Skip to main content
American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology logoLink to American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology
editorial
. 2008 Aug 15;295(4):H1373–H1374. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00886.2008

Proteasome inhibition in hypertrophied myocardium

Ingeborg Friehs 1
PMCID: PMC2593524  PMID: 18708439

cardiac remodeling has been described as both an adaptive and a maladaptive process. The adaptive component enables the heart to maintain function in response to pressure overload and has the effect of decreasing ventricular wall stress and compensates for the increased workload preserving cardiac function. Along with the changes in ventricular mechanics, the development of hypertrophy is accompanied by distinct qualitative and quantitative changes in the myocardium. At the cellular level, cardiomyocyte hypertrophy is characterized by an increase in cell size, enhanced protein synthesis, multiplication of sarcomeres, a switch of proteins and enzymes to fetal isoforms (7), changes in intracellular Ca2+ handling (2), metabolic alterations (1), and increased rates of apoptosis (4). Left ventricular hypertrophy in response to pressure overload is primarily the result of myocyte growth, but there are also changes seen in the extracellular matrix with the focus of study being collagen. The extracellular matrix is the scaffold that supports the cellular elements of the myocardium. It is responsible for the maintenance of myocyte shape, alignment, and the overall ventricular geometry. Its composition and structure determines the material properties of the myocardium. Disruption of the extracellular fibrillar support and readaptation facilitates alterations in myocyte size and geometry, which is the structural basis of hypertrophy. However, progressive remodeling and collagen deposition of the extracellular matrix is considered deleterious and results in higher stiffness of the myocardium as seen in failing hearts. If pressure overload remains unrelieved, progressive ventricular dilatation occurs with a further increase in wall stress, afterload mismatch, and deterioration of myocardial function (12).

Cardiac hypertrophy requires an increase in the cellular accumulation of proteins in individual myocytes that results from the synthesis of de novo proteins exceeding protein degradation (13). At the same time, an increase in protein synthesis required for cardiac hypertrophy could potentially result in an increased load of misfolded or aberrant proteins. To relieve the burden of these aberrantly folded proteins, there is a concomitant increase in protein degradation. Protein synthesis and degradation are a highly regulated quality control phenomenon. The proteasome is a system by which the cardiomyocyte breaks down useless proteins to make room for new proteins. The proteasome system also degrades normal proteins that are no longer needed, providing temporal regulation of protein activity (5). The purpose of this system is for the removal of dysfunctional proteins and for the adaptation to new physiological states. As many as 30% of newly synthesized proteins are degraded in the proteasome (6). It therefore plays an important role in cardiac remodeling to maintain cardiac function. In general, increased protein synthesis and reduced degradation are logically linked to hypertrophy (13). It seems counterintuitive that blocking protein degradation by proteasome inhibition results in suppressing the progression of hypertrophy and preserves contractile function at the same time.

The study of Hedhli et al. (6a) presents evidence that the inhibition of the proteasome with epoxomicin prevents cardiac hypertrophy and preserves contractile function in a mouse model of pressure overload. The thoracic aortic banding model used in this study mimics human disease by increasing peripheral resistance without confounding factors that would result from pharmacologically induced cardiac hypertrophy models. Several studies have used inhibitors to implicate proteasome in some facet of cardiac function, but epoxomicin, the inhibitor used in this study, affords irreversible inhibition and is highly specific for the inhibition of chymotryptic activity (8). Also, only 30–40% of the proteasome is inhibited, which potentially limits cellular toxicity as the authors showed in their study.

It is still controversial whether cardiomyocyte hypertrophy is adaptive or maladaptive. Several studies have shown that the prevention of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in the presence of prohypertrophic signals preserves cardiac function (3). Besides its possible role in cardiac remodeling of the hypertrophied myocardium, protein degradation may also serve as a target for reverse remodeling following the relief of the obstruction. Reverse remodeling can only be successful if irreversible damage such as cardiomyocyte loss or extracellular matrix remodeling can be prevented. This would be especially interesting since one of the novel findings in the present study is that proteasomes regulate fibrosis through NF-kB. Besides apoptosis, proteasomal regulation of NF-kB is also involved in the regulation of collagen degradation through matrix metalloproteinase activation (9). Hedhli et al. (6a) showed that proteasome inhibition in the hypertrophied myocardium directly affects the cardiomyocytes and the extracellular matrix at the same time. At a time point of established hypertrophic changes, the treatment with epoxomicin induces the regression of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and affects collagen degradation via the activation of matrix metalloproteinases, which maintains the myocyte-collagen matrix relationship. Treatment directly targeting collagen can also prevent increased collagen cross-linking, which has been proposed as the mechanism of increase in myocardial stiffness.

