Summary
Mice deficient in interferon-γ (IFN-γ) inducible immunity-related GTPase, Irgm1, display defective host resistance to a variety of intracellular pathogens. This increased susceptibility to infection is associated with impaired IFN-γ-dependent macrophage microbicidal activity in vitro. Here, we show that Irgm1 also regulated the survival of mature effector CD4+ T lymphocytes by protecting them from IFN-γ-induced autophagic cell death. Mice deficient in both IFN-γ and Irgm1 were rescued from the lymphocyte depletion and increased mortality that occurs in single Irgm1–/– animals following mycobacterial infection. These studies reveal a feedback mechanism in the TH1 response that limits the detrimental effects of IFN-γ on effector T lymphocyte survival while promoting the anti-microbial functions of IFN-γ.
Introduction
Robust expansion of antigen-specific peripheral lymphocytes through increased proliferation and survival is essential to maintain effector cell populations at a size sufficient to combat infection. Multiple pathways have been shown to regulate the persistence of activated lymphocytes. In the case of CD4+ T cells, duration and strength of T cell receptor (TCR) stimulation as well as expression of co-stimulatory molecules all play a role in promoting lymphocyte survival1–3 whereas activation of programmed cell death (PCD) pathways eliminates activated T cells. Homeostatic regulation of T lymphocyte survival is thought to be mediated primarily through the induction of apoptotic (type I) cell death4,5. Autophagy, a biological process known to promote cellular homeostasis in response to nutrient starvation, is frequently observed in dying cells and has been implicated as a mechanism of death in variety of differentiated cell types6,7. Nevertheless, the role of this type II cell death pathway in PCD has been controversial8,9 and there has been little direct evidence for its participation in the death of activated T lymphocytes10,11.
Although CD4+ T cell effector functions are ultimately linked to their ability to accumulate at the site of infection and to produce different classes of antimicrobial cytokines, such as IFN-γ (http://www.signaling-gateway.org/molecule/query?afcsid=A001238), interleukin 4 (IL-4) and IL-17, the impact of the cytokine milieu on CD4+ T cell survival has only recently been appreciated12–14. IFN-γ produced by activated T and NK cells is essential for host resistance to many bacterial, parasitic and viral pathogens and in addition plays a role in promoting TH1 differentiation. Importantly, IFN-γ signaling in cultured CD4+ T lymphocytes is also known to be anti-proliferative as well as pro-apoptotic and therefore detrimental for cell survival15,16. Consistent with these in vitro findings, IFN-γ-deficient mice show increased numbers of activated lymphocytes in both infectious and autoimmune disease settings17,18. However, even in the presence of high concentrations of IFN-γ produced during TH1 responses, effector CD4+ T lymphocytes clearly accumulate at sites of infection, suggesting that activated CD4+ T cells possess strategies for escaping suppression by IFN-γ. Although down-regulation of IFN-γ receptor expression has been suggested as one mechanism that protects TH1 lymphocytes from IFN-γ-dependent inhibition19,20, this process occurs only in fully differentiated TH1 cells and thus does not explain how developing T cells survive and proliferate in the presence of autocrine and paracrine IFN-γ during early stages of the response.
IFN-γ induces the expression of a broad array of genes in both hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells. A set of these genes strongly induced by the cytokine encodes the p47 kDa GTPase family21,22. One family member, Irgm1 (also known as LRG47) has been shown to be essential for IFN-γ-dependent resistance to a wide variety of different intracellular bacterial and protozoan pathogens23. Although Irgm1 clearly controls the fate of pathogens in IFN-γ-activated macrophages by promoting phagolysosome maturation and autophagy24,25, this is not its only function in host resistance. Mycobacterium avium26 and Trypanosoma cruzi27 infected Irgm1–/– mice develop a profound pancytopenia, a defect that we have recently shown to be associated with impaired expansion of Irgm1–/– hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell populations28. However, these hematopoietic abnormalities are unlikely to be the sole explanation for the rapid development of lymphopenia seen in infected Irgm1–/– mice. Adult-thymectomized mice do not show a profound depletion in effector CD4+ T cells for a prolonged period following mycobacterial infection29, indicating that the existing peripheral pool can transiently sustain lymphocyte numbers without further input of progenitors. The latter observation suggested to us that lymphopenia observed in infected Irgm1–/– mice could also be due to decreased survival of mature effector cells.
Here, we have addressed the role of Irgm1 in the IFN-γ dependent regulation of cell survival in the periphery. Focusing on CD4+ T lymphocytes we show that IFN-γ induced Irgm1 was critical for the survival of activated mature lymphocytes since in the absence of Irgm1, IFN-γ triggered the death of these cells. Importantly, the lymphopenia and mortality previously observed in M. avium-infected Irgm1–/– animals was completely abrogated in Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– double-deficient mice. These findings reveal an unexpected regulatory function for Irgm1 in lymphocyte survival and suggest that the GTPase is essential for the peripheral expansion of immune effector cell populations during TH1 responses to intracellular pathogens. Since in our experiments death of Irgm1–/– CD4+ T lymphocytes was shown to involve an autophagic rather than apoptotic mechanism, our findings also reveal an unexpected role for IFN-γ induced autophagy in PCD of activated T lymphocytes.
