Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2008 Dec 4;3(12):e3846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003846

β-Lactam Effects on Mixed Cultures of Common Respiratory Isolates as an Approach to Treatment Effects on Nasopharyngeal Bacterial Population Dynamics

David Sevillano 1, Lorenzo Aguilar 1,*, Luis Alou 1, María-José Giménez 1, Natalia González 1, Martha Torrico 1, Fabio Cafini 1, Pilar Coronel 2, José Prieto 1
Editor: Keertan Dheda3
PMCID: PMC2587697  PMID: 19052648

Abstract

Background

Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes and Haemophilus influenzae are bacteria present in the nasopharynx as part of normal flora. The ecological equilibrium in the nasopharynx can be disrupted by the presence of antibiotics.

Methodology/Principal Findings

A computerized two-compartment pharmacodynamic model was used to explore β-lactam effects on the evolution over time of a bacterial load containing common pharyngeal isolates by simulating free serum concentrations obtained with amoxicillin (AMX) 875 mg tid, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC) 875/125 mg tid and cefditoren (CDN) 400 mg bid regimens over 24 h. Strains and MICs (µg/ml) of AMX, AMC and CDN were: S. pyogenes (0.03, 0.03 and 0.015), S. pneumoniae (2, 2 and 0.25), a β-lactamase positive H. influenzae (BL+; >16, 2 and 0.06) and a β-lactamase positive AMC-resistant H. influenzae (BLPACR, >16, 8 and 0.06). Mixture of identical 1∶1∶1∶1 volumes of each bacterial suspension were prepared yielding an inocula of ≈4×106 cfu/ml. Antibiotic concentrations were measured both in bacterial and in bacteria-free antibiotic simulations. β-lactamase production decreased AMX concentrations and fT>MIC against S. pneumoniae (from 43.2% to 17.7%) or S. pyogenes (from 99.9% to 24.9%), and eradication was precluded. The presence of clavulanic acid countered this effect of co-pathogenicity, and S. pyogenes (but not BL+ and S. pneumoniae) was eradicated. Resistance of CDN to TEM β-lactamase avoided this co-pathogenicity effect, and CDN eradicated S. pyogenes and H. influenzae strains (fT>MIC >58%), and reduced in 94% S. pneumoniae counts (fT>MIC ≈25%).

Conclusions/Significance

Co-pathogenicity seems to be gradual since clavulanic acid countered this effect for strains very susceptible to AMX as S. pyogenes but not for strains with AMX MIC values in the limit of susceptibility as S. pneumoniae. There is a potential therapeutic advantage for β-lactamase resistant cephalosporins with high activity against streptococci.

Introduction

Carriage of common respiratory isolates as Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes depends on multiple factors such as active or passive smoking, crowding or age [1], strain fitness properties [2], specific vaccination [3], and bacterial interference in antibiotic-free niches. H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae are recovered exclusively from humans and find their ecological niche in colonizing nasopharynx. Up to 80% of healthy persons carry H. influenzae [4], with multiple strains in 50% positive samples [5]. In the case of S. pneumoniae, carriage ranges from 10% to 40% in an age dependent manner [6], with a lower percentage of multiple strains in the same sample [7]. While higher turnover of strains is found in H. influenzae [2], duration of nasopharyngeal carriage of penicillin-resistant streptococci (PRSP) depends on age, seasonality, carriage of PRSP by other family members [8], and serotype, with higher transmission for 6A and 14 [9]. The carriage of strains resistant to β-lactams is a source of concern in some countries as Spain where penicillin non-susceptibility in S. pneumoniae reaches 44% isolates in the community [10], and ampicillin resistance in H. influenzae attains 25%, with 80% of these isolates being resistant due to β-lactamase production and 20% due to the BLNAR (β-lactamase negative ampicillin-resistant) phenotype [10] caused by mutations in the ftsI gene [11]. Strains exhibiting both resistant genotypes (TEM- β-lactamase and mutation in the ftsI gene) constitute the BLPACR (β-lactamase positive amoxicillin/clavulanate-resistant) phenotype and have been recently reported as cause of concern [11].

No problems of resistance to β-lactams are found in S. pyogenes, an ubiquitous microorganism that frequently colonizes throats of asymptomatic persons, with carriage rates of 15–20% in infants [12], [13] and of 10% in adult smokers [1].

Mucosal surfaces may be simultaneously colonized by multiple species, and there is an intrincate balance in the oropharynx between S. pyogenes, H. influenzae, S. pneumoniae and other oropharyngeal flora [14]. It has been suggested that this oropharyngeal flora is altered in S. pyogenes carriers with a decrease in other streptococcal species (alpha-hemolytic streptococci) with interfering capabilities [14], [15]. On the other side the success of an organism in colonizing, and maybe in establishing a subsequent infection, might be determined by its ability to compete with co-habitants of its niche, since replication/survival of biological organisms serves to gain space and time [16], and to gain space is dominance (versus other populations) and to gain time is success [16]. Dynamics of different bacterial populations in antibiotic-free niches are the baseline that antibiotic treatments can alter [17], [18].

In this study we explored the effect of physiological concentrations of three β-lactams (amoxicillin, amoxicillin plus a β-lactamase inhibitor, and a third generation oral cephalosporin resistant to TEM β-lactamases) on the evolution over time of a bacterial load containing a beta-hemolytic streptococci (S. pyogenes), an alpha-hemolytic streptococci (a serotype 14 penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae), and two β-lactamase positive H. influenzae strains (one characterized as BLPACR) in the same niche.

Materials and Methods

Strains

Four clinical isolates were used throughout the study: one S. pyogenes, one serotype 14 penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae, one β-lactamase TEM-1 producing H. influenzae (BL+), and one H. influenzae TEM-1 positive strain presenting a N526K mutation in the ftsI gene (BLPACR). BL+ was trimethoprim resistant (MIC >128 µg/ml) and the BLPACR strain was trimethoprim susceptible (0.12 µg/ml); this difference was used throughout the study to differentiate both strains. Mutations in the ftsI and TEM-1 genes were determined by PCR amplification and direct sequencing [19], [20].

Culture media and preliminary studies

Different broth media were used in preliminary studies to determine which media showed the best growth rate over 24 h for all strains: a) Mueller-Hinton broth (Difco laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) supplemented with 5% lysed sheep blood (Biomedics, Madrid, Spain) (MHB) (as media recommended for streptococci) [21], b) Mueller-Hinton broth supplemented with 15 µg/ml nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, 15 µg/ml haemin (Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co., St. Louis, USA), and 5 µg/ml of yeast extract (Difco laboratories) (HTM) (as media recommended for H. influenzae) [21], c) Todd-Hewitt broth supplemented with 5 µg/ml of yeast extract, and d) Todd-Hewitt broth (Difco laboratories) supplemented with 15 µg/ml nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, 15 µg/ml haemin and 5 µg/ml of yeast extract (THSB). THSB showed the best growth rate for all strains (data not shown) and was the selected broth medium for pharmacodynamic simulations.

In vitro susceptibility

MICs of cefditoren, amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid were determined by the microdilution method following NCCLS/CLSI recommendations [21], and also using THSB as media (broth media used in pharmacodynamic simulations). MICs were determined in triplicate and the modal value of each determination was considered.

In vitro kinetic model ( Figure 1 )

Figure 1. Pharmacodynamic computerized device.

Figure 1

Diagram of the in vitro two-compartment computerized device used in the study.

A previously described two-compartment dynamic model was used to expose bacteria to changing study drug concentrations avoiding the dilution of the bacterial inoculum together with the drug [17], [18]. The extra-capillary space and the intra-dialyser circulating tubing of the second compartment (FX50 helixone dialyzer, Fresenius Medical Care S.A., Barcelona, Spain), represented the colonisation site. The central compartment, representing the systemic circulation, consisted of a spinner flask with THSB, tubing and lumina of capillaries within a dialyser unit. The exponential decay of concentrations was obtained by a continuous dilution-elimination process using computerized peristaltic pumps (Masterflex, Cole-Parmer Instrument Co., Chicago, IL, USA) set to simulate half-lives of amoxicillin, clavulanic acid and cefditoren. In control drug-free simulations the rate of peristaltic pumps was fixed to 0.67 ml/min. Additional pumps circulated the antimicrobial-medium mixture at 50 ml/min rate between the central and peripheral compartments, and at 25 ml/min within the extra-capillary space through external tubing. A computer-controlled syringe pump (402 Dilutor Dispenser; Gilson S.A, Villiers-le-Bel, France) allowed the simulation of drug concentrations by infusion of the drug into the central compartment until the maximum concentration achieved in serum (Cmax) was reached. Both compartments were maintained at 37°C all over the simulation process.

Preparation of individual and mixed cultures

The strains were grown overnight on Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco laboratories) supplemented with 5% lysed sheep blood (Biomedics) (MHA) in the case of S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes, or on GC agar (Difco laboratories) supplemented with 5% sheep blood (added at 50°C) and VX growth factors (GCSA) in the case of H. influenzae. Several colonies of each strain were suspended in THSB to obtain a bacterial density of approx. 1×108 cfu/ml. A 1∶100 dilution was prepared to obtain an initial inoculum of approx. 1×106 cfu/ml. For the mixed inoculum, a mixture of identical 1∶1∶1∶1 volumes of each bacterial suspension was prepared, yielding an inoculum of approx. 4×106 cfu/ml.

Experiments

Sixty ml of each individual or of the mixed inoculum were introduced into the peripheral compartment of the in vitro model and pre-incubated 1 h. Experiments performed were:

  1. Antibiotic-free simulations using each individual inoculum (individual growth control)

  2. Antibiotic-free simulations using the mixed inoculum (mixed growth control)

  3. Bacteria-free simulations with each antibiotic to set the pharmacokinetic profile of each study drug

  4. Simulations with each antibiotic using the mixed inoculum

In each experiment, samples (0.5 ml) from the peripheral compartment were collected at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 h. Each sample was serially ten-fold diluted in 0.9% sodium chloride, and 20 µl plated for bacterial counting onto plates containing different media to allow species/strains differentiation: a) MHA: growth of S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes that were differentiated by their different hemolytical properties (beta for S. pyogenes and alpha for S. pneumoniae), b) GCSA: growth of both H. influenzae strains that were differentiated from the other species by their morphological properties, c) GCSA containing 4 µg/ml of trimethoprim: growth of BL+, not allowing the growth of the BLPACR strain. Colony counts of the BLPACR strain were calculated by the difference in colony counts between both GCSA plates. The total population was established as the accumulated colony counting of S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes on MHA and H. influenzae on GCSA medium. All plates were incubated at 37°C 5% CO2 for 24 h. The limit of detection was 50 cfu/ml. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Kinetic simulations

