Brain cannulation for NT-4/5 administration
One day before surgery, osmotic mini-pumps (1007D, Alzet, CA) were filled with vehicle (100mM PBS 0.1% BSA, pH 7.4) or recombinant human NT-4/5 (166.7μg/ml in vehicle; R&D Systems), connected to a 28 gauge brain infusion cannula via a 3.5 cm catheter (Alzet brain infusion kit II) under sterile conditions and primed for 18h at 37°C. The recombinant NT-4/5 used in this study was generated by expressing human preproNT4 in Sf21 insect cells. The product consisted of mature 14kDa NT-4/5 as determined by SDS-PAGE reducing gel (R&D Systems, personal communication). Fifteen minutes following surgery/injury, the pump was inserted subcutaneously in the back of the animal and the connected infusion cannula was inserted stereotaxically in the injured primary somatosensory cortex at 3mm posterior to bregma, 3mm lateral and the tip was positioned −3mm from skull surface. The site of cannula implantation is immediately anterior to the site of maximal cortical injury as previously described (Sinson et al., 1995, Sinson et al., 1997, Royo et al., 2006). Animals were randomly assigned to the following groups: sham-injured and vehicle-infused (SHAM/VEH, n=15); LFP-injured and vehicle-infused (TBI/VEH, n=14); or LFP-injured and NT-4/5-infused (TBI/NT4, n=16). The implantation of the osmotic pump and the cannula took an average of 15min. Animals were sutured and allowed to recover from surgery on a 37°C heating pad. The nominal pumping rate was 0.5μl/h for 7 days delivering a dose of 2 μg/day (approximately 5μg/kg/day). At 1 mg/ml NT-4/5 retains more than 70% of its activity after 14 days at 37°C in mini-osmotic pumps (Altar et al., 1994). Pumps were checked after removal for any remaining volume. All animals were subjected to behavioral testing; subsets of animals from each experimental group were used for histological analysis and electrophysiology as indicated below.
Neurological motor function
The composite neuroscore test was previously shown to be sensitive for evaluation of the motor component of LFP injury severity and recovery (McIntosh et al., 1989, Pierce et al., 1998). Composite neuroscore was assessed at 48h, 1 and 2 weeks post-injury using seven 4-point tests (maximal composite neuroscore = 28). Animals were scored on a 4 (normal) to 0 (severely impaired) integral scale for left and right forelimb flexion, left and right lateral pulsion, left and right hindlimb flexion and the ability to stand on an inclined angle board in the vertical and horizontal positions. Animals were scored on the angle board with respect to their change in angle from pre-injury testing, where 0 degrees change = 4; 2.5 degrees = 3; 5 degrees = 2, 7.5 degrees = 1; 10+ degrees = 0, based on the average score for all positions. These are ordinal data and not normally distributed. Data were analyzed with the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test (Pierce et al., 1998).
Morris water maze (MWM) test for visuo-spatial learning
Behavioral tests were conducted over several days to minimize stress on the animals, with the most aversive tests (MWM and CFC) separated by five days. The MWM was used to evaluate learning and anterograde memory for 8 trials/day over 3 days beginning at 1 week after the injury. The maze is a black circular pool (1.80 m diameter, 0.6 m depth) filled with water (22–24°C). A 10-cm diameter, clear Plexiglas escape platform was placed 1 cm below the surface of the water in the learning phases. The task requires that the animals learn to locate the submerged platform using external visual cues after being placed at 1 of 4 sites in the pool. Latencies to find the platform were recorded for each trial, with a maximal allowed time of 60 seconds, and averaged for each group of 4 trials. The investigator was blinded to the injury/treatment status of the animals. Twenty-four hours following the last learning trial, animals were placed back in the maze for two probe trials (60s each) without the platform. The time spent in each zone was recorded using video monitoring and tracking software (Accutrak, CA) and the zones were mathematically weighted based on the proximity to the platform (see inset in Figure 4B). The score for the probe trials were determined by summing the weighted time spent in each zone: (0 × time in zone 1) + (1 × time in zone 2) + (5 × time in zone 3) + (10 × time in zone 4) and using the better of the two scores for each animal (see Thompson et al., 2006). Data were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA followed by the Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test.
Contextual Fear Conditioning (CFC) test for associative learning
Retrograde amnesia was tested by conditioning the animals one day before the injury and testing on day 14 post-injury. For the CFC test, animals are exposed to an aversive stimulus (foot shock) in a particular context (a cage). The association of these two events is indicated by freezing behavior (becoming immobile) when rats are placed back in the same context without receiving the shocks. Naïve rats were placed in a cage with an electrified grid floor and received foot shocks (5 × 1.5 mA, 2s duration), one minute apart, delivered by a computer-controlled system (Colbourn Instruments, PA) and then randomly assigned to experimental groups for surgery/injury and infusion on the following day. At 2 weeks post-injury, animals were individually placed in the electrified cage without foot shocks for 5 min. Freezing behavior was measured using a infrared motion sensor detecting the onset and offset of any movements. Freezing behavior was defined as any period of inactivity greater than 10 seconds during the 5 min testing period and the total amount of freezing time was expressed as a percentage. In pilot experiments, a cutoff time of 10 sec was sufficient to distinguish freezing from pauses in movement (data not shown). Contextual fear was distinguished from general fear by placing each animal in a novel context and measuring freezing behavior for 5 min. Data were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA followed by the Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test.
Open Field test for exploratory behavior
A modified version of the open field test was conducted in a brightly lit circular field (2 meter diameter) on day 13 post-injury. Three virtual concentric circular zones (zone 1:radius=1; zone 2:radius=2/3 and zone 3:radius=1/3, see inset on figure 4F) were defined using video monitoring coupled to tracking software (Accutrak). An exploratory score was calculated as the sum of all entries into any zone over a 5 minute observation period, similar to the standard protocol which sums entries into square zones (see O'Connor et al., 2003). Data were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA followed by the Newman-Keuls multiple comparison test.
Stereological estimation of neuronal cell loss in the hippocampus following TBI
At 15 days post-injury a randomly selected subset of animals (6 per group) were over-anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (200 mg/kg, ip), transcardially perfused with heparinized saline (1 unit/ml) for 1 min followed by 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 100 mM, pH 7.4) for 5 min. Brains were removed, post-fixed for 4h at 4°C, infiltrated with 30% sucrose for 72 hours and snap frozen in isopentane at −40°C. Frozen sections of 50 μm thickness were cut using a sliding microtome (Microm, Germany) and stained with cresyl violet.
Estimation of pyramidal neuron number in the hippocampal subfields was based on the optical fractionator sampling scheme as described by West and colleagues (West et al., 1991) and was carried out exactly as previously described (Royo et al., 2006). The optical microscope used for this study (Nikon Microphot, NY) was equipped with a 3D motorized stage (Prior Scientific), a depth gauge (Heidenhain, Germany), and a digital camera (Toshiba, Japan). Stereological quantification was performed using the computer assisted stereological toolbox (CAST-Grid Olympus, Denmark). Following a systematic random sampling pattern, every 6th section (section sampling fraction: ssf=1/6) was selected between −2.5 mm and −5.5mm relative to bregma. The region of interest was defined and delineated under a 2X objective on each section as the pyramidal neurons in subfield CA2 and subfield CA3a/b, excluding subfield CA3c. Pyramidal cell counting was conducted using an oil immersion 63X objective lens with a 1.4 numerical aperture. The thickness (t) of each section was defined as the average of 3 measurements randomly selected within the sampling area using the depth gauge (microcator). Estimation of neuronal cell number N was then calculated as N= ΣQ− . t/h . 1/asf . 1/ssf with Q− being the number of cells counted per area, h, the disector height and asf, the area sampling fraction. A 5% area sampling fraction and a 12 μm disector height (h) were computer-guided for randomization. The coefficient of error (CE) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated as described (Royo et al., 2006). The mean CE in this study was 0.066. The CV was 0.13 for the SHAM/VEH group, 0.11 for the TBI/VEH group and 0.23 for the TBI/NT4 group. Estimation of cell death in the hilus was performed in a similar fashion except the area sampling fraction was 10%.