Results
Activated CD4+ T cells fail to expand in the absence of Irgm1
To analyze a mature leukocyte population that undergoes extensive proliferation during infection and plays a role in host resistance, we focused on the CD4+ T lymphocyte compartment of the Irgm1-deficient animals and examined whether mature CD4+ T cells from these animals exhibit defects in proliferation or survival following TCR triggering. Naive wild-type or Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cells were sorted by flow cytometry and stimulated with agonistic CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the presence of irradiated syngenic wild-type splenocytes (Fig. 1a) or alternatively with irradiated allogeneic wild-type splenocytes (mixed leukocyte reactions) (Supplementary Fig. 1 online) and thymidine incorporation measured 3 days later. We found that Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cells incorporated less thymidine than wild-type cells in response to both stimuli. To determine whether Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cells exhibit similar defects in response to specific antigen, we crossed Irgm1–/– mice with ovalbumin (OVA) TCR transgenic OT-II mice to generate Irgm1–/– OT-II animals. When stimulated with splenic dendritic cells (DCs) pulsed with either OVA protein or peptide OVA(323–339), Irgm1-deficient OT-II cells again displayed substantially reduced thymidine incorporation (Fig. 1b). Further experiments were then carried out to determine whether this impaired thymidine uptake was due to reduction in viable T cell numbers or a defect in DNA synthesis. Kinetic studies revealed that Irgm1–/– OT-II cells displayed decreased thymidine incorporation to OVA peptide at all time-points analyzed after 24h (Fig. 1c) and that this defect correlated with a steady decline of CD4+ T cell numbers in the cultures (Fig. 1d). However, the Irgm1–/– cells showed unimpaired DNA synthesis as measured by BrdU at 72h incorporation at the single cell level (Fig. 1e). These lymphocytes also displayed normal up-regulation of CD25 and production of IL-2 (Fig. 1e,f). Importantly, biochemical analysis showed that Irgm1 deficiency did not affect multiple TCR-dependent signaling events associated with the activation (tyrosine and ERK phosphorylation) and survival (IκBα degradation for NF-κB activation and Akt phosphorylation) of CD4+ T cells (Supplementary Fig. 2 online). In addition, supernatants from peptide-stimulated wild-type OT-II cultures failed to rescue the impaired thymidine incorporation of Irgm1–/– cells, suggesting that this behavior did not result from a deficiency in the production or depletion of soluble factor (s) required for T cell expansion (data not shown). Finally, the Irgm1-dependent defect was observed only upon TCR triggering since Irgm1–/– lymphocytes did not show reduced viability relative to wild-type cells when cultured in medium only (Supplementary Fig. 3a online). Together, these observations reveal that although dispensable for activation and DNA synthesis, intrinsic expression of Irgm1 is essential for the expansion of CD4+ T lymphocytes following TCR stimulation.
Figure 1.

Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cell populations fail to expand following TCR engagement. 3H thymidine incorporation of (a) wild-type (WT) or Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cells activated with soluble anti-CD3 mAb and irradiated syngenic WT splenocytes, (b) OT-II or Irgm1–/– OT-II CD4+ T cells stimulated with OVA protein or peptide in the presence of syngenic splenic DC, was measured at 72 h. Kinetic analysis of (c)3H thymidine incorporation and (d) cell numbers in OVA(323-339) peptide stimulated OTII or Irgm1–/– OT-II splenic cultures. (e) Flow cytometric analysis of T cell activation and proliferation. OVA peptide stimulated OT-II or Irgm1–/– OT-II CD4+ T cells were pulsed with BrdU during the final 4 of 72 h culture and then co-stained with mAb to CD25 and BrdU. The numbers indicate the percentage of viable CD4+ cells. (f) IL-2 produced by OT-II (open bar) or Irgm1–/– OT-II (closed bar) CD4+ T cells stimulated with OVA peptide in the presence of splenic DC measured at 72 h by ELISA. Data shown are the mean concentration (± SD) of triplicate cultures. Results shown are the mean c. p. m. (a–c) or viable cell numbers (d) (± SD) of triplicate cultures. Data are representative of more than five (a, b) or three (c–f) independent experiments with similar results.
Expansion defects of Irgm1–/– CD4+ cells is IFN-γ-dependent
Irgm1 expression in most cell types previously studied has been shown to be interferon-dependent. We found that Irgm1 protein expression in anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 stimulated CD4+ T cells from naive wild-type mice was inhibited in the presence of IFN-γ mAb (Fig. 2a), indicating that induction of the protein in activated CD4+ T lymphocytes required IFN-γ. As predicted from this finding, Irgm1 was strongly induced in Irgm1-sufficient TH1 but not TH2 cells and its expression in the former T cell subset was maintained for at least 8 days after activation (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Although Irgm1 was preferentially expressed in TH1 cells, Irgm1-deficient CD4+ T cells exhibited unimpaired IFN-γ production in response to OVA peptide under either non-polarized or TH1 conditions (Fig. 2b) and showed no defects in TH1 or TH2 differentiation in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 3c). However, we consistently observed decreased numbers of Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cells upon activation as compared to wild-type cells following primary (Figs. 1,2c) and secondary (Fig. 2d) peptide stimulation under non-polarized or TH1 conditions (both associated with IFN-γ production). In contrast, expansion of OT-II cell populations under TH2 condition was minimally affected by Irgm1 deficiency. The failure of the OT-II cells to proliferate upon secondary stimulation was not due to impaired cell cycle progression but instead was a consequence of increased death of dividing CD4+ T cells as shown by 5,6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) and propidium iodide (PI) co-labeling experiments (Fig. 2e).
Figure 2.

Irgm1 is essential for the expansion of CD4+ T cells in the presence of IFN-γ. (a) Immunoblot analysis of expression of Irgm1 in WT CD4+ T cells. FACS-sorted naive CD4+ lymphocytes were activated with immobilized agonistic CD3 (10 μg/ml) and CD28 (2 μg/ml) mAb in the presence or absence of IFN-γ neutralizing mAb for 48 h and lysates prepared. (b) Concentrations of IFN-γ produced by OT-II (open bars) or Irgm1–/– OT-II (closed bars) CD4+ T cells stimulated with OVA peptide in the presence of splenic DC under polarized or non-polarized (N) conditions in 72 h cultures were measured by ELISA. Data shown are the mean concentration (± SD) of triplicate cultures. ND: not detected. (c) Accumulation of polarized and non-polarized OT-II (open symbols) or Irgm1–/– OT-II (closed symbols) CD4+ T cells following peptide stimulation quantified by viable cell count. (d) Viable cell numbers of OT-II (open bars) or Irgm1–/– OT-II (closed bars) CD4+ T cells 72 h after restimulation with OVA peptide in the presence of T cell-depleted APCs. (e) Flow cytometric analysis of viability and division of OT-II or Irgm1–/– OT-II CD4+ T cells 72 h after secondary peptide stimulation. Peptide-stimulated OT-II or Irgm1–/– OT-II CD4+ T cells were rested in IL-2 for 7 days, and then CFSE-labeled and restimulated with OVA peptide in the presence of T cell-depleted APCs. (f) Flow cytometric analysis of expansion of CFSE-labeled OTII or Irgm1–/– OT-II CD4+ T cells activated with OVA peptide in the presence of absence of IFN-γ neutralizing mAb. (g)3H thymidine incorporation of WT, Irgm1–/–, Ifng–/–, Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– CD4+ T cells stimulated with soluble agonistic CD3 mAb and irradiated syngenic Ifng–/– splenocytes for 72 h. Results are the mean viable cell numbers (c, d) or c.p.m. (g) (± SD) of triplicate cultures. FACS analysis was performed after gating on CD4+ T cells and the numbers indicate the percentage of CD4+ cells (e, f). All data shown are representative of two independent experiments with similar results.
The above experiments suggest that the survival defect of Irgm1–/– CD4+ lymphocytes was associated with the presence of IFN-γ. We next examined the effect of IFN-γ blockade on antigen-driven CD4+ cell survival. OVA peptide stimulated Irgm1–/– OTII cultures exhibited a reduction in the percentage of viable dividing cells (38%) relative to Irgm1-sufficient OTII cultures (71%). The addition of neutralizing IFN-γ mAb to the Irgm1–/– OTII cultures resulted in an increased accumulation of dividing cells (71%) with a concurrent reduction in the percentage of dead PI+ cells from 27% to 15% (Fig. 2f). To confirm this finding in a setting in which IFN-γ is completely absent, we crossed Ifng–/– and Irgm1–/– mice to generate animals deficient in both genes. Sorted naive wild-type, Irgm1–/–, Ifng–/–, Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– CD4+ T cells were stimulated with CD3 mAb in the presence of irradiated Ifng–/– antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and thymidine incorporation assayed 72 h later. We found that in contrast to Irgm1–/– cells, Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– CD4+ lymphocytes exhibited unimpaired thymidine uptake comparable to the responses displayed by wild-type or Ifng–/– CD4+ T cells (Fig. 2g). Together, these data established that IFN-γ inhibits expansion of activated CD4+ T cell populations in the absence of Irgm1.
Since in contrast to IFN-γ sufficient Irgm1–/– CD4+ T lymphocytes, activated Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– CD4+ T cell populations were able to undergo TCR-driven expansion in vitro, we were able to assess the role of Irgm1 in the post-activation survival of CD4+ T cells in vivo. In these experiments, in vitro anti-CD3 activated Ifng–/– and Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– CD4+ T cells (CD45.2+) were adoptively transferred into wild-type congenic (CD45.1+) recipients previously infected with Toxoplasma gondii or M. avium, two pathogens known to potently induce IFN-γ responses. When the numbers of donor CD4+ T cells were compared in the peritoneum (Fig. 3a) or spleen (data not shown) 4 days post-transfer by flow cytometry, we found that while comparable cell numbers were recovered in naive recipients, Irgm1-deficient CD4+ T lymphocytes displayed decreased survival relative to Irgm1-sufficient cells in recipients infected with either pathogen, indicating that intrinsic expression of Irgm1 in peripheral CD4+ T cells is required for their survival during pathogen-driven TH1 responses.
Figure 3.
Irgm1 promotes cell survival during pathogen-driven TH1 responses and prevents IFN-γ-dependent mortality in mycobacteria-infected mice. (a) Survival of CD4+ T cells in vivo. CD45.2+Ifng–/– (open symbols) or Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– (closed symbols) CD4+ lymphocytes pre-activated with agonistic CD3 mAb in vitro were transferred i.p. into congenic CD45.1+ C57BL/6.SJL recipients that were left untreated or inoculated i.p. with T. gondii or M. avium 3 days earlier. Percentage of donor CD4+ T cells in PEC collected at day 4 after transfer was determined by flow cytometry. (b) Survival of M. avium infected WT or KO mice (n = 5 per genotype) was monitored through the course of infection. (c) Splenic bacterial loads, (d) circulating and (e) splenic lymphocyte numbers were determined at wk4 after M. avium infection (n = 5). Data shown are representative of two independent experiments with each symbol representing an individual mouse.
Detrimental effects of IFN-γ in M. avium-infected Irgm1–/– mice
To test the hypothesis that Irgm1 protects lymphocytes and other cells from inhibition mediated by IFN-γ in vivo, wild-type, Irgm1–/–, Ifng–/– and Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– C57BL/6 mice were i.v. infected with M. avium and survival, bacterial loads and hematological responses were monitored. While all Irgm1–/–mice succumbed to the infection at approximately 40 days post-infection (p.i.), Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– animals displayed 100% survival throughout the course of these experiments (Fig. 3b). As described previously30,31Ifng–/– mice failed to show increased mortality during the same period. Although significantly higher than those in wild-type C57BL/6 mice, bacterial loads in Irgm1–/–, Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– and Ifng–/– animals were indistinguishable (Fig. 3c), indicating that the increased mortality of Irgm1–/– mice cannot be explained solely by uncontrolled bacterial infection. Instead, in agreement with our previous findings26 the decreased survival of infected Irgm1–/– mice was associated with a marked lymphopenia as well as a less pronounced generalized pancytopenia (Supplementary Table 1 online). Nevertheless, CD4+ T cell activation was unimpaired since infected wild-type and Irgm1–/– mice showed comparable increases in the percentage of activated CD44hiCD62LloCD4+ T cells in spleens prior to undergoing lymphopenia (Supplementary Fig. 4 online). Importantly, the subsequent reduction in total lymphocyte as well as CD4+ T cell counts was not observed in infected Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– or Ifng–/– mice (Fig. 3d,e). Together, these data established that IFN-γ is essential for both the reduction in hematopoietic cells and early mortality of infected Irgm1–/– mice.
The dependency on IFN-γ of the lymphopenia and mortality observed in these TH1-skewed M. avium infected Irgm1–/– mice suggested that Irgm1 might play only a minimal role in in vivo host responses to TH2-inducing helminths where IFN-γ production is suppressed32. To test this hypothesis, wild-type, Irgm1–/–, Ifng–/– and Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– mice were infected with the parasitic trematode, Schistosoma mansoni, and host responses analyzed at 8 wks p.i. We found in contrast to our observations on M. avium infection, S. mansoni-exposed Irgm1–/– animals showed no increase in mortality when compared to infected wild-type control animals (Supplementary Fig. 5a online). Moreover, Irgm1–/– mice displayed normal circulating lymphocyte counts (Supplementary Fig. 5b) as well as other hematological parameters (data not shown). Importantly, schistosome-infected Irgm1–/– mice showed unimpaired granuloma formation and tissue fibrosis, two well characterized TH2-dependent pathological sequelae of infection32. Therefore, these data confirm Irgm1 has no major influence on the development of host cellular responses in a TH2 dominant setting.
IFN-γ directly triggers death of Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cells
To characterize the mechanism of IFN-γ dependent suppression of Irgm1–/– CD4+ lymphocytes, we examined the effects of exogenous IFN-γ on the division and death of anti-CD3 activated Ifng–/– and Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– CD4+ T cells. Irradiated Ifng–/– APCs were used in these experiments to completely exclude endogenous production of the cytokine. We found that thymidine incorporation by Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– but not Ifng–/– cells was profoundly inhibited in a dose-dependent manner by exogenous IFN-γ (Fig. 4a) and this inhibition was associated with reduced cell numbers in the Irgm1-deficient cultures (Fig. 4b), arguing that IFN-γ directly prevents the accumulation of CD4+ T cells. When T cell activation, division and viability of the above cultures were compared at 20 h, a time point prior to the first cell division, up-regulation of CD25 expression and PI staining were comparable in IFN-γ-exposed Ifng–/– and Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– CD4+ T lymphocytes, suggesting that IFN-γ does not inhibit the activation and survival of non-dividing Irgm1-deficient cells (Supplementary Fig. 6 online). After 48 h, Irgm1-sufficient and Irgm1-deficient CD4+ cells underwent similar numbers of divisions in the either presence or absence of IFN-γ. However, cell cycle progression in exogenous IFN-γ supplemented Irgm1–/– cultures was accompanied by an increase in dead PI+CFSE+CD4+ T cell populations, which was clearly evident at 48 h (27%) and continued to accumulate, reaching ∼50% of the total CD4+ T cells by 72 h (Fig. 4c). Thus, the enhanced death of proliferating cells appears to be a major factor limiting the expansion of Irgm1-deficient CD4+ T cell populations in the presence of IFN-γ. Consistent with this hypothesis, we observed that previously activated, IL-2 expanded Ifng–/–Irgm1–/– CD4+ lymphocytes are also highly susceptible to IFN-γ induced death (Fig. 4d). Since APCs were not present in the latter experimental setting, this observation further confirms a direct role of IFN-γ in the inhibition of Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cell survival.
Figure 4.
IFN-γ directly induces death of Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cells. (a)3H thymidine incorporation. Naive CD4+ lymphocytes were stimulated with agonistic CD3 mAb and IFN-γ–deficient irradiated APCs for 72 h. IL-2 (10 U/ml)) was added 24 h after initiation of the cultures. Data shown are the mean c.p.m. (± SD) of triplicate cultures. (b) Accumulation of CD4+ T cells in the presence of IFN-γ (5 U/ml) at 72 h. Data shown are the mean viable cell numbers (± SD) of triplicate cultures. (c) Flow cytometric analysis of cell viability and division. CD4+ T cells were CFSE-labeled and activated as in (a) with T-depleted Ifng–/– APCs in the presence or absence of IFN-γ (5 U/ml). The numbers shown are the percentage of CFSE+CD4+ T cell populations in the cultures. (d) IFN-γ (e) agonistic CD3 mAb and (f) FasL triggered death of Ifng–/– or Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– T cells that were previously activated with anti-CD3 mAb and expanded in IL-2 medium. The cell loss was determined 48 h after each treatment with PI staining. In a, b, d, e and f, open bars: Ifng–/–, closed bars: Irgm1–/–Ifng–/–. Data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results.
The increased IFN-γ-dependent death of Irgm1–/– cells cannot be explained by augmented cytokine signaling as we found that the duration and magnitude of STAT1 phosphorylation in either fresh isolated (Supplementary Fig. 7a online) or IL-2 expanded (Supplementary Fig. 7b) Irgm1-deficient CD4+ T lymphocytes was indistinguishable from wild-type cells. To address whether Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cells were more sensitive to TCR-induced cell death (TICD), we examined survival of IL-2 expanded CD4+ T cell populations upon restimulation with anti-CD3 and found that both Irgm1+/+ and Irgm1–/– CD4+ cells showed comparable susceptibility to TICD (Fig. 4e). In addition, Irgm1-deficient cells showed normal Fas and Fas ligand expression (data not shown) and were not more sensitive to Fas-dependent death signals than their wild-type counterparts in the presence or absence of IFN-γ (Fig. 4f). Therefore, neither TICD nor Fas plays a substantial role in the death of IFN-γ-treated Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cells.
Irgm1 prevents IFN-γ-induced autophagic death of CD4+ cells
To investigate the mechanism of IFN-γ-induced cell death in Irgm1–/– cells, we employed transmission electron microscopy to compare the morphology of IL-2-treated CD4+ T cells from Ifng–/– and Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– animals following addition of IFN-γ to the APC-free cultures. Although a few Irgm1–/– cells displayed evidence of end-stage apoptotic death as indicated by condensed chromatin and bleb-like structures, we observed many otherwise healthy appearing cells with significantly increased numbers of membrane-bound vacuoles closely resembling autophagosomes and autolysosomes in their morphology (Fig. 5a–d). Some Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– cells contained large number of vacuoles of diverse size and electron density (Fig. 5e) while others showed a near complete absence of cytoplasmic components (Fig. 5f). Further evidence for autophagosome formation was obtained in experiments analyzing the aggregation of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) in IFN-γ-exposed Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– cells transiently transfected with LC3 fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP-LC3) (Supplementary Fig. 8 online). In direct contrast to these observations supporting an autophagic death pathway, we found that IFN-γ-induced death of Irgm1-deficient cells was not prevented by the addition of the pan-caspase inhibitor, zVAD, or other blockers of apoptotic cell death including zIETD, BocD and zDEVD (Supplementary Fig. 9a online). In addition, no reproducible differences were observed in the expression of Bcl2 family members (Bax, Bak, Bim, Bid, Bcl2 and Mcl1) with known pro- or anti-apoptotic functions between Irgm1+/+ and Irgm1–/– cells in either the presence or absence of IFN-γ exposure in vitro (Supplementary Fig. 9b). In contrast, addition of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI(3)K) inhibitors Wortmannin or Ly294002 led to a dose-dependent partial reduction in IFN-γ-induced death in Irgm1–/– cell cultures (Fig. 5g), suggesting the involvement of PI3K-dependent autophagy in this process. Because the above pharmacologic agents have inherent toxic effects on the target cells and non-specifically inhibit other pathways, we further tested the involvement of autophagy by using siRNA to silence the expression of Beclin1 (ref. 33), a gene required for subcellular membrane condensation during the formation of autophagic vacuoles. We found that while knockdown of Beclin1 had no effect on the survival of Ifng–/– cells, it significantly prevented IFN-γ-induced cell death in Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– CD4+ T cells (Fig. 5h). These findings argue that in the absence of Irgm1, IFN-γ-mediated cell death results primarily from autophagy and this involves a caspase-independent mechanism distinct from that previously described for IFN-γ-dependent death of Igrm1-sufficient CD4+ T lymphocytes16.
Figure 5.
Irgm1 prevents IFN-γ induced death of CD4+ T cells by regulating autophagy. EM analysis of (a)Ifng–/– or (b - f)Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– CD4+ lymphocytes that have been exposed to IFN-γ (5 U/ml) for 30 h. Original magnification: ×1000. (c) A magnified view of the KO cell boxed in (b) with two autophagic vacuoles indicated with arrows heads; (d) the numbers of the vacuoles quantified blindly on 50 randomly selected EM sections with more than 400 cells. Each symbol represents one section; (e) a representative image of Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cells with numerous vacuoles containing dense materials and (f) two Irgm1–/– CD4+ cells with vacuolated cytoplasma. (g) IFN-γ-induced death of CD4+ T cells in the presence or absence of PI3K-inhibitors Wortamanin or Ly294002. Data are representative of three independent experiments. (h) IFN-γ induced death of Ifng–/– or Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– CD4+ T cells transfected with control or Beclin1 specific siRNA. Reduction in expression of the Beclin1 protein was measured by western blot. The data shown are means (± SD) of triplicate cultures and are representative of three independent experiments. Cell death (g, h) was determined 48 h after IFN-γ exposure by flow cytometry with PI staining.
Discussion
IFN-γ induces a large array of genes involving diverse anti-microbial, anti-proliferative and immunomodulatory functions. However, the regulatory mechanisms that determine the beneficial versus detrimental outcomes of the IFN-γ response are poorly understood. Here, we show that Irgm1, previously characterized as a critical determinant of host resistance to many intracellular bacteria and protozoan agents and as an effector molecule required for macrophage microbicidal activity24,25, plays a previously unrecognized role in IFN-γ-dependent susceptibility to infection by regulating the sensitivity of activated immune cells to suppression by the cytokine. Because Irgm1 itself is strongly induced by IFN-γ, we propose that it provides a positive feedback mechanism in the IFN-γ signaling pathway that is designed to prevent the detrimental effects of the cytokine on cell survival while preserving its anti-microbial functions. Our data also reveal the existence of an autophagic death program in lymphocytes that is dependent on IFN-γ signaling and is clearly distinct from the autophagic cell death mechanism previously described in macrophages which requires caspase inhibition and receptor interacting protein (RIP1) kinase induction7,34.
We have previously reported that Irgm1–/– mice develop profound lymphopenia associated with impaired self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells following exposure to pathogens28, suggesting impairment in lymphocyte replenishment. However, this defect alone cannot fully explain the rapid onset of lymphopenia occurring in infected Irgm1–/– mice. We show here that depletion of mature effector cells could also contribute to the hematopoietic abnormalities observed in infected Irgm1–/– mice. This increased cell loss in the periphery may also indirectly contribute to the observed lymphopenia by increasing the mobilization of progenitors from the bone marrow that would exacerbate hematopoietic failure. Therefore, we propose that Irgm1 plays a major role in maintaining lymphocyte homestasis during host IFN-γ responses by promoting the survival of effector cells. This activity of Irgm1 is likely to be particularly important in the establishment and maintenance of TH1 responses to persistent intracellular infections. Indeed, we failed to observe a similar function in a TH2-driven infection (S. mansoni) in vivo and TH2 polarized lymphocyte cultures in vitro. The above difference likely reflects the failure of Irgm1 to be induced in the IFN-γ deficient setting of a TH2 response. At a more general level, a regulatory mechanism comparable to that mediated by Irgm1, may not be necessary for TH2 responses. While both IL-4 and IFN-γ are important polarizing factors for TH differentiation, IL-4 in contrast to IFN-γ does not have the potential to suppress lymphocyte survival but rather serves as a T cell growth factor.
Both indirect and direct mechanisms have been proposed to explain the inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation or survival by IFN-γ14,16,18,35,36. An important indirect pathway involves the induction by the cytokine in APCs of nitric oxide and/or indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, two metabolic products that are thought to suppress both cycling and survival of activated T cells37,38. Since Irgm1 can shield T lymphocyte responses from IFN-γ mediated inhibition even in the absence of APCs, its major function is unlikely to involve protection from these reactive metabolites. Instead, the target of Irgm1 regulation is more likely to be a process that protects T cell from direct inhibition by IFN-γ. Previously described mechanisms of this type include the down-regulation of IFN-γ receptor expression that occurs in differentiated TH1 cells19,20 and the inhibition of IFN-γ induced STAT1 phosphorylation by TCR stimulation39. Our observation that STAT1 phosphorylation occurred normally in IFN-γ stimulated Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cells and was down-regulated following TCR engagement (data not shown) argues against both of the latter mechanisms. Similarly, although the induction requirements and regulatory activity of Irgm1 resemble those of suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 (SOCS1), a known interferon-inducible regulator of IFN-γ signaling, Irgm1 appears to exert distinct regulatory functions when compared to SOCS1. Thus, while both molecules promote host survival by preventing IFN-γ-dependent pathological responses40 and are preferentially expressed in TH1 CD4+ T cells41, Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cells did not display the broad hyper-responsiveness (e.g., hyper-proliferation and dysregulated cytokine production) observed in their Socs1–/– counterparts42. Moreover, the duration and magnitude of tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT1 was not enhanced in IFN-γ stimulated Irgm1–/– CD4+ T cells, in direct contrast to the augmented STAT1 phosphorylation previously described for SOCS1 deficiency43. Thus, the target of the IFN-γ-induced activity of Irgm1 is likely to be either downstream of STAT1 or involve a JAK-STAT independent signaling pathway such as that mediated by PI(3)K44,45.
IFN-γ has been shown to potentiate Fas-dependent TCR-induced cell death in an in vitro model in which the effect of IFN-γ was seen during TCR restimulation only in the absence of accessory cells15 and was shown to be dependent on caspase-8 activation16. In contrast, as shown here, repeated TCR ligation, a critical step for revealing the previously described inhibitory effects of IFN-γ on CD4+ T cell survival, is not required for cytokine-induced death of Irgm1–/– cells. Furthermore, Irgm1-deficient cells are not more sensitive to Fas-dependent TICD in either the presence or absence of IFN-γ. Instead, our study reveals that Irgm1 exerts its major effects on CD4+ cell survival by regulating IFN-γ-dependent autophagic cell death. Although originally recognized as an essential cell survival response to starvation, autophagy has now been shown to play a more general role in maintaining cellular homeostasis46,47. IFN-γ is a potent stimulus of autophagy in macrophages and plays an important role in the clearance of pathogens in these cells25,48. In that setting, Irgm1 has been shown to promote rather than inhibit autophagy as observed in the IFN-γ-stimulated T cells studied here. This distinction may reflect the fact that macrophages in contrast to CD4+ T cells are terminally differentiated non-dividing cells in which autophagy is utilized as a specialized anti-microbial effector mechanism in addition to its more generalized role in cellular homeostasis and survival. Interestingly, in macrophages autophagic cell death occurs only when apoptosis is inhibited7,34. In contrast, we observe IFN-γ can induce autophagic death of Irgm1–/– CD4+ T lymphocytes in the presence of intact apoptotic machinery. Thus, IFN-γ induced autophagy may play distinct roles in the innate and adaptive immune systems with Irgm1 as a central regulator of this process exerting either positive or negative effects depending on its cellular context.
Our findings demonstrate that a single GTPase, Irgm1, can dictate the beneficial outcome of the IFN-γ response by providing a feedback mechanism essential for protecting activated CD4+ lymphocytes from IFN-γ-mediated death. It should be emphasized, however, that based on our previous work on the role of Irgm1 in regulating the stress response of hematopoetic stem cells, the GTPase is likely to serve a similar function in other IFN-γ responsive cell lineages. Indeed, we have observed that the expansion of viral specific CD8+ T cells in lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infected Irgm1–/– mice is severely impaired (Feng and Barber, unpublished). Moreover, generalized effects of Irgm1 on multiple differentiated leukocyte populations were observed in our previous studies and the rescue of their survival may in part explain the restoration in host resistance observed here in M. avium infected Irgm1–/– mice in which IFN-γ is also absent. Taken together with these previous findings, our work argues that Irgm1 plays a series of diverse interferon dependent functions in the immune response regulating cellular homeostasis as well as controlling the growth of intracellular pathogens. The common mechanism underlying these distinct activities is presently unclear although the data presented here suggest the autophagic process as a likely candidate worthy of further investigation.
Methods
Experimental animals
Wild-type C57BL/6 (CD45.2+) and C57BL/6.SJL (CD45.1+) as well as Ifng–/– and OTII TCR transgenic mice bearing T cells reactive with peptides of OVA were provided by Taconic (Taconic Farms,) from the NIAID Animal Supply Contract. Irgm1–/– mice back-crossed more than 12 times to C57BL/6 mice (kindly provided by Dr. G. Taylor, Duke University) were bred and maintained at the animal care facility at the NIAID. Irgm1–/–OTII and Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– mice were generated by crossing Irgm1–/– mice with TCR transgenic and Ifng–/– animals, respectively. All mice were maintained in specific pathogen free conditions at an AALAC accredited animal facility at the NIAID, NIH (Bethesda, MD) under a study proposal approved by the NIAID Animal Care and Use Committee. Both male and female mice between 8 and 12 wk old were used.
In vivo infections
Mice were injected intravenously (i.v.) or intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 1 or 5×106 colony forming units (CFU) of M. avium (strain SmT 2151) respectively and bacterial loads quantified as previously described26. For T. gondii infection, mice were received 20 cysts of the parasite (ME49 strain) i.p.
Antibodies and flow cytometry
The following antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences: fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated anti-B220 (RA3-6B2), anti-I-A/I-E (2G9), anti-CD49b (DX5), anti-CD44 (IM7) and anti-IFN-γ (XMG1.2); phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-Vα2 TCR (B20.1), anti-IL-2 (JES6-5H4) and anti-CD25 (PC61); Cy-Chrome-conjugated anti-CD4 (RM4-5); allophycocyanin-conjugated anti-CD62L (MEL-14), anti-CD45.2 (104) and anti-CD11c (HL3); Alexa Fluo647-conjugated anti-IL-4 (11B11). Acquisitions were made with a FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star).
Leukocyte counts
Numbers of lymphocytes in lymphoid organs were calculated by multiplying viable cell counts by the percentage of lymphocytes determined by flow cytometry according to their forward and side scatter parameters. CD4+ T cells were identified with specific mAb by flow cytometry. RBC, platelet and differential WBC counts were performed on tail snip samples bled into EDTA-containing tubes using an automated analyzer.
Cell isolation and culture
FACS-sorted splenic naive CD4+ T cells (B220–DX5–I/A–CD62L+CD4+) were used in all in vitro experiments. FACS-sorted splenic DCs (B220–DX5–CD11c+) or irradiated total splenocytes from naive mice (with or without depleting Thy1.2+ cells by magnetic beads) were used as APCs. CD4+ cells (5 × 105/ml) were activated with soluble CD3 mAb (145-2C11, 0.5 μg/ml) or OVA peptide (0.1 μM) in the presence of irradiated splenocytes (2 × 106/ml) or sorted DCs (1.5 × 105/ml) in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.3 and 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol. Viable IL-2 expanded cells were enriched by Histopaque (Sigma) before being used in secondary restimulation or cell death assays. In some experiments, recombinant cytokines IL-4 (10 ng/ml), IL-12 (10 ng/ml) and IL-2 (10 – 50 U/ml) as well as mAb specific for IL-4 (11B11,10 μg /ml), IL-12p40 (C17.8,10 μg /ml) and IFN-γ (XMG 6, 10 μg /ml) were included.
CD4+ T cell transfer
FACS-sorted naive CD4+ T cells from Ifng–/– or Irgm1–/–Ifng–/– mice were activated with CD3 mAb as described above for 3 days then expanded in IL-2 for additional 4 days. 1 × 107 viable cells enriched by Histopaque (Sigma) were injected i.p. into C57BL/6.SJL (CD45.1+) mice that were infected i.p. with T. gondii or M. avium 3 days earlier. Peritoneal exudate cells (PEC) were harvested 4 days after cell transfer and donor cell were determined by flow cytometry following staining with the mAb to CD4, CD45.2, and CD3.
Measurement of cell expansion, division and cytokine production
Cell expansion was measured in triplicate by adding 1uCi/well 3H thymidine (ICN Pharmaceuticals) for the last 8 of 72 h culture. Alternatively, cells were pulsed with 10 μM BrdU (BD Biosciences) during the last 4 of 72 h culture and intracellular expression detected by Flow cytometry using a BrdU detection kit (BD Biosciences). To follow cell division, cells were labeled with CFSE (Molecular Probes) before stimulation. CFSE dilution was determined by flow cytometry at 20, 48 or 72 h. Secreted IL-2 and IFN-γ in 72 h cultures were measured by ELISA.
Cell death assays and gene silencing
For cell death assays, anti-CD3 activated, IL-2-expanded CD4+ lymphocytes were seeded at 2.5 × 105 cells / ml in a 24-well plate and treated with IFN-γ (5 U/ml), anti-CD3 antibodies or FLAG-tagged recombinant human CD95 ligand plus anti-FLAG antibody (Alexis) for 24 to 72 h. Cell viability was determined by flow cytometry with PI staining, in which all samples were adjusted to equal volume and acquired by a FACS Calibur (BD) at a constant time. The specific cell death is calculated based on PI-negative live cell counts: The % of cell loss = (1 – treated live cell counts / untreated live cell counts) × 100. Pharmacological inhibitors Wortmannin and Ly294002 were purchased from Calbiochem (Calbiochem).
For silencing of Beclin1 gene, activated primary CD4+ T lymphocytes were treated with 50 U/ml IL-2 for 2 days and then subjected to siRNA transfection using Amaxa's mouse T cell kit and the necleofector-II machine according to manufacturer's manual (Amaxa). The Stealth siRNA was obtained from Invitrogen (Invitrogen) with following sense and antisense sequences. Mouse Beclin1: 5′-AGCGGACAGUUUGGCACAAUCAAUA and 5′-UAUUGAUUGUGCCAAACUGUCCGCU; Non-specific (NS) sRNA: 5′-AGCGACAGUUUCACGCUAAAGGAUA and 5′-UAUCCUUUAGCGUGAAACUGUCGCU. The transfected lymphocytes were cultured with supplemented mouse T cell necleofector medium in the presence of 50 U/ml IL-2 for 2∼4 days before further experiments.
Immunoblotting analysis of Irgm1 expression in primary CD4+ T cells
Lymphocytes were lysed with ice-cold TNT lysis buffer (30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 1% Triton X-100, and 1 × complete protease inhibitor cocktail, Roche) and Irgm1 protein expression was detected with a rabbit polyclonal anti-sera as previously described26.
Electron Microscopy
FACS-sorted naive CD4+ T cells were activated and expanded in IL-2 as indicated above. Viable cells enriched by Histapaque (Sigma) were exposed to medium or IFN-γ (5 U/ml) for 30 h. Cells fixation and processing for the EM analysis were performed as described previously49.
Statistics
Mann-Whitney test was used to determine the significance of differences between groups. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank S. White, C. Henry and C. Eigsti for their excellent technical assistance and J. Zhu and L. Yu for their thoughtful advice and discussion. In addition, we are grateful to K. Nagashima of the Electron Microscope Facility, Image Analysis Laboratory, SAIC-Frederick, Inc. National Cancer Institute at Frederick for performing the EM studies and A. Cheever of the Biomedical Research Institute, Rockville, MD for assessing tissue fibrosis and pathology in S. mansoni infection experiments presented here. Finally, we thank R. Donnelly (CBER/FDA) for his initial help in measuring STAT1 phosphorylation and H. Young and D. Barber for critical reading of this manuscript. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of NIAID, NIH, DHHS.
Footnotes
The authors have no conflicting financial interests.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS: C.G.F., designed the study, did research, analyzed results and wrote the manuscript; A.S. directed the study and wrote the manuscript; L.Z. and M.J.L. designed experiments, did research, analyzed results and contributed to the preparation of the manuscript; D.J., A.B., J.L.C., W.T.W., D.C. and P.L.S. did research and analyzed results; and S.H., and P.C., did research.
References
- 1.Gett AV, Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A, Geginat J. T cell fitness determined by signal strength. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:355–60. doi: 10.1038/ni908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khoruts A, Mondino A, Pape KA, Reiner SL, Jenkins MK. A natural immunological adjuvant enhances T cell clonal expansion through a CD28-dependent, interleukin (IL)-2-independent mechanism. J Exp Med. 1998;187:225–36. doi: 10.1084/jem.187.2.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Croft M. Co-stimulatory members of the TNFR family: keys to effective T-cell immunity? Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:609–20. doi: 10.1038/nri1148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Krammer PH, Arnold R, Lavrik IN. Life and death in peripheral T cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:532–42. doi: 10.1038/nri2115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Green DR. Fas Bim boom! Immunity. 2008;28:141–3. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shimizu S, et al. Role of Bcl-2 family proteins in a non-apoptotic programmed cell death dependent on autophagy genes. Nat Cell Biol. 2004;6:1221–8. doi: 10.1038/ncb1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yu L, et al. Regulation of an ATG7-beclin 1 program of autophagic cell death by caspase-8. Science. 2004;304:1500–2. doi: 10.1126/science.1096645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Levine B, Yuan J. Autophagy in cell death: an innocent convict? J Clin Invest. 2005;115:2679–88. doi: 10.1172/JCI26390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Maiuri MC, Zalckvar E, Kimchi A, Kroemer G. Self-eating and self-killing: crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:741–52. doi: 10.1038/nrm2239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Espert L, et al. Autophagy is involved in T cell death after binding of HIV-1 envelope proteins to CXCR4. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:2161–72. doi: 10.1172/JCI26185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pua HH, Dzhagalov I, Chuck M, Mizushima N, He YW. A critical role for the autophagy gene Atg5 in T cell survival and proliferation. J Exp Med. 2007;204:25–31. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vella AT, McCormack JE, Linsley PS, Kappler JW, Marrack P. Lipopolysaccharide interferes with the induction of peripheral T cell death. Immunity. 1995;2:261–70. doi: 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90050-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu CY, et al. Distinct lineages of TH1 cells have differential capacities for memory cell generation in vivo. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:852–8. doi: 10.1038/ni832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Whitmire JK, Benning N, Whitton JL. Cutting edge: early IFN-γ signaling directly enhances primary antiviral CD4+ T cell responses. J Immunol. 2005;175:5624–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.9.5624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu Y, Janeway CA., Jr Interferon γ plays a critical role in induced cell death of effector T cell: a possible third mechanism of self-tolerance. J Exp Med. 1990;172:1735–9. doi: 10.1084/jem.172.6.1735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Refaeli Y, Van Parijs L, Alexander SI, Abbas AK. Interferon γ is required for activation-induced death of T lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 2002;196:999–1005. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chu CQ, Wittmer S, Dalton DK. Failure to suppress the expansion of the activated CD4 T cell population in interferon γ-deficient mice leads to exacerbation of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Exp Med. 2000;192:123–8. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.1.123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dalton DK, Haynes L, Chu CQ, Swain SL, Wittmer S. Interferon γ eliminates responding CD4 T cells during mycobacterial infection by inducing apoptosis of activated CD4 T cells. J Exp Med. 2000;192:117–22. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.1.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bach EA, et al. Ligand-induced autoregulation of IFN-γ receptor beta chain expression in T helper cell subsets. Science. 1995;270:1215–8. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5239.1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Pernis A, et al. Lack of interferon γ receptor beta chain and the prevention of interferon γ signaling in TH1 cells. Science. 1995;269:245–7. doi: 10.1126/science.7618088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sorace JM, Johnson RJ, Howard DL, Drysdale BE. Identification of an endotoxin and IFN-inducible cDNA: possible identification of a novel protein family. J Leukoc Biol. 1995;58:477–84. doi: 10.1002/jlb.58.4.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boehm U, et al. Two families of GTPases dominate the complex cellular response to IFN-γ. J Immunol. 1998;161:6715–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Taylor GA, Feng CG, Sher A. p47 GTPases: regulators of immunity to intracellular pathogens. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:100–9. doi: 10.1038/nri1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.MacMicking JD, Taylor GA, McKinney JD. Immune control of tuberculosis by IFN-γ-inducible LRG-47. Science. 2003;302:654–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1088063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Singh SB, Davis AS, Taylor GA, Deretic V. Human IRGM induces autophagy to eliminate intracellular mycobacteria. Science. 2006;313:1438–41. doi: 10.1126/science.1129577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Feng CG, et al. Mice deficient in LRG-47 display increased susceptibility to mycobacterial infection associated with the induction of lymphopenia. J Immunol. 2004;172:1163–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.2.1163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Santiago HC, et al. Mice deficient in LRG-47 display enhanced susceptibility to Trypanosoma cruzi infection associated with defective hemopoiesis and intracellular control of parasite growth. J Immunol. 2005;175:8165–72. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.12.8165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Feng CG, Weksberg DC, Taylor GA, Sher A, Goodell MA. The p47 GTPase Lrg-47 (Irgm1) Links Host Defense and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Proliferation. Cell stem cell. 2008;2:83–89. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Winslow GM, Roberts AD, Blackman MA, Woodland DL. Persistence and turnover of antigen-specific CD4 T cells during chronic tuberculosis infection in the mouse. J Immunol. 2003;170:2046–52. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.4.2046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Doherty TM, Sher A. Defects in cell-mediated immunity affect chronic, but not innate, resistance of mice to Mycobacterium avium infection. J Immunol. 1997;158:4822–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Florido M, et al. Gamma interferon-induced T-cell loss in virulent Mycobacterium avium infection. Infect Immun. 2005;73:3577–86. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.6.3577-3586.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pearce EJ, MacDonald AS. The immunobiology of schistosomiasis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:499–511. doi: 10.1038/nri843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Liang XH, et al. Induction of autophagy and inhibition of tumorigenesis by beclin 1. Nature. 1999;402:672–6. doi: 10.1038/45257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xu Y, Kim SO, Li Y, Han J. Autophagy contributes to caspase-independent macrophage cell death. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:19179–87. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M513377200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Foulds KE, et al. IFN-γ mediates the death of Th1 cells in a paracrine manner. J Immunol. 2008;180:842–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.2.842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Li X, McKinstry KK, Swain SL, Dalton DK. IFN-γ acts directly on activated CD4+ T cells during mycobacterial infection to promote apoptosis by inducing components of the intracellular apoptosis machinery and by inducing extracellular proapoptotic signals. J Immunol. 2007;179:939–49. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.2.939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bronte V, Serafini P, Mazzoni A, Segal DM, Zanovello P. L-arginine metabolism in myeloid cells controls T-lymphocyte functions. Trends Immunol. 2003;24:302–6. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4906(03)00132-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mellor AL, Munn DH. Creating immune privilege: active local suppression that benefits friends, but protects foes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:74–80. doi: 10.1038/nri2233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Van De Wiele CJ, et al. Loss of interferon-induced Stat1 phosphorylation in activated T cells. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2004;24:169–78. doi: 10.1089/jir.2004.24.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Alexander WS, et al. SOCS1 is a critical inhibitor of interferon gamma signaling and prevents the potentially fatal neonatal actions of this cytokine. Cell. 1999;98:597–608. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80047-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Egwuagu CE, et al. Suppressors of cytokine signaling proteins are differentially expressed in Th1 and Th2 cells: implications for Th cell lineage commitment and maintenance. J Immunol. 2002;168:3181–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.7.3181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chong MM, Metcalf D, Jamieson E, Alexander WS, Kay TW. Suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 in T cells and macrophages is critical for preventing lethal inflammation. Blood. 2005;106:1668–75. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-08-3049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Brysha M, et al. Suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 attenuates the duration of interferon γ signal transduction in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:22086–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102737200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Platanias LC. Mechanisms of type-I- and type-II-interferon-mediated signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:375–86. doi: 10.1038/nri1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.van Boxel-Dezaire AH, Stark GR. Cell type-specific signaling in response to interferon-γ. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2007;316:119–54. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-71329-6_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Levine B, Deretic V. Unveiling the roles of autophagy in innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:767–77. doi: 10.1038/nri2161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature. 2008;451:1069–75. doi: 10.1038/nature06639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gutierrez MG, et al. Autophagy is a defense mechanism inhibiting BCG and Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival in infected macrophages. Cell. 2004;119:753–66. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gonda MA, Aaronson SA, Ellmore N, Zeve VH, Nagashima K. Ultrastructural studies of surface features of human normal and tumor cells in tissue culture by scanning and transmission electron microscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1976;56:245–63. doi: 10.1093/jnci/56.2.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



