Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine logoLink to The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
. 1985 Sep-Oct;58(5):443–452.

Immunodiagnosis of sexually transmitted disease.

J Schachter
PMCID: PMC2589942  PMID: 3911605

Abstract

Methods for detecting microbial antigens in clinical specimens offer an alternative to culture in the diagnosis of some sexually transmitted diseases. Developers of the immunologic methods are faced with a number of problems in evaluating the new tests. Traditionally, these tests are compared to culture as the "gold standard." Unfortunately, culture for Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Chlamydia trachomatis--the two agents most commonly sought--is considerably less sensitive than 100 percent. Immunologic methods may appear to produce false positives when the paired specimens are actually false-negative cultures. Another source of discordant results is sampling variation. These considerations, however, will not account for all false-positive results. Even the best non-culture methods have a low rate of false-positive results. If a new test has a specificity of 97 percent, it, by definition, yields approximately 3 percent false-positive reactions. In low-prevalence settings this false-positive rate will create problems in interpreting the results. For example, in a population with 3 percent prevalence of infection, a positive result in a 97 percent specificity test could only have a predictive value of 50 percent. Most testing for STD agents is performed in low-prevalence settings. None of the currently available immunodiagnostic procedures has a performance profile that suggests it will be satisfactory for diagnostic use in the low-prevalence setting.

Full text

PDF
443

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adger H., Shafer M. A., Sweet R. L., Schachter J. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in adolescent males: value of first-catch urine examination. Lancet. 1984 Oct 27;2(8409):944–945. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)91164-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brorson J. E., Holmberg I., Nygren B., Seeberg S. Vancomycin-sensitive strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. A problem for the diagnostic laboratory. Br J Vener Dis. 1973 Oct;49(5):452–453. doi: 10.1136/sti.49.5.452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapel T. A., Smeltzer M. Culture of urinary sediment for the diagnosis of gonorrhoea in women. Br J Vener Dis. 1975 Feb;51(1):25–27. doi: 10.1136/sti.51.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dans P. E., Rothenberg R., Holmes K. K. Gonococcal serology: how soon, how useful, and how much. J Infect Dis. 1977 Feb;135(2):330–334. doi: 10.1093/infdis/135.2.330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Judson F. N., Werness B. A. Combining cervical and anal-canal specimens for gonorrhea on a single culture plate. J Clin Microbiol. 1980 Aug;12(2):216–219. doi: 10.1128/jcm.12.2.216-219.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McCormack W. M., Reynolds G. H. Effect of menstrual cycle and method of contraception on recovery of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. JAMA. 1982 Mar 5;247(9):1292–1294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Paavonen J. Chlamydia trachomatis-induced urethritis in female partners of men with nongonococcal urethritis. Sex Transm Dis. 1979 Apr-Jun;6(2):69–71. doi: 10.1097/00007435-197904000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rudrik J. T., Waller J. M., Britt E. M. Efficacy of an enzyme immunoassay with uncentrifuged first-voided urine for detection of gonorrhea in males. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):577–578. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.3.577-578.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schachter J., McCormack W. M., Smith R. F., Parks R. M., Bailey R., Ohlin A. C. Enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of gonorrhea. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Jan;19(1):57–59. doi: 10.1128/jcm.19.1.57-59.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schachter J., Stoner E., Moncada J. Screening for chlamydial infections in women attending family planning clinics. West J Med. 1983 Mar;138(3):375–379. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schachter J. Urine as a specimen for diagnosis of sexually transmitted diseases. Am J Med. 1983 Jul 28;75(1B):93–97. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)90078-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Smith T. F., Weed L. A. Comparison of urethral swabs, urine, and urinary sediment for the isolation of Chlamydia. J Clin Microbiol. 1976 Aug;2(2):134–135. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stamm W. E., Tam M., Koester M., Cles L. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in Mccoy cell cultures with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 Apr;17(4):666–668. doi: 10.1128/jcm.17.4.666-668.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tam M. R., Stamm W. E., Handsfield H. H., Stephens R., Kuo C. C., Holmes K. K., Ditzenberger K., Krieger M., Nowinski R. C. Culture-independent diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis using monoclonal antibodies. N Engl J Med. 1984 May 3;310(18):1146–1150. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198405033101803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vecchio T. J. Predictive value of a single diagnostic test in unselected populations. N Engl J Med. 1966 May 26;274(21):1171–1173. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196605262742104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine are provided here courtesy of Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine

RESOURCES