Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1991 Nov;59(11):4103–4109. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.11.4103-4109.1991

Adherence of oral "Streptococcus milleri" cells to surfaces in broth cultures.

H Eifuku-Koreeda 1, T Yakushiji 1, K Kitada 1, M Inoue 1
PMCID: PMC259003  PMID: 1937769

Abstract

Cells of representative strains of oral "Streptococcus milleri" firmly adhered to glass surfaces when grown in glucose broths as well as in fructose and sucrose broths. Cellular adherence occurred on saliva-coated glass surfaces as well as uncoated surfaces, but the cells of only a few (6 of 69) tested adherent strains agglutinated upon the addition of human whole-saliva supernatant. Thus, the firm adherence of growing "S. milleri" cells is independent of sucrose and salivary macromolecules. Two macroscopic forms of cell adherence were observed: one was a coarse-granule type and one was a tiny-granule type covered with a thin homogeneous membranous material. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that, in both types, a stringy substance interconnected the cells and connected the cells to glass surfaces, with amorphous flocklike materials present in the intercellular space. Of the 154 tested strains, 128 were adherent, of which 90 were firmly and extensively (+2 or +3) adherent. Most strains of the serovars f/F, g, h, i, j, g-, and gj- were extensively adherent. Generally, cells of the more strongly adherent strains were more hydrophobic and spontaneously aggregating. However, there also existed a few hydrophilic and nonaggregating but extensively adherent strains. The presence of trypsin or pronase completely inhibited the adherence of some strains (mostly nonaggregating) but did not at all inhibit that of others (mostly aggregating). The adhering groups did not significantly differ in their cell surface hydrophobicities. Therefore, at least two factors, one proteinaceous and one nonproteinaceous, appear to be principally involved in the firm surface adherence of "S. milleri."

Full text

PDF
4103

Images in this article

4105Image
on p.4105
4106Image
on p.4106

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beachey E. H. Bacterial adherence: adhesin-receptor interactions mediating the attachment of bacteria to mucosal surface. J Infect Dis. 1981 Mar;143(3):325–345. doi: 10.1093/infdis/143.3.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark W. B., Beem J. E., Nesbitt W. E., Cisar J. O., Tseng C. C., Levine M. J. Pellicle receptors for Actinomyces viscosus type 1 fimbriae in vitro. Infect Immun. 1989 Oct;57(10):3003–3008. doi: 10.1128/iai.57.10.3003-3008.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Edwardsson S., Mejàre B. Streptococcus milleri (Guthof) and Streptococcus mutans in the mouths of infants before and after tooth eruption. Arch Oral Biol. 1978;23(9):811–814. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(78)90160-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eifuku H., Kitada K., Yakushiji T., Inoue M. Lactose-sensitive and -insensitive cell surface interactions of oral Streptococcus milleri strains and actinomyces. Infect Immun. 1991 Jan;59(1):460–463. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.1.460-463.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Eifuku H., Yakushiji T., Mizuno J., Kudo N., Inoue M. Cellular coaggregation of oral Streptococcus milleri with actinomyces. Infect Immun. 1990 Jan;58(1):163–168. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.1.163-168.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibbons R. J. Adherent interactions which may affect microbial ecology in the mouth. J Dent Res. 1984 Mar;63(3):378–385. doi: 10.1177/00220345840630030401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gibbons R. J. Bacterial adhesion to oral tissues: a model for infectious diseases. J Dent Res. 1989 May;68(5):750–760. doi: 10.1177/00220345890680050101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gibbons R. J., Hay D. I. Adsorbed salivary acidic proline-rich proteins contribute to the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans JBP to apatitic surfaces. J Dent Res. 1989 Sep;68(9):1303–1307. doi: 10.1177/00220345890680090201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gibbons R. J., Hay D. I. Human salivary acidic proline-rich proteins and statherin promote the attachment of Actinomyces viscosus LY7 to apatitic surfaces. Infect Immun. 1988 Feb;56(2):439–445. doi: 10.1128/iai.56.2.439-445.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gibbons R. J., Nygaard M. Synthesis of insoluble dextran and its significance in the formation of gelatinous deposits by plaque-forming streptococci. Arch Oral Biol. 1968 Oct;13(10):1249–1262. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(68)90081-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gossling J. Occurrence and pathogenicity of the Streptococcus milleri group. Rev Infect Dis. 1988 Mar-Apr;10(2):257–285. doi: 10.1093/clinids/10.2.257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamada S., Slade H. D. Biology, immunology, and cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans. Microbiol Rev. 1980 Jun;44(2):331–384. doi: 10.1128/mr.44.2.331-384.1980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kolenbrander P. E. Surface recognition among oral bacteria: multigeneric coaggregations and their mediators. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1989;17(2):137–159. doi: 10.3109/10408418909105746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kolenbrander P. E., Williams B. L. Prevalence of viridans streptococci exhibiting lactose-inhibitable coaggregation with oral actinomycetes. Infect Immun. 1983 Aug;41(2):449–452. doi: 10.1128/iai.41.2.449-452.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Loesche W. J. Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol Rev. 1986 Dec;50(4):353–380. doi: 10.1128/mr.50.4.353-380.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ruoff K. L. Streptococcus anginosus ("Streptococcus milleri"): the unrecognized pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1988 Jan;1(1):102–108. doi: 10.1128/cmr.1.1.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tinanoff N., Tanzer J. M., Freedman M. L. In vitro colonization of Streptococcus mutans on enamel. Infect Immun. 1978 Sep;21(3):1010–1019. doi: 10.1128/iai.21.3.1010-1019.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Willcox M. D., Drucker D. B. Surface structures, co-aggregation and adherence phenomena of Streptococcus oralis and related species. Microbios. 1989;59(238):19–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yakushiji T., Katsuki M., Yoshimitsu A., Mizuno J., Inoue M. Isolation and physiological characterization of Streptococcus milleri strains from human dental plaque. Microbios. 1988;55(224-225):161–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yakushiji T., Konagawa R., Oda M., Inoue M. Serological variation in oral Streptococcus milleri. J Med Microbiol. 1988 Oct;27(2):145–151. doi: 10.1099/00222615-27-2-145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yoshizaki N. [Cariogenicity of Streptococcus intermedius ATCC 27335]. Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi. 1983 Jun;21(2):371–386. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES