Skip to main content
Journal of Nematology logoLink to Journal of Nematology
. 2006 Dec;38(4):411–417.

Description and SEM Observations of Stegelletina coprophila sp.n. (Nematoda: Rhabditida) from Caves of Andalucía Oriental, Spain

J Abolafia 1, R Peña-Santiago 1
PMCID: PMC2586473  PMID: 19259457

Abstract

A new species of the genus Stegelletina is described from caves of Andalucía Oriental (SE Iberian Peninsula). Stegelletina coprophila sp. n. is characterized by its body 386 to 536 μm long in females and 391 and 521 μm in males, lateral field with three incisures, lips bearing four tines, labial probolae 4 to 6 μm long and bifurcate, pharyngeal corpus 1.5 to 2.9 times isthmus length, spermatheca 18 to 43 μm long, postvulvar sac 0.5 to 1.6 times the corresponding body diameter long, female tail conical (24–34 μm, c = 14.2–17.2, c′ = 1.7–2.3), male tail conical (26–35 μm, c = 12.1–17.1, c′ = 1.4–1.8), spicules 20 to 25 μm long, and gubernaculum 10 to 13 μm long. Descriptions, measurements and illustrations, including SEM photographs, are provided for the species.

Keywords: Caves, Cephalobidae, description, Iberian Peninsula, morphology, new species, Stegelletina, SEM, taxonomy


Subterranean ecosystems have long been considered to be extreme environments, inhabited by only a few specialized species. However, cave fauna consist of an interesting variety of taxa; some of them are obligate cave dwellers (troglobites), edaphic (edaphobites) and aquatic (stygobites), meanwhile, others are either facultative cave dwellers (troglophiles), indifferent cave-soil dwellers (trogloxenes), or even accidentals (Welbourn, 1999; Culver and Sket, 2000).

Zoological studies carried out in these kinds of habitats are usually focused on arthropods (Welbourn, 1999; Culver and Sket, 2000; Reeves et al., 2000; Gibert and Deharveng, 2002), where nematodes are mentioned as “undetermined material” or “unidentified taxa.” Nevertheless, there are a few monographic contributions on cave nematodes (Joseph, 1879; Dudich, 1932; Altherr, 1938; Andrássy, 1959a, 1959b; Cayrol, 1967; Altherr, 1969, 1971; Eder, 1979; Abolafia, 2005) or that include some cavernicolous species (e.g., Andrássy, 1967; Eder, 1975; Sturhan, 1975).

Several species belonging to the genus Stegelletina Andrássy, 1984 have been recorded previously from the Iberian Peninsula (Abolafia and Peña-Santiago, 2003). This paper, part of a series on cephalobs from Andalucía Oriental (Abolafia et al., 2002), deals with a new species collected in caves.

Materials and Methods

Nematodes were extracted from soil samples (organic or guano material) that were collected from caves from the province of Jaén, Andalucía Oriental (see Abolafia, 2005) by Flegg's (1967) method and a somewhat modified Baermann's (1917) funnel technique. Nematodes obtained were later relaxed and killed by heat, fixed in 4% formaldehyde, and processed to anhydrous glycerine according to Siddiqi (1964). Measurements were taken using an ocular micrometer; drawings were made using a drawing tube attached to a Leica microscope, while LM pictures were made using a Nikon microscope provided with a videocamera. For SEM studies, fixed specimens were hydrated in distilled water, dehydrated in a graded ethanol and acetone series, critical point dried and coated with gold (Abolafia and Peña-Santiago, 2005), and observed with a JEOL JSM-5800 microscope. The terminology used for morphology of stoma and spicules follows the proposal by De Ley et al. (1995) and Abolafia and Peña-Santiago (2006), respectively.

Description

Stegelletina coprophila sp. n. (Figs. 13)

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Stegelletina coprophila sp. n. A: Neck region. B: Anterior end. C: Male posterior end. D: Entire female. E: Entire male. F: Female reproductive system. G-H: Female posterior end. I-J: Lip region (I: primary axil; II: secondary axil).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Stegelletina coprophila sp. n. (SEM). A-D: Anterior end (A,C: subventral left view; B: lateral left view; D: ventral view). E: Lateral field. F: Excretory pore region. G-H: Male tail.

Measurements: Are listed in Table 1 and are in micrometers excluding ratios.

Table 1.

Measurements (in μm) of females (n = 15) and males (n = 14) of Stegelletina coprophila sp. n.

graphic file with name 411tbl1.jpg

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Stegelletina coprophila sp. n. (LM). A: Anterior end. B: Entire female. C: Vulva region. D: Female posterior end. E: Lateral field. F: Male posterior end.

Female (n = 10): Body 412–536 μm long. Habitus ventrally curved, “C”-shaped. Body cylindrical, tapering gradually towards both ends, but more so towards the posterior one. Cuticle distinctly annulated; annuli 2 μm wide at midbody. Lateral field occupying 16–23% of midbody diameter, with three incisures fading out near tail terminus. Lips amalgamated two by two, slightly divided at labial papilla level, each one having straight margin at primary axil and dentate margin at secondary axil; this with four tines, the tine closer at primary axil being more elevated, bigger and slightly lobed (two minute lobes). Primary axils “U”-shaped, with one guarding process (lacking refractive elements). Secondary axils “V”-shaped, without guarding process (without refractive element). Three slender labial probolae 4–6 μm long, bifurcate, “Y”-shaped, with curved prongs (bull horn-like), frequently bent after fixation. Stoma cephaloboid. Cheilostom with spheroid rhabdia. Gymnostom narrower than cheilostom, and as wide as stegostom. Pharyngeal corpus slightly fusiform, 2.0–2.9 times isthmus length; metacorpus longer than procorpus. Isthmus slender. Basal bulb ovoid, bearing well developed valves. Nerve ring at 66–76% of neck length, at isthmus level. Excretory pore at 38–42 annuli from anterior end, at 77–89% of neck length, at basal bulb level, and in front of hemizonid. Deirid 45–47 annuli from anterior end, at 81–99% of neck length, at basal bulb or intestine level. Cardia conoid, surrounded by intestinal tissue. Intestine lacking major specializations. Rectum 0.9–1.3 times anal body width long. Reproductive system monodelphic-prodelphic, dextral to intestine. Ovary with flexures posterior to vulva. Oviduct short. Spermatheca well developed, 1.0–2.0 times the corresponding body diameter long, filled with spermatozoa. Uterus about two times body diameter long. Postvulvar sac 0.5–1.6 times the corresponding body diameter long, differentiated in a distal tubular part and a proximal swollen part. Vagina with thick walls at its distal part. Tail conical, ventrally straight, with 18–21 ventral annuli, with more or less rounded terminus. Phasmid located at 28–38% of tail length.

Male (n = 10): Body 425–521 μm long. Habitus ventrad curved, adopting “J” shape. Reproductive system monorchic. Testis reflexed ventrally anteriorly. Tail ventrad curved with more or less rounded terminus. Spicules consisting of elongated manubrium, conoid calamus, and ventrally curved lamina, with dorsal tip and ventral velum, and terminus more ventrally bent. Gubernaculum ventrally curved.

Population from Sima de los Murciélagos (see Table 1)

Very similar to type population, but having shorter body and little more anterior position of nerve ring, excretory pore and deirid.

Diagnosis

Stegelletina coprophila sp. n. is characterized by its body 386–536 μm long in females and 391–521 μm in males, lateral field with three incisures, lips bearing four tines, labial probolae 4–6 μm long and bifurcate, pharyngeal corpus 1.5–2.9 times isthmus length, spermatheca 18–43 μm long, postvulvar sac 0.5–1.6 times the corresponding body diameter long, female tail conical (24–34 μm, c = 14.2–17.2, c′ = 1.7–2.3), male tail conical (26–35 μm, c = 12.1–17.1, c′ = 1.4–1.8), spicules 20–25 μm long, and gubernaculum 10–13 μm long.

Relationships

The new species resembles S. ankyra (Thorne, 1925) Boström and De Ley, 1996, S. insubrica (Steiner, 1914) Boström and De Ley, 1996, S. kheirii Karegar, De Ley and Geraert, 1998, and S. pygmaea Abolafia and Peña-Santiago, 2003. It differs from all of them in the more posterior location of nerve ring, excretory pore and deirid (between basal part of isthmus and cardia-intestine junction vs. between medium part of isthmus and basal bulb). It can be distinguished from S. ankyra by the shape of its labial probolae (with “Y” or bull horn prongs vs. “T” shape), lips with shallow incisures (vs. lips with deep incisures [cf. Andrássy, 1984] resembling those found in the genus Teratocephalus de Man, 1876), and shorter female tail (1.7–2.3 times anal body width vs. 2.9 times). It differs from S. insubrica by having lip region with secondary axils bearing four pairs of tines (vs. secondary axils with two pairs of tines), and shorter female tail (c′ = 1.7–2.3 vs. c′ = 2.7, according with Steiner's drawing [1914: Fig. 4]) with rounded terminus (vs. acute), and different numbers of ventral annuli on the tail (18–21 vs. 24 according with Steiner (1914) and 25 according with Thorne (1925)). The material from Senegal described by De Ley et al. (1994) as Ypsylonellus cf. insubricus (Steiner, 1914) Andrássy, 1984 is also similar to the material described here, but it has less ventral annuli (18–21 vs. 13). It differs from S. kheirii by having longer body (386–536 vs. 295–370 μm in females) and different tail shape (conical with rounded terminus vs. conical with acute terminus). It can be distinguished from S. pygmaea by having longer body (386–536 μm in females and 391–521 μm in males vs. 364–401 μm in females and 376–415 μm in males), different labial axils morphology (“U”-shaped and lacking refractive elements vs. two “U”-shaped refractive elements at primary axils), and tail terminus shape (rounded vs. acute).

In the key to species identification published by Abolafia and Peña-Santiago (2003), this species is located at step 7 together with S. kheirii.

Type locality and habitat

Type population collected from a cave: Sima de la Fuente Negra, Villanueva del Arzobispo (province of Jaén), in soil with guano of Rhinolophus sp. (Mammalia, Chiroptera) obtained 15 m deep.

Other locality

Another isolate of the new species was collected from another cave: Sima de la Murcielaguina, Hornos (province of Jaén), in soil with organic material obtained 60 m deep.

Type material

Seven females (holotype and paratypes) and 18 males (paratypes) deposited in Departamento de Biología Animal, Universidad deJaén, Spain. One para-type female and one paratype male deposited in the nematode collection of the Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm (Sweden), and in the nematode collection of the Department of Nematology, University of California, Riverside (USA).

Etymology

The specific epithet refers to the habitat where the species was found.

Footnotes

The authors acknowledge Grupo Espeleológico de Villacarrillo (GEV), especially Toni Pérez Fernández, who collected the samples from the different caves examined; the assistance of Research Technical Services of University of Jaén (Spain) for the SEM study; and the financial support received from the project entitled “Fauna Ibérica VIII” (CGL2004–04680-C10–09/BOS).

This paper was edited by Zafar Handoo

Literature Cited

  1. Abolafia J. Algunos nematodos troglófilos encontrados en la provincia de Jaén. Espeleo (seccion Bio Espeleo) 2005;17:11–12. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abolafia J, Liébanas G, Peña-Santiago R. Nematodes of the order Rhabditida from Andalucía Oriental, Spain. The subgenus Pseudacrobeles Steiner, 1938, with description of a new species. Journal of Nematode Morphology and Systematics. 2002;4:137–154. [Google Scholar]
  3. Abolafia J, Peña-Santiago R. Nematodes of the order Rhabditida from Andalucía Oriental, Spain. The genus Stegelletina Andrássy, 1984, with description of two new species. Russian Journal of Nematology. 2003;11:37–53. [Google Scholar]
  4. Abolafia J, Peña-Santiago R. Nematodes of the order Rhabditida from Andalucía Oriental: Pseudacrobeles elongatus (de Man, 1880) comb. n. Nematology. 2005;7:917–926. [Google Scholar]
  5. Abolafia J, Peña-Santiago R. Nematodes of the order Rhabditida from Andalucía, Spain. The family Panagrolaimidae, with a compendium of species of Panagrolaimus and a key to their identification. Journal of Nematode Morphology and Systematics. 2006;8:133–160. [Google Scholar]
  6. Altherr E. La faune des mines de Bex, avec étude spéciale de nématodes. Revue Suisse de Zoologie. 1938;45:567–720. [Google Scholar]
  7. Altherr E. Contribution à la connaissance des Nématodes des grottes et des eaux interstitielles de Suisse. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles de Lausanne. 1969;70:331. [Google Scholar]
  8. Altherr E. Contribution à la connaissance des Nématodes cavernicoles de Roumanie. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles de Lausanne. 1971;71:335. [Google Scholar]
  9. Andrássy I. Nematoden auys der Tropfsteinhöhle “Baradla” bei Aggtelek (Ungarn), nebst einer Ubersicht der bisher aus Höhlen bekannten freilebenden Nematoden-Arten. Acta Zoologica Hungarica. 1959a;4:253–277. [Google Scholar]
  10. Andrássy I. Weitere Nematoden aus der Tropfsteinhöhle “Baradla. Acta Zoologica Hungarica. 1959b;5:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Andrássy I. Die Unterfamilie Cephalobinae (Nematoda: Cephalobidae) und ihre Arten. Acta Zoologica Hungarica. 1967;13:1–37. [Google Scholar]
  12. Andrássy I. Klasse Nematoda (Ordnungen Monhysterida, Desmoscolecida, Araeolaimida, Chromadorida, Rhabditida) Berlin, Deutschland: Akademie Verlag; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  13. Baermann G. Eine einfache Methode zur Auffindung von Ankylostomum (Nematoden) Larven in Erdproben. Geneeskunding Tijdschrift voor Nederlandsch-Indië. 1917;57:131–137. [Google Scholar]
  14. Boström S, De Ley P. Redescription of Cervidellus vexilliger (de Man, 1880) Thorne, 1937 (Nematoda: Cephalobidae) and taxonomical consequences. Fundamental and Applied Nematology. 1996;19:329–340. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cayrol JC. Contribution a l'étude de la faune nématologique de quelques grottes du sud de la France. Annales de Spéléologie. 1967;22:297–307. [Google Scholar]
  16. Culver DC, Sket B. Hotspots of subterranean biodiversity in caves and wells. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies. 2000;62:11–17. [Google Scholar]
  17. De Ley P, Hernández MA, Agudo J. A redescription of Ypsylonellus similis (Thorne, 1925) Andrássy, 1984, with descriptions of some related species (Nematoda: Cephalobidae) Fundamental and Applied Nematology. 1994;17:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  18. De Ley P, Van de Velde MC, Mounport D, Baujard P, Coomans A. Ultrastructure of the stoma in Cephalobidae, Panagrolaimidae and Rhaditidae, with a proposal for a revised stoma terminology in Rhabditida (Nematoda) Nematologica. 1995;41:153–182. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dudich E. Biologie der Aggteleker Tropfsteinhöle “Baradla” in Ungarn. Speläol. Monograph. 1932;13:1–24. [Google Scholar]
  20. Eder R. Zwei neue Funde von Stenonchulus troglodytes Schneider, 1940 (Onchulidae, Nematoda) Carinthia II (Klagenfurt), 165/85. 1975;30:291–294. [Google Scholar]
  21. Eder R. Zur Nematodenfauna der Hermannshöhle bei Kirchberg am Wechsen. Die Höhle. 1979;30:73–75. [Google Scholar]
  22. Flegg JJM. Extraction of Xiphinema and Longidorus species from soil by a modification of Cobb's decanting and sieving technique. Annals of Applied Biology. 1967;60:429–437. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gibert J, Deharveng L. Subterranean ecosystems: A truncated functional biodiversity. BioScience. 2002;52:473–481. [Google Scholar]
  24. Joseph G. Uber die in Krainer Trophsteingrotten einheimischen, frei lebenden Rundwurmer (Nematoden) Zoologischer Anzeiger. 1879;2:275–277. [Google Scholar]
  25. Karegar A, De Ley P, Geraert E. The genera Cervidellus Thorne, 1937 and Stegelletina Andrássy, 1984 (Nematoda: Cephalobidae) from Iran, with description of S. kheiriisp. n. Russian Journal of Nematology. 1998;6:23–36. [Google Scholar]
  26. Reeves WK, Jensen JB, Ozier JC. New Faunal and Fungal Records from Caves in Georgia, USA. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies. 2000;62:169–179. [Google Scholar]
  27. Siddiqi MR. Studies on Discolaimus spp. (Nematoda: Dorylaimidae) from India. Zeitschrift für Zoologische Systematik und Evolutionsforschung. 1964;2:174–184. [Google Scholar]
  28. Steiner G. Freilebende Nematoden aus der Schweiz. 2. Teil einer vorläufigen Mitteilung. Archiv für Hydrobiologie und Planktonkunde. 1914;9:420–438. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sturhan D. Ergebnisse der Forschungsreise auf die Azoren 1969. VII. Neue Feststellungen über Verbreitung und Okologie von Stenonchulus troglodytes (Nematoda, Enoplida) Boletim do Museu Municipal do Funchal. 1975;29:12–17. [Google Scholar]
  30. Thorne G. The genus Acrobeles von Linstow, 1887. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society. 1925;44:171–210. [Google Scholar]
  31. Welbourn WC. Invertebrate Cave Fauna of Kartchner Caverns, Arizona. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies. 1999;61:93–101. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of nematology are provided here courtesy of Society of Nematologists

RESOURCES