Free-drug concentrations after oral amoxicillin 875 mg three-times daily, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 875/125 mg three-times daily and cefditoren-pivoxil 400 mg twice daily administration, were simulated over 24 h using the reported protein binding of 18% for amoxicillin [22], 25% for clavulanic acid [22], and 88% for cefditoren [23]. The target total pharmacokinetic parameters were: Cmax = 11.6 µg/ml and t1/2 = 1.15 h for amoxicillin [22], Cmax = 2.20 µg/ml and t1/2 = 1.15 h for clavulanic acid [22], and Cmax = 4.5 µg/ml and t1/2 = 1.55 h for cefditoren [23]. Target free concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Pharmacokinetics.

Cefditoren 400 mg Clavulanic acid 125 mg Amoxicillin 875 mg
AMX simulations AMC simulations
Time (h) Target SBF SMI Target SBF SMI Target SBF SMI SBF SMI
Tmaxa 0.50 0.52±0.02 0.52±0.03 1.65 1.70±0.09 1.46±0.11 9.51 9.05±0.19 5.11±1.27b 9.17±0.24 9.24±0.71
2 - 0.36±0.00 0.40±0.04 1.22 1.15±0.13 1.07±0.21 7.03 6.30±0.51 2.43±1.49b 6.12±0.09 6.04±0.91
4 0.29 0.28±0.04 0.30±0.02 0.36 0.21±0.03 0.21±0.03 2.11 1.74±0.00 UDLb 1.50±0.17 0.59±0.39b
6 0.12 0.12±0.01 0.10±0.03 0.11 0.13±0.00 0.11±0.00 0.63 0.45±0.03 UDLb 0.41±0.05 0.06±0.02b
8 0.04 0.04±0.00 0.05±0.01 0.03 UDL UDL 0.19 0.13±0.03 UDLb 0.17±0.02 0.04±0.01b
10 0.02 0.02±0.00 0.01±0.01 - - - - - - - -
12 0.01 0.01±0.00 0.01±0.00 - - - - - - - -
Cmaxc 0.50 0.52±0.02 0.52±0.03 1.65 1.70±0.09 1.46±0.10 9.51 9.06±0.19 5.11±1.27b 9.17±0.24 9.24±0.71
AUCd 1.79 1.76±0.05 1.79±0.10 3.91 3.26±0.09 2.86±0.40 22.59 20.13±0.52 5.61±1.71b 19.76±0.91 15.90±1.59
t1/2 (h) 1.55 1.49±0.06 1.48±0.07 1.15 0.99±0.31 1.03±0.17 1.15 1.08±0.09 0.40±0.06b 1.16±0.03 0.80±0.03 b

Free concentrations (in beta-phase over the dosing interval) and pharmacokinetic parameters: target values and values determined in bacteria-free simulations (SBF) and in simulations with the mixed inocula (SMI).

a

Tmax: 2.8 h for cefditoren, 1.5 h for clavulanic acid and amoxicillin.

b

p<0.01 versus SBF.

c

µg/ml.

d

mg×h/L.

UDL = under detection limit.

Pharmacokinetic analysis

For the measurement of simulated antimicrobial concentrations, aliquots (0.5 ml) were taken at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h and at the time corresponding to Tmax, and stored at −50°C. To study the influence of bacteria on the pharmacokinetic profile, samples for measuring antibiotic concentrations were taken both in bacteria-free antibiotic simulations (carried out to set the model) and in experimental simulations with bacteria and antibiotic. Concentrations were determined by bioassay using Morganella morganii ATCC 8076H as indicator organism for cefditoren [24] (linear concentrations from 0.0035 to 4 µg/ml; limit of detection = 0.0035 µg/ml), Micrococcus luteus ATCC 9341 for amoxicillin (linear concentrations from 0.03 to 1 µg/ml; limit of detection = 0.06 µg/ml), and Klebsiella pneumoniae NCTC 11228 for clavulanic acid concentrations [25] (linear concentrations from 0.06 to 4 µg/ml; limit of detection = 0.12 µg/ml). Plates were inoculated with an even lawn of the indicator organism and incubated for 18–24 h at 37°C. Intra- and inter-day coefficients of variation were 2.54% and 2.25% for amoxicillin, 3.68% and 2.02% for clavulanic acid, and 1.97% and 1.97% for cefditoren, respectively, for an internal control concentration of 0.75 µg/ml.

