Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine logoLink to The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
. 1986 Sep-Oct;59(5):475–484.

The first fifty years of the Connecticut Tumor Registry: reminiscences and prospects.

W Haenszel, M G Curnen
PMCID: PMC2590186  PMID: 3541408

Abstract

The first fifty years of the Connecticut Tumor Registry (1935-1985) have seen unprecedented progress in the collection of standardized data on cancer patients and in the processing of these data, from paper documents to punch cards and magnetic tapes. The need for collecting such information was first recognized, in the early 1930s, by a group of physicians, health professionals, and laymen in New Haven who observed alarming increases in cancer rates and poor survival of cancer patients in this city. This paper recalls the growth and development of the registry and the role played by the Connecticut legislature, the State Medical Society, the Connecticut Department of Health, and the National Cancer Institute in this process. For half a century, the registry has provided assistance to practitioners, hospitals, and research scientists, not only in Connecticut but across the country and around the world. By making available reliable data on incidence and survival, the registry has played a key role in patient management, clinical trials, and etiologic studies. It has also demonstrated the value and served as an exemplary model of a population-based registry. At this juncture in its history, prospects for the future of the Connecticut Tumor Registry appear bright. Its data base will be an essential resource for the recently established Cancer Control Research Unit (CCRU) in the state and for new intervention studies by investigators at Yale, the University of Connecticut, and the State Health Department.

Full text

PDF
475

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BAILAR J. C., 3rd, LOWRY R., GOLDENBERG I. S. A note on follow-up of lost patients. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1961 Sep;6:123–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BERKSON J., GAGE R. P. Calculation of survival rates for cancer. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 1950 May 24;25(11):270–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailar J. C., 3rd, Thomas L. B., Thomson A. D., Eisenberg H., Vick R. M. Morphology and survival rates of cervical cancer in Connecticut and southwest England. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1966 Jan;19:385–403. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196603)19:3<385::aid-cncr2820190312>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. CUTLER S. J., EDERER F., GRISWOLD M. H., GREENBERG R. A. Survival of breast-cancer patients in Connecticut, 1935-54. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Nov;23:1137–1156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. CUTLER S. J., EDERER F., GRISWOLD M. H., GREENBERG R. A. Survival of patients with uterine cancer, Connecticut, 1935-54. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1960 Mar;24:519–539. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Christine B., Sullivan P. D., Connelly R. R., Foote F. M. Cancer incidence, mortality and survival in Connecticut during the 1960's. Conn Med. 1970 Aug;34(8):564–569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Connelly R. R., Campbell P. C., Eisenberg H. Central registry of cancer cases in Connecticut. Public Health Rep. 1968 May;83(5):386–390. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Curnen M. G., Thompson W. D., Flannery J. T. The Connecticut Tumor Registry: potential for increasing its usefulness in etiologic research. Conn Med. 1985 Nov;49(11):753–759. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Curnen M. G., Thompson W. D., Heston J. F., Flannery J. T. Cancer prevention: the tumor registry connection. Cancer Detect Prev. 1984;7(3):191–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DOLL R., HILL A. B. Smoking and carcinoma of the lung; preliminary report. Br Med J. 1950 Sep 30;2(4682):739–748. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4682.739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. EDERER F., AXTELL L. M., CUTLER S. J. The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1961 Sep;6:101–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gershman S. T., Flannery J. T., Barrett H., Nadel R. K., Meigs J. W. Development of the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Conn Med. 1976 Oct;40(10):697–701. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hurst M. C. The tumor registrar: past, present, future. Conn Med. 1985 Nov;49(11):737–740. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Janerich D. T., Hadjimichael O., Flannery J. Strategy for elimination of invasive cervical cancer in Connecticut. Conn Med. 1985 Nov;49(11):746–753. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Meigs J. W. The Connecticut cancer epidemiology unit. Conn Med. 1975 Oct;39(10):637–640. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Meigs J. W. The impact of the Connecticut Tumor Registry on cancer epidemiology. Conn Med. 1985 Nov;49(11):741–746. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. OTTENHEIMER E. J., OUGHTERSON A. W. Observations on cancer of the colon and rectum in Connecticut; an analysis based on 5572 proved cases. N Engl J Med. 1955 Apr 7;252(14):561–567. doi: 10.1056/NEJM195504072521402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. WYNDER E. L., GRAHAM E. A. Tobacco smoking as a possible etiologic factor in bronchiogenic carcinoma; a study of 684 proved cases. J Am Med Assoc. 1950 May 27;143(4):329–336. doi: 10.1001/jama.1950.02910390001001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine are provided here courtesy of Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine

RESOURCES