Fluorojade staining for neuronal cell death
Alternate 50 μm sections from the same brains (TBI/VEH and TBI/NT4 groups, n=6 per group) were used to estimate the amount of Fluorojade staining in the hippocampus CA1, CA2/3, dentate gyrus and hilus subfields. For each animal, 5 sections selected between −2.30 and −3.80 mm relative to bregma were mounted onto slides and dried overnight. Sections were gradually dehydrated in ethanol, rehydrated and placed in 0.06% potassium permanganate for 20 min, then rinsed with distilled water and immersed in a staining solution of 0.001% Fluoro-Jade-B (Chemicon International, CA) in 0.1% acetic acid for 30 min. After rinsing in distilled water, the slides were dried at 40°C, dehydrated in xylene, and coverslipped in mounting media. Cellular staining was semi-quantified by an observer blinded to injury/treatment status using an ordinal scale: 0: no cells; 1: 1-5 cells; 2: 6-20 cells; 3: >20 cells.
Immunostaining for NT-4/5 diffusion
To evaluate drug diffusion into the brain parenchyma following NT-4/5 infusion, brain sections were prepared as described above, from a group of animals (n=3) at 30 hours post-TBI. Sections were washed in 0.1 M TBS; pH 7.4 and blocked in 0.1% Triton-X; 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA); 2% normal horse serum for 1 h at room temperature. Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with the primary antibody (NT-4/5 rabbit polyclonal IgG diluted 1:100, Chemicon, CA). Control sections were processed in parallel by omitting the primary antibody. Following washing, sections were incubated with a biotinylated conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG; Jackson Immunoresearch, PA). Following avidin-biotin amplification (Vector ABC Elite kit, Vector Laboratories, CA), sections were developed with 3,3,-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride.
Field potential recording in acutely isolated hippocampal slices
Extracellular recordings for CA3 output were conducted on transverse hippocampal slices at 14 days post-injury in a subset of animals randomly selected from the experimental groups: SHAM/VEH (n=4); TBI/VEH (n=5); TBI/NT4 (n=4). Animals were anesthetized with halothane, decapitated and the brains quickly removed and chilled for 2 min in a modified sucrose-based artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) solution (201mM sucrose; 3.2 mM KCl; 1.25mM NaHPO4; 2mM MgCl2; 2mM CaCl2; 26mM NaHCO3; 10mM glucose, equilibrated with 95% O2/5% CO2 at 4°C.) The hippocampus from the injured hemisphere was dissected en bloc, placed back in the bubbling aCSF at 4°C for 2 min and subsequently, 400 μm slices from the dorsal hippocampus (first 12 sections) were cut perpendicular to the long axis using a mechanical tissue chopper (Brinkman Instruments). Slices were quickly transferred to a holding chamber at room temperature and equilibrated for at least 1 hr before being placed in the recording chamber. A stimulating bipolar tungsten electrode was placed in the Schaffer collaterals and a monopolar recording electrode in stratum radiatum of CA1 (Figure 4-G). Stimulation intensities ranging from 50-500 μA (200 μs duration) were applied to the slices and the slopes of the recorded field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) were used to construct input/output curves. Four to six slices per animal were evaluated (23-28 slices per experimental group).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 3.02 (GraphPad Software Inc., CA). The Pearson product-moment correlations and their significance levels were calculated using STATA. The specific statistical tests that were used are listed with the methods for each behavioral or histological test above. The data are presented as mean +/− standard deviation (SD) or mean +/− standard error of the mean (SEM) as detailed in each figure legend. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.
RESULTS
NT-4/5 administration reduces pyramidal cell loss in area CA3 following TBI
We examined the ability of a TrkB ligand, the mammalian neurotrophin NT-4/5, to protect hippocampal pyramidal neurons after experimental TBI. LFP-injured rats were infused with 2 μg/day of recombinant NT-4/5 (TBI/NT4, n=6) or the same volume of vehicle (TBI/VEH, n=6), beginning 30 minutes after the injury and continuing for 1 week. A control group of sham-injured animals was infused with vehicle only (SHAM/VEH, n=6). Two weeks after TBI, the number of CA2/3 pyramidal neurons was estimated on cresyl violet-stained coronal brain sections using the optical fractionator method.
Brain injury induced substantial pyramidal neuronal death in the CA2/CA3 subfield, which was significantly ameliorated by NT-4/5 administration (Figure 1-A). Animals in the TBI/VEH group lost approximately 45% of pyramidal neurons in the CA2/3 region studied, compared to the SHAM/VEH group (48512 ± 5142 cells in TBI/VEH vs 88957 ± 11620 cells in SHAM/VEH, mean ± SD) (Figure 1-B). NT-4/5 administration reduced pyramidal cell death at 2 weeks, resulting in survival of 71% of CA2/3 pyramidal neurons compared to 55% in TBI/VEH (63088 ± 14445 cells in TBI/NT4). A one-way ANOVA test revealed that the mean values of the three groups (SHAM/VEH, TBI/VEH, TBI/NT4) were significantly different from each other [F(2, 15)=20.5, p<0.001]. Subsequent testing of the difference between TBI/VEH and TBI/NT4 showed a statistically significant difference using an unpaired t-test (P < 0.05) and a Tukey test (P < 0.05). Because of the small group sizes (n=6 per group), we conducted a further nonparametric test of the difference in CA3 neuron number in the TBI/VEH and TBI/NT4 groups: a permutation test was performed to create a reference distribution for the test statistic (Phillip, 2005). Using this approach we obtained a p value of less than 0.03. These results demonstrate that early and prolonged administration of NT-4/5 significantly improves pyramidal cell survival in the CA2/3 subfield of the hippocampus following experimental TBI.
Figure 1. NT-4/5 administration reduces hippocampal pyramidal cell loss following traumatic brain injury (TBI) in rats.
(A) Photomicrographs of area CA3 in cresyl violet-stained brain sections from (left panel) SHAM/VEH; (center panel) TBI/VEH; (right panel) TBI/NT4. Bar, 100 microns. (B and C) Hippocampus pyramidal cell number was estimated 2 weeks following LFP TBI in sham animals treated with vehicle (black column; n=6), TBI animals treated with vehicle (white column; n=6) and TBI animals treated with NT-4/5 (grey column; n=6). Percentages are normalized to vehicle-treated sham animals. (B) In the CA2/3, 45% cell death was observed in TBI animals treated with vehicle. This cell death was reduced to 29% in animals treated with NT-4/5. (C) In the hilus of the dentate gyrus, 34% cell loss occurred in TBI animals treated with vehicle and 19% in animals treated with NT-4/5. Data are presented as mean ± SD (†: P<0.05 vs TBI/VEH; *: P <0.05, **: P <0.01, ***: P <0.001 vs SHAM/VEH).