Antimicrobial concentrations were analysed by a non-compartmental approach using WinNonlin 5.2 Professional program (Pharsight, Mountainview, CA, USA). Cmax and Tmax were obtained directly from observed data and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated by the trapezoidal rule. The percentage of the dosing interval that the unbound fraction of drug concentrations exceed the MIC, fT>MIC, was calculated by a non-comportmental approach for pharmacodynamic data using the model 220 of WinNonlin program.

Measurement of β-lactamase activity

β-lactamase activity was measured in antibiotic simulations with the mixed inocula at 0, Tmax, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 h using a modification of a previously described method [26], [27]. In brief, 0.025 ml of a 500 µg/ml solution of Nitrocefin were added to 225 µl of samples collected at sampling times for colony counting, and incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Afterwards, 0.75 ml of phosphate buffer 0.05 M was added and absorbance at 486 nm (A486) was spectrophotometrically read, using broth without inoculum as baseline absorbance.

Statistical analysis

Unpaired t test or one-way ANOVA with Tukey post test was used to compare the concentrations measured and the pharmacokinetic parameters calculated in bacteria-free simulations vs. simulations with the mixed inocula for each study drug, and of β-lactamase production between simulations with the different study drugs. A p≤0.01 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Pharmacokinetics

Table 1 shows concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters experimentally measured in the peripheral compartment in bacteria-free simulations and in those simulations performed with the mixed inocula. For cefditoren and clavulanic acid, no significant differences were found between target free concentrations, those determined in bacteria-free simulations and those in mixed inocula simulations. In contrast, for amoxicillin significant differences were found between concentrations determined in simulations carried out with the mixed inocula and those measured in bacteria-free simulations. In amoxicillin simulations (where amoxicillin was not protected by clavulanic acid) significant lower concentrations of amoxicillin were found in simulations carried out with the mixed inocula from Tmax to 8 h (end of the dosing interval), with non-detectable amoxicillin concentrations from 4 h on. This resulted in a significant decrease in amoxicillin pharmacokinetic parameters calculated with amoxicillin concentrations measured in simulations carried out with the mixed inocula (with its β-lactamase production) vs. those calculated with concentrations measured in bacteria-free simulations: Cmax decreased from 9.06 to 5.11 µg/ml, AUC from 20.13 to 5.61 µg/ml×h, and t1/2 from 1.08 to 0.40 h. In amoxicillin/clavulanic acid simulations, regardless the presence of clavulanic acid, significant lower concentrations of amoxicillin were found in simulations carried out with the mixed inocula from 4 to 8 h, although differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were not significant except for the half-life value (1.16 vs. 0.80 h).

In vitro susceptibility

Table 2 shows in vitro susceptibility (MICs determined following CLSI recommendations) of study strains to the antibiotics used in this study. MICs determined in THSB (the broth media used in the simulations) exhibited equal values to those determined in the media recommended by CLSI, except for the BLPACR strain and cefditoren, and the BL+ strain and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid where MICs in THSB showed one-dilution lower values. S. pyogenes was susceptible to all antibiotics with MICs ≤0.03 µg/ml. S. pneumoniae was susceptible to amoxicillin with or without clavulanic acid (MIC = 2 µg/ml), and although there are not established CLSI breakpoints for cefditoren, the strain would be classified as intermediate resistant (MIC = 0.25 µg/ml) following the FDA proposed breakpoints [23]. Both H. influenzae strains were inhibited by cefditoren concentrations of 0.06 µg/ml, were resistant to amoxicillin, and the BLPACR strain was also resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid according to CLSI breakpoints [28].

Table 2. Pharmacodynamics.

Cefditoren Amoxicillin Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid
MIC T>MIC MIC T>MIC MIC T>MICa
SBF SMI SBF SMI SBF SMI
S. pyogenes 0.015 84.3 79.0 0.03 99.9 24.9 0.03 99.9 99.9
S. pneumoniae 0.25 24.0 25.6 2 43.2 17.7 2 40.8 32.8
H. influenzae BL+ 0.06 57.4 58.0 >16 0.0 0.0 2 40.8 32.8
H. influenzae BLPACR 0.06 57.4 58.0 >16 0.0 0.0 8 4.5 4.6

In vitro susceptibility (MIC; µg/ml) of the strains used in the study, and T>MIC (% dosing interval) in bacteria-free simulations (SBF) and in simulations with the mixed inocula (SMI) for bid 400 mg cefditoren, tid 875 mg amoxicillin, and tid 875/125 mg amoxicillin/clavulanic acid regimens.

a

on amoxicillin basis.

Pharmacodynamics

Table 2 shows fT>MIC calculated both with concentrations determined in bacteria-free simulations and in those with the mixed inocula. Similar values were obtained in both cases for cefditoren with fT>MIC >55% for H. influenzae and S. pyogenes, and ≈25% for S. pneumoniae. In the case of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, negligible values of amoxicillin fT>MIC were obtained against the BLPACR strain, values for the BL+ and S. pneumoniae decreased from 40.8% to 32.8% when comparing bacteria-free vs. mixed inocula (with its β-lactamase production), and were nearly 100% of the dosing interval for S. pyogenes. Finally, in amoxicillin simulations, where clavulanic acid was not present to protect amoxicillin, negligible values were obtained for both β-lactamase producing strains, and fT>MIC decreased when comparing bacteria-free vs. mixed inocula simulations from 43.2% to 17.7% (S. pneumoniae) and from 99.9% to 24.9% (S. pyogenes) in the case of the gram-positive strains.

Fitness in antibiotic-free simulations

Viability in THSB over time in individual and mixed simulations without antibiotics is shown in Figure 2. In individual cultures mean colony counts increased from time 0 to 12 and 24 h in ≥1 log10 cfu/ml for all strains except S. pyogenes where similar colony counts were found at times 0, 12 and 24 h (≈6.05 log10 cfu/ml).

Figure 2. Evolution of inocula over time under experimental conditions.

Figure 2

Colony counts over 24 h in antibiotic-free individual simulations, antibiotic-free mixed simulations and in simulations with study drugs (grey: total population, blue: S. pneumoniae, green: S. pyogenes, orange: BL+, purple: BLPACR).

The situation was completely different in simulations with the mixed inocula. Mean log10 colony counts of the global mixed inocula were maintained over time (6.55 log10 at time 0, 6.37 log10 at 12 h and 6.10 log10 at 24 h), but the distribution of the bacterial population highly varied when considering the percentage of cfu/ml of each strain over 24 h. At time 0 each strain accounted for approx. 25% of the mixed inocula, and at 24 h up to 96.3% of the population corresponded to S. pyogenes, with small populations of the BLPACR strain (3.17%) and S. pneumoniae (0.50%), and colony counts below the detection limit for the BL+ strain.

Simulations with antibiotics and mixed inocula

A reduction of 98.5% (≈2 log10 cfu/ml) in the initial global mixed inocula at 24 h was obtained with cefditoren, but no reductions were obtained with amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.

The reduction provided by cefditoren was due to the disappearance of the S. pyogenes population at 6 h (fT>MIC 79%), of H. influenzae populations at 12 h (with fT>MIC 58%), and to 94% decrease in the initial S. pneumoniae population at 24 h (with fT>MIC ≈25%).

In amoxicillin/clavulanic acid simulations the maintained counts of BL+ (fT>MIC 32.8%), and the increase in 0.5 log10 of the BLPACR population (fT>MIC of only 4.6%) were responsible for the absence of reduction in the initial global mixed inocula. S. pneumoniae decreased 0.94 log10 (fT>MIC 32.8%) and S. pyogenes was not detectable from 10 h on (fT>MIC 99.9%).

In amoxicillin simulations, the maintenance or slight increase in H. influenzae strains (fT>MIC 0%) produced the absence of reductions in the initial global mixed inocula at 24 h. S. pneumoniae decreased only 0.49 log10 and this could be related to the decrease in fT>MIC from 43.2% in bacteria-free simulations to 17.7% in mixed inocula simulations due to β-lactamase production and amoxicillin inactivation as shown in Table 1 (significantly lower amoxicillin concentrations in mixed inocula vs. bacteria-free simulations). This inactivation also affected the activity against S. pyogenes, and the amoxicillin regimen was the only one that was not able to eradicate this strain (although producing 1.2 log10 reduction), due to the reduction in fT>MIC from 99.9% to 24.9% when comparing bacteria-free vs. mixed inocula simulations.

β-lactamase activity

Table 3 shows β-lactamase activity over 24 h in the simulations carried out with the study drugs. No differences were found between the three antibiotic regimens until 6 h when differences between amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid simulations were significant. At 10 and 12 h significant higher β-lactamase activity was found in amoxicillin than in amoxicillin/clavulanic acid simulations, and this could be related with the different population of the β-lactamase producing strains found in both simulations at these timepoints: approx. 7.5 log10 in amoxicillin and approx. 4–5 log10 in amoxicillin/clavulanic acid simulations. In cefditoren simulations, at 10 h and 12 h, the β-lactamase activity determined was similar to the one in amoxicillin simulations. Cefditoren was highly active against the two H. influenzae strains, and the lysis of these organisms (colony counts ≤100 colonies at these timepoints) probably produced release of the enzyme responsible for the high β-lactamase activity determined.

Table 3. β-lactamase activity.

Time Cefditoren Amoxicillin Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid
0 0.21±0.00 0.21±0.00 0.24±0.00
Tmax 0.11±0.10 0.06±0.03 0.02±0.03
2 0.06±0.07 0.09±0.05 0.00±0.00
4 0.18±0.13 0.17±0.03 0.05±0.00
6 0.21±0.08 0.36±0.11 0.10±0.00b
8 0.31±0.11 0.23±0.04 0.14±0.00
10 0.23±0.11 0.17±0.06 0.02±0.02c
12 0.24±0.05 0.30±0.02 0.01±0.01c
24 0.05±0.02d 0.19±0.06 0.20±0.01

β-lactamase activity (absorbance units) in simulations of bid 400 mg cefditoren, tid 875 mg amoxicillin, and tid 875/125 mg amoxicillin/clavulanic acid regimens.

a

Tmax: 2.8 h for cefditoren, 1.5 h for clavulanic acid and amoxicillin.

b

p<0.01 amoxicillin/clavulanic acid vs. amoxicillin.

c

p<0.01 amoxicillin/clavulanic acid vs. amoxicillin and cefditoren.

d

p<0.01 cefditoren vs. amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.

