Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 3.
Published in final edited form as: Genesis. 2007 Jan;45(1):51–58. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20264

A Sall4 Mutant Mouse Model Useful for Studying the Role of Sall4 in Early Embryonic Development and Organogenesis

Madhuri Warren 1,2,, Wei Wang 1,, Sarah Spiden 1, Dongrong Chen-Murchie 1, David Tannahill 1, Karen P Steel 1, Allan Bradley 1,*
PMCID: PMC2593393  EMSID: UKMS3013  PMID: 17216607

Summary

SALL4 is a homologue of the Drosophila homeotic gene spalt, a zinc finger transcription factor, required for inner cell mass proliferation in early embryonic development. It also interacts with other transcription factors to control the development of the anorectal region, kidney, heart, limbs, and brain. Truncating mutations in SALL4 cause Okihiro syndrome, manifest as Duane anomaly, radial ray defects and sensorineural and conductive deafness. We report the characterization of a novel murine Sall4 null allele created by bacterial recombineering in ES cells. Homozygous mutant mice exhibit early embryonic lethality. Heterozygous mutant mice recapitulate phenotypic features of Okihiro syndrome including deafness, lower anogenital tract abnormalities, renal hypoplasia, anencephaly, Hirschprung’s disease, and skeletal defects. This phenotype shows important differences in cardiac and ear manifestations to previously characterized Sall4 mutant alleles and should prove useful for the investigation of the influence of modifier alleles and protein interactions on the transcriptional regulatory function of Sall4.

Keywords: bacterial recombineering, Sall4, Okihiro syndrome, mouse, organogenesis, embryonic stem cells


SALL4 is a member of the SALL gene family of zinc finger transcription factors (Kohlhase et al., 1996), containing multiple C2H2 double zinc finger domains, homologous to the Drosophila spalt (sal) homeotic gene important in pattern formation and cell specification (de Celis et al., 1996, 1999; Jurgens, 1988; Kuhnlein et al., 1994). Murine Sall4 (Kohlhase et al., 2002a) is required for inner cell mass proliferation in early embryonic development (Sakaki-Yumoto et al., 2006). It also interacts with other transcription factors, such as Sall1 and the Tbx family of transcription factors to control the development of the anorectal region, kidney, heart, limbs and brain, by acting on downstream targets including Fgf10 (Kiefer et al., 2003; Koshiba-Takeuchi et al., 2006; Sakaki-Yumoto et al., 2006). Mutations in SALL1 are associated with Townes-Brock syndrome (OMIM 107480) (Kohlhase, 2000; Powell and Michaelis, 1999) and mutations in SALL4 cause Okihiro syndrome (OMIM 607323), an autosomal dominant human familial disorder, characterized by a triad of Duane anomaly, radial ray limb defects, and deafness (Okihiro et al., 1977). Less penetrant developmental anomalies includes atrial septal defect (ASD), renal hypoplasia, anal stenosis or imperforate anus, and Hirschprung’s disease (Kohlhase et al., 2005). Nonsense, truncating and missense mutations, plus chromosomal deletions, resulting in loss of one or all of the zinc finger domains of SALL4 have been described in families with Okihiro syndrome (Al-Baradie et al., 2002; Borozdin et al., 2004; Kohlhase et al., 2002b; Miertus et al., 2006). Although the syndrome is thought to arise from haploinsufficiency of SALL4 it is still unclear why some truncations result in more severe phenotypes than others (Kohlhase et al., 2005).

Using bacterial recombineering technology in ES cells (Liu et al., 2003), we have generated mice with a targeted disruption of the gene. Homozygous mutant mice are embryonic lethal, while heterozygous mice display a range of developmental defects that recapitulate many of the features of Okihiro syndrome. The phenotype in heterozygous mice is associated with a reduction of Sall4 mRNA transcript, suggesting that it is due to haploinsufficiency of the Sall4 gene. This phenotype shows important differences in cardiac and ear phenotypes to previously characterized Sall4 mutant alleles (Koshiba-Takeuchi et al., 2006; Sakaki-Yumoto et al., 2006) and should prove useful for the investigation of the influence of modifier alleles and protein interactions on the transcriptional regulatory function of Sall4.

