Abstract
4-Amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine phosphate (HMP-P) synthase catalyzes a complex rearrangement of 5-aminoimidazole ribonucleotide (AIR) to form HMP-P, the pyrimidine moiety of thiamin phosphate. The three-dimensional structures of HMP-P synthase and its complexes with the product HMP-P and a substrate analog imidazole ribotide were determined. The structure of HMP-P synthase reveals a homodimer in which each protomer comprises three domains: an N-terminal domain with a novel fold, a central (βα)8 barrel and a disordered C-terminal domain that contains a conserved CX2CX4C motif, suggestive of a [4Fe-4S] cluster. Biochemical studies have confirmed that HMP-P synthase is iron sulfur cluster dependent, that it is a novel member of the radical SAM superfamily and that HMP-P and 5′-deoxyadenosine are products of the reaction. Mössbauer and EPR spectroscopy confirm the presence of one [4Fe-4S] cluster. Structural comparisons reveal that HMP-P synthase is homologous to a group of adenosylcobalamin radical enzymes. This similarity supports an evolutionary relationship between these two superfamilies.
Thiamin pyrophosphate (ThDP, 1) is an essential cofactor in all forms of life and plays a key role in carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism1. The biosynthesis of ThDP has been extensively studied in prokaryotes and involves the separate formation of thiazole phosphate (TMP, 2) and 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine pyrophosphate (HMP-PP, 3) (Fig. 1a)1,2. These are then coupled to form thiamin monophosphate (ThMP, 4). A final phosphorylation gives ThDP, the biologically active form of the cofactor. The biosynthesis of ThDP in Saccharomyces cerevisiae utilizes a completely different biochemical pathway for which the details are just beginning to emerge3–5.
Figure 1.
The biosynthesis of thiamin pyrophosphate (a) Overall bacterial pathway. Aminoimidazole ribonucleotide 12 is converted to 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine phosphate 15 by HMP-P synthase (ThiC), which is phosphorylated by ThiD to give HMP pyrophosphate 3. The thiazole moiety 2 is biosynthesized from 1-deoxy-D-xyulose 5-phosphate 6, cysteine 8 and dehydroglycine 35. The dehydroglycine is generated from glycine (ThiO) in B. subtilis and from tyrosine (ThiH) in E. coli. The pyrimidine and thiazole are coupled by ThiE to give thiamin phosphate 4 and ThiL catalyzes the final phosphorylation. (b) Conversion of AIR 12 to the thiamin pyrimidine in bacteria and plants. The color coding indicates the source of non-hydrogen atoms in HMP-P as demonstrated by labeling studies. (c) Biosynthesis of thiamin pyrimidine in fungi. In fungi the pyrimidine moiety is derived from histidine 13 and pyridoxal 5′-phosphate 14 using a single enzyme, THI5p. The color coding indicates the source of non-hydrogen atoms. (d) The HMP-P synthase reactions. When Fe-S cluster loaded HMP-P synthase is reduced with dithionite, it reduces SAM 16 to generate methionine 28 and the 5′-deoxyadenosine (5-dAdo) radical 17, which is required by HMP-P synthase to convert AIR 12 to HMP-P 15.
The mechanistic enzymology of thiamin (5) thiazole (2) biosynthesis is now relatively well understood. The three identified pathways represented by Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis and S. cerevisiae have been reconstituted and most of the required enzymes have been mechanistically and structurally characterized2–6. Biosynthesis of the thiamin thiazole in E. coli requires five gene products and utilizes 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate (DXP, 6), tyrosine (7) and cysteine (8). The B. subtilis pathway is similar to that of E. coli but utilizes glycine (9) rather than tyrosine. Biosynthesis of the thiamin thiazole in yeast requires a single enzyme and utilizes nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD, 10), glycine and an unknown sulfur source4.
In contrast, very little is yet known about the mechanistic enzymology of thiamin pyrimidine (4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine; HMP, 11) formation; however, thiamin pyrimidine biosynthesis uses fundamentally different chemistry compared to that used for the biosynthesis of the nucleic acid pyrimidines. Labeling studies have established that HMP is derived from aminoimidazole ribonucleotide (AIR, 12) in bacteria (Fig. 1b)7,8 and from histidine (13) and PLP (14) in yeast (Fig. 1c)9. In each case, only a single gene is required for pyrimidine formation: thiC in bacteria, plants and algae and THI5 in yeast. Detailed studies, using isotopically labeled AIR, have established the origin of most of the atoms of HMP in bacteria (Fig. 1b). These studies were first carried out in vivo and later reproduced and expanded upon using 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine phosphate (HMP-P, 15) synthase in cell free extract7. The labeling studies have established that the C2′ carbon of the ribose is reduced to the methyl oxidation state and used to methylate the C2 position on the aminoimidazole and that the C4′ carbon of the ribose is inserted into the C4-C5 double bond of the aminoimidazole to generate the aminopyrimidine. The methyl hydrogens are derived from the C2′H, C3′H and from the buffer. This remarkable rearrangement reaction is the most complex unresolved rearrangement in primary metabolism.
Radical S-adenosylmethionine (SAM, 16) enzymes utilize SAM to generate an 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical (17) that in turn serves as an oxidant for a wide variety of enzymatic reactions10,11. For some enzymes SAM is regenerated at the completion of the reaction while for other enzymes SAM is a cosubstrate yielding 5′-deoxyadenosine (5-dAdo, 18) as a product. Bioinformatic studies have identified more than 600 possible members of the radical SAM superfamily12. The radical SAM superfamily is characterized by a CX3CX2C motif that harbors a [4Fe4S] cluster. Upon reduction, the cluster serves as a source of an electron to produce the 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical.
Prior to our studies, HMP-P synthase, the thiC gene product, was not reported to be a radical SAM enzyme, although some evidence existed. Previous studies showed a conserved CX2CX4C motif in HMP-P synthase and in Salmonella enterica the C581A, C584A and C589A mutant proteins were unable to biosynthesize the thiamin pyrimidine, suggesting that HMP-P synthase contained an iron-sulfur cluster13. This possibility was further supported by the observation that iron sulfur cluster biosynthetic mutants in S. enterica were thiamin requiring13 and by a recent study demonstrating that HMP-P synthase from Arabidopsis thaliana purifies with a chromophore that is consistent with a bound iron sulfur cluster14.
In this paper, we report the first successful reconstitution of purified bacterial HMP-P synthase, demonstrate that the enzyme is a previously unrecognized radical SAM enzyme utilizing SAM as a cosubstrate and producing HMP-P and 5′-deoxyadenosine as products, characterize the [4Fe-4S] cluster using Mössbauer and EPR spectroscopies and describe structures of the enzyme complexed with a substrate analog and with the product, HMP-P.
RESULTS
Chemical reconstitution of HMP-P synthase
Cell free extract from the Caulobacter crescentus HMP-P synthase overexpressing E. coli strain was subjected to chemical Fe-S cluster reconstitution by the addition of excess Fe2+ and S2− under strictly anaerobic conditions. After removal of the excess FeII and S2− by gel filtration, the resulting dark brown cell free extract was fractionated, again under strictly anaerobic conditions, by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. The protein thus obtained was dark brown in color, with a UV-visible spectrum suggestive of the presence of an iron sulfur cluster (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 1a). Analyses of bound iron and sulfide revealed 7.2 ± 0.3 irons and 5.4 ± 0.4 sulfides associated with per monomer.
Figure 2.
HMP-P synthase activity. (a) UV-Visible absorption spectrum of isolated, Fe-S cluster reconstituted, HMP-P synthase (25 μM; black trace) and its change upon reduction with 200 μM dithionite (gray trace). (b) In vitro reconstitution of HMP-P biosynthesis, analyzed by HPLC after converting HMP-P 15 to the fluorescent thiochrome phosphate 19. Enhanced product yield is observed when HMP-P synthase is subjected to chemical Fe-S cluster reconstitution. Blue and black traces represent reactions utilizing Fe-S cluster reconstituted and untreated HMP-P synthase lysate respectively; red trace represents a reaction lacking AIR 12. The thiochrome pyrophosphate 20 peak arises from thiamin pyrophosphate in lysate and stays constant. (c) Activity of Fe-S cluster reconstituted, purified HMP-P synthase. Sample 1 is reaction mixture containing HMP-P synthase, AIR, SAM, dithionite. Sample 2 is reaction 1 incubated aerobically. Samples 3, 4 and 5 are reaction 1 without SAM, AIR and dithionite respectively. (d) HPLC analysis of the HMP-P synthase reactions. Blue trace represents full reaction [HMP-P synthase, AIR, SAM and dithionite]; green trace, red trace and black trace represent the full reaction without AIR, SAM and dithionite respectively. Reaction products HMP-P 15 (rt = 2.5 min) and 5-dAdo 18 (rt = 18.45 min) were identified by comigration with authentic standards and subsequent spectroscopic characterization. Three sections of the chromatogram (1.5–2.7 min, 5–6 min, 18.3–18.6 min) are presented to clearly demonstrate the changes.
Activity of chemically reconstituted HMP-P synthase
Thiamin pyrimidine formation was initially assayed using the thiochrome assay (Supplementary Fig. 1b). In this assay, the product of HMP-P synthase is converted to thiamin phosphate enzymatically. This is then oxidized to the intensely fluorescent thiochrome phosphate (19), which can be readily detected by HPLC analysis with fluorescence detection.
The results of this assay are shown in Fig. 2b. The blue trace shows the HMP-P synthase activity in the Fe/S cluster reconstituted cell free extract. This activity is 14 fold higher than the activity observed with untreated HMP-P synthase in cell free extract (red trace) and supports the hypothesis that HMP-P synthase is an iron-sulfur cluster utilizing enzyme. The black trace shows the thiochrome phosphate present in the reconstituted sample in the absence of AIR. The thiochrome phosphate produced in this sample is due to the thiamin phosphate that copurifies with thiamin phosphate synthase15. The compound eluting at 9.3 min is thiochrome pyrophosphate (20) derived from enzyme-bound thiamin pyrophosphate in the cell free extract. The concentration of this compound is the same in all three samples.
Similar activity of HMP-P synthase was also achieved using the purified protein. This activity was dependent on SAM, AIR and reduction of the Fe/S cluster using dithionite (21) (Fig. 2c). The purified enzyme was rapidly inactivated by exposure to air.
Identification of the HMP-P synthase reaction products
The thiochrome assay for detecting the formation of HMP is highly sensitive and was very useful in searching for optimized reconstitution conditions; however, it is an indirect assay and does not give information on the phosphorylation state of HMP. This is because HMP and HMP-P are both substrates for the pyrimidine kinase and the phosphate is lost during thiamin formation16. In addition, we wished to determine the role SAM was playing in this reaction. With the optimized reconstitution of the HMP-P synthase in a defined system, the available levels of activity allowed us to assay directly for the products without thiochrome derivatization.
A reaction mixture containing AIR, SAM, dithionite and HMP-P synthase was directly analyzed by HPLC with UV detection. The resulting chromatogram for the complete reaction (blue trace) shows consumption of AIR and SAM and the production of two new species with retention times of 2.58 and 18.45 minutes (Fig. 2d,e). These reaction products were identified as HMP-P and 5′-deoxyadenosine, respectively, by comigration with authentic standards. For further verification, 1H NMR and ESI-MS analyses were performed on HPLC purified products, which confirmed the structural assignments (Supplementary Figs. 1c,d and 2a). Control reactions lacking SAM and dithionite, run under identical reaction conditions, did not show the production of HMP-P or 5-dAdo. A reaction run in the absence of AIR shows reduced levels of 5-dAdo formation suggesting that slow SAM reduction is occurring in the absence of AIR.
The reaction yield varied between protein preparations. Typically 75–150 μM HMP-P and 200–450 μM 5-dAdo are produced in a reaction containing 0.8–1.2 mM isolated HMP-P synthase (depending on the yield of the corresponding enzyme purification), 400 μM AIR and 800 μM SAM. Interestingly, the production of 5-dAdo was consistently higher (approximately 3-fold) than HMP-P and the product yields were enzyme concentration dependent (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Formation of HMP-P and 5-dAdo was very fast (Supplementary Fig. 3a) and was essentially complete within mixing time (30 s).
In vivo reconstitution of HMP-P synthase
Coexpression of Fe-S cluster utilizing proteins in E. coli containing pDB1282 plasmid is an established strategy for the in vivo reconstitution of the cluster. This plasmid encodes a set of proteins involved in iron sulfur cluster biogenesis (IscS, IscU, IscA, HscB, HscA and Fdx). Co-expression with pDB1282 significantly enhanced (4 fold) HMP-P synthase activity in cell free extract over a control experiment in which HMP-P synthase was expressed in the absence of pDB1282 (Supplementary Fig. 3b). Anaerobic purification led to pure protein, with 3.8 ± 0.3 irons and 4.4 ± 0.6 sulfides per monomer (Supplementary Fig. 3c). When 195 μM protein was incubated anaerobically with 200 μM AIR, 400 μM SAM and 5 mM dithionite, production of 110 ± 20 μM HMP-P and 230 ± 11 μM 5-dAdo was observed (Supplementary Fig. 4a).
Mössbauer spectroscopy
A sample of HMP-P synthase that was grown on media supplemented with the Mössbauer-active isotope 57Fe, and isolated under strict anaerobic conditions contained only 1.7 Fe and 1.2 sulfides per monomer. The Mössbauer spectrum (Supplementary Fig. 4b) reveals a quadrupole doublet with parameters typical of a [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster. The remaining Fe (two species) has parameters typical of high-spin FeII. We attribute the low stoichiometry (~0.2 [4Fe-4S]2+ cluster per HMP-P synthase ) to the rapid overexpression of HMP-P synthase despite the fact that the products of the isc genes from A. vinelandii were co-expressed. Therefore, we reconstituted anaerobically-isolated HMP-P synthase with additional 57FeII and sulfide in the presence of DTT (22). This sample contained 7.2 Fe and 5.4 sulfide per HMP-P synthase. The 4.2-K/53-mT Mössbauer spectrum of this sample is shown in Fig. 3a (hashed marks). The spectrum is dominated by several well-resolved lines, in addition to a broad and featureless absorption, which ranges from −5 mm s−1 to +5 mm s−1 and accounts for ~30% of the total intensity. EPR spectroscopy of an identical sample reveals no signals attributable to Fe/S clusters with S = 1/2 ground state ([3Fe-4S]+, [4Fe-4S]+, and [2Fe-2S]+), thereby ruling out the presence of these cluster types in this sample (vide infra). Consequently, the broad features are attributed to iron bound nonspecifically to HMP-P synthase17. The well-resolved lines can be simulated with three quadrupole doublets with the following parameters: δ1 = 0.45 mm s−1 and ΔEQ,1 = 1.12 mm s−1 (43 % of total intensity, 3.1 Fe per HMP-P synthase, blue); δ2 = 0.78 mm s−1 and ΔEQ,2 = 3.37 mm s−1 (18 % of total intensity, 1.3 Fe per HMP-P synthase, red); and δ3 = 1.26 mm s−1 and ΔEQ,3 = 3.02 mm s−1 (14% of total intensity, 1.0 Fe per HMP-P synthase, green). The parameters of the first quadrupole doublet are typical of [4Fe-4S]2+ clusters, suggesting that reconstituted HMP-P synthase has ~0.8 [4Fe-4S]2+. We therefore conclude that HMP-P synthase harbors one [4Fe-4S] cluster. The remaining two quadrupole doublets have parameters typical of FeII in a four-coordinate, sulfur-rich environment (doublet 2) and a five- or six-coordinate environment of hard N/O ligands (doublet 3)18. We speculate that one of the two FeII species may be bound in the mononuclear (His)2-ligated site that was identified from the X-ray structure (vide infra), but we cannot assign it without further knowledge of the coordination environment of the mononuclear site.
Figure 3.
EPR and Mossbauer spectroscopy of HMP-P synthase. (a) 4.2-K/53-mT Mössbauer spectrum of a sample of HMP-P synthase overexpressed in bacteria grown on 57Fe-supplemented media and further reconstituted with 57Fe, sulfide, and DTT (hashed marks). The solid lines are simulations with three quadrupole doublets using the parameters quoted in the text, representing [4Fe-4S]2+ clusters (blue), and two distinct high-spin FeII species (red and green). (b) EPR spectrum of an as-isolated sample of HMP-P synthase that was coexpressed with Isc cluster. Presence of an organic radical is noted with parameters mentioned in the text. (c) EPR spectrum of reconstituted HMP-P synthase. The sample (500 μM) was reduced with 10 mM dithionite before anaerobically loading into an EPR tube and freezing. The spectrum was obtained under the following conditions: microwave power, 101 μW; receiver gain, 3; modulation amplitude, 10 G; temperature, 13 K; microwave frequency, 9.5 GHz.
EPR spectroscopy
The EPR spectrum of as-isolated HMP-P synthase is largely silent; however, a weak narrow signal is observed at g = 2 and is still present at 77 K, suggestive of the presence of an organic radical (Fig. 3b). At present, the nature of this radical and its catalytic competence are unknown. Upon reduction of as-isolated or reconstituted HMP-P synthase in the presence of 10 mM dithionite, an axial spectrum emerges (Fig. 3c), displaying approximate g-values of 2.02 and 1.93, suggestive of a [4Fe-4S]+ cluster. Consistent with this assignment, the spectrum dramatically reduces in intensity at temperatures above 30 K, and is nearly unobservable above 50 K. Spin quantification indicates that the spectrum accounts for less than 0.1 equiv of spin per HMP-P synthase.
Structure of HMP-P synthase
The crystal structure of HMP-P synthase from C. crescentus was determined initially at 2.8 Å resolution. The overall structure is a homodimer with one dimer per asymmetric unit. Each protomer contains a bound metal ion, assigned as ZnII based on the peak height in difference electron density maps, and an HMP molecule, which in the beginning was thought to be a possible product and therefore added during crystallization. Each protomer consists of three domains (Fig. 4a). Domain 1 comprises the first 213 residues. This domain contains a novel fold consisting of six α-helices and five β-strands (Supplementary Fig. 5a,b). The secondary structural elements form a thin blanket-like structure that folds over domains 2 and 3. Domain 2 comprises residues 214–510 and has a (βα)8 barrel fold in which β-strands 6–13 make up the barrel core. Each β-strand is followed by one α-helix except β8 (α9 and α10) and β9 (α11, α12, α13 and α14). The bottom of the barrel (N-terminal end of the β-strands) is covered by β-strands 1 and 2 of domain 1. Domain 3 comprises residues 511–548. These residues form an antiparallel three helix bundle followed by a loop that extends into the top of the (βα)8 barrel of the adjacent protomer. The protein contains 76 additional C-terminal residues that are disordered in our structure. Two additional structures with different ligands and with resolutions of 2.0 Å were also determined. The complexes crystallized with a slightly smaller unit cell and did not contain the transition metal. All three structures showed the same general structural features with a disordered C-terminus. Refinement statistics are given in Supplementary Table 1.
Figure 4.
Structure of HMP-P synthase. (a) The HMP-P synthase homodimer. The protomer consists of three domains. The N-terminal domains are colored in shades of blue, the (βα)8 core domains are colored in shades of green and the C-terminal domains are colored in shades of red. HMP-P is shown as ball-and-stick. The final 66 amino acids are disordered; however, the final ordered residues, which immediately precede a conserved CX2CX4C motif, extend into the active site of the adjacent protomer. The C-terminal tail is anchored to the adjacent protomer by a three helix bundle motif located at the beginning of the C-terminal domain. (b) Stereoview of the HMP-P synthase active site with modeled SAM and the [4Fe-4S] cluster. The atoms are color coded by atom type (green = C, blue = N, red = O, yellow = S and orange = Fe). The substrate analog IMR 22 from the crystal structure is shown. Residues Cys561, Cys564 and Cys 569, SAM and the [4Fe-4S] cluster were modeled using biotin synthase as a guide. Hydrogen bonds are indicated by dotted lines. (c) Superposition of the (βα)8 domains from HMP-P synthase and biotin synthase (PDB ID 1r3o). HMP-P synthase is shown in blue and biotin synthase is shown in silver. The [4Fe-4S] cluster and SAM from biotin synthase are shown in ball-and-stick.
The HMP-P synthase homodimer has approximate dimensions of 100 Å × 60 Å × 48 Å (Fig. 4a). Dimer formation joins the two (βα)8 barrels in an approximately antiparallel arrangement and buries a total of 2800 Å2 (12.6%) of solvent accessible surface per monomer. The interface is mostly hydrophobic with 72.7% of the atoms nonpolar. The main interactions involve helices α16, α17, α18 (the last three helices in the (βα)8 barrel) and the three helix bundle (α19, α20, α21) at the beginning of domain 3.
HMP-P synthase active site
The HMP-P synthase active site was identified using complexes with HMP-P and imidazole ribotide (IMR, 23) (Supplementary Fig. 5c–e). The active site is within a cavity at the C-terminal end of the (βα)8 barrel, with 1300 Å2 of solvent accessible area and 1900 Å3 of solvent accessible volume (Fig. 4a). Most of the residues in the active site cavity are highly conserved among the HMP-P synthase orthologs (Supplementary Fig. 6). A large peak assigned as a ZnII with tetrahedral geometry is located within the active site and is coordinated by the Nε2 of His417, the Nε2 of His481, and two water molecules with unusually long distances (Supplementary Fig. 7a,b). While the identity of the transition metal remains uncertain, the B-factor during refinement is consistent with an assignment of ZnII.
The HMP-P site is located near the N-terminus of helix α12 and the C-terminus from the adjacent protomer. Hydrophobic residues Met248, Leu250, Val274 and Tyr440 line one side of the active site cavity. Atoms N1 and N2 of pyrimidine moiety form hydrogen bonds with the side chains of Glu414 and Ser474, respectively, assuming that the former is protonated. The phosphate-binding site is located at the N-terminus of α12 and is stabilized by the helix dipole (Supplementary Fig. 5e). Hydrogen bonds form with the amide nitrogen atom of Gly335, Oη of Tyr277, Nε2 of His313, Oγ of Ser333 and Nη1 of Arg377.
The phosphate binding site of IMR is similar to that of HMP-P, and the imidazole and ribose moieties generally overlap the pyrimidine binding site of the HMP-P structure. Atom N3 of the imidazole ring forms a hydrogen bond with the side chain of Asp347, assuming that it is protonated. The two hydroxyl groups of the ribose moiety of IMR are hydrogen bonded to the Oη of Tyr440 and Oδ of Asn219.
Modeling of a [4Fe-4S] cluster
Thus far four crystal structures of radical SAM enzymes with bound SAM are available from the Protein Data Bank: biotin (24) synthase (BioB; PDB ID 1r3o)19, HemN (PDB ID 1olt)20, MoaA (PDB ID 2fb3)21, and LAM (PDB ID 2a5h)22. Each displays a (βα)8 barrel or modified β-barrel fold in which SAM is ligated through its amino and carboxylate groups to a [4Fe-4S] cluster. When these four radical SAM enzymes are superimposed, the [4Fe-4S] clusters and SAM binding sites overlap well. Even though the CX3CX2C motifs of these enzymes are located near the N-terminus and the CX2CX4C motif of HMP-P synthase is located near the C-terminus, we superimposed the structure of biotin synthase onto HMP-P synthase in order to predict the location of its [4Fe-4S] site. After superposition, the [4Fe-4S] cluster is located in an open part of the HMP-P synthase active site with very few bad contacts between either the cluster or the amino acid residues of the cluster binding loop. Interestingly, the [4Fe-4S] cluster and its binding loop are juxtaposed with the final C-terminal residue visible in the HMP-P synthase X-ray structure. This final residue immediately precedes the conserved CX2CX4C motif of HMP-P synthase. Therefore, we used the biotin synthase backbone as a guide for threading the residues of the putative HMP-P synthase [4Fe-4S] binding domain. Following manual adjustment and energy minimization, the modeled [4Fe-4S] binding domain showed no bad contacts and had good geometry with the cysteine residues of the Cys561, Cys564, and Cys569 providing ligands for the iron atoms (Fig. 4b,c). Furthermore, the modeled cluster positions the SAM molecule near the ribose ring of the substrate analog IMR in an orientation, from which the adenosyl radical could abstract a hydrogen atom from the substrate ribose or from the protein to generate the organic radical shown in Fig. 3c.
Structural similarities to other proteins
A DALI search (www.ebi.ac.uk/dali) using the entire HMP-P synthase structure as the query failed to identify the radical SAM enzymes or any other structural homologs. However, a DALI search using only the (βα)8 barrel domain (residues 214 – 510) identified three of the radical SAM enzymes as structural homologs (Supplementary Table 2). Of these BioB gave the highest Z-score (13.0), while LAM and HemN gave DALI Z-scores of 5.9 and 5.1, respectively. Biotin synthase has a conventional (βα)8 barrel whereas LAM and HemN have modified barrels referred to as β-crescents, which probably accounts for the differences in Z-scores.
In addition to the radical SAM enzymes described above, the DALI search identified a group of adenosylcobalamin (AdoCbl, 25) radical enzymes that are also structural homologs with Z-scores ranging from 16.0 to 21.0 (Supplementary Table 2). The top two DALI Z-scores correspond to glutamate (26) mutase from Clostridium cochlearium23 (GM, PDB identifier 1cb7) and lysine (27) 5,6-aminomutase from Clostridium sticklandii24 (5,6-LAM, PDB identifier 1xrs). Furthermore, GM (Fig. 5a) and LAM (Fig. 5b) have tandem (βα)8 barrels that superimpose well on the HMP-P synthase homodimer. The catalytic domain (A) and the AdoCbl binding domain (B) are separate chains generating an (AB)2 heterotetramer.
Figure 5.
Cartoons depicting the domain assemblies of cobalamin-dependent enzymes with HMP-P synthase-like protomers and dimer interfaces. Each chain within a molecule is color coded differently. (a) Glutamate mutase from C. sticklandii. GM contains two identical catalytic subunits and two identical AdoCbl binding subunits, which cap the catalytic domains, forming an (AB)2 heterotetramer. (b) Lysine 5,6-amino mutase. 5,6-LAM forms an (AB)2 heterotetramer with an assembly similar to that of GM. (c) Methylmalonyl coenzyme A mutase from P. shermanii. The catalytic and AdoCbl binding domains are fused (A). The blue subunit (B) does not contain a catalytic site. (d) Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase corrinoid/iron-sulfur protein. The blue subunit contains a (βα)8 domain (B), with no catalytic site, fused to an MeCbl binding domain, which caps the active site of the catalytic domain (A). (e) HMP-P synthase from C. crescentus. HMP synthase is a homodimer. The (βα)8 core domain is fused to the predicted [4Fe-4S] binding domain. This domain is disordered in the crystal structure but the final ordered residues extend into the active site of the adjacent protomer and are preceded by a three helix bundle that anchors the C-terminus to the adjacent protomer.
The top 10 matches also include three other tandem (βα)8 barrel structures that superimpose well with the HMP-P dimer: a methionine (28) synthase domain from Thermotoga maritima (MetH, PDB identifier 1q7m, Z = 18.2)25, methylmalonyl-coenzyme A (29) mutase from Propionibacterium shermanii (MCM, PDB identifier 1req, Z = 17.3)26, and carbon monoxide dehydrogenase corrinoid/iron-sulfur protein (Z = 16.0) (CoFeSP, PDB identifier 2h9a, Z = 16.0)27. MCM (Fig. 5c) displays nonequivalent (βα)8 barrels only one of which contains an active site. Fused to this domain is an AdoCbl binding domain that is positioned near the active site. CoFeSP (Fig. 5d), which utilizes methylcobalamin (MeCbl; 30) as a cosubstrate, also displays nonequivalent (βα)8 barrels with one active site. The MeCbl binding domain is fused to the noncatalytic domain and positioned near the active site of the catalytic domain. While there are structures of all domains of MetH, there is no intact structure that shows the relationship between the MeCbl binding domains and the (βα)8 barrel substrate-binding domains.
DISCUSSION
The bacterial HMP-P synthase catalyzes a remarkable rearrangement reaction of AIR to form the pyrimidine moiety of thiamin (Fig. 1b). Our initial attempts at reconstituting this reaction in a cell free extract from an E. coli HMP-P synthase overexpression strain yielded very low activity. However, this activity was sufficient to complete an in vitro labeling study that identified the origin of most of the atoms of HMP as well as the cofactor requirements of the reaction7. The reaction showed an absolute requirement for AIR and was enhanced by SAM, reduced nicotinamide (31) and by the addition of cell free extract from wild type E. coli.
Active enzyme was obtained by treating E. coli cell free extract containing C. crescentus HMP-P synthase with FeII and sulfide under anaerobic conditions followed by anaerobic purification by Ni-NTA chromatography. Similar preparations were obtained by overexpressing HMP-P synthase in an E. coli strain that also overexpressed the enzymes required for iron/sulfur cluster biosynthesis. Our efforts to reconstitute active HMP-P synthase were greatly facilitated by the availability of a highly sensitive assay using the other thiamin biosynthetic enzymes needed to convert minute amounts of biosynthesized HMP-P to the intensely fluorescent thiochrome phosphate (Supplementary Fig. 1b). The use of this assay to optimize the reconstitution resulted in a biochemically-defined HMP-P synthesizing system, requiring only AIR and SAM as the substrates, dithionite as the reducing agent and purified iron sulfur cluster containing HMP-P synthase. While the thiochrome assay does not identify the phosphorylation state of the pyrimidine as the phosphate is lost during thiamin phosphate formation, the optimized reconstitution yielded sufficient product for direct HPLC analysis. In this way, the products of the reaction were identified as HMP-P and 5-dAdo. Currently, this system is not catalytic and the observed yield of HMP-P production is ~10% (chemical reconstitution) or ~50% (in vivo reconstitution) with respect to the enzyme added. Incorporation of excess AIR or SAM did not result in any further enhancement of the product yield. However this reconstitution of active, purified HMP-P synthase is a major advance. It has enabled us to experimentally demonstrate that HMP-P synthase is a radical SAM enzyme, to characterize the [4Fe-4S] cluster using Mössbauer and EPR spectroscopies and opens up the system for detailed mechanistic characterization.
The large radical SAM superfamily was established on the basis of a common CX3CX2C sequence using bioinformatics12. The conserved cysteine residues are usually located near the N-terminus of the protein, but are occasionally found near the middle; however, the [4Fe-4S] cluster and SAM are in the same place in the known structures. HMP-P synthase was not originally included in this superfamily. The observation of a different conserved cysteine pattern near the C-terminus and the prediction that these residues form a separate swapped SAM binding domain, together with the reconstitution of the [4Fe-4S] cluster and the observation of 5′-deoxyadenosine as a product, demonstrate that HMP-P synthase is a novel member of the superfamily.
Sequence alignments of HMP-P synthase orthologs reveal that HMP-P synthases from anaerobes are shorter than from aerobes, lacking up to 130 residues in the N-terminus and 30 residues in the C-terminus. The (βα)8 core domain appears to be highly conserved, and the three cysteine residues near the C-terminus are absolutely conserved (Supplementary Fig. 6a). In anaerobic organisms the [4Fe-4S] binding loop is followed by only about 20 residues, while in aerobic organisms there are about 50 residues. Likewise, the N-terminal domains, which fold over the bottom (N-terminal end) and side of the (βα)8 barrel, contain only about 70 residues for anaerobes and about 210 residues for aerobes suggesting that the extra residues provide protection for the oxygen sensitive iron-sulfur cluster13.
The AdoCbl radical enzyme superfamily and radical SAM superfamily are functionally related, both using a 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical for carrying out molecular rearrangements, suggesting the possibility of an evolutionary relationship28. Structural evidence for an evolutionary relationship was provided by the observation that both superfamilies utilize (βα)8 barrels29. The prediction of a separate SAM-binding domain for HMP-P synthase and a common tandem (βα)8 barrel interface provides further structural evidence for such a link between these two superfamilies (Fig. 5). This might have occurred through a common ancestor with separate cofactor and catalytic subunits in which a SAM-binding domain and a AdoCbl-binding domain could exchange followed by gene fusions that eventually committed an enzyme to one or the other of the cofactors.
The structural and biochemical studies described here demonstrate that the bacterial HMP-P synthase is a radical SAM enzyme. In these enzymes, a reduced [4Fe-4S] cluster reduces SAM to give the adenosyl radical. This radical then participates in the isomerization of AIR to HMP-P. The production of 5-dAdo as a product of the reaction suggests that the hydrogen atom abstracted by 5-dAdo is not returned to the product. Aside from the results of the labeling experiments shown in Fig. 1b, we do not yet know the mechanism of this novel rearrangement reaction. Because of the large number of possibilities, we will refrain from proposing a mechanism until the catalytic competence of the protein-bound radical has been established, the site of initial hydrogen atom abstraction has been identified and the fates of the ribose C1′and C3′carbon atoms, both of which are absent in HMP-P, have been determined.
METHODS
Expression and purification of C. crescentus HMP-P synthase
The gene coding for HMP-P synthase was amplified by PCR from C. crescentus genomic DNA and cloned into the expression vector pDESTF1 (Invitrogen). The plasmid was transformed into the E. coli Rosetta (DE3) expression strain (Novagen), which contained a second plasmid to supplement the argU, argW, glyT, IleX, leuW, metT, proL, thrT, thrU, and tyrU tRNAs. Expression of HMP-P synthase was induced at OD600 = 0.6–0.8 with 0.5 mM isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (32) and incubation was continued overnight at 298 K. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 10 min and kept at −80 °C. Purification of the selenomethionine (SeMet, 33)-substituted protein is described in the Supplementary Methods.
Purification of Fe-S cluster reconstituted HMP-P synthase
3.5 mL of the filtered clarified lysate on ice was transferred into the glove box for reconstitution of the Fe-S cluster under strictly anaerobic conditions. Freshly prepared 500 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) stock solution was added to obtain a final concentration of 10 mM. Ferrous ammonium sulfate (34) was added to a final concentration of 10 mM in small aliquots, ensuring thorough mixing. Sodium sulfide was then added to the same final concentration in a similar fashion. The mixture was allowed to incubate on ice for 30 minutes and then 3 mL of this solution, dark in color, was loaded onto a Bio-Rad 10 DG desalting column, pre-equilibrated with 200 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.6, containing 4 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM DTT. Later, it was further subjected to Ni-NTA affinity purification as described in the Supplementary Methods.
HMP-P biosynthesis reconstitution assay
Assays were set up in a glovebox under strictly anaerobic conditions. A typical assay mixture contained 800 μM SAM, 400 μM AIR, 10 mM dithionite and 200 uL of protein (purified or in cell free extract). The enzyme concentration varied between 0.8–1.2 mM among preparations for purified HMP-P synthase. Total protein concentration in cell free extract varied between 35–40 mg mL−1. Products were detected directly or with a thiochrome assay as described in the Supplementary Methods.
Mössbauer and EPR spectroscopies
Mössbauer spectra were recorded on a spectrometer from WEB research (Edina, MN) operating in the constant acceleration mode in a transmission geometry. Spectra were recorded with the temperature of the sample maintained at 4.2 K in an externally applied magnetic field of 53 mT oriented parallel to the γ-beam. The quoted isomer shifts are relative to the centroid of the spectrum of a foil of α-Fe metal at room temperature. Data analysis was performed using the program WMOSS from WEB research.
Low-temperature X-band EPR spectra were recorded in perpendicular mode on a Bruker (Billerica, MA) Elexsys E-560 instrument. Sample temperature was maintained with an ITC503S temperature controller and an ESR900 liquid helium cryostat, both from Oxford Instruments (Concord, MA). Samples, which contained 500 μM HMP-P synthase in a total volume of 500 μL were loaded into EPR tubes and frozen in liquid N2 inside of a Coy (Grass Lake, MI) anaerobic chamber.
Crystallization of HMP-P synthase
The SeMet HMP-P synthase/HMP crystals were grown using the sitting drop vapor diffusion method at 298 K by mixing 5.0 μL of the protein solution (~10 mg mL−1) with 4.0 μL of a well solution (30% PEG4000, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.2, 200 mM Li2SO4, 2.0 mM DTT) and 1.0 μL of 100 mM HMP. Plate crystals appeared within three days and took one to two weeks to reach their maximum size of 0.05 mm × 0.1 mm × 0.01 mm. The crystals were monoclinic, space group P21, with unit cell dimension a = 63.3 Å, b = 103.4 Å, c = 95.4 Å and β= 91.6°. Assuming two HMP-P synthase molecules of 68 kDa in the asymmetric unit, the Matthews coefficient VM is 2.29 Å3 Da−1, corresponding to a solvent content of 46.4%30. For cryoprotection, the crystals were transferred to a cryoprotectant containing 30% PEG4000, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.2, 200 mM Li2SO4, 2.0 mM DTT, and 15% glycerol, immediately frozen in the cryostream, and stored under liquid nitrogen prior to data collection. Crystallization of the additional complexes is described in the Supplementary Methods.
X-ray data collection and processing
All of the HMP-P synthase X-ray diffraction data were collected at the Northeastern Collaborative Access Team (NE-CAT) beamline 24-ID-C of the Advanced Photon Source (APS) at a wavelength of 0.97918 Å. The data were integrated and scaled using HKL200031. Data collection details are described in the Supplementary Methods. The data collection statistics are summarized in Supplementary Table 1.
Structure determination and refinement
The crystal structure of HMP-P synthase from C. crescentus was solved by single wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) methods at 2.8 Å resolution using SeMet-substituted HMP-P/HMP crystal. Se sites were using ShelxD32,33, and were refined with MLPHARE34. RESOLVE35 was used for initial model building and the model was completed using O36, and Coot37. Structure refinement was performed using CNS38. The model quality was assessed at intervals with PROCHECK39. The structures of the complexes were refined at 2.0 Å resolution. Additional details are provided in the Supplementary Methods. For the HMP-P synthase structures, 84.8% to 88.9% of the non-glycine residues are in the most favored region of the Ramachandran plot, with no residue in the disallowed region. The final refinement statistics are shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Structural Analysis
Structure-based sequence alignments were done either using the protein structure comparison server SSM40 at the European Bioformatics Institute or using the program LSQKAB41 of the CCP4 suite. The sequence alignment figure was prepared with ESPRIPT42. The Protein-Protein Interaction Server43,44 was used to analyze protein-protein interfaces for accessible surface area, hydrogen bonds, and salt bridges. Figures were prepared with PyMOL45 and CCP4mg46.
Synthesis of IMR (23)
The chemical synthesis of IMR is outlined in (Supplementary Fig. 7c) and described in the Supplementary Methods.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank NE-CAT beam line 24-ID-C, supported by National Institutes of Health Grant RR15301, for the use of beamtime. We thank C. Kinsland for the preparation of the HMP-P synthase overexpression plasmid and L. Kinsland for assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health grants DK44083 (T.P.B.), GM63847 (S.J.B.) and DK67081 (S.E.E), the Beckman Foundation (Young Investigator Award to C.K.), and the Dreyfus Foundation (Camille Dreyfus Teacher Scholar Award to C.K.). S.E.E. is indebted to the W. M. Keck Foundation and the Lucille P. Markey Charitable Trust.
Footnotes
COMPETING INTERESTS STATEMENT
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Accession codes
Protein Data Bank: The coordinates for HMP-P synthase/HMP, HMP-P synthase/HMP-P and HMP-P synthase/IMR have been newly deposited under the accession codes 3EPM, 3EPO, and 3EPN, respectively.
References
- 1.Begley TP, et al. Thiamin biosynthesis in prokaryotes. Arch Microbiol. 1999;171:293–300. doi: 10.1007/s002030050713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Settembre E, Begley TP, Ealick SE. Structural biology of enzymes of the thiamin biosynthesis pathway. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2003;13:739–747. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2003.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chatterjee A, Jurgenson CT, Schroeder FC, Ealick SE, Begley TP. Thiamin Biosynthesis in Eukaryotes: Characterization of the Enzyme-Bound Product of Thiazole Synthase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Its Implications in Thiazole Biosynthesis. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:7158–7159. doi: 10.1021/ja061413o. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chatterjee A, Jurgenson CT, Schroeder FC, Ealick SE, Begley TP. Biosynthesis of Thiamin Thiazole in Eukaryotes: Conversion of NAD to an Advanced Intermediate. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:2914–2922. doi: 10.1021/ja067606t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jurgenson CT, Chatterjee A, Begley TP, Ealick SE. Structural Insights into the Function of the Thiamin Biosynthetic Enzyme Thi4 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry. 2006;45:11061–11070. doi: 10.1021/bi061025z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kriek M, et al. Thiazole Synthase from Escherichia coli: An investigation of the substates and purified proteins required for activity in vitro. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:17413–17423. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700782200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lawhorn BG, Mehl RA, Begley TP. Biosynthesis of the thiamin pyrimidine: the reconstitution of a remarkable rearrangement reaction. Org Biomol Chem. 2004;2:2538–2546. doi: 10.1039/B405429F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Newell PC, Tucker RG. Biosynthesis of the pyrimidine moiety of thiamine. A new route of pyrimidine biosynthesis involving purine intermediates. Biochem J. 1968;106:279–287. doi: 10.1042/bj1060279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zeidler J, Sayer BG, Spenser ID. Biosynthesis of vitamin B1 in yeast. Derivation of the pyrimidine unit from pyridoxine and histidine Intermediacy of urocanic acid. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:13094–13105. doi: 10.1021/ja030261j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Frey PA, Booker SJ. Radical mechanisms of S-adenosylmethionine-dependent enzymes. Adv Protein Chem. 2001;58:1–45. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(01)58001-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang SC, Frey PA. S-adenosylmethionine as an oxidant: the radical SAM superfamily. Trends Biochem Sci. 2007;32:101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2007.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sofia HJ, Chen G, Hetzler BG, Reyes-Spindola JF, Miller NE. Radical SAM, a novel protein superfamily linking unresolved steps in familiar biosynthetic pathways with radical mechanisms: functional characterization using new analysis and information visualization methods. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:1097–1106. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.5.1097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dougherty MJ, Downs DM. A connection between iron-sulfur cluster metabolism and the biosynthesis of 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine pyrophosphate in Salmonella enterica. Microbiology. 2006;152:2345–2353. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.28926-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Raschke M, et al. Vitamin B1 biosynthesis in plants requires the essential iron sulfur cluster protein, THIC. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:19637–19642. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0709597104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Reddick JJ, Nicewonger R, Begley TP. Mechanistic Studies on Thiamin Phosphate Synthase: Evidence for a Dissociative Mechanism. Biochemistry. 2001;40:10095–10102. doi: 10.1021/bi010267q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Park JH, Burns K, Kinsland C, Begley TP. Characterization of two kinases involved in thiamine pyrophosphate and pyridoxal phosphate biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis: 4-amino-5-hydroxymethyl-2-methylpyrimidine kinase and pyridoxal kinase. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:1571–1573. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.5.1571-1573.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cicchillo RM, et al. Escherichia coli lipoyl synthase binds two distinct [4Fe-4S] clusters per polypeptide. Biochemistry. 2004;43:11770–11781. doi: 10.1021/bi0488505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Munck E. Aspects of 57Fe Mossbauer spectroscopy. Phys Methods Bioinorg Chem. 2000:287–319. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Vallazza M, et al. First look at RNA in L-configuration. Acta Crystallogr D. 2004;60:1–7. doi: 10.1107/s0907444903027690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Layer G, Moser J, Heinz DW, Jahn D, Schubert WD. Crystal structure of coproporphyrinogen III oxidase reveals cofactor geometry of Radical SAM enzymes. EMBO J. 2003;22:6214–6224. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hanzelmann P, Schindelin H. Crystal structure of the S-adenosylmethionine-dependent enzyme MoaA and its implications for molybdenum cofactor deficiency in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:12870–12875. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404624101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lepore BW, Ruzicka FJ, Frey PA, Ringe D. The x-ray crystal structure of lysine-2,3-aminomutase from Clostridium subterminale. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:13819–13824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505726102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Reitzer R, et al. Glutamate mutase from Clostridium cochlearium: the structure of a coenzyme B12-dependent enzyme provides new mechanistic insights. Structure. 1999;7:891–902. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(99)80116-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Berkovitch F, et al. A locking mechanism preventing radical damage in the absence of substrate, as revealed by the x-ray structure of lysine 5,6-aminomutase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:15870–15875. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407074101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Evans JC, et al. Structures of the N-terminal modules imply large domain motions during catalysis by methionine synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:3729–3736. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308082100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mancia F, et al. How coenzyme B12 radicals are generated: the crystal structure of methylmalonyl-coenzyme A mutase at 2 Å resolution. Structure. 1996;4:339–350. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(96)00037-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Svetlitchnaia T, Svetlitchnyi V, Meyer O, Dobbek H. Structural insights into methyltransfer reactions of a corrinoid iron-sulfur protein involved in acetyl-CoA synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:14331–14336. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601420103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Frey PA. Radical mechanisms of enzymatic catalysis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2001;70:121–148. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Berkovitch F, Nicolet Y, Wan JT, Jarrett JT, Drennan CL. Crystal structure of biotin synthase, an S-adenosylmethionine-dependent radical enzyme. Science. 2004;303:76–79. doi: 10.1126/science.1088493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Matthews BW. Solvent content of protein crystals. J Mol Biol. 1968;33:491–497. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(68)90205-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of x-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:307–326. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schneider TR, Sheldrick GM. Substructure solution with SHELXD. Acta Crystallogr D. 2002;58:1772–1779. doi: 10.1107/s0907444902011678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Uson I, Sheldrick GM. Advances in direct methods for protein crystallography. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1999;9:643–648. doi: 10.1016/s0959-440x(99)00020-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Otwinowski Z. Daresbury study weekend proceedings. 1991 [Google Scholar]
- 35.Terwilliger TC. Maximum-likelihood density modification. Acta Crystallogr D. 2000;56:965–972. doi: 10.1107/S0907444900005072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jones TA, Zou JY, Cowan SW, Kjeldgaard M. Improved methods for the building of protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr A. 1991;47:110–119. doi: 10.1107/s0108767390010224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Emsley P, Cowtan K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D. 2004;60:2126–2132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Brünger AT, et al. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr D. 1998;54:905–921. doi: 10.1107/s0907444998003254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Laskowski RA, Moss DS, Thornton JM. Main-chain bond lengths and bond angles in protein structures. J Mol Biol. 1993;231:1049–1067. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Krissinel E, Henrick K. Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr D. 2004;60:2256–2268. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904026460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kabsch W, Kabsch H, Eisenberg D. Packing in a new crystalline form of glutamine synthetase from Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1976;100:283–291. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(76)80064-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gouet P, Courcelle E, Stuart DI, Metoz F. ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript. Bioinformatics. 1999;15:305–308. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.4.305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jones S, Thornton JM. Protein-protein interactions: a review of protein dimer structures. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1995;63:31–65. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(94)00008-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jones S, Thornton JM. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:13–20. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.1.13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.DeLano WL. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. 2002 [Google Scholar]
- 46.Potterton E, McNicholas S, Krissinel E, Cowtan K, Noble M. The CCP4 molecular-graphics project. Acta Crystallogr D. 2002;58:1955–1957. doi: 10.1107/s0907444902015391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





