Skip to main content
The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine logoLink to The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
. 1977 Jul-Aug;50(4):391–395.

A Clinical Study of the Role of Enterococci as Sole Agents of Wound and Tissue Infection

Richard A Horvitz, Alexander von Graevenitz
PMCID: PMC2595528  PMID: 906558

Abstract

Patients who had enterococci isolated from wounds or tissues were identified from laboratory records. The charts of patients with pure cultures of enterococci were reviewed to determine the degree of clinically significant infection. We found that the frequency of infections in patients with pure cultures of enterococci was not significantly different from the frequency of infections in a control series of patients with negative cultures, but that it was significantly different from the frequency of infections in a series of patients with pure cultures of Staphylococcus aureus. Our conclusion that enterococci are not by themselves significant pathogens in wound or tissue infections is supported by a few experimental studies of other authors.

Full text

PDF
391

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bayer A. S., Seidel J. S., Yoshikawa T. T., Anthony B. F., Guze L. B. Group D enterococcal meningitis. Clinical and therapeutic considerations with report of three cases and review of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 1976 Aug;136(8):883–886. doi: 10.1001/archinte.136.8.883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Evans A. C., Chinn A. L. The Enterococci: With Special Reference to Their Association with Human Disease. J Bacteriol. 1947 Oct;54(4):495–512. doi: 10.1128/jb.54.4.495-512.1947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HITE K. E., LOCKE M., HESSELTINE H. C. Synergism in experimental infections with non-sporulating anaerobic bacteria. J Infect Dis. 1949 Jan–Feb;84(1):1–9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/84.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kippax P. W., Thomas E. T. Surgical wound sepsis in a general hospital. Lancet. 1966 Dec 10;2(7476):1297–1300. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(66)91704-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Onderdonk A. B., Bartlett J. G., Louie T., Sullivan-Seigler N., Gorbach S. L. Microbial synergy in experimental intra-abdominal abscess. Infect Immun. 1976 Jan;13(1):22–26. doi: 10.1128/iai.13.1.22-26.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Simchen E., Sacks T. Infection in war wounds: experience during the 1973 October War in Israel. Ann Surg. 1975 Dec;182(6):754–761. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197512000-00018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith R. F., Dayton S. L. Colonization of burns by Streptococcus faecalis related to contaminated porcine xenografts. Tex Rep Biol Med. 1973 Spring;31(1):47–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Weinstein W. M., Onderdonk A. B., Bartlett J. G., Louie T. J., Gorbach S. L. Antimicrobial therapy of experimental intraabdominal sepsis. J Infect Dis. 1975 Sep;132(3):282–286. doi: 10.1093/infdis/132.3.282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine are provided here courtesy of Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine

RESOURCES