RESULTS

To inactivate Sall4 we generated a targeting vector (Sall4-TV1) by bacterial recombineering which was designed to delete exons 2-4 (Fig. 1a). This deletion removes all zinc finger domains of the protein and is expected to result in a null allele. The Sall4-TV1 was used to target the locus in AB2.2 ES cells. Targeted clones were obtained at a rate of 15% (Fig. 1b). Two of these targeted clones were used to establish the Sall4Brdm1 allele in mice (Fig. 1c). PCR analysis of E3.5 blastocysts identified all three genotypes to be present (Fig. 1d). RT-PCR was performed on E8.5 embryos (Fig. 1e). A reduction of mRNA transcript was evident in Sall4m1/+ embryos compared with Sall4+/+ embryos. Whole mount analysis of Sall4m1/+ embryos at E10.5 revealed that Sall4 mRNA was expressed with the expected tissue distribution, namely midbrain, branchial arch, and limb bud mesenchyme (Kohlhase et al., 2002a; Sakaki-Yumoto et al., 2006), however, the levels of Sall4 mRNA were very low compared with wild type embryos (Fig. 1e,f).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Targeted mutation of Sall4.(a) Structure of the Sall4 locus, the Sall4 targeting vector (Sall4-TV), and targeted allele Sall4tm1Brd. S, SpeI, triangle, loxP site; MC1tK, thymidine kinase negative selection cassette. (b) Southern blot analysis of SpeI digested genomic DNA hybridized with the 5′ probe, +/+, wild type AB2.2 ES cells; m1/+, Sall4m1/+ targeted ES cells. (c) PCR analysis using allele specific primers on genomic DNA of P21 pups. (d) PCR analysis of E3.5 embryos. All three genotypes are present. (e) RT-PCR analysis on reverse-transcribed RNA from E8.5 Sall4+/+ and Sall4m1/+ embryos. M, DNA marker ladder. (f, g) Whole mount in situ hybridization in E10.5 embryos. (f) Sall4 is expressed in the midbrain, branchial arches, limb buds, and tail bud in Sall4+/+ embryos. (g) In Sall4m1/+ embryos, greatly reduced expression is seen in these areas. mb, midbrain; mx, first branchial arch; b, second branchial arch; fl, fore limb; hl, hind limb; tb, tail bud.

Sall4Brdm1/+ (Sall4m1/+) mice were intercrossed and the resultant litters were genotyped (Table 1). Homozygous mutant (Sall4m1/m1) mice were not identified, thus the Sall4Brdm1 allele was homozygous lethal. The litter sizes from the Sall4m1/+ intercrosses were significantly lower than expected, because of the decreased numbers of heterozygous as well as homozygous mice (Table 1). To determine the time of death of the Sall4m1/m1 mice, timed matings were performed and litters were genotyped (n = 11, E8.5; n = 4, E9.5; n = 4, E10.5; n = 9, E12.5; n = 14 E14.5, n = 54, E15.5; n = 8, E17.5). Sall4m1/m1 embryos were not detected at any of the stages examined beyond E8.5, indicating that Sall4m1/m1 embryos die between E3.5 and E8.5. As well as Sall4m1/m1 embryonic lethality, a large number of heterozygous Sall4m1/+ pups did not survive to weaning (Table 2). The estimated percentage Sall4m1/+ pups that died before weaning varied from 16 to 55% depending on the type of cross and backcross generation (Table 2).

Table 1.

