Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2008 Dec 4.
Published in final edited form as: Acc Chem Res. 2007 Apr 26;40(7):601–608. doi: 10.1021/ar700008c

Mononuclear Cu/O2 Complexes

Geometries, Spectroscopic Properties, Electronic Structures, and Reactivity

Christopher J Cramer 1,*, William B Tolman 1,*
PMCID: PMC2593863  NIHMSID: NIHMS60356  PMID: 17458929

Abstract

Using interwoven experimental and theoretical methods, detailed studies of several structurally defined 1:1 Cu/O2 complexes have provided important fundamental chemical information useful for understanding the nature of intermediates involved in aerobic oxidations in synthetic and enzymatic copper-mediated catalysis. In particular, these studies have shed new light onto the factors that influence the mode of O2 coordination (end-on vs. side-on) and the electronic structure, which can vary between Cu(II)-superoxo and Cu(III)-peroxo extremes.

Introduction

Numerous aerobic oxidations performed by biological1 and synthetic2 metal catalysts use copper, which is particularly well-suited for this purpose because of a favorable combination of redox and coordination chemistry properties. A common, fundamentally important reaction step is the seemingly simple interaction of O2 with a Cu(I) site to yield a Cu/O2 species that is activated toward O-O bond scission or attack at an organic substrate. Understanding the nature of Cu/O2 species and the mechanisms of their generation thus represents a significant research goal, towards which extensive studies of the reactions of Cu(I) complexes with O2 have been aimed.3 For the most part, these studies have focused on (μ-peroxo)- or bis(μ-oxo)dicopper complexes that result from trapping of initially formed 1:1 Cu/O2 adducts by a second equivalent of the Cu(I) reagent (Scheme 1). Because of the rapidity of this trapping reaction and/or the thermodynamic stability of the resulting dicopper species, the 1:1 adducts generally have only been observed as fleeting intermediates in low temperature stopped-flow kinetic studies of Cu(I)-complex oxygenations.3,4 Recently, however, several examples of such 1:1 adducts have been isolated as crystalline solids and characterized in detail via experiment and theory, thus providing new insights into geometric, spectroscopic, electronic structural, and reactivity properties. We summarize this work herein, with a specific view toward comparing and contrasting the properties of structurally defined CuO2 moieties and evaluating how these properties depend on the nature of the ancillary supporting ligands (for complementary perspectives, see refs. 3 and 5). Possible implications for understanding copper-promoted aerobic oxidations in biology and catalysis are then discussed.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis and Structures

Use of low temperatures and suitably sterically hindered supporting ligands to inhibit decomposition and dicopper complex formation were key to the successful isolation and structural characterization of the 1:1 Cu/O2 adducts shown in Figure 1. Complexes 1,6 3,7,8 and 49 feature side-on (η2) coordination of the O2 fragment, whereas it is bound end-on (η1) in 2.10 Comparison of the core geometries of 1a, 2, and 4 (Figure 2) reveals significant differences in metal-ligand and O-O bond distances that are indicative of different oxidation levels for the Cu ion and the O2 moiety. In 1a and 2, the Cu-N,O distances and geometries are typical for Cu(II) compounds. The O-O distances fall in the range characteristic of superoxide complexes (∼1.2-1.3 Å),11 the value of 1.22(3) Å for 1a being so short as to be similar to that of free O2 (1.21 Å). Indeed, vibrational spectroscopic data and results from theory (see below)12,13 suggest that this distance is underestimated in the X-ray structure of 1a, perhaps due to librational disorder of the O2 moiety like that identified in an analogous cobalt complex.12,14 In 4, an O-O distance of 1.392(3) Å, which is significantly longer than those in 1a and 2, is consistent with a peroxide assignment (typical O-O = ∼1.4 Å).11 In addition, a comparison of the Cu-N distances in 4 to those of a range of 4-coordinate (β-diketiminate)Cu(II) complexes revealed those in 4 to be generally shorter, supporting a Cu(III) formulation.8 The CuO2 core parameters of 3a from EXAFS experiments13 and 3b from X-ray crystallography are similar to those of 4 (e.g. for 3b, O-O = 1.39(1) Å), but detailed interpretation of the data for 3b was limited by disorder problems. In sum, the X-ray crystal structures clearly differentiate between the end-on and side-on O2 binding modes and suggest, at least to first order, that 1a and 2 may be considered as Cu(II)-superoxides, whereas 3 and 4 may be formulated as Cu(III)-peroxides. To further evaluate these oxidation level assignments and CuO2 core bonding, detailed spectroscopic and theoretical studies were required, the results of which are described below.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

1:1 Cu/O2 complexes, of which all except 1b and 3a have been structurally defined by X-ray crystallography.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cores of 1:1 Cu/O2 adducts determined by X-ray crystallography, with atoms as arbitrary spheres (1a) or 50% thermal ellipsoids (2 and 4) and selected bond distances (Å) and angles (deg) indicated. Atom color scheme: Cu, green; N, blue; O, red.

Electronic Structure and Bonding

(a) Cu and O2 fragment oxidation states

Among the various experimental data that may be used to understand the electronic structure of the 1:1 Cu/O2 adducts, the O-O stretching frequency (ν(O-O)) and the edge features in X-ray absorption spectra (XAS)13,15 are especially informative for ascertaining the O-O bond order and the Cu oxidation state, respectively (Table 1). The ν(O-O) values for 1a,b16 and 217 are similar to those usual for superoxide complexes (∼1075-1295 cm-1),11,18 whereas the values for 3a,b7,19 and 49 are significantly lower, albeit above the region typical for peroxides (∼750-930 cm-1). Such intermediate values have been noted previously for metal/O2 adducts,11,18 and the existence of a “more or less continuous range of values”11c that span 700-1300 cm-1 for such species has been noted.20 To better place the ν(O-O) data for 1-4 into perspective, we previously presented a correlation between these values and the associated O-O distances that was applicable to a range of side-on metal/O2 adducts characterized both via theory and experiment, and included simple oxygen species such as O2, O2-, and O22-.12 This correlation is better expressed by recourse to Badger’s rule (eq. 1),21 an

re=Cijνe23+dij (1)

empirical relation between an equilibrium internuclear distance (re) and the associated stretching frequency (ν) that has been applied with success recently in analyses of Fe-O and S-S bonding.22,23 Here we apply it to a greater range of compounds than analyzed in ref. 12, yet limited to side-on metal/O2 adducts excepting 2 and some simple oxygen species uncoordinated to any metal. The data (listed in supporting information Table S1) are plotted as O-O distance vs. 1/ν2/3 in Figure 3, and are in good agreement with a linear fit to eq. 1 giving C = 70.7 and d = 0.671 with R2 = 0.96. This fit excludes the experimental data point for 1a, which is deemed an outlier due to its unreasonably short O-O distance equivalent to that of free O2.

Table 1.

Selected structural and spectroscopic data

Compound O-O distance, Å ν(O-O), cm-118O) K-edge 1s → 3d, eV L3-edge 2p→ 3d, eV Ref
1a 1.22(3) 1112 (52) - - 6,16
1b - 1043 (59) 8978.6 930.8 13,16
2 1.280(3) 1117 (58) - - 10,17
3a - 968 (51) 8980.7 932.7 13,19
3b 1.39 (1) 961 (49) - - 7
4 1.392(3) 974 (66) - - 9
La2Li1/2Cu1/2O4 - - - 932.8 13
[(TMPA)Cu(OH2)]2+ - - - 930.8 9
[(Me3tacn)2Cu2(μ-OH)2]2+ 8978.7 15
[(Me3tacn)2Cu2(μ-O)2]2+ - - 8980.5 - 15

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Plot of O-O distance (Å) vs. 1/ν2/3 (cm2/3) for a range of side-on MO2 complexes and H2O2, O2-, O2, and O2+. Experimental and calculated data are shown as blue circles and black squares, respectively, and are listed in Table S1. The data for complexes 1a, 2, 3b, and 4 are labeled, with a parenthetical “t” denoting values calculated via theory. The line is a fit to eq. 1 (see text).

In further studies aimed at defining the electronic structures of the similarly side-on bound adducts 1b and 3a, a direct experimental comparison of their Cu oxidation states was accomplished through X-ray absorption spectroscopy (Table 1).13 Both the K- and L3-pre-edges for 1b were ∼2 eV lower than those for 3a, supporting their respective assignments as Cu(II) and Cu(III) complexes. Accentuating this point, the pre-edge 1s → 3d energy for 1b falls into the range observed for a set of bona fide Cu(II) complexes (8978.8 × 0.4 eV),15,24 whereas that for 3a is similar to those of other Cu(III) compounds (8981 ± 0.5 eV; cf. data for [(Me3tacn)2Cu2(μ-OH)2]2+ and [(Me3tacn)2Cu2(μ-O)2]2+ in Table 1).15 Similar comparisons of L3-edges (2p→ 3d transitions) are even more striking due to the high resolution of L-edge data (Figure 4).25 In general, differences in XAS edge energies may be traced to different charges at the absorbing atom (Q) and/or ligand fields (LF).26 On the basis of calculations and correlations to XPS data, LF contributions were deemed to dominate the XAS edge energy disparities between 1b and 3a, with the Q for the Cu(III) site in 3a being essentially the same as the Cu(II) center in 1b because of compensation by the strongly electron donating β-diketiminate ligand.13

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Normalized Cu XAS data showing the ∼2 eV difference between the L3-edge transition energies for 1b and the Cu(II) complex [(TMPA)Cu(OH2)]2+ vs. those for 3b and the Cu(III) compound La2Li1/2Cu1/2O4. Adapted from ref. 13.

Computational studies on Cu- and other metal-O2 complexes have been particularly useful in defining geometrical and electronic structural features having a bearing on oxidation state. As depicted in Figure 3, the theoretical data (all of which derive from density functional calculations with the mPWPW91 functional27 and basis sets of polarized double- to triple-ζ quality) follow Badger’s rule particularly well and are in excellent agreement with experiment in most instances. In cases of disagreement, challenges associated with librational motion and structural disorder may render the experimental data less reliable than the theoretical (cf. 1a, as noted above).12 The theoretical and experimental data taken together comprise a collection of bond lengths and vibrational frequencies that smoothly span the range from superoxide-like to peroxide-like, and this smooth progression suggests that the assignment of standard “integer” metal and O2-fragment oxidation states is not necessarily a straightforward procedure—covalent character in the metal-O2 bonding leads to species that may be regarded as valence-bond hybrids of the limiting superoxide and peroxide extremes.

The covalent communication between the metal and O2 fragment and its impact on apparent oxidation state has been analyzed in detail for a simplified model of 3 as illustrated in Figure 5.28 The 11b2 and 12b2 orbitals are bonding and antibonding combinations of the in-plane O2 π* orbital and the Cu dxz orbital (taking the z axis as the C2v symmetry axis and the x axis as parallel to the O-O bond vector). In the singlet state, the 3a2 out-of-plane O2 π* orbital is empty (it is singly occupied in the higher energy triplet state), and multiconfigurational treatments predict that the singlet ground state is well represented by

A11=c1L11b22c2L12b22 (2)

where c1 and c2 are configuration weights that indicate the relative importance of each determinant and ensure normalization. When the diketiminate ligand is rendered poorly electron donating by fractionally increasing the atomic charge of the nitrogen atoms (or by changing a backbone carbon nucleus to nitrogen; data not shown), c1 and c2 are found to be roughly equal in magnitude such that the 11b2 and 12b2 orbitals may be considered to be similarly populated. Algebraically, this situation is equivalent to a 2-electron in 2-orbital open-shell singlet, where the 2 orbitals are formed from positive and negative linear combinations of 11b2 and 12b2. In this case, those linear combinations correspond to an isolated Cu dxz orbital and an isolated O2 π* orbital, which would be the ionic valence bond picture associated with a classic Cu(II) superoxide species. Consistent with this analysis, the O2 bond length is predicted to be in the shorter range typical of a superoxide. As the electron donating character of the ligand is increased by fractionally decreasing the nitrogen nuclear charge (or changing a backbone carbon nucleus to boron; data not shown), the opposite effect is observed. The ratio of c1 to c2 becomes large and the 11b2 orbital simultaneously localizes more heavily on the O2 fragment. The resulting closed-shell wave function corresponds to a Cu(III)-peroxide species and consistent with this picture the O2 bond length is predicted to be correspondingly long. Variation between these two extremes proceeds smoothly with variation in nitrogen nuclear charge (Figure 5), illustrating the degree to which covalent communication mediates charge flow and the ligand influences the Cu-O2 interaction. It is noteworthy that the distance between the Cu and O2 fragment is not particularly sensitive to variation in the ligand’s electron donating capabilities, in contrast to a prior suggestion.29

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Calculated frontier molecular orbitals for the simplified (b-diketiminate)CuO2 complex shown, with a plot of Cu-O (red) and O-O (blue) distances as a function of the charge on the N-donor atoms. Adapted from ref. 28.

(b) End-on vs. Side-on Coordination

In addition to the assignment of the Cu and O2 fragment oxidation states, a separate structural feature of key interest is the mode of O2 binding to Cu. While side-on coordination dominates among the complexes shown in Figure 1, end-on bonding has been identified by X-ray crystallography in the active site of peptidyl α-hydroxylating monooxygenase (PHM)30 and in 2, and it has been suggested on the basis of spectroscopic data for several complexes that have not been structurally characterized.31,32 Determining the factors that influence the O2 binding mode is an important research objective, especially in view of the potential relationship between the O2 coordination geometry and reactivity with substrates.

Theory can provide key insights into these questions, but it proves technically extremely challenging to model end-on vs. side-on coordination because the varying degrees of multideterminantal character associated with these different binding modes can lead to significant errors in DFT predictions of singlet state energies relative to one another or to corresponding triplet states.33,34 A protocol that we have found particularly effective is to use DFT to obtain molecular structures, and then to correct singlet energies relative to those of triplets (which as single determinants are well treated by DFT) based on multireference second-order perturbation theory (CASPT2),35 the latter being designed to handle multideterminantal character in a rigorous fashion. The utility of this approach was first demonstrated in a mechanistic study of the activation of molecular oxygen to generate 3a.8 Temperature-dependent stopped-flow kinetics data in varying nitrile/THF mixtures indicated that the oxygenation reaction follows a two-term rate law (eq. 3), and a Hammet study using para-substituted benzonitriles revealed substituent effects on the bimolecular rate constant (k2). These and other results were interpreted to indicate that there are two competing pathways in the reaction (Scheme 2). The rate-determining step for one is exchange of THF solvent for nitrile prior to oxygenation, while for the other pathway coordination of O2 to the Cu(I)-nitrile complex is rate-controlling. CASPT2-corrected DFT calculations (including continuum solvation) provided insight into the structures of the rate-determining transition states and predicted activation enthalpies and entropies within experimental error for both pathways, although raw, i.e., uncorrected, DFT predictions were substantially in error.8

Rate=k1[Cu(I)]+k2[O2][Cu(I)] (3)

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Proposed dual pathway mechanism for the oxygenation yielding 3a.

Interestingly, in the pathway involving rate-determining solvent exchange the initial coordination of O2 is calculated to be end-on. While this structure is predicted to be a local minimum, it is separated by a rather low barrier (1.8 kcal mol-1) from the more stable side-on product that is isolated, and the free energy difference (4.7 kcal mol-1) is such that no observation of the end-on isomer would be expected at equilibrium. Nonetheless, the relatively small energy differences between the end-on and side-on structures suggested that it might be possible to access the former by suitably modifying the β-diketiminate ligand. One β-diketiminate modification involved incorporation of a thioether arm, so as to model the N2S(thioether) donor set in the active site of PHM. However, only side-on coordination upon oxygenation of a Cu(I) precursor was indicated by the spectroscopic data (ν(O-O) = 994 cm-1) and by theoretical calculations, which predicted only weak binding of the thioether sulfur atom to copper (Figure 6).36 Further ligand perturbations considered with computational modeling involved the introduction of an ancillary ligand whose steric and/or electronic requirements might bias the binding of O2 in 3 to favor end-on coordination; again, however, no simple, solvent-like ligand could be identified that led to the prediction of a thermodynamically stable end-on oxygenated product.37 Finally, given that the end-on geometry is likely to have more Cu(II)-superoxide character that would be stabilized relative to the Cu(III)-peroxide alternative by a less electron donating supporting ligand, we examined versions of the β-diketiminate in 3 with one or two CF3 replacements for the methyl groups on the backbone.38 CASPT2-corrected DFT calculations predict that each CF3 group does indeed perturb the end-on/side-on equilibrium such that with two such groups it is reversed, i.e., end-on coordination is favored. Unfortunately, theory also predicts that each CF3 group reduces the standard-state binding free energy such that it becomes positive with two CF3 substituents. Experimental studies appeared to confirm that prediction: with a single CF3 group O2 coordination was observed to be side-on (ν(O-O) = 977 cm-1) while with two CF3 groups it did not prove possible to isolate a 1:1 Cu/O2 adduct.38

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Calculated structure of the CuO2 adduct with a thioether-modified b-diketiminate ligand (selected interatomic distances shown; colors: blue, N; red, O; green, Cu; yellow. S).

Reactivity

Studies of the reactivity of Cu(II)-superoxos 1 and 2 have yet to be reported, but some investigations of 3a have been performed (Scheme 3). The observation that the oxygenation leading to 3a is irreversible at low temperature has been key to these studies, as this allowed the reactivity of 3a to be assessed in the absence of any free O2 or precursor Cu(I) complex. The complex is a poor oxidant, as revealed by (a) its lack of reactivity with a range of potential H-atom donors, including phenols, and (b) no phosphine oxide produced upon addition of phosphines and, instead, loss of O2 and formation of a Cu(I)-phosphine adduct.39 Addition of Cu(I) complexes resulted in the production of bis(μ-oxo)dicopper complexes 5 that feature disparate supporting N-donor ligands,7 while reaction of the germylene Ge[N(TMS)2]2 yielded a novel heterobimetallic [Cu(μ-O)2Ge]3+ core (6).40 In an unusual transformation, reaction of 3a with [Cu(MeCN)4]+ in the presence of 3,5-diphenylpyrazole led to 7,39 which features a Cu(II)-semiquinonato unit resulting from hydroxylation41 and rearrangement of a ligand aryl group (possibly via an NIH shift similar to ones observed for dicopper compounds).42 Since 7 does not form in the absence of added Cu(I) reagent, it appears that a peroxo- or bis(μ-oxo)dicopper intermediate is involved in the aryl oxidation process, although mechanistic information is lacking.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Summary of the reactivity of 3a. S-H = phenols, thioanisole, cyclohexene, ferrocene, HBF4. pzH = 3,5-diphenylpyrazole. PR3 = PPh3 or PMePh2. TMS = trimethylsilyl. L = tetramethylpropanediamine, 1,4,7-trimethylcyclononane, or a β-diketiminate with orthomethylsubstituents.

The basis for the poor oxidizing power of 3a and 4 was examined theoretically in studies that also evaluated Cu(III)-oxo species that would result from cleavage of the O-O bonds.43 Predicted reduction potentials and pKb values of 3a and 4 showed them to be difficult both to reduce and to protonate compared to the corresponding Cu(III)-oxo alternative. As a result, new O-H bonds formed when these species abstract hydrogen atoms from substrates were predicted to be quite weak and the transition states for these abstractions were predicted to have large activation enthalpies. The Cu(III)-oxo species were predicted to be much more reactive owing to a more favorable combination of reduction potential and basicity.

The lack of oxidizing power exhibited by 3a and 4 is associated with the strongly electron donating character of the β-diketiminate and anilido-imine ligands. While this character does promote binding of dioxygen to the Cu(I) precursors, it renders the subsequent adducts relatively unreactive towards reduction and protonation, and thus reaction with hydrocarbon substrates is thermodynamically unfavorable. Theory suggests that C-H bond activation reactivity will thus be enhanced by ligands (a) having less donating power, so as to increase Cu(II)-superoxide character at the expense of Cu(III)-peroxo character, and (b) designed to favor end-on coordination over side-on, since the former motif is also predicted to be somewhat more oxidizing than the latter for otherwise equivalent ligands. In addition, Cu(III)-oxo species should prove quite reactive if they can be synthetically accessed.

Implications for Oxidation Catalysis

Evidence has been accumulating to support the notion that 1:1 CuO2 species participate in biological oxidations,1 such as those catalyzed by the enzymes PHM,30,44 amine oxidase,45,46 quercetinase,47 and superoxide dismutase.48 Lessons learned in the studies of synthetic models like 1-4 can inform those focused on the metalloproteins. For example, the CASPT2-corrected DFT method shown to be applicable to the model compounds discussed above was used to examine in detail the preference for end-on vs. side-on coordination with various combinations of biologically relevant N-, O-, and S-containing ligands.43 The (N)2(S) combination found in PHM was predicted to lead most preferentially to end-on coordination with a singlet ground state, while other combinations that increased the donating ability of the ligand environment (e.g., by deprotonating an acidic ligand) changed the preference to side-on. To further appreciate the utility of the CASPT2-corrected DFT method it is instructive to compare these results to prior work on PHM active site models using more conventional DFT protocols. Prior to the appearance of the activated PHM crystal structure, side-on binding was predicted to be preferred with biologically relevant ligands based on restricted DFT results,49 the latter theoretical formalism tending to be heavily and inaccurately biased in favor of side-on coordination.33 In a more recent study,50 unrestricted DFT was employed together with molecular mechanics to model the PHM active site and the end-on binding mode was found to be preferred, but with the triplet state significantly lower in energy than the singlet, reflecting the problems of unrestricted Kohn-Sham DFT applied to multideterminantal singlets.33,34,51 Finally, we note that if one does not care about the relative energetics of the singlet and triplet states, unrestricted DFT can certainly still be useful for the prediction of various structural and vibrational properties, as demonstrated, for example, in reported observations similar to those described above for the factors influencing end-on vs. side-on O2 coordination to Cu(I) supported by various tripodal and tetrapodal ligand sets.52

In conclusion, our understanding of putative CuO2 intermediates in catalytic reactions has been deepened through the detailed investigations of the structurally defined complexes 1-4. Identification of a previously unforeseen Cu(III)-peroxo moiety provides precedence for the notion that such a species may be involved in catalysis, although in 3 and 4 poor oxidative reactivity derives from low reduction potentials and basicities. Such an electronic structure may be differentiated experimentally and by theory from an alternative Cu(II)-superoxo formulation as seen in 1 and 2, and we are beginning to understand how supporting ligands influence where a CuO2 unit may lie on the continuum between these extremes. Unambiguous evidence now shows that end-on and side-on CuO2 adducts are possible and may be energetically similar, although knowledge of how binding mode differences relate to oxidative reactivity is rudimentary;43 this presents a challenge for future research.53

Supplementary Material

SI

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the coworkers whose names are presented in the references for their contributions to the work described herein. Financial support for the work described herein was provided by the National Institutes of Health (GM47365) and the National Science Foundation (CHE-0610183).

Biography

Christopher J. Cramer was born in Freeport, Illinois in 1961. He holds an A.B. summa cum laude in mathematics and chemistry from Washington University in St. Louis, where he worked with C. David Gutsche, and a Ph.D. in chemistry from the University of Illinois, where he worked with Scott E. Denmark. He joined the faculty of the University of Minnesota in 1992 after postdoctoral work as an active-duty officer in the United States Army and presently holds the title Distinguished McKnight and University Teaching Professor of Chemistry, Chemical Physics, and Scientific Computation. His research interests are in the area of theoretical chemical modeling.

William B. Tolman grew up in Chelmsford, MA, and obtained a B.A. in chemistry from Wesleyan University in Middletown, CT (1983, research with A. Cutler) and a Ph.D. in chemistry from the University of California, Berkeley (1987, with K.P.C. Vollhardt). After a postdoctoral period with S.J. Lippard at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, he joined the faculty at the University of Minnesota in 1990, where he is now a Distinguished McKnight University and Lee Irvin Smith Professor of Chemistry. His research encompasses synthetic bioinorganic chemistry focused on modeling Cu and Fe metalloprotein active sites and polymerization catalysis focused on the synthesis of biodegradable materials derived from renewable resources.

References

  • (1).(a) Selected reviews:Isabel B, Carrondo MA, Peter FL. Reduction of dioxygen by enzymes containing copper. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2006;11:539–547. doi: 10.1007/s00775-006-0114-9.Whittaker JW. Free Radical Catalysis by Galactose Oxidase. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:2347–2363. doi: 10.1021/cr020425z.Solomon EI, Chen P, Metz M, Lee S-K, Palmer AE. Oxygen binding, activation, and reduction to water by copper proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001;40:4570–4590. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20011217)40:24<4570::aid-anie4570>3.0.co;2-4.Halcrow M, Phillips S, Knowles P. Amine oxidases and galactose oxidase. In: Holzenburg A, Scrutton NS, editors. Subcellular Biochemistry, Vol. 35: Enzyme-Catalyzed Electron and Radical Transfer. Plenum; New York: 2000. pp. 183–231.Fontecave M, Pierre JL. Oxidations by Copper Metalloenzymes and some Biomimetic Approaches. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998;170:125–140.Solomon EI, Sundaram UM, Machonkin TE. Multicopper Oxidases and Oxygenases. Chem. Rev. 1996;96:2563–2605. doi: 10.1021/cr950046o.Klinman JP. Mechanisms whereby mononuclear copper proteins functionalize organic substrates. Chem. Rev. 1996;96:2541–2561. doi: 10.1021/cr950047g.
  • (2).(a) Illustrative examples:Punniyamurthy T, Velusamy S, Iqbal J. Recent Advances in Transition Metal Catalyzed Oxidation of Organic Substrates with Molecular Oxygen. Chem. Rev. 2005;105:2329–2364. doi: 10.1021/cr050523v.and references cited therein.Markó IE, Gautier A, Dumeunier R, Doda K, Philippart F, Brown SM, Urch CJ. Efficient, Copper-Catalyzed, Aerobic Oxidation of Primary Alcohols. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;43:1588–1591. doi: 10.1002/anie.200353458.Murahashi S-I, Komiya N, Hayashi Y, Kumano T. Copper complexes for catalytic, aerobic oxidation of hydrocarbons. Pure Appl. Chem. 2001;73:311–314.Gupta R, Mukherjee R. Catalytic Oxidation of Hindered Phenols by a Copper(I) Complex and Dioxygen. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000;41:7763–7767.
  • (3)(a).Mirica LM, Ottenwaelder X, Stack TDP. Structure and Spectroscopy of Copper-Dioxygen Complexes. Chem. Rev. 2004;104:1013–1045. doi: 10.1021/cr020632z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lewis EA, Tolman WB. Reactivity of Copper-Dioxygen Systems. Chem. Rev. 2004;104:1047–1076. doi: 10.1021/cr020633r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hatcher L, Karlin KD. Oxidant types in copper-dioxygen chemistry: the ligand coordination defines the Cun-O2 structure and subsequent reactivity. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2004;9:669–683. doi: 10.1007/s00775-004-0578-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Osako T, Terada S, Tosha T, Nagatomo S, Furutachi H, Fujinami S, Kitagawa T, Suzukib M, Itoh S. Structure and dioxygen-reactivity of copper(I) complexes supported by bis(6-methylpyridin-2-ylmethyl)amine tridentate ligands. Dalton Trans. 2005:3514–3521. doi: 10.1039/b500202h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Itoh S, Fukuzumi S. Dioxygen activation by copper complexes. Mechanistic insights into copper monooxygenases and copper oxidases. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2002;75:2081–2095. [Google Scholar]; (f) Schindler S. Reactivity of Copper(I) Complexes Towards Dioxygen. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2000:2311–2326. [Google Scholar]; (g) Que L, Jr., Tolman WB. Bis(μ-oxo)dimetal “diamond” cores in copper and iron complexes relevant to biocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002;41:1114–1137. doi: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020402)41:7<1114::aid-anie1114>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Karlin KD, Tolman WB, Kaderli S, Zuberbühler AD. Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters of copper-dioxygen interaction with different oxygen binding modes. J. Mol. Catal. A. 1997;117:215–222. [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Itoh S. Mononuclear copper active-oxygen complexes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2006;10:115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Fujisawa K, Tanaka M, Moro-oka Y, Kitajima N. A Monomeric Side-On Superoxocopper(II) Complex: Cu(O2)(HB(3-tBu-5-iPrpz)3) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994;116:12079–12080. [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Aboelella NW, Lewis EA, Reynolds AM, Brennessel WW, Cramer CJ, Tolman WB. Snapshots of Dioxygen Activation by Copper: The Structure of a 1:1 Cu/O2 Adduct and Its Use in Syntheses of Asymmetric Bis(μ-oxo) Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:10660–10661. doi: 10.1021/ja027164v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Aboelella NW, Kryatov SV, Gherman BF, Brennessel WW, Young VG, Jr., Sarangi R, Rybak-Akimova EV, Hodgson KO, Hedman B, Solomon EI, Cramer CJ, Tolman WB. Dioxygen Activation at a Single Copper Site: Structure, Bonding, and Mechanism of Formation of 1:1 Cu/O2 Adducts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:16896–16911. doi: 10.1021/ja045678j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Reynolds AM, Gherman BF, Cramer CJ, Tolman WB. Characterization of a 1:1 Cu/O2 Adduct Supported by an Anilido-Imine Ligand. Inorg. Chem. 2005;44:6989–6997. doi: 10.1021/ic050280p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Würtele C, Gaoutchenova E, Harms K, Holthausen MC, Sundermeyer J, Schindler S. Crystallographic Characterization of a Synthetic 1:1 End-On Copper Dioxygen Adduct Complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006;45:3867–3869. doi: 10.1002/anie.200600351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11)(a).Vaska L. Dioxygen-Metal Complexes: Toward a Unified View. Acc. Chem. Res. 1976;9:175–183. [Google Scholar]; (b) Valentine JS. The Dioxygen ligand in mononuclear Group VIII transition metal complexes. Chem. Rev. 1973;73:235–245. [Google Scholar]; (c) Gubelmann MH, Williams AF. The structure and reactivity of dioxygen complexes of the transition metals. Struct. Bonding (Berlin) 1983;55:1–65. [Google Scholar]; (d) Hill HAO, Tew DG. Dioxygen, Superoxide and Peroxide. In: Wilkinson G, Gillard RD, McCleverty JA, editors. Comprehensive Coordination Chemistry. Vol. 2. Pergamon; Oxford: 1987. pp. 315–333. [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Cramer CJ, Tolman WB, Theopold KH, Rheingold AL. Variable Character of O-O and M-O Bonding in Side-on (ν2) 1:1 Metal Complexes of O2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:3635–3640. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0535926100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Sarangi R, Aboelella N, Fujisawa K, Tolman WB, Hedman B, Hodgson KO, Solomon EI. X-ray Absorption Edge Spectroscopy and Computational Studies on LCuO2 Species: Superoxide-CuII versus Peroxide-CuIII Bonding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:8286–8296. doi: 10.1021/ja0615223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Egan JW, Jr., Haggerty BS, Rheingold AL, Sendlinger SC, Theopold KH. Crystal structure of side-on superoxo complex of cobalt and hydrogen abstraction by a reactive terminal oxo ligand. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990;112:2445–2446. [Google Scholar]
  • (15).DuBois JL, Mukherjee P, Stack TDP, Hedman B, Solomon EI, Hodgson KO. A Systematic K-edge X-ray Absorption Spectroscopic Study of Cu(III) Sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:5775–5787. [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Chen P, Root DE, Campochiaro C, Fujisawa K, Solomon EI. Spectroscopic and Electronic Structure Studies of the Diamagnetic Side-On Cu(II)-Superoxo Complex Cu(O2)[HB(3-R-5-iPrpz)3]: Antiferromagnetic Coupling versus Covalent Delocalization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:466–474. doi: 10.1021/ja020969i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Schatz M, Raab V, Foxon SP, Brehm G, Schneider S, Reiher Markus, Holthausen MC, Sundermeyer J, Schindler S. Combined Spectroscopic and Theoretical Evidence for a Persistent End-On Copper Superoxo Complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;43:4360–4363. doi: 10.1002/anie.200454125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Nakamoto K. Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds, Part B. Fifth ed. Wiley-Interscience; New York: 1997. pp. 154–168. [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Spencer DJE, Aboelella NW, Reynolds AM, Holland PL, Tolman WB. β-Diketiminate Ligand Backbone Structural Effects on Cu(I)/O2 Reactivity: Unique Copper-Superoxo and Bis(μ-oxo) Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:2108–2809. doi: 10.1021/ja017820b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Suzuki M, Ishiguro T, Kozuka M, Nakamoto K. Resonance Raman Spectra, Excitation Profiles, and Infrared Spectra of [Co(salen)]2O2 in the Solid State. Inorg. Chem. 1981;20:1993–1996. [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Badger RM. The Relation Between the Internuclear Distances and Force Constants of Molecules and Its Application to Polyatomic Molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1935;3:710–714. [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Green MT. Application of Badger’s Rule to Heme and Non-Heme Iron-Oxygen Bonds: An Examination of Ferryl Protonation States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:1902–1906. doi: 10.1021/ja054074s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Brown EC, Bar-Nahum I, York JT, Aboelella NW, Tolman WB. Ligand Structural Effects on Cu2S2 Bonding and Reactivity in Side-On Disulfido-Bridged Dicopper Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2006 doi: 10.1021/ic061589r. ASAP (DOI: 10.1021/ic061589r) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Kau L-S, Spira-Solomon DJ, Penner-Hahn JE, Hodgson KO, Solomon EI. X-ray absorption edge determination of the oxidation state and coordination number of copper. Application to the type 3 site in Rhus vernicifera laccase and its reaction with oxygen. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987;109:6433–6442. [Google Scholar]
  • (25).de Groot F. High-Resolution X-ray Emission and X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 2001;101:1779–1808. doi: 10.1021/cr9900681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Glaser T, Hedman B, Hodgson KO, Solomon EI. Ligand K-Edge X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy: A Direct Probe of Ligand-Metal Covalency. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000;33:859–868. doi: 10.1021/ar990125c.and references cited therein.
  • (27)(a).Perdew JP, Wang Y. Accurate and Simple Density Functional for the Electronic Exchange Energy: Generalized Gradient Approximation. Phys. Rev. B. 1986;33:8800–8802. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.33.8800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Perdew JP. Unified Theory of Exchange and Correlation Beyond the Local Density Approximation. In: Ziesche P, Eschrig H, editors. Electronic Structure of Solids ‘91. Akademie Verlag; Berlin: 1991. pp. 11–20. [Google Scholar]; (c) Adamo C, Barone V. Toward reliable adiabatic connection models free from adjustable parameters. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1997;274:242–250. [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Gherman BF, Cramer CJ. Modeling the Peroxide/Superoxide Continuum in 1:1 Side-on Adducts of O2 with Cu. Inorg. Chem. 2004;43:7281–7283. doi: 10.1021/ic049958b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Pantazis DA, McGrady JE. On the Nature of the Bonding in 1:1 Adducts of O2. Inorg. Chem. 2003;42:7734–7736. doi: 10.1021/ic034867k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Prigge ST, Eipper BA, Mains RE, Amzel LM. Dioxygen Binds End-On to Mononuclear Copper in a Precatalytic Enzyme Complex. Science. 2004;304:864–867. doi: 10.1126/science.1094583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Chaudhuri P, Hess M, Weyhermüller T, Wieghardt K. Aerobic Oxidation of Primary Alcohols by a New Mononuclear Cu(II)-Radical Catalyst. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1999;38:1095–1098. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3773(19990419)38:8<1095::AID-ANIE1095>3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Jazdzewski BA, Reynolds AM, Holland PL, Young VG, Jr., Kaderli S, Zuberbühler AD, Tolman WB. Copper(I)-phenolate complexes as models of the reduced active site of galactose oxidase: synthesis, characterization, and O2 reactivity. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2003;8:381–393. doi: 10.1007/s00775-002-0420-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).de la Lande A, Moliner V, Parisel O. Singlet-triplet gaps in large multireference systems: Spin-flip-driven alternatives for bioinorganic modeling. J. Chem. Phys. 2007;126:035102–035107. doi: 10.1063/1.2423010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Kinsinger C, Gherman B, Gagliardi L, Cramer C. How useful are vibrational frequencies of isotopomeric O2 fragments for assessing local symmetry? Some simple systems and the vexing case of a galactose oxidase model. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2005;10:778–789. doi: 10.1007/s00775-005-0026-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Andersson K, Malmqvist P-Å, Roos BO, Sadlej AJ, Wolinski K. Second-order perturbation theory with a CASSCF reference function. J. Phys. Chem. 1990;94:5483–5488. [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Aboelella NW, Gherman BF, Hill LMR, York JT, Holm N, Young VG, Cramer CJ, Tolman WB. Effects of Thioether Substituents on the O2 Reactivity of β-Diketiminate-Cu(I) Complexes: Probing the Role of the Methionine Ligand in Copper Monooxygenases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:3445–3458. doi: 10.1021/ja057745v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Heppner DE, Gherman BF, Tolman WB, Cramer CJ. Can an Ancillary Ligand Lead to a Thermodynamically Stable End-On 1:1 Cu-O2 Adduct Supported by a β-Diketiminate Ligand? Dalton Trans. 2006:4773–4782. doi: 10.1039/b608980a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Hill LMR, Gherman BF, Aboelella NW, Cramer CJ, Tolman WB. Electronic tuning of β-diketiminate ligands with fluorinated substituents: effects on the O2-reactivity of mononuclear Cu(I) complexes. Dalton Trans. 2006:4944–4953. doi: 10.1039/b609939d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Reynolds AM, Lewis EL, Aboelella NW, Tolman WB. Reactivity of a 1:1 copper-oxygen complex: isolation of a Cu(II)-o-iminosemiquinonato species. Chem. Commun. 2005:2014–2016. doi: 10.1039/b418939f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).York JT, Young VG, Tolman WB. Heterobimetallic Activation of Dioxygen: Characterization and Reactivity of Novel Cu(I)-Ge(II) Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2006;45:4191–4198. doi: 10.1021/ic060050q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Laitar DS, Mathison CJN, Davis WM, Sadighi JP. Copper(I) Complexes of a Heavily Fluorinated β-Diketiminate Ligand: Synthesis, Electronic Properties, and Intramolecular Aerobic Hydroxylation. Inorg. Chem. 2003;42:7354–7356. doi: 10.1021/ic035056j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Nasir MS, Cohen BI, Karlin KD. Mechanism of Aromatic Hydroxlation in a Copper Monooxygenase Model System. 1,2-Methyl Migrations and the NIH Shift in Copper Chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114:2482–2494. [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Gherman BF, Heppner DE, Tolman WB, Cramer CJ. Models for dioxygen activation by the CuB site of dopamine beta-monooxygenase and peptidylglycine alpha-hydroxylating monooxygenase. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2006;11:197–205. doi: 10.1007/s00775-005-0066-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (44).Klinman JP. The Copper-Enzyme Family of Dopamine beta-Monooxygenase and Peptidylglycine α-Hydroxylating Monooxygenase: Resolving the Chemical Pathway for Substrate Hydroxylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:3013–3016. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R500011200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Juda GA, Shepard EM, Elmore BO, Dooley DM. A Comparative Study of the Binding and Inhibition of Four Copper-Containing Amine Oxidases by Azide: Implications for the Role of Copper during the Oxidative Half-Reaction. Biochemistry. 2006;45:8788–8800. doi: 10.1021/bi060481k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Prabhakar R, Siegbahn PEM, Minaev BF. A theoretical study of the dioxygen activation by glucose oxidase and copper amine oxidase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2003;1647:173–178. doi: 10.1016/s1570-9639(03)00090-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Siegbahn PEM. Hybrid DFT study of the mechanism of quercetin 2,3-dioxygenase. Inorg. Chem. 2004;43:5944–5953. doi: 10.1021/ic0498541.and references cited therein.
  • (48).Smirnov VV, Roth JP. Mechanisms of Electron Transfer in Catalysis by Copper Zinc Superoxide Dismutase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:16424–16425. doi: 10.1021/ja066369r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Chen P, Solomon EI. Oxygen Activation by the Noncoupled Binuclear Copper Site in Peptidylglycine-Hydroxylating Monooxygenase. Reaction Mechanism and Role of the Noncoupled Nature of the Active Site. J. Am. Chem . Soc. 2004;126:4991–5000. doi: 10.1021/ja031564g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Kamachi T, Kihara N, Shiota Y, Yoshizawa K. Computational Exploration of the Catalytic Mechanism of Dopamine β-Monooxygenase: Modeling of Its Mononuclear Copper Active Sites. Inorg. Chem. 2005;44:4226–4236. doi: 10.1021/ic048477p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (51)(a).Cramer CJ, Dulles FJ, Giesen DJ, Almlöf J. Density functional theory: excited states and spin annihilation. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995;245:165–170. [Google Scholar]; (b) Gräfenstein J, Kraka E, Filatov M, Cremer D. Can Unrestricted Density Functional Theory Describe Open Shell Singlet Biradicals? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2002;3:360–394. [Google Scholar]; (c) Cramer CJ. Essentials of Computational Chemistry: Theories and Models. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; Chichester: 2004. pp. 274–278. [Google Scholar]; (d) Cramer CJ, Wloch M, Piecuch P, Puzzarini C, Gagliardi L. Theoretical Models on the Cu2O2 Torture Track: Mechanistic Implications for Oxytyrosinase and Small-Molecule Analogues. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2006;110:1991–2004. doi: 10.1021/jp056791e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Cramer CJ, Kinal A, Wloch M, Piecuch P, Gagliardi L. Theoretical Characterization of End-On and Side-On Peroxide Coordination in Ligated Cu2O2 Models. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2006;110:11557–11568. doi: 10.1021/jp064232h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Neese F. A critical evaluation of DFT, including time-dependent DFT, applied to bioinorganic chemistry. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2006;11:702–711. doi: 10.1007/s00775-006-0138-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).de la Lande A, Gérard H, Moliner V, Izzet G, Reinaud O, Parisel O. Theoretical modelling of tripodal CuN3 and CuN4 cuprous complexes interacting with O2, CO or CH3CN. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2006;11:593–608. doi: 10.1007/s00775-006-0107-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Smirnov VV, Brinkley DW, Lanci MP, Karlin KD, Roth JP. Probing metal-mediated O2 activation in chemical and biological systems. J. Mol. Cat. A. 2006;251:100–107. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES