Skip to main content
The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine logoLink to The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
. 2003;76(3):115–124.

Youth are more sensitive to price changes in cigarettes than adults.

Alexander Ding 1
PMCID: PMC2582704  PMID: 15369626

Abstract

Virtually all smoking begins in our population's youth and remains as a habit into those smokers' elder years. If we desire to halt smoking in its infancy, we should seek to deter and induce cessation in the youth years. It has been cited that taxation is an effective means to deter smoking at all ages, particularly efficacious in the youth population. This paper explores the merits of this method of preventative medicine, and intends to investigate differences between the price elasticity of cigarette demand between various cohorts, particularly the adult versus the youth population. We use a two-variable log-log, ordinary least-squares econometric regression to determine the extent that price alterations have on participation rates and quantity smoked. Our results show that youth are quite responsive to price increases showing a decrease of 14 percent prevalence in smoking for a 10 percent increase in price; whereas, the adult population is relatively less responsive to such price changes, exhibiting nearly a 2 percent decrease in prevalence for a 10 percent increase in price. We conclude that taxation is an effective means of socially-enacted preventative medicine in deterring youth smoking.

Full text

PDF
115

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chaloupka F. J., Wechsler H. Price, tobacco control policies and smoking among young adults. J Health Econ. 1997 Jun;16(3):359–373. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(96)00530-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Emery S., White M. M., Pierce J. P. Does cigarette price influence adolescent experimentation? J Health Econ. 2001 Mar;20(2):261–270. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00081-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hu T. W., Bai J., Keeler T. E., Barnett P. G., Sung H. Y. The impact of California Proposition 99, a major anti-smoking law, on cigarette consumption. J Public Health Policy. 1994 Spring;15(1):26–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Levy D. T., Cummings K. M., Hyland A. Increasing taxes as a strategy to reduce cigarette use and deaths: results of a simulation model. Prev Med. 2000 Sep;31(3):279–286. doi: 10.1006/pmed.2000.0696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Meier K. J., Licari M. J. The effect of cigarette taxes on cigarette consumption, 1955 through 1994. Am J Public Health. 1997 Jul;87(7):1126–1130. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine are provided here courtesy of Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine

RESOURCES