Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Hematol Oncol. 2008 Sep;26(3):148–151. doi: 10.1002/hon.852

Caspase polymorphisms and genetic susceptibility to multiple myeloma

H Dean Hosgood III 1,2,*, Dalsu Baris 1, Yawei Zhang 2, Yong Zhu 2, Tongzhang Zheng 2, Meredith Yeager 3, Robert Welch 3, Shelia Zahm 1, Stephen Chanock 1,4, Nathaniel Rothman 1, Qing Lan 1
PMCID: PMC2586415  NIHMSID: NIHMS78859  PMID: 18381704

Abstract

Multiple myeloma is a haematological malignency, characterized by clonal expansion of plasma cells. However, little is known about the cause of multiple myeloma. Cancer cells must avoid apoptosis to ensure unregulated tumour formation and growth. The highly conserved caspase cascade is essential to the regulation of the apoptotic pathway. To examine if five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in four caspase genes [CASP3 Ex8-280 C >A (rs6948), CASP3 Ex8 + 567 T >C (rs1049216), CASP8 Ex14-271 A >T (rs13113), CASP9 Ex5 + 32 G >A (rs1052576), CASP10 Ex3-171 A >G (rs39001150)] alter multiple myeloma risk, we conducted a population-based case-control study of women (128 cases; 516 controls) in Connecticut. Compared to individuals with the TT genotype of CASP3 Ex8 + 567 T >C, subjects with the CC genotype had a five-fold decreased risk of multiple myeloma (odds ratio (OR)CC = 0.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.0–1.0). Further, individuals with the AG and AA genotypes of CASP9 Ex5 + 32 G >A also experienced a decreased risk of multiple myeloma (ORAG = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.5–1.3; ORAA = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3–0.9; p-trend = 0.02). While no previous study has evaluated the association between caspase genes and multiple myeloma, studies have found associations with lung, breast, esophageal, gastric, colorectal and cervical cancers. Our parallel study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, which utilized the same controls, found strong evidence that caspase genes play a key role in lymphogenesis. The protective associations observed in two key caspase genes suggest that genetic variation in CASP genes may play an important role in the aetiology of multiple myeloma.

Keywords: multiple myeloma, caspase, variant, polymorphism, snp, risk factors

Introduction

Multiple myeloma is a B-cell malignancy often characterized by the increased production and secretion of monoclonal immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, IgD or IgE); however, an increase in Igs is not detectable in all cases [1]. Little is known about risk factors for multiple myeloma [2].

Apoptosis eliminates cells that jeopardize homeostasis and integrity of the organism [3]. A hallmark of cancer cells is their ability to avoid apoptosis and consequently persist and replicate unchecked in the body [4]. The two main apoptotic pathways in humans, the extrinsic or receptor-mediated pathway and the intrinsic or mitochondrial pathway, both utilize the caspase enzyme cascade. The extrinsic pathway utilizes caspase-8 and -10 as initiator caspases, while the intrinsic pathway employs caspase-9. Both pathways converge to use caspase-3, -6 and -7 as the effector caspases, which lead to cell death by nuclear membrane breakdown, DNA fragmentation, chromatin condensation and the formation of apoptotic bodies [5,6].

Studies of microarray profiling of genetically identical twins found at least a two-fold change in expression of CASP8 when comparing the gene expression of cells from the multiple myeloma patient and the healthy control [7]. Somatic mutations of CASP3 have also been identified in multiple myeloma tumours [8]. While no population-based study has evaluated the association between caspase genes and multiple myeloma, such studies have found variants in caspase genes to be associated with lung [911], breast [1113], esophageal [11], gastric [11], colorectal [11] and cervical cancers [11]. Our parallel study of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), which utilized the same controls, recently found strong evidence that variants in caspase genes play a key role in lymphogenesis [14]. We hypothesized the caspase variants we found to be associated with NHL or its subtypes would also be associated with genetic susceptibility to multiple myeloma. Therefore, we genotyped five single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in three initiator (CASP8, CASP9 and CASP10) and one effector (CASP3) caspase genes in a population-based case-control study.

Materials and methods

This population-based case-control study utilized histologically confirmed incident multiple myeloma female cases. Cases were diagnosed between 1996 and 2000, aged 21–84 years, residing in Connecticut (United States), with no previous diagnosis of cancer except non-melanoma skin cancer, and alive at the time of interview, as previously described [15]. Case interviews were obtained from 183 of the 323 eligible cases, yielding a 57% case response rate. Controls were recruited for a parallel population-based case-control study of NHL [16]. Random digit dialling methods for those below age 65 years (69% participation rate) and Health Care Financing Administration files for those 65 years and older (47% participation rate) were used to select female population-based controls (n = 691), aged 21–84 years.

Biologic sample collection and genotyping methods have been previously described [17]. Briefly, peripheral blood and buccal cells were used to extract genomic DNA using a phenol–chloroform extraction method (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Genotyping of the five SNPs [CASP3 Ex8-280 C >A (rs6948), CASP3 Ex8 + 567 T >C (rs1049216), CASP8 Ex14-271 A >T (rs13113), CASP9 Ex5 + 32 G >A (rs1052576), CASP10 Ex3-171 A >G (rs39001150)] was successful for 128 cases and 516 controls. Candidate genes were selected a priori based on minor allele frequencies of greater than 5% in the SNP500Cancer database and plausibility of contribution to the aetiology of multiple myeloma. Genotyping was performed by real-time PCR on the ABI 7900HT sequence detection system (http://snp500cancer.nci.nih.gov). Blinded duplicate samples from 100 study subjects and 40 replicate samples from each of two blood donors were interspersed throughout the plates used for genotype analysis. A duplicate quality control sample analysis yielded a QC concordance rate of >99%.

All statistical methods were performed using SAS software, version 9.1 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC). Demographic characteristics were compared in cases and controls by the χ2 test. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) for each SNP was tested with a Pearson χ2 test among controls. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by unconditional logistic regression, adjusting for age (<50, 50–9, 60–9, >70). Exact tests were used when cell counts were less than 5. Since further adjustment for race (Caucasian, African American) yielded similar results, results reported here are only age adjusted. Gene dosage effects were determined by assigning ordinal values for the subject’s number of variant alleles [1,2,3] to a genotype trend variable. Haplotype frequencies for CASP3 were estimated by the expectation-substitution approach and the global score test was used to determine the overall differences in haplotype frequencies between Caucasian cases and Caucasian controls, adjusted for age [18,19]. All haplotype analyses were performed with SAS genetics.

The study was approved by the Yale University School of Medicine’s Human Investigations Committee, the Connecticut Department of Public Health and the National Cancer Institute’s Special Studies Institutional Review Board.

Results

Cases were slightly older (p = 0.02) and had a higher percentage of black women (10.9%) than controls (2.7%) (Table 1). All SNPs were in HWE among controls (p >0.05). CASP9 Ex5 + 32A was significantly (ORAG = 0.8, 95% CI = 0.5–1.3; ORAA = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3–0.9; p-trend = 0.02) and CASP3 Ex8 + 567C was borderline (ORCC = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.0–1.0; p-trend = 0.16) associated with a decreased risk of multiple myeloma when adjusting for age (Table 2). While not significant, CASP8 Ex14-271T was suggestive of decreased risk. The two CASP3 polymorphisms were in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) (D′= 0.98) but moderately correlated (R2 = 0.37). Haplotype analysis of the two CASP3 SNPs yielded no significant association with multiple myeloma risk. No significant gene–gene interactions were observed for the five CASP SNPs.

Table 1.

Characteristics of multiple myeloma cases and controls

Cases % Controls % p-value
Age (years) 0.02
 <50 10 7.8 93 18.0
 50–59 26 20.3 94 18.2
 60–69 41 32.0 119 23.1
 70+ 51 39.9 210 40.7
Race <0.001
 White 114 89.1 502 97.3
 Black 14 10.9 14 2.7
Education 0.07
 Graduate degree/professional 11 8.6 73 14.1
 College degree 17 13.3 102 19.8
 Vocational/some college 37 28.9 151 29.3
 High school graduate 44 34.4 130 25.2
 <12 years 19 14.8 60 11.6

Table 2.

Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association of CASP polymorphisms and risk of multiple myeloma

Genotype Cases (%) Controls (%) OR* (95% CI) p-value p-trend
CASP3 Ex8-281C >A (rs6948)
 CC 36 (29) 132 (26)
 AC 56 (46) 260 (51) 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 0.36
 AA 31 (25) 120 (23) 1.0 (0.6–1.7) 0.88
 AC or AA 87 (71) 380 (74) 0.9 (0.6–1.3) 0.47 0.84
CASP3 Ex8 + 567T >C (rs1049216)
 TT 69 (57) 265 (52)
 CT 51 (42) 208 (41) 1.0 (0.6–1.4) 0.83
 CC 2 (2) 33 (7) 0.2 (0.0–1.0) 0.05
 CT or CC 53 (43) 241 (48) 0.9 (0.6–1.3) 0.46 0.16
CASP8 Ex14-271A > T (rs13113)
 TT 43 (36) 179 (35)
 AT 61 (51) 237 (47) 1.1 (0.7–1.6) 0.79
 AA 16 (13) 91 (18) 0.7 (0.4–1.4) 0.31
 AT or AA 77 (64) 328 (65) 1.0 (0.6–1.5) 0.88 0.45
CASP9 Ex5 + 32G > A (rs1052576)
 GG 41 (33) 130 (25)
 AG 65 (52) 252 (49) 0.8 (0.5–1.3) 0.41
 AA 20 (16) 129 (25) 0.5 (0.3–0.9) 0.02
 AG or AA 85 (67) 381 (75) 0.7 (0.5–1.1) 0.12 0.02
CASP10 Ex2-171A > G (rs3900115)
 AA 28 (23) 122 (24)
 AG 61 (50) 256 (51) 1.0 (0.6–1.7) 0.90
 GG 32 (26) 125 (25) 1.1 (0.6–2.0) 0.71
 AG or GG 93 (77) 381 (76) 1.1 (0.7–1.7) 0.81 0.71
*

Adjusted for age.

Exact test.

Discussion

Literature on the genetic susceptibility to multiple myeloma is sparse. To the best of our knowledge, no published study has previously examined the association between variants in caspase genes and risk of multiple myeloma. The protective associations observed for polymorphisms in two of the four key caspase genes, CASP3 Ex8 + 567 T >C and CASP9 Ex5 + 32 G >A, suggest that genetic variation in CASP genes may play an important role in the aetiology of multiple myeloma.

Evidence from capase-3 knock-out mouse models and caspase-3 null cell lines show that CASP3 is essential to the regulation of B-cell homeostasis, through chromatin margination, DNA fragmentation, nuclear collapse and cleavage of many key players involved in apoptosis [2024]. While caspase-3 appears to be the crucial player in apoptosis, some of the effects seen may be resulting from the activation of other unknown downstream components. For example, caspase-3 or a related protease is responsible for the cleavage of 42 of the 58 known caspase substrates [6,25]. Further research is needed to determine the functionality of the two CASP3 variants in our study and to determine if our results could be explained by other variants in linkage disequilibrium with our variants that are associated with risk of multiple myeloma.

CASP9 was the only initiator caspase in our study to be associated with risk of multiple myeloma. CASP9 is a member of the intrinsic pathway, which is activated as a result of mitochondrial damage and cytochrome c release. After cytochrome c is released into the cytoplasm, it complexes with APAF-1 and forms the apoptosome with procaspase-9 and activates the caspase-9 cascade. Caspase-3 is then activated, leading to cell death [26]. Mouse models of mutant caspase-9 and caspase-9 knock-out mice have been associated with perinatal and postnatal lethality [2729]. Caspase-8 and -10 are initiator caspases of the extrinsic apoptosis pathway which may be redundant and not essential for activation of the executioner caspases, since activation can occur independently by either caspase-8 or -10 in the extrinsic pathway [28,30,31].

Similar to these findings, our parallel population-based case-control study of NHL (461 cases; 535 controls), which evaluated the same SNPs as the current study, found CASP3 Ex8 + 567 T >C and CASP9 Ex5 + 32 G >A to be associated with a significantly decreased risk of NHL, another haematological malignancy [14]. The allele frequencies for our non-Hispanic Caucasian controls are similar to those in the SNP500 database, indicating that our controls are representative and it is highly unlikely that the similar findings found in multiple myeloma and NHL are due to the use of the same controls. Further, the CASP9 -1263A >G (rs4645978) and -712C >T (rs4645981) polymorphisms significantly decreased and significantly increased risk of lung cancer in Koreans, respectively [9]; however, the CASP9 -905T >G (rs4645980) and -293del (rs4645982) polymorphisms were not associated with lung cancer risk. The IVS12-19G >A, but not -678del (rs numbers not reported), polymorphism in the CASP8 gene was also associated with small cell lung cancer in this population [10]. Variants of caspase genes (CASP8 D302I and CASP10 V410I) have also been associated with reduced risk of breast cancer [12,13]. Recently, an analysis of Han Chinese case-control studies, totaling 4995 cancer patients and 4972 controls, found that a six nucleotide deletion in the promoter region of CASP8 was associated with lung, breast, esophageal, gastric, colorectal and cervical cancers [11].

This study adds to the limited data available on genetic susceptibility to multiple myeloma. Our study had a low response rate, which could potentially introduce selection bias. However, a recent study has found that genotyping frequencies for different genes in several pathways are very similar based on participation status [32]. Furthermore, this was a study of predominantly caucasians; however, results adjusted for both race and age were similar to those adjusted for only age. Finally, the moderate sample size may lead to false positive and false negative findings [33].

In conclusion, this population-based case-control study is the first, to our knowledge, to report decreased risks of multiple myeloma associated with variants in caspase genes. The protective associations observed for polymorphisms in two of the four key caspase genes, CASP3 Ex8 + 567 T >C and CASP9 Ex5 + 32 G >A, suggest that genetic variation in CASP genes may play an important role in the aetiology of multiple myeloma. Further replication studies or pooled analyses are needed to confirm our findings.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Yale University—National Cancer Institute Partnership Pre-Doctoral Fellowship Training Program (NCI TU2 CA105666). This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under contract N01-CO-12400. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government.

References

  • 1.Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(18):1860–1873. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.De Roos A, Baris D, Weiss N. Multiple myeloma. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF, editors. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 3. Oxford University Press; New York: 2006. pp. 946–970. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Raff M. Cell suicide for beginners. Nature. 1998;396(6707):119–122. doi: 10.1038/24055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100(1):57–70. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81683-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hajra KM, Liu JR. Apoptosome dysfunction in human cancer. Apoptosis. 2004;9(6):691–704. doi: 10.1023/B:APPT.0000045786.98031.1d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nicholson DW, Thornberry NA. Caspases: killer proteases. Trends Biochem Sci. 1997;22(8):299–306. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(97)01085-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Munshi NC, Hideshima T, Carrasco D, et al. Identification of genes modulated in multiple myeloma using genetically identical twin samples. Blood. 2004;103(5):1799–1806. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-02-0402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Soung YH, Lee JW, Kim SY, et al. Somatic mutations of CASP3 gene in human cancers. Hum Genet. 2004;115(2):112–115. doi: 10.1007/s00439-004-1129-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Park JY, Park JM, Jang JS, et al. Caspase 9 promoter polymorphisms and risk of primary lung cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 2006;15( 12):1963–1971. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddl119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Son JW, Kang HK, Chae MH, et al. Polymorphisms in the caspase-8 gene and the risk of lung cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2006;169(2):121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2006.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sun T, Gao Y, Tan W, et al. A six-nucleotide insertion-deletion polymorphism in the CASP8 promoter is associated with susceptibility to multiple cancers. Nat Genet. 2007;39(5):605–613. doi: 10.1038/ng2030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Frank B, Hemminki K, Wappenschmidt B, et al. Association of the CASP10 V410I variant with reduced familial breast cancer risk and interaction with the CASP8 D302H variant. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27(3):606–609. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.MacPherson G, Healey CS, Teare MD, et al. Association of a common variant of the CASP8 gene with reduced risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(24):1866–1869. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lan Q, Zheng T, Chanock S, et al. Genetic variants in caspase genes and susceptibility to non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Carcinogenesis. 2007 Apr 28;4:823–827. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hosgood HD, III, Baris D, Zahm SH, Zheng T, Cross AJ. Diet and risk of multiple myeloma in Connecticut women. Cancer Causes Control. 2007 Dec 18;10:1065–1076. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9047-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zheng T, Holford TR, Leaderer B, et al. Diet and nutrient intakes and risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Connecticut women. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(5):454–466. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwh067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Brown EE, Lan Q, Zheng T, et al. Common variants in genes that mediate immunity and risk of multiple myeloma. Int J Cancer. 2007 Jun 15;120(12):2715–2722. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zaykin DV, Westfall PH, Young SS, Karnoub MA, Wagner MJ, Ehm MG. Testing association of statistically inferred haplotypes with discrete and continuous traits in samples of unrelated individuals. Hum Hered. 2002;53(2):79–91. doi: 10.1159/000057986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kraft P, Cox DG, Paynter RA, Hunter D, De VI. Accounting for haplotype uncertainty in matched association studies: a comparison of simple and flexible techniques. Genet Epidemiol. 2005;28( 3):261–272. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Woo M, Hakem R, Furlonger C, et al. Caspase-3 regulates cell cycle in B cells: a consequence of substrate specificity. Nat Immunol. 2003;4(10):1016–1022. doi: 10.1038/ni976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zheng TS, Schlosser SF, Dao T, et al. Caspase-3 controls both cytoplasmic and nuclear events associated with Fas-mediated apoptosis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(23):13618–13623. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Janicke RU, Sprengart ML, Wati MR, Porter AG. Caspase-3 is required for DNA fragmentation and morphological changes associated with apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(16):9357–9360. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.16.9357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Janicke RU, Ng P, Sprengart ML, Porter AG. Caspase-3 is required for alpha-fodrin cleavage but dispensable for cleavage of other death substrates in apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(25):15540–15545. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.25.15540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Slee EA, Adrain C, Martin SJ. Executioner caspase-3, -6, and -7 perform distinct, non-redundant roles during the demolition phase of apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(10):7320–7326. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008363200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Porter AG, Janicke RU. Emerging roles of caspase-3 in apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 1999;6(2):99–104. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shivapurkar N, Reddy J, Chaudhary PM, Gazdar AF. Apoptosis and lung cancer: a review. J Cell Biochem. 2003;88(5):885–898. doi: 10.1002/jcb.10440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hakem R, Hakem A, Duncan GS, et al. Differential requirement for caspase 9 in apoptotic pathways in vivo. Cell. 1998;94(3):339–352. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81477-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vaux DL, Korsmeyer SJ. Cell death in development. Cell. 1999;96( 2):245–254. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80564-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kuida K, Haydar TF, Kuan CY, et al. Reduced apoptosis and cytochrome c-mediated caspase activation in mice lacking caspase 9. Cell. 1998;94(3):325–337. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81476-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kischkel FC, Lawrence DA, Tinel A, et al. Death receptor recruitment of endogenous caspase-10 and apoptosis initiation in the absence of caspase-8. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(49):46639–46646. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M105102200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Milhas D, Cuvillier O, Therville N, et al. Caspase-10 triggers bid cleavage and caspase cascade activation in FasL-induced apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(20):19836–19842. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M414358200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bhatti P, Sigurdson AJ, Wang SS, et al. Genetic variation and willingness to participate in epidemiologic research: data from three studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(10):2449–2453. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wacholder S, Chanock S, Garcia-Closas M, El GL, Rothman N. Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(6):434–442. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES