Skip to main content
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics logoLink to Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
. 2008 Nov 7;25(11-12):531–534. doi: 10.1007/s10815-008-9275-5

Clinical outcome of frozen blastocyst transfer; single vs. double transfer

Atsushi Yanaihara 1,, Takeshi Yorimitsu 1, Hiroshi Motoyama 1, Motohiro Ohara 1, Toshihiro Kawamura 1
PMCID: PMC2593763  PMID: 18989770

Abstract

Purpose

Frozen embryo transfer has been established as an indispensable ART procedure for both the effective use of surplus embryos and the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. The frequency of frozen embryo transfer is increasing in our clinic, and we report that frozen embryo transfer is effective for patients with repeat failures. We present our clinical outcome of frozen blastocyst transfer (FBT).

Methods

In 2006, 470 patients received FBT (562 cycles (IVF: 354 cycles; ICSI: 208 cycles)). One frozen blastocyst was transferred in 412 cycles (335 patients) and two blastocysts were transferred in 150 cycles (135 patients). Assisted hatching was performed in all cases.

Results

In 412 cycles (average age: 34.6 years) who received a single FBT, the rate of clinical pregnancy per cycle was 40.7%, the live birth rate was 29.1%, the abortion rate was 21.6%, the ectopic pregnancy rate was 1.2%, the frequency of monochorionic twins was 2.3%, and the cesarean section rate was 38.3%. In 150 cycles (average patient age 34.8 years) who received two FBTs, the clinical pregnancy rate was 46%, the live birth rate was 35.3%, the abortion rate was 16.3%, the ectopic pregnancy rate was 4.4%, the frequency of twins was 15.9% and the cesarean section rate was 39.6%. A significant difference in the ectopic pregnancy rate and the twinning rate was found between single transfers and double transfers (P < 0.05). When IVF and ICSI were compared, there was no statistically significant difference in the abortion rate, the ectopic pregnancy rate, and the cesarean section rate.

Conclusions

The clinical pregnancy rate was similar for the transfer of one and two blastocysts. Single FBT decreases obstetrical risk without reducing the pregnancy rate.

Keywords: Blastocyst, Vitrification, In vitro fertilization, Pregnancy

Introduction

Cyropreservation has become an important assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedure. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer appears to not only reduce the risk of multiple gestation but also avoid the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [1, 2]. Blastocyst culture techniques have improved and the blastocysts can be cyropreserved by vitrification [3]. A number of investigators have reported superior clinical results with blastocyst transfer (BT) rather than transfers using cleavage-stage embryos [46]. Moreover, it has been reported that BT may be efficacious in cases of repeated pregnancy failure with cleavage stage embryo transfer [5, 6]. In women over the age of 35, single ET has also produced satisfactory results [7]. Since embryo selection is made at the blastocyst stage rather than the cleavage stage, this factor may improve the clinical success rate; therefore, higher quality embryos should be chosen for transfer. Frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) is useful under these circumstances. As the rate of twinning is high with dual transfer, this certainly increases the risk of prematurity and therefore the prenatal morbidity and mortality. The current trend for ART is to reduce the risk of multiple pregnancies; thus, the utilization of single FBT will increase. In this study, a comparison has been made between single FBT and double FBT with respect to pregnancy outcome.

Material and methods

In 2006, a total of 562 cycles (IVF: 354 cycles; ICSI: 208 cycles) were conducted on 470 patients using frozen blastocyst transfer. Among 335 patients with 412 cycles (average age: 34.6 ± 3.4 years), single FBT cycles were conducted and among 135 patients with 150 cycles (average age 34.8 ± 3.7 years), double FBT cycles were conducted with 92 IVF cycles and 58 ICSI cycles. The indications for IVF before frozen embryo transfer were tubal infertility, mild male factor infertility, unexplained infertility, early stage endometriosis, and the polycystic ovary syndrome. Background of each group of patients is shown in Table 1. The couples opted for either the mild stimulation protocol or the long protocol and full informed consent was obtained. In order to preserve surplus embryos and to avoid the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, blastocysts were frozen with vitrification using Cryotop (KITAZATO Co. BioPharma, Shizuoka, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s specifications [3]. The embryos that were graded more than “3BB” according to the Gardner’s classification were frozen.

Table 1.

Background of patients

  Single Double
Duration of infertility (m) 36.7 43.4
No. of Blastocysts available for fresh transfer 0.72 0.78
No. of frozen blastocysts 3.3 4.2
ET (Natural vs HRT) 79% vs 21% 71% vs 29%

Frozen blastocysts were warmed to 37°C in VT102 (KITAZATO Co. BioPharma, Shizuoka, Japan) and cultured with BlastAssist® (MediCult, Jyllinge, Denmark) for 3~4 h before transfer. Assisted hatching was performed on almost all cases via modified long zona dissection (LZD) [8]. Gardner’s classification was used for embryo scoring before transfer [9]. A single blastocyst was transferred on day 5 of a natural cycle or day 6 of a hormone replacement cycle [10, 11]. For endometrial preparation, Estrana® (Hisamitsu Pharmaceutical Co. Inc., Saga, Japan) was begun on the third menstrual day and continued until endometrial thickness was >8 mm. There was no difference between endometrial thicknesses between the two groups.

Luteal support was begun 6 days before transfer and continued for 2 weeks (a 222 mg progesterone vaginal suppository was inserted every 12 h and 125 mg of hydroxyprogesterone caproate was injected intramuscularly once a week). A clinical pregnancy was defined as a gestational sac on ultrasound. The chi square test and Student’s t test were used for statistical analysis, and P < 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

Result

The background of the patients is shown in Table 1. Although there was statistical significance in duration of infertility, there was no significance in the number of blastocysts available for fresh transfer, the number of frozen blastocysts in each and the number of natural or HRT cycles.

The results for total of 502 single FBT and dual FBTs are presented in Table 2. In the single FBT, the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle was 168/412 (40.7%), the abortion rate is 47/218 (21.6%), the ectopic pregnancy was 2/168 (1.2%), the frequency of monochorionic twins was 4/168 (2.3%), and the cesarean section rate was 46/168 (27.3%).

Table 2.

Clinical outcome of FBT; single vs double

  Single Double
Cycle 412 150
Age 34.6 ± 3.4 34.8 ± 3.7
Previous IVF 2.6 2.9
ICSI vs IVF 150 vs 262 58 vs 92
Clinical preg(%) 40.7 46
Live birth rate(%) 29.1 35.3
Abortion rate(%) 21.6 16.3
Ectopic preg(%) 1.2* 4.4*
Twinning rate(%) 2.3* 15.9*
Cesarean section(%) 38.3 39.6

*p < 0.05

For the two FBT transfers (150 cycles; average patient age 35.8 ± 3.7 years), the clinical pregnancy rate was 69/150 (46%), the abortion rate was 13/80 (16.3%), the ectopic pregnancy rate was 3/69 (4.4%), the frequency of twins was 11/69 (15.9%), and the cesarean section rate was 21/69 (30.4%). The frequency of monochorionic twins was 0%. There was a significant difference in both the ectopic pregnancy rate and the twinning rate between single embryo transfer and dual embryo transfer (P < 0.05). When IVF and ICSI were compared, there was no statistically significant difference in the abortion rate, the ectopic pregnancy rate, and the cesarean section rate (Table 2).

Discussion

In this study, comparison of clinical outcome of FBT between single transfer and dual transfer was performed. Both the clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were higher in dual transfer, however, the difference was not statistically significant. When the extopic pregnancy rate and twin pregnancy rate were compared, they were significantly higher in dual transfer group than in single transfer group.

It is thought that the embryo physiologically reaches the endometrium 5 days after ovulation; thus, blastocyst transfer on day 5 is logical. The stage at which embryo transfer is conducted can be selected based upon the patient’s needs and clinical circumstances. The literature contains a number of papers that compare the pregnancy rate of transfers at the blastocyst stage to that of the cleavage stage; these papers also address the efficacy of blastocyst transfer [46]. Blastocyst transfer has a higher implantation rate than that of cleavage stage transfer and is effective for cases with repeated pregnancy failures [5, 6].

Recently, a French group reported no difference in pregnancy rate between single embryo transfer and double embryo transfer [13]. They did not report any monochorionic (MD) twins following 107 single embryo transfers; however, we noted a 1.55% incidence of MD twins. This rate is higher than that of spontaneous gestation. Although the discrepancy in regard to MD twins between our group and the French group is unclear, blastocyst transfer may raise the rate of MD twins [14]. Furthermore, the literature contains a few reports addressing the cause of MD twins [15, 16]. Because of small numbers, there may be no monochorionic gestatations in a double transfer.

With recent improvements in culture media, blastocyst transfer has become established as an embryo transfer technique; furthermore, frozen embryo transfer has also evolved. Although the slow freezing method is used for cleavage stage embryos, the vitrification method can readily be employed at the blastocyst stage [3].

Freezing the embryo results in hardening of the zona pellucida; however, this problem can be resolved by assisted hatching (AH). It has been reported that the pregnancy rate of a frozen-thawed embryo increases with AH [12]. In our clinic, the modified partial zona dissection (PZD) method is used on the blastocysts for AH [7].

Previously, two or more embryos were transferred in order to increase the pregnancy rate; however, the current trend is to transfer fewer embryos to minimize obstetrical risk, such as multiple gestations, while maintaining a high pregnancy rate.

A number of investigators have reported that the pregnancy rate increased with a multiple transfer [2, 17]. If there is no significant difference in the pregnancy rate and the twinning rate increases with a double transfer, single transfer is the preferred method. Furthermore, the incidence of ectopic pregnancies increases with a double transfer. It has been suggested that tubal infertility is a major factor for the utilization of in vitro fertilization; thus, increasing the number of embryos transferred increases the risk of an ectopic pregnancy. With the use of a good-quality blastocyst following freezing, single FBT can achieve a comparable pregnancy rate to that of a double FBT. Moreover, single FBT can reduce the incidence of twins and ectopic pregnancies.

References

  • 1.Kinget K, Nijs M, Cox AM, Janssen M, Jacobs P, Bosmans E, et al. A novel approach for patients at risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: elective transfer of a single zona-free blastocyst on day 5. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;4(1):51–0. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Khalaf Y, El-Toukhy T, Coomarasamy A, Kamal A, Bolton V, Braude P. Selective single blastocyst transfer reduces the multiple pregnancy rate and increases pregnancy rates: a pre- and postintervention study. BJOG. 2008;115(3):385–90. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01584.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Mukaida T, Nakamura S, Tomiyama T, Wada S, Kasai M, Takahashi K. Successful birth after transfer of vitrified human blastocysts with use of a cryoloop containerless technique. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(3):618–20. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01968-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 4.Schwärzler P, Zech H, Auer M, Pfau K, Göbel G, Vanderzwalmen P, et al. Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(9):2097–102. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh398. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Barrenetxea G, López de Larruzea A, Ganzabal T, Jiménez R, Carbonero K, Mandiola M. Blastocyst culture after repeated failure of cleavage-stage embryo transfers: a comparison of day 5 and day 6 transfers. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(1):49–53. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.049. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 6.Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Har-Vardi I, Albotiano S, Sonin Y, Hackmon-Ram R, et al. Blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients who failed to conceive in three or more day 2-3 embryo transfer cycles: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(3):567–71. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Davis LB, Lathi RB, Westphal LM, Milki AA. Elective single blastocyst transfer in women older than 35. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):230–1. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.047. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 8.Lyu QF, Wu LQ, Li YP, Pan Q, Liu DE, Xia K, et al. An improved mechanical technique for assisted hatching. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(6):1619–23. doi:10.1093/humrep/deh809. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 9.Gardner DK, Lane M. Embryo culture system. In: Trouson AQ, Gardner DK, editors. Handbook of in vitro fertilization. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC; 2000. p. 205–64.
  • 10.Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG, Hunter HR, Fitzgerald CT, Horne G, Pease EE, et al. Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in natural or down-regulated hormonally controlled cycles: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril. 2006;85(3):603–9. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 11.Kawamura T, Motoyama H, Yanaihara A, Yorimitsu T, Arichi A, Karasawa Y, et al. Clinical outcome of two different endometrial preparation methods for cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in patients with a normal menstrual cycle. Reprod Med Biol. 2007;6:53–7. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0578.2007.00165.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 12.Gabrielsen A, Agerholm I, Toft B, Hald F, Petersen K, Aagaard J, et al. Assisted hatching improves implantation rates on cryopreserved-thawed embryos. A randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(10):2258–62. Epub 2004 Aug 19. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 13.Leniaud L, Poncelet C, Porcher R, Martin-Pont B, Cédrin-Durnerin I, Hugues JN, et al. [Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a two-year French hospital experience]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2008;36(2):159–65. Epub 2008 Feb 5, 2008. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 14.Peramo B, Ricciarelli E, Cuadros-Fernández JM, Huguet E, Hernández ER. Blastocyst transfer and monozygotic twinning. Fertil Steril. 1999;72(6):1116–7. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00412-4. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Derom C, Vlietinck R, Derom R, Van den Berghe H, Thiery M. Increased monozygotic twinning rate after ovulation induction. Lancet. 1987;30:1236–8. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(87)92688-2. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 16.Yanaihara A, Yorimitsu T, Motoyama H, Watanabe H, Kawamura T. Monozygotic multiple gestation following in vitro fertilization: analysis of seven cases from Japan. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod. 2007;4:4. doi:10.1186/1743-1050-4-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Schieve LA, Peterson HB, Meikle SF, Jeng G, Danel I, Burnett NM, Wilcox LS. Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk using in vitro fertilization. JAMA. 1999;282(19):1832–8. doi:10.1001/jama.282.19.1832. [DOI] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics are provided here courtesy of Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

RESOURCES