Brain injury also caused significant cell loss in the hilus of the dentate gyrus when compared to sham-injured animals (7475± 1642 cells in TBI/VEH vs 11323 ± 3284 cells in SHAM/VEH, P<0.05). Hilar cell death appeared to be slightly improved by NT-4/5 administration but the difference did not reach significance (9118 ± 1854 cells in TBI/NT4) (Figure 1-C). We performed immunostaining for NT-4/5 to determine the targeted regions of the infused recombinant protein. At 30hr post-infusion, NT-4/5 protein had diffused ventrally from the cannula tip throughout the primary target, the hippocampal CA region, but had spread only sparsely into the hilar region (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Distribution of infused NT-4/5.

Immunohistochemistry for NT-4/5 was performed on coronal brain sections harvested 30h after brain cannula and osmotic pump implantation. NT-4/5 diffused several millimeters away from the tip of the cannula symbolized by the bar, into part of the parietal cortex and corpus callosum and throughout most of the ipsilateral hippocampus. Scale bar represents 1 mm. Cx: cortex; Th: Thalamus; Hi: hippocampus. Inset: Area CA of the hippocampus of an animal infused with vehicle. This section was immunostained for NT-4/5 in parallel as a control for specificity of NT-4/5 staining.
Rescued CA3 neurons do not undergo delayed degeneration
To address the concern that NT-4/5 administration had merely delayed cell death, we evaluated Fluorojade-B (FJB) histofluorescence on brain sections at 2 weeks post-TBI. After experimental TBI in rats, FJB staining peaks on the first day post-injury and declines thereafter to nearly undetectable levels in the hippocampus by 14 days (Sato et al., 2001, Hallam et al., 2004, Anderson et al., 2005). If NT-4/5 treatment had delayed cell death, we would expect more staining in the TBI/NT4 group than the TBI/VEH group at the 2 week time point. However, FJB staining was not increased in any area of the hippocampus in the NT-4/5-treated animals. Very low levels of staining (typically 1-5 FJB-positive cells per section) were present in the CA1 and CA2/3 subfields of the hippocampus and slightly more staining in the dentate gyrus and hilus of TBI/VEH animals (Figure 3), indicating that the cells rescued by NT-4/5 infusion did not undergo delayed degeneration.
Figure 3. Hippocampal neuronal cell death 2 weeks following traumatic brain injury (TBI) was not delayed by NT-4/5 infusion.
Semi-quantitative analysis of cell death was evaluated using Fluorojade-B staining. Scarce cell death was observed in the ipsilateral hippocampus at 2 weeks following TBI, especially in the CA subfields. NT-4/5 administration was not associated with an increase in delayed cell death in CA, the dentate gyrus (DG) or the hilus. Data presented as mean ± SD (0= no cells; 1= 1-5 cells; 2= 6-20 cells; 3= more than 20 cells).
NT-4/5 treatment does not improve performance on hippocampal-dependent behavioral tasks
1. Visuo-spatial learning, anterograde paradigm
The Morris water maze is an accepted test of visuo-spatial learning in rodents. Anterograde learning was assessed by testing for the ability to learn to find a hidden platform over 6 trials, beginning at 1 week post-injury. All animals, regardless of injury and treatment status, exhibited a pattern of decreasing latencies to find the hidden platform in the maze over the six testing trials (Figure 4-A). Brain-injured animals showed a significant deficit in spatial learning ability compared to sham-injured animals at each trial, consistent with many previous reports of learning deficits in this model (reviewed in Thompson et al., 2005). Interestingly, NT-4/5 administration following LFP injury did not reduce the latency to platform for any of the 6 trials. At the end of the 6 trials, the SHAM/VEH animals located the platform after an average of 8 ± 1 s compared to 36 ± 4 s for TBI/VEH (P<0.001 vs SHAM/VEH) and 33 ± 3 s for TBI/NT4 (P<0.001 vs SHAM/VEH). It has been shown that LFP-injured and sham-injured rats do not differ in their swim speeds or paths in this model of TBI (Passineau et al., 2001, Lenzlinger et al., 2005).
Figure 4. NT-4/5 treatment does not improve behavioral and physiological deficit following traumatic brain injury (TBI) in rats.

(A) Anterograde visuo-spatial learning deficit was assessed in the Morris water maze (MWM) one week following TBI. The graph represents average latencies to find the platform over 6 testing blocks (2 blocks/day for 3 days; 4 trials/block). The learning curve of brain-injured animals show a significant deficit regardless of treatment. Data presented as mean ± SEM in seconds. (B) Probe trial scores of animals tested in the Morris water maze at 10 days after TBI. The deficit observed in brain-injured animals was unaffected by the NT-4/5 treatment. Data presented as mean ± SEM in arbitrary units. (C) Retrograde amnesia resulting from TBI was assessed using contextual fear conditioning (CFC) in animals trained 24 h prior to injury and tested 2 weeks after injury. The injury caused significantly less freezing behavior when animals were placed back in the test cage, while NT-4/5 treatment had no effect. (D) No injury or treatment effect was observed when animals were placed in a new context, as expected. Data presented as mean ± SEM in percentage of time over the 5 min observation period. (E) Neuromotor deficit in brain-injured animals was not altered by NT-4/5 administration. (F) Exploratory behavior was evaluated 2 weeks following TBI in a circular open field. Brain-injured animals showed a deficit in exploration regardless of treatment when compared to SHAM/VEH. (G) Hippocampus excitability was assessed in acutely isolated hippocampal slices in the Shaffer collateral to CA1 pathway (schematic adapted from http://www.bris.ac.uk/Depts/Synaptic/info/pathway/hippocampal.htm). Positions of the stimulating (STIM) and recording (REC) electrodes are shown. (H) Brain-injured animals showed an overall decrease in hippocampal excitability that was not improved by NT-4/5 administration. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. For all panels: *P <0.05; ** P <0.01; *** P <0.001 for TBI/VEH vs. SHAM/VEH; †P <0.05; †† P <0.01; ††† P <0.001 for TBI/NT4 vs. SHAM/VEH.
A probe trial was performed on day 10 at 24h following the last learning trial. Consistent with previous reports, there was a significant effect of brain injury (P<0.001 for TBI/VEH vs SHAM/VEH) but NT-4/5 treatment did not improve performance (Figure 4-B).
2. Associative learning, retrograde paradigm
Retrograde amnesia is a feature of human TBI. We hypothesized that brain-injured animals would show impairments in a model of retrograde amnesia, the contextual fear conditioning test. Foot shocks were administered to rats 24 hr before the injury/pump implantation. When returned to the context cage (in which the shocks were originally administered) at 14 days post-injury, SHAM/VEH rats responded by freezing on average 83% ± 5% of the 5 min observation period (Figure 4-C). In contrast, TBI/VEH rats froze only 51% ± 9% of the time (P<0.01 vs SHAM/VEH), suggesting that they had impaired recall of the association of the context with the painful stimulus. NT-4/5 administration did not improve the injury-induced retrograde memory impairment: TBI/NT4 rats froze 48% ± 8% of the time (P<0.01 vs SHAM/VEH, NS vs TBI/VEH). As a control for freezing behavior due to generalized fear, animals were then placed in a novel context and freezing behavior was measured. All groups demonstrated similar low levels of freezing (<10% of the observation period) when placed in a novel context (Figure 4-D).
3. Exploratory behavior and anxiety
Exploratory behavior was assessed using a modified version of the open field test at 13 days post-injury. The exploratory score of SHAM/VEH animals of 32 ± 6 entries across border zones was significantly higher than the score of TBI/VEH animals (14 ± 3, P<0.05). The TBI/NT4 group scored between the SHAM/VEH and TBI/VEH groups (19 ± 4) but this value was not significantly different from either group (Figure 4-F). Total distance path was comparable in all groups (data not shown).
Neurological motor function
Brain injury induced a significant deficit in gross motor function as assessed using a composite neuroscore from day 2 to day 14 post-injury when compared to sham injury, regardless of treatment status (Figure 4-E). NT-4/5 administration did not improve the neurological function of treated animals at any time point.
Behavioral scores of injured animals are uncorrelated with CA3 pyramidal neuron number
To further address the possibility that neuronal number is not correlated with function in injured animals, we analyzed those animals in each group for which both neuronal counts and behavioral scores were available (n=6/group). Regression analysis showed that, within the injured groups, neuron number was not correlated with the final MWM score, the probe trial score or the percent freezing time (Fig. 5A-F). This held true for TBI/VEH and TBI/NT4 analyzed separately and for all the TBI animals grouped together (TBI/ALL).
Figure. 5. Regression analysis of behavioral scores and neuron number.
Upper panels (A, C, E): For each behavioral test, the mean and one standard deviation of the full groups are shown. Individual scores are shown in circles (TBI/VEH, n=13-14) or triangles (TBI/NT4, n=16). Open circles or triangles indicate the six animals per group for which neuron counts were obtained; the neuronal counts are listed with the corresponding open symbol. Lower panels (B, D, F): Scatterplot graphs showing the data from only those animals in which both neuron counts and behavioral scores were obtained (n=6 per group). Behavioral scores for each test are plotted as a function of neuronal number for the TBI/VEH group (circles) and the TBI/NT4 group (triangles). There was no significant correlation between neuron number and any behavioral score (P>0.2 in all cases). This was true for the injured groups analyzed separately or together (TBI/ALL).
NT-4/5 administration does not reduce hippocampal hypoexcitability following TBI
We next determined the effects of LFP brain injury and NT-4/5 administration on the function of CA3 pyramidal neurons. Input/output curves were generated from hippocampal slices acutely isolated at 2 weeks post-injury. A stimulating electrode was placed in the Shaffer collateral pathway (CA3 output) and excitability was recorded in the target CA1 dendritic region (Figure 4-G). In SHAM/VEH animals (n=23 slices), the mean fEPSP slope increased with stimulation intensity. The entire input/output curve from TBI/VEH animals (n=28 slices) was decreased by 16% on average when compared to SHAM/VEH animals, suggesting that this region is hypoexcitable following TBI (Figure 4-H). Treatment with NT-4/5 (n=25 slices) did not offset the TBI-induced decrease in excitability (17% decrease on average for TBI/NT4 vs SHAM/VEH).
DISCUSSION
We have confirmed that infusion of recombinant NT-4/5 is neuroprotective for CA3 pyramidal neurons after experimental TBI (Royo et al., 2006). In addition, this study shows that the cellular protection is not reflected by an improvement in behavioral or electrophysiological measures, suggesting that post-injury protection of pyramidal neurons does not ensure a corresponding recovery of hippocampal function.
Hippocampal damage has been documented in human TBI cases, and the resulting impairments in learning and memory are common, long-lasting and debilitating. These issues have led our group and many others to use hippocampal-dependent behavioral tests in rodent models to examine cognitive recovery from experimental TBI. The lateral fluid percussion model of TBI in the rat causes extensive cell loss in the hippocampus (Cortez et al., 1989, Lowenstein et al., 1992, Hicks et al., 1993, Smith et al., 1994, Hicks et al., 1996, Smith et al., 1997a, Pierce et al., 1998, Grady et al., 2003, Royo et al., 2006), an area which has been shown to play a central role in both the standard MWM learning paradigm and the contextual fear conditioning test (Hamm et al., 1993, Gewirtz et al., 2000, LeDoux, 2000, Anagnostaras et al., 2001, Sanders et al., 2003, Bannerman et al., 2004). Indeed, we confirmed a significant injury effect in both the MWM and CFC tests, consistent with many previous studies (for example Smith et al., 1991, Witgen et al., 2005). Although injury-induced cell death disrupts the circuit initially, our data call into question a causal relationship between protection of the CA3 neurons and post-injury performance in the MWM. Several groups have reported a treatment-related improvement in learning and/or memory after experimental TBI in conjunction with CA3 neuronal survival (Sanderson et al., 1999, Leoni et al., 2000, Kline et al., 2001, Philips et al., 2001, Floyd et al., 2002, Kline et al., 2002, Lee et al., 2004, Ozdemir et al., 2005, Statler et al., 2006). However, other reports have clearly documented learning deficits in brain-injured animals in the absence of discernable hippocampal damage (Lyeth et al., 1990) or the converse, an improvement in MWM performance after injury without CA3 neuroprotection (Dixon et al., 2003, Hoover et al., 2004).
We speculate that circuit function in the hippocampus ipsilateral to the injury may not be responsible for improvements in behavioral scores seen in the studies cited above. TBI-induced cell loss in CA3 causes a sharp (60%) loss of synaptic contacts in CA1 dendritic fields, but even a dramatic recovery of normal-appearing CA1 synapses after TBI (up to nearly 75% of preinjury levels by 60 days post-injury) was not reflected by the MWM acquisition scores (Scheff et al., 2005). Although cognitive tests such as the Morris water maze depend on an intact hippocampus, damage to other regions may also impair performance (reviewed in D'Hooge and De Deyn, 2001). Therefore, these intriguing results provide further evidence that a post-injury improvement on some behavioral tests could be due to plasticity in other brain regions rather than functional recovery of the injured hippocampal circuit.
Analysis of our own data showed that CA3 pyramidal cell number and behavioral outcomes were uncorrelated in injured animals. We addressed the concern that the MWM and CFC behavioral tests might not be sensitive enough to distinguish cell rescue by examining hippocampal circuit function directly, using electrophysiological recording in acutely isolated slices. Our data show that CA3 output is significantly impaired by the injury, as shown previously (Reeves et al., 1997, D'Ambrosio et al., 1999, Witgen et al., 2005), but is not improved by NT-4/5 treatment. It has previously been demonstrated that area CA1 decreased excitability caused by lateral fluid percussion injury does not appear to be mediated by presynaptic mechanisms but rather is due to augmented inhibition and deceased postsynaptic glutamatergic receptor function (Schwarzbach et al., 2006). In addition to decreased CA3 output and decreased CA1 excitability, other injury-induced changes to hippocampal excitability include loss of LTP induction, lack of post-tetanic potentiation in area CA1 ipsilateral to the injury and decreased paired-pulse inhibition. Fiber volley amplitude and LTD remain unaffected and the effect on paired-pulse facilitation may depend on the model used (Reeves et al., 1995, Reeves et al., 1997, Reeves et al., 2000, Schwarzbach et al., 2006). These parameters may be useful to examine in future studies of neuroprotective agents.
Our work therefore adds to a growing literature suggesting that cell survival, as measured by histological techniques (Nissl stain, FJB), is not sufficient to predict functional improvement as measured by standard techniques used by many groups in the field. More detailed electrophysiological analysis would be useful, with the caveat that single cell recordings could be difficult to interpret because “rescued” CA3 neurons cannot be distinguished from the rest of the CA3 neurons in an acutely isolated hippocampal slice at present. In addition, behavioral tests that more precisely reflect the function of CA3 neurons may be warranted (Nakazawa et al., 2002, Nakazawa et al., 2003).
It is unknown how long the rescued CA3 neurons persist in an inactive state. Fluoro-Jade staining showed that pyramidal cell death was not merely delayed by NT-4/5 treatment, suggesting that the rescued cells are likely to persist and may regain function over time as axonal transport is reestablished. Besides promoting cell survival, another possible role for NT-4/5 is suggested by the finding that continuous NT-4/5 administration promotes plasticity in hippocampal slice cultures by increasing spontaneous excitatory post-synaptic currents and the growth-associated protein GAP-43 (Schwyzer et al., 2002). Dumas and Sapolsky have pointed out that “little is accomplished if spared neurons do not function normally afterward” (Dumas and Sapolsky, 2001). We believe it is important to determine whether these rescued neurons eventually undergo functional recovery at later times post-injury or whether their function is permanently impaired and the neuroprotection is to no avail.
The mammalian neurotrophins include NGF, BDNF, NT-4/5 and NT3. The NT-4/5 gene codes for a 26-kDa homodimeric protein of 123 amino acids, sharing 54% homology with BDNF (Ip et al., 1992, Ibanez, 1996, Salin et al., 1997). Although NT-4/5 and BDNF are both high-affinity ligands for the TrkB receptor, the two neurotrophins have distinct biological activities in the nervous system (Klein et al., 1992, Curtis et al., 1995, McAllister et al., 1995, Ryden et al., 1995, Strohmaier et al., 1996, Minichiello et al., 1998), and some populations of neurons require NT-4/5 but not BDNF for survival (Ardelt et al., 1994, Conover et al., 1995, Liu et al., 1995, Riddle et al., 1995). Furthermore, replacing the spatio-temporal expression pattern of BDNF with NT4/5 by ‘knocking-in’ NT4/5 to the BDNF locus does not rescue all of the deficits, providing direct evidence that the two neurotrophins have some non-overlapping actions (Fan et al., 2000). Interestingly, infusion of NT-4/5 but not BDNF is neuroprotective after LFP-TBI (Blaha et al., 2000, Royo et al., 2006). The mechanisms for this difference may include partially different binding sites on the trkB receptor (Klein et al., 1992), differential activation of a particular shc domain on the cytoplasmic portion of the trkB receptor (Minichiello et al., 1998), and/or differential downregulation of trkB (Frank et al., 1996, Knusel et al., 1997).
The specific mechanism by which NT-4/5 protects CA3 neurons after LFP-TBI has not yet been determined, but NT-4/5 signaling is known to interact with neuronal survival pathways. CA3 pyramidal neurons and hilar interneurons express the TrkB receptor (Yan et al., 1997) and the levels of TrkB in area CA3 are unaffected by LFP-TBI (Hicks et al., 1998, Royo et al., 2006). Signaling through the TrkB receptor activates the PLCγ/IP3/DAG, PI3K/Akt and MAPK/RSK pathways, promoting both cytoplasmic and nuclear events that contribute to cell survival (reviewed in Chao, 2003). We are currently characterizing BDNF- and NT-4/5-regulated genes in the injured brain and investigating the possibility of differential gene regulation by the two neurotrophins.
Numerous compounds have been tested for histological and functional neuroprotection in animal models of TBI, and a few of the successful studies showing neuroprotection and/or improvement in the Morris water maze have provided preclinical data for human trials. Pharmacologic strategies have included blocking calcium channels and the NMDA receptor and inhibiting lipid peroxidation, free radical generation and inflammation, among many others (see Maas, 2001, Maas et al., 2005). Unfortunately, to date, no neuroprotective agent has shown efficacy in a clinical trial in TBI patients (reviewed in Maas et al., 1999, Narayan et al., 2002, Tolias and Bullock, 2004). We propose that a more mechanistic understanding of cognitive recovery after TBI will prove to be very important in evaluating new compounds intended for future clinical trials.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Dr. Asla Pitkänan for numerous helpful discussions, Dr. Nicolaj Siggelkow for assistance with regression analysis, and Dr. M. Sean Grady for support and mentorship. We thank Marie Millard and LiYa Yu for outstanding technical support and Brent Witgen for critical review of the manuscript. This work was supported in part by University of Pennsylvania Department of Neurosurgery funds and NIH RO1-NS040978 (DJW), and NIH RO1-NS45975 (ASC).
Comprehensive List of Abbreviations
- aCSF
Artificial cerebrospinal fluid
- Akt
Akt or protein kinase B
- BDNF
Brain derived neurotrophic factor
- BSA
Bovine serum albumin
- CE
Coefficient of error
- CFC
Contexual fear conditioning
- CV
Coefficient of variance
- DAG
Diacylglycerol
- fEPSP
Field excitatory postsynpatic potential
- FJB
Fluoro-Jade B
- IP3
Inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate
- LFP
Lateral fluid percussion
- MAPK
Mitogen-activated protein kinase
- MWM
Morris water maze
- NT-4/5
Neurotrophin-4/5
- PBS
Phosphate-buffered saline
- PI3K
Phosphoinositide-3 kinase
- PLC□
Phospholipase C gamma
- RSK
Ribosomal S6 kinase
- TBI
Traumatic brain injury
REFERENCES
- Altar CA, Boylan CB, Fritsche M, Jackson C, Hyman C, Lindsay RM. The neurotrophins NT-4/5 and BDNF augment serotonin, dopamine, and GABAergic systems during behaviorally effective infusions to the substantia nigra. Exp Neurol. 1994;130:31–40. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1994.1182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anagnostaras SG, Gale GD, Fanselow MS. Hippocampus and contextual fear conditioning: recent controversies and advances. Hippocampus. 2001;11:8–17. doi: 10.1002/1098-1063(2001)11:1<8::AID-HIPO1015>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anderson KJ, Miller KM, Fugaccia I, Scheff SW. Regional distribution of fluorojade B staining in the hippocampus following traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 2005;193:125–130. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.11.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ardelt AA, Flaris NA, Roth KA. Neurotrophin-4 selectively promotes survival of striatal neurons in organotypic slice culture. Brain Res. 1994;647:340–344. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91333-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baldwin SA, Gibson T, Callihan CT, Sullivan PG, Palmer E, Scheff SW. Neuronal cell loss in the CA3 subfield of the hippocampus following cortical contusion utilizing the optical dissector method for cell counting. J Neurotrauma. 1997;14:385–398. doi: 10.1089/neu.1997.14.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bannerman DM, Rawlins JN, McHugh SB, Deacon RM, Yee BK, Bast T, Zhang WN, Pothuizen HH, Feldon J. Regional dissociations within the hippocampus--memory and anxiety. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28:273–283. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blaha GR, Raghupathi R, Saatman KE, McIntosh TK. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor administration after traumatic brain injury in the rat does not protect against behavioral or histological deficits. Neurosci. 2000;99:483–493. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00214-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carbonell WS, Grady MS. Regional and temporal characterization of neuronal, glial, and axonal response after traumatic brain injury in the mouse. Acta Neuropathologica. 1999;98:396–406. doi: 10.1007/s004010051100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chao MV. Neurotrophins and their receptors: a convergence point for many signalling pathways. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;4:299–309. doi: 10.1038/nrn1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colicos MA, Dash PK. Apoptotic morphology of dentate gyrus granule cells following experimental cortical impact injury in rats: possible role in spatial memory deficits. Brain Res. 1996;739:120–131. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(96)00824-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colicos MA, Dixon CE, Dash PK. Delayed, selective neuronal death following experimental cortical impact injury in rats: possible role in memory deficits. Brain Res. 1996;739:111–119. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(96)00819-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Conover JC, Erickson JT, Katz DM, Bianchi LM, Poueymirou WT, Mcclain J, Pan L, Helgren M, IP NY, Boland P, Friedman B, Wiegand S, Vejsada R, Kato AC, Dechiara TM, Yancopoulos GD. Neuronal deficits, not involving motorneurons, in mice lacking BDNF and/or NT4. Nature. 1995;375:235–238. doi: 10.1038/375235a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cortez SC, McIntosh TK, Noble LJ. Experimental fluid percussion brain injury: vascular disruption and neuronal and glial alterations. Brain Res. 1989;482:271–282. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(89)91190-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Curtis R, Adryan KM, Stark JL, Park JS, Compton DL, Weskamp G, Huber LJ, Chao MV, Jaenisch R, Lee KF, Lindsay RM, DiStefano PS. Differential role of the low-affinity neurotrophin receptor (p75) in retrograde axonal-transport of the neurotrophins. Neuron. 1995;14:1201–1211. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90267-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D'Ambrosio R, Maris DO, Grady MS, Winn HR, Janigro D. Impaired K(+) homeostasis and altered electrophysiological properties of post-traumatic hippocampal glia. J Neurosci. 1999;19:8152–8162. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-18-08152.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- D'Hooge R, De Deyn PP. Applications of the Morris water maze in the study of learning and memory. Brain Res Rev. 2001;36:60–90. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0173(01)00067-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dixon CE, Ma X, Kline AE, Yan HQ, Ferimer H, Kochanek PM, Wisniewski SR, Jenkins LW, Marion DW. Acute etomidate treatment reduces cognitive deficits and histopathology in rats with traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:2222–2227. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000080493.04978.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dumas TC, Sapolsky RM. Gene therapy against neurological insults: sparing neurons versus sparing function. Trends Neurosci. 2001;24:695–700. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(00)01956-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fan G, Egles C, Sun Y, Minichiello L, Renger JJ, Klein R, Liu G, Jaenisch R. Knocking the NT4 gene into the BDNF locus rescues BDNF deficient mice and reveals distinct NT4 and BDNF activities. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:350–357. doi: 10.1038/73921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Floyd CL, Golden KM, Black RT, Hamm RJ, Lyeth BG. Craniectomy position affects morris water maze performance and hippocampal cell loss after parasagittal fluid percussion. J Neurotrauma. 2002;19:303–316. doi: 10.1089/089771502753594873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frank L, Ventimiglia R, Anderson K, Lindsay RM, Rudge JS. BDNF down-regulates neurotrophin responsiveness, TrkB protein and TrkB mRNA levels in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 1996;8:1220–1230. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01290.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fujimoto ST, Longhi L, Saatman KE, McIntosh TK. Motor and cognitive function evaluation following experimental traumatic brain injury. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004;28:365–378. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gewirtz JC, McNish KA, Davis M. Is the hippocampus necessary for contextual fear conditioning? Behav Brain Res. 2000;110:83–95. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(99)00187-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Golarai G, Greenwood AC, Feeney DM, Connor JA. Physiological and structural evidence for hippocampal involvement in persistent seizure susceptibility after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci. 2001;21:8523–8537. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-21-08523.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grady MS, Charleston JS, Maris D, Witgen BM, Lifshitz J. Neuronal and glial cell number in the hippocampus after experimental traumatic brain injury: analysis by stereological estimation. J Neurotrauma. 2003;20:929–941. doi: 10.1089/089771503770195786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hallam TM, Floyd CL, Folkerts MM, Lee LL, Gong QZ, Lyeth BG, Muizelaar JP, Berman RF. Comparison of behavioral deficits and acute neuronal degeneration in rat lateral fluid percussion and weight-drop brain injury models. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:521–539. doi: 10.1089/089771504774129865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamm RJ, Lyeth BG, Jenkins LW, O'Dell DM, Pike BR. Selective cognitive impairment following traumatic brain injury in rats. Behav Brain Res. 1993;59:169–173. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(93)90164-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hicks R, Soares H, Smith D, McIntosh T. Temporal and spatial characterization of neuronal injury following lateral fluid-percussion brain injury in the rat. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1996;91:236–246. doi: 10.1007/s004010050421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hicks RR, Gennarelli TA, McIntosh TK. Kynurenate is neuroprotective following experimental brain injury in the rat. Brain Res. 1994;655:91–96. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91601-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hicks RR, Smith DH, Lowenstein DH, Saint Marie RL, McIntosh TK. Mild experimental brain injury in the rat induces cognitive deficits associated with regional neuronal loss in the hippocampus. J Neurotrauma. 1993;10:405–414. doi: 10.1089/neu.1993.10.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hicks RR, Smith DH, McIntosh TK. Temporal response and effects of excitatory amino acid antagonism on microtubule-associated protein 2 immunoreactivity following experimental brain injury in rats. Brain Res. 1995;678:151–160. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00179-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hicks RR, Zhang L, Dhillon HS, Prasad MR, Seroogy KB. Expression of trkB mRNA is altered in rat hippocampus after experimental brain trauma. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 1998;59:264–268. doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(98)00158-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoover RC, Motta M, Davis J, Saatman KE, Fujimoto ST, Thompson HJ, Stover JF, Dichter MA, Twyman R, White HS, McIntosh TK. Differential effects of the anticonvulsant topiramate on neurobehavioral and histological outcomes following traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21:501–512. doi: 10.1089/089771504774129847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ibanez CF. Neurotrophin-4: The odd one out in the neurotrophin family. 1996;21:787–793. doi: 10.1007/BF02532301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ip NY, Ibanez CF, Nye SH, McClain J, Jones PF, Gies DR, Belluscio L, Le Beau MM, Espinosa R, Squinto SP, Persson H, Yancopoulos G. Mammalian neurotrophin-4: Structure, chromosomal localization, tissue distribution, and receptor specificity. PNAS. 1992;89:3060–3064. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.7.3060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klein R, Lamballe F, Bryant S, Barbacid M. The Trkb tyrosine protein-kinase is a receptor for neurotrophin-4. Neuron. 1992;8:947–956. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90209-v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kline AE, Massucci JL, Marion DW, Dixon CE. Attenuation of working memory and spatial acquisition deficits after a delayed and chronic bromocriptine treatment regimen in rats subjected to traumatic brain injury by controlled cortical impact. J Neurotrauma. 2002;19:415–425. doi: 10.1089/08977150252932370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kline AE, Yu J, Horvath E, Marion DW, Dixon CE. The selective 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist repinotan HCl attenuates histopathology and spatial learning deficits following traumatic brain injury in rats. Neurosci. 2001;106:547–555. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00300-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knusel B, Gao H, Okazaki T, Yoshida T, Mori N, Hefti F, Kaplan DR. Ligand-induced down-regulation of Trk messenger RNA, protein and tyrosine phosphorylation in rat cortical neurons. Neurosci. 1997;78:851–862. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(96)00616-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kotapka MJ, Gennarelli TA, Graham DI, Adams JH, Thibault LE, Ross DT, Ford I. Selective vulnerability of hippocampal neurons in acceleration- induced experimental head injury. J Neurotrauma. 1991;8:247–258. doi: 10.1089/neu.1991.8.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kotapka MJ, Graham DI, Adams JH, Gennarelli TA. Hippocampal pathology in fatal non-missile human head injury. Acta Neuropathol. 1992;83:530–534. doi: 10.1007/BF00310031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LeDoux JE. Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2000;23:155–184. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee LL, Galo E, Lyeth BG, Muizelaar JP, Berman RF. Neuroprotection in the rat lateral fluid percussion model of traumatic brain injury by SNX-185, an N-type voltage-gated calcium channel blocker. Exp Neurol. 2004;190:70–78. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lenzlinger PM, Shimizu S, Marklund N, Thompson HJ, Schwab ME, Saatman KE, Hoover RC, Bareyre FM, Motta M, Luginbuhl A, Pape R, Clouse AK, Morganti-Kossmann C, McIntosh TK. Delayed inhibition of Nogo-A does not alter injury-induced axonal sprouting but enhances recovery of cognitive function following experimental traumatic brain injury in rats. Neurosci. 2005;134:1047–1056. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.04.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leoni MJ, Chen X-H, Cheney JA, McIntosh TK, Smith DH. NPS-1506 attenuates cognitive dysfunction and hippocampal neuron death following brain trauma in the rat. Exp Neurol. 2000;166:442–449. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2000.7513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X, Ernfors P, Wu H, Jaenisch R. Sensory but not motor-neuron deficits in mice lacking NT4 and BDNF. Nature. 1995;375:238–241. doi: 10.1038/375238a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowenstein DH, Thomas MJ, Smith DH, McIntosh TK. Selective vulnerability of dentate hilar neurons following traumatic brain injury: a potential mechanistic link between head trauma and disorders of the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 1992;12:4846–4853. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-12-04846.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lyeth BG, Jenkins LW, Hamm RJ, Dixon CE, Phillips LL, Clifton GL, Young HG, Hayes RL. Prolonged memory impairment in the absence of hippocampal cell death following traumatic brain injury in the rat. Brain Res. 1990;526:249–258. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91229-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maas A, Schouten JW, Teasdale GW. Neuroprotection in traumatic brain injury. In: Reilly PL, Bullock R, editors. Head Injury: Pathophysiology and management. Oxford University Press; New York: 2005. pp. 406–440. [Google Scholar]
- Maas AI. Neuroprotective agents in traumatic brain injury. Exp Opin Invest Drugs. 2001;10:753–767. doi: 10.1517/13543784.10.4.753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maas AIR, Steyerberg EW, Murray GD, Bullock R, Baethmann A, Marshall LF, Teasdale GM. Why have recent trials of neuroprotective agents in head injury failed to show convincing efficacy? A pragmatic analysis and theoretical considerations. Neurosurg. 1999;44:1286–1298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maxwell WL, Dhillon K, Harper L, Espin J, MacIntosh TK, Smith DH, Graham DI. There is differential loss of pyramidal cells from the human hippocampus with survival after blunt head injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003;62:272–279. doi: 10.1093/jnen/62.3.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McAllister AK, Lo DC, Katz LC. Neurotrophins regulate dendritic growth in developing visual cortex. Neuron. 1995;15:791–803. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90171-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McIntosh TK, Vink R, Noble L, Yamakami I, Fernyak S, Faden AI. Traumatic brain injury in the rat: Characterization of a lateral fluid percussion model. Neurosci. 1989;28:233–244. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(89)90247-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minichiello L, Casagranda F, Tatche RS, Stucky CL, Postigo A, Lewin GR, Davies AM, Klein R. Point mutation in trkB causes loss of NT4-dependent neurons without major effects on diverse BDNF responses. Neuron. 1998;21:335–345. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80543-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakazawa K, Quirk MC, Chitwood RA, Watanabe M, Yeckel MF, Sun LD, Kato A, Carr CA, Johnston D, Wilson MA, Tonegawa S. Requirement for hippocampal CA3 NMDA receptors in associative memory recall. Science. 2002;297:211–218. doi: 10.1126/science.1071795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nakazawa K, Sun LD, Quirk MC, Rondi-Reig L, Wilson MA, Tonegawa S. Hippocampal CA3 NMDA receptors are crucial for memory acquisition of one-time experience. Neuron. 2003;38:305–315. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00165-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Narayan RK, Michel ME, Ansell B, Baethmann A, Biegon A, Bracken MB, Bullock MR, Choi SC, Clifton GL, Contant CF, Coplin WM, Dietrich WD, Ghajar J, Grady SM, Grossman RG, Hall ED, Heetderks W, Hovda DA, Jallo J, Katz RL, Knoller N, Kochanek PM, Maas AI, Majde J, Marion DW, Marmarou A, Marshall LF, McIntosh TK, Miller E, Mohberg N, Muizelaar JP, Pitts LH, Quinn P, Riesenfeld G, Robertson CS, Strauss KI, Teasdale G, Temkin N, Tuma R, Wade C, Walker MD, Weinrich M, Whyte J, Wilberger J, Young AB, Yurkewicz L. Clinical trials in head injury. J Neurotrauma. 2002;19:503–557. doi: 10.1089/089771502753754037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- National Research Council . Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Academy Press; Washington, DC: 1996. [Google Scholar]
- O'Connor C, Heath DL, Cernak I, Nimmo AJ, Vink R. Effects of daily versus weekly testing and pre-training on the assessment of neurologic impairment following diffuse traumatic brain injury in rats. J Neurotr. 2003;20:985–993. doi: 10.1089/089771503770195830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozdemir D, Tugyan K, Uysal N, Sonmez U, Sonmez A, Acikgoz O, Ozdemir N, Duman M, Ozkan H. Protective effect of melatonin against head trauma-induced hippocampal damage and spatial memory deficits in immature rats. Neurosci Lett. 2005;385:234–239. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.05.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Passineau MJ, Green EJ, Dietrich WD. Therapeutic effects of environmental enrichment on cognitive function and tissue integrity following severe traumatic brain injury in rats. Exp Neurol. 2001;168:373–384. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2000.7623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Philips MF, Mattiasson G, Wieloch T, Bjorklund A, Johansson BB, Tomasevic G, Martinez-Serrano A, Lenzlinger PM, Sinson G, Grady MS, McIntosh TK. Neuroprotective and behavioral efficacy of nerve growth factor-transfected hippocampal progenitor cell transplants after experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2001;94:765–774. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.94.5.0765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phillip I. Good, Permutation, Parametric and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses. Springer; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Pierce JES, Smith DH, Trojanowski JQ, McIntosh TK. Enduring cognitive, neurobehavioral, and histopathological changes persist for up to one year following severe experimental brain injury in rats. Neurosci. 1998;87:359–369. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00142-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reeves TM, Kao CQ, Phillips LL, Bullock MR, Povlishock JT. Presynaptic excitability changes following traumatic brain injury in the rat. J Neurosci Res. 2000;60:370–379. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(20000501)60:3<370::AID-JNR12>3.0.CO;2-B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reeves TM, Lyeth BG, Phillips LL, Hamm RJ, Povlishock JT. The effects of traumatic brain injury on inhibition in the hippocampus and dentate gyrus. Brain Res. 1997;757:119–132. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00170-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reeves TM, Lyeth BG, Povlishock JT. Long-term potentiation deficits and excitability changes following traumatic brain injury. Exp Brain Res. 1995;106:248–256. doi: 10.1007/BF00241120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riddle DR, Lo DC, Katz LC. NT-4-Mediated rescue of lateral geniculate neurons from effects of monocular deprivation. Nature. 1995;378:189–191. doi: 10.1038/378189a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Royo NC, Conte V, Saatman KE, Shimizu S, Belfield CM, Soltesz KM, Davis JE, Fujimoto ST, McIntosh TK. Hippocampal vulnerability following traumatic brain injury: a potential role for neurotrophin-4/5 in pyramidal cell protection. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23:1089–1102. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04642.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryden M, Murrayrust J, Glass D, Ilag LL, Trupp M, Yancopoulos GD, Mcdonald NQ, Ibanez CF. Functional analysis of mutant neurotrophins deficient in low-affinity binding reveals a role for p75(Lngfr) in Nt-4 signaling. EMBO J. 1995;14:1979–1990. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb07190.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salin T, Timmusk T, Lendahl U, Metsis M. Structural and functional characterization of the rat neurotrophin-4 gene. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1997;9:264–275. doi: 10.1006/mcne.1997.0625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Salmond CH, Sahakian BJ. Cognitive outcome in traumatic brain injury survivors. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2005;11:111–116. doi: 10.1097/01.ccx.0000155358.31983.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanders MJ, Wiltgen BJ, Fanselow MS. The place of the hippocampus in fear conditioning. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003;463:217–223. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(03)01283-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanderson KL, Raghupathi R, Martin D, Miller G, McIntosh TK. Systemic administration of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) attenuates neuronal death and cognitive dysfunction but not neurological motor deficits following lateral fluid-percussion brain injury in the rat. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999;19:1118–1125. doi: 10.1097/00004647-199910000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sato M, Chang E, Igarashi T, Noble LJ. Neuronal injury and loss after traumatic brain injury: time course and regional variability. Brain Res. 2001;917:45–54. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(01)02905-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scheff SW, Price DA, Hicks RR, Baldwin SA, Robinson S, Brackney C. Synaptogenesis in the hippocampal CA1 field following traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:719–732. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwarzbach E, Bonislawski DP, Xiong G, Cohen AS. Mechanisms underlying the inability to induce area CA1 LTP in the mouse after traumatic brain injury. Hippocampus. 2006;16:541–550. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schwyzer L, Mateos JM, Abegg M, Rietschin L, Heeb L, Thompson SM, Luthi A, Gahwiler BH, McKinney RA. Physiological and morphological plasticity induced by chronic treatment with NT-3 or NT-4/5 in hippocampal slice cultures. Eur J Neurosci. 2002;16:1939–1948. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2002.02259.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sinson G, Perri BR, Trojanowski JQ, Flamm ES, McIntosh TK. Improvement of cognitive deficits and decreased cholinergic neuronal cell loss and apoptotic cell death following neurotrophin infusion after experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 1997;86:511–518. doi: 10.3171/jns.1997.86.3.0511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sinson G, Voddi M, McIntosh TK. Nerve growth factor administration attenuates cognitive but not neurobehavioral motor dysfunction or hippocampal cell loss following fluid-percussion brain injury in rats. J Neurochem. 1995;65:2209–2216. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1995.65052209.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skelton RW, Ross SP, Nerad L, Livingstone SA. Human spatial navigation deficits after traumatic brain injury shown in the arena maze, a virtual Morris water maze. Brain Inj. 2006;20:189–203. doi: 10.1080/02699050500456410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith DH, Chen X-H, Pierce JES, Wolf JA, Trojanowski JQ, Graham DI, McIntosh TK. Progressive atrophy and neuronal death for one year following brain trauma in the rat. J Neurotrauma. 1997a;14:715–727. doi: 10.1089/neu.1997.14.715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith DH, Chen XH, Xu BN, McIntosh TK, Gennarelli TA, Meaney DF. Characterization of diffuse axonal pathology and selective hippocampal damage following inertial brain trauma in the pig. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997b;56:822–834. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith DH, Lowenstein DH, Gennarelli TA, McIntosh TK. Persistent memory dysfunction is associated with bilateral hippocampal damage following experimental brain injury. Neurosci Lett. 1994;168:151–154. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90438-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith DH, Okiyama K, Thomas MJ, Claussen B, McIntosh TK. Evaluation of memory dysfunction following experimental brain injury using the Morris water maze. J Neurotrauma. 1991;8:259–269. doi: 10.1089/neu.1991.8.259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Statler KD, Alexander H, Vagni V, Holubkov R, Dixon CE, Clark RS, Jenkins L, Kochanek PM. Isoflurane exerts neuroprotective actions at or near the time of severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. 2006;1076:216–224. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Strohmaier C, Carter BD, Urfer R, Barde YA, Dechant G. A splice variant of the neurotrophin receptor trkB with increased specificity for brain-derived neurotrophic factor. EMBO J. 1996;15:3332–3337. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tate DF, Bigler ED. Fornix and hippocampal atrophy in traumatic brain injury. Learn Mem. 2000;7:442–446. doi: 10.1101/lm.33000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson HJ, LeBold DG, Marklund N, Morales DM, Hagner AP, McIntosh TK. Cognitive evaluation of traumatically brain-injured rats using serial testing in the Morris water maze. Rest Neurol Neurosci. 2006;24:109–114. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson HJ, Lifshitz J, Marklund N, Grady MS, Graham DI, Hovda DA, McIntosh TK. Lateral fluid percussion brain injury: a 15-year review and evaluation. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:42–75. doi: 10.1089/neu.2005.22.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tolias CM, Bullock MR. Critical appraisal of neuroprotection trials in head injury: what have we learned? NeuroRx. 2004;1:71–79. doi: 10.1602/neurorx.1.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- West MJ, Slomianka L, Gundersen HJ. Unbiased stereological estimation of the total number of neurons in thesubdivisions of the rat hippocampus using the optical fractionator. Anat Rec. 1991;231:482–497. doi: 10.1002/ar.1092310411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Witgen BM, Lifshitz J, Smith ML, Schwarzbach E, Liang SL, Grady MS, Cohen AS. Regional hippocampal alteration associated with cognitive deficit following experimental brain injury: a systems, network and cellular evaluation. Neurosci. 2005;133:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.01.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yan Q, Radeke MJ, Matheson CR, Talvenheimo J, Welcher AA, Feinstein SC. Immunocytochemical localization of TrkB in the central nervous system of the adult rat. J Comp Neurol. 1997;378:135–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



