Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov;180(3):1379–1389. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.089623

TABLE 1.

A representative sample of simulation results

Outgroup Probe sets t1 t2 log2(t1/t2) a σ p
No No 1.91 (1.72–2.08) 0.36 (0.27–0.52) 2.45 (1.83–2.75) 0.50 (0.48–0.54) 0.18 (0.12–0.18) 0.00 (0.00–0.01)
Yes No 2.02 (1.86–2.16) 0.49 (0.43–0.56) 2.00 (1.83–2.24) 0.50 (0.47–0.53) 0.12 (0.10–0.14) 0.01 (0.01–0.01)
No Yes 2.01 (1.39–2.40) 0.50 (0.37–0.64) 2.00 (1.49–2.51) 0.43 (0.33–0.49) 0.30 (0.22–0.35) 0.00 (0.00–0.00)
True parameters 2.00 0.50 2.00 0.50 0.10 0.01

Shown are medians and 25 and 75% quartiles for estimates of branch lengths t1, t2, and log2(t1/t2) and shape parameters a, σ, and outlier proportion p over 20 simulated data sets with parameters close to values inferred from actual data (see Table 2). Inferences were made from data without (two-species tree) or with a single outgroup (three-species tree) and using either 1000 probes or 1000 probe sets, each consisting of a geometrically distributed number (mean 6) of identical probes. Full simulation results are presented in supplemental Tables 1–3.