The benefits from the inhibition of cardiac hypertrophy despite persistence of the prohypertrophic stimulus have only been short term, and long-term results are still missing. Therefore, the long-term-targeting of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in a heart with increased wall stress might still result in failure. Proteasome inhibition may be able to prevent cardiac hypertrophy by regulating protein synthesis but may ultimately lead to the accumulation of misfolded proteins leading to endoplasmic reticulum stress, actually aggravating endoplasmic reticulum stress that is already associated with pressure-overload hypertrophy, which ultimately results in cellular apoptosis (10, 11). Also, misfolded proteins accumulate, and concentrations of aggregated, misfolded proteins could easily interfere with either cell metabolism or the inherent function of a cardiomyocyte, since the aggregates can fill a significant volume of the cytosol and deform the cell and/or nucleus.

The main question that remains for the therapeutic modification of proteasome activity to prevent maladaptive cardiac hypertrophy is to determine the balance of synthesis versus degradation in the hypertrophying myocyte by conducting long-term experiments. It remains to be seen whether the regression of cardiomyocyte size and extracellular matrix remodeling or the correction of intracellular signaling provides a better strategy to maintain the function of the hypertrophied heart and delay the onset of failure. Antihypertrophic agents such as proteasome inhibitors will likely have to be combined with complementary strategies to achieve successful treatment of hypertrophy and the prevention of heart failure in patients.

GRANTS

This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-075430 and the Eleanor and Miles Shore Fellowship Program for Scholars in Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and Children's Hospital Boston.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Allard MF, Schonekess BO, Henning SL, English DR, Lopaschuk GD. Contribution of oxidative metabolism and glycolysis to ATP production in hypertrophied hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 267: H742–H750, 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chang KC, Schreur JH, Weiner MW, Camacho SA. Impaired Ca2+ handling is an early manifestation of pressure-overload hypertrophy in rat hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 271: H228–H234, 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Frey N, Katus HA, Olson EN, Hill JA. Hypertrophy of the heart: a new therapeutic target? Circulation 109: 1580–1589, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Friehs I, Barillas R, Vasilyev NV, Roy N, McGowan FX, del Nido PJ. Vascular endothelial growth factor prevents apoptosis and preserves contractile function in hypertrophied infant heart. Circulation 114, Suppl I: I-290–I-205, 2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Glickman MH, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev 82: 373–428, 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Goldberg AL Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature 426: 895–899, 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6a.Hedhli N, Lizano P, Hong C, Fritzky LF, Dhar SK, Liu H, Tian Y, Gao S, Madura K, Vatner SF, Depre C. Proteasome inhibition decreases cardiac remodeling after initiation of pressure overload. AM J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol (August 1, 2008). doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00532.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 7.Izumo S, Nadal-Ginard B, Mahdavi V. Protooncogene induction and reprogramming of cardiac gene expression produced by pressure overload. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 339–343, 1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kisselev A, Goldberg A. Monitoring activity and inhibition of 26S proteasomes with fluorogenic peptide substrates. Methods Enzymol 398: 364–378, 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Krappmann D, Scheidereit C. A pervasive role of ubiquitin conjugation in activation and termination of IkB kinase pathways. EMBO Rep 6: 321–326, 2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nakagawa T, Zhu H, Morishima N, Li E, Xu J, Yankner BA, Yuan J. Caspase-12 mediates endoplasmic-reticulum-specific apoptosis and cytotoxicity by amyloid-beta. Nature 403: 98–103, 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Okada K, Minamino T, Tsukamoto Y, Liao Y, Tsukamoto O, Takashima S, Hirata A, Fujita M, Nagamachi Y, Nakatani T, Yutani C, Ozawa K, Ogawa S, Tomoike H, Hori M, Kitakaze M. Prolonged endoplasmic reticulum stress in hypertrophic and failing heart after aortic constriction: possible contribution of endoplasmic reticulum stress to cardiac myocyte apoptosis. Circulation 110: 705–712, 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ross J Jr, Franklin D, Sasayama S. Preload, afterload, and the role of afterload mismatch in the descending limb of cardiac function. Eur J Cardiol 4, Suppl: 77–86, 1976. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sugden PH, Clerk A. Cellular mechanisms of cardiac hypertrophy. J Mol Med 76: 725–746, 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology are provided here courtesy of American Physiological Society

RESOURCES