Summary of Gestational Mortality of Sall4m1/+and Sall4m1/m1Mice in Weaned Offspring of Sall4m1/+Intercrosses and Backcrosses

Male × Female Number of litters Average litter size No. of Sall4m1/+ pups No. of Sall4+/+ pups Ratio of Sall4m1/+:Sall4+/+ pups
Sall4m1/+ × Sall4m1/+ 26 4.7 ± 1.1 44 77 0.57:1
Sall4m1/+ × Sall4+/+ 71 5.5 ± 1.0 116 273 0.42:1
Sall4+/+ × Sall4m1/+

121 weaned offspring of Sall4m1/+ intercrosses and backcrosses to C57BL/6 (C57BL/6TyrC-Brd) were genotyped. No homozygous Sall4m1/m1 offspring were identified amongst the 121 weaned offspring of 26 Sall4m1/+ intercrosses (P < 0.007, Student’s t-test). The average litter size for Sall4m1/+ intercrosses (4.7 ± 1.1) and Sall4m1/+ backcrosses to C57BL/6TyrC-Brd mice (5.5 ± 1.0) was significantly reduced (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). The ratio of heterozygous:wild type pups differed in all crosses (0.57:1-0.42:1) from the expected Mendelian ratio of 1:1 for backcrosses or 2:1 for intercrosses.

Table 2.

Summary of Neonatal Lethality in Offspring from Sall4m1/+Backcrosses and Intercrosses

Cross Total pups born Total pups alive at day 21 Total pups dead before day 21 Total recorded Sall4+/+ pups at day 21 Estimated Sall4m1/+ pups at birth Percentage of Sall4m1/+ pups that died before weaning
Backcrosses
 F1 Sall4m1/+ 110 95 15 57 46-53 16-28
 F2 Sall4m1/+ 440 361 79 270 93-128 31-44
Intercrosses
 F1 Sall4m1/+ 75 55 20 34 34-43 38-49
 F2 Sall4m1/+ 46 35 11 26 16-20 45-55

671 pups born from 113 litters from 16 different mating pairs (Sall4m1/+ intercrosses and backcrosses to C57BL/6 (C57BL/6TyrC-Brd) were analyzed. Of these, 125 pups died before P21 at various ages from P1 onwards. Of the remaining 546 pups genotyped at weaning, 387 were wild type. The estimated number of Sall4m1/+ pups at birth and the percentage of Sall4m1/+ pups that died before P21 was calculated assuming either a Mendelian ratio of Sall4+/+ and Sall4m1/+ pups in the deaths of each litter, or that all dead pups were Sall4m1/+, to obtain an estimated percentage range of deaths in Sall4m1/+ pups.

Phenotypic abnormalities were identified in surviving heterozygous embryos and adult mice. Exencephaly was observed in 5/121 (4%) of conceptuses between E14.5 and E18.5 (Fig. 2a). All of the exencephalic embryos were determined to be Sall4m1/+ by genotyping.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

Developmental defects in Sall4m1/+ mice. (a) Exencephaly in E16.5 Sall4m1/+ embryo. (b, c) Normal right kidney (b) and hypoplastic left kidney (c) of E16.5 Sall4m1/+ embryo. The hypoplastic kidney is smaller, without well defined zonation, scale bar, 1 mm. C, renal cortex; M, renal medulla. (d) Normal kidney from E16.5 Sall4m1/+ embryo exhibiting well formed glomeruli and tubules, scale bar, 500 μm. (e) Hypoplastic kidney contains primitive nephrogenic vesicles and mesenchyme, scale bar, 500 μm. G, glomerulus; CT, proximal and distal convoluted tubules; NV, nephrogenic vesicle; M, mesenchyme. (f) Lower anogenital tract abnormalities in adult Sall4m1/+ mice. The lower rectum, vagina, and urethra all open into a persistent cloaca. UT, uterus; B, bladder; V, vagina; U, urethra; C, persistent cloaca; R, rectum; S, spinal column, scale bar, 1 mm. (g-l), Hirschprung’s disease in Sall4m1/+ mouse with bowel obstruction. (g, h) Enteric ganglion cells (arrow) in the intramural and submucosal plexuses of the large bowel in Sall4+/+ mouse, (g) H&E stained section, (h) acetyl cholinesterase staining, scale bar, 100 μm. (i-l) Sall4m1/+ mice with bowel obstruction. (i, j) Proximal dilated bowel with sparse enteric neurons (arrows), scale bar, 50 μm. (k, l) Distal segment of bowel, enteric ganglion cells absent; scale bar, 50 μm.

Histological analysis of 40 embryos and neonates (20 Sall4m1/+; 20 Sall4+/+ littermate controls) between E15.5 and P4 revealed 7/20 (35%) heterozygous mice with unilateral renal agenesis; and 5/20 (25%) heterozygous mice with renal hypoplasia (Fig. 2b-e). No wild type mice were identified either with unilateral agenesis or hypoplasia of a kidney.

Nine percent (5/56) adult Sall4m1/+ mice exhibited defects of the lower anogenital tract, ranging from imperforate anus, anovaginal fistula formation, and persistent common cloaca (Fig. 2f), to Hirschsprung’s disease due to absence of enteric neurons in the distal colon (Fig. 2g-l).

Adult Sall4m1/+ and Sall4+/+ littermate control mice were tested for impaired hearing by the Preyer reflex at weekly intervals upto 12 weeks of age (Table 3). Fifty percent (9/18) Sall4m1/+ mice showed an absent or weak Preyer reflex by 12 weeks of age, with a mean age of onset of 58 days. Significantly, only 5% (2/43) of the wild type control mice lost their Preyer reflex by 12 weeks of age (P < 0.05, Student’s t-test). Middle ear inflammation was significantly increased in the Sall4m1/+ mutants (67%) compared with the control group (22%) (P < 0.01, Student’s t-test) both macroscopically (Fig. 3a-d) and microscopically (Fig. 3e-h), suggesting that the progressive hearing loss in mutants may be, at least in part, conductive. The tympanic membrane ossicles, cochlea, and vestibular system all appeared normal (15 Sall4m1/+ and 18 Sall4+/+). Scanning electron microscopy revealed no significant differences in the appearance of cochlear sensory hair cells of Sall4m1/+ compared with wild type mice (6 Sall4m1/+ and 4 Sall4+/+) (Fig. 3i,j). However, the possibility of a functional defect resulting in an additional sensorineural component to the hearing loss cannot be excluded. This could be investigated in the future by ABR testing. It would also be pertinent to investigate the expression of Sall4 in the middle and inner ear.

Table 3.

Summary of Hearing Analysis and Morphological Characteristics of Sall4m1/+and Sall4+/+Mice

Genotype Total number of mice tested for Preyer reflex Number of animals with no Preyer reflex Mean age (range) of loss of Preyer reflex (days) Number of mice with macroscopic evidence of middle ear discharge Number of mice with histological otitis media Number of mice with SEM abnormalities
Sall4 +/+ 43 2 (5%) 50 (31-83) 4/18 (22%) 0 (n = 5) 0 (n = 4)
Sall4 m1/+ 18 9 (50%)* 58 (46-76) 10/15 (67%)** 2 (n = 3) 0 (n = 6)

Sall4m1/+ mice show significantly increased progressive hearing loss in the first 3 months of life compared to wild type controls. The Preyer reflex was recorded from a total of 18 Sall4m1/+ and 43 Sall4+/+ mice at 12 weeks. Mice were repeat tested where possible. Significance of hearing loss was determined by comparing the number of Sall4m1/+ mice with an absent reflex to the number of Sall4+/+ tested that had an absent Preyer reflex at each time point using Student’s t-test.

*

P value < 0.05;

**

P value < 0.01, Student’s t-test.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

Conductive deafness in Sall4m1/+ mice. (a-d) Tympanic membrane and middle ear cavity viewed from the external auditory meatus. (a, c) Normal middle ear cavity, Sall4+/+ mice. (b, d) Sall4m1/+ mice with middle ear inflammation. TR, tympanic ring; TM, tympanic membrane; M, malleus; I, incus, scale bar, 1 mm. (e-h) Histological appearance of the middle ear cavity. (e) Normal middle ear cavity of Sall4+/+ mouse, scale bar, 500 μm. (f-h) Sall4m1/+ with suppurative otitis media, middle ear effusion and squamous metaplasia of epithelium, scale bar 100/500 μm. PD, purulent debris; C, normal ciliated epithelium; SM, metaplastic squamous epithelium. (i, j) Scanning electron micrographs show normal inner ear epithelium of Sall4+/+ and Sall4m1/+ mice, scale bar, 5 μm.

Although auditory renal and anogenital tract defect were readily observable in Sall4+/- mice in our model, other features of the human syndrome were mild or non-apparent. Occasionally, Sall4m1/+ mice displayed skeletal defects consisting of shortening of the cranial bones and lateral deviation of the nasal bones, plus absence of the triquetrum, one of the small carpal bones (data not shown). Unlike other described Sall4 mutant alleles cardiac defects were not apparent, as analyzed by MRI (data not shown).

Many of the developmental defects described here recapitulate features of Okihiro syndrome in humans, caused by loss of function mutations in SALL4 (Kohlhase et al., 2005). Humans have been not been reported with homozygous mutations within the SALL4 gene, probably because this would result in early embryonic lethality. Similarly exencephaly is not described in the human syndrome. Like Okihiro syndrome in humans, the nonlethal defects in the surviving heterozygous mice show variable penetrance. This may be due to the influence of modifier alleles in the mixed genetic background.

It is pertinent to compare our model with other recently described Sall4 mutant alleles, which have similar though not identical phenotypes (Koshiba-Takeuchi et al., 2006; Sakaki-Yumoto et al., 2006). A Sall4 gene trap allele (Koshiba-Takeuchi et al., 2006) with an insertion in exon 2 of the gene exhibits a variable embryonic phenotype ranging from VSD to mild limb abnormalities. The heart defects increased in severity when Sall4+/- mice were crossed to Tbx5+/- mice or backcrossed to Black Swiss mice. Compound Sall1+/-/Sall4+/- mice also displayed a more severe cardiac phenotype. In our model, VSDs were not observed—this may be due to the difference in genetic background, namely a predominantly C57BL/6 background compared with a Black Swiss background. Alternatively, the genetrap Sall4+/- allele may act through a dominant negative function rather than just haploinsufficiency, resulting in a more severe phenotype.

A targeted Sall4 allele has also been described (Sakaki-Yumoto et al., 2006). This also deletes all zinc finger domains of the gene but retains the distal portion of exon 4. The phenotype described mentions similar preimplantation embryonic lethality of homozygotes. Heterozygotes show increased postnatal lethality, plus embryonic exencephaly, renal agenesis, anorectal malformations, and heart defects. However, limb defects are not described, and there is no structural evidence for any eye defect. The reason for the differences in observed phenotype between structurally similar alleles, and between the animal model and the human syndrome is unclear. This may be due to different effects on Sall4 protein-protein interactions and subsequent nuclear localization or transcriptional activation. Sall4 has been shown to interact with other proteins including Sall1 (Kiefer et al., 2003; Koshiba-Takeuchi et al., 2006; Sakaki-Yumoto et al., 2006). In fact, the phenotype of mice with the truncating Sall1 mutation is partly due to dominant negative action on Sall4 (Kiefer et al., 2003). This appears to be via a direct effect on nuclear localization of Sall4 in heterochromatin domains (Sakaki-Yumoto et al., 2006). A recently described missense mutation (H888R) in the most C terminal zinc finger motif of SALL4 in humans results in a mild form of Okihiro syndrome and cranial midline defects (Miertus et al., 2006). This mutant is suggested to have increased DNA binding affinity, which is hypothesized to affect the binding of adjacent zinc fingers, and the transcriptional regulation function of Sall4 by making the dissociation of mutant Sall4 from DNA more difficult (Miertus et al., 2006).

In summary, we describe a novel mutant Sall4 mouse model. This provides an animal model for studying the function of Sall4, which has subtle phenotypic differences to previously described models. Further investigations of Sall4 interactions in these different models may help to elucidate the nature of the genetic control of Sall4 transcriptional regulation.

