Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1991 Sep;59(9):3199–3204. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.9.3199-3204.1991

Induction of protective immunity by using Anaplasma marginale initial body membranes.

N Tebele 1, T C McGuire 1, G H Palmer 1
PMCID: PMC258153  PMID: 1715323

Abstract

Anaplasma marginale initial bodies of the Norton Zimbabwe strain were disrupted and separated into two membrane fractions banding at 1.15 and 1.22 g/cm3 by sucrose density centrifugation. The membrane fractions differed in their morphology and polypeptide composition. Membranes banding at 1.22 g/cm3 shared epitopes with surface-exposed polypeptides of the Florida strain of A. marginale, confirming the outer membrane location of these polypeptides. Immunization of cattle with either membrane fraction induced protection against homologous challenge, as demonstrated by significantly less anemia and lower peak rickettsemia values compared with those of adjuvant-immunized and nonimmunized calves. Protection correlated with antibody titer to membrane polypeptides. Although both membrane fractions induced protection, a 31-kDa polypeptide was the only common antigen to both fractions, as shown by reactivity of immune sera. Identification of membrane antigens capable of inducing protective immunity should facilitate development of vaccines against anaplasmosis suitable for use in Zimbabwe.

Full text

PDF
3199

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barbet A. F., Davis W. C., McGuire T. C. Cross-neutralization of two different trypanosome populations derived from a single organism. Nature. 1982 Dec 2;300(5891):453–456. doi: 10.1038/300453a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Eriks I. S., Palmer G. H., McGuire T. C., Allred D. R., Barbet A. F. Detection and quantitation of Anaplasma marginale in carrier cattle by using a nucleic acid probe. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Feb;27(2):279–284. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.2.279-284.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hindahl M. S., Iglewski B. H. Isolation and characterization of the Legionella pneumophila outer membrane. J Bacteriol. 1984 Jul;159(1):107–113. doi: 10.1128/jb.159.1.107-113.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hindahl M. S., Iglewski B. H. Outer membrane proteins from Legionella pneumophila serogroups and other Legionella species. Infect Immun. 1986 Jan;51(1):94–101. doi: 10.1128/iai.51.1.94-101.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kieser S. T., Eriks I. S., Palmer G. H. Cyclic rickettsemia during persistent Anaplasma marginale infection of cattle. Infect Immun. 1990 Apr;58(4):1117–1119. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.4.1117-1119.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lawrence J. A., Foggin C. M., Norval R. A. The effects of war on the control of diseases of livestock in Rhodesia (Zimbabwe). Vet Rec. 1980 Jul 26;107(4):82–85. doi: 10.1136/vr.107.4.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Love J. N. Cryogenic preservation of Anaplasma marginale with Dimethyl sulfoxide. Am J Vet Res. 1972 Dec;33(12):2557–2560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McGuire T. C., Davis W. C., Brassfield A. L., McElwain T. F., Palmer G. H. Identification of Anaplasma marginale long-term carrier cattle by detection of serum antibody to isolated MSP-3. J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Apr;29(4):788–793. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.4.788-793.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McGuire T. C., Palmer G. H., Goff W. L., Johnson M. I., Davis W. C. Common and isolate-restricted antigens of Anaplasma marginale detected with monoclonal antibodies. Infect Immun. 1984 Sep;45(3):697–700. doi: 10.1128/iai.45.3.697-700.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Norval R. A., Fivaz B. H., Lawrence J. A., Brown A. F. Epidemiology of tick-borne diseases of cattle in Zimbabwe. II. Anaplasmosis. Trop Anim Health Prod. 1984 May;16(2):63–70. doi: 10.1007/BF02239846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Norval R. A. Tick infestations and tick-borne diseases in Zimbabwe Rhodesia. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1979 Dec;50(4):289–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Palmer G. H., Barbet A. F., Cantor G. H., McGuire T. C. Immunization of cattle with the MSP-1 surface protein complex induces protection against a structurally variant Anaplasma marginale isolate. Infect Immun. 1989 Nov;57(11):3666–3669. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.11.3666-3669.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Palmer G. H., Barbet A. F., Musoke A. J., Katende J. M., Rurangirwa F., Shkap V., Pipano E., Davis W. C., McGuire T. C. Recognition of conserved surface protein epitopes on Anaplasma centrale and Anaplasma marginale isolates from Israel, Kenya and the United States. Int J Parasitol. 1988 Feb;18(1):33–38. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(88)90033-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Palmer G. H., McGuire T. C. Immune serum against Anaplasma marginale initial bodies neutralizes infectivity for cattle. J Immunol. 1984 Aug;133(2):1010–1015. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Palmer G. H., Waghela S. D., Barbet A. F., Davis W. C., McGuire T. C. Characterization of a neutralization-sensitive epitope on the Am 105 surface protein of Anaplasma marginale. Int J Parasitol. 1987 Oct;17(7):1279–1285. doi: 10.1016/0020-7519(87)90093-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ristic M., Carson C. A. Methods of immunoprophylaxis against bovine anaplasmosis with emphasis on use of the attenuated Anaplasma marginale vaccine. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1977;93:151–188. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-8855-9_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Scott M. T., Bahr G., Moddaber F., Afchain D., Chedid L. Adjuvant requirements for protective immunization of mice using a Trypanosoma cruzi 90K cell surface glycoprotein. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1984;74(4):373–377. doi: 10.1159/000233576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith D. K., Winkler H. H. Separation of inner and outer membranes of Rickettsia prowazeki and characterization of their polypeptide compositions. J Bacteriol. 1979 Feb;137(2):963–971. doi: 10.1128/jb.137.2.963-971.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith P. K., Krohn R. I., Hermanson G. T., Mallia A. K., Gartner F. H., Provenzano M. D., Fujimoto E. K., Goeke N. M., Olson B. J., Klenk D. C. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal Biochem. 1985 Oct;150(1):76–85. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(85)90442-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Towbin H., Gordon J. Immunoblotting and dot immunobinding--current status and outlook. J Immunol Methods. 1984 Sep 4;72(2):313–340. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(84)90001-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wells P. W., Emery D. L., Hinson C. A., Morrison W. I., Murray M. Immunization of cattle with a variant-specific surface antigen of Trypanosoma brucei: influence of different adjuvants. Infect Immun. 1982 Apr;36(1):1–10. doi: 10.1128/iai.36.1.1-10.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zaugg J. L., Stiller D., Coan M. E., Lincoln S. D. Transmission of Anaplasma marginale Theiler by males of Dermacentor andersoni Stiles fed on an Idaho field-infected, chronic carrier cow. Am J Vet Res. 1986 Oct;47(10):2269–2271. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES