Skip to main content
The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine logoLink to The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
. 1977 Jul-Aug;50(4):375–381.

Determination of the Pressure Drop Across an Arterial Stenosis Utilizing Angiocinedensitometry *

Yacov Itzchak, Alexander Silberberg, Raphael Adar, Victor Deutsch
PMCID: PMC2595533  PMID: 906556

Abstract

A method is presented for an evaluation of the hemodynamic significance of a stenotic lesion in the arterial tree.

Twenty-three patients were examined with arteriosclerosis obliterans and intermittent claudication of the same severity. Flow velocity data obtained by angiodensitometry and viscosity values calculated from the hematocrit were inserted into the Poiseuille's flow formula to obtain the pressure drop across a stenotic lesion in the left external iliac artery. By the same way, the pressure gradient was calculated in 33 “normal” subjects.

The normal pressure gradient along the external iliac artery varied between 23 to 110 dynes/cm2 (52 ± 24 dynes/cm2 for mean and S.d), and the normal resistance to flow was 6.08 ± 4.1 dyne sec/cm5).

Stenotic lesions of similar dimensions gave widely varying pressure drops (114-4,736 dynes/cm2) (mean and S.d 1,309 ± 1,224 dynes/cm2) indicating a difference in the hemodynamic significance of the various lesions. These values were significantly different (p(t) < 0.001) from the normal values. The resistance across these stenotic lesions ranged between 21 to 768 dyne sec/cm5 (196 ± 192 dyne sec/cm5) for the mean and S.d and this was significantly different from the normal group; p(t) < 0.001.

Direct measurement of blood viscosity coupled with angiocinedensitometry at rest and after forced vasodilatation should provide an accurate means of determining the relative significance of a stenotic lesion and distal vessel disease in a given patient on blood flow to the leg.

Full text

PDF
375

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barras J. P. Relation entre la viscosité sanguine et l'hématocrite I. Helv Physiol Pharmacol Acta. 1965;23(1):16–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Darling R. C., Raines J. K., Brener B. J., Austen W. G. Quantitative segmental pulse volume recorder: a clinical tool. Surgery. 1972 Dec;72(6):873–877. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Itzchak Y., Modan M., Adar R., Deutsch V. External iliac artery blood flow in patients with arteriosclerosis obliterans. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1975 Oct;125(2):437–441. doi: 10.2214/ajr.125.2.437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Itzchak Y., Yerushalmi S., Deutsch V. Blood flow measurements in the iliac arteries by an improved angiographic cinedensitometric technique. Invest Radiol. 1975 Jan-Feb;10(1):1–9. doi: 10.1097/00004424-197501000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mount B. E., van de Water J. M. Estimation of peripheral arterial bloodflow noninvasively by combining blood velocity, blood pressure, and pulsatile volume measurements. Angiology. 1975 Feb;26(2):165–171. doi: 10.1177/000331977502600201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. SELDINGER S. I. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography; a new technique. Acta radiol. 1953 May;39(5):368–376. doi: 10.3109/00016925309136722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine are provided here courtesy of Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine

RESOURCES