At 24 h significantly lower β-lactamase activity (0.05 absorbance units) was found in cefditoren simulations (H. influenzae colony counts below the limit of detection) vs. amoxicillin with or without clavulanic acid (0.20 absorbance units, a value similar to time 0) simulations where colony counts were higher than the initial inocula.

Discussion

Ecology and resistance in human microbiota are related phenomena since there is some evidence that bacterial fitness decreases, at least at short term, due to resistance [29]. In compartment models the fitness of a bacterial strain is directly proportional to its ability to compete with other strains and inversely proportional to its clearance [30]. If there is heterogeneity in fitness, those strains with higher fitness are anticipated or eventually prevailed [30]. Dynamics of the different subpopulations in an antibiotic-free environment are the baseline that antibiotic treatments can alter by interfering with bacterial fitness (including colonisation and transmission), since resistance can be associated with a decrease in fitness [31].

In this study we tried to simulate a nasopharyngeal niche by means of a mixed inocula of common respiratory isolates showing classical (β-lactamase production in H. influenzae and penicillin resistance in S. pneumoniae) and emergent but increasing (concomitant ftsI gene mutation in the BLPACR strain) resistance phenotypes. Despite up to 80% of healthy persons carry H. influenzae [4], with multiple strains in 50% positive samples [5] and although there is an increasing isolation rate of BLPACR [11], the use of strains with different resistance phenotypes may be a limitation of the study. However resistance was needed as a marker to show differences between the three antibiotics used with different behaviour (susceptibility, protection by an inhibitor or resistance) in the presence of β-lactamases. Another limitation of the study may be the exposition to antibiotics of mixed inocula with identical proportions of the different strains at time 0. In a pathological situation, the inoculum of S. pyogenes may be higher than that of the other microorganisms, as occurred in this study in antibiotic-free simulations: S. pyogenes was the dominant population at 24 h (accounting for 96.3%) together with a small population of β-lactamase producing H. influenzae strain (3.17%). β-lactamase producing bacteria are frequently found in patients with recurrent tonsillitis, where the exposure to antibiotics in general and to β-lactams in particular select them in nasopharyngeal flora [14]. This has lead to the concept of co-pathogenicity (protection of S. pyogenes susceptible to penicillin by colocalized bacteria resistant to penicillin due to β-lactamase production) [32][34]. Co-pathogenicity has been hypothesised by some authors to be responsible of penicillin treatment failures in the treatment of group A β-hemolytic streptococci pharyngitis due to β-lactamase producing organisms in the pharynx as H. influenzae or Moraxella catarrhalis [34], but criticised by others [35], [36] on the basis that if there is a clinical difference (that may be dubious) between penicillin and cephalosporins, the question of how important is this difference, together with cost issues, remains. On the other side, in addition to the clinical goal of antimicrobial therapy that should be to eradicate the infecting pathogen, minimization of resistance selection in normal nasopharynx flora, and prevention of transmission of resistant clones from nasopharynx should also be taken into account.

Pharmacodynamic parameters as serum fT>MIC for β-lactams can be related to bacterial eradication at the infection site, and the subsequent therapeutic outcome together with prevention of resistance [37] also in normal flora. This study explores the effects of serum drug profiles over 24 h of different β-lactam regimens on the natural evolution of the simulated niche. Although it may be argued that serum concentrations do not resemble nasopharynx concentrations, free-drug concentrations were used as an approximation despite the fact that protein binding of the highly bound cephalosporin may not highly influence bacterial killing [38]. In addition, in order to know the effects of β-lactamase production on antibiotic pharmacokinetics and its consequences on pharmacodynamic parameters predicting antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic parameters were determined with concentrations measured in bacterial mixed inocula simulations and in bacteria-free simulations. The presence of the β-lactamase did not alter the concentrations of cefditoren (TEM-1 β-lactamase resistant) but highly modified those of amoxicillin over the entire dosing interval in amoxicillin tid regimen simulations, and in a lesser extent (from 4 h on) in amoxicillin/clavulanic acid tid regimen simulations. This led to pharmacokinetic parameters of amoxicillin significantly lower in mixed inocula simulations, with fT>MIC values different if β-lactamase activity is considered or not.

As a result, the activity of cefditoren was not influenced by the presence of β-lactamase, and this cephalosporin eradicated S. pyogenes and co-pathogens as H. influenzae, and decreased S. pneumoniae population in 94%. In the case of the tid regimen of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, the β-lactamase production by the BLPACR strain (resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid: fT>MIC of only 4.6%) protected the BL+ H. influenzae that although susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (MIC = 2 µg/ml; fT>MIC 32.8%), was not eradicated or even diminished. The same occurred with S. pneumoniae (MIC = 2 µg/ml; fT>MIC 32.8%) that was only reduced in <1 log10. However the presence of the β-lactamase did not avoid eradication of S. pyogenes (MIC = 0.03 µg/ml; fT>MIC 99.9%). On the contrary, in tid amoxicillin simulations, the maintenance and even increase in β-lactamase producing strains (fT>MIC 0%) were able to protect not only S. pneumoniae (because a decrease in fT>MIC from 43.2% to 17.7% in bacteria-free vs. mixed inocula simulations) but also S. pyogenes (decrease in fT>MIC from 99.9% to 24.9%) from eradication.

The bacteriological failure rates of penicillins increased from 2 to 10% in the early 70's, but beginning in the late 70's, penicillin bacteriological failure rates increased to 30% in 2000's [39], maybe as the prevalence of β-lactamase production increased. Despite different causes for treatment failure (lack of compliance, reexposure, eradication of pharyngeal flora, bacterial fitness), and contradictory reports on the effects of co-pathogenicity [39], [40], the results of this study reinforces the concept of “indirect pathogen” since β-lactamase production in mixed inocula (resembling pharyngeal flora) decreased amoxicillin concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters against S. pneumoniae or S. pyogenes, when clavulanic acid was not present, in such a magnitude that adequate values were not obtained and eradication was precluded. The presence of clavulanic acid along a tid regimen countered this effect of indirect pathogenicity by protecting amoxicillin from β-lactamase degradation, and a very susceptible strain as S. pyogenes was eradicated. However since the β-lactamase was produced by a strain resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (as the BLPACR strain), clavulanic acid was not able to protect amoxicillin from degradation in such an extent to allow its bactericidal activity against strains with MICs in the limit of susceptibility, as the H. influenzae BL+ and S. pneumoniae (MICs of 2 µg/ml) that were protected from eradication, thus selecting them. The quality of TEM β-lactamase resistance of cefditoren avoided this co-pathogenicity effect of H. influenzae β-lactamase production.

Although this study is only an approach of what could occur in the human nasopharynx, the results suggest that, at least in vitro, the presence of β-lactamase producing microorganisms may protect other microorganisms present in the niche. This effect of “indirect pathogen” or co-pathogenicity seems to be gradual since β-lactamase inhibitors (as calvulanic acid in tid regimens) countered it for strains very susceptible to amoxicillin as S. pyogenes but not for susceptible strains with amoxicillin MICs values in the limit of susceptibility as S. pneumoniae. These in vitro findings indicate a potential therapeutic advantage for β-lactamase resistant cephalosporins with high intrinsic activity against streptococci.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: P. Coronel is an employee of Tedec-Meiji Farma SA

Funding: This study was supported in part by an unrestricted grant from Tedec-Meiji Farma S.A., Madrid, Spain. The sponsor had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Brook I, Gober AE. Recovery of potential pathogens and interfering bacteria in the nasopharynx of otitis media-prone children and their smoking and nonsmoking parents. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:509–512. doi: 10.1001/archotol.131.6.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sá-Leão R, Nunes S, Brito-Avô A, Alves CR, Carriço JÁ, et al. High rates of transmission of and colonization by Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae within a day care center revealed in a longitudinal study. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:225–234. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01551-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hammitt LL, Bruden DL, Butler JC, Baggett HC, Hurlburt DA, et al. Indirect effect of conjugate vaccine on adult carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae: an explanation of trends in invasive pneumococcal disease. J Infect Dis. 2006;193:1487–1494. doi: 10.1086/503805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Murthy TF. Haemophilus influenzae. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett principles and practice of infectious diseases, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. pp. 2661–2669. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Smith-Vaughan HC, Leach AJ, Shelby-James TM, Kemp K, Kemp DJ, et al. Carriage of multiple ribotypes of non-encapsulated Haemophilus influenzae in aboriginal infants with otitis media. Epidemiol Infect. 1996;116:177–183. doi: 10.1017/s0950268800052419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Musher DM. Streptococcus pneumoniae. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett principles and practice of infectious diseases, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. pp. 2392–2411. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sá-Leão R, Tomasz A, Santos Sanches I, de Lencastre H. Pilot study of the genetic diversity of the pneumococcal nasopharyngeal flora among children attending day care centers. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:3577–3585. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3577-3585.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ekdahl K, Ahlinder I, Hansson HB, Melander E, Mölstad S, et al. Duration of nasopharyngeal carriage of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: experiences from the South Swedish Pneumococcal Intervention Project. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:1113–1117. doi: 10.1086/516103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Melegaro A, Choi Y, Pebody R, Gay N. Pneumococcal carriage in United Kingdom families: estimating serotype-specific transmission parameters from longitudinal data. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:228–235. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pérez-Trallero E, García-de-la-Fuente C, García-Rey C, Baquero F, Aguilar L, et al. Geographical and ecological analysis of resistance, coresistance, and coupled resistance to antimicrobials in respiratory pathogenic bacteria in Spain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:1965–1972. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.5.1965-1972.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.García-Cobos S, Campos J, Lázaro E, Román F, Cercenado E, et al. Ampicillin-resistant non-beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae in Spain: recent emergence of clonal isolates with increased resistance to cefotaxime and cefixime. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:2564–2573. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00354-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bisno AL, Stevens D. Streptococcus pyogenes. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, editors. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett principles and practice of infectious diseases, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2005. pp. 2362–2379. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Martin JM, Green M, Barbadora KA, Wald ER. Group A streptococci among school-aged children: clinical characteristics and the carrier state. Pediatrics. 2004;114:1212–1219. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brook I. The role of beta-lactamase producing bacteria and bacterial interference in streptococcal tonsillitis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001;17:439–442. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00321-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brook I, Gober AE. Recovery of interfering and beta-lactamase-producing bacteria from group A beta-haemolytic streptococci carriers and non-carriers. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55:1741–1744. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46796-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Baquero F. Evolution and the nature of time. Int Microbiol. 2005;8:81–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cafini F, Aguilar L, Sevillano D, Giménez MJ, Alou L, et al. Decrease in bacterial load versus resistance selection of pneumococcal subpopulations by β-lactam physiological concentrations over time: An in vitro pharmacodynamic simulation. Microbial Drug Res. 2008;14:13–21. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2008.0783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sevillano D, Aguilar L, Alou L, Giménez MJ, Echevarría O, et al. Effects of antimicrobials on the competitive growth of Streptococcus pneumoniae: a pharmacodynamic in vitro model approach to selection of resistant populations. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58:794–801. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dabernat H, Delmas C, Seguy M, Pelissier R, Faucon G, et al. Diversity of beta-lactam resistance-conferring amino acid substitutions in penicillin-binding protein 3 of Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:2208–2218. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.7.2208-2218.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Scriver SR, Walmsley SL, Kau CL, Hoban DJ, Brunton J, et al. Determination of susceptibilities of Canadian isolates of Haemophilus influenzae and characterization of their ß-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents of Chemother. 1994;38:1678–1680. doi: 10.1128/aac.38.7.1678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Growth Aerobically-Sixth Edition: Approved Standard M7-A6. Wayne, PA, USA: NCCLS; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Augmentin package insert. www.fda.gov.
  • 23.Cefditoren package insert. www.fda.gov.
  • 24.Torrico M, Aguilar L, González N, Giménez MJ, Echeverría O, et al. Influence of TEM-1 beta-lactamase on the pharmacodynamic activity of simulated total versus free-drug serum concentrations of cefditoren (400 milligrams) versus amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (2,000/125 milligrams) against Haemophilus influenzae strains exhibiting an N526K mutation in the ftsI gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:3699–3706. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01530-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Andrews JM. Microbiological assays. In: Reeves DS, Wise R, Andrews JM, White LO, editors. Clinical Antimicrobial Assays, 1st edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999. pp. 35–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Martín M, Aguilar L, Balcabao IP, Gómez-Lus ML, Dal-Ré R, et al. In-vitro pharmacodynamic simulation of clavulanic acid concentrations: effect on Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae beta-lactamase activity. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997;39:290–292. doi: 10.1093/jac/39.2.290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Prieto J, Aguilar L, Giménez MJ, Toro D, Gómez-Lus ML, et al. In vitro activities of co-amoxiclav at concentrations achieved in human serum against the resistant subpopulation of heteroresistant Staphylococcus aureus: a controlled study with vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:1574–1577. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.7.1574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Seventeenth Informational Supplement, M100-S17. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gillespie SH, Voelker LL, Dickens A. Evolutionary barriers to quinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Microb Drug Resist. 2002;8:79–84. doi: 10.1089/107662902760190617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Rozen DE, McGee L, Levin BR, Klugman KP. Fitness costs of fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51:412–416. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01161-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nuermberger EL, Bishai WR. Antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: what does the future hold?. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(Suppl 4):S363–371. doi: 10.1086/382696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brook I, Foote PA. Efficacy of penicillin versus cefdinir in eradication of group A streptococci and tonsillar flora. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:4787–4788. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.11.4787-4788.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brook I, Gober AE. Increased recovery of Moraxella catarrhalis and Haemophilus influenzae in association with group A beta-haemolytic streptococci in healthy children and those with pharyngo-tonsillitis. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55:989–992. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46325-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Casey JR, Pichichero ME. The evidence base for cephalosporin superiority over penicillin in streptococcal pharyngitis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;57(3 Suppl):S39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bisno AL. Are cephalosporins superior to penicillin for treatment of acute streptococcal pharyngitis?. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1535–1537. doi: 10.1086/392520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shulman ST, Gerber MA. So what's wrong with penicillin for strep throat?. Pediatrics. 2004;113:1816–1819. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ball P, Baquero F, Cars O, File T, Garau J, et al. Antibiotic therapy of community respiratory tract infections: strategies for optimal outcomes and minimized resistance emergence. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;49:31–40. doi: 10.1093/jac/49.1.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sevillano D, Aguilar L, Alou L, Giménez MJ, González N, et al. High protein binding and cidal activity against penicillin-resistant S. pneumniae: a cefditoren in vitro pharmacodynamic simulation. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pichichero ME, Casey JR, Mayes T, Francis AB, Marsocci SM, et al. Penicillin failure in streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis: causes and remedies. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000;19:917–923. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200009000-00035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stjernquist-Desatnik A, Holst E. Tonsillar microbial flora: comparison of recurrent tonsillitis and normal tonsils. Acta Otolaryngol. 1999;119:102–106. doi: 10.1080/00016489950182034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES