Abstract
The persistent nature of addiction has been associated with activity-induced plasticity of neurons within the striatum and nucleus accumbens (NAc). To identify the molecular processes leading to these adaptations, we performed Cre/loxP-mediated genetic ablations of two key regulators of gene expression in response to activity, the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV (CaMKIV) and its postulated main target, the cAMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB). We found that acute cocaine-induced gene expression in the striatum was largely unaffected by the loss of CaMKIV. On the behavioral level, mice lacking CaMKIV in dopaminoceptive neurons displayed increased sensitivity to cocaine as evidenced by augmented expression of locomotor sensitization and enhanced conditioned place preference and reinstatement after extinction. However, the loss of CREB in the forebrain had no effect on either of these behaviors, even though it robustly blunted acute cocaine-induced transcription. To test the relevance of these observations for addiction in humans, we performed an association study of CAMK4 and CREB promoter polymorphisms with cocaine addiction in a large sample of addicts. We found that a single nucleotide polymorphism in the CAMK4 promoter was significantly associated with cocaine addiction, whereas variations in the CREB promoter regions did not correlate with drug abuse. These findings reveal a critical role for CaMKIV in the development and persistence of cocaine-induced behaviors, through mechanisms dissociated from acute effects on gene expression and CREB-dependent transcription.
Keywords: addiction, CaMKIV, CREB, striatum
Accumulating evidence indicates that long term-neuronal plasticity is dependent on specific patterns of gene expression evoked in response to stimuli. A pivotal role in this process has been ascribed to the immediate-early genes (IEGs) (1). Therefore, establishing the pathways regulating these patterns could allow linking gene activities with specific outcomes in behavior. The cAMP-responsive element binding protein (CREB) and the related cAMP response element modulator (CREM) have been shown to be the main transcription factors regulating IEG expression (2, 3). They are activated through multiple signal pathways, including by Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase IV (CaMKIV) and also cAMP-dependent signaling and the MAPK pathway, although other signaling cascades have also been implicated (2, 4). The role of CaMKIV appears to be of particular interest, because it is not ubiquitously expressed, with highest levels in neurons (5–7). CaMKIV has a predominantly nuclear localization and has been suggested to be the main CREB activator in hippocampal neurons in response to electrical stimulation (4). Indeed, ablation or inactivation of the Camk4 gene has been shown to decrease CREB phosphorylation, reduce Fos induction in the hippocampus, and impair formation of long-term potentiation (8–10), although the exact mechanism is still a matter of dispute (11). Although the main role of CaMKIV might be activation of CREB, it is also reported to phosphorylate the CREB-binding protein (12, 13) and to regulate histone deacetylase (HDAC) trafficking (14, 15). Finally, CaMKIV regulates splicing for pre-mRNAs from several target genes such as the BK channel and NMDA receptor subunit NR1 (16) through CaMKIV-responsive RNA elements (CaRREs).
CREB and IEGs have been implicated in cocaine-induced plasticity (17–19). Expression of a dominant-negative variant of CREB in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) enhanced cocaine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) (20), which is used to measure drug reinforcement (21). This suggests that CREB activation may reduce the sensitivity to cocaine. In line with this notion, mice with deletion of the major CREB isoforms show enhanced cocaine-induced CPP when compared with control mice (22). Moreover, transgenic mice overexpressing CREB exhibit reduced CPP responses following cocaine treatment (23). Together, these studies imply a role of CREB in cocaine reinforcement; however, the conclusions remain limited because the applied genetic interventions either fail to block CREB activity completely or induce compensation of CREM.
Given the proposed role of CaMKIV in CREB activation, we hypothesized that CaMKIV might be a crucial molecular component in the development of cocaine addiction. To test this hypothesis, we used transgenic mice with targeted gene deletions in dopaminoceptive neurons to elucidate the contribution of CaMKIV, CREB, and CREM to cocaine-induced regulation of gene expression and its behavioral significance.
Results
Generation of Mice with Targeted Ablations of the Camk4 or Creb1 Gene.
Inactivation of the Camk4 gene was achieved using the Cre/loxP system (24). The third exon, containing the ATP binding site, was flanked with loxP sites, and its deletion produces a shift in the reading frame that prevents further translation. The Cre recombinase was expressed under the control of the D1 dopamine receptor gene (Drd1a) promoter from a YAC construct (25, 26). This resulted in ablation of the Camk4 gene in the striatum, NAc, and other D1-expressing cells in the cortex and other brain areas (26). Loss of CaMKIV is observed in the great majority of striatal neurons [Fig. 1 A and B, supporting information (SI) Fig. S1], indicating that expression of the transgene is not limited to neurons of the direct pathway, which constitute roughly half of the medium spiny neurons. We suggest that this could result from transient periods of Cre expression during development as previously shown (26).
Fig. 1.
Targeted inactivation of Camk4 and Creb1 genes. Immunostaining for CaMKIV (A and B) or CREB (C and D) was performed following the protocol described in Methods. Striatum from control animal (A), Camk4D1Cre mouse (B), Creb1loxP/loxP, Crem−/− mouse (C), and Creb1Camkcre4, Crem+/− mouse (D).
We have also used the previously described Creb1Camkcre4 mice with additional Crem−/− or Crem+/− mutation (25). In these lines, the Creb1 gene is inactivated in the forebrain neurons, including the striatum (Fig. 1 C and D, Fig. S1). We have previously shown that the loss of CREB is readily compensated for by overexpression of CREM (27, 28). Loss of both CREB and CREM is associated with progressive neurodegeneration of the striatum and hippocampus but is prevented by the presence of a single Crem allele in the Creb1Camkcre4, Crem+/− animals (25).
Loss of CaMKIV Has Minor Effects on Induction of IEGs by a Single Injection of Cocaine.
As anticipated, the abundance of activated CREB, phosphorylated on Ser 133, was reduced in Camk4D1Cre animals (Fig. S2). To assess the impact of the observed changes in phosphorylation on gene expression, we performed array gene expression profiling on the striatum (including the NAc) from Camk4D1Cre animals and littermate controls. As illustrated on the heat map in Fig. 2A, cocaine increased the transcription of several IEGs both in control and Camk4D1Cre animals. There were 36 transcripts induced by cocaine more than 1.5-fold with P < 0.001 (t test) as compared with saline-injected controls (Table S1). Most induced were Fos and Egr2, with a 20–30-fold increase compared with saline-injected controls, followed by Arc, Fosb, Junb (Table S1), and other previously reported IEGs (17–19, 29) (Fig. 2A, Table S1). Thus, from the 36 transcripts identified as cocaine induced in controls, none had a significantly different induction between control and Camk4D1Cre animals (Table S1). In line with these observations, no major differences between the genotypes were seen when we performed unbiased ontological analysis of the gene expression data, even though it hints at possible mild adaptations in transcription after CaMKIV loss (Table S2). In contrast to Camk4D1Cre mice, only 1 IEG transcript (Nr4a1) was significantly induced by cocaine in the striatum and NAc of Creb1Camkcre4, Crem−/− mice and 12 in Creb1Camkcre4, Crem+/− animals (Table S1) (30). The case of Fos makes a good example because its sharp increase in transcription after cocaine treatment (∼30-fold compared with saline) is not affected by CaMKIV loss but is completely lost after ablation of Creb1 and Crem (<2-fold), and only partially rescued by presence of a Crem allele (∼8-fold). Thus, the ability of a single allele of Crem to compensate for Creb1 is remarkable and substantiates the importance of the CREB family of transcription factors in control of activity-regulated transcription. Additionally, we performed immunostaining of Fos in Camk4D1Cre and control animals after cocaine injection to examine if the loss of CaMKIV produced a change in the regional pattern of IEG expression (Fig. 2B, Fig. S3). There was a robust increase in Fos protein levels in the striatum and NAc (Fig. 2B), discrete areas of the cortex, and the amygdala in both mutant and control animals treated with cocaine. No appreciable changes in the regional pattern of Fos abundance in the cortex, hippocampus, or midbrain were found (Fig. S3).
Fig. 2.
Loss of CaMKIV does not impair induction of IEGs. (A) Profiling of gene transcription in the striatum 1 h after cocaine treatment. Gene expression profiling was performed using Affymetrix 420A 2.0 arrays on RNA samples derived from striatum from the Camk4D1Cre animals and littermate controls 1 h after i.p. injection with 25 mg/kg cocaine or saline. On the heat map shown in the figure, each column represents the average (3 for saline treated groups, 6 for cocaine treated groups) log2 expression values corresponding to significantly induced transcripts as indicated on the right. The color intensity is proportional to the normalized expression value as shown in the legend below. Transcripts are ordered by fold of induction in the controls treated with cocaine vs. saline. (B) Induction of Fos protein in the striatum 2 h after cocaine injection. Coronal sections from cocaine-injected Camk4D1Cre and control mice were immunostained for Fos. The upper four panels correspond to representative fragments of the dorsal striatum, and the lower four panels show a fragment of the NAc on the border of the shell and core divisions. The corresponding genotypes and treatments are indicate above and left of the images. (C) Expression of Fos, Fosb, and Pdyn after a saline or cocaine (10 mg/kg) challenge 7 days after a drug-free period in cocaine-sensitized mice. The bars represent transcript abundance normalized to the levels observed in saline-treated control animals with the SEM shown (n = 4–7). Empty bars correspond to control animals, and black bars correspond to Camk4D1Cre mice treated as indicated below the graphs. A significant difference (P < 0.05) between cocaine-treated Camk4D1Cre vs. controls is indicated by an asterisk.
CaMKIV also regulates splicing for pre-mRNAs from several target genes, such as the BK channel and NMDA receptor subunit NR1 (16), through CaRRE sites. Therefore, we assessed whether the splicing of the NR1 subunit (Grin1) or the BK potassium channel (Kcnma1) was affected by the loss of CaMKIV. No differences in the ratio of the “long” variants to total abundance of the transcripts in the striatum and NAc could be detected (Fig. S4). In our further screen, we found a putative CaRRE motif (Fig. S5) within the mouse Fosb gene around the 5′ border of exon V that may regulate splicing in a CaMKIV-dependent manner (16). However, no appreciable differences in the ratio of large to small isoforms could be detected in Camk4D1Cre animals (Fig. S5). Altogether, these results indicate that CaMKIV has minor effects on the induction of IEGs after acute cocaine treatment.
Therefore, we considered the possibility that CaMKIV is more important in the regulation of gene expression after repeated cocaine treatment. We analyzed gene expression in Camk4D1Cre and control mice after they had been subjected to our behavioral sensitization protocol (five chronic injections of cocaine) and then challenged with cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline after a drug-free period. No differences between genotypes in induction of Fos were observed (Fig. 2C) [two-way ANOVA: genotype F (1, 16) = 1.45; not significant]. However, Camk4D1Cre mice displayed increased levels of Fosb transcript following a challenge injection of cocaine [two-way ANOVA: genotype F (1, 16) = 8.48; P = 0.01] and a trend toward change of Pdyn mRNA [two-way ANOVA: genotype F (1, 16) = 2.25; not significant] (Fig. 2C). Therefore, although the loss of CaMKIV does not seem to affect expression of IEGs, it may cause long-term adaptations in abundance of transcripts previously reported to represent hallmarks of addictive behavior (23, 29, 31). Because the activity of the Fosb promoter after chronic cocaine administration has been shown to be regulated by histone acetylation and CaMKIV is involved in HDAC trafficking, we also investigated if cocaine affected phosphorylation of HDAC4 and HDAC5 differently in the striatum of Camk4D1Cre mice and controls. Although Ser-498 phosphorylation of HDAC5 was not affected, interestingly, HDAC4 was phosphorylated on Ser-632 in Camk4D1Cre mice but not in controls in response to cocaine (Fig. S2).
Loss of CaMKIV in Dopaminoceptive Neurons Leads to Enhanced Psychomotor and Reinforcing Effects of Cocaine.
In a series of experiments, we studied the behavioral effects of cocaine in Camk4D1Cre mice. In baseline activity and following saline injection, these mutants did not differ from control littermates (Fig. S6). However, Camk4D1Cre transgenic mice showed an increased initial response to cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) during the first 10 min after administration (Fig. 3A), whereas no differences were found in mice with targeted Creb1 ablation (Fig. 3 B and C). These results indicate the existence of an altered psychomotor responsiveness to cocaine in Camk4D1Cre mice and suggest that CaMKIV is modulating a cocaine-induced immediate response through CREB-independent mechanisms.
Fig. 3.
Locomotor effects of cocaine in Camk4D1Cre and Creb1Camkcre4 mice. Initial locomotor response (A–C) and development of cocaine sensitization (d–f) (10 mg/kg, i.p.) in Camk4D1Cre (n = 9); Creb1Camkcre4, Crem+/− (n = 6); Creb1Camkcre4, Crem−/− (n = 4); and control mice for each genotype (n = 8, n = 7, and n = 8, respectively). (a–c) Cocaine induced a higher increase in locomotor activity during the first 10 min in Camk4D1Cre mutant mice (t (15) = −3.33, P = 0.004) but in none of the Creb1Camkcre4 genotypes or control groups (Creb1Camkcre4, Crem+/−: t (11) = −0.4, P = 0.6; Creb1Camkcre4, Crem−/−: t (10) = −1.12, P = 0.3). (D–F) Control and both Creb1Camkcre4 genotypes showed intact development and expression of cocaine sensitization (Creb1Camkcre4, Crem+/− [two-way ANOVA cocaine effect: F (3, 30) = 21.33, P < 0.001; Creb1Camkcre4, Crem−/− F (2, 18) = 13.76, P < 0.001]. Development of sensitization was absent in Camk4D1Cre mutant mice, but they expressed a significantly higher response to cocaine after drug-free intervals than their control littermates [two-way ANOVA day × genotype effect for Camk4D1Cre: F (3, 45) = 10.52, P < 0.001; Newman-Keuls posthoc test: CamKIVD1Cre vs. control, *P < 0.01 for coc-12 and coc-19]. Data represent the mean increase in percentage in activity in respect to saline over a 10-min (A–C) or 30 min (D–F) recording period after injection of cocaine. # represents P < 0.05 compared with day 1 and *P < 0.01 compared with control group. Because of the progressive neurodegeneration (25), Creb1Camkcre4, Crem−/− mice were not tested on day 19.
Mice were further injected daily with cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) for an additional 4 days, and we found a significant increase in the locomotor response to cocaine between the first and fifth sessions in all control groups of mice as well as in the Creb1 transgenic animals, indicating development of sensitization (Fig. 3 D–F). In contrast, there was no significant difference between locomotor activity after the first and fifth cocaine injections in Camk4D1Cre mice (Fig. 3D; P = 0.76) probably because of their augmented initial sensitivity to cocaine.
Following a cocaine challenge on day 12 (10 mg/kg) and day 19 (5 mg/kg), all control and Creb1 mutant mice exhibited a robust sensitized response to cocaine, confirming the persistence of sensitization (posthoc test, for all P < 0.05). Camk4D1Cre mice even had an augmented response when compared with their controls on both challenge days (Fig. 3D) (posthoc analysis in control vs. Camk4D1Cre on days 12 and 19, both P < 0.01). In summary, despite the fact that Camk4D1Cre mutants initially show a slower onset in the development of behavioral sensitization, they finally show an augmented sensitized behavioral response to cocaine when compared with control littermates.
We further studied the reinforcing properties of cocaine by using the CPP paradigm and found that the Camk4D1Cremice displayed an augmented CPP response (10 mg/kg, i.p.) (Fig. 4A). Conversely, ablation of Creb1 had no effect on cocaine-induced CPP, and transgenic animals reached similar levels of preference as controls (Fig. 4 B and C). The Camk4D1Cre animals also displayed behavioral alterations in a model of cocaine seeking. We modeled cocaine-seeking behavior as the reinduction of CPP by re-exposure to the drug after an extinction period (32, 33). In this procedure, we lowered the dose of cocaine used for the conditioning to 5 mg/kg. Consistently with the higher dose, Camk4D1Cre but not Creb1Camkcre4, Crem+/− mice showed stronger CPP when compared with controls (P < 0.01). Extinction of CPP was performed by pairing saline injections with the compartment previously associated with cocaine. After eight extinction sessions, mice of all genotypes displayed no preference between the compartments anymore (Fig. 4 D and E). One day later, a challenge injection of cocaine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) induced a similar reinstatement of CPP in all genotypes, except for the Camk4D1Cre animals, which again displayed a stronger preference than controls (P < 0.05).
Fig. 4.
Cocaine-induced reinforcement and drug-seeking behavior in Camk4D1Cre and Creb1Camkcre4 mice. Cocaine-induced CPP (A–C), extinction and reinstatement (D and E) in Camk4D1Cre (n = 8); Creb1Camkcre4, Crem+/− (n = 8); Creb1Camkcre4, Crem−/− (n = 4); and control mice for each genotype (n = 10, n = 13, and n = 13, respectively). (A–C) Camk4D1Cre mutant mice showed higher preference for the cocaine-paired compartment [t (16) = −3.96. P = 0.001], whereas both Creb1Camkcre4 genotypes and control mice showed similar scores [Creb1Camkcre4, Crem+/−: t (19) = −0.23, P = 0.6; Creb1Camkcre4, Crem−/−: t (15) = −0.3, P = 0.7]. (D and F) Camk4D1Cre mutant mice showed a more robust CPP at a dose of 5 mg/kg when compared with the control group (n = 5 per genotype). After extinction, a challenge injection of cocaine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) induced a similar reinstatement of the CPP in Creb1Camkcre4, Crem+/− and control mice (n = 8 and n = 13, respectively) [two-way ANOVA conditioning × genotype effect: F (2, 18) = 0.3, P = 0.7], except for the Camk4D1Cre animals, which displayed stronger preference than controls [two-way ANOVA conditioning × genotype effect: Camk4D1Cre: F (2, 30) = 2.91, P < 0.05; post hoc for CPP, P < 0.05]. Results are presented as the means + SEM. CPP scores shown correspond to induction, followed by extinction and reinstatement of CPP. Statistical significance of P < 0.05 compared with control group is indicated by an asterisk.
As additional controls, we tested heterozygous mice, which express the Cre recombinase but have one WT allele of the Camk4, as well as mice that had recombinant adenoassociated virus expressing a dominant-negative variant of the CaMKIV injected into the NAc. The heterozygous mice exhibited a significantly higher preference for the cocaine-paired compartment than controls (Fig. 5A) but still lower than Camk4D1Cre animals. This indicates that even partial loss of CaMKIV was sufficient to produce enhanced responses to cocaine and further shows a gene dosage effect. In addition, a rAAV vector expressing Flag-tagged dominant-negative CaMKIV was injected bilaterally into the NAc of adult mice. Three weeks after surgery, the transduction efficiency was assessed by Flag-immunohistochemistry and robust transgene expression was found in NAc neurons in all rAAV-dnCaMKIV–treated animals (Fig. S7) (34). Similar to our results in Camk4D1Cre mice, cocaine-induced CPP scores in rAAV-dnCaMKIV–treated mice were significantly higher as compared with the “empty” virus-treated group (Fig. 5B), thus confirming the role of the NAc in the observed phenotype and excluding developmental adaptations as a confounding factor in the Camk4D1Cre mice. Furthermore, we tested the response of dnCaMKIV-expressing animals on cocaine-induced behavioral sensitization (data not shown). Two-way ANOVA indicated a treatment × genotype effect [F (3, 67) = 5.7; P = 0.002]. These animals showed enhanced locomotor response to an acute cocaine challenge (empty virus-treated mice: 8359 ± 579 vs. rAAV-dnCaMKIV–treated mice: 10912 ± 972, posthoc P < 0.05) and also augmented sensitization (empty virus-treated mice: 15294 ± 907 vs. rAAV-dnCaMKIV–treated mice: 17554 ± 1079, posthoc P < 0.05).
Fig. 5.
Cocaine-induced reinforcement in heterozygous and virus-treated mice. Cocaine-induced CPP (10 mg/kg) in Camk4D1Cre heterozygous (n = 6) and recombinant adenoassociated virus (rAAV)–dnCaMKIV (n = 9) mice and their respective control littermates (controls [n = 10] or empty virus-treated mice [n = 8]). Both heterozygous mice for Camk4 (A) and rAAV-dnCaMKIV mice (B) showed a more robust CPP compared with controls [for Camk4 D1Cre heterozygous mice: t (14) = −2.06, P = 0.05; for rAAV-dnCaMKIV mice: t (15) = −2.1, P = 0.05].
Genetic Association Studies in Humans Indicate a Link Between CAMK4 and Addiction.
Prompted by the results from animal studies, we performed an analysis of the possible association of polymorphisms in human CAMK4 and CREB genes with cocaine dependence. Using a sample of 670 cocaine abusers and 726 controls from São Paulo, Brazil (35), we genotyped a restricted set of SNPs in the promoter regions of CAMK4 (rs919334, rs1457115, and rs9285875) and CREB (rs10876469 and rs2177000). To control for differential ethnic admixture in the heterogenous Brazilian sample, we corrected the association tests for the presence of population stratification using the program ADMIXMAP. We selected a total of 71 (64 SNPs and seven microsatellites) ancestry-informative markers (e.g., markers that exhibit large allele frequency differences between the three main Brazilian ancestral populations [Europeans, Africans, and Native Americans); details of marker set are available on request). Haplotype and association analysis was carried out with HAPLOVIEW software to examine haplotypes across all markers, with additional analyses being carried out in SPSS version 13. Of the markers rs1457115 and rs9285875, neither was associated with cocaine addiction (P = 0.63 and P = 0.11, respectively). However, rs919334 was strongly associated both allele- and genotype-wise (P = 0.001, allele-wise). The effect was recessive with a significant (P = 0.006) odds ratio of 1.47 (95% confidence interval: 1.18–1.83) for AA homozygotes after adjustment for stratification and gender effects (Table 1). Further, none of the CREB markers showed an association with cocaine addiction. Haplotype analysis failed to show any further effects and was nonsignificant (data not shown).
Table 1.
SNPs genotyped in CAMK4* and CREB† with allele frequencies: odds ratio (OR) for common homozygote with 95% confidence interval (CI)
| SNP | Alleles | Cases | Controls | Associated Genotype | OR | 95% CI | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs919334* | A/G | 70% | 64% | AA (50% vs. 40%) | 1.47 | 1.18–1.83 | 0.0005 |
| rs1457115* | C/T | 55% | 54% | CC | 1.04 | 0.83–1.32 | 0.71 |
| rs9285875* | C/T | 76% | 79% | CC | 0.86 | 0.7–1.07 | 0.19 |
| rs10876469† | T/G | 65% | 69% | TT | 1.12 | 0.9–1.39 | 0.3 |
| rs2177000† | A/G | 69% | 58% | AA | 1.11 | 0.89–1.38 | 0.36 |
Statistics are corrected for the effects of gender, age, and population stratification.
Discussion
The major finding of the present study is the demonstration that ablation of Camk4 in dopaminoceptive neurons results in increased psychomotor and reinforcing effects of cocaine. These effects are independent from acutely induced IEG expression or CREB-dependent transcription but rather involve mechanisms leading to long-term alterations in Fosb expression. Importantly, we show that the CAMK4 gene affects development of cocaine dependence in humans, because genetic variation in its promoter is significantly associated with cocaine addiction.
The apparent dichotomy between phenotypes associated with targeted Camk4 or Creb1/Crem deletions is intriguing. Although it has been reported that CREB activity in the NAc affects excitability of the medium spiny neurons and directly regulates locomotor responses to cocaine (36), we found that neither psychomotor sensitization to cocaine nor CPP was altered in the Creb1Camkcre4, Crem+/−, or Creb1Camkcre4, Crem−/− animals. This observation is in agreement with previous studies on behavioral effects of morphine in mice with Creb1 deletion in neurons (27) and the reported lack of impact of loss of major CREB isoforms on cocaine-induced reinstatement to CPP (37). Nevertheless, our observations differ from studies showing that CPP was enhanced in transgenic mice with deletion of the major CREB isoforms (22) and also in rats or mice injected with engineered herpesvirus expressing dominant-negative mCREB protein (20, 38). These discrepant results could be attributed to differences in the doses of cocaine used, mouse strain backgrounds, or other procedural differences such as biased vs. unbiased CPP procedures (33). However, we suggest that the critical difference could be the use of expression of engineered CREB variants vs. targeted Creb1 deletions. First of all, the combined deletion of Creb1 and Crem leads to progressive neuronal degeneration (25), which was a main reason for including the Creb1Camkcre4, Crem+/− line in this study. The neurodegeneration was not reported with any of the other genetic approaches (20, 22, 37); hence, CREB activity was not abolished completely. Furthermore, the dominant negative CREB proteins will not only act on the CRE sequences in gene promoters but also compete with endogenous CREB for protein-protein interactions. This may lead to phenotypes resulting from interference with activity of CREB interacting proteins and not necessarily CREB-dependent transcription. In conclusion, we think that elucidating the molecular differences between these approaches may actually lead to clarifying the role of CREB in neuronal plasticity in general.
Targeted ablation of Camk4 in dopaminoceptive neurons resulted in an augmented cocaine-induced acute response and long-term sensitization as well as reinstatement. Moreover, the Camk4D1Cre mice spent significantly more time in the cocaine-conditioned compartment in the CPP test compared with control littermates, demonstrating enhanced reinforcement. This effect was dependent on gene dosage, and the confirmation in rAAV-treated animals expressing a dominant-negative variant of the CaMKIV in the NAc argues strongly for a CaMKIV-dependent mechanism. It is unlikely that the stronger CPP observed in Camk4D1Cre mice was associated with enhanced learning ability because it did not affect the subsequent extinction of the cocaine-conditioned behavior or habituation to novelty. Furthermore, these observations have relevance to effects of cocaine in humans, because a nucleotide polymorphism in the CAMK4 promoter, rs919334, was significantly associated with cocaine addiction. The caveat applies that the effect size of the observed association is low, and this finding will require replication in similarly large, independent, case-control samples. However, the rs919334 association is robust to conservative multiple testing correction.
On the cellular level, we observed that levels of Ser 133 phosphorylated CREB were decreased in the striatum of Camk4D1Cre mice. Loss of CaMKIV also led to increased phosphorylation of HDAC4, which should enhance export from the cell nucleus and inhibit its function. Virally mediated expression of HDAC4 in the NAc is reported to decrease the rewarding properties of cocaine dramatically (39). Thus, CaMKIV-dependent regulation of HDAC4 activity could be involved in calibrating the response to cocaine. This is interesting in the context of observed changes in expression of Fosb and Pdyn in striatum and NAc of cocaine-sensitized mice, particularly because the phenotype observed in Camk4D1Cre closely resembles the one observed in case of overexpression of ΔFosB (31). We discovered a putative CaMKIV-dependent splicing site (CaRRE) surrounding the 5′ side of the exon V, which is alternatively spliced to produce the ΔFosB or FosB protein. Nevertheless, we found no significant change in the ΔFosB/FosB ratio after CaMKIV loss. In summary, although our results argue against a simplistic link between acute gene expression and behavioral outcome, they support a proposed role of epigenetic mechanisms in the development of addiction (39, 40).
In conclusion, we demonstrate that the activity of CaMKIV regulates susceptibility to cocaine in laboratory animals and in humans. Furthermore, we find that this phenomenon is dissociated from CREB-dependent transcription and IEG induction.
Materials and Methods
Animals.
Mice with ablation of the Camk4 gene in neurons expressing the dopamine receptor 1 (Drd1a) were generated by the crossing the strain carrying the loxP-flanked Camk4 gene (24) and mice harboring the Cre recombinase under the control of the D1 promoter (25, 26). We also used 5–6-week-old Creb1Camkcre4, Crem−/− mice (before onset of neurodegeneration) and 5–10-week-old Creb1Camkcre4, Crem+/− mice with littermate controls (Creb1loxP/loxP, Crem+/− and Creb1loxP/loxP, Crem−/−) (25). The intra-accumbal injections of the recombinant adenoassociated virus expressing a kinase-dead mutant of CaMKIV were performed as described previously (34). The experiments were approved by the Committee on Animal Care and Use of the relevant local governmental body and were carried out following the German Law on the Protection of Animals.
Immunohistochemistry.
The dissected brains were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, cut at 50 μm, and then processed for immunohistochemical detection with diaminobenzidine (Sigma–Aldrich Chemie GmbH). Staining of CREB was performed as described previously (25). Please see SI Methods for additional information.
Expression Profiling.
Profiling of acutely induced gene expression was performed on Camk4D1Cre animals and controls that were injected once with 25 mg/kg cocaine (Sigma–Aldrich Chemie GmbH) or saline. One hour later, animals were killed and the brains were dissected and fixed overnight into RNALater solution (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbHH). Then, 125-μm-thick vibratome sections were prepared, and the striatum, including the NAc, was microdissected under a binocular. RNA was prepared with the Rneasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). Microarray experiments were carried out using Mouse Genome 430A 2.0 arrays (Affymetrix) according to manufacturer's instruction. There were six chips hybridized for each cocaine group and three for saline-treated groups. Each chip corresponds to a single animal.
Behavioral Studies.
Behavioral sensitization was tested in activity chambers by injecting cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) for 5 consecutive days. Animals were challenged again with cocaine on days 12 and 19 after the first injection. CPP was induced by eight alternating injections of cocaine (5 or 10 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline into the corresponding compartment of the apparatus. Then, CPP was extinguished, and mice received a priming injection of cocaine (3 mg/kg, i.p.). The CPP score represents the difference between the time spent (seconds) in the cocaine or saline-paired floor during the test day (test duration: 900 sec).
Human Genetic Association Studies.
Six hundred seventy cocaine abusers, 643 male and 27 female (mean age = 26.8 years, SD = 7.2), were ascertained. The study group consisted of drug users who were in treatment from August 1997 to October 1998 in one outpatient and six inpatient units located in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older, a history of cocaine abuse, and under drug treatment at the selected centers. Complete description of the methodology is provided in SI Methods.
Data Analysis and Statistics.
Results were analyzed as appropriate with t tests or two-way ANOVAs, followed by the Newman-Keuls posthoc test. The data are presented as mean ± SEM, and in all the cases, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments.
We thank Dr. Norbert Gretz for his assistance in performing the DNA microarray experiments. Brain samples from FosB KO mice were a generous gift from Dr. Katarzyna Kalita and Dr. Leszek Kaczmarek. We thank Anna Schuler for her excellent technical assistance. This work was supported in part by National Genome Research Network plus AZ: 01GS08152 and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft/SFB636 (R.S. and G. Schütz) and EU/IMAGEN and EU/PHECOMP (R.S. and G. Schumann). G.B. and S.D. were supported by the United Kingdom Department of Health National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at Institute of Psychiatry (King's College London). C.S-S. was supported by a contract of the Ramón y Cajal program (Minisiterio de Educación y Ciencia, Spain). C.G. was supported by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. F.R.F. and A.B. received funds from the Institute of Health Carlos III Red RTA G06/001, Plan Nacional Sobre Drogas y Proyectos de Excelencia de la Consejeria de Innovación, Junta de Andalucia. The work of M.K. was carried out in the laboratory of Hilmar Bading, Department of Neurobiology, University of Heidelberg, and was supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (Wolfgang-Paul-Prize to Hilmar Bading). D.E. was supported by a European Molecular Biology Organization fellowship.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. G.F.K. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.
Data deposition: Gene expression profiling data have been deposited with the Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE10869).
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/0803959105/DCSupplemental.
References
- 1.Guzowski JF. Insights into immediate-early gene function in hippocampal memory consolidation using antisense oligonucleotide and fluorescent imaging approaches. Hippocampus. 2002;12:86–104. doi: 10.1002/hipo.10010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lonze BE, Ginty DD. Function and regulation of CREB family transcription factors in the nervous system. Neuron. 2002;35:605–623. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00828-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mayr B, Montminy M. Transcriptional regulation by the phosphorylation-dependent factor CREB. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:599–609. doi: 10.1038/35085068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bito H, Deisseroth K, Tsien RW. CREB phosphorylation and dephosphorylation: a Ca(2+)- and stimulus duration-dependent switch for hippocampal gene expression. Cell. 1996;87:1203–1214. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81816-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jensen KF, Ohmstede CA, Fisher RS, Sahyoun N. Nuclear and axonal localization of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type Gr in rat cerebellar cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:2850–2853. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.7.2850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ohmstede CA, Jensen KF, Sahyoun NE. Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase enriched in cerebellar granule cells. Identification of a novel neuronal calmodulin-dependent protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:5866–5875. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jones DA, Glod J, Wilson-Shaw D, Hahn WE, Sikela JM. cDNA sequence and differential expression of the mouse Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV gene. FEBS Lett. 1991;289:105–109. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(91)80919-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ho N, et al. Impaired synaptic plasticity and cAMP response element-binding protein activation in Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase type IV/Gr-deficient mice. J Neurosci. 2000;20:6459–6472. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-17-06459.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wu JY, et al. Spermiogenesis and exchange of basic nuclear proteins are impaired in male germ cells lacking Camk4. Nat Genet. 2000;25:448–452. doi: 10.1038/78153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kang H, et al. An important role of neural activity-dependent CaMKIV signaling in the consolidation of long-term memory. Cell. 2001;106:771–783. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00497-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Marie H, Morishita W, Yu X, Calakos N, Malenka RC. Generation of silent synapses by acute in vivo expression of CaMKIV and CREB. Neuron. 2005;45:741–752. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chawla S, Hardingham GE, Quinn DR, Bading H. CBP: A signal-regulated transcriptional coactivator controlled by nuclear calcium and CaM kinase IV. Science. 1998;281:1505–1509. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5382.1505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Impey S, et al. Phosphorylation of CBP mediates transcriptional activation by neural activity and CaM kinase IV. Neuron. 2002;34:235–244. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00654-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.McKinsey TA, Zhang CL, Lu J, Olson EN. Signal-dependent nuclear export of a histone deacetylase regulates muscle differentiation. Nature. 2000;408:106–111. doi: 10.1038/35040593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chawla S, Vanhoutte P, Arnold FJ, Huang CL, Bading H. Neuronal activity-dependent nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of HDAC4 and HDAC5. J Neurochem. 2003;85:151–159. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01648.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xie J, Black DL. A CaMK IV responsive RNA element mediates depolarization-induced alternative splicing of ion channels. Nature. 2001;410:936–939. doi: 10.1038/35073593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Berke JD, Paletzki RF, Aronson GJ, Hyman SE, Gerfen CR. A complex program of striatal gene expression induced by dopaminergic stimulation. J Neurosci. 1998;18:5301–5310. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-14-05301.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Graybiel AM, Moratalla R, Robertson HA. Amphetamine and cocaine induce drug-specific activation of the c-fos gene in striosome-matrix compartments and limbic subdivisions of the striatum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:6912–6916. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.17.6912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hope B, Kosofsky B, Hyman SE, Nestler EJ. Regulation of immediate early gene expression and AP-1 binding in the rat nucleus accumbens by chronic cocaine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5764–5768. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.13.5764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Carlezon WA, Jr, et al. Regulation of cocaine reward by CREB. Science. 1998;282:2272–2275. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5397.2272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Tzschentke TM. Measuring reward with the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm: Update of the last decade. Addict Biol. 2007;12:227–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2007.00070.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Walters CL, Blendy JA. Different requirements for cAMP response element binding protein in positive and negative reinforcing properties of drugs of abuse. J Neurosci. 2001;21:9438–9444. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-23-09438.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McClung CA, Nestler EJ. Regulation of gene expression and cocaine reward by CREB and DeltaFosB. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:1208–1215. doi: 10.1038/nn1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Casanova E, Fehsenfeld S, Greiner E, Stewart AF, Schutz G. Conditional mutagenesis of CamKIV. Genesis. 2002;32:161–164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mantamadiotis T, et al. Disruption of CREB function in brain leads to neurodegeneration. Nat Genet. 2002;31:47–54. doi: 10.1038/ng882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lemberger T, et al. Expression of Cre recombinase in dopaminoceptive neurons. BMC Neurosci. 2007;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Valverde O, et al. Modulation of anxiety-like behavior and morphine dependence in CREB-deficient mice. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29:1122–1133. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hummler E, et al. Targeted mutation of the CREB gene: Compensation within the CREB/ATF family of transcription factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:5647–5651. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yuferov V, et al. Differential gene expression in the rat caudate putamen after “binge” cocaine administration: Advantage of triplicate microarray analysis. Synapse. 2003;48:157–169. doi: 10.1002/syn.10198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lemberger T, Rodriguez Parkitna J, Chai M, Schutz G, Engblom D. CREB has a context-dependent role in activity-regulated transcription and maintains neuronal cholesterol homeostasis. FASEB J. 2008;22:2872–2879. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-107888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kelz MB, et al. Expression of the transcription factor deltaFosB in the brain controls sensitivity to cocaine. Nature. 1999;401:272–276. doi: 10.1038/45790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Engblom D, et al. Glutamate receptors on dopamine neurons control the persistence of cocaine-seeking. Neuron. 2008;59:20–32. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sanchis-Segura C, Spanagel R. Behavioural assessment of drug reinforcement and addictive features in rodents: An overview. Addict Biol. 2006;11:2–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2006.00012.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schneider M, Spanagel R, Zhang SJ, Bading H, Klugmann M. Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated suppression of Ca2+/calmodulin kinase IV activity in the nucleus accumbens modulates emotional behaviour in mice. BMC Neurosci. 2007;8:105. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Guindalini C, et al. A dopamine transporter gene functional variant associated with cocaine abuse in a Brazilian sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:4552–4557. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504789103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dong Y, et al. CREB modulates excitability of nucleus accumbens neurons. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9:475–477. doi: 10.1038/nn1661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kreibich AS, Blendy JA. cAMP response element-binding protein is required for stress but not cocaine-induced reinstatement. J Neurosci. 2004;24:6686–6692. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1706-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Barrot M, et al. CREB activity in the nucleus accumbens shell controls gating of behavioral responses to emotional stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:11435–11440. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172091899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kumar A, et al. Chromatin remodeling is a key mechanism underlying cocaine-induced plasticity in striatum. Neuron. 2005;48:303–314. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Renthal W, et al. Histone deacetylase 5 epigenetically controls behavioral adaptations to chronic emotional stimuli. Neuron. 2007;56:517–529. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