METHODS

Sall4 Targeting Vector

A replacement vector was constructed using bacterial recombineering (Liu et al., 2003). The retrieval vector consisted of a 16,772 bp portion of Sall4 (NT 4943 to NT 21715) containing exons 2, 3, and 4 from the RPCI21 PAC library clone [RP21-431J12] (Osoegawa et al., 2000), and was constructed from PCR amplified left and right homology arms of 248 and 244 bp, respectively. These were cut with NotI/HindIII and HindIII/SpeI respectively, and ligated into a vector backbone, including the MC1-HSVtk negative selection cassette. This retrieved fragment was used to generate a targeting vector which replaces 8,332 bp of Sall4 from NN 9502 [mouse chromosome 2: 168256993] at the 3′end of intron 1 to NN 17824 [mouse chromosome 2: 168265315] at the 3′ end of exon 4. A loxP-PGK-EM7-NeobpA-loxP cassette (PL452) was used as the positive selection marker. A mini-targeting vector was constructed using the amplified homology arms of 252 bp (left) and 226 bp (right). After recombineering, the Sall4 targeting vector (Sall4-TV) contained 8.45 kb total homology to the Sall4 locus (4559 bp, left arm of homology; 3891 bp, right arm of homology). Primer details available on request.

Gene Targeting and Genotyping

Gene targeting in AB2.2 ES cells (129S7/SvEvBrd-Hprtb-m2; 129S7) were carried out as previously described (Abuin and Bradley, 1996). Targeted clones were identified by Southern blot hybridization as previously described (Ramirez-Solis et al., 1993). A 609 bp fragment (mouse chromosome 2: 168, 251, 675- 168, 252, 284) was used as the 5′ external probe. This probe detects a 9.0 and 6.3 kb SpeI fragment from the wild type and targeted alleles, respectively. A 428 bp 3′ external probe (mouse chromosome 2: 168, 269, 837 - 168, 270, 265) was used to confirm the structure of the targeted allele at the 3′ end. ES cell clones were used to establish transmission within the germ line of mice by standard procedures. Mice were genotyped by PCR using genomic DNA extracted from the tail. The targeted allele was maintained and analyzed in a mixed genetic background consisting of ∼75% C57BL/6JTyrC-Brd and 25% 129/SvEvBrd contribution. Primer details are available on request.

RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from E8.5 embryos using the RNeasy Mini-Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Germany). Five micrograms of total RNA was reverse transcribed using Superscript™ II RT kit (Invitrogen) and 2 pmol of oligo-dT primers according to manufacturers’ instructions. Control RT-PCR of β-actin was performed simultaneously. The RT-PCR products were visualized by running on an agarose gel. PCR primers are available on request.

In Situ and Whole Mount Hybridizations

Mouse embryos and brain tissue (C57BL/6JTyrC-Brd) were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin wax. Eight micrometer sections were hybridized with a digoxygenin-labeled antisense RNA probe to the mouse Sall4 gene (RefSeq ENSMUSG00000051739). Transcription was performed using an Ambion Maxi-Script kit with the addition of digoxygenin UTP (Roche). Fifty nanograms of probe was used for hybridization at 60°C for 6 h, using a Ventana Discovery platform with BlueMap and RiboMap kits, according to manufacturers’ guidelines. The final stringency of washing was 0.1× SSC at 75°C. Sections were counterstained with Nuclear Fast Red. For whole mounts, the probe was hybridized at 62°C for 18 h on an Intavis hybridization platform, according to manufacturers’ protocols.

Histopathology

Adult tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 48 h, embedded in paraffin wax, and sectioned at 4 μm intervals. Embryos for histopathology were fixed and processed similarly, but bisected and serially sectioned at 4 μm intervals in the saggital plane. Sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin. For acetyl cholinesterase staining, segments of distal bowel in OCT were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and cryostat sections cut for enzyme histochemistry (Bancroft, 2002).

Hearing, Middle Ear Dissection, and Inner Ear Clearing

Hearing was assessed blind to genotype. Hearing ability was monitored at weekly intervals by elicitation of the Preyer reflex (ear flick) or startle response, using a click box to deliver a 20 kHz, 90 dB SPL stimulus. After culling, the middle ear was photographed through the tympanic membrane, before the middle ear was dissected open and examined. Ossicles were examined in situ, before being removed for more detailed study. Half heads were fixed in Bodian’s fixative and cleared with glycerol as described previously (Steel and Smith, 1992). The inner ear was examined for signs of malformation.

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Inner ears from P40 mice were fixed in 2.5% gluteraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, the organ of Corti exposed, and samples processed using the osmium tetroxide-thiocarbohydrazide (OTOTO) method (Hunter-Duvar and Mount, 1978). After critical point drying and sputter coating, samples were analyzed using an Hitachi S4800 FE scanning electron microscope at 5 kV (Hitachi Instruments, San Jose, CA).

Skeletal Analysis

Adult mice were X rayed using a Faxitron 43855A (Faxitron Corporation, IL). Skeletons were fixed in 70% ethanol, stained with Alcian Blue/Alizarin Red, and cleared in potassium hydroxide/glycerol according to standard procedures (Inouye and Murakami, 1976).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank F. Law and A. Beasley for assistance with ES cell culture; E. Grau and T. Hamilton for blastocyst injection; S. Bao for blastocyst isolation; P. Abbey and D. Paul for animal husbandry; B. Haynes for histological technical assistance; and C. Burton for macroscopic photography. The work in this publication was supported by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute grant number 79643 and Medical Research Council.

Contract grant sponsor: Wellcome Trust

Footnotes

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Abuin A, Bradley A. Recycling selectable markers in mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:1851–1856. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.4.1851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Baradie R, Yamada K, St Hilaire C, Chan WM, Andrews C, McIntosh N, Nakano M, Martonyi EJ, Raymond WR, Okumura S, Okihiro MM, Engle EC. Duane radial ray syndrome (Okihiro syndrome) maps to 20q13 and results from mutations in SALL4, a new member of the SAL family. Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71:1195–1199. doi: 10.1086/343821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bancroft JD. Enzyme histochemistry and its diagnostic applications. In: Bancroft JD, Gamble M, editors. Theory and practice of histological techniques. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. pp. 593–621. [Google Scholar]
  4. Borozdin W, Boehm D, Leipoldt M, Wilhelm C, Reardon W, Clayton-Smith J, Becker K, Muhlendyck H, Winter R, Giray O, Silan F, Kohlhase J. SALL4 deletions are a common cause of Okihiro and acro-renal-ocular syndromes and confirm haploinsufficiency as the pathogenic mechanism. J Med Genet. 2004;41:e113. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.019901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. de Celis JF, Barrio R, Kafatos FC. A gene complex acting downstream of dpp in Drosophila wing morphogenesis. Nature. 1996;381:421–424. doi: 10.1038/381421a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. de Celis JF, Barrio R, Kafatos FC. Regulation of the spalt/spalt-related gene complex and its function during sensory organ development in the Drosophila thorax. Development. 1999;126:2653–2662. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.12.2653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hunter-Duvar IM, Mount RJ. A technique for preparation of large cochlear specimens for assessment with the transmission electron microscope. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1978;351:33–44. doi: 10.3109/00016487809122720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Inouye M, Murakami U. Teratogenic effect of N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in mice [proceedings] Mutat Res. 1976;38:337–338. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(76)90162-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jurgens G. Head and tail development of the Drosophila embryo involves spalt, a novel homeotic gene. EMBO J. 1988;7:189–196. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb02799.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kiefer SM, Ohlemiller KK, Yang J, McDill BW, Kohlhase J, Rauchman M. Expression of a truncated Sall1 transcriptional repressor is responsible for Townes-Brocks syndrome birth defects. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12:2221–2227. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kohlhase J. SALL1 mutations in Townes-Brocks syndrome and related disorders. Hum Mutat. 2000;16:460–466. doi: 10.1002/1098-1004(200012)16:6<460::AID-HUMU2>3.0.CO;2-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kohlhase J, Chitayat D, Kotzot D, Ceylaner S, Froster UG, Fuchs S, Montgomery T, Rosler B. SALL4 mutations in Okihiro syndrome (Duane-radial ray syndrome), acro-renal-ocular syndrome, and related disorders. Hum Mutat. 2005;26:176–183. doi: 10.1002/humu.20215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kohlhase J, Heinrich M, Liebers M, Frohlich Archangelo L, Reardon W, Kispert A. Cloning and expression analysis of SALL4, the murine homologue of the gene mutated in Okihiro syndrome. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2002a;98:274–277. doi: 10.1159/000071048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kohlhase J, Heinrich M, Schubert L, Liebers M, Kispert A, Laccone F, Turnpenny P, Winter RM, Reardon W. Okihiro syndrome is caused by SALL4 mutations. Hum Mol Genet. 2002b;11:2979–2987. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.23.2979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kohlhase J, Schuh R, Dowe G, Kuhnlein RP, Jackle H, Schroeder B, Schulz-Schaeffer W, Kretzschmar HA, Kohler A, Muller U, Raab-Vetter M, Burkhardt E, Engel W, Stick R. Isolation, characterization, and organ-specific expression of two novel human zinc finger genes related to the Drosophila gene spalt. Genomics. 1996;38:291–298. doi: 10.1006/geno.1996.0631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Koshiba-Takeuchi K, Takeuchi JK, Arruda EP, Kathiriya IS, Mo R, Hui CC, Srivastava D, Bruneau BG. Cooperative and antagonistic interactions between Sall4 and Tbx5 pattern the mouse limb and heart. Nat Genet. 2006;38:175–183. doi: 10.1038/ng1707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuhnlein RP, Frommer G, Friedrich M, Gonzalez-Gaitan M, Weber A, Wagner-Bernholz JF, Gehring WJ, Jackle H, Schuh R. spalt Encodes an evolutionarily conserved zinc finger protein of novel structure which provides homeotic gene function in the head and tail region of the Drosophila embryo. EMBO J. 1994;13:168–179. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06246.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu P, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG. A highly efficient recombineering-based method for generating conditional knockout mutations. Genome Res. 2003;13:476–484. doi: 10.1101/gr.749203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Miertus J, Borozdin W, Frecer V, Tonini G, Bertok S, Amoroso A, Miertus S, Kohlhase J. A SALL4 zinc finger mis-sense mutation predicted to result in increased DNA binding affinity is associated with cranial midline defects and mild features of Okihiro syndrome. Hum Genet. 2006;119:154–161. doi: 10.1007/s00439-005-0124-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Okihiro MM, Tasaki T, Nakano KK, Bennett BK. Duane syndrome and congenital upper-limb anomalies. A familial occurrence. Arch Neurol. 1977;34:174–179. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1977.00500150060012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Osoegawa K, Tateno M, Woon PY, Frengen E, Mammoser AG, Catanese JJ, Hayashizaki Y, de Jong PJ. Bacterial artificial chromosome libraries for mouse sequencing and functional analysis. Genome Res. 2000;10:116–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Powell CM, Michaelis RC. Townes-Brocks syndrome. J Med Genet. 1999;36:89–93. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ramirez-Solis R, Davis AC, Bradley A. Gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. Methods Enzymol. 1993;225:855–878. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(93)25054-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sakaki-Yumoto M, Kobayashi C, Sato A, Fujimura S, Matsumoto Y, Takasato M, Kodama T, Aburatani H, Asashima M, Yoshida N, Nishinakamura R. The murine homolog of SALL4, a causative gene in Okihiro syndrome, is essential for embryonic stem cell proliferation, and cooperates with Sall1 in anorectal, heart, brain and kidney development. Development. 2006;133:3005–3013. doi: 10.1242/dev.02457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Steel KP, Smith RJ. Normal hearing in Splotch (Sp/+), the mouse homologue of Waardenburg syndrome type 1. Nat Genet. 1992;2:75–79. doi: 10.1038/ng0992-75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES