Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the association between p53 codon 72 polymorphism (R72P) and the risk of colorectal liver metastases. Methods: The p53 R72P genotype was identified by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method in 78 consecutive colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases and 214 age- and sex-matched cases with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. Results: The R allele of the p53 R72P polymorphism was more frequently found in metastatic cases than in nonmetastatic cases (P=0.075). Carriers of the 72R allele had a 2.25-fold (95% CI (confidence interval)=1.05~4.83) increased risk of liver metastases. On the stratification analysis, 72R-carrying genotype conferred a 3.46-fold (95% CI=1.02~11.72) and a 1.05-fold (95% CI=0.36~3.08) increased risk of liver metastases for p53 overexpression-positive and negative colorectal cancers, respectively. Conclusion: These results demonstrate for the first time that the 72R allele of the p53 polymorphism has an increased risk for liver metastases in colorectal cancers positive for p53 overexpression.
Keywords: Colorectal cancer, p53, Genetic polymorphism, Liver metastases, Overexpression
INTRODUCTION
Liver metastasis is the most common cause of colorectal cancer-related mortality (Burke and Allen-Mersh, 1996). It is now known that multiple risk factors contribute to the development of liver metastases, including sex, age, colorectal tumor features, and a variety of genetic abnormalities involved in invasion and metastases (Adachi et al., 1999; Ogawa et al., 2005; Ghadjar et al., 2006; Kuramochi et al., 2006; Manfredi et al., 2006; Shinji et al., 2006; Herynk et al., 2007; Lin et al., 2007). Here, we investigated the effect of a common p53 polymorphism (R72P) on colorectal liver metastases in a Chinese population.
p53 tumor suppressor gene is a potential candidate for modulating the risk of colorectal liver metastases. Several studies showed that an increased incidence of p53 mutation and related overexpression of the gene are associated with liver metastases of colorectal tumors (Kastrinakis et al., 1995; Kimura et al., 1996; Kang et al., 1997), suggesting a role for p53 in the establishment of colorectal liver metastases. It has been proposed that wild-type p53 has an antiangiogenic effect, possibly by up-regulation of the angiogenesis inhibitor thrombospondin-1 (Dameron et al., 1994). However, mutant p53 was found to stimulate vascular endothelial growth factor production (Kieser et al., 1994). Moreover, a positive correlation between p53 mutations and intratumoral microvessel density was found in colorectal cancers (Vermeulen et al., 1996; Kang et al., 1997; Liang et al., 2004) and liver metastases (de Jong et al., 2005). These data suggest that in primary colorectal cancers, p53 mutations are associated with a pro-angiogenic state and, thus, with a higher chance of liver metastases.
p53 gene has a common polymorphism that results in either arginine (R) or proline (P) at codon 72. Functional differences between the two polymorphic forms have been described previously (Lanham et al., 1998; Thomas et al., 1999; Dumont et al., 2003). The 72R allele of mutant p53 has been found to have greater ability to bind p73, neutralizing p73-induced apoptosis, when compared to the mutant 72P allele (Marin et al., 2000). Moreover, the 72R allele is preferentially mutated and retained in various human tumors arising in RP germline heterozygotes (Marin et al., 2000; Kawaguchi et al., 2000; Tada et al., 2001; Langerod et al., 2002; Papadakis et al., 2002; Anzola et al., 2003; Schneider-Stock et al., 2004a; Hsieh et al., 2005). Recently a positive association of the 72R allele with p53 overexpression has been reported in esophageal cancer tissue (Lee et al., 2006). Furthermore, the 72R allele has been associated with increased tumor stages in urinary tract cancers (Furihata et al., 2002) and colorectal cancers (Schneider-Stock et al., 2004b; Perez et al., 2006). These results indicate that the p53 P and R alleles at 72 codon are functionally distinct, which may influence cancer progression and metastases. To the best of our knowledge, data on association of the p53 R72P polymorphism with colorectal liver metastases are presently not available.
In the present study, we examined the association between p53 R72P polymorphism and the risk of colorectal liver metastases in a case-case study of 78 patients with colorectal liver metastases and 214 age- and sex-matched cases with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer in a Chinese population. We also examined whether the potential association of p53 R72P polymorphism with the risk of colorectal liver metastases differs according to p53 overexpression status in colorectal cancer tissue.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients
This study included 78 consecutive colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases and 214 age- and sex-matched cases with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer as a control. All patients were recruited between 2003 and 2005 at No. 113 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army and Lihuili Hospital in Ningbo, China. Final diagnosis of all colorectal adenocarcinoma was confirmed by histopathological examination. Diagnosis and presence of liver metastases were based on: (1) positive findings on cytological or pathological examination, and/or (2) positive images on angiogram, ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cases with liver metastases diagnosed within 3 months after the initial diagnosis of colorectal cancer were considered to have synchronous liver metastases.
Data on all patients were obtained from medical records, pathology reports and personal interviews with the patients. The data collected include sex, age, and colorectal tumor features such as tumor size, tumor location, histological grade, depth of invasion, and lymph node metastasis. Information on p53 overexpression was available from 239 patients (76 with liver metastases). Fifty-one cases in nonmetastases group and 2 in metastases group did not undergo surgery because of economic or other reasons, and their colorectal cancer diagnosis was based only on biopsy. Therefore, these cases were excluded from analysis of p53 overexpression owing to too small cancer tissues. Immunohistochemical staining for p53 was performed on paraffin-embedded sections using mouse anti-human p53 monoclonal mutant protein (DO-7, Dako, Denmark). Samples were considered positive when 10% of the cancer cells were positive for p53 staining. Each subject provided written consent to participate in the study and to donate a 5 ml blood sample for genetic testing. The research protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of two participant hospitals (No. 113 Hospital of People’s Liberation Army and Lihuili Hospital in Ningbo, China).
Genotyping
Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes by proteinase K digestion and phenol/chloroform extraction. Molecular analysis for the p53 R72P genotypes was performed as previously described (Zhu et al., 2005). Briefly, it involved a combination of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and digestion with restriction endonuclease BstU I, followed by non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic analysis. PP homozygotes were represented by a DNA band of 199 bp in size, whereas RR homozygotes were represented by DNA bands of 113 and 86 bp. RP heterozygotes displayed a combination of both alleles (199, 113, and 86 bp). Genotyping results were further confirmed by direct DNA sequencing.
Statistical analysis
Differences in sex, age, and colorectal tumor features (including tumor size, tumor location, histological grade, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, and p53 overexpression) between groups with and without liver metastases were evaluated using the χ 2-test. The association between p53 R72P and the risk of colorectal liver metastases was estimated by computing the odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from multivariate logistic regression analyses with adjustment for potential risk factors. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was tested using the asymptotic Pearson’s χ 2-test. All statistical analyses were conducted using the Stata 9.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA) statistical package. All tests were two-sided at the 0.05 significance level.
RESULTS
The selected characteristics of the colorectal cancer patients are shown by metastases/nonmetastases status in Table 1. Distributions of sex, age, tumor location, tumor size, histological grade and p53 overexpression were not significantly different in patients with and without metastases. The patients with liver metastases were more likely to have deeper tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis compared with those without metastases.
Table 1.
Variables | Nonmetastases, n | Metastases, n | Pa |
Sex | 0.915 | ||
Female | 70 (32.7%) | 25 (32.1%) | |
Male | 144 (67.3%) | 53 (67.9%) | |
Age | 0.931 | ||
≤60 years | 114 (53.3%) | 42 (53.8%) | |
>60 years | 100 (46.7%) | 36 (46.2%) | |
Colorectal tumor size | 0.180 | ||
≤4 cm | 99 (46.3%) | 43 (55.1%) | |
>4 cm | 115 (53.7%) | 35 (44.9%) | |
Colorectal tumor locationb | 0.299 | ||
Proximal colon | 72 (34.1%) | 31 (40.8%) | |
Distal colorectum | 139 (65.9%) | 45 (59.2%) | |
Colorectal tumor gradeb | 0.168 | ||
Well | 43 (20.4%) | 8 (10.7%) | |
Moderately | 109 (51.6%) | 43 (57.3%) | |
Poorly | 59 (28.0%) | 24 (32.0%) | |
Depth of tumor invasionbc | 0.004 | ||
T1 or T2 | 71 (33.8%) | 13 (16.7%) | |
T3 or T4 | 139 (66.2%) | 65 (83.3%) | |
Lymph node metastasisb | <0.001 | ||
Negative | 131 (63.9%) | 21 (30.9%) | |
Positive | 74 (36.1%) | 47 (69.1%) | |
p53 overexpressionb | 0.107 | ||
Negative | 89 (54.6%) | 33 (43.4%) | |
Positive | 74 (45.4%) | 43 (56.6%) |
χ 2-test was used to test statistically significant differences between groups;
Numbers not add up to the total, owing to missing data;
Depth of tumor invasion corresponds to the T (tumor) description according to the TNM (tumor-nodes-metastasis) classification
Genetic data are summarized in Table 2. The p53 R72P genotype distributions in both metastases and nonmetastases patients were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P>0.05). The 72R allele was found more often in patients with metastases than in those without metastases, although the results did not reach statistical significance (P=0.075). When compared with PP homozygotes, the adjusted ORs of colorectal liver metastases were 2.38 (95% CI=1.08~5.24, P=0.031) for RP heterozygotes, 1.94 (95% CI=0.77~4.91, P=0.160) for RR homozygotes, and 2.25 (95% CI=1.05~4.83, P=0.038) for carriers of the 72R allele (RP or RR genotype).
Table 2.
p53 R72P | Nonmetastases, n | Metastases, n | ORa | Pa |
PP | 60 (28.0%) | 11 (14.1%) | 1.00 | |
RP | 105 (49.1%) | 47 (60.3%) | 2.38 (95% CI=1.08~5.24) | 0.031 |
RR | 49 (22.9%) | 20 (25.6%) | 1.94 (95% CI=0.77~4.91) | 0.160 |
R allele | 203 (47.4%) | 87 (55.8%) | ||
PP | 60 (28.0%) | 11 (14.1%) | 1.00 | |
R carriers | 154 (72.0%) | 67 (85.9%) | 2.25 (95% CI=1.05~4.83) | 0.038 |
Adjusted for the depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis
The p53 R72P genotype distributions in the metastases and nonmetastases stratified by p53 overexpression in colorectal cancer tissue are shown in Table 3. The risk of liver metastases associated with the 72R-carrying genotype appeared to be stronger in patients with colorectal tumors overexpressing p53 (OR=3.46, 95% CI=1.02~11.72, P=0.046), whereas no significant association was found in patients whose tumors did not overexpress p53 (OR=1.05, 95% CI=0.36~3.08, P=0.935). A similar magnitude of the ORs was observed when the patients were stratified by sex, age, tumor size, location, histological grade, depth of invasion, and lymph node metastasis (data not shown).
Table 3.
p53 overexpression | p53 R72P | Nonmetastases, n | Metastases, n | ORa | Pa |
Positive | PP | 20 (27.0%) | 4 (9.3%) | 1.00 | |
R carriers | 54 (73.0%) | 39 (90.7%) | 3.46 (95% CI=1.02~11.72) | 0.046 | |
Negative | PP | 18 (20.2%) | 7 (21.2%) | 1.00 | |
R carriers | 71 (79.8%) | 26 (78.8%) | 1.05 (95% CI=0.36~3.08) | 0.935 |
Adjusted for the depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis
DISCUSSION
We found that colorectal cancer patients with the 72R-carrying genotype of the p53 R72P polymorphism had a significantly increased risk of liver metastases when compared with those with PP genotype, and that this risk-effect is related to p53 overexpression in colorectal cancer tissue. Our data demonstrate for the first time a statistically significant association between p53 R72P and the risk of colorectal liver metastases in patients whose tumors overexpress p53. In line with our results, Brooks et al.(2000) found that of the five metastatic vulval cancers, four expressed 72R p53 mutant proteins.
The exact underlying mechanism(s) responsible for our finding that the p53 72R allele has an increased risk for colorectal liver metastases in cancers positive for p53 overexpression still remains unclear. Several reports indicated that the 72R allele is preferentially mutated and retained in various human tumors (Kawaguchi et al., 2000; Marin et al., 2000; Tada et al., 2001; Langerod et al., 2002; Papadakis et al., 2002; Anzola et al., 2003; Schneider-Stock et al., 2004a; Hsieh et al., 2005), and is associated with the presence of p53 overexpression (Lee et al., 2006). In experiments, mutant 72R allele tended to block p73 function more effectively than mutant 72P isoform, which might lead to a higher tendency of p53 mutation in tumors (Marin et al., 2000). Thus the 72R allele may function as a mediator responsible for a progressive genetic instability, leading to a more malignant potential, including the capability of invasiveness and metastasization. Clinical response following cisplatin-based chemo-radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancers was reported to be influenced by this polymorphism, cancers expressing 72R mutants having lower response rates than those expressing 72P mutants (Bergamaschi et al., 2003). This result indicates that the 72R allele may limit individual responsiveness to cancer therapy, thereby contributing to cancer progression and metastases. Additional functional studies are needed in order to elucidate the role of p53 R72P polymorphism in the development of colorectal liver metastases.
The limitations of the current study should be borne in mind. This is a limited study because of small sample size and imbalance of tumor characteristics between metastases and nonmetastases. In addition, some misclassifications of metastases status are inevitable because a proportion of the colorectal cancer patients already have undetectable liver micrometastases at the time of diagnosis of primary tumor (Bosman, 1995). In the present study, cases with liver metastases diagnosed within 3 months after the initial diagnosis of colorectal cancer were considered to have synchronous liver metastases and classified into the metastases group. Another limitation is that no data about p53 mutation of primary colorectal tumors were available. Immunoreactivity of monoclonal antibodies to p53 is not considered to adequately predict the presence of p53 mutations (Coggi et al., 1997; Lee et al., 2006). However, this may not lead to a bias for a conclusion that concerns colorectal cancers positive for p53 overexpression, since p53 overexpression detected by immunohistochemistry is usually regarded as the presence of p53 mutation. We, therefore, report for the first time that the R allele of the p53 R72P polymorphism has an increased risk for colorectal liver metastases in cancers positive for p53 overexpression. Future studies are needed to further clarify the role of p53 codon 72 polymorphism in liver metastases of colorectal cancers.
Footnotes
Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30470791) and the Medical Science and Technology Research Foundation for the 11th Five-Year Program of People’s Liberation Army, Nanjing Branch, China (No. 06MA27)
References
- 1.Adachi Y, Inomata M, Kakisako K, Sato K, Shiraishi N, Kitano S. Histopathologic characteristics of colorectal cancer with liver metastasis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42(8):1053–1056. doi: 10.1007/BF02236702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Anzola M, Cuevas N, Lopez-Martinez M, Saiz A, Burgos JJ, de Pancorbo MM. Frequent loss of p53 codon 72 Pro variant in hepatitis C virus-positive carriers with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2003;193(2):199–205. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3835(03)00046-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bergamaschi D, Gasco M, Hiller L, Sullivan A, Syed N, Trigiante G, Yulug I, Merlano M, Numico G, Comino A, et al. p53 polymorphism influences response in cancer chemotherapy via modulation of p73-dependent apoptosis. Cancer Cell. 2003;3(4):387–402. doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00079-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bosman FT. Prognostic value of pathological characteristics of colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A(7-8):1216–1221. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00153-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brooks LA, Tidy JA, Gusterson B, Hiller L, O′Nions J, Gasco M, Marin MC, Farrell PJ, Kaelin WGJr, Crook T. Preferential retention of codon 72 arginine p53 in squamous cell carcinomas of the vulva occurs in cancers positive and negative for human papillomavirus. Cancer Res. 2000;60(24):6875–6877. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Burke D, Allen-Mersh TG. Colorectal liver metastases. Postgrad Med J. 1996;72(850):464–469. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.72.850.464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Coggi G, Bosari S, Roncalli M, Graziani D, Bossi P, Viale G, Buffa R, Ferrero S, Piazza M, Blandamura S, et al. p53 protein accumulation and p53 gene mutation in esophageal carcinoma. A molecular and immunohistochemical study with clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer. 1997;79(3):425–432. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970201)79:3<425::AID-CNCR1>3.0.CO;2-H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dameron KM, Volpert OV, Tainsky MA, Bouck N. Control of angiogenesis in fibroblasts by p53 regulation of thrombospondin-1. Science. 1994;265(5178):1582–1584. doi: 10.1126/science.7521539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.de Jong KP, Gouw AS, Peeters PM, Bulthuis M, Menkema L, Porte RJ, Slooff MJ, van Goor H, van den Berg A. p53 mutation analysis of colorectal liver metastases: relation to actual survival, angiogenic status, and p53 overexpression. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(11):4067–4073. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dumont P, Leu JI, Della Pietra AC3rd, George DL, Murphy M. The codon 72 polymorphic variants of p53 have markedly different apoptotic potential. Nat Genet. 2003;33(3):357–365. doi: 10.1038/ng1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Furihata M, Takeuchi T, Matsumoto M, Kurabayashi A, Ohtsuki Y, Terao N, Kuwahara M, Shuin T. p53 mutation arising in Arg72 allele in the tumorigenesis and development of carcinoma of the urinary tract. Clin Cancer Res. 2002;8(5):1192–1195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ghadjar P, Coupland SE, Na IK, Noutsias M, Letsch A, Stroux A, Bauer S, Buhr HJ, Thiel E, Scheibenbogen C, et al. Chemokine receptor CCR6 expression level and liver metastases in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(12):1910–1916. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.1822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Herynk MH, Zhang J, Parikh NU, Gallick GE. Activation of Src by c-Met overexpression mediates metastatic properties of colorectal carcinoma cells. J Exp Ther Oncol. 2007;6(3):205–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hsieh LL, Huang TH, Chen IH, Liao CT, Wang HM, Lai CH, Liou SH, Chang JT, Cheng AJ. p53 polymorphisms associated with mutations in and loss of heterozygosity of the p53 gene in male oral squamous cell carcinomas in Taiwan. Br J Cancer. 2005;92(1):30–35. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kang SM, Maeda K, Onoda N, Chung YS, Nakata B, Nishiguchi Y, Sowa M. Combined analysis of p53 and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in colorectal carcinoma for determination of tumor vascularity and liver metastasis. Int J Cancer. 1997;74(5):502–507. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19971021)74:5<502::AID-IJC4>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kastrinakis WV, Ramchurren N, Rieger KM, Hess DT, Loda M, Steele G, Summerhayes IC. Increased incidence of p53 mutations is associated with hepatic metastasis in colorectal neoplastic progression. Oncogene. 1995;11(4):647–652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kawaguchi H, Ohno S, Araki K, Miyazaki M, Saeki H, Watanabe M, Tanaka S, Sugimachi K. p53 polymorphism in human papillomavirus-associated esophageal cancer. Cancer Res. 2000;60(11):2753–2755. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kieser A, Weich HA, Brandner G, Marme D, Kolch W. Mutant p53 potentiates protein kinase C induction of vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Oncogene. 1994;9(3):963–969. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kimura O, Sugamura K, Kijima T, Makino M, Shirai H, Tatebe S, Ito H, Kaibara N. Flow cytometric examination of p53 protein in primary tumors and metastases to the liver and lymph nodes of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(12):1428–1433. doi: 10.1007/BF02054534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kuramochi H, Hayashi K, Uchida K, Miyakura S, Shimizu D, Vallbohmer D, Park S, Danenberg KD, Takasaki K, Danenberg PV. Vascular endothelial growth factor messenger RNA expression level is preserved in liver metastases compared with corresponding primary colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(1):29–33. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Langerod A, Bukholm IR, Bregard A, Lonning PE, Andersen TI, Rognum TO, Meling GI, Lothe RA, Borresen-Dale AL. The TP53 codon 72 polymorphism may affect the function of TP53 mutations in breast carcinomas but not in colorectal carcinomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11(12):1684–1688. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lanham S, Campbell I, Watt P, Gornall R. p53 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer. Lancet. 1998;352(9140):1631. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61083-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lee JM, Shun CT, Wu MT, Chen YY, Yang SY, Hung HI, Chen JS, Hsu HH, Huang PM, Kuo SW, et al. The associations of p53 overexpression with p53 codon 72 genetic polymorphism in esophageal cancer. Mutat Res. 2006;594(1-2):181–188. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liang JT, Huang KC, Jeng YM, Lee PH, Lai HS, Hsu HC. Microvessel density, cyclo-oxygenase 2 expression, K-ras mutation and p53 overexpression in colonic cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91(3):355–361. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lin HM, Chatterjee A, Lin YH, Anjomshoaa A, Fukuzawa R, McCall JL, Reeve AE. Genome wide expression profiling identifies genes associated with colorectal liver metastasis. Oncol Rep. 2007;17(6):1541–1549. doi: 10.3892/or.17.6.1541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Manfredi S, Lepage C, Hatem C, Coatmeur O, Faivre J, Bouvier AM. Epidemiology and management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2006;244(2):254–259. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217629.94941.cf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Marin MC, Jost CA, Brooks LA, Irwin MS, O′Nions J, Tidy JA, James N, McGregor JM, Harwood CA, Yulug IG, et al. A common polymorphism acts as an intragenic modifier of mutant p53 behaviour. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):47–54. doi: 10.1038/75586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ogawa M, Ikeuchi K, Watanabe M, Etoh K, Kobayashi T, Takao Y, Anazawa S, Yamazaki Y. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase 7, laminin and type IV collagen-associated liver metastasis in human colorectal cancer: immunohistochemical approach. Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52(63):875–880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Papadakis ED, Soulitzis N, Spandidos DA. Association of p53 codon 72 polymorphism with advanced lung cancer: the Arg allele is preferentially retained in tumours arising in Arg/Pro germline heterozygotes. Br J Cancer. 2002;87(9):1013–1018. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Perez LO, Abba MC, Dulout FN, Golijow CD. Evaluation of p53 codon 72 polymorphism in adenocarcinomas of the colon and rectum in La Plata, Argentina. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(9):1426–1429. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i9.1426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schneider-Stock R, Mawrin C, Motsch C, Boltze C, Peters B, Hartig R, Buhtz P, Giers A, Rohrbeck A, Freigang B, et al. Retention of the arginine allele in codon 72 of the p53 gene correlates with poor apoptosis in head and neck cancer. Am J Pathol. 2004;164(4):1233–1241. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63211-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schneider-Stock R, Boltze C, Peters B, Szibor R, Landt O, Meyer F, Roessner A. Selective loss of codon 72 proline p53 and frequent mutational inactivation of the retained arginine allele in colorectal cancer. Neoplasia. 2004;6(5):529–535. doi: 10.1593/neo.04178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shinji S, Naito Z, Ishiwata S, Ishiwata T, Tanaka N, Furukawa K, Suzuki H, Seya T, Matsuda A, Katsuta M, et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 14 expression in colorectal cancer is associated with liver and lymph node metastases. Oncol Rep. 2006;15(3):539–543. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tada M, Furuuchi K, Kaneda M, Matsumoto J, Takahashi M, Hirai A, Mitsumoto Y, Iggo RD, Moriuchi T. Inactivate the remaining p53 allele or the alternate p73 Preferential selection of the Arg72 polymorphism in cancers with recessive p53 mutants but not transdominant mutants. Carcinogenesis. 2001;22(3):515–517. doi: 10.1093/carcin/22.3.515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thomas M, Kalita A, Labrecque S, Pim D, Banks L, Matlashewski G. Two polymorphic variants of wild-type p53 differ biochemically and biologically. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19(2):1092–1100. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.2.1092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vermeulen PB, Roland L, Mertens V, van Marck E, de Bruijn EA, van Oosterom AT, Dirix LY. Correlation of intratumoral microvessel density and p53 protein overexpression in human colorectal adenocarcinoma. Microvasc Res. 1996;51(2):164–174. doi: 10.1006/mvre.1996.0018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhu ZZ, Cong WM, Liu SF, Xian ZH, Wu WQ, Wu MC, Gao B, Hou LF, Zhu GS. A p53 polymorphism modifies the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma among non-carriers but not carriers of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Cancer Lett. 2005;